And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not in loftiness of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of Christ.

“Nothing was ever more prepared for combat than the spirit of Paul; or rather, I should say, not his spirit, (for he was not himself the inventor of these things,) but, nothing was ever equal to the grace working within him, which overcometh all things. For sufficient indeed is what had been said before to cast down the pride of the boasters about wisdom; nay, even a part of it had been enough. But to enhance the splendor of the victory, he contends anew for the points which he had been affirming; trampling upon the prostrate foe. Look at it in this way: He had brought forward the prophecy which saith, "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise." He had shewn the wisdom of God, in that by means of what seemed to be foolishness, He destroyed the philosophy of the Gentiles; he had shewn that the "foolishness of God is wiser than men;" he had shewn that not only did He teach by untaught persons, but also chose untaught persons to learn of Him. Now he sheweth that both the thing itself which was preached, and the manner of preaching it, were enough to stagger people; and yet did not stagger them. As thus: "not only," saith he, "are the disciples uneducated, but I myself also, who am the preacher." Therefore he saith, "And I, brethren," (again he useth the word "brethren," to smooth down the harshness of the utterance,) "came not with excellency of speech, declaring unto you the testimony of God." "What then? tell me, hadst thou chosen to come 'with excellency,' wouldest thou have been able?" "I, indeed, had I chosen, should not have been able; but Christ, if He had chosen, was able. But He would not, in order that He might render His trophy more brilliant." Wherefore also in a former passage, shewing that it was His work which had been done, His will that the word should be preached in an unlearned manner, he said, "For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel; not with wisdom of words." But far greater, yea, infinitely greater, than Paul's willing this, is the fact that Christ willed it. "Not therefore," saith he, "by display of eloquence, neither armed with arguments from without, do I declare the testimony of God." He saith not "the preaching," but "the testimony of God;" which word was itself sufficient to withhold him. For he went about preaching death: and for this reason he added, "for I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified." This was the meaning he meant to convey, that he is altogether destitute of the wisdom which is without; as indeed he was saying above, "I came not with excellency of speech:" for that he might have possessed this also is plain; for he whose garments raised the dead and whose shadow expelled diseases, much more was his soul capable of receiving eloquence. For this is a thing which may be taught: but the former transcendeth all art. He then who knows things beyond the reach of art, much more must he have had strength for lesser things. But Christ permitted not; for it was not expedient. Rightly therefore he saith, "For I determined not to know any thing:" for I, too, for my part have just the same will as Christ. And to me it seems that he speaks to them in a lower tone even than to any others, in order to repress their pride. Thus, the expression, "I determined to know nothing," was spoken in contradistinction to the wisdom which is without. "For I came not weaving syllogisms nor sophisms, nor saying unto you anything else than Christ was crucified. They indeed have ten thousand things to say, and concerning ten thousand things they speak, winding out long courses of words, framing arguments and syllogisms, compounding sophisms without end. But I came unto you saying no other thing than 'Christ was crucified,' and all of them I out-stripped: which is a sign such as no words can express of the power of Him whom I preach."”

“Since the Apostle has shown what the fitting manner of Christian teaching is, here he shows that he himself observed that manner. And concerning this he does three things: first he shows that he did not make use among them of any secular excellence; second he shows among whom he employs spiritual excellence, at the place we speak wisdom, however, among the perfect, etc.; third he assigns the reason, at the place which also we speak, etc. Concerning the first he does three things. First he says that he did not display among them the excellence of secular wisdom; second, that he did not put forward the excellence of secular power, at the place and I in weakness; third, he did not put forward the excellence of eloquence, at the place and my speech. Concerning the first he does two things. First he sets forth what he intends; second he assigns the reason, at the place for I did not judge. He says therefore first: because it has been said that Christ sent me to evangelize not in wisdom of word, and that not many are wise, and I, brothers, although I have secular wisdom, according to that word of II Cor. 11:6: and even if unskilled in speech, yet not in knowledge, when I had come to you, to be converted to Christ, as is found in Acts 18:1, came announcing to you the testimony of Christ, according to that word of Acts 4:33: with great power the apostles rendered testimony of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and this not in loftiness of speech or of wisdom. Now the loftiness of wisdom is observed in the consideration of certain lofty things raised above the reason and sense of men. Ecclesiasticus 24:7: I have dwelt in the highest places. Now the loftiness of speech can be referred either to words signifying the conceptions of wisdom, according to that word of the last chapter of Ecclesiastes: the words of the wise are like goads, and like nails fixed deep, or to the manner of reasoning through certain subtle ways. For in Greek there is the word logos, which signifies both word and reason, as Jerome says. But the Apostle says this, because he did not wish to confirm the faith of Christ through loftinesses of this kind of speech or of wisdom. 1 Kings 2:3: do not multiply lofty things. Then he assigns the reason for this, saying for I did not judge myself to know anything, except Jesus Christ. For there was no need for this, that he should display wisdom, but that he should demonstrate power, according to that word of II Cor. 4:5: for we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ. And therefore he used only those things which pertained to demonstrating the power of Christ, esteeming himself as if he knew nothing except Jesus Christ. Jeremiah 9:24: let him who glories, glory in this, to know and understand me. But in Christ Jesus, as is said in Col. 2:3, are all the treasures of the wisdom and knowledge of God hidden, both as to the fullness of the deity and as to the fullness of wisdom and grace, and also as to the profound reasons of the incarnation, which however the Apostle did not announce to them but only those things which were more manifest and lower in Christ Jesus. And therefore he adds and this one crucified, as if he were to say: thus I showed myself to you as if I knew nothing else than the cross of Christ. Hence in the last chapter of Galatians he says: far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. Because, therefore, through the wisdom of word the cross of Christ is emptied, as has been said, therefore the Apostle himself had not come in loftiness of speech or of wisdom. Then when he says and I in weakness, etc., he shows that he did not put forward power among them, but rather the contrary, both outwardly and inwardly. Hence as to that which is outward he says and I was among you in weakness, that is, suffering tribulations among you. Galatians 4:11: you know that through weakness of the flesh I evangelized to you long ago. Psalm 15:4: their infirmities are multiplied. But as to that which is inward, he says and in fear, namely concerning the evils that were imminent, and trembling, inasmuch as interior fear overflows to the body. II Cor. 7:5: without were fightings, within were fears. Then when he says and my speech, he shows that he did not put forward among them the excellence of eloquence: and concerning this he does three things. First he excludes the undue manner of preaching, saying and my speech, namely that by which I instructed certain ones privately and individually, Eph. 4:29: let no evil speech proceed from your mouth, but if any is good, for the edification of the faith; and my preaching, namely that by which I taught publicly, was not in persuasive words of human wisdom, that is, through rhetoric, which arranges things for persuading. As namely he said above that it was not his intention that his preaching should rest upon philosophical reasonings, so now he says it was not his intention to rest upon rhetorical persuasions. Isaiah 33:19: you shall not see a shameless people, a people of lofty speech, so that you cannot understand the eloquence of its tongue, in which there is no wisdom. Second he shows the fitting manner which he used in preaching, saying: my speech was in the showing of the Spirit and of power, which indeed can be understood in two ways. In one way, as to this, that to those who believed his preaching the Holy Spirit was given, according to that word of Acts 10:44: while Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard the word. Likewise also he confirmed his preaching, by working powers, that is, miracles, according to that word of the last chapter of Mark: the word being confirmed by the signs that followed. Hence Galatians 3:5: he who bestows the Spirit on you, and works in you. In another way it can be understood as to this, that he himself spoke through the Spirit, which the loftiness and abundance of the teaching shows. II Kings 23:2: the Spirit of the Lord has spoken through me. And II Cor. 4:13: having the same spirit of faith, we believe, wherefore also we speak. He also confirms his preaching, by showing in his manner of life many virtuous works. I Thess. 2:10: for you are witnesses, and God, how holily and justly and without complaint we were present among you who believed. Third he assigns the reason for what has been said, saying that your faith may not be in the wisdom of men, that is, that it may not rest upon human wisdom, which very often deceives men, according to that word of Isaiah 47:10: your wisdom and your knowledge, this has deceived you. But in the power of God, namely that faith may rest upon the divine power, and so cannot fail. Romans 1:16: I am not ashamed of the Gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes. Then when he says we speak wisdom, etc., he shows among whom he employs the excellence of spiritual wisdom. And first he sets forth what he intends; second he makes clear his proposal, at the place but wisdom. He says therefore: among you I preached only Christ crucified, but wisdom, that is, profound teaching, we speak among the perfect. Now some are called perfect in two ways: in one way, according to the intellect; in another way according to the will. For these among the powers of the soul are proper to man, and therefore according to them the perfection of man must be considered. Now those are called perfect in intellect whose mind is raised above all carnal and sensible things, who are able to grasp spiritual and intelligible things, of whom it is said in Hebrews 5:14: solid food belongs to the perfect, to those who through practice have their senses trained for the discernment of good and evil. Now those are perfect according to the will whose will, raised above all temporal things, cleaves to God alone and to his precepts. Hence in Matthew 5:48, the commandments of love having been set forth, it is added: be perfect, as your heavenly Father also is perfect. Because, therefore, the teaching of faith is ordered to this, that faith may work through love, as is found in Galatians 5:6, it is necessary that he who is instructed in the teaching of faith be well disposed, not only according to the intellect, to grasp and believe, but also according to the will and affection, to be well disposed to love and to act. Then when he says but wisdom, etc., he explains what kind of wisdom it is of which he made mention. And first he sets forth the exposition; second he confirms the reason for the exposition, at the place which none of the princes, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he explains what this wisdom is by comparison to unbelievers; second, by comparison to believers, at the place but we speak the wisdom of God, etc. He says therefore first: it has been said that we speak wisdom among the perfect. But wisdom, I say, not of this age, that is, concerning secular matters, or which is through human reasonings; nor that of the princes of this age. And thus he separates it from worldly wisdom, both as to the manner and matter of inquiry, and as to the authors, who are the princes of this age; which can be understood of a threefold kind of princes, according to a threefold human wisdom. First, the princes of this age can be said to be kings and secular powerful men, according to that word of Psalm 2:2: the princes have gathered together as one against the Lord and against his Christ. From these princes comes the wisdom of human laws, through which the affairs of this world are administered in human life. Second, the demons can be called princes. John 14:30: the prince of this world comes, and he has nothing in me, etc. And from these princes comes the wisdom of the worship of demons, namely necromancy, and magic arts, and things of this kind. Third, the philosophers can be understood as the princes of this age, who showed themselves to men as it were princes in teaching, of whom it is said in Isaiah 19:11: the princes of Tanis are fools, the wise counselors of Pharaoh. And from these princes proceeded all human philosophy. Now of these, the men who are princes are destroyed through death and through the loss of power and authority; but the demons not through death, but through the loss of power and authority, according to that word of John 12:31: now the prince of this world shall be cast out; but of men it is said in Baruch 3:16: where are the princes of the nations? And afterward he adds: they have been destroyed and have gone down to the netherworld. As they themselves are not stable, so also their wisdom cannot be firm: and therefore one must not rely upon it. Then when he says but we speak, etc., he explains what kind of wisdom it is by comparison to believers. And first he describes it as to the matter or authority, when he says but we speak the wisdom of God, that is, which is God and from God. For although all wisdom is from God, as is said in Ecclesiasticus 1:1, yet in a certain special way this wisdom, which is about God, is also from God through revelation, according to that word of Wisdom 9:17: but who shall know your thought, unless you give wisdom and send your spirit from on high? Second he shows its quality, saying in mystery, which is hidden; for this wisdom is hidden from men, inasmuch as it exceeds the intellect of man, according to that word of Ecclesiasticus 3:25: very many things above the sense of man have been shown to you. Hence it is said in Job 28:21: it is hidden from the eyes of all the living. And because the manner of teaching and of the teaching must be fitting, therefore it is said that he speaks it in mystery, that is, in something hidden, whether by word or by sign. Below, 14:2: the spirit speaks mysteries. Third he shows the fruit of this wisdom, saying which God predestined, that is, prepared, unto our glory, that is, of the preachers of the faith, to whom from the preaching of so lofty a wisdom great glory is owed, both with God and with men. Proverbs 3:35: the wise shall possess glory. And what he says, unto our glory, must be explained of all the faithful, whose glory this is, that in full light they may know those things which are now preached in mystery, according to that word of John 17:3: this is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

“And I, brethren , when I came to you , came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom. The Apostle here descends from the general to the particular. In other words : I said in the preceding chapter that God in preaching the Gospel willed not to use the wisdom of the wise in this world, but rejected it and scorned it, but willed by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe ; and therefore He chose not many noble or wise to spread the Gospel, but the low-born and untaught Apostles. From this I infer and say “ And t.e., and so I as one of the number of the Apostles, who, according to the election and will of God, did not use eloquence and worldly wisdom, was unwilling to use those means, and I came to you not in excellency but in simplicity of speech and wisdom”

“In this passage the apostle pursues his design, and reminds the Corinthians how he acted when he first preached the gospel among them. I. As to the matter or subject he tell us (Co1 2:2), He determined to know nothing among them but Jesus Christ and him crucified - to make a show of no other knowledge than this, to preach nothing, to discover the knowledge of nothing, but Jesus Christ, and him crucified. Note, Christ, in his person and offices, is the sum and substance of the gospel, and ought to be the great subject of a gospel minister's preaching. His business is to display the banner of the cross, and invite people under it. Any one that heard Paul preach found him to harp so continually on this string that he would say he knew nothing but Christ and him crucified. Whatever other knowledge he had, this was the only knowledge he discovered, and showed himself concerned to propagate among his hearers. II. The manner wherein he preached Christ is here also observable. 1. Negatively. He came not among them with excellency of speech or wisdom, Co1 2:1. His speech and preaching were not with enticing words of man's wisdom, Co1 2:4. He did not affect to appear a fine orator or a deep philosopher; nor did he insinuate himself into their minds, by a flourish of words, or a pompous show of deep reason and extraordinary science and skill. He did not set himself to captivate the ear by fine turns and eloquent expressions, nor to please and entertain the fancy with lofty flights of sublime notions. Neither his speech, nor the wisdom he taught, savoured of human skill: he learnt both in another school. Divine wisdom needed not to be set off with such human ornaments. 2. Positively. He came among them declaring the testimony of God, Co1 2:1. He published a divine revelation, and gave in sufficient vouchers for the authority of it, both by its consonancy to ancient predictions and by present miraculous operations; and there he left the matter. Ornaments of speech and philosophical skill and argument could add no weight to what came recommended by such authority. He was also among them in weakness and fear, and in much trembling; and yet his speech and preaching were in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, Co1 2:3, Co1 2:4. His enemies in the church of Corinth spoke very contemptuously of him: His bodily presence, say they, is weak, and his speech contemptible, Co2 10:10. Possibly he had a little body, and a low voice; but, though he had not so good an elocution as some, it is plain that he was no mean speaker. The men of Lystra looked on him to be the heathen god Mercury, come down to them in the form of a man, because he was the chief speaker, Act 14:12. Nor did he want courage nor resolution to go through his work; he was in nothing terrified by his adversaries. Yet he was no boaster. He did not proudly vaunt himself, like his opposers. He acted in his office with much modesty, concern, and care. He behaved with great humility among them; not as one grown vain with the honour and authority conferred on him, but as one concerned to approve himself faithful, and fearful of himself, lest he should mismanage in his trust. Observe, None know the fear and trembling of faithful ministers, who are zealous over souls with a godly jealousy; and a deep sense of their own weakness is the occasion of this fear and trembling. They know how insufficient they are, and are therefore fearful for themselves. But, though Paul managed with this modesty and concern, yet he spoke with authority: In the demonstration of the Spirit and of power. He preached the truths of Christ in their native dress, with plainness of speech. He laid down the doctrine as the Spirit delivered it; and left the Spirit, by his external operation in signs and miracles, and his internal influences on the hearts of men, to demonstrate the truth of it, and procure its reception. III. Here is the end mentioned for which he preached Christ crucified in this manner: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of man, but the power of God (Co1 2:5) - that they might not be drawn by human motives, nor overcome by mere human arguments, lest it should be said that either rhetoric or logic had made them Christians. But, when nothing but Christ crucified was plainly preached, the success must be founded, not on human wisdom, but divine evidence and operation. The gospel was so preached that God might appear and be glorified in all.”

“And I, brethren, when I came to you,.... This account the apostle gives of himself is occasioned, either by what he had said in the latter part of the preceding chapter, concerning the choice God has made of the foolish, weak, base, and despicable things of the world, and of his calling them by his grace both to fellowship with the saints in common, and therefore he accommodated his ministry unto them, and in particular to the ministry of the word, of which he himself was a like instance and an example; or else by what he had declared in Co1 1:17 of the same chapter, that he was sent to preach the Gospel, not with wisdom of words; which he here reassumes, and affirms agreeably, that when he first came to Corinth, he came not with excellency of speech, or of wisdom; for though he was not only versed in Jewish learning, being brought up at the feet of Gamaliel; but had also a good share of Grecian literature, and was capable, upon proper occasions, to cite the Greek poets, as he does Aratus, Act 17:28 and Menander, Tit 1:12 and so could, had he thought fit, have adorned his discourses with pompous language, with the flowers of rhetoric, and the eloquence of the Grecians; yet he chose not such a high and florid style, and which savoured so much of human wisdom and art; for the subject he treated of required no such dress, nor any great swelling words of vanity, or a bombast style to set it off, and gain the applause and assent of men: for what he delivered were plain matters of fact, attested by God himself, declaring unto you the testimony of God; that is, the Gospel, which bears a testimony to the love, grace, and mercy of God, his kindness and good will to the sons of men, in giving and sending his only begotten Son to be the Saviour and Redeemer of them; and in which God bears a testimony of his Son, of his sonship, deity, mediation, incarnation, obedience, sufferings, and death, of his resurrection, ascension to heaven, session at his right hand, intercession for his people, and his second coming to judgment, and of eternal life and salvation by him. All which being matter of fact, and depending upon the witness of God, which is greater than that of men, needed no art nor oratory of men to recommend it: it was enough in plain words, and easy language, to declare it, with the evidence by which it was supported. The Alexandrian copy, and some others, read, "the mystery" of God: and so the Syriac version , "the mystery of God" one of Stephens's copies reads, "the mystery of Christ"; and the Vulgate Latin version, "the testimony of Christ".”

“When I came to you - Acting suitably to my mission, which was to preach the Gospel, but not with human eloquence, Co1 1:17. I declared to you the testimony, the Gospel, of God, not with excellency of speech, not with arts of rhetoric, used by your own philosophers, where the excellence of the speech recommends the matter, and compensates for the want of solidity and truth: on the contrary, the testimony concerning Christ and his salvation is so supremely excellent, as to dignify any kind of language by which it may be conveyed. See the Introduction, Section 2.”