Thomas Aquinas

Above, the Apostle showed in many ways the superiority of Christ over the Angels; here from this he concludes that the teaching of Christ, namely the New Testament, must be obeyed more than the Old Testament. And concerning this he does three things. For first he sets down the intended conclusion; second he brings forward a reason for the intended conclusion; third he confirms the consequence of the reason. The first, at the beginning; the second, where he says "For if that which through Angels"; the third, where he says "For not to Angels."

Concerning the first it must be known that in Ex. 23:20, after the judicial and moral precepts of the law had been given, he adds: "Behold, I send my Angel," etc., and there follows: "Observe therefore and hear his voice," etc. If therefore the command of the Angel, through whom the law was given, were kept, entrance would be prepared to the homeland. Whence also in Matt. 19:17 it is said: "If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments." It is necessary therefore to keep those commandments of the law; therefore it is necessary all the more to obey the commandments of him who is greater than the Angels, through whom the law was given. And this is what he says: "Therefore we ought more abundantly to observe the things which we have heard." Abd. 1:1: "We have heard a hearing from the Lord." Hab. 3:2: "Lord, I have heard thy hearing, and I feared." It is necessary therefore to observe more abundantly.

And he says "more abundantly" on account of three things: first, on account of the authority of the one speaking, because this one is creator and Son of God, and that one a creature and minister of God. Acts 5:29: "We ought to obey God rather than men," and also than Angels. Second, on account of the usefulness of the things said, because they are words of eternal life. John 6:69: "Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of life," etc.; those others are of temporal goods. Is. 1:19: "If you be willing and hearken to me, you shall eat the good things of the land," etc. Third, on account of the sweetness of observance, because these things are sweet: 1 John 5:3: "His commandments are not heavy," and Matt. 11:30: "My yoke is sweet," etc.; those others are heavy: Acts 15:10: "This is a burden which neither we nor our fathers were able to bear."

Second, he shows the same thing from the imminent danger, when he says "lest perhaps we should flow utterly away," that is, be eternally damned. Here it must be known that one flows away through bodily punishments — 2 Kings 19:14: "We slide away like waters upon the ground" — one flows out through fault, but one flows utterly away, bodily, through eternal damnation, because not even a shard remains. Is. 30:14: "It shall be broken as the potter's vessel is broken with a mighty destruction, and there shall not be found among the pieces thereof a sherd."

Next he brings forward a reason for this, which contains a single conditional containing a comparison of the New and the Old Testament. In the antecedent is set down the condition of the Old Testament; in the consequent, the condition of the New Testament. Concerning the Old, however, he sets down three things: namely, the authority of the law; second, the firmness of its truth, where he says "which was made firm"; third, the necessity of observing it, where he says "and every transgression."

First he sets down the authority, because the law was not given by human reason, but through Angels. Gal. 3:19: "ordained by Angels," etc. Acts 7:38: "This is that Moses who was in the church in the wilderness with the Angel who spoke to him on mount Sinai," etc. Nor is this to be wondered at, because, as Dionysius proves, revelations of divine illuminations come to us by the mediation of Angels.

The firmness of the truth, however, he shows when he says "which was made firm," because everything that was foretold in the old law was entirely fulfilled. Matt. 5:18: "One iota or one tittle shall not pass from the law till all things be done"; and Prov. 12:19: "The lip of truth shall be firm for ever"; and the Psalm: "The things that proceed from my lips I will not make void." It was made firm, therefore, because it was not made void.

He shows the necessity by which transgressors are punished. Whence he says "and every transgression and disobedience," etc. Where he sets down one thing which corresponds to a twofold fault, namely the sin of omission and of transgression. The first corresponds to affirmative precepts, the other to negative ones. The first is signified by the name of disobedience. But is disobedience a general sin? And it seems that it is, from what is said here. To which it must be said that a sin is called special from the intention of a special end. Whence when someone does not keep a precept with this intention, that he may despise the precept, thus it is a special sin; but when it is from some other cause, for instance when it is from concupiscence, then it is a condition following upon sin, but not however a special sin. The other, however, is called transgression. Ps. 118:115: "I have accounted transgressors," etc.

Likewise he sets down another thing on the part of the punishment, when he says "received a just recompense of reward." For recompense regards the quantity of the fault, so that he who has sinned more is punished more. Reward, however, regards the quality, so that he who has sinned by the fire of lust may be tormented by fire. He will receive, therefore, a good reward for good things, and a bad one for bad things. And thus "reward" is taken both in a good and in a bad sense, insofar as it implies the justice of distributing. He says "just" on account of the equality of the punishment, namely that the measure of the stripes should be according to the measure of the sin. Concerning the punishments, it is found in Lev. 26 and Deut. 28. The Gloss says: "just," lest it be thought that justice perishes on account of mercy.

Next, when he says "how shall we escape," etc., he sets down the consequent of his conditional, in which he describes the condition of the New Testament, where he does three things. For first he shows the necessity of observing it; second, the origin of the New Testament; third, the firmness of its truth. The second, where he says "which having taken its beginning." The third, where he says "God also bearing witness." He says therefore: If the word given through Angels punishes transgressors and the disobedient, how shall we escape, etc. In which he denotes the danger that threatens those who do not observe it.

Above, however, he called the Old Testament "salvation." The reason for this is that the word is ordered only to knowledge, for this is what the Old Testament does, because through it there is knowledge of sin. Rom. 3:20: "Through the law, knowledge of sin." Likewise, knowledge of God. Ps. 147:9: "He hath not done in like manner to every nation." And elsewhere, 75:1: "In Judea God is known," etc. It did not, however, confer grace, but in the New Testament grace is conferred. John 1:17: "Grace and truth were made through Jesus Christ," which leads to eternal salvation. John 6:69: "Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life." Ps. 118:140: "Thy speech is exceedingly inflamed."

Likewise, he commends it from its quantity. And he says "so great," that is, very great. And certainly it is very great, if you consider from what dangers it frees: because it frees not only from the dangers of bodily death, but also of spiritual death. Matt. 1:21: "For he shall save his people from their sins." Likewise it is great, because it is universal, that is, not of one people only, nor from one danger, but it is of all men and from all enemies. 1 Tim. 4:10: "Who is the savior of all, but especially of the faithful." Luke 1:74: "That being delivered from the hand of our enemies, without fear," etc. Likewise it is great, because it is eternal. Is. 45:17: "Israel is saved in the Lord with an everlasting salvation." And therefore it is not to be neglected, but we ought to be solicitous to obtain it. Judges 18:9: "We have seen a land exceedingly rich and fruitful." And there follows: "Do not neglect, do not cease," etc. And truly we ought not to neglect it, because if we shall have been negligent, we will be punished, not only by the loss of the good, but we shall also incur an evil, namely of eternal damnation, which we shall not be able to escape. Therefore he says, "How shall we escape?" Matt. 3:7: "Who will show you to flee from the wrath to come?" Job 11:20: "Flight shall perish from them." Ps. 138:6: "Whither shall I go from thy spirit? Or whither shall I flee from thy face?"

He shows the origin of the teaching of the New Testament, when he says "which having taken its beginning," etc. Where he sets down its twofold origin. The first was not through Angels, but through Christ himself. Above, 1:2: "He hath spoken to us by his Son." John 1:18: "The only-begotten, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him." And therefore he says "which, having taken its beginning of being declared through the Lord" — because it has a twofold beginning: one simply, and that is from eternity, and this is through the Word itself. Eph. 1:4: "He chose us in him before the foundation of the world." The other is the beginning of the declaring, and this was in time, through the Word incarnate. The second origin was through the apostles who heard from Christ. Whence he says "by them that heard," that is, through their preaching. 1 John 1:1: "That which was from the beginning, which we have seen and have heard," etc. Luke 1:2: "As they related to us, who from the beginning themselves saw."

Then he sets down its firmness, which is greater than the firmness of the Old Testament, which he shows from the testimony of God, who cannot lie. Whence he says "it was confirmed, God bearing witness," etc. It must be known, however, that testimony is through speech: speech is a sensible sign. God, however, bore witness by a twofold sensible sign, namely by miracles and by the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

As to the first, he says that it was confirmed, God bearing witness, by "signs," with respect to lesser miracles, such as the healing of a lame man, or of a fever. Of the first, Acts 3:6 and 14:7; of the second, however, the last chapter of Acts. By "wonders," as to the greater things, such as the raising of the dead. Acts 9:40: "Tabitha, arise," etc. Now "portent" is so called as if "stretched forth" or "stretched afar," namely because it shows something at a distance. 2 Par. 32:31: "In the embassy of the princes of Babylon, who had been sent to him, to inquire concerning the wonder, namely that the sun had gone backward," etc. The chief wonder, however, is that God was made man. Is. 8:18: "I and my children, whom God hath given me for a wonder" — namely, that I am man, and that my children would believe this. For it was a wonder that the human heart could believe this.

He says "by various powers" so that signs and wonders may be referred to those things which exceed the power of nature. So that a "sign" is called what is beyond and above nature, yet not contrary to it; but a "wonder" is what is contrary to nature, such as the childbirth of a virgin, the raising of the dead. But "power" is referred to those things which are according to nature as to the substance of the deed, but not as to the manner of its being done, as the healing of a fever, which indeed physicians can do, though not instantly. Or "powers" may be referred to the powers of the mind, which the Lord gave to his preachers, namely faith, hope, and charity.

But as to the second, namely as to the gifts, he says "and by distributions of the Holy Spirit." But on the contrary, as it is said in Wisdom 7: "the Holy Spirit is one." How then is he distributed? It must be said that he is not distributed according to essence, but insofar as his gifts are distributed. 1 Cor. 12:4: "There are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit." Now all graces are attributed to the Holy Spirit, because they are given out of love. Love, however, is appropriated to the Holy Spirit. Gregory: "Surely the Holy Spirit is love." Or "by distributions," that is, through the distributions which are made by the Holy Spirit, because to one is given the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, and so of the others. And all this not according to merits, nor from the necessity of nature, but through his own will. John 3:8: "The spirit breathes where he wills," etc., and 1 Cor. 12:11: "All these things one and the same spirit works," etc. Mark, last chapter: "The Lord cooperating, and confirming the word with signs that followed."