The interpretation timeline
1 Timothy 5:10 Douay-Rheims

Having testimony for her good works, if she have brought up children, if she have received to harbour, if she have washed the saints’ feet, if she have ministered to them that suffer tribulation, if she have diligently followed every good work.

A.D. 220 – 1871 6 witnesses 7 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“For who would suffer his wife, for the sake of visiting the brethren, to go round from street to street to other men's, and indeed to all the poorer, cottages? Who will willingly bear her being taken from his side by nocturnal convocations, if need so be? Who, finally, will without anxiety endure her absence all the night long at the paschal solemnities? Who will, without some suspicion of his own, dismiss her to attend that Lord's Supper which they defame? Who will suffer her to creep into prison to kiss a martyr's bonds? nay, truly, to meet any one of the brethren to exchange the kiss? to offer water for the saints' feet? to snatch (somewhat for them) from her food, from her cup? to yearn (after them)? to have (them) in her mind? If a pilgrim brother arrive, what hospitality for him in an alien home? If bounty is to be distributed to any, the granaries, the storehouses, are foreclosed.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“...this name of widow is not a title of calamity but of honour, aye the greatest honour. For do not quote the erroneous opinion of the world as a testimony, but the admonition of the blessed Paul, or rather of Christ. For in his utterances Christ was speaking through him as he himself said "If ye seek a proof of Christ who is speaking in me?" What then does he say? "Let not a widow be enrolled under threescore years of age" and again "but the younger widows refuse" intending by both these sayings to indicate to us the importance of the matter. And when he is making regulations about bishops he nowhere prescribes a standard of age, but in this case he is very particular on the point, and, pray, why so? not because widowhood is greater than priesthood, but because widows have greater labour to undergo than priests, being encompassed on many sides by a variety of business public and private. For as an unfortified city lies exposed to all who wish to plunder it, so a young woman living in widowhood has many who form designs upon her on every side not only those who aim at getting her money but also those who are bent upon corrupting her modesty. ... For once when I was still a young man I know that the sophist who taught me (and he exceeded all men in his reverence for the gods) expressed admiration for my mother before a large company. For enquiring, as was his wont, of those who sat beside him who I was, and some one having said that I was the son of a woman who was a widow, he asked of me the age of my mother and the duration of her widowhood, and when I told him that she was forty years of age of which twenty had elapsed since she lost my father he was astonished and uttered a loud exclamation, and turning to those present "Heavens!" cried he "what women there are amongst the Christians." So great is the admiration and praise enjoyed by widowhood not only amongst ourselves, but also amongst those who are outside the Church. And being aware of all this the blessed Paul said "Let not a widow be enrolled under threescore years of age." And even after this great qualification of age he does not permit her to be ranked in this sacred society but mentions some additional requisites "well reported of for good works, if she have brought up children if she have lodged strangers if she have washed the saints feet if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work." Heavens! what testing and scrutiny! how much virtue does he demand from the widow, and how precisely does he define it! which he would not have done, had he not intended to entrust to her a position of honour and dignity.”
Source
“"Well reported of for good works, if she have brought up children." Truly, it is no unimportant work to bring up children; but bringing them up is not merely taking care of them; they must be brought up well; as he said before, "If they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness." (1 Tim. ii. 15) Observe how constantly he sets kindnesses to our own relatives before those to strangers. First he says, "If she have brought up children," then, "If she have lodged strangers, if she have washed the Saints' feet, if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work." But what if she be poor? Not even in that case is she debarred from bringing up children, lodging strangers, relieving the afflicted. She is not more destitute than the widow who gave the two mites. Poor though she be, she has an house, she does not lodge in the open air. "If," he says, "she have washed the Saints' feet." This is not a costly work. "If she have diligently followed every good work." What precept does he give here? He exhorts them to contribute bodily service, for women are peculiarly fitted for such attendance, for making the bed of the sick, and composing them to rest. Strange! what strictness does he require of widows; almost as much as of the Bishop himself. For he says, "If she have diligently followed every good work." This is as though he meant that, if she could not of herself perform it, she shared and cooperated in it. When he cuts off luxury, he would have her provident, a good economist, and at the same time continually persevering in prayer. Such was Anna. Such strictness does he require of widows. Greater even than of virgins, from whom he yet requires much strictness, and eminent virtue. For when he speaks of "that which is comely," and "that she may attend upon the Lord without distraction" (1 Cor. vii. 35), he gives, in a manner, a summary of all virtue. Observe, the hospitality here spoken of is not merely a friendly reception, but one given with zeal and alacrity, with readiness, and going about it as if one were receiving Christ Himself. The widows should perform these services themselves, not commit them to their handmaids. For Christ said, "If I your Master and Lord have washed your feet, ye ought also to wash one another's feet." (John xiii. 14) And though a woman may be very rich, and of the highest rank, vain of her birth and noble family, there is not the same distance between her and others, as between God and the disciples. If thou receivest the stranger as Christ, be not ashamed, but rather glory: but if you receive him not as Christ, receive him not at all. "He that receiveth you," He said, "receiveth Me." (Matt. x. 40) If you do not so receive him, you have no reward. Abraham was receiving men that passed as travelers, as he thought, and he did not leave to his servants to make the preparations for their entertainment, but took the greater part of the service upon himself, and commanded his wife to mix the flour, though he had three hundred and eighteen servants born in his house, of whom there must have been many maidservants; but he wished that himself and his wife should have the reward, not of the cost only, but of the service. Thus ought we ever to exercise hospitality by our own personal exertions, that we may be sanctified, and our hands be blessed. And if thou givest to the poor, disdain not thyself to give it, for it is not to the poor that it is given, but to Christ; and who is so wretched, as to disdain to stretch out his own hand to Christ? This is hospitality, this is truly to do it for God's sake. But if you give orders with pride, though you bid him take the first place, it is not hospitality, it is not done for God's sake. The stranger requires much attendance, much encouragement, and with all this it is difficult for him not to feel abashed; for so delicate is his position, that whilst he receives the favor, he is ashamed. That shame we ought to remove by the most attentive service, and to show by words and actions, that we do not think we are conferring a favor, but receiving one, that we are obliging less than we are obliged. So much does good will multiply the kindness. For as he who considers himself a loser, and thinks that he is doing a favor, destroys all the merit of it; so he who looks upon himself as receiving a kindness, increases the reward. "For God loveth a cheerful giver." (2 Cor. ix. 7) So that you are rather indebted to the poor man for receiving your kindness. For if there were no poor, the greater part of your sins would not be removed. They are the healers of your wounds, their hands are medicinal to you. The physician, extending his hand to apply a remedy, does not exercise the healing art more than the poor man, who stretches out his hand to receive your alms, and thus becomes a cure for your ills. You give your money, and with it your sins pass away. Such were the Priests of old, of whom it was said, "They eat up the sin of My people." (Hosea iv. 8) Thus thou receivest more than thou givest, thou art benefited more than thou benefitest. Thou lendest to God, not to men. Thou increasest thy wealth, rather than diminishest it. But if thou dost not lessen it by giving, then it is indeed diminished! "If she have received strangers, if she have washed the Saints' feet." But who are these? The distressed saints, not any saints whatever. For there may be saints, who are much waited on by every one. Do not visit these, who are in the enjoyment of plenty, but those who are in tribulation, who are unknown, or known to few. He who hath "done it unto the least of these," He saith, "hath done it unto Me." (Matt.xxv. 40)”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above he showed that widows are to be supported by the Church; here he shows what sort are to be supported. And first he shows what sort is to be chosen, second what sort is to be avoided, at the place "younger women." Concerning the first he does three things: first he shows that she is to be chosen on the basis of age; second, on the basis of chastity; third, on the basis of the practice of good works. By age, since "sixty years." But concerning which choosing is he treating? To this it can be answered in two ways. In one way, that he speaks of the choosing by which one is chosen to preside over the governance of the other widows who were being supported by the Church, so that such an elder woman should be set over them, so that no one might suspect anything of her continence. Numbers 4:3: "from thirty years and upward, even unto fifty years," etc. But it seems to the contrary, because the Church does the opposite, since younger women become abbesses. I respond: it must be said that it is disordered that girls too young should become abbesses, but nevertheless the Church's diligence is not as great in those who are enclosed as in those who are free. In another way, that he speaks of the choosing by which one is chosen for this, that she be supported by the stipends of the Church, and such a one is to be chosen not less than sixty years, because young women can labor with their hands, just as the apostle also, who although he could live from the Gospel, nevertheless labored; but old women rest. From chastity also a widow is to be chosen; therefore he says "who was the wife of one man." For just as it is required in a bishop that he be the husband of one wife, so in an old woman, that she be the wife of one husband. The Gloss: he says this on account of the aforesaid sacrament. This Gloss is a magisterial opinion and is of little worth. For the reason does not seem to be taken from any sacrament, since women do not receive any sacraments to be administered. But he says this on account of firmness, namely that they might have a continuous resolve of preserving widowhood. But Jerome, in the letter to Geruntia, elsewhere to Esicia, assigns another reason, namely that among the gentiles the custom was that in the sacred rites of the gods no woman presided who had had two husbands. And therefore the apostle wished that those who were being nourished by the sustenance of the Church should be no less chaste. Judith 15:11: "because you have loved chastity, and after your husband have not known another," etc. Luke 2:36: "she lived seven years with her husband from her virginity." And therefore it is, as it were, a praiseworthy sign of chastity, that she was the wife of one man. Then, when he says "in good works," etc., he shows that a widow is to be chosen on the basis of the practice of good works, and first in general; second in particular, at the place "if she has brought up children"; third he gives the same to be understood concerning all good works, at the place "if every work." As to the first he says "in good works." Proverbs, last chapter, 31: "let her works praise her in the gates." And he says "having testimony." John 5:36: "the works which the Father has given me to perform, these works which I do, bear testimony concerning me." For exterior works show interior faith. James 2:18: "show me your faith without works, and I will show you my faith from works." But what works? First toward her own, second toward others. Toward her own he says "if she has brought up children," namely in the fear of God and in chastity. Ecclesiasticus 7:25: "do you have sons? Instruct them." As to others, he touches on three works of piety. First, toward mercy, because women having a soft heart are naturally merciful. First, therefore, he teaches hospitality, at the place "if she has received by hospitality." Romans 12:13: "pursuing hospitality." Second, together with this he sets down humility, saying "if she has washed the feet of the saints"; for thus the saints are to be received and treated honorably. Luke 10:40: "but Martha was busy about much serving." Thus Christ, John 13:14: "if therefore I, the Lord and Master, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another's feet." The Gloss of Augustine on John: brothers do this to one another even in the visible work itself, and what they do not do with the hand, they do not do with the heart. But it is much better that it be done also with the hands, and let not the Christian disdain to do what Christ did. For he who bows down to the feet of his brother, in him humility is stirred up in the heart, or if it was already present, the effect of humility is confirmed. Third, fortitude and constancy, namely that she assist those in tribulation; hence he says "if she has ministered to those suffering tribulation." Hebrews 10:34: "you had compassion on those in bonds." Then, when he says "if every work," he concludes in what things she ought to be good, saying "if she has followed every good work," that is, has pursued it. Galatians 6:10: "while we have time, let us work good toward all." Then, when he says "younger women," etc., he shows which are to be avoided. And first he shows this; second he assigns the reason, at the place "for when they have grown wanton." He says therefore: let widows of such an age be chosen, but "avoid younger widows," that is, do not receive them indiscriminately for support in the Church, especially the disreputable and the dissolute. Or, avoid them as to companionship and familiarity. Ecclesiasticus 42:14: "better is the iniquity of a man," that is, safer to dwell with, "than a woman doing good"; hence there it is added: "and a woman bringing shame unto reproach." The first exposition is the literal one. Then, when he says "for when they have grown wanton," etc., a twofold reason is assigned from the twofold danger which threatens. Concerning the first he does two things: first he sets forth the first, second he responds to a question, at the place "having damnation." For if young women are taken up for the support of the Church, two things follow, namely that they have sufficiency, and that they are not compelled to work with their hands. But from each a danger threatens. From the first, the danger of chastity; hence he says "for when they have grown wanton." Luxuria is sometimes taken for the superfluity of the venereal act, and thus it is one of the seven capital vices; but sometimes it is taken for every superfluity of bodily things, and thus it is taken here — as if he were to say: when they have had superabundance "in Christ," that is, through the support of Christ, then they wish to marry. Exodus 32:6: "the people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play." Valerius says that from Ceres, that is, food, and father Liber, the way is near to Venus. Hosea 4:10: "they will eat, and will not be satisfied; they have fornicated, and have not ceased," etc. Then, when he says "having," etc., he responds to a tacit question. For someone could say: what evil indeed is it if they marry? For you yourself say, 1 Corinthians 7:28: "a woman does not sin if she marries." Therefore he says: in this they have damnation, because "their first faith," etc., namely of chastity, which they had vowed. For otherwise they would not have been taken up for maintenance. Hence Augustine says here, that from the resolve alone one incurs damnation. This is true if it be toward a determinate purpose and with consent. Ecclesiasticus 5:3: "if you have vowed anything to God, do not delay to pay it." Luke 9:6: "no one putting his hand to the plow and looking back is fit for the kingdom of God." From the second, namely that they do not labor, three evils follow. The first evil is idleness. Ecclesiasticus 33:29: "idleness has taught much malice." Ezekiel 16:49: "this was the iniquity of Sodom your sister: pride, fullness of bread, and abundance, and idleness." Proverbs 12:11: "he who pursues idleness is most foolish." From idleness these evils follow. The heart of a woman is not firm as that of a man, and on account of this it is moved toward diverse things. If therefore she is not bound to work, she must needs be carried toward diverse things. And therefore it is a danger that women be idle; hence the ancients kept them occupied. Likewise they become unstable as to place, because they learn to go about the houses. Proverbs 7:12: "now abroad, now in the streets, now lying in wait near the corners." Jeremiah 14:10: "she has loved to move her feet, and has not rested, and has not pleased the Lord." As to words he says "talkative." For since they are not occupied, they give themselves much to trifles. Proverbs 7:10: "garrulous, wandering, impatient of rest." As to the heart, "curious," because since they are not occupied in their own affairs, they meddle in others', and therefore they speak what is not fitting, because they pass judgment on the deeds of all. Ecclesiasticus 9:11: "her conversation burns like fire." Then, when he says "I wish therefore," etc., he shows to what work they are to be applied, namely that they marry. And first he sets forth the teaching, second he assigns the reason, at the place "for already." He says therefore "I wish the younger," namely widows, "to marry." Against this, 1 Corinthians 7:8: "it is good for them if they remain so"; therefore he ought rather to say: I wish them to remain continent. I respond: Jerome says that that saying, 1 Corinthians 7:7, he willed from his principal intention, but each one has his own gift from God. And therefore he adds: "it is better to marry than to burn." And therefore it must be seen in what case he here speaks — namely in this, lest they make void their first faith — and therefore what he says here, "I wish," is understood not from his principal intention. "To bear children," and not to kill them secretly through abortion. Above, 2:15: "but she shall be saved through the bearing of children, if she shall have continued in faith." "To be mothers of households," namely that they be occupied, and not run about the houses as talkative women. And also this I wish, "that they give no occasion to the adversary," that is, either to the Devil, or to the gentile, "for reviling's sake," that is, that he may be able to revile the Churches of God. In which he thus concludes the life of widows, that they should live in such a way that in nothing do they provoke others to wantonness. 1 Peter 2:15: "if it is the will of God, that by doing well you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men." And this is his reason: that certain women, having vowed chastity, have turned back, making void their vow. And such go after Satan, through imitation, because he apostatized from the fellowship of the Angels. Then, when he says "if any," he shows which widows are to be supported by private persons; and first he sets forth the teaching, second the reason, at the place "that it be not burdened." He says therefore that she who is truly a widow should hope in God, but now, that if any has brothers or kin, she should be supported by them. And therefore he says "if any believer," etc., because this is a work of piety. And this, "that the Church be not burdened," etc. And this was necessary, because at that time the Church did not have possessions, but now it has possessions set apart for this. 1 Thessalonians 2:9: "working night and day, that we might not burden any of you."”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Well reported of for good works,.... Both by the members of the church, and by them that were without: particularly if she have brought up children; that is, "well", as the Arabic version adds; in the nurture and admonition of the Lord; commanding them, as Abraham did, to keep the way of the Lord, and to do justice and judgment; training them up in the paths of religion and virtue, from which they will not so easily depart when grown up. If she have lodged strangers; as Abraham and Lot did, who entertained angels unawares: this may be understood of strangers in common, but especially of the brethren, ministers, and others, who came from distant parts, and travelled about to spread the Gospel of Christ. The (y) Jews say many things , "in honour of hospitality" or entertaining of strangers, especially of receiving into their houses the disciples of the wise men, and giving them food and drink, and the use of their goods; this was what gave persons a very great character with them, and highly recommended them. If she have washed the saints' feet; which was usual in those hot countries, where they wore sandals only, partly for refreshment, and partly for the removal of dust and filth, contracted in walking; instances of this we have in several places of Scripture, Gen 18:4. It was such a common piece of civility, that our Lord complains of the neglect of it towards him, Luk 7:44. It was what he did to his own disciples, and in so doing set them an example of what they should do to one another, Joh 13:14 and being a mean and low office, and which very likely was done by the servants of the house; the sense may be, if she has condescended to do the meanest office for the saints. If she have relieved the afflicted; either in body, with her purse; or in mind, by visiting them, and speaking comfortably to them: in general, if she have diligently followed every good work; not only have done good works at certain times, but has followed that which is good; has closely pursued it, and that with great eagerness and diligence; has been constant and indefatigable in the performance of it. (y) T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 63. 2.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Well reported of for good works - Numbers being able to bear testimony, as the word implies, that she has not only avoided all sin, but that she has walked according to the testimony of God. Brought up children - It was customary among the Gentiles to expose their children, when so poor that they were not able to provide for them. Pious and humane people took these up; and fed, clothed, and educated them. The words brought up may refer to the children of others, who were educated in the Christian faith by pious Christian women. Lodged strangers - If she have been given to hospitality, freely contributing to the necessitous, when she had it in her power. Washed the saints' feet - This was an office of humanity shown to all strangers and travelers in the eastern countries, who, either walking barefoot, or having only a sort of sole to defend the foot, needed washing when they came to their journey's end. Pious women generally did this act of kindness. Relieved the afflicted - Visited and ministered to the sick. Diligently followed every good work - In a word, if she have been altogether a Christian, living according to the precepts of the Gospel, and doing the Lord's work with all her heart, soul, and strength. From the character given here of the widow indeed, it may be doubted whether χηρα, widow, was not in some cases the name of an office, which name it might have from being ordinarily filled by widows. It can hardly be supposed that any widow, unless she had considerable property, could have done the things enumerated in this verse, some of which would occasion no small expense. The widow indeed may mean a person who was to be employed in some office in the Church; and Timothy is enjoined not to take any into that office unless she had been before remarkable for piety and humanity. Some think that the widows of whom the apostle speaks had been deaconesses, and wished now to be taken on what might be termed the superannuated list; and the apostle lays down rules for the admission of such, the sum of which is: Let none come on this superannuated list unless she be at least sixty years of age, and can bring proof of her having conscientiously discharged the office and duty of a deaconess.”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“for good works--Greek, "IN honourable (excellent) works"; the sphere or element in which the good report of her had place (Tit 2:7). This answers to Ti1 3:7, as to the bishop or presbyter, "He must have a good report of them which are without." if--if, in addition to being "well reported of." she . . . brought up children--either her own (Ti1 3:4, Ti1 3:12), or those of others, which is one of the "good works"; a qualification adapting her for ministry to orphan children, and to mothers of families. lodged strangers-- Ti1 3:2, "given to hospitality" (Tit 1:8); in the case of presbyters. washed . . . saints' feet--after the example of the Lord (Joh 13:14); a specimen of the universal spirit of humbly "by love serving one another," which actuated the early Christians. relieved the afflicted--whether by pecuniary or other relief. followed . . . good-- (Th1 5:15; compare instances in Mat 25:35-36).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.