The interpretation timeline

Jdt 10:4

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

Jdt 10:4 · Douay-Rheims
“And the Lord also gave her more beauty: because all this dressing up did not proceed from sensuality, lent from virtue: and therefore the Lord increased this her beauty, so that she appeared to all men’s eyes incomparably lovely.”
Post-Reformation c. 1650 – 1900
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“And. Greek, “and she was richly adorned, so that she might captivate (literally, deceive) the eyes of whatever men should behold her. And,” ver. 5. (Haydock) — The fathers highly extol her virtue, and she was, no doubt, actuated by the purest motives. Yet she might be guilty of some indiscretion. Even the working of miracles would not prove the contrary, as wicked priests may confer the sacraments; and Moses was reprehensible the moment (Calmet) before (Haydock) he wrought a miracle, Numbers xx. 10., and Matthew vii. 22. God inspired her with the laudable design of freeing her country, but the means were left to her own choice. (Calmet) — The making use of this rich attire was not, however, sinful in itself; and we have no right to suspect that Judith gave any way either to vanity or to sensuality. How many ladies of quality are dressed so as to enchant all those who are not upon their guard! Yet, provided they observe due modesty, who will blame their rich attire or perfumes? (Haydock) — Judith might lawfully desire to marry Holofernes for the good of her nation, (Menochius) as Esther became the wife of Assuerus, though an infidel. The general seemed even willing to become a convert, chap. xi. 21. (Haydock) — God bore witness to the holy intention of Judith in adorning herself. (Witham)”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.