The Great Commentary (Mossman/Cobb English)

And after that John was delivered up 9 Arc This was the second coming of Christ from Judsea into Galilee, that He might dee from Herod, lest he should cast Him also into prison. For Christ had been preaching and baptizing in Judsea. And the increase of His glory there had excited the envy of the Scribes and Pharisees, who denounced Him to Herod as though He were a revolutionist Wherefore this is the same coming of Christ as that mentioned in Matt iv. is, Luke iv. 14, and John iv. 3 and 43. Although some say that this last was a different one, and the third advent of Christ into Galilee, because Christ was then deeing from the Pharisees, as John says; but in His second coming He was deeing from Herod, as Matthew and Mark say. But, as I have observed, He ded from the Pharisees because He ded from Herod. For they had accused Him to Herod. Wherefore this was the same dight of Christ, and the same coming into Galilee

And there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit, i.e., a man having an unclean spirit, that is to say, possessed by a devil . The Greek has, in an unclean spirit , and it is a Hebraism. For the Hebrew uses 3 , beth, i.e., in , when one noun governs another in the genitive. And he cried out, Le., the spirit, by the mouth of the man possessed, “as though he were suffering torment,” says the Scholiast in S. Chrysostom, “as though in pain, as though not able to bear his strokes.” “For,” as Bede says, “the presence of the Saviour is the torment of the devils.” Christ desired that by this public testimony of the demon concerning Him, in the synagogue of Capernaum (for it is plain from ver. 21 that these things occurred there), the Jews who were gathered there might acknowledge Him to be Messias. There is nothing about this demoniac in Matthew, but there is in Luke iv. 33. Saying. The Gr. subjoins la, which the translator of Luke iv. 34 renders by let alone, as if the imperative of the verb ia«, Le., suffer, permit ; as Euthymius says, dismiss us. Others take la as an adverb of grieving, wondering, beseeching. As it were, “ Ah ! alas ! Lord, in what have I injured Thee?” THE DEVILS KNOW CHRIST. 371

What have we to do with Thee , , Jesus of Nazareth t Art Thou come to destroy usf I know who Thou art , the Holy One of God . “What is there between us and Thee, O Jesus? We have not attacked Thee, O Christ, who art holy ; but sinners, who are, as it were, our own. We have no contention with Thee ; do not Thou, then, contend with and destroy us.” Come to destroy us. Some MSS. add, before the time. But the words are not found in the Greek, Latin, Syriac, and Arabic received texts. They seem to have been transferred hither from S. Matt. ix. 25. With respect to the meaning, in the first place, Bede says that the demons, beholding the Lord upon earth, supposed that they were to be immediately judged. It was as though they said, “Do not Thou, O Jesus, by Thine advent bring on so quickly the day of judgment, and banish us to the bottomless pit without any hope of coming forth.” Second, the Scholiast in S. Chrysostom says, “Thou givest us no place among men when Thou teachest divine things.” But this is mystical. Third, and correctly, “Hast Thou come to destroy us, to cast us out from men, and send us to hell?” Whence Theophylact says, “ He calls going out of men his destruction.” For the highest pleasure of the devils is to possess and vex men. 1 know , &c. Arab. O Holy One ; the Gr. i &yio;, emphatically, the Holy One. “Thou who art so holy that Thou communicatest Thy holiness to others, since Thou art, as it were, the Fountain and the Sun of holiness, who sanctifiest all the saints, the Messiah and the Son of God, for whom all are eagerly waiting so many thousand years!” There is an allusion to Dan. ix. 24, “until the Holy of Holies, i.&, Messiah, be anointed.” 1 know , i.e., / suspect , / think. For, as the Scholiast in Chrysostom says, the devil had no firm and certain knowledge of the coming of God. Because, as S. Austin says (lib. 9, de Civ. c. 21), He only made known to them as much as He wished; and He only wished as much as was expedient

And Jesus threatened him: Gr. i.e., rebuked^ 372 S. MARK, C. L chided him with threats . That He would punish him unless he were silent Saying, Speak no more : Arab, shut thy mouth. Wherefore? I answer, First, Because it was not fitting that Christ should be commanded by the devil Second, That He might not appear to be a friend of the devil, and to hold intercourse with him. For afterwards it was objected to Christ that He cast out devils by the aid of Beelzebub. By acting as He did, Christ has taught us to shun all dealings with the devil ; for he is the sworn enemy of God, and is wholly bent upon injuring and destroying us, even when he promises or brings us any corporal aid. Wherefore, as the Scholiast in Chrysostom saith, “ Be silent ; let thy silence be My praise. Let not thy voice, but thy torments praise Me. I am not pleased that thou shouldst praise Me, but that thou shouldst go forth.” Third, To show that we should resist flattery, that it may not stir up any desire of vainglory in our breast Fourth, Euthymius says, “ He has taught us never to believe the demons, even when they say what is true. For since they love falsehood, and are most hostile to us, they never speak the truth except to deceive. They make use of the truth as it were a kind of bait” For, liars that they are, they conceal their lies by a colouring of truth. They say certain things that are true at the first, and afterwards interweave with them what is false, that those who have believed the first may believe also the last For this cause Paul drove out the spirit of Python, who praised him, Acts xvi. 18. Fifth, Because the demon in an unseasonable manner, and too speedily, disclosed that Christ was Messiah. For this might have injured Him, and turned the people away from Him. For so mighty a secret should be disclosed gradually, and the people be persuaded of its truth by many miracles ; for otherwise they would not at first receive it and believe it This was why (viii. 30) Christ forbids the Apostles also to say that He was Christ So Maldonatus and others. THE DEVIL'S RAGE. 373 Symbolically: Bede, “The devil, because he had deceived Eve with his tongue, is punished by the tongue, that he might not speak.”

And the unclean spirit tearing him, &c. Tearing (Vulg. discerpens), not by lacerating or mutilating the man who was possessed by him, for Luke says (iv. 35) that he did no harm to him, but by contorting and twisting his limbs this way and that, as if he wished to tear him piecemeal. For the Greek eragdrru signifies to pull or tear in pieces. The devil did this through rage and madness, that being compelled by Christ to go out of the man, he might injure him as much as he could. But the nearer and the more powerful the grace of Christ is, the more impotently does the devil rage. For, observe, the devil only raised a dreadful tempest, but one that was vain and ineffectual For he cannot hurt when Christ forbids. Christ permitted it for three reasons. 1. That it might be plain that this man was really possessed by the deviL 2. That the malice and wrath of the demon might be made apparent 3. That it might be clear that the demon went forth, not of his own will, but because he was compelled to do so by Christ Tropologically : S. Gregory teaches (Horn. 12, in Ezek.) that the devil wonderfully tempts and vexes sinners when they are converted. “As soon,” he says, “as the mind begins to love heavenly things, as soon as it collects itself for the vision of inward peace with its whole intention, that ancient adversary, who fell from heaven, is envious, and begins to lie in wait more insidiously, and brings to bear sharper temptations than he was wont, so as, for the most part, to try the soul which resists in a way that he had never tried her when he possessed her. Wherefore it is written, My son, if thou come to serve the Lord, stand fast in justice and fear, and prepare thy soul for temptation.” And crying out. With dreadful bowlings, shrieking, and roaring, to show how unwillingly he went out, and what great power was applied to him by Christ For he uttered no articulate speech. For Christ had forbidden him to speak when He said shut thy mouth. Thus Euthymius says, “Being scourged by the Lord's 374 S. MARK, C. L commands, he cried out with a loud voice, and yet he spake not when he cried, because he uttered cries which signified nothing.” Titus adds, “ When the man was restored to himself, then he uttered the speech of a man.”

What new doctrine is this, &c. “ What is this heavenly and divine doctrine, which indeed God confirms from heaven by so many and such mighty miracles? For Christ, the Teacher of this doctrine, not by prayers, but of His mere power, and by His command only, orders the devils to go out, and they obey Him . Wherefore this must, be the Messias, the Son of God, and the true God ; for He alone commands the devils by His power.”

And all the city (Capernaum, as appears from ver. 21) was gathered together at the door. Of the house of Peter and Andrew, where Jesus was being entertained, as is plain from ver. 29

And He healed many 9 i.e , 9 all who presented themselves, for they were many. Suffered not the devils to speak 9 because they knew Him . Arab., because they knew that He Himself was He

And rising very early 9 &c. : Gr. xai Le., in the morning , whilst it was still night For it was at the very first commencement of dawn, whilst it was yet dark. Thus it might be called night by S. Mark, although by S. Luke (iv. 42) it is called day 9 because the day was just about beginning to dawn. He went into a desert place 9 that He might pray thus more quietly and attentively. Wherefore it follows, and there prayed^ both that after so many miracles He might avoid the praise and applause of men, and to teach us to do the same. Learn here from Christ to give the early morning to prayer, and to rise up Christ's humility. 375 with the dawn, so as to have leisure for meditation, and to give the first-fruits of the day to God. For the dawn of day is a friend of the Muses, but a greater friend of God and the angels

And He strictly charged him. The Gr. is, And having threatened him, he straightway sent him out. He severely commanded him with threats to conceal the miracle of healing which He had just wrought ; and therefore He dismissed him, and sent him away from Him, that it might not be known that He had cured him of his leprosy ; and that this might afford us an example of avoiding the applause of men

Show thyself to the high priest (Vulg.). Gr. to the priest For not only the High Priest, but any priest might judge concerning leprosy, whether it was healed or no, as is plain from Lev. xiii. a. It is probable, however, that because the case of leprosy was so grave and difficult, the decision concerning it was, by the interpretation and decree of the pontiffs, reserved for a Chief Priest, as is here said, that is, for one of the twenty-four heads of the priests, who each in turn presided for a week over the rest of the priests, and the sacrifices, and the other offices and rites of the Temple, according to the institution of David, as appears from 1 Chron. xxiv. 3, &c

But he, being gone out, began to publish and to blase abroad the word, i.e., the fact of the miracle of his leprosy having been healed by Christ. For he thought that this was for the glory of God and Christ, although Christ, out of humility and modesty, had enjoined silence; but he himself did not consider this command binding upon him. So that he could not openly go into the city, without feeling His modesty hurt by the honour and applause of the people. Or could not may mean would not For so could is often put for would, as Nazianzen shows by many examples (Or at. 4, de Theolog.). 376 & MARK, c 11 CHAPTER IL I Christ healeth one sick of the palsy y 14 callcth Matthew from the receipt of custom , 15 eateth with publicans and sinners , 18 excuseth his disciples for not fasting , 23 and for plucking the ears of com on the Sabbath-day