A citation from the library

Ambrosiaster — on Gal 2:3 (EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 2.3)

Patristic

Ambrosiaster · fl. c. A.D. 366–384

“The implication is "Why should you be circumcised, when Titus was not compelled to undergo circumcision by the apostles? Titus, who had an important role, was accepted without circumcision."”

Historical Christian Faith commentaries database, on Gal 2:3 (EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 2.3) PD · Historical Christian Faith commentaries database ↗

read in context — Historical Christian Faith commentaries database → cite

Imported from an open dataset — not yet checked against the printed edition.

Appears in

The timeline on Gal 2:3 →

This page is the stable address of one quotation — verbatim, dated, attributed, with its edition. Cite it freely.