George Leo Haydock, on Jdt 10:4

And. Greek, “and she was richly adorned, so that she might captivate (literally, deceive) the eyes of whatever men should behold her. And,” ver. 5. (Haydock) — The fathers highly extol her virtue, and she was, no doubt, actuated by the purest motives. Yet she might be guilty of some indiscretion. Even the working of miracles would not prove the contrary, as wicked priests may confer the sacraments; and Moses was reprehensible the moment (Calmet) before (Haydock) he wrought a miracle, Numbers xx. 10., and Matthew vii. 22. God inspired her with the laudable design of freeing her country, but the means were left to her own choice. (Calmet) — The making use of this rich attire was not, however, sinful in itself; and we have no right to suspect that Judith gave any way either to vanity or to sensuality. How many ladies of quality are dressed so as to enchant all those who are not upon their guard! Yet, provided they observe due modesty, who will blame their rich attire or perfumes? (Haydock) — Judith might lawfully desire to marry Holofernes for the good of her nation, (Menochius) as Esther became the wife of Assuerus, though an infidel. The general seemed even willing to become a convert, chap. xi. 21. (Haydock) — God bore witness to the holy intention of Judith in adorning herself. (Witham)