The interpretation timeline

Matt 1:20

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

15 Patristic witnesses · 6 Medieval witnesses

View
Patristic before A.D. 750
John Chrysostom · A.D. 347–407 A.D. 407
“He did not appear so openly to Joseph as to the Shepherds, because he was faithful; the shepherds needed it, because they were ignorant. The Virgin also needed it, as she had first to be instructed in these mighty wonders. In like manner Zacharias needed the wonderful vision before the conception of his son.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
John Chrysostom · A.D. 347–407 A.D. 407
“Or, The Angel appeared to Joseph when he was in this perplexity, that his wisdom might be apparent to Joseph, and that this might be a proof to him of those things that he spoke. For when lie heard out of the mouth of the Angel those very things that he thought within himself, this was an undoubted proof, that he was a messenger from God, who alone knows the secrets of the heart. Also the account of the Evangelist is beyond suspicion, as he describes Joseph feeling all that a husband was likely to feel. The Virgin also by this was more removed from suspicion, in that her husband had felt jealousy, yet took her home, and kept her with him after her conception. She had not told Joseph the things that the Angel had said to her, because she did not suppose that she should be believed by her husband, especially as he had begun to have suspicions concerning her. But to the Virgin the Angel announced her conception before it took place, lest if he should defer it till afterwards she should be in straits. And it behoved that Mother who was to receive the Maker of all things to be kept free from all trouble. Not only does the Angel vindicate the Virgin from all impurity, but shews that the conception was supernatural, not removing his fears only, but adding matter of joy; saying, That which is born in her is of the Holy Spirit.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Jerome · c. A.D. 347–420 A.D. 420
“But we are not to think that she ceased to be betrothed, because she is here called wife, since we know that this is the Scripture manner to call the man and woman, when espoused, husband and wife; and this is confirmed by that text in Deuteronomy, If one find a virgin that is betrothed to a man in the field, and offer violence to her, and lie with her, he shall die, because he hath humbled his neighbour’s wife. (Deut. 22:23.)”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Augustine of Hippo · A.D. 354–430 A.D. 430
“(Enchir. 38.) But shall we therefore say that the Holy Spirit is the Father of the man Christ, that as God the Father begot the Word, so the Holy Spirit begot the man? This is such an absurdity, that the ears of the faithful cannot bear it. How then do we say that Christ was born by the Holy Spirit, if the Holy Spirit did not beget Him? Did He create Him? For so far as He is man He was created, as the Apostle speaks; He was made of the seed of David according to the flesh. (Rom. 1:3.) For though God made the world, yet is it not right to say that it is the Son of God, or born by Him, but that it was made, or created, or formed by Him. But seeing that we confess Christ to have been born by the Holy Spirit, and of the Virgin Mary, how is He not the Son of the Holy Spirit, and is the Son of the Virgin? It does not follow, that whatever is born by any thing, is therefore to be called the son of that thing; for, not to say that of man is born in one sense a son, in another a hair, or vermin, or a worm, none of which are his son, certainly those that are born of water and the Spirit none would call sons of water; but sons of God their Father, and their Mother the Church. Thus Christ was born of the Holy Spirit, and yet is the Son of God the Father, not of the Holy Spirit.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
406 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
Medieval c. 750 – 1100
Remigius of Auxerre · c. A.D. 841–908 A.D. 908
“Because Joseph was minded, as has been said, to put Mary away privily, which if he had done, there would have been few who would not rather have thought her a harlot than a virgin, therefore this purpose of Joseph was changed by Divine revelation, whence it is said, While he thought on these things.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Undated date unknown
Pseudo-Augustine
“(Serm. in App. 195.) Yet though Joseph think on these things, let not Mary the daughter of David be troubled; as the word of the Prophet brought pardon to David, so the Angel of the Saviour delivers Mary. Behold, again appears Gabriel the bridesman of this Virgin; as it follows, Behold the Angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Pseudo-Chrysostom
“There were three reasons why the Angel appeared to Joseph with this message. First, that a just man might not be led into an unjust action, with just intentions. Secondly, for the honour of the mother herself, for had she been put away, she could not have been free from evil suspicion among the unbelievers. Thirdly, that Joseph, understanding the holy conception, might keep himself from her with more care than before He did not appear to Joseph before the conception, that he should not think those things that Zacharias thought, nor suffer what he suffered in falling into the sin of unbelief concerning the conception of his wife in her old age. For it was yet more incredible that a virgin should conceive, than that a woman past the age should conceive.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Glossa Ordinaria
“(ord.) To be born in her, and born of her, are two different things; to be born of her is to come into the world; to be born in her, is the same as to be conceived. Or the word born is used according to the foreknowledge of the Angel which he has of God, to whom the future is as the past.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Pseudo-Augustine
“(Hil. Quæst. N. et V. Test. qu. 52.) But if Christ was born by the agency of the Holy Ghost, how is that said, Wisdom hath built herself an house? (Prov. 9:1.) That house may be taken in two meanings. First, the house of Christ is the Church, which He built with His own blood; and secondly, His body may be called His house, as it is called His temple. But the work of the Holy Spirit, is also the work of the Son of God, because of the unity of their nature and their will; for whether it be the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit, that doeth it, it is the Trinity that works, and what the Three do, is of One God.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 1:20 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗

The reader meets the sources first; chronology and attribution do the work. Provenance is shown on every quotation — solid for hosted public domain, dashed for link-out.