The interpretation timeline

Eph 2:14

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

8 Patristic · 1 Orthodox · 1 Catholic

Eph 2:14 · Douay-Rheims
“For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and breaking down the middle wall of partition, the enmities in his flesh:”
Patristic before A.D. 750
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“" For the Creator's righteousness no less than His peace was announced in Christ, as we have often shown already. Therefore he says: "He is our peace, who hath made both one" -that is, the Jewish nation and the Gentile world.”
235
A.D.
Hippolytus of Rome Patristic
c. A.D. 170–235
“In order, then, to show the time when He is to come whom the blessed Daniel desired to see, he says, "And after seven weeks there are other threescore and two weeks," which period embraces the space of 434 years. For after the return of the people from Babylon under the leadership of Jesus the son of Josedech, and Ezra the scribe, and Zerubbabel the son of Salathiel, of the tribe of David, there were 434 years unto the coming of Christ, in order that the Priest of priests might be manifested in the world, and that He who taketh away the sins of the world might be evidently set forth, as John speaks concerning Him: "Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!" And in like manner Gabriel says: "To blot out transgressions, and make reconciliation for sins." But who has blotted out our transgressions? Paul the apostle teaches us, saying, "He is our peace who made both one; " and then, "Blotting out the handwriting of sins that was against us."”
Source
364
A.D.
Gaius Marius Victorinus Patristic
c. A.D. 290–364
“Christ, he says, "is our peace." Elsewhere Paul calls him mediator. He interposed himself of his own accord between divided realms. Souls born of God's fountain of goodness were being detained in the world. There was a wall in their midst, a sort of fence, a partition made by the deceits of the flesh and worldly lusts. Christ by his own mystery, his cross, his passion and his way of life destroyed this wall. He overcame sin and taught that it could be overcome. He destroyed the lusts of the world and taught that they ought to be destroyed. He took away the wall in the midst. It was in his own flesh that he overcame the enmity. The work is not ours. We are not called to set ourselves free. Faith in Christ is our only salvation.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"For He is our peace, Who made both one." What is this, "both one?" He does not mean this, that He hath raised us to that high descent of theirs, but that he hath raised both us and them to a yet higher. Only that the blessing to us is greater, because to these it had been promised, and they were nearer than we; to us it had not been promised, and we were farther off than they. Therefore it is that he says, "And that the Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy." The promise indeed He gave to the Israelites, but they were unworthy; to us He gave no promise, nay, we were even strangers, we had nothing in common with them; yet hath He made us one, not by knitting us to them, but by knitting both them and us together into one. I will give you an illustration. Let us suppose there to be two statues, the one of silver, the other of lead, and then that both shall be melted down, and that the two shall come out gold. Behold, thus hath He made the two one. Or put the case again in another way. Let the two be, one a slave, the other an adopted son: and let both offend Him, the one as a disinherited child, the other as a fugitive, and one who never knew a father. Then let both be made heirs, both trueborn sons. Behold, they are exalted to one and the same dignity, the two are become one, the one coming from a longer, the other from a nearer distance, and the slave becoming more noble than he was before he offended.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"And brake down," he proceeds, "the middle wall of partition." What the middle wall of partition is, he interprets by saying, "the enmity having abolished in His flesh, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances." Some indeed affirm that he means the wall of the Jews against the Greeks, because it did not allow the Jews to hold intercourse with the Greeks. To me, however, this does not seem to be the meaning, but rather that he calls "the enmity in the flesh," a middle wall, in that it is a common barrier, cutting us off alike from God. As the Prophet says, "Your iniquities separate between you and Me;" for that enmity which He had both against Jews and Gentiles was, as it were, a middle wall. And this, whilst the law existed, was not only not abolished, but rather was strengthened; "for the law," saith the Apostle, "worketh wrath." Just in the same way then as when he says in that passage, "the law worketh wrath," he does not ascribe the whole of this effect to the law itself, but it is to be understood, that it is because we have transgressed it; so also in this place he calls it a middle wall, because through being disobeyed it wrought enmity. The law was a hedge, but this it was made for the sake of security, and for this reason was called "a hedge," to the intent that it might form an inclosure. For listen again to the Prophet, where he says, "I made a trench about it." And again, "Thou hast broken down her fences, so that all they which pass by the way do pluck her." Here therefore it means security and so again, "I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be trodden down." And again, "He gave them the law for a defence." And again, "The Lord executeth righteous acts and made known His ways unto Israel." It became, however, a middle wall, no longer establishing them in security, but cutting them off from God. Such then is the middle wall of partition formed out of the hedge. And to explain what this is, he subjoins, "the enmity in His flesh having abolished, the law of commandments." How so? In that He was slain and dissolved the enmity therein. And not in this way only but also by keeping it. But what then, if we are released from the former transgression, and yet are again compelled to keep it? Then were the case the same over again, whereas He hath destroyed the very law itself. For he says, "Having abolished the law of commandments contained in ordinances." Oh! amazing loving-kindness! He gave us a law that we should keep it, and when we kept it not, and ought to have been punished, He even abrogated the law itself. As if a man, who, having committed a child to a schoolmaster, if he should turn out disobedient, should set him at liberty even from the schoolmaster, and take him away. How great loving-kindness were this!”
Source
428
A.D.
Theodore of Mopsuestia Patristic
c. A.D. 350–428
“Christ, conferring immortality on us through his resurrection, has put an end to this division [between Jew and Gentile], for there can be no circumcision of an immortal nature.”
176 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
604
A.D.
Gregory the Great Patristic
c. A.D. 540–604
“The Lord was looking upon our redemption, we who come from the Gentile people, when he said he would bring other sheep also. This you see happening daily, brethren; this you see accomplished today with the reconciled Gentiles. For he makes one fold, as it were, from two flocks, because he unites the Jewish and Gentile peoples in his faith, as Paul attests, who says: "He is our peace, who has made both one." For while he chooses the simple from both nations for eternal life, he leads his sheep to their proper fold.”
Source
522 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
Scholastic c. 1100 – 1500
1126
A.D.
Theophylact of Ohrid Orthodox
c. 1055–1107
“For before the incarnation of the Word there was great enmity between circumcision and uncircumcision; but now we have been reconciled, having become one faith. For now we are called no longer circumcision and uncircumcision, but we have one sign — faith. Imagine: two men, one a slave, the other adopted; both gave offense to the same person: one by committing an act worthy of losing his sonship, the other by running away; then both of them were made heirs and intimates. And so they were deemed worthy of equal honor, and two became one. In exactly the same way, Gentiles and Israelites turned out to be transgressors: the former as slaves, and the Israelites as sons. So then, what? Is it really such a great thing to have fellowship with the Israelites? You have raised us to the heavens, and now you point to this as something great? Yes, he says: that must be received by faith, but this by deeds themselves. However, he does not say that he brought us to the dignity of the Israelites, but that he raised both us and them to a better state. Yet the benefit to us is greater, because to them it was promised, but to us it was not promised, and we were far off, as the example cited above indicates. He explains what the barrier consisted of, and says: in the enmity toward God of both Gentiles and Jews — enmity that arose from our transgressions, as the prophet also says: "your iniquities have made a separation between you and God" (Isa. 59:2). So this barrier, the enmity, He destroyed by His Flesh. In what way? By putting an end to the enmity in the flesh. For since He united flesh with the Godhead, it is clear that He accomplished reconciliation, for the two natures were united and joined together. And on the other hand, He destroyed the enmity also by appearing sinless and fulfilling the entire law. For the law was a fence, that is, it was given for safety, to provide protection; but when transgressed, it creates a barrier — sin, through which we do not remain in safety but are separated from God.”
Source
1274
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Having recounted the blessings imparted to the Ephesians through Christ in a general way (2:13), he now recounts them in greater detail. Concerning this he makes two points: First, he shows how they have converged with the Jewish people. Secondly, how they are drawn closer to God (2:16). The first has three divisions: First, he reveals the cause of this convergence. Secondly, its manner (2:14b). Thirdly, its purpose (2:15b). Christ is the cause of this drawing together, for which reason he affirms "For he is our peace, who has made both one." This is an emphatic way of speaking to better express the reality, as though he said: Rightly do I say that you are drawn near each other, but this occurs through Christ since he is the cause of "our peace." "My peace I give you" (Jn 14:27). It is usual to adopt this way of speaking when the totality of the effect depends on its cause; for instance, we say that God himself is our salvation because whatever salvation is present in us is caused by God. In the same way, whatever peace we possess is caused by Christ and, as a result, whatever convergence men have with one another. For when a man is at peace with another he can securely walk towards or approach him. Hence, "he is our peace." Angels announced peace at his birth: "Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace to those he is pleased with" (Lk 2:14). Indeed, while Christ lived in the body the world enjoyed the greatest peace, the like of which it had never before possessed. "May the just man flourish in his days, and peace pour down till the moon be no more" (Ps 72:7). He himself proclaimed peace when he arose from the dead: "He said to them: 'Peace be with you'" (Lk 24:36). It follows that he "has made both one," joining into unity both the Jews who worshiped the true God and the Gentiles who were alienated from God's cult. "And other sheep I have, that are not of this fold; them also I must bring. And they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold and one shepherd" (Jn 10:16). "One king shall be king over them all. And they shall no more be two nations, neither shall they be divided any more into two kingdoms" (Ez 37:22). The manner of convergence is revealed when he states "and breaking down the middle barrier of partition." The method, then, consists in removing what is divisive. To understand the text we should imagine a large field with many men gathered on it. But a high barrier was thrown across the middle of it, segregating the people so that they did not appear as one people but two. Whoever would remove the barrier would unite the crowds of men into one multitude, one people would be formed. What is said here should be understood in this way. For the world is likened to a field: "The field is the world" (Mt 13:38); this field of the world is crowded with men, "Increase and multiply, and fill the earth" (Gen 1:28). A barrier, however, runs down the field, some are on one side and the rest on the other. The Old Law can be termed such a barrier, its carnal observances kept the Jews confined: "Before the faith came, we were under the guardianship of the law, confined in anticipation of the faith which was to be revealed" (Gal 3:23). Christ was symbolized through the Old Law: "See, he stands behind our wall" (Cant 2:9). Christ, however, has put an end to this barrier and, since no division remained, the Jews and the Gentiles became one people. This is what he says: I affirm that "he has made both one" by the method of "breaking down the middle barrier." I say a barrier "of partition" and not a wall. A barrier of partition is one in which the stones are not mortared together with cement; it is not built to last permanently but only for a specified time. The Old Law was a barrier of partition for two reasons. First, because it was not mortared together with charity which is, as it were, the cement uniting individuals among themselves and everyone together with Christ. "Be careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (Eph 4:3). The Old Law is a law of fear, persuading men to observe its commands by punishments and threats. While that law was in force, those who kept it out of love belonged by anticipation, as Augustine holds, to the New Testament which is the law of love. "For you have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear but you have received the spirit of adoption of sons" (Rom 8:15). Secondly, the Old Law is a barrier of partition because it was not meant to last permanently but only for a definite time. "As long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a servant, though he is master of all; but he is under tutors and governors until the time appointed by his father. So we also, when we were children, were slaves to the elemental powers of the world" (Gal 4:1-3).”
Source
Undated date unknown
Ambrosiaster Patristic
fl. c. A.D. 366–384
“The passion of the Savior made peace between the circumcision and the uncircumcision. For the enmity, which was between them like a wall and divided the circumcision from the uncircumcision and the uncircumcision from the circumcision, was abolished by the Savior. His command is that the Jew should not so presume on his circumcision as to reproach the Gentile, nor should the Gentile trust in his uncircumcision, that is, his paganism, so as to abhor the Jew. Both, made new, should maintain in Christ their faith in the one God.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.