From the early Church Fathers to now.
2 Patristic · 1 Orthodox · 1 Medieval
“And Philip going down to the city of Samaria, preached Christ unto them.”
“But Philip went down to the city of Samaria and preached Christ to them. And he was from among the disseminated ones, who first preached Christ in Samaria, and he began through the deacon, as Christ said to the apostles: And you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria (Acts I).”
“This is not the apostle Philip who is counted among the twelve, but one of the seven chosen for the care of widows, who also baptized the eunuch and catechized Simon. Listen to what the evangelist Luke says: after the killing of Stephen, "a great persecution arose against the church in Jerusalem; and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles" (8:1). From this it is clear that the apostle Philip, along with the other apostles, was in Jerusalem. Luke made this remark in order to show that Philip baptized those who had been given Christian instruction in Samaria. But the apostles Peter and John, having come to them from Jerusalem, imparted to them the grace of the Spirit. And if he had been one of the twelve apostles, he would have had the authority to impart the gifts of the Spirit as well. He baptizes only as a disciple, while the completing grace is imparted by those apostles who were given the authority to impart such a gift. Others say that Philip did not bring down the Spirit upon those baptized because he was only a deacon, put forward by those who were with Stephen, and did not hold either the presbyteral or the episcopal rank, as did the chosen disciples of the Lord. And that he was a deacon is attested by Paul in the "Canons" — he attests this not only about him, but also about Ananias, who baptized Paul himself. And being a deacon, he baptized due to the lack of presbyters in Samaria, because in case of necessity, when there is no presbyter, deacons are also permitted to baptize, as the Spirit Himself taught, having inspired that same Philip with the thought to approach the eunuch. It should be noted that after baptism, the Holy Spirit descends upon those baptized through the laying on of hands by virtue of prayer in the name of the Lord Jesus. Therefore, to this day this rite is observed in the same form.”
“He was a deacon of the same rank.”
“Not the apostle Philip who is counted among the twelve is this, but one of the seven, the one chosen with Stephen for the administration of the widows. That it is true is clear from here. For of the apostles only those left behind in Jerusalem, while the rest of the disciples were scattered elsewhere, as has already been said; and all were scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles. Among those who were scattered was this Philip, who also instructed Simon in Samaria, and having baptized the Eunuch by a divine oracle, was found by the Spirit of the Lord at Azotus, and then hurried on to Caesarea where he also came to be. For being tried by the persecution against Stephen, and fearing for fear that he share the lot of his partners, he returned home. Moreover, if the one who baptized in Samaria had been one of the apostles, he would have had the authority to bestow the gift of the Spirit, and Peter and John would not have had to come down from Jerusalem to confer the gift of the Spirit upon them. This one therefore baptizes only as a disciple; the apostles perfect the grace, to whom the authority for such a bestowal had been given. [LETTER FROM ISIDORE]”
The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.