A.D. 407 – 1871 8 witnesses 9 excerpts
“Appoint, therefore, for yourselves, bishops and deacons worthy of the Lord, men meek, and not lovers of money, and truthful and proved; for they also render to you the service of prophets and teachers. Despise them not therefore, for they are your honoured ones, together with the prophets and teachers.”
“For when St. Paul said, "Moreover he must have good testimony from them that are without," he does not do away with careful and exact scrutiny, nor does he set up this testimony as a chief sign of assurance about such men. But having listed many requirements already, he added this one afterwards, to show that we must not be content with it alone for this kind of election but only take it into account along with other considerations. For it often happens that popular report is false.”
“"Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil." This is rightly said, as he was certain to be reproached by them, and for the same reason perhaps he said, "the husband of one wife," though elsewhere he says, "I would that all men were even as I myself!" that is, practicing continency. That he may not therefore confine them within too narrow a limit, by requiring an over-strict conversation, he is satisfied to prescribe moderate virtue. For it was necessary to appoint one to preside in every city, as he writes to Titus, "That thou shouldest ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee." But what if he should have a good report, and fair reputation, and not be worthy of it? In the first place this would not easily happen. It is much for good men to obtain a good report among their enemies. But, in fact, he has not left this to stand by itself; a good report "also," he says, that is, besides other qualities. What then, if they should speak evil of him without a cause from envy, especially as they were Heathens? This was not to be expected. For even they will reverence a man of blameless life. Why then does he say, speaking of himself, "Through evil report and good report"? Because it was not his life that they assailed, but his preaching. Therefore he says, "through evil report." They were slandered as deceivers and impostors, on account of their preaching, and this because they could not attack their moral characters and lives. For why did no one say of the Apostles, that they were fornicators, unclean, or covetous persons, but that they were deceivers, which relates to their preaching only? Must it not be that their lives were irreproachable? It is manifest. Therefore so let us too live, and no enemy, no unbeliever, will be able to speak evil of us. For he whose life is virtuous, is revered even by them. For truth stops the mouths even of enemies. But how does he "fall into a snare"? By falling often into the same sins, as those who are without. For if he be such a character, the evil one soon lays another snare for him, and they soon effect his destruction. But if he should have a good report from his enemies, much more will he have it from his friends. For that it is not likely that he, whose life is blameless, should be ill-reported of, we may infer from the words of Christ; "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in Heaven." But what if one be falsely accused, and from peculiar circumstances be slandered? Well this is a possible case; but even such an one ought not to be promoted. For the result is much to be feared. Therefore it is said he should have "a good report," for your good works are to shine. As therefore no one will say that the sun is dark, not even the blind, (for he will be ashamed to oppose the opinion of all,) so him that is of remarkable goodness no one will blame. And though, on account of his doctrines, the Heathen will often slander him, yet they will not attack his virtuous life, but will join with others in admiring and revering it.”
“This is not the praise given a man by a few wise and just people but popular report. Indeed, popular report bestows greatness and renown on a man, which is not desirable for its own sake but is essential to the success of good men in their endeavors to benefit their fellow men. So the apostle says that it is proper to have a good report of those that are without. For though they are not infallible, the luster of their praise and the odor of their good opinion are a great help to the efforts of those who seek to benefit them. This popular renown is not obtained by those who are highest in the church, unless they expose themselves to the toils and hazards of an active life.”
“The wishes of the congregation and the testimony of the populace should certainly be waited for. The opinions of the nobles and the choice of the clerics should be asked for. These are the procedures ordinarily observed in the consecrating of bishops by those who know the decrees of the Fathers. That would be to preserve in every way the requirement made by apostolic authority which demands that a bishop who is to be in charge of a church must be supported not only by the testimony of his congregation but by a good reputation among outsiders as well. No opportunity for such a scandal should be left. One who is going to be the teacher of peace is himself consecrated in peace and in harmony pleasing to God, through the common efforts of all.”
“Above the Apostle showed what sort of person a bishop ought to be in himself; here he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to the multitude. And first with respect to the multitude of his household family; second with respect to the multitude of the Church, at *not a neophyte*; third with respect to the multitude of unbelievers, at *but it is necessary*. Again, first he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to his household family; second he assigns the reason for this, at *but if anyone*. Again, first he shows that due governance of the family is required of a bishop; second, the good instruction of his children, at *having children*. He says therefore: a bishop must preside well over his household, that is, his family, so that he governs it well. But good governance is not only the acquisition of riches, since these are not the end of household management but instruments; rather its end is right living. Ecclesiasticus 44:6: *making peace in their houses*. But especially in the household family the children are foremost. And therefore he says of them specifically, *having his children in subjection*, that is, that he should rule over his children without being softened by the tenderness of love, which sometimes he extends toward his children. Now among the other things which are required in the children of bishops — the children they had before they were bishops — it is required that they be chaste. Therefore it is added, *with all chastity*, because their evil life would be a testimony against their parent and prelate. Ecclesiasticus 10:2: *as the judge of the people is himself, so also his ministers; and as is the ruler of a city, such also are those dwelling in it*. Wisdom 4:6: *for all the children who are born of unlawful unions are witnesses of wickedness against their parents in their examination*. The second reason is that the people gather at the bishop's house, and therefore it is necessary that they be chaste. Against this stands 1 Kings 2:22, where the sons of Heli, not chaste, corrupted the women coming to the temple. Hence Heli too was punished by the Lord. Then when he says *but if anyone*, he assigns the reason for what he has said. For someone could say: what does it matter to a bishop that he govern his family well, since the common care presses upon him? And therefore he says, *but if anyone* [know not how to rule] *his own house*, etc., namely his own family. Luke 16:10: *he who is faithful in the least is faithful also in the greater*. Yet it happens frequently that some are not good at ruling in small household matters who nevertheless rule well in greater ones. But what he says, *know not*, this not-knowing refers to negligence. For he who neglects small things easily neglects great ones, although one who does not care about small things sometimes conducts himself well in greater ones. Consequently he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of the Church, in which he ought not to be a novice in the faith, but of long standing. Hence he says *not a neophyte*, that is, one having a new faith. Acts 1:21: *it is necessary to choose one of those who [have been] with us, et cetera*. Again, Numbers 11:16: *gather to me seventy men of the elders, whom you know to be elders of the people and masters and leaders, et cetera*. But, as it is said in Wisdom 4:8, *venerable old age is not that of long duration, nor counted by the number of years*. For it happens sometimes that grace abounds in some newcomers, and they have, together with youthful age, an old age of character — men who are advanced by dispensation, as Ambrose was by divine inspiration. Hence what he says here pertains to those who are neophytes not only in age, but who are also neophytes in perfection. And the reason for this is *lest into pride, et cetera*. For when someone newly coming to the faith is also advanced to some position, he reckons himself better than others and greatly necessary, as if, unless he existed, they would have no means by which the Church could be provided for. And he says *of the devil*, because the devil himself was condemned on account of the sin of pride. Then when he says *but it is necessary that he*, etc., he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of unbelievers, and he sets down the proofs. First, that he be of good reputation. Colossians 4:5: *walk in wisdom toward those who are outside*. 1 Peter 2:12: *having your conduct good among the gentiles*. And this is necessary for a prelate, because the conduct of the whole congregation is judged by the prelate. But on the contrary, 2 Corinthians 6:8: *through infamy and good report*. I respond: infamy arises sometimes from the fault of the one who is defamed, and this he forbids here; sometimes from the malice of those who detract, and in this case one must have patience, and it is of this that the Apostle speaks there. But here he speaks of one to be taken up as bishop, who, even if he is good and is falsely defamed, ought to bear it patiently. Second he assigns the reason; hence he adds, *that he fall not into reproach, et cetera*. Here he touches on a twofold danger: namely lest he become an object of reproach, and by this his authority be diminished, and consequently the boldness of correcting be taken away. Matthew 7:5: *cast out first the beam, et cetera*. Second, lest he fall into the snare of the devil, namely sometimes by bearing it impatiently, through which the defamed man is stirred up to hatreds, and despairs, and the like. And that a prelate be hateful to the laity happens if he neglects the worship of divine praise. Malachi 2:8f: *you have made void the covenant of Levi, says the Lord of hosts, wherefore I have given you contemptible and low before all the people*. Then when he says *deacons*, etc., he shows the things pertaining to deacons, which in Greek is the same as ministers. For in the primitive Church there were only three orders, as Dionysius says, namely of bishops, of presbyters, and of ministers; and they were not divided into different grades, but all were in one order, on account of the scarcity of ministers and on account of the newness of the Church. First therefore he shows what sort they ought to be in themselves; second, with respect to others, at *women*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be; second, how they are to be examined, at *and let these*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be with respect to their own body; second, with respect to external things, at *not [given to] filthy [lucre]*; third, with respect to other things, at *holding*, et cetera. Again with respect to the body, first he shows the qualities as to the whole body; second, as to the restraint of the mouth. He says therefore: I say that bishops ought to be chaste, and likewise deacons must be, because the contrary of chastity makes one unfit for spiritual things, since it draws the mind away from spiritual things, which such men must needs have raised up. Isaiah 52:11: *be clean, you who carry the vessels of the Lord*. Luke 12:35: *let your loins be girded*. Then he shows what sort they ought to be as to the mouth. The mouth serves speech and taste. As to the first he says, *not double-tongued*. Ecclesiasticus 28:16: *a third tongue has stirred up many, and scattered them from nation to nation*. The double-tongued is one having two tongues. Such deacons will not be ministers of peace. As to the second he says, *not much [wine]*. Proverbs 23:29f: *who has woe? whose father has woe? who has quarrels? who has pits? who has wounds without cause? who has the digging under of the eyes? Is it not those who linger over wine and study to drink up cups?* Isaiah 5:22: *woe to you who are mighty to drink wine, and men strong to mix drunkenness*. Then when he says *not pursuing base gain*, he shows how they should conduct themselves toward external things. For not only are they sometimes turned aside from justice on account of desire for gain, but also from truth, saying things that ought not to be said. And therefore temporal gain is forbidden them, by which is understood every dishonest gain. But as to their disposition he says, *holding*, etc., and he instructs them, first as to faith, second as to purity of conscience. Hence he says *the mystery of the faith*, not *the faith*, that is, not merely simple faith, but the understanding of that which is hidden in the faith. For mystery is the same as hidden, because ministers ought to know not only those things about the faith which the people also understand, but also the mysteries, because they must instruct others. 1 Peter 3:15: *ready always to give satisfaction to everyone who asks you a reason concerning that faith and hope which is in you, et cetera*. Likewise a pure conscience, because an impure one causes one to err in the faith. Above 1:5: *but the end of the commandment is charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and an unfeigned faith*. Then when he says *and let these first be proved, and so*, etc., he shows how they are to be examined. For someone could say: I suppose all are good. For this ought to be so in your estimation, but as to their promotion, all must be examined. Hence they themselves too are examined; hence he says, *and these*, et cetera. *No crime*, that is, mortal sin; but he does not mean venial sin, because, as it is said in 1 John 1:8, *if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us*. Nor does he say, *who have had*, but *having*, that is, who are notable and have the crime of infamy upon them. Otherwise this would be to derogate from the keys of the Church. Then when he says *women*, etc., he shows how they should conduct themselves toward others. And first he sets down his instruction; second the reason, at *for he who [serves] well*. Concerning the first he does two things: for first he shows how they should conduct themselves toward their wives, whom they had in the primitive Church, and he speaks for that state of affairs. Second, how toward their children, at *who [rules] his children*. Again, the first is divided into two: for first he shows what sort their wives ought to be; second, how they themselves should conduct themselves toward them, at *deacons*. In their wives he requires four things, namely chastity, modesty, sobriety, and fidelity. He says therefore: likewise, as I have said concerning deacons, I say concerning women, that it is necessary that they be *chaste*. Ecclesiasticus 26:19: *grace upon grace is a holy and modest woman*. Likewise *modest in tongue*, *not detractors*. Ecclesiasticus 10:11: *as if a serpent should bite in silence, he who detracts has nothing less than it*. Likewise *sober*, which is the greatest ornament of women. Above 2:9: *likewise also women in seemly attire, with modesty and sobriety*. Likewise *faithful*, either to God as to true faith, or to their husbands. But what fault is it of the deacon's if his wife is bad? I respond: someone is kept back from ministry not only on account of fault, but also on account of some impediment to the ministry. And therefore, even if apart from their own fault their wives could be bad, nevertheless they present an impediment in two ways: first, because when they are bad, they need greater care, and by this their husbands would have less leisure for ecclesiastical ministries; second, because husbands are corrupted by their wives. Likewise it would be a danger, because many people frequent the houses of the ministers of the Church. But the Cataphrygians said that, since among the deacons mention is made of women, women can be ordained to sacred orders. But it must be known that in law some women are sometimes called deaconesses, not because they have an order of this kind, but on account of some ministry of the Church, just as in Greek any minister is called a deacon.”
“Moreover, he must have a good report of them which are without, That is, "without the church", as the Arabic version reads; for wicked men, though they dislike the principles and profession of godly ministers, and despise their office, yet cannot but speak well of their becoming life and conversation. And this part of their character is necessary to invite persons to hear them, and to recommend their ministry to them, as well as for the reasons that follow: lest he fall into reproach; into the reproach of men; not only of the world, but of professors of religion; who may be apt to upbraid him with his past sins; especially such that may fall under his censures, admonitions, and reproofs, which hereby will become in a great measure useless and ineffectual: and the snare of the devil; lest Satan should take encouragement from hence to tempt him to other and greater sins; or lest finding himself slighted and despised by the people of God, because of his former sins, he should break out into anger and revenge against them; or into despondency and despair in himself; or should be negligent of his duty, and timorous of exhorting and reproving others, lest they should retort upon him, and reproach him with his former crimes. The Jews have a regard to the wisdom, prudence, gravity, and manners, of a man they appoint as a minister of a congregation. Their rule is this (z): "they do not appoint a messenger or minister of a congregation, but he who is the greatest in the congregation for wisdom and works; and if he is an elderly man, it is the better; and they take care that the messenger or minister of the congregation be a man whose voice is pleasant, and he is used to read: but he whose beard is not full grown, though he is a very considerable man, he may not be a minister of the congregation, because of the honour of the congregation.'' (z) Maimon. Hilchot Tephilla, c. 8. sect. 11.”
“The sixteenth requisite is, that he should have a good report of them which are without - That he should be one who had not been previously a profligate, or scandalous in his life. Such a person, when converted, may be a worthy private member of religious society; but I believe God rarely calls such to the work of the ministry, and never to the episcopate. Them that are without are the Jews, Gentiles, and the unconverted of all kinds. For the meaning of this term see the note on Col 4:5. Lest he fall into reproach - For his former scandalous life. And the snare of the devil - Snares and temptations, such as he fell in and fell by before. This is called the snare of the devil; for, as he well knows the constitution of such persons, and what is most likely to prevail, he infers that what was effectual before to their transgressing may be so still; therefore on all suitable occasions he tempts them to their old sins. Backsliders in general fall by those sins to which they were addicted previously to their conversion. Former inveterate habits will revive in him who does not continue to deny himself, and watch unto prayer. The snare of the devil. - Some would translate παγιδα του διαβολου, the snare of the accuser; and they give the same meaning to the word in Ti1 3:6, because it is evident that διαβολους has that meaning, Ti1 3:11, and our translators render it slanderers. Now, though διαβολος signifies an accuser, yet I do not see that it can, with any propriety, be restrained to this meaning in the texts in question, and especially as the word is emphatically applied to Satan himself; for he who, in Rev 12:10, is called the accuser of the brethren, is, in Rev 12:9, called the great dragon, the old serpent, the Devil, διαβολος, and Satan.”
“a good report--Greek, "testimony." So Paul was influenced by the good report given of Timothy to choose him as his companion (Act 16:2). of them which are without--from the as yet unconverted Gentiles around (Co1 5:12; Col 4:5; Th1 4:12), that they may be the more readily won to the Gospel (Pe1 2:12), and that the name of Christ may be glorified. Not even the former life of a bishop should be open to reproach [BENGEL]. reproach and the snare of the devil--reproach of men (Ti1 5:14) proving the occasion of his falling into the snare of the devil (Ti1 6:9; Mat 22:15; Ti2 2:26). The reproach continually surrounding him for former sins might lead him into the snare of becoming as bad as his reputation. Despair of recovering reputation might, in a weak moment, lead some into recklessness of living (Jer 18:12). The reason why only moral qualities of a general kind are specified is, he presupposes in candidates for a bishopric the special gifts of the Spirit (Ti1 4:14) and true faith, which he desires to be evidenced outwardly; also he requires qualifications in a bishop not so indispensable in others.”
The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.