The interpretation timeline

Heb 12:20

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

1 Orthodox · 1 Catholic · 1 Reformed · 1 Patristic

Heb 12:20 · Douay-Rheims
“For they did not endure that which was said: And if so much as a beast shall touch the mount, it shall be stoned.”
Scholastic c. 1100 – 1500
1126
A.D.
c. 1055–1107
“That is, they could not bear to hear with their ears what God was saying, as something terrifying. And so they became the reason for God's appearing in the flesh, so as to become accessible to them.”
1274
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“701. – He mentions the reason why they excused themselves, namely, because they could not endure God's words; hence, they could not endure the order that was given: 'What is all flesh that it should hear the voice of the living God, who speaks out of the midst of the fire, as we have heard, and be able to live' (Dt. 5:26). For God's words are said to be unendurable either when they cannot be understood by the intellect or transcend the affections. 702. – Then he gives the threatened punishment, saying: And if even a beast shall touch the mountain, it shall be stoned: 'Everyone that touches the mount, dying he shall die. No hands shall touch him, but he shall be stoned to death, or be shot through with arrows. Whether it be beast or man, he shall not live' (Ex. 19:12). The Apostle, to heighten the terror, mentions here only the beasts which the Law commands to be killed, in order to show the gravity of sin. Yet mystically the mountain is the loftiness of the divine mysteries, and the beast is a man living bestially: 'Man, when he was in honor, did not understand: he is compared to senseless beasts, and is become like to them' (Ps. 48:13). This beast touches the mount in two ways: first, by blasphemy: 'They have set their mouth against heaven' (Ps. 72:9); 'Bring forth the blasphemer outside the camp…, and let all the people stone him' (Lev. 24:14); secondly, by obtruding himself into divine matters: 'He that is a searcher of majesty shall be overwhelmed by glory' (Pr. 25:27).”
Source
597 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
Post-Reformation c. 1650 – 1900
1871
A.D.
1871
“that which was commanded--"the interdict" [TITTMANN]. A stern interdictory mandate is meant. And--rather, "Even if a beast (much more a man) touch," &c. or thrust through with a dart--omitted in the oldest manuscripts. The full interdict in Exo 19:12-13 is abbreviated here; the beast alone, being put for "whether man or beast"; the stoning, which applies to the human offender, alone being specified, the beast's punishment, namely, the being thrust through with a dart, being left to be understood.”
Source
Undated date unknown
Oecumenius Patristic
c. A.D. 550
“"For they could not bear what was commanded." He stated the reason for the excuse, because they could not bear what was being defined, that is, what was being commanded or said. Indeed, they said to Moses: "Speak to us, and let not God speak to us." (Ex. 20:19) "Even if a beast touched the mountain." Such was the terror that if the beast touched the mountain, it was stoned.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.