Source · the work in full

The Great Commentary (Mossman/Cobb English)

PD · tr. Thomas W. Mossman and W. F. Cobb, 1876–1908
Chapter 16

Mark 16

Who was crucified: He is risen; He is not here. “The angel is not ashamed of the cross,” says Theophylact, “ for in it is the salvation of men.” The Interlinear says, “The cross’s bitter root is gone ; the flower of life with its fruits, which lay in death, has arisen in glory.” Go, tell His disciples. “The women are bid,” says the Inter - linear, “to announce it to the Apostles, because as by a woman (Eve) death was announced, by a woman it might be told that life had risen again.” THE RESURRECTION. 443 And Peter. “ That him whom a woman had made deny, a woman might make confess,” says Druthmar. The Scholiast in S. Jerome adds that “ Peter was named especially because he counted himself unworthy of being a disciple, because he had thrice denied his Master.” And S. Gregory {Horn. 21, in Evang.) says, “If the angel had not named Peter, he would not have dared to come among the disciples. He is called, therefore, by name, that he might not despair.”

For a trembling (of body) and fear (of mind) had seized them. Theophylact says, “ ?x<rra<r/$, that is, stupor, at the sight of the angel had come on them.” But this astonishment was mingled with intense joy. For they were astounded and were glad at the wonderful things which they heard, even that Jesus their beloved was risen from the dead. For they were afraid. Not only because of the vision of angels, but also “ on account of the Jews,” says Euthymius, “ lest they should appear to have themselves stolen away Jesus; lest they should kill them when they heard that they had proclaimed the resurrection of Jesus: as shortly afterwards the Jews placed Mary Magdalene, Martha, and Lazarus in a ship without oars or sail, and sent them to what would have been certain destruction had not God brought them in safety to Marseilles.”

Magdalene , out of whom He had cast seven devils . Mark adds this to show the power of repentance and love. With these was Magdalene the sinner so inflamed, that she deserved first to see Christ risen again, that from her sinners might learn not to despair, but vehemently to love; for so they shall surpass the Holy Innocents in grace and glory. So Bede, “Because where sin abounded, grace hath superabounded. ” Bede adds, “A woman was the beginner of transgression. A woman first tasted death, but in Magdalene woman first saw the resurrection, that woman might not bear the perpetual guilt of transgression among men.” See what is said on Luke viii. 2

He appeartd in another shape: Arabic, garment ie. 9 of a traveller, as they were going into the country: Arabic, to 444 S. MARK, C. XVI. the village ; Gr. into the field, i.e., to a country-house at Emmaus. For, as S. Austin says (Consens. Evang .), “under the name of country not only villages, but towns and boroughs outside the capital, which was the mother city of all, were wont to be called.” These disciples, therefore, were going from Jerusalem into the country, that is, into the neighbouring small town of Emmaus. This place was made a famous city by the Romans, and called Nicopolis, as a monument of their victory in the capture of Jerusalem. This appearance of Christ is the same as that related by S. Luke (xxiv. 13), as is plain from the circumstances, which are the same in both cases. So commentators generally. Euthymius alone thinks they were different, because Mark adds that the Apostles did not believe them when they told them that Christ was risen, whilst Luke intimates the contrary, that they did believe. But the answer is easy, that some believed, but others did not believe

Neither did they believe them . This happened by the permission and providence of God. “For this their incredulity w^s not so much their weakness as it was to become our strength,” says S. Gregory. “For the resurrection itself was made manifest to them by many proofs, when they doubted of it And when we read and acknowledge these things, what else is it but to be confirmed by their doubting ? ”

At length He appeared to the eleven as they were at table, . The Vulgate has novissime , last of all: Gr. Dorcpo*. This was the last appearance of Christ on the day of the resurrection, for S. Mark only relates those appearances which took place on that day. You may say, But if so, He did not appear to the Eleven, but to the Apostles, for S. Thomas was absent Wherefore Maldonatus thinks that this appearance was that which took place on the Sunday after the resurrection, when Thomas was present But I say that they are here called the Eleven, although Thomas was absent, because the college of the Apostles after the treachery of Judas was reduced to eleven. That is why they are here called the Eleven, although Thomas GO INTO ALL THE WORLD. 445 was absent Thus the Decemvirs were called by that name when gathered together, although one or two might be absent They did not believe. S. Jerome (lib. a, coni. Pelag.) writes that in some Greek codices there is found added after these words as follows: “And they had content, saying, Substance is that world of iniquity which by means of evil spirits suffers not the true power of God to be apprehended : therefore now reveal Thy righteousness.” But the Church has expunged all this, for it savours of the heresy of Manes and Montanus

And He said unto them , Go ye into the whole worlds and preach the Gospel to every creature. He said this not on Easter day, when He appeared to the Eleven as they sat at meat, but afterwards, when He showed Himself to them and others on a mountain of Galilee, as it is in S. Matt, xxviii. 16, &c. Or it may be that He committed this chief and peculiar office of preaching the Gospel to the Apostles more than once. Go ye into the whole world , that is to say, not into Judaea only, as ye have done hitherto, but up and down in all directions throughout the world. For it does not seem probable that a few Apostles should have traversed and converted the whole world, especially because in America, lately discovered, no traces of the faith of Christ have been found. Every creature , i.e., to all nations, as it is in Matt xxviii. 19

He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be condemned. This saying of Christ is abused to support their heresies, 1st, by the Lutherans, to prove that faith alone without good works is sufficient to salvation. But I reply that the meaning of Christ, as Euthymius, Theophylact, and others have observed, is, he that believeth , &c., i.e. y “he that, believing in Christ and receiving His baptism, has been washed from his sins, imbued with the grace of God, and sanctified, he shall be saved,” understand, “if he die in that state, retaining the grace of God even unto death.” But it is impossible for the baptized to continue in this state of grace if 446 S. MARK, C. XVI. they do not those good works which the law of Christ commands. Also, in the name of faith, or faith and baptism, , as the prime requisites, and which at the beginning of the Church were chiefly to be inculcated upon the Gentiles, all other things consequent upon them must be understood, such as hope, charity, and good works, as I have shown at length in the introduction to S. Paul’s Epistles. 2nd. The Anabaptists infer from this saying of Christ that little children must not be baptized, because they cannot believe. But I answer, Christ is here speaking of adults. For only adults are able to believe, and all the preceding words apply to adults only. That little children ought to be baptized is plain from the perpetual tradition and practice of the Church, and from the words in S. John iii. 5, “ Verily, verily, I say unto you, unless any one be bom of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” S. Augustine adds, and reiterates in various passages, that these words of Christ do refer to infants also in a measure, for as they sinned by the will of Adam, not their own, so likewise they believe by the faith of the Church, in their parents, or those who present them for baptism, not by their own. 3rd. The Calvinists gather from these words of Christ that baptism is not necessary for salvation, but that faith only is sufficient, because of it alone, they say, Christ subjoins, But he that believeth not shall be condemned I reply that under the word believe , i.e., faith, baptism must be understood, which is the sacrament of faith, as well as all the other things which spring from and follow faith, as I have just said. For Mark, studying brevity, left it to the reader to gather from what he had said immediately previous, that these must be understood, or shall not be baptized For otherwise the antithesis would be imperfect. To complete it we must read as follows, He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not, or is not baptized, shall be condemned For that baptism is necessary MIRACLES IN THE EARLY CHURCH. 447 for salvation is plain from the words of Christ in S. John iii. 5, already cited

You arrive at the cited line; the whole work is yours to read around it. The text is set from the cited public-domain edition.