And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling.

“"And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling." This again is another topic: for not only are the believers unlearned persons; not only is he that speaketh unlearned; not only is the manner of the teaching of an unlearned cast throughout; not only was the thing preached of itself enough to stagger people; (for the cross and death were the message brought;) but together with these there were also other hindrances, the dangers, and the plots, and the daily fear, and the being hunted about. For the word "weakness," with him in many places stands for the persecutions: as also elsewhere. "My weakness which I had in my flesh ye did not set at nought:" (Galatians 4:13-14) and again, "If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern my weakness." (2 Corinthians 11:30) What weakness? "The governor under Aretas the king guarded the city of the Damascenes, desirous to apprehend me." (2 Corinthians 5:32) And again, "Wherefore I take pleasure in weakness:" (2 Corinthians 12:10) then, saying in what, he added, "In injuries, in necessities, in distresses." And here he makes the same statement; for having said, "And I was in weakness," etc. he did not stop at this point, but explaining the word "weakness" makes mention of his dangers. He adds again, "and in fear, and in much trembling, I was with you." "How sayest thou? Did Paul also fear dangers?" He did fear, and dreaded them excessively; for though he was Paul, yet he was a man. But this is no charge against Paul, but infirmity of human nature; and it is to the praise of his fixed purpose of mind that when he even dreaded death and stripes, he did nothing wrong because of this fear. So that they who assert that he feared not stripes, not only do not honor him, but rather abridge greatly his praises. For if he feared not, what endurance or what self-restraint was there in bearing the dangers? I, for my part, on this account admire him; because being in fear, and not simply in "fear," but even in "trembling" at his perils, he so ran as ever to keep his crown; and gave not in for any danger, in his task of purging out the world, and everywhere both by sea and land sowing the Gospel.”

“Since the Apostle has shown what the fitting manner of Christian teaching is, here he shows that he himself observed that manner. And concerning this he does three things: first he shows that he did not make use among them of any secular excellence; second he shows among whom he employs spiritual excellence, at the place we speak wisdom, however, among the perfect, etc.; third he assigns the reason, at the place which also we speak, etc. Concerning the first he does three things. First he says that he did not display among them the excellence of secular wisdom; second, that he did not put forward the excellence of secular power, at the place and I in weakness; third, he did not put forward the excellence of eloquence, at the place and my speech. Concerning the first he does two things. First he sets forth what he intends; second he assigns the reason, at the place for I did not judge. He says therefore first: because it has been said that Christ sent me to evangelize not in wisdom of word, and that not many are wise, and I, brothers, although I have secular wisdom, according to that word of II Cor. 11:6: and even if unskilled in speech, yet not in knowledge, when I had come to you, to be converted to Christ, as is found in Acts 18:1, came announcing to you the testimony of Christ, according to that word of Acts 4:33: with great power the apostles rendered testimony of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and this not in loftiness of speech or of wisdom. Now the loftiness of wisdom is observed in the consideration of certain lofty things raised above the reason and sense of men. Ecclesiasticus 24:7: I have dwelt in the highest places. Now the loftiness of speech can be referred either to words signifying the conceptions of wisdom, according to that word of the last chapter of Ecclesiastes: the words of the wise are like goads, and like nails fixed deep, or to the manner of reasoning through certain subtle ways. For in Greek there is the word logos, which signifies both word and reason, as Jerome says. But the Apostle says this, because he did not wish to confirm the faith of Christ through loftinesses of this kind of speech or of wisdom. 1 Kings 2:3: do not multiply lofty things. Then he assigns the reason for this, saying for I did not judge myself to know anything, except Jesus Christ. For there was no need for this, that he should display wisdom, but that he should demonstrate power, according to that word of II Cor. 4:5: for we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ. And therefore he used only those things which pertained to demonstrating the power of Christ, esteeming himself as if he knew nothing except Jesus Christ. Jeremiah 9:24: let him who glories, glory in this, to know and understand me. But in Christ Jesus, as is said in Col. 2:3, are all the treasures of the wisdom and knowledge of God hidden, both as to the fullness of the deity and as to the fullness of wisdom and grace, and also as to the profound reasons of the incarnation, which however the Apostle did not announce to them but only those things which were more manifest and lower in Christ Jesus. And therefore he adds and this one crucified, as if he were to say: thus I showed myself to you as if I knew nothing else than the cross of Christ. Hence in the last chapter of Galatians he says: far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. Because, therefore, through the wisdom of word the cross of Christ is emptied, as has been said, therefore the Apostle himself had not come in loftiness of speech or of wisdom. Then when he says and I in weakness, etc., he shows that he did not put forward power among them, but rather the contrary, both outwardly and inwardly. Hence as to that which is outward he says and I was among you in weakness, that is, suffering tribulations among you. Galatians 4:11: you know that through weakness of the flesh I evangelized to you long ago. Psalm 15:4: their infirmities are multiplied. But as to that which is inward, he says and in fear, namely concerning the evils that were imminent, and trembling, inasmuch as interior fear overflows to the body. II Cor. 7:5: without were fightings, within were fears. Then when he says and my speech, he shows that he did not put forward among them the excellence of eloquence: and concerning this he does three things. First he excludes the undue manner of preaching, saying and my speech, namely that by which I instructed certain ones privately and individually, Eph. 4:29: let no evil speech proceed from your mouth, but if any is good, for the edification of the faith; and my preaching, namely that by which I taught publicly, was not in persuasive words of human wisdom, that is, through rhetoric, which arranges things for persuading. As namely he said above that it was not his intention that his preaching should rest upon philosophical reasonings, so now he says it was not his intention to rest upon rhetorical persuasions. Isaiah 33:19: you shall not see a shameless people, a people of lofty speech, so that you cannot understand the eloquence of its tongue, in which there is no wisdom. Second he shows the fitting manner which he used in preaching, saying: my speech was in the showing of the Spirit and of power, which indeed can be understood in two ways. In one way, as to this, that to those who believed his preaching the Holy Spirit was given, according to that word of Acts 10:44: while Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard the word. Likewise also he confirmed his preaching, by working powers, that is, miracles, according to that word of the last chapter of Mark: the word being confirmed by the signs that followed. Hence Galatians 3:5: he who bestows the Spirit on you, and works in you. In another way it can be understood as to this, that he himself spoke through the Spirit, which the loftiness and abundance of the teaching shows. II Kings 23:2: the Spirit of the Lord has spoken through me. And II Cor. 4:13: having the same spirit of faith, we believe, wherefore also we speak. He also confirms his preaching, by showing in his manner of life many virtuous works. I Thess. 2:10: for you are witnesses, and God, how holily and justly and without complaint we were present among you who believed. Third he assigns the reason for what has been said, saying that your faith may not be in the wisdom of men, that is, that it may not rest upon human wisdom, which very often deceives men, according to that word of Isaiah 47:10: your wisdom and your knowledge, this has deceived you. But in the power of God, namely that faith may rest upon the divine power, and so cannot fail. Romans 1:16: I am not ashamed of the Gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes. Then when he says we speak wisdom, etc., he shows among whom he employs the excellence of spiritual wisdom. And first he sets forth what he intends; second he makes clear his proposal, at the place but wisdom. He says therefore: among you I preached only Christ crucified, but wisdom, that is, profound teaching, we speak among the perfect. Now some are called perfect in two ways: in one way, according to the intellect; in another way according to the will. For these among the powers of the soul are proper to man, and therefore according to them the perfection of man must be considered. Now those are called perfect in intellect whose mind is raised above all carnal and sensible things, who are able to grasp spiritual and intelligible things, of whom it is said in Hebrews 5:14: solid food belongs to the perfect, to those who through practice have their senses trained for the discernment of good and evil. Now those are perfect according to the will whose will, raised above all temporal things, cleaves to God alone and to his precepts. Hence in Matthew 5:48, the commandments of love having been set forth, it is added: be perfect, as your heavenly Father also is perfect. Because, therefore, the teaching of faith is ordered to this, that faith may work through love, as is found in Galatians 5:6, it is necessary that he who is instructed in the teaching of faith be well disposed, not only according to the intellect, to grasp and believe, but also according to the will and affection, to be well disposed to love and to act. Then when he says but wisdom, etc., he explains what kind of wisdom it is of which he made mention. And first he sets forth the exposition; second he confirms the reason for the exposition, at the place which none of the princes, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he explains what this wisdom is by comparison to unbelievers; second, by comparison to believers, at the place but we speak the wisdom of God, etc. He says therefore first: it has been said that we speak wisdom among the perfect. But wisdom, I say, not of this age, that is, concerning secular matters, or which is through human reasonings; nor that of the princes of this age. And thus he separates it from worldly wisdom, both as to the manner and matter of inquiry, and as to the authors, who are the princes of this age; which can be understood of a threefold kind of princes, according to a threefold human wisdom. First, the princes of this age can be said to be kings and secular powerful men, according to that word of Psalm 2:2: the princes have gathered together as one against the Lord and against his Christ. From these princes comes the wisdom of human laws, through which the affairs of this world are administered in human life. Second, the demons can be called princes. John 14:30: the prince of this world comes, and he has nothing in me, etc. And from these princes comes the wisdom of the worship of demons, namely necromancy, and magic arts, and things of this kind. Third, the philosophers can be understood as the princes of this age, who showed themselves to men as it were princes in teaching, of whom it is said in Isaiah 19:11: the princes of Tanis are fools, the wise counselors of Pharaoh. And from these princes proceeded all human philosophy. Now of these, the men who are princes are destroyed through death and through the loss of power and authority; but the demons not through death, but through the loss of power and authority, according to that word of John 12:31: now the prince of this world shall be cast out; but of men it is said in Baruch 3:16: where are the princes of the nations? And afterward he adds: they have been destroyed and have gone down to the netherworld. As they themselves are not stable, so also their wisdom cannot be firm: and therefore one must not rely upon it. Then when he says but we speak, etc., he explains what kind of wisdom it is by comparison to believers. And first he describes it as to the matter or authority, when he says but we speak the wisdom of God, that is, which is God and from God. For although all wisdom is from God, as is said in Ecclesiasticus 1:1, yet in a certain special way this wisdom, which is about God, is also from God through revelation, according to that word of Wisdom 9:17: but who shall know your thought, unless you give wisdom and send your spirit from on high? Second he shows its quality, saying in mystery, which is hidden; for this wisdom is hidden from men, inasmuch as it exceeds the intellect of man, according to that word of Ecclesiasticus 3:25: very many things above the sense of man have been shown to you. Hence it is said in Job 28:21: it is hidden from the eyes of all the living. And because the manner of teaching and of the teaching must be fitting, therefore it is said that he speaks it in mystery, that is, in something hidden, whether by word or by sign. Below, 14:2: the spirit speaks mysteries. Third he shows the fruit of this wisdom, saying which God predestined, that is, prepared, unto our glory, that is, of the preachers of the faith, to whom from the preaching of so lofty a wisdom great glory is owed, both with God and with men. Proverbs 3:35: the wise shall possess glory. And what he says, unto our glory, must be explained of all the faithful, whose glory this is, that in full light they may know those things which are now preached in mystery, according to that word of John 17:3: this is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

“And I was with you in weakness: that is, in anxieties, tribulation, and persecution ; and in fear and much trembling, because of the hostility of the persecuting Jews and Gentiles. S. Chrysostom and Anselm remark that the Apostle in his Second Epistle (xi. 30 and xii. 5, 9, 10), and elsewhere, gives the name of weakness to the anxiety he suffered from dangers, plots, exile, daily terrors, calumnies, and hatreds. And also, that Paul suffered great anxieties and persecutions at Corinth, is evident in that he needed to be strengthened against them by Christ in a vision (Acts xviii. 9). Moreover, shortly afterwards the Jews there stirred up a tumult against Paul, and dragged him to the judgment-seat of Gallio, the deputy of Achaia, and publicly beat Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, before him”

“And I was with you in weakness,.... Meaning either the weakness of his bodily presence, the contemptibleness of his voice, and the mean figure he made as a preacher among them, both with respect to the matter and manner of his ministry in the eyes of many; or his lowly and humble deportment among them, not exerting the power and authority Christ had given him as an apostle; but choosing rather to work with his own hands, as he did at Corinth, to minister to his own necessities, and those of others; or the many persecutions which he endured there for the sake of preaching a crucified Christ; and which he sometimes calls "infirmities"; see Co2 12:9 wherefore it is added, and in fear, and in much trembling: not only on account of the greatness and awfulness of the work in which he was engaged, and lest the souls he ministered unto should be drawn aside from the truth, and into a sinful compliance; but because of the violence of men against him, threatening his life, and lying in wait for it: hence, the Lord, to encourage him, spake in a vision to him, and bid him not be afraid, but boldly preach his Gospel, and not be silent; assuring him of his presence, and that no man should set on him to hurt him, for he had many chosen vessels there to call by his grace through his ministry, Act 18:9 which no doubt greatly served to remove the fears and tremor that attended him.”

“I was with you in weakness - It is very likely that St. Paul had not only something in his speech very unfavourable to a ready and powerful elocution, but also some infirmity of body that was still more disadvantageous to him. A fine appearance and a fine voice cover many weaknesses and defects, and strongly and forcibly recommend what is spoken, though not remarkable for depth of thought or solidity of reasoning. Many popular orators have little besides their persons and their voice to recommend them. Louis XIV. styled Peter du Bosc le plus beau parleur de son royaume, the finest speaker in his kingdom; and among his own people he was styled l'orateur parfait, the perfect orator. Look at the works of this French protestant divine, and you find it difficult to subscribe to the above sayings. The difficulty is solved by the information that the person of M. du Bosc was noble and princely, and his voice full, harmonious, and majestic. Paul had none of these advantages, and yet idolatry and superstition fell before him. Thus God was seen in the work, and the man was forgotten. In fear, and in much trembling - This was often the state of his mind; dreading lest he should at any time be unfaithful, and so grieve the Spirit of God; or that, after having preached to others, himself should be a castaway. See Co1 9:27. An eminent divine has said that it requires three things to make a good preacher; study, temptation, and prayer. The latter, no man that lives near to God can neglect; the former, no man who endeavors rightly to divide the word of truth will neglect; and with the second every man will be more or less exercised whose whole aim is to save souls. Those of a different cast the devil permits to pass quietly on in their own indolent and prayerless way.”

“In weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling. We must not think, says St. Chrysostom, that this made the virtue of St. Paul less commendable. It is natural to every man to fear persecutions and torments. We admire the apostle, who amidst these fears, was always ready to expose himself, was always fighting, and always victorious. (Witham) — During the stay I made with you at Corinth, I saw myself daily exposed to injuries, affronts, and persecutions. I had then the opportunity of practising the lessons which our expiring Redeemer delivered to us from the wood on which he died, and the daily contradictions I met with obliged me to think of other things than fine discourses, and elegant harangues. (Theophylactus)”

“On account of the persecutions of the Jews. Acts xviii. 12. " Did Paul fear dangers ? Undoubtedly he feared them, and his fear was great : for al- though he was Paul, he was, nevertheless, a man. This was no dishonour to Paul ; it was the weakness of nature, and it affords evidence of his strong deter- mination, since although he feared death and stripes, under the influence of fear he did nothing unworthy of himself." St. Chrysostom.”

“I--the preacher: as Co1 2:2 describes the subject, "Christ crucified," and Co1 2:4 the mode of preaching: "my speech . . . not with enticing words," "but in demonstration of the Spirit." weakness--personal and bodily (Co2 10:10; Co2 12:7, Co2 12:9; Gal 4:13). trembling--(compare Phi 2:12). Not personal fear, but a trembling anxiety to perform a duty; anxious conscientiousness, as proved by the contrast to "eye service" (Eph 6:5) [CONYBEARE and HOWSON].”