The interpretation timeline

Matt 26:47

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

5 Patristic witnesses · 4 Medieval witnesses

View
Patristic before A.D. 750
Origen · c. A.D. 184–253 A.D. 253
“Some may say that a great multitude came, because of the great multitude of those who already believed, who, they feared, might rescue Him out of their hands; but I think there is another reason for this, and that is, that they who thought that He cast out dæmons through Beelzebub, supposed that by some magic He might escape the hands of those who sought to hold Him. Even now do many fight against Jesus with spiritual weapons, to wit, with divers and shifting dogmas concerning God. It deserves enquiry why, when He was known by face to all who dwelt in Judæa, he should have given them a sign, as though they were unacquainted with His person. But a tradition to this effect has come down to us, that not only had He two different forms, one under which He appeared to men, the other into which He was transfigured before His disciples in the mount, but also that He appeared to each man in such degree as the beholder was worthy; in like manner as we read of the manna, that it had a flavour adapted to every variety of use, and as the word of God shews not alike to all. They required therefore a sign by reason of this His transfiguration.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 26:47-50 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Origen · c. A.D. 184–253 A.D. 253
“If it be asked why Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, according to some it was because He desired to keep up the reverence due to his Master, and did not dare to make an open assault upon Him; according to others, it was out of fear that if he came as an avowed enemy, he might be the cause of His escape, which he believed Jesus had it in His power to effect. But I think that all betrayers of truth love to assume the guise of truth, and to use the sign of a kiss. Like Judas also, all heretics call Jesus Rabbi, and receive from Him mild answer. And Jesus said unto him, Friend, wherefore art thou come? He says, Friend, upbraiding his hypocrisy; for in Scripture we never find this term of address used to any of the good, but as above, Friend, how camest thou in hither? (Matt. 22:12.) and, Friend, I do thee no wrong. (Matt. 20:13.)”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 26:47-50 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
154 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
426 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
Medieval c. 750 – 1100
Remigius of Auxerre · c. A.D. 841–908 A.D. 908
“One of the twelve, by association of name, not of desert. This shews the monstrous wickedness of the man who from the dignity of the Apostleship became the traitor. To shew that it was out of envy that they seized Him, it is added, A great multitude sent by the Chief Priests and elders of the people.”
Catena Aurea: Gospel of Matthew, as excerpted in the Catena Aurea on Matthew 26:47-50 PD · J. H. Newman (Oxford, 1841) ↗
Undated date unknown

The reader meets the sources first; chronology and attribution do the work. Provenance is shown on every quotation — solid for hosted public domain, dashed for link-out.