But these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollo, for your sakes; that in us you may learn, that one be not puffed up against the other for another, above that which is written.

“"Now these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes; that in us ye might learn not to think of men above that which is written." So long as there was need of expressions as harsh as these, he refrained from drawing up the curtain, and went on arguing as if he were himself the person to whom they were addressed; in order that the dignity of the persons censured tending to counteract the censurers, no room might be left for flying out in wrath at the charges. But when the time came for a gentler process, then he strips it off, and removes the mask, and shows the persons concealed by the appellation of Paul and Apollos. And on this account he said, "These things, brethren, I have transferred in a figure unto myself and Apollos." And as in the case of the sick, when the child being out of health kicks and turns away from the food offered by the physicians, the attendants call the father or the tutor, and bid them take the food from the physician's hands and bring it, so that out of fear towards them he may take it and be quiet: so also Paul, intending to censure them about certain other persons, of whom some, he thought, were injured, others honored above measure, did not set down the persons themselves, but conducted the argument in his own name and that of Apollos, in order that reverencing these they might receive his mode of cure. But that once received, he presently makes known in whose behalf he was so expressing himself. Now this was not hypocrisy, but condescension and tact. For if he had said openly, "As for you, the men whom ye are judging are saints, and worthy of all admiration;" they might have taken it ill and started back. But now in saying, "But to me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you:" and again, "Who is Paul, and who is Apollos?" he rendered his speech easy of reception. This, if you mark it, is the reason why he says here, "These things have I transferred in a figure unto myself for your sakes, that in us ye may learn not to be wise above what is written," signifying that if he had applied his argument in their persons, they would not have learnt all that they needed to learn, nor would have admitted the correction, being vexed at what was said. But as it was, revering Paul, they bore the rebuke well. But what is the meaning of, "not to be wise above what is written?" It is written, "Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brothers's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" and "Judge not, that ye be not judged." For if we are one and are mutually bound together, it behooveth us not to rise up against one another. For "he that humbleth himself shall be exalted," saith he. And "He that will be first of all, let him be the servant of all." These are the things which "are written." "That no one of you be puffed up for one against another." Again, having dismissed the teachers, he rebukes the disciples. For it was they who caused the former to be elated. And besides, the leaders would not quietly receive that kind of speech because of their desire of outward glory: for they were even blinded with that passion. Whereas the disciples, as not reaping themselves the fruits of the glory, but procuring it for others, would both endure the chiding with more temper, and had it more in their power than the leading men to destroy the disease. It seems then, that this also is a symptom of being "puffed up," to be elated on another's account, even though a man have no such feeling in regard of what is his own. For as he who is proud of another's wealth, is so out of arrogance; so also in the case of another's glory. And he hath well called it "being puffed up." For when one particular member rises up over the rest, it is nothing else but inflammation and disease; since in no other way doth one member become higher than another, except when a swelling takes place. And so in the body of the Church also; whoever is inflamed and puffed up, he must be the diseased one; for he is swollen above the proportion of the rest. For this disproportion is what we mean by "swelling." And so comes it to pass in the body, when some spurious and evil humor gathers, instead of the wonted nourishment. So also arrogance is born; notions to which we have no right coming over us. And mark with what literal propriety he saith, be not "puffed up:" for that which is puffed up hath a certain tumor of spirit, from being filled with corrupt humor. These things, however, he saith, not to preclude all soothing, but such soothing as leads to harm. "Wouldest thou wait upon this or that person? I forbid thee not: but do it not to the injury of another," For not that we might array ourselves one against another were teachers given us, but that we might all be mutually united. For so the general to this end is set over the host, that of those who are separate he may make one body. But if he is to break up the army, he stands in the place of an enemy rather than of a general.”

“After the apostle rebuked the Corinthians for the rashness by which they were judging the ministers of Christ, here he attacks their pride, by which they were despising the ministers of Christ. And concerning this he does three things. First he sets forth what he intends; second he assigns the reason, at the words *for who distinguishes you?* Third, speaking ironically, he mocks their contempt, at the words *you are already filled*. Concerning the first, it must be considered that the apostle above, wishing to check the contentions of the Corinthians which they were having on account of their ministers, had used the names of the good ministers of Christ, as above at I, 12 he said: *each one of you says: I indeed am of Paul, but I am of Apollo, and I am of Cephas*; and above at III, 22 where he said: *whether Paul, or Apollo, or Cephas*, and yet they were not glorying about the good ministers of Christ, nor were they dissenting on account of them, but on account of the pseudo-apostles, whom he did not wish to name, lest he should seem to speak against them out of hatred or envy; but in their place he had put his own name and the names of the other good preachers, and this is what he says, *now these things, brethren*, namely, what I said about the ministers, about whom you glory, and for whom you contend, *I have transferred*, that is, speaking figuratively, I have transferred, *to myself and Apollo*. For it says in Prov. I, 6: *they will attend to the parable and the interpretation, the words of the wise and their riddles*. And this *on account of you*, that is, for your benefit, II Cor. IV, 15: *all things are for your sake, that you may learn in yourselves*, lest one of you *be puffed up*, that is, become proud, against another, his neighbor, *for another*, namely for whichever minister of Christ, *above what is written*, that is, beyond the form described to you in what was said before. For it is said in Wis. IV, v. 19: *bursting them, puffed up, without voice*. Then, when he says *for who distinguishes you?*, he assigns the reason why one ought not to be puffed up against another. And first he sets down the reason, saying *for who distinguishes you?* This can be understood in two ways: in one way thus: who distinguishes you from the mass of the lost? You cannot distinguish yourself: hence you do not have in yourself grounds to be proud against another. And concerning this distinguishing it is said in Ps. XLII, 1: *judge me, O God, and distinguish my cause from an unholy nation*. In another way it can be understood, *who distinguishes you*, namely making you superior to your neighbor? This you cannot do, and hence you ought not to be proud against him. And concerning this distinguishing it is said in Eccli. XXXIII, 11: *in the great discipline of the Lord he separated them, and changed their ways*. But among men, insofar as they are faithful to Christ, there is no distinction, because, as is said in Rom. XII, 5, *we, being many, are one body in Christ*. And Peter says: *he makes no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith*. Second, he excludes a certain reasoning. For someone might be distinguished from the good or from the bad, being better than they on account of goods that he has, such as faith, wisdom, and the like. But the apostle excludes this, saying *what do you have that you have not received?* As if to say: nothing. For all goods are from God, according to that word of Ps. CIII, 28: *when you open your hand, all things will be filled with goodness*; and Par. XXIX, 14: *all things are yours, and what we have received from your hand, we have given back to you*. And from this he concludes his point, saying *but if you have received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it?* He therefore glories as one not receiving, who glories about himself, and not about God, as is said of certain persons in Ps. XLVIII, v. 7: *who trust in their own strength, and glory in the abundance of their riches*. And to this pertains the first species of pride, namely when someone, being proud, says that what he has he has from himself, according to that word of Ps. XI, 5: *our lips are our own, who is our lord?* But he glories as one receiving, who, ascribing all things to God, glories about him, as was said above: *he who glories, let him glory in the Lord*. To glory in this way is not to be proud, but to be humbled under God, to whom man gives glory, according to that word of Eccli. at the end: *to him who gives me wisdom, I will give glory*. Then, when he says *you are already filled*, he mocks their pride, since they were despising the apostles of Christ. And first in general, second in particular, at the words *we are fools*, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he mocks in them the fact that they presumed too much about themselves; second he derides in them the fact that they despised the apostles, at the words *for I think that God*, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he mocks them for the presumption by which they attributed to themselves what they did not have; second he mocks them for this, that they attributed to themselves alone what they did not have alone, at the words *you reign without us*. Now they attributed to themselves an abundance of goods, some of which are interior; and as to this he says *you are already filled*, that is, it seems to you that you are filled, that is, abundantly refreshed with spiritual sweetness, of which it is said in Ps. XVI, 15: *I shall be satisfied when your glory shall be manifested*. But it could truly be said to them that you are already filled, not with fullness, but with disgust, according to that word of Prov. XXVII, 7: *the soul that is full will tread upon the honeycomb*. But some are exterior goods, and as to this he says *you have already become rich*, as it seems to you, namely with spiritual riches, of which it is said in Is. c. XXXIII, 6: *the riches of salvation are wisdom and knowledge*. Similar is what is said in Apoc. III, v. 17: *you say, I am rich, and made wealthy, and have need of nothing*. But against this seems what he said above at the beginning, saying that *in all things you have been made rich in him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge*, etc. But it must be said that above he spoke as to the good among them, but here he speaks as to the presumptuous, who were proud about what they did not have. And satiety and riches can be distinguished otherwise, so that satiety is referred to the use of grace, by which one enjoys spiritual things; but riches to the very habits of the graces. Second, when he says *you reign without us*, he mocks them for attributing to themselves alone what they did not have. Hence he says *you reign without us*, that is, thus it seems to you, that the kingdom belongs to you, not to us. For thus they were deceived by the pseudo-apostles, so as to believe that they alone had the truth of the faith, which consists in the kingdom of God, but that the apostle and his followers were in error. Against whom it is said in Is. V, 8: *shall you dwell alone in the midst of the earth?* And lest the apostle should seem to say this out of envy, he adds *would that you did reign*. For he wishes that they might have the true faith, according to that word of Act. XXVI, 29: *I wish that all who hear would become such as I also am, except these bonds*. And so that he might offer them examples of humility, he adds *that we also might reign with you*, as if to say: if you have some excellence, we do not disdain to follow you, as you disdain to follow us, against what is said in Gal. IV, v. 18: *it is good to be zealous in good always*. And it must be noted that the apostle here touches on four species of pride, of which the first is when someone thinks that what he has, he does not have from God, which he touches saying *why do you glory as if you had not received it?* And this can also be reduced to the second species, by which someone thinks he has received by his own merits. The third species is when someone boasts that he has what he does not have, and as to this he says *you are already filled, you have already become rich*. The fourth species is when someone, despising the rest, wishes to be seen singularly, and to this pertains what he says *you reign without us*. Then, when he says *I think that God*, etc., he mocks them for this, that they despised the apostles of Christ, and first he sets down the contempt ironically; second the cause of the contempt, at the words *because we have become a spectacle*. He says therefore first: I said before, that you reign without us, *for I think*, that is, you seem to think, that *God has shown us the apostles as the last*, though it is said below at c. XII, 28 that God has placed in the Church first apostles. For thus is fulfilled what is said in Matth. XX, 16: *the first shall be last, and the last first*. And he gives an example: *as it were destined to death*. For those who are condemned to death are held as the last among men, as being unworthy to live, and such the apostles are considered by worldly men, according to that word of Ps. XLIII, 22: *we are esteemed as sheep for the slaughter*. Then, when he says *because a spectacle*, he assigns the cause of the contempt. Concerning which it must be considered that when some are condemned to death, men are called together to their killing, as it were to a spectacle, and this happened most of all in the case of those who were condemned to the beasts. Because the apostles were as it were destined to death, he adds *because we have become a spectacle to the world*, as if the whole world ran together to watch our killing, according to that word of Ps. XLIII, v. 14: *you have made us a reproach to our neighbors*. He explains, however, what he means by the name "world," when he adds *and to angels, and to men*, namely good and bad. For to their spectacle ran together good angels to strengthen, but bad ones to attack; good men to have compassion and to take an example of patience, bad men to persecute and to mock. Then, when he says *we are fools*, etc., he mocks them in particular, in that they despised the apostles. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets down the contempt; second the cause of the contempt, at the words *even to this hour*, etc. Concerning the first he mocks their contempt as to this, that they attributed excellence to themselves, and deficiency to the apostles. And first as to perfection of intellect. And as to this he says *we are fools for Christ's sake*, that is, we are considered fools, because we preach the cross of Christ, above I, 18: *the word of the cross is foolishness to those who perish*, and also because on account of Christ we endure reproaches and contentions, according to that word of Wis. V, 4: *we fools esteemed their life madness*. Likewise, as is read in Act. c. XXVI, 24, Festus said to Paul: *you are mad, Paul, much learning is turning you to madness*. *You*, according to your own estimation, *are wise in Christ*, because namely you neither dare to confess his cross publicly, nor endure persecution for him. Prov. XXVI, 16: *the sluggard seems wiser to himself than seven men who give answer*. Second, as to power of action, when he says *we are weak*, we are considered so, namely, in exterior things, on account of the afflictions which we endure. II Cor. XII, 9: *I will gladly glory in my infirmities*. *But you*, namely according to your own estimation, *are strong*, namely in bodily things, because you live securely without tribulation. Is. V, 22: *woe to you who are mighty to drink wine, and strong men to mix drunkenness*. *You are noble*, namely, according to your own estimation, that is, worthy of honor, who outwardly suffer no insults. Is. XIX, 11: *I am the son of the wise, the son of ancient kings*. *But we are ignoble*, according to your estimation and that of others, because we are held in contempt. Above I, 27: *the things that are contemptible in the world and ignoble God has chosen*. And yet according to the truth of the matter it is the reverse. For only those are contemptible who despise God, according to that word of I Kings c. II, 30: *but those who despise me shall be ignoble*. Then, when he says *even to this hour*, etc., he assigns the cause of the contempt. And first he sets down as the cause the lack of temporal goods; second the evils which were understood in them, at the words *we are cursed and we bless*; third he concludes his point, at the words *as it were the refuse*. Concerning the first he does two things. First he sets down the lack which they suffered in necessary things. Hence as to what pertains to food, he says *even until this hour*, that is, continuously from our conversion up to the present time, *we hunger and thirst*. II Cor. XI, 27: *in hunger and thirst*. But as to clothing, he adds *and we are naked*, that is, on account of lack of garments, because they were also sometimes stripped. Job XXIV, 7: *men strip the naked, taking away their garments, who have no covering in the cold*. But against this seems what is said in Ps. XXXVI, v. 25: *I have not seen the just forsaken, nor his seed seeking bread*. But it must be said that the apostles suffered in such a way that they were not forsaken, because divine providence moderated in them both abundance and want, as much as was expedient for them for the exercise of virtue. Hence also the apostle, Phil. IV, 11 ff.: *everywhere and in all things I have been instructed, both to be full, and to be hungry; both to abound, and to suffer need; I can do all things in him who strengthens me*. Second, he sets down their lack of those things which pertain to the well-being of human life, the first of which is reverence shown by men, against which he says *and we are buffeted*, which indeed happens more for reproach than for punishment. Hence of Christ we read in Matth. XXVI, 67, that *they spat in his face, and buffeted him*. Second, rest in a place is required, against which it is said *and we are unsettled*, both because they were driven by persecutors from place to place, according to that word of Matth. X, 23: *if they persecute you in one city, flee into another*, and also because for the carrying out of their office they ran about everywhere, according to that word of Io. c. XV, 16: *I have appointed you that you should go*. Third, the help of those ministering is required, against which it is said *and we labor, working with our own hands*, both because sometimes no one gave them means of sustenance; and also because by the labor of their hands they acquired their living, either to avoid burdening the faithful, or to repel the pseudo-apostles, who preached for gain, as is found in II Cor. XII, 16 ff.; and also, so as to give the idle an example of laboring, as is found in II Thess. III, 9. Hence Paul says, Act. XX, v. 34: *these hands have ministered to my necessities, and to those who are with me*. Then, when he says *we are cursed*, etc., he sets down the evils which the apostles suffered. And first in words, when he says *we are cursed*, that is, men speak evil of us, either to detract, or to inflict insults, or even by imprecating evils. Jer. XV, v. 10: *all curse me*. *And we bless*, that is, we render good for evil, according to that word of I Pet. III, 9: *not rendering evil for evil, but contrariwise blessing*. Second, in deeds, and as to this he says *we suffer persecution*, not only as to this, that we are driven from place to place, which is properly called persecution, but as to this, that we are troubled in many ways, according to that word of Ps. CXVIII, 157: *many are they who persecute me and afflict me*. *And we endure*, namely all things patiently in Christ. Eccli. I, 29: *even to a time the patient will endure*. Third, he touches the cause of both, when he says *we are blasphemed*, that is, blasphemies are imposed upon us, since we are called magicians or evildoers, and are reputed enemies of God, according to that word of Io. c. XVI, 2: *the hour comes, that whoever kills you will think he does a service to God*; and Rom. III, 8: *as we are blasphemed, and as some affirm that we say, let us do evil, that good may come*. Yet, *we beseech God for those who persecute and blaspheme us*, according to that word of Matth. V, 44: *pray for those who persecute and calumniate you*. Then, when he says *as it were the refuse*, etc., he concludes from all that has been said their contempt, saying: and on account of all that has been said we have become *as it were the refuse of this world*, that is, we are reputed both by Jews and by Gentiles, as those by whom the world is defiled: and that by our killing the world may be purged, and *as it were we are the offscouring of all*. That is called offscouring which is any refuse, whether of fruit, or of iron, or of any other thing. And this *even until now*, because indeed we continually suffer this. But at some time it will cease, according to that word of Wis. V, 3, where it is said from the mouth of the wicked: *these are they whom we once held in derision, and as a byword of reproach*. And afterward it is added: *how then are they numbered among the sons of God?*”

“And these things , brethren , I have in a figure transferred to myself &c. “ Above that which is written ” may refer (1.) to ch. i. 2, 3; or (2.) with S. Chrysostom it may mean “contrary to that which is written ” in Holy Scripture against pride. It is foolish, therefore, for the Protestants to abuse this passage into an argument against tradition. S. Paul evidently means that what he had said against their idle boasting of the gifts of their teachers, and about not caring for the applause and opinion of men, but only for God’s, had been said of them in the person of himself and Apollos. He had been speaking of others in his own name, so as to avoid offending any of the Corinthian teachers, or their disciples, by mentioning their names. That ye might leant in us, therefore, is the expression of his desire, that when he speaks of himself or Apollos, they may apply what he said to the other teachers, who had been the occasion of the schism, of which he and Apollos were guiltless. He urges the Corinthians by his own example of moderation and conciliatory disposition not to be puffed up, or boast of one against another, viz., for this or that catechist or teacher, by saying, “ I was baptized by Paul; I was converted by Apollos.” It is, too, an exhortation to the teachers not to be proud and puffed up because they might be THE SPIRIT OF FACTION 77 wiser or more eloquent than other teachers, or boast of their disciples as being better instructed than those of other teachers, above that which he had just now written. Do not boast of your own teaching, nor give occasion of boasting to your disciples, is the gist of this verse. For in what follows he is reproving the teachers rather than disciples ; but he does it in a mild way and under another name, the teachers, I mean, who had been the chief cause of the empty contention and divisions among his Corinthian disciples. This will be seen by reference to ch. v. 15, 18, 19, and also ch. iii. 10, as well as to the whole of ch. xi. of the Second Epistle. For the false teachers whom he here speaks of mildly, because they had not yet disclosed their true nature, are the same apparently as those that in 2 Cor. xi. he speaks more severely of as impostors, and guilty of Judaising, and teaching false doctrine. Hence, as Chrysostom, Theophylact, and (Ecumenius point out, S. Paul first censures the teachers in the words, “ that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written,” i.e., that you, teachers, might learn from me and Apollos that you are, as I, said before, merely stewards of God. Then he proceeds to rebuke the disciples in the words, “that no one of you be puffed up for one against another,” £*., that no disciple boast of his teacher as wiser or more eloquent than another. S. Paul, then, while he seems to continue his address to the Corinthians, is in them and through them reproving their teachers. Just so a tutor endowed with tact and judgment will, when he wishes to chide a king’s sons, chide their servants, as if they were guilty, that so the princes may take it to themselves. The expression " puffed up, ” to describe one that is proud and swollen with arrogance, is a figure borrowed from wine skins. They are said to be puffed out when by being filled with air they resemble in form and size a solid body. Similarly, the proud man who is well satisfied with his knowledge, or eloquence, or some such gift, but within is devoid of all such powers, is just like a wine-skin that is swollen out with wind. Digitized by v^,ooQle 78 FIRST EPISTLE TO THE”

“And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred,.... Not what he had said concerning the different factions at Corinth, one being for Paul, and another for Apollos, and another for Cephas, as if these several parties did not really go by those names, but by those of others, the false teachers; only the apostle, to decline everything that looked like reflection, put these, as the Syriac version renders it, "upon" his own "person", and Apollos's, the sooner and better to put an end to such divisions; for it is certain, from his way of arguing and reasoning, that these are not fictitious names, but they were really divided, and were quarrelling among themselves about himself, Apollos, and Cephas: but his meaning is, when he says, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos these things; that he had "brought these comparisons", as the Arabic version reads it, concerning himself and Apollos; namely, that one was a planter, and another a waterer; that they were both labourers and builders, ministers or servants, and stewards: and these similes, and such a figurative way of speaking he had made use of, as he says, for your sakes; for the sake of the members of this church, that they might have right notions of them, and accordingly account of them, and behave towards them: or, as he adds, that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written: meaning, either in the word of God in general; or in some particular passages of Scripture he might have respect to; or rather in the above places in this, and the foregoing chapter, where he gives the fore mentioned characters of ministers; where, in the apostles themselves, in their own words, from their own account, they might learn, on the one hand, not to ascribe too much to them, nor, on the other hand, to detract from their just character and usefulness: and also, that no one of you be puffed up for one against the other; speak great swelling words of vanity, and envy, for one minister against another; when they are all one, bear the same character, are in the same office, and are jointly concerned in the same common cause of Christ and the good of immortal souls.”

“These things - Which I have written, Co1 3:5, etc. I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos - I have written as if myself and Apollos were the authors of the sects which now prevail among you; although others, without either our consent or knowledge, have proclaimed us heads of parties. Bishop Pearce paraphrases the verse thus: "I have made use of my own and Apollos' name in my arguments against your divisions, because I would spare to name those teachers among you who are guilty of making and heading parties; and because I would have you, by our example, not to value them above what I have said of teachers in general in this epistle; so that none of you ought to be puffed up for one against another." Doubtless there were persons at Corinth who, taking advantage of this spirit of innovation among that people, set themselves up also for teachers, and endeavored to draw disciples after them. And perhaps some even of these were more valued by the fickle multitude than the very apostles by whom they had been brought out of heathenish darkness into the marvellous light of the Gospel. I have already supposed it possible that Diotrephes was one of the ringleaders in these schisms at Corinth. See on Co1 1:14 (note).”

“These things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself, and to Apollo. Literally, these things have I transfigured in me and Apollo, that is, I have represented the divisions and disputes among you, as if it were by your contending, whether I, or Apollo, or Cephas were the best preachers, without naming those, as I might do, who are the true causes of these divisions, by striving who should be thought men of the greatest and brightest parts. — That in us, and by our example, who have no such proud disputes, you might learn that one be not puffed up against the other, and above that which is written, against the admonitions given in the holy Scriptures of being humble: or against what I have now written to you, that we must strive for nothing, but to be the faithful ministers of God, and not seek the esteem of men. (Witham) — It is the opinion of St. Thomas Aquinas and likewise of Estius, that St. Paul, Apollo, and Cephas were not the real causes of the divisions that existed amongst the new converts at Corinth, but that in making use of these names, he wished to teach them, that if it was unlawful to keep up these divisions even for the sake of the apostles, how far should they be from doing any thing of this kind for those whose authority was much less in the Church. But Calmet is of opinion, that the divisions amongst the Corinthians were certainly on account of Paul, Apollo, Cephas, and perhaps some others, whose names are not mentioned.”

“And--"Now," marking transition. in a figure transferred to myself--that is, I have represented under the persons of Apollos and myself what really holds good of all teachers, making us two a figure or type of all the others. I have mentioned us two, whose names have been used as a party cry; but under our names I mean others to be understood, whom I do not name, in order not to shame you [ESTIUS]. not to think, &c.--The best manuscripts omit "think." Translate, "That in us (as your example) ye might learn (this), not (to go) beyond what is written." Revere the silence of Holy Writ, as much as its declarations: so you will less dogmatize on what is not expressly revealed (Deu 29:29). puffed up for one--namely, "for one (favorite minister) against another." The Greek indicative implies, "That ye be not puffed up as ye are."”