And let these also first be proved: and so let them minister, having no crime.

“And here he requires, though in other words, that he be "not a novice," where he says, "Let these also first be proved," where the conjunction "also" is added, as connecting this with what had been said before of Bishops, for nothing intervenes between. And there is the same reason for the "not a novice" in that case. For would it not be absurd, that when a newly purchased slave is not entrusted with anything in a house, till he has by long trial given proofs of his character, yet that one should enter into the Church of God from a state of heathenism, and be at once placed in a station of preeminence?”

“None could rightly be ordained a minister in the church if the apostle had said, "If any is without sin," where he says, "If any is without crime"; or if he had said, "Having no sin," where he says, "Having no crime." Because many baptized believers are without crime, but I should say that no one in this life is without sin—however much the Pelagians are inflated, and burst asunder in madness against me because I say this: not because there remains anything of sin which is not remitted in baptism; but because by us who remain in the weakness of this life such sins do not cease daily to be committed, as are daily remitted to those who pray in faith and work in mercy.”

“For, since it is written, "That one should first be proved, and so minister" (1 Tim. iii. 10), much more ought he first to be proved who is taken as an intercessor for the people, lest bad priests should become the cause of the people's ruin. There can therefore be no excuse, no defence against this, since it is clearly known to all how solicitous about diligent attention to this matter is the holy and excellent teacher, who forbids that a novice should accede to sacred orders (1 Tim. iii.). But, as then one was called a novice who had been newly planted in the conversation of the holy faith, so one is now to be held to be a novice who, having been suddenly planted in the habit of religion, creeps on to canvass for sacred dignities. Orders, then, should be risen to in an orderly way: for he courts a fall who seeks to rise to the topmost heights of a place by steep ascents, disregarding the steps that lead to it. And, seeing that the same apostle teaches his disciple, among other directions with regard to sacred orders, that hands are to be laid hastily on no man (1 Tim. v.), what can be more hasty or what more headlong than to begin at the top, and that a man should commence by being a bishop before he has been a minister?”

“Above the Apostle showed what sort of person a bishop ought to be in himself; here he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to the multitude. And first with respect to the multitude of his household family; second with respect to the multitude of the Church, at *not a neophyte*; third with respect to the multitude of unbelievers, at *but it is necessary*. Again, first he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to his household family; second he assigns the reason for this, at *but if anyone*. Again, first he shows that due governance of the family is required of a bishop; second, the good instruction of his children, at *having children*. He says therefore: a bishop must preside well over his household, that is, his family, so that he governs it well. But good governance is not only the acquisition of riches, since these are not the end of household management but instruments; rather its end is right living. Ecclesiasticus 44:6: *making peace in their houses*. But especially in the household family the children are foremost. And therefore he says of them specifically, *having his children in subjection*, that is, that he should rule over his children without being softened by the tenderness of love, which sometimes he extends toward his children. Now among the other things which are required in the children of bishops — the children they had before they were bishops — it is required that they be chaste. Therefore it is added, *with all chastity*, because their evil life would be a testimony against their parent and prelate. Ecclesiasticus 10:2: *as the judge of the people is himself, so also his ministers; and as is the ruler of a city, such also are those dwelling in it*. Wisdom 4:6: *for all the children who are born of unlawful unions are witnesses of wickedness against their parents in their examination*. The second reason is that the people gather at the bishop's house, and therefore it is necessary that they be chaste. Against this stands 1 Kings 2:22, where the sons of Heli, not chaste, corrupted the women coming to the temple. Hence Heli too was punished by the Lord. Then when he says *but if anyone*, he assigns the reason for what he has said. For someone could say: what does it matter to a bishop that he govern his family well, since the common care presses upon him? And therefore he says, *but if anyone* [know not how to rule] *his own house*, etc., namely his own family. Luke 16:10: *he who is faithful in the least is faithful also in the greater*. Yet it happens frequently that some are not good at ruling in small household matters who nevertheless rule well in greater ones. But what he says, *know not*, this not-knowing refers to negligence. For he who neglects small things easily neglects great ones, although one who does not care about small things sometimes conducts himself well in greater ones. Consequently he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of the Church, in which he ought not to be a novice in the faith, but of long standing. Hence he says *not a neophyte*, that is, one having a new faith. Acts 1:21: *it is necessary to choose one of those who [have been] with us, et cetera*. Again, Numbers 11:16: *gather to me seventy men of the elders, whom you know to be elders of the people and masters and leaders, et cetera*. But, as it is said in Wisdom 4:8, *venerable old age is not that of long duration, nor counted by the number of years*. For it happens sometimes that grace abounds in some newcomers, and they have, together with youthful age, an old age of character — men who are advanced by dispensation, as Ambrose was by divine inspiration. Hence what he says here pertains to those who are neophytes not only in age, but who are also neophytes in perfection. And the reason for this is *lest into pride, et cetera*. For when someone newly coming to the faith is also advanced to some position, he reckons himself better than others and greatly necessary, as if, unless he existed, they would have no means by which the Church could be provided for. And he says *of the devil*, because the devil himself was condemned on account of the sin of pride. Then when he says *but it is necessary that he*, etc., he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of unbelievers, and he sets down the proofs. First, that he be of good reputation. Colossians 4:5: *walk in wisdom toward those who are outside*. 1 Peter 2:12: *having your conduct good among the gentiles*. And this is necessary for a prelate, because the conduct of the whole congregation is judged by the prelate. But on the contrary, 2 Corinthians 6:8: *through infamy and good report*. I respond: infamy arises sometimes from the fault of the one who is defamed, and this he forbids here; sometimes from the malice of those who detract, and in this case one must have patience, and it is of this that the Apostle speaks there. But here he speaks of one to be taken up as bishop, who, even if he is good and is falsely defamed, ought to bear it patiently. Second he assigns the reason; hence he adds, *that he fall not into reproach, et cetera*. Here he touches on a twofold danger: namely lest he become an object of reproach, and by this his authority be diminished, and consequently the boldness of correcting be taken away. Matthew 7:5: *cast out first the beam, et cetera*. Second, lest he fall into the snare of the devil, namely sometimes by bearing it impatiently, through which the defamed man is stirred up to hatreds, and despairs, and the like. And that a prelate be hateful to the laity happens if he neglects the worship of divine praise. Malachi 2:8f: *you have made void the covenant of Levi, says the Lord of hosts, wherefore I have given you contemptible and low before all the people*. Then when he says *deacons*, etc., he shows the things pertaining to deacons, which in Greek is the same as ministers. For in the primitive Church there were only three orders, as Dionysius says, namely of bishops, of presbyters, and of ministers; and they were not divided into different grades, but all were in one order, on account of the scarcity of ministers and on account of the newness of the Church. First therefore he shows what sort they ought to be in themselves; second, with respect to others, at *women*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be; second, how they are to be examined, at *and let these*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be with respect to their own body; second, with respect to external things, at *not [given to] filthy [lucre]*; third, with respect to other things, at *holding*, et cetera. Again with respect to the body, first he shows the qualities as to the whole body; second, as to the restraint of the mouth. He says therefore: I say that bishops ought to be chaste, and likewise deacons must be, because the contrary of chastity makes one unfit for spiritual things, since it draws the mind away from spiritual things, which such men must needs have raised up. Isaiah 52:11: *be clean, you who carry the vessels of the Lord*. Luke 12:35: *let your loins be girded*. Then he shows what sort they ought to be as to the mouth. The mouth serves speech and taste. As to the first he says, *not double-tongued*. Ecclesiasticus 28:16: *a third tongue has stirred up many, and scattered them from nation to nation*. The double-tongued is one having two tongues. Such deacons will not be ministers of peace. As to the second he says, *not much [wine]*. Proverbs 23:29f: *who has woe? whose father has woe? who has quarrels? who has pits? who has wounds without cause? who has the digging under of the eyes? Is it not those who linger over wine and study to drink up cups?* Isaiah 5:22: *woe to you who are mighty to drink wine, and men strong to mix drunkenness*. Then when he says *not pursuing base gain*, he shows how they should conduct themselves toward external things. For not only are they sometimes turned aside from justice on account of desire for gain, but also from truth, saying things that ought not to be said. And therefore temporal gain is forbidden them, by which is understood every dishonest gain. But as to their disposition he says, *holding*, etc., and he instructs them, first as to faith, second as to purity of conscience. Hence he says *the mystery of the faith*, not *the faith*, that is, not merely simple faith, but the understanding of that which is hidden in the faith. For mystery is the same as hidden, because ministers ought to know not only those things about the faith which the people also understand, but also the mysteries, because they must instruct others. 1 Peter 3:15: *ready always to give satisfaction to everyone who asks you a reason concerning that faith and hope which is in you, et cetera*. Likewise a pure conscience, because an impure one causes one to err in the faith. Above 1:5: *but the end of the commandment is charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and an unfeigned faith*. Then when he says *and let these first be proved, and so*, etc., he shows how they are to be examined. For someone could say: I suppose all are good. For this ought to be so in your estimation, but as to their promotion, all must be examined. Hence they themselves too are examined; hence he says, *and these*, et cetera. *No crime*, that is, mortal sin; but he does not mean venial sin, because, as it is said in 1 John 1:8, *if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us*. Nor does he say, *who have had*, but *having*, that is, who are notable and have the crime of infamy upon them. Otherwise this would be to derogate from the keys of the Church. Then when he says *women*, etc., he shows how they should conduct themselves toward others. And first he sets down his instruction; second the reason, at *for he who [serves] well*. Concerning the first he does two things: for first he shows how they should conduct themselves toward their wives, whom they had in the primitive Church, and he speaks for that state of affairs. Second, how toward their children, at *who [rules] his children*. Again, the first is divided into two: for first he shows what sort their wives ought to be; second, how they themselves should conduct themselves toward them, at *deacons*. In their wives he requires four things, namely chastity, modesty, sobriety, and fidelity. He says therefore: likewise, as I have said concerning deacons, I say concerning women, that it is necessary that they be *chaste*. Ecclesiasticus 26:19: *grace upon grace is a holy and modest woman*. Likewise *modest in tongue*, *not detractors*. Ecclesiasticus 10:11: *as if a serpent should bite in silence, he who detracts has nothing less than it*. Likewise *sober*, which is the greatest ornament of women. Above 2:9: *likewise also women in seemly attire, with modesty and sobriety*. Likewise *faithful*, either to God as to true faith, or to their husbands. But what fault is it of the deacon's if his wife is bad? I respond: someone is kept back from ministry not only on account of fault, but also on account of some impediment to the ministry. And therefore, even if apart from their own fault their wives could be bad, nevertheless they present an impediment in two ways: first, because when they are bad, they need greater care, and by this their husbands would have less leisure for ecclesiastical ministries; second, because husbands are corrupted by their wives. Likewise it would be a danger, because many people frequent the houses of the ministers of the Church. But the Cataphrygians said that, since among the deacons mention is made of women, women can be ordained to sacred orders. But it must be known that in law some women are sometimes called deaconesses, not because they have an order of this kind, but on account of some ministry of the Church, just as in Greek any minister is called a deacon.”

“And let these also first be proved,.... Not that they should be tried in any part of the deacon's office, to see how capable they are of performing it; but their internal and external characters are to be looked into and examined, and if they appear, to be right, then they are to be approved of, chosen and called unto, and invested with the office: then let them use the office of a deacon; let them be employed and minister in the several parts and branches of that office: being found blameless; not without sin, but free from any gross and enormous one; not before God, but in the sight of men; See Gill on Ti1 3:2.”

“Let these - be proved - Let them not be young converts, or persons lately brought to the knowledge of the truth. This is the same in spirit with what is required of the bishops, Ti1 3:6. Let no man be put into an office in the Church till he has given full proof of his sincerity and steadiness, by having been for a considerable time a consistent private member of the Church. Being found blameless - Ανεγκλητοι οντες· Being irreproachable; persons against whom no evil can be proved. The same as in Ti1 3:2, though a different word is used. See the note on Ti1 3:2.”

“"And moreover," &c. [ALFORD]. be proved--not by a period of probation, but by a searching inquiry, conducted by Timothy, the ordaining president (Ti1 5:22), whether they be "blameless"; then when found so, "let them act as deacons." blameless--Greek, "unexceptionable"; as the result of public investigation unaccused [TITTMANN].”