Arguments for God's existence
The classical arguments, each shown the same way: the argument whole, in its author's own words; the one premise the dispute turns on, marked; the strongest objection to that premise, in the objector's own words, beside it; and the cost of keeping or denying it, weighed both ways. The conclusion is yours to draw.
The Catholic Church teaches that God's existence can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason (the First Vatican Council, 1870) — which is why a Catholic study library can host these arguments, and their sharpest objections, without anxiety. That teaching is the section's warrant, not a verdict on any single argument: Hume, Kant and Gaunilo sit here at full strength.
Contingency is the first built in full; the others are in preparation, each to follow the same even-handed pattern. Every argument is shown with its strongest objection, in the objector's own words — the library takes no side.
The living debate
The classical statements and their classic objections are public domain, and hosted here in full. The modern revivals and critics — Pruss, Plantinga, Craig, Swinburne, Mackie, Oppy and the rest — are under copyright, so we don't host them: each argument page ends with cited links to where that debate lives, and the neutral scholarly surveys are the calmest doors in.
Each argument opens the same dated, source-by-source page the Contingency argument uses: the words are the philosophers' own; the numbered form, the marked hinge, and the cost lines are clearly-labelled apparatus, each attributed to a named thinker. Nothing here is an AI summary, and no page reaches a verdict.