The interpretation timeline
1 Timothy 6:5 Douay-Rheims

Conflicts of men corrupted in mind, and who are destitute of the truth, supposing gain to be godliness.

A.D. 215 – 1871 9 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
215
A.D.
c. A.D. 150–215
“With reason, therefore, the noble apostle, depreciating these superfluous arts occupied about words, says, "If any man do not give heed to wholesome words, but is puffed up by a kind of teaching, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh contention, envy, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, destitute of the truth." You see how he is moved against them, calling their art of logic-on which, those to whom this garrulous mischievous art is dear, whether Greeks or barbarians, plume themselves-a disease. Very beautifully, therefore, the tragic poet Euripides says in the Phoenissae,- "But a wrongful speech is diseased in itself, and needs skilful medicines." For the saving Word is called "wholesome," He being the truth; and what is wholesome (healthful) remains ever deathless. But separation from what is healthful and divine is impiety, and a deadly malady.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“The apostle forbids us to enter into hypothetical questions, or to lend our ears to newfangled statements or to consort with a heretic "after the first and second admonitions." We do not enter into these discussions. Discussion has been inhibited in this way by designating admonition as the purpose of dealing with a heretic. The first reason, too, is because he is not a Christian. The instruction is given in order that he might not, after the manner of a Christian, seem to require correction again and again and "before two or three witnesses." The impression could be created that he ought to be corrected, for the very reason that he is not to be disputed with. The second reason is that a controversy over the Scriptures can, clearly, produce no other effect than to upset either the stomach or the brain.”
Source
389
A.D.
A.D. 329–390
“I shall address my words to those whose cleverness is in words.… "Strife of words" is the term given to all elaborate verbiage by Paul, who proclaims and confirms the "short and final account," Paul, the pupil and teacher of fishermen. These people I speak of have versatile tongues and are resourceful in attacking doctrines nobler and worthier than their own. I only wish they would display comparable energy in their actions.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"Perverse disputings," that is, leisure or conversation, or he may mean intercommunication, and that as infected sheep by contact communicate disease to the sound, so do these bad men. "Destitute of the truth, thinking that gain is godliness." Observe what evils are produced by strifes of words. The love of gain, ignorance, and pride; for pride is engendered by ignorance. "From such withdraw thyself." He does not say, engage and contend with them, but "withdraw thyself," turn away from them; as elsewhere he says, "A man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject." He shows that they do not so much err from ignorance, as they owe their ignorance to their indolence. Those who are contentious for the sake of money you will never persuade. They are only to be persuaded, so long as you give, and even so you will never satisfy their desires. For it is said, "The covetous man's eye is not satisfied with a portion." From such then, as being incorrigible, it is right to turn away. And if he who had much obligation to fight for the truth, is advised not to engage in contention with such men, much more should we avoid it, who are in the situation of disciples.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above the apostle instructed Timothy about the use of foods and about the persons to whom the Church ministered nourishment; here he treats of other persons belonging to the people of the Church. And first, of persons of the lowest condition; second, of persons of higher condition, there, *to the rich*. Concerning the first he does three things: for first he sets down instruction about servants; second he refutes the contrary assertion, there, *if anyone otherwise*; third he warns them to avoid the contrary and to keep to what has been said, there, *but you*. Again, the first is divided into two: first he shows what is to be held; second he teaches that this is to be taught, there, *teach these things*. Again, first he shows how servants should conduct themselves toward unbelieving masters; second, how toward believing ones, there, *but those who*. He says therefore: *whoever are servants under the yoke*, namely, on account of servile condition, which is called a yoke by a likeness; because just as oxen are held under a yoke, so that it is not permitted them to go where they wish, so servants are under a master, so that it is not permitted them to do what they wish. Gal. 5:1: *do not again be held under the yoke of servitude*. *With all honor*, that is, with due reverence. Eph. 6:5: *servants, obey your carnal masters with all fear and trembling, in simplicity of your heart, as to Christ*. The reason for this is *lest the name of the Lord and the doctrine be blasphemed*. For if masters, seeing their unbelieving servants rebellious out of regard for the faith, they would condemn the name of Christ and blaspheme our doctrine. Rom. 2:24: *the name of Christ is blasphemed through you*. Those, therefore, who have unbelieving masters, let them obey them, lest the name of God, etc. But how toward believers? *But those who have believing masters, let them not despise them*, which sometimes happens, when familiarity is shown to those of lowest station, namely, that they are puffed up into pride. Prov. 30:21: *by three things the earth is moved, and a fourth it cannot bear: by a servant when he reigns*. And the reason for this, according to the Philosopher, is that men reason falsely in such matters; for if in one respect they see themselves equal, they believe that they are equal in all things, and are unwilling to be subject to them in anything, just as in civil wars, because the common people are not subject, they believe that they are wholly equal to the nobles. And thus it could happen that servants, seeing themselves equal to their masters in some respect, namely in faith, might reckon themselves simply equal. And therefore he says *let them not despise them*. And he sets down three things. The first is the gift of faith. Hence he says *because they are believers*, and this is very great, because the just man lives by faith. Also by it the world is overcome. The second is the dignity of divine love; therefore he says *beloved*, namely, more excellently than other creatures, because they are adopted as sons of God. 1 Jn. 3:1: *see what manner of love the Father has given us, that we should be called and should be sons of God*. The third is the benefit of grace; therefore he says *because they are partakers of the benefit*, namely as regards the sacrament of the Lord. 1 Cor. 10:16: *the bread which we break, is it not a sharing in the body of the Lord?* Ps. 118:63: *I am a partaker with all who fear you*. *Teach these things*, namely to those who do not know, *and exhort*, that those who know may fulfill them. Titus 2:15: *speak these things*, etc. Then, when he says *if anyone*, he excludes the contrary assertion. And first the manner of false doctrine; second its root, there, *proud*; third its effect, there, *from which*. If you wish to know what doctrine is erroneous, he shows this from three things. First, if it is contrary to ecclesiastical doctrine. And therefore he says *if anyone teaches otherwise*, namely than I and the other apostles, as to the first. Gal. 1:9: *if anyone preaches a gospel to you other than what you have received, let him be anathema*. For the doctrine of the apostles and prophets is called canonical, because it is, as it were, the rule of our understanding. And therefore no one ought to teach otherwise. Deut. 4:2: *you shall not add to the word which I speak to you, nor take away from it*. Apoc. ult.: *if anyone adds to these things, God will add upon him the plagues written in this book*. As to the second he says *and does not consent*, etc. For the Lord Jesus came that he might bear witness to the truth. Jn. 18:37: *for this I was born, and for this I came into the world, that I might bear witness to the truth*. And therefore he was sent by the Father as teacher and master. 1 Macc. 2:65: *listen to him always, and he will be a father to you*, etc. And therefore whoever does not consent to his words is in error. 1 Kings 15:23: *to rebel is like the sin of divination, and to be unwilling to consent is like the crime of idolatry*. And he says *sound*, because in the words of Christ there is nothing of corruption, nothing of falsity or perversity, because they are the words of divine wisdom. Prov. 8:8-9: *my words are just, there is nothing crooked or perverse in them; they are right to those who understand, and equitable to those who find knowledge*. As to the third, Prov. 6:20: *keep, my son, the precepts of your father, and do not abandon the law of your mother*. Hence he says *and to that doctrine which is according to piety*, namely ecclesiastical doctrine. This piety is through the worship of God. Titus 1:1: *according to the knowledge of the truth, which is according to piety*. The root of error, however, is twofold, namely the disposition of pride, and defect of intellect. As to the first he says *proud*. Now pride is called the root of errors in two ways: first because the proud wish to meddle with things they cannot attain to, and therefore it is necessary that they err and fail. Isa. 16:6: *his pride, and his arrogance, and his indignation are more than his strength*, etc. Also because they are unwilling to subject their understanding to another, but rely on their own prudence, and therefore are unwilling to obey sacred Scripture. Against this it is said, Prov. 3:5: *do not rely on your own prudence*. Prov. 11:2: *where there is humility, there is wisdom*. Also, defect of intellect. Here it must be known that just as in the body health is a certain equality of humors, so truth is a certain equality in the intellect, because truth is the adequation of thing and intellect. Hence just as one who is weak, when he does not have equality of constitution, is harmed by slight contrary accidents, so in the intellect, when a man is not founded in truth, nor has the power by which he can judge truth, he falls into error from any difficulty of a question whatsoever. Hence he says *sick about questions*, etc. Wisd. 9:5: *man is weak and of short time, and of lesser understanding of judgment and of laws*. As Boethius says, *the intellect is related to reason as the circle is to the center*. For reason proceeds discursively, considering the acts and defects and relation of one thing to another. And unless it resolves as far as the understanding of truth, reason is vain. Hence when it grasps the truth of a thing, it has it as it were as a center. But some proceed discursively and do not attain it. 2 Tim. 3:7: *always learning, and never coming to the knowledge of the truth*. And therefore he says *about questions*, that is, not arriving at the very center. And he says *questions*, etc., because in some matters doubt arises on the part of the thing, in others on the part of words and names. And therefore he says *questions*, as to the first, namely concerning things. Above, 1:4: *which questions promote rather than the edification of God, which is in faith*. As to the second he says *fights of words*. Prov. 19:8: *he who pursues only words will have nothing*. And he says *fights of words*, which is understood when a dissension arises from words alone. Because the Lord says, Jn. 8:36: *if the son shall make you free, you will truly be free*, and Matt. 17:25: *therefore the sons are free*, if from this some wished to infer that all Catholics, just as they are sons of God, so also would be free, it would be a fight of words, because the Lord there speaks of spiritual liberty, not carnal. Then, when he says *from which*, etc., he sets down the effect of error. And first he sets down the effect itself; second he clarifies certain things he had said, there, *but it is gain*. Again, first he shows what evils follow from false doctrine; second, in whom, there, *of men corrupted in mind*. Among the evils which he sets down, some are within, in the heart, some are external. Internal are the disordered movements with respect to good, or with respect to evil. With respect to good is envy, which is sadness at another's good; hence he says *envies*, which can be understood either in the matter at hand, or universally, because when some labor not for the truth but only for words, they do not bear it with equanimity if someone prevails. Job 5:2: *envy slays the little one*. Also in the matter at hand, because if servants are held as free and not subject, masters will envy and grieve that servants are made equal to them. Now from envy a man rises up against the neighbor whom he envies. And this is contention. Prov. 20:3: *it is an honor for a man to separate himself from contentions*. Or he rises up against God, and this is blasphemy. 2 Pet. 2:12: *blaspheming what they do not know*, etc. With respect to evil, however, is suspicion; hence he says *evil suspicions*, namely of masters against Christians, as though we had feigned liberty for gain, or that the whole of Christian doctrine had been invented only so that servants might become free. Ecclus. 3:26: *the suspicion of them has supplanted many, and has held their minds in vanity*. And from these follow conflicts against the faithful. Gen. 13:7: *there arose a quarrel between the herdsmen of Abraham's flocks and Lot's*. But this is not in the hearts of all, but of some. And he sets down three conditions of these, of which the first pertains to a defect of natural light, the second to a defect of knowledge, the third to a vice of disordered affection. As to the first he says *of men corrupted in mind*, that is, even in natural reason, who have a perverse judgment. Ps. 13:1: *they are corrupted, and have become abominable*. As to the second he says *deprived of the truth*, namely of the knowledge of it. Hos. 4:1: *there is no truth, and there is no mercy, and there is no knowledge of God in the land*. As to the third he says *esteeming gain to be piety*, that is, that the worship of God is ordered toward gain and the acquisition of riches. Wisd. 15:12: *they have esteemed our life to be a game, and our manner of living to be arranged for profit, and that one ought to acquire even from evil, from whatever source*. Men of this kind, therefore, who believe this, easily despise and fall into the aforesaid evils. Then, when he says *but it is*, he finally declares what he had said, namely that gain is piety. And first he shows how piety is related to gain; second he shows that it does not consist in the gain of external riches, there, *for those who wish*. Again, first he shows the first point; second he assigns the reason, there, *for we brought nothing*. He says therefore: those men say that gain is piety; but I say that piety is gain; therefore he adds *with sufficiency*, but of those riches which give sufficiency. And this consists in two things. In one principally, namely piety, which orders other things to God and neighbor, and these are the virtues and gifts of grace. Wisd. 7:14: *for it is an infinite treasure to men, which they who have used, have been made partakers of the friendship of God*. Second, in the sustenance of life; hence he says *with sufficiency*, that is, in those things which are necessary for life. Matt. 6:33: *seek first the kingdom of God and his justice*, etc. Above, 4:8: *piety is useful for all things*. Then, when he says *for we brought nothing*, etc., he assigns the reason for this. And first from the human condition; second from its necessity, there, *having*. Now he sets down the condition as to two things, namely as to the beginning, because *we brought nothing into this world*, etc.; as if to say: necessity suffices, superfluity is not expedient, because *we brought nothing into this world*. Job 1:21: *naked I came forth from my mother's womb*. Also as to the end, because *we shall carry nothing away*. Ps. 75:5: *they have slept their sleep, and all the men of riches have found nothing in their hands*. Job 27:19: *the rich man, when he shall sleep, shall carry nothing with him; he shall open his eyes, and shall find nothing*. Eccle. 5:15: *as he came, so shall he return*. As to necessity he says *having food, and with which we may be covered*, because goods exist on account of necessity, which man needs against what is consumed internally, and these are food; or against what is corrupted externally, and thus man needs the coverings of clothing and houses. Heb. ult.: *let your manner of life be without avarice, content with what is present*. Ecclus. 29:28: *the beginning of the life of man is water and bread, and clothing, and a house protecting shame*.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds,.... Who being corrupt in their principles, and corrupters of the word of God, dispute in a very froward and perverse way, rubbing and galling one another, and so provoke, to wrath and anger, and, every evil work: and destitute of the truth of Christ, who is the truth, knowing nothing of him spiritually and savingly; and of the Gospel, the word of truth; and also of the truth of grace, being carnal, sensual, and having not the Spirit of God. Supposing that gain is godliness; such were Simon Magus and his followers, and other false teachers, who made merchandise of men, looked everyone for his gain from his quarter, and acted as if there was nothing in religion but worldly profit and gain; these served themselves, their own bellies, and selfish interests, and not the Lord Jesus Christ. Wherefore the apostle gives the following advice to Timothy, and through him to all ministers and churches, from such withdraw thyself: do not come near them; have nothing to do with them; do not lay hands on them, or admit them into the ministry; do not suffer them to preach, or encourage them by hearing them: if in the church, cast them out; have communion with them, neither in a civil nor in a religious way; avoid all conversation with them. The Vulgate Latin and Ethiopic versions omit this clause; it is wanting in the Alexandrian copy, and in Beza's Claromontane Exemplar, but is in other copies.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds - Disputations that cannot be settled, because their partisans will not listen to the truth; and they will not listen to the truth because their minds are corrupt. Both under the law and under the Gospel the true religion was: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, soul, mind, and strength; and thy neighbor as thyself. Where, therefore, the love of God and man does not prevail, there there is no religion. Such corrupt disputers are as destitute of the truth as they are of love to God and man. Supposing that gain is godliness - Professing religion only for the sake of secular profit; defending their own cause for the emoluments it produced; and having no respect to another world. From such withdraw thyself - Have no religions fellowship with such people. But this clause is wanting in AD*FG, some others, the Coptic, Sahidic, Ethiopic, Vulgate, and Itala, one copy excepted. It is probably spurious.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Supposing gain to be piety. [3] The sense is the same, that they make a shew of piety only for gain-sake. (Witham)”
1871
A.D.
1871
“Perverse disputings--useless disputings. The oldest manuscripts read, "lasting contests" [WIESINGER]; "incessant collisions" [ALFORD]. "Strifes of words" had already been mentioned so that he would not be likely to repeat the same idea (as in the English Version reading) again. corrupt minds--Greek, "of men corrupted (depraved) in mind." The inmost source of the evil is in the perverted mind (Ti1 6:4; Ti2 3:8; Tit 1:15). destitute of the truth-- (Tit 1:14). They had had the truth, but through want of moral integrity and of love of the truth, they were misled by a pretended deeper gnosis (knowledge) and higher ascetical holiness, of which they made a trade [WIESINGER]. supposing, &c.--The Greek requires, "supposing (regarding the matter in this point of view) that piety (so translated for 'godliness') is a means of gain (that is, a way of advancing one's worldly interests: a different Greek form, poriswa, expresses the thing gained, gain)"; not "that gain is godliness," as English Version. from such withdraw thyself--omitted in the oldest manuscripts. The connection with Ti1 6:6 favors the omission of these words, which interrupt the connection.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.