1Tim 2:15

“The present book of Scripture, then, speaks of this love with which the blessed soul burns and is on fire with regard to the blessed Word of God. And she sings this wedding song through the Spirit, by which the church is joined and united with its heavenly bridegroom Christ, desiring to be mingled with him through the Word so that she may conceive from him and be enabled to be saved through this chaste bearing of children.”

“Therefore, just as the power which destroys what is born is begotten along with physical birth, so it is clear that the Spirit bestows a life-giving power upon those born through it. What, then, can be deduced from what we have said? That separating ourselves from life in the flesh, which death normally follows upon, we may seek a kind of life which does not have death as its consequence. This is the spiritual significance of the life of virginity. That this is true will be clearer if we explain a little further. Everyone knows that the function of bodily union is the creation of mortal bodies. But life and incorruptibility are born to those who remain united in their participation in the Spirit. It is not having children as such that is important but this spiritual regeneration. Excellent is the apostolic saying about this, that the mother blessed with such children "will be saved by childbearing," just as the psalmist utters in the divine hymns, "He establishes in her home the barren wife as the joyful mother of children."”

“Shall not women then be saved? Yes, by means of children. For it is not of Eve that he says, "If they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety." What faith? what charity? what holiness with sobriety? It is as if he had said, "Ye women, be not cast down, because your sex has incurred blame. God has granted you another opportunity of salvation, by the bringing up of children, so that you are saved, not only by yourselves, but by others." See how many questions are involved in this matter. "The woman," he says, "being deceived was in the transgression." What woman? Eve. Shall she then be saved by child-bearing? He does not say that, but, the race of women shall be saved. Was not it then involved in transgression? Yes, it was, still Eve transgressed, but the whole sex shall be saved, notwithstanding, "by childbearing." And why not by their own personal virtue? For has she excluded others from this salvation? And what will be the case with virgins, with the barren, with widows who have lost their husbands, before they had children? will they perish? is there no hope for them? yet virgins are held in the highest estimation. What then does he mean to say? Some interpret his meaning thus. As what happened to the first woman occasioned the subjection of the whole sex, (for since Eve was formed second and made subject, he says, let the rest of the sex be in subjection,) so because she transgressed, the rest of the sex are also in transgression. But this is not fair reasoning; for at the creation all was the gift of God, but in this case, it is the consequence of the woman's sin. But this is the amount of what he says. As all men died through one, because that one sinned, so the whole female race transgressed, because the woman was in the transgression. Let her not however grieve. God hath given her no small consolation, that of childbearing. And if it be said that this is of nature, so is that also of nature; for not only that which is of nature has been granted, but also the bringing up of children. "If they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety"; that is, if after childbearing, they keep them in charity and purity. By these means they will have no small reward on their account, because they have trained up wrestlers for the service of Christ. By holiness he means good life, modesty, and sobriety.”

“Who? Eve? No, but woman, that is, the female sex. Do not despair, he says, O women: God has given you a means of salvation — childbearing, that is, the good upbringing of those born; for one must not only give birth, but also raise them. And this is true childbearing, otherwise it is not childbearing but child-corruption. So then, what about virgins? What about widows? Have they utterly perished? No, the apostle does not say that they will not be saved by their own virtue, but that the upbringing of children contributes to the salvation of wives. A virtuous wife will raise her children in virtue as well. The virtue inherent in her passes through upbringing into her children also. Consequently, a virtuous virgin is undoubtedly saved as well. It seems to me that the apostle, having forbidden wives above from teaching in church, now gives them as consolation someone to teach. If you truly want to teach — teach your own children. Some, however, for reasons unknown, understood childbearing as referring to the birth that was from the Most Holy Theotokos. She, they say, having given birth to the Savior, saved women. But such an understanding is inconsistent with the speech that follows after this. For listen. That is, children, if they preserve the holy faith and dogmas. That is, they will remain in a righteous life. For faith is not sufficient: the beginning and source of a righteous life is love. By "holiness" the apostle means purity of the body. But since not all are virgins, he added: "with modesty." For modesty is not denied to those who live in lawful marriage. Or he simply calls purity modesty. But what if a wicked mother raises her children well? This, although unlikely, if it happens, she will receive a reward for them. But what if a good mother raises her children poorly? If she was negligent and indulged them, she will share the fate of Eli. But if, despite all her care and suffering, she could not make them better — which happens rarely — she will still receive a reward for her labors, since even the Son of God, despite all His works and teaching, had few, however, who believed.”

“That conjugal chastity is to be approved according to the evangelical law is shown by authority, as follows. 1 Timothy 2, it is said of woman: She shall be saved through the bearing of children, if she shall have continued in faith and love with sanctification: but in the conjugal act there is the bearing of children, and that is consonant with the law of God: therefore the conjugal act is consonant with the law of God.”

“Then when he says, yet she shall be saved, he answers a tacit question, because someone might say that if the woman is not for the man, and sin stems from her, she is harmful to men. But if something is not for someone, but is harmful to him, it should be destroyed. Therefore, the woman should not be saved. The answer is that salvation is of two kinds: temporal, which is common also to brutes, and eternal, which is proper to man: my salvation shall be forever (Isa 51:8). But the woman has lost neither of them: not the temporal, because she is not deprived of her sex as soon as a child is born; nor the eternal, because she is open to grace and glory by reason of her soul. Therefore, in regard to the first he says, she shall be saved and not rooted out; and this through childbearing, to which she is ordained by God. In regard to the second he says, if she continue. But since, if it implies a cause, does that mean that if she does not continue, she will not be saved? For the Apostle says that a woman does better if she does not marry. The answer is that this can be taken as a figure of speech, so that by man is understood the superior reason, and by woman the lower reason. Now good works are the product of the inferior reason, as is charity which conceives through the man and through which she is saved. The other explanation is literal, and the through does not express a cause but a repugnance. As if to say: the woman shall be saved, even if she enters by way of generation, i.e., if she marries and is not a virgin. Then the through suggests an increase of salvation, as though by generating children for the service of God, she will be saved the more: have you children? Instruct them and bow down their neck from their childhood (Sir 7:25). As far as the attainment of eternal salvation is concerned, there are three things to be considered: first, something in regard to the intellect; second, something in regard to the affections; third, something in regard to the external act. In the intellect is faith, through which the intellect is subjected to Christ; hence he says, in faith: without faith it is impossible to please God (Heb 11:6). And because faith avails nothing without charity, he immediately adds something in regard to the affections, namely, and love: if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing (1 Cor 13:2). In regard to the outward act he mentions two things against lewdness, which consists in two things, namely, in lust; and in regard to this he says, and sanctification, i.e., in chastity: this is the will of God, your sanctification; that you should abstain from fornication (1 Thess 4:3), and in drunkenness, against which he says, with sobriety: we should live soberly, and justly, and godly in this world (Titus 2:12).”

“Yet she will be saved through childbearing, if they continue in faith and love and holiness with self-control. This is a trustworthy saying. Yet she will be saved through childbearing. Not only Eve, but every woman. And by "childbearing," it is meant not only to bear children, but also to lead them according to God. What then shall one say, that virgins and barren women, and those without children and widows, are lost? Away with that though! For it does not say that they will not be saved by their own virtue; but that childbearing will also be a means of salvation for them, that is, the acknowledged means of being saved by their own virtue. if they continue in faith. If Christians have nurtured and remained virtuous. What then if she herself is evil, but nurtures well? It certainly cannot happen that what is bad trains well; yet if it does happen, there will be a reward. But what if being good she nurtures evil? She will die because of the evil of the children. And the priest Eli is witness. (1 Sam. 2-4) This is a trustworthy saying. Because the fathers, Paul says, will be able to share in the virtue of the children. On the Virtue of Bishops.”