A.D. 220 – 1871 10 witnesses 14 excerpts
“For this (rule), even in his own person, the apostle has laid down. For, when affirming that Christ came for this end, that He might save sinners, of whom himself had been the "first," what does he add? "And I obtained mercy, because I did (so) ignorantly in unbelief.”
“What the apostles received, they passed on without change, so that the doctrine of the mysteries (the sacraments) and Christ would remain correct. The divine Word—the Son of God—wants us to be their (the apostles') disciples. It is appropriate for them to be our teachers, and it is necessary for us to submit to their teaching alone. Only from them and from those who have faithfully taught their doctrine do we get, as Paul writes, "faithful words, worthy of complete acceptance." With them we are back to ground level, because they did not become disciples as a result of what they heard from others. Rather, they were eyewitnesses and servants of God the Word, and they handed down what they heard directly from him.”
“It is no humility to think that you are a sinner when you really are a sinner. But whenever one is conscious of having done many great deeds but does not imagine that he is something great in himself, that is true humility. When a man is like Paul and can say, "I have nothing on my conscience," and then can add, "But I am not justified by this," and can say again, "Christ Jesus came to save sinners of whom I am the chief," that is true humility. That man is truly humble who does exalted deeds but, in his own mind, sees himself as lowly.”
“The favors of God so far exceed human hope and expectation, that often they are not believed. For God has bestowed upon us such things as the mind of man never looked for, never thought of. It is for this reason that the Apostles spend much discourse in securing a belief of the gifts that are granted us of God. For as men, upon receiving some great good, ask themselves if it is not a dream, as not believing it; so it is with respect to the gifts of God. What then was it that was thought incredible? That those who were enemies, and sinners, neither justified by the law, nor by works, should immediately through faith alone be advanced to the highest favor. Upon this head accordingly Paul has discoursed at length in his Epistle to the Romans, and here again at length. "This is a faithful saying," he says, "and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners." As the Jews were chiefly attracted by this, he persuades them not to give heed to the law, since they could not attain salvation by it without faith. Against this he contends; for it seemed to them incredible, that a man who had mis-spent all his former life in vain and wicked actions, should afterwards be saved by his faith alone. On this account he says, "It is a saying to be believed." "This is a faithful saying," he says. But why is it to be believed? This appears both from what precedes and from what follows. Observe how he prepares us for this assertion, and how he then dwells upon it. For he hath previously declared that He showed mercy to me "a blasphemer and a persecutor"; this was in the way of preparation. And not only did He show mercy, but "He accounted me faithful." So far should we be he means, from disbelieving that He showed mercy. For no one, who should see a prisoner admitted into a palace, could doubt whether he obtained mercy. And this was visibly the situation of Paul, for he makes himself the example. Nor is he ashamed to call himself a sinner, but rather delights in it, as he thus can best demonstrate the miracle of God's regard for him, and that He had thought him worthy of such extraordinary kindness. But how is it, that he here calls himself a sinner, nay, the chief of sinners, whereas he elsewhere asserts that he was "touching the righteousness which is in the law blameless"? Because with respect to the righteousness which God has wrought, the justification which is really sought, even those who are righteous in the law are sinners, "for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." Therefore he does not say righteousness simply, but "the righteousness which is in the law." As a man that has acquired wealth, with respect to himself appears rich, but upon a comparison with the treasures of kings is very poor and the chief of the poor; so it is in this case. Compared with Angels, even righteous men are sinners; and if Paul, who wrought the righteousness that is in the law, was the chief of sinners, what other man can be called righteous? For he says not this to condemn his own life as impure, let not this be imagined; but comparing his own legal righteousness with the righteousness of God, he shows it to be nothing worth, and not only so, but he proves those who possess it to be sinners.”
“We heard the blessed apostle Paul saying, "The word is human and worthy of total acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost." So it's a human word, and worthy of total acceptance. Why human, and not divine? Without the slightest doubt, unless this word were also divine, it would not be worthy of total acceptance. But this word is both human and divine in the same sort of way that Christ himself is both man and God. So if we are right in understanding this word to be not only human but also divine, why did the apostle prefer to call it human rather than divine?… So the aspect he chose was the one by which Christ came into the world. He came, after all, insofar as he was man. Because insofar as he was God, he was always there.”
“There was no reason for Christ the Lord to come, except to save sinners. Eliminate diseases, eliminate wounds, and there is no call for medicine. If a great doctor has come down from heaven, a great invalid must have been lying very sick throughout the whole wide world. This invalid is the whole human race.”
“"For all have sinned," either in Adam or by themselves, "and are deprived of the glory of God." Consequently, the whole human mass ought to be punished, and if the deserved punishment of damnation were rendered to all, beyond all doubt it would be justly rendered. This is why those who are liberated from it by grace are not called vessels of their own merits but "vessels of mercy." But whose mercy was it but him who sent Jesus Christ into this world to save sinners, whom he foreknew, predestined, called, justified and glorified? Hence, who could be so advanced in foolish insanity as not to render ineffable thanks to the mercy of this God who liberates those whom he has wished, considering that one could not in any way reproach the justice of God in condemning all entirely?”
“Pay attention to the apostle Paul, "The word is faithful and worthy of total acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first." He said, "of whom I am the first." How was he the first? Weren't there so many Jews who were sinners before him? Weren't there any sinners before him in the whole human race?… So what's the meaning of "of whom I am the first"? That I am worse than all of them. By first he meant us to understand worst.… Remember Saul, and you'll discover why. Isn't he the one who wasn't satisfied with only one hand to stone Stephen, and who took care of the coats of the others? Isn't he the one who persecuted the church everywhere?… So he it is who was the number one persecutor. There was none worse than he.”
“What was foreknown about the malice of Jews and what was properly decreed regarding the passion of Christ were very different and quite contrary. For the will to murder did not proceed from the same place as the will to die. Nor did their heinous crime and the Redeemer's patience arise from a single spirit. Our Lord did not himself cause the wicked hands of his attackers to be laid on him, but he permitted this. He did not force what was going to happen actually to happen simply by foreknowing it. Yet it was for this purpose that he had taken on flesh, so that it might happen. Finally, so disparate were the motives of the Crucified and of those crucifying, that what was undertaken by Christ could not be abolished, what was committed by those others could indeed have been put to a halt. He who came "to save sinners" did not deny his mercy even to his own murderers, but turned the evil of godless people to the good of believers.”
“Above he showed his own condition, both as to sins under the law and as to the goods in the time of grace; here he shows the reason for these benefits, which is taken from divine mercy. And first he sets forth divine mercy in general; second he applies it to himself, at the words "of whom I am the first"; third he sets forth the giving of thanks, at the words "but to the king of ages." Concerning the first he does two things: first he commends the truth about to be proposed; second he sets forth the divine mercy, at the words "because Christ Jesus." As to the first he says, "a faithful saying," etc. Now there are two things to be commended in a saying, namely that it be true and that it be acceptable. For sometimes a true saying is harsh, and stirs up hatred. Gal. 4:16: "I have become your enemy, telling you the truth." But this saying, first indeed, has truth; hence he says, "a faithful saying." Apoc., last chapter: "these words are most faithful and true." Likewise it is acceptable, because it concerns our salvation; therefore he says, "and worthy of all acceptance." Zach. 1:13: "and the Lord answered the angel who was speaking," etc. Another text has: "a human saying," because it concerns the taking up of men. Titus 3:4: "the kindness and love for mankind of our Savior appeared," etc. And this saying is such: "that Christ came," etc. That he came into the world expresses a twofold nature, namely that of divinity, in which he existed before he appeared in the world. John 16:28: "I came forth from the Father, and came into the world," etc. And that of humanity, in which he appeared. And because he is God, he fills heaven and earth, Jer. 23:24; therefore it does not belong to him according to the divine nature to be in any place, but it belongs to him according to the human nature. John 1:10: "he was in the world, and the world," et cetera. "He came unto his own," et cetera. But for what did he come? "To save sinners," that is, for the salvation of the peoples. John 3:17: "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him." John 12:47: "For I did not come to judge the world." But if no one had been a sinner, would he not have been incarnate? It seems not, because he came to save sinners. Therefore the incarnation would not have been necessary. Likewise the Gloss: "take away the disease, and there will be no need of medicine." I answer. It must be said that this is sufficiently clear from the words of the saints. But this question is not of great authority, because God ordained the things to be done according as the things to be done actually were. And we do not know what he would have ordained, if he had not foreseen sin; nevertheless the authorities seem expressly to declare that he would not have been incarnate, if man had not sinned — toward which side I myself incline more. Then when he says "of whom I am the first," he applies this to himself. First confessing himself a sinner; second he says that he was saved, at the words "but I obtained mercy." He says therefore, "of whom I am the first." Here a certain heretic says that the soul of Adam was in Paul, and passed from body to body — as if to say: I am the first sinner, because the soul of Adam is my soul. But this is against the Apostle, Rom. 9:11: "when they were not yet born," etc. Therefore the soul does not exist before the body. He is first, therefore, not in time but in the greatness of his sins. And he says this out of humility. Prov. 18:17: "the just man is first the accuser of himself." Prov. 30:2: "I am the most foolish of men," etc. But was the Apostle really the greatest sinner? And it seems that Judas was greater. But some say that Paul's sin was more general, because it was against the whole Church. But this is nothing, since Paul acted in unbelief, whereas many Jews persecuted out of malice. It must be said, therefore, that he is first, not because he was the greatest among the sinners who then existed, but the greatest among sinners who were saved; as if to say: he came to save sinners, of whom — namely, of the sinners saved — I am the first; which is to be understood of those who preceded the Apostle, since even before him many others had persecuted the Church. And he says this in order to show that everything God does, he does for the showing forth of his own goodness. Prov. 16:4: "the Lord has worked all things for himself." Ecclesiasticus: "his work is full of the glory of the Lord." Likewise for our benefit; and therefore he says, "therefore he saved me." First for his own glory. Hence "first" is expounded as first in time, or as first, that is, most especially. "All patience," that is, perfect patience, because though provoked he did not punish, but rather exalted his adversary, and this for our benefit; hence he says "for an example," that is, for instruction and edification — as if to say: so that sinners might not despair of approaching him. 1 Peter, last chapter: "made a pattern of the flock." Then when he says "to the king," etc., he sets forth the giving of thanks, and concerning this he does two things: first he commends him to whom thanks are given; second he renders thanks, at the word "honor." Now he commends him, first, from his power; second, from the property of his nature. As to the first he says, "to the king." His dominion is the greatest, because he alone rules, and has free power, not according to statutes, as a political ruler does. But God alone is the lord of all. And therefore he says, "to God." Apoc. 19:16: "king of kings and lord of lords." Ps. 46:7: "for God is king of all the earth." Likewise the power of any king, for the most part, lasts no more than fifty years, but this one is of all ages. Ps. 144:13: "your kingdom is of all ages," etc. Ecclesiasticus 10:4: "the power of the earth is in the hand of God." To whom also belongs the property of the nature of God. Concerning this it must be known that among things, the first difference of natural things is the corruptible and the incorruptible. And of incorruptible things, some are visible and corporeal, such as the terrestrial bodies; but some are invisible and spiritual, such as the angels. And these, according to the Platonists, are divided into gods, who are supreme by nature, and into intellects, which are not gods but are divine, and into souls; but among us there is one God alone. Deut. 6:4: "hear, O Israel, the Lord your God." He says therefore, first, "immortal," to distinguish him from corruptible things; "invisible," to show that he belongs to the invisible, and to distinguish him from other visible things. He says "to God alone," and not "alone immortal," or "alone invisible," because he alone is God by nature, although he could be called "alone immortal," and "alone invisible," that is, special above the others. Below, last chapter: "who alone has immortality." Then when he says "honor and glory," he gives thanks; as if to say: honor is to be shown to him from the subjection of the whole creature, and in manifestation of his own most excellent goodness, brightness, and glory. Apoc. 7:12: "blessing, and brightness, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, honor, power and strength to our God." "Forever and ever," because the age of others lasts but a little time. Is. 40:6: "all flesh is grass, and all its glory as the flower of the grass." Then when he says "this commandment," etc., he instructs Timothy to remain in the things that are said. First he recalls what has been entrusted to him; second he admonishes him to the due use of it; and third he teaches the manner of using it. He says therefore, "this commandment" — namely, that you keep the end of the law, that is, that you preserve charity always, and not the fables of the Jews — "I commend to you," as a faithful deposit, because it has been entrusted to you for this reason. And how? "According to the preceding," etc., that is, because this Gospel does not disagree with the prophecies which he had learned before, since he was the son of a Jewish woman. 2 Peter 1:19: "we have a more sure prophetic word, to which you do well to attend, as to a lamp shining in a dark place," etc. 1 Thess., last chapter: "do not despise prophecies," etc. Or "according to the preceding," that is, according to what I and other holy men knew through the spirit of prophecy was to be handed on to you concerning you. "That in them you may war," namely in those prophecies, "the good warfare." Warfare is twofold: one spiritual, one carnal. 2 Cor. 10:4: "the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty to God," etc. In a good warfare two things are required on the part of the soldier: namely, that he do nothing contrary to military discipline, and that he not grow slack through idleness. 1 Cor. 9:25: "everyone who competes in the contest abstains from all things," etc. Likewise on the part of the warfare two things are required: namely, that it fight down those opposed to the commonwealth, and that it subject those who ought to be subject. So too it is in the spiritual warfare, because it is ordered to destroying all who exalt themselves, and to subjecting every understanding to the obedience of Christ, as is said in 2 Cor. 10. And this is the true warfare, of which he says "that you war," etc. Where also, first, the manner of using it is set forth, and second its necessity, at the words "which some." He says therefore, "that you war," etc., as if to say: you can indeed wage the good warfare, first through the good faith which you have. 1 John, last chapter: "this is the victory that overcomes the world, faith," etc. Likewise through a good conscience, because a man easily withdraws from that which bites him; hence the remorse of conscience is like a certain goad, which pricks the one who has a bad conscience, and therefore he quickly withdraws from sins through a good conscience and right faith. Acts 23:1: "I have lived before God in all good conscience until this day." 2 Cor. 1:12: "this is our glory, the testimony of our conscience." The necessity of a good conscience is consequently shown, when he says "which some," etc.; where first he sets forth the fault; second the punishment; third the fruit of the punishment. The fault, at the word "which" — namely, a good conscience — "certain men, thrusting away, have made shipwreck concerning the faith." For he who errs against the faith loses everything that he has. Heb. 11:6: "without faith it is impossible to please God." Likewise he dies, because "my just man lives by faith," Habakkuk 2:4, and Rom. 11:17 — "of whom are Alexander and Hymenaeus." 2 Tim. 4:14: "Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm," etc. Then their punishment is set forth, when he says "whom I have delivered," etc., because he excommunicated them, so that the faithful might avoid them, lest they defile them. Now the excommunication of the Apostle was of such power that those excommunicated were soon seized upon by the Devil, and vexed bodily. 1 Cor. 5:4f.: "you being gathered together, and my spirit, in the power of the Lord Jesus, to deliver such a man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved." Yet even now men are delivered up to be vexed spiritually, because they lose the suffrages of the Church, which help much against the Devil. And "I have delivered" just as God "delivered up to a reprobate sense," Rom. 1:28, as it were withdrawing his help, and the communion of the Church, and its suffrages. And this not out of hatred, but out of charity for their profit. 1 Cor. 5:5: "that the spirit may be saved." Hence he says, "that they may learn," at least through punishment, "not to blaspheme." Now one learns to withdraw from sin in three ways: sometimes, namely, through punishment, when he is vexed bodily; likewise through the confusion of excommunication; likewise from this, that when the Church delivers someone to Satan, he falls into manifest sins, whence, confounded, he is humbled, and abstains even from the hidden sins, which before he did not know himself to have.”
“This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation,.... This is said, lest it should be thought strange, or scarcely credible, that so great a sinner should be saved; as well as to give a summary of the glorious Gospel the apostle was intrusted with; and in opposition to fables, endless genealogies, and vain jangling, and contentions about the law. The doctrine of Christ's coming into the world, and of salvation by him, as it is the sum and substance of the Gospel, so it is a "faithful saying"; in which the faithfulness of God is displayed to himself, and the perfections of his nature, his holiness, justice, love, grace, and mercy; to his law, which is magnified, and made honourable; to his word of promise hereby fulfilled; and to his Son in carrying him through the work: and the faithfulness of Christ is discovered herein, both to his Father with whom, and to his friends for whom, he engaged to obtain salvation; and the faithfulness of ministers is shown in preaching it, and of other saints in professing it, and abiding by it: it is a true saying, and not to be disputed or doubted of, but to be believed most firmly; it is certain that God the Father sent his Son into the world for this purpose; and Christ himself assures us, that he came for this end; his carriage to sinners, and his actions, testified the same; his works and miracles confirm it; and the numberless instances of sinners saved by him evince the truth of it: and it is "worthy of all acceptation"; or to be received by all sorts of persons, learned, or unlearned, rich or poor, greater or lesser sinners; and to be received in all ways, and in the best manner, as the word of God, and not man; with heartiness and readiness, and with love, joy, and gladness, and with meekness, faith, and fear, and by all means; for it is entirely true, absolutely necessary, and suitable to the case of all, and is to be highly valued and esteemed by those who do approve and accept of it. It is the Christian Cabala, or the evangelical tradition, delivered by the Father to Christ, by him to his apostles, and by them to the saints, by whom it is cordially received. The apostle seems to allude to the Cabala of the Jews, their oral law, which they say (m) was delivered to Moses on Mount Sinai, and by him to Joshua; and by Joshua to the elders; and by the elders to the prophets; and so from one to another to his times: but here he suggests, that if they would have a Cabala, here is one, that is firm, and true, and certain, and worthy to be received, whereas the Jewish one was precarious, yea, false and untrue. Indeed, sometimes the words of the prophets are so called by them; so that passage in Joe 2:13 is called "Cabala" (n), some thing delivered and received; upon which one of their commentators (o) has these words, "whatever a prophet commands the Israelites, makes known unto them, or exhorts them to, is a Cabala. And if a prophetic command or admonition, then surely: such an evangelical doctrine, as follows, is entitled to this character, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; Christ came into the world, being sent by his Father, but not against his will, but with his free consent: he came voluntarily in the fulness of time into this sinful world, where he was ill treated; and this was not by local motion, or change of place, but by assumption of nature; and the end of it was, that he might be the Saviour of lost sinners, as all men are, both by Adam's sin, and their own transgressions; though he came not to save all, for then all would be saved, whereas they are not; and if he came to save them, he must have then so far lost his end; but he came to save sinners, of all sorts, even notorious sinners, the worst and chief of sinners: and the apostle instances in himself, of whom I am chief; or "first"; not that he was the first in time; Adam was the first man that sinned, though Eve was before him in the transgression: it is a most stupid notion, that some gave into from this passage, as if the soul of Adam passed from one body to another, till it came to Paul, and therefore he calls himself the first of sinners: but his meaning is, that he was the first in quality, or the greatest and chiefest of sinners, not only of those that are saved, but of all men, Jews or Gentiles; and this he said not hyperbolically, nor out of modesty, but from a real sense or apprehension he had of himself, and his sins, which were made exceeding sinful to him; or he was the chief of sinners, and exceeded all others in his way of sinning, in blaspheming the name of Christ, and persecuting his saints, otherwise his conversation was externally moral, and in his own, and in the opinion of others, blameless: he was no fornicator, adulterer, thief, extortioner, &c. but in the above things he went beyond all others, and was a ringleader in them; and the remembrance of these sins abode with him, and kept him humble all his days; he was always ready to acknowledge them, and express his vileness and unworthiness on account of them: hence he here says, not "of whom I was", but "of whom I am chief". Now such sinners, and all sorts of sinners, Christ came to save from all their sins, original and actual; from the law, its curse and condemnation; from the bondage of Satan, the evil of the world, and wrath to come, and from every enemy; and that, by his obedience, sufferings, and death, by fulfilling the law, bearing its penalty, offering himself a sacrifice for sin, thereby finishing it, making reconciliation for it, and bringing in an everlasting righteousness: and a great Saviour he is, and an only one; a full, suitable, able, and willing Saviour; a Saviour of the soul, as well as of the body, and of both with an everlasting salvation, (m) Pirke Abot, c. 1. sect. 1. (n) Misn. Taanith, c. 2. sect. 1. (o) Jarchi Misn. Taanith, c. 2. sect. 1.”
“Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners - This is one of the most glorious truths in the book of God; the most important that ever reached the human ear, or can be entertained by the heart of man. All men are sinners; and as such condemned, justly condemned, to eternal death. Christ Jesus became incarnate, suffered, and died to redeem them; and, by his grace and Spirit, saves them from their sins. This saying or doctrine he calls, first, a faithful or true saying; πιστος ὁ λογος, it is a doctrine that may be credited, without the slightest doubt or hesitation; God himself has spoken it; and the death of Christ and the mission of the Holy Ghost, sealing pardon on the souls of all who believe, have confirmed and established the truth. Secondly, it is worthy of all acceptation; as all need it, it is worthy of being received by all. It is designed for the whole human race, for all that are sinners is applicable to all, because all are sinners; and may be received by all, being put within every man's reach, and brought to every man's ear and bosom, either by the letter of the word, or, where that revelation is not yet come, by the power of the Divine Spirit, the true light from Christ that lightens every man that cometh into the world. From this also it is evident that the death of Christ, and all its eternally saving effects, were designed for every man. Of whom I am chief - Ὡν πρωτος ειμι εγω. Confounding Paul the apostle, in the fullness of his faith and love, with Saul of Tarsus, in his ignorance, unbelief, and persecuting rage, we are in the habit of saying: "This is a hyperbolical expression, arguing the height of the apostle's modesty and humility and must not be taken according to the letter." I see it not in this light; I take it not with abatement; it is strictly and literally true: take the whole of the apostle's conduct, previously to his conversion, into consideration, and was there a greater sinner converted to God from the incarnation to his own time? Not one; he was the chief; and, keeping his blasphemy, persecution, and contumely in view, he asserts: Of all that the Lord Jesus came into the world to save, and of all that he had saved to that time, I am chief. And who, however humble now, and however flagitious before, could have contested the points with him? He was what he has said, and as he has said it. And it is very probable that the apostle refers to those in whom the grace and mercy of God were, at the first promulgation of the Gospel, manifested: and comparing himself with all these he could with propriety say, ὡν πρωτος ειμι, of whom I am the first; the first who, from a blasphemer, persecutor (and might we not add murderer? see the part he took in the martyrdom of Stephen), became a preacher of that Gospel which I had persecuted. And hence, keeping this idea strictly in view, he immediately adds: Howbeit, for this cause I obtained mercy; that in me First, πρωτῳ, Jesus Christ might show forth all longsuffering, for a pattern To Them which should Hereafter, των μελλοντων believe on him to life everlasting. And this great display of the pardoning mercy of God, granted in so singular a manner, at the very first promulgation of the Gospel, was most proper to be produced as a pattern for the encouragement of all penitent sinners to the end of time. If Jesus Christ, with whom there can be no respect of persons, saved Saul of Tarsus, no sinner need despair.”
“Christ Jesus, the true son of God, came into the world to save sinners, of whom (says St. Paul) I am the chief, the first, the greatest. (Witham)”
“faithful--worthy of credit, because "God" who says it "is faithful" to His word (Co1 1:9; Th1 5:24; Th2 3:3; Rev 21:5; Rev 22:6). This seems to have become an axiomatic saying among Christians the phrase, "faithful saying," is peculiar to the Pastoral Epistles (Ti1 2:11; Ti1 4:9; Tit 3:8). Translate as Greek, "Faithful is the saying." all--all possible; full; to be received by all, and with all the faculties of the soul, mind, and heart. Paul, unlike the false teachers (Ti1 1:7), understands what he is saying, and whereof he affirms; and by his simplicity of style and subject, setting forth the grand fundamental truth of salvation through Christ, confutes the false teachers' abstruse and unpractical speculations (Co1 1:18-28; Tit 2:1). acceptation--reception (as of a boon) into the heart, as well as the understanding, with all gladness; this is faith acting on the Gospel offer, and welcoming and appropriating it (Act 2:41). Christ--as promised. Jesus--as manifested [BENGEL]. came into the world--which was full of sin (Joh 1:29; Rom 5:12; Jo1 2:2). This implies His pre-existence. Joh 1:9, Greek, "the true Light that, coming into the world, lighteth every man." to save sinners--even notable sinners like Saul of Tarsus. His instance was without a rival since the ascension, in point of the greatness of the sin and the greatness of the mercy: that the consenter to Stephen, the proto-martyr's death, should be the successor of the same! I am--not merely, "I was chief" (Co1 15:9; Eph 3:8; compare Luk 18:13). To each believer his own sins must always appear, as long as he lives, greater than those of others, which he never can know as he can know his own. chief--the same Greek as in Ti1 1:16, "first," which alludes to this fifteenth verse, Translate in both verses, "foremost." Well might he infer where there was mercy for him, there is mercy for all who will come to Christ (Mat 18:11; Luk 19:10).”
The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.