The interpretation timeline

1Cor 7:27

How this passage has been read — the sources, oldest to newest.

From the early Church Fathers to now.

4 Patristic · 2 Reformed · 1 Methodist

1Cor 7:27 · Douay-Rheims
“Art thou bound to a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife.”
Patristic before A.D. 750
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“For the apostle, although preferring the grace of continence, yet permits the contraction of marriage and the enjoyment of it, and advises the continuance therein rather than the dissolution there of. Christ plainly forbids divorce, Moses unquestionably permits it.”
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“Why should you restore what God has put an end to? Why do you, by repeating the servitude of matrimony, spurn the liberty which is offered you? "You have been bound to a wife," sap the apostle; "seek not loosing.”
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“However, touching second marriage, we know plainly that the apostle has pronounced: "Thou t been loosed from a wife; seek not a wife. But if thou shalt marry, thou wilt not sin." Still, as in the former case, he has introduced the order of this discourse too from his personal suggestion, not from a divine precept.”
187 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"Art thou bound unto a wife? Seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? Seek not a wife." These words carry no contradiction to what had been said before but rather the most entire agreement with them. For he says in that place also, "Except it be by consent:" as here he says, "Art thou bound unto a wife? Seek not separation." This is no contradiction. For its being against consent makes a dissolution: but if with consent both live continently, it is no dissolution.”
Source
1,364 years pass — nothing from this stretch is hosted yet
Post-Reformation c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Art thou bound unto a wife?.... Or to a woman; either by promise, or by espousal, or by consummate marriage; either of which is a tic, or obligation, a bond, and especially the latter; marriage is such a bond as cannot be dissolved, but by the death of one of the parties; see Rom 7:2 unless in case of adultery, or of wilful desertion: and it is a bond which mutually obliges; as the husband is bound by the law of marriage to live chastely and lovingly with his wife, and to take care of her, and provide for her; so the wife is bound by the same law to live in like manner with her husband, and to submit unto him, and obey him: seek not to be loosed; do not depart from her, nor seek to be divorced, nor even desire to be loosed by death: art thou loosed from a wife? being either never married, or else if having been married the wife is dead, or legally divorced for a just cause: seek not a wife, or woman; make no inquiry after one; be content to live without one; enter not into a marriage state, nor take any step towards it; it is best to continue loosed, for the reason above given, that is, provided the person has the gift of continence, otherwise not; see Co1 7:5.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Art thou bound unto a wife? - i.e. Married; for the marriage contract was considered in the light of a bond. Seek not to be loosed - Neither regret your circumstances, notwithstanding the present distress, nor seek on this account for a dissolution of the marriage contract. But if thou art under no matrimonial engagements, do not for the present enter into any.”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“Illustrating the meaning of "so to be," Co1 7:26. Neither the married (those "bound to a wife") nor the unmarried (those "loosed from a wife") are to "seek" a change of state (compare Co1 7:20, Co1 7:24).”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.