And when I was come to Troas for the gospel of Christ, and a door was opened unto me in the Lord,

“These words seem on the one hand to be unworthy of Paul, if because of a brother's absence he threw away so great an opportunity of saving; and on the other, to hang apart from the context. What then? Will ye that we should first prove that they hang upon the context, or, that he hath said nothing unworthy of himself? As I think, the second, for so the other point also will be easier and clearer. How then do these words hang upon those before them? Let us recall to mind what those were, and so we shall perceive this. What then were those before? What he said at the beginning. "I would not have you," saith he, "ignorant concerning our affliction which befell us in Asia, that we were weighed down exceedingly, beyond our power." Now having shown the manner of his deliverance, and inserted the intermediate matter, he is of necessity led to teach them again that in yet another way he had been afflicted. How, and in what way? In not finding Titus. Fearful indeed, and enough to prostrate the soul, is it even to endure trials; but when there is none to comfort and that can help to bear the burden, the tempest becometh greater. He doth not say that the absence of Titus impeded the salvation of those who were about to come over, nor yet that he neglected those that believed on this account, but that he had no relief, that is, 'I was afflicted, I was distressed for the absence of my brother;' showing how great a matter a brother's absence is; and therefore he departed thence. But what means, "when I came to Troas, for the Gospel?" he saith not simply 'I arrived," but 'so as to preach.' But still, though I had both come for that and found very much to do, (for "a door was opened unto me in the Lord,") I had, saith he, "no relief," not that for this he impeded the work.”

“And again, in his second letter to the Corinthians, the same apostle says, "When I had come to Troas for the gospel of Christ, and a door was opened to me in the Lord, I had no rest in my spirit, because I did not find Titus my brother, but bidding them farewell, I went into Macedonia." To whom did he declare farewell except to those who had believed, that is to say, to those in whose hearts a door was opened for him to preach the gospel? But note well what he adds: "Now thanks be to God, who always makes us triumph in Christ and manifests the aroma of Christ to God, in those who are saved and in those who perish; to some indeed the odor of death to death but to others the fragrance of life to life." Behold why this most intrepid soldier, this most invincible defender of grace, gives thanks. Behold why he gives thanks—that the apostles are the good odor of Christ to God, both in those who are saved by his grace and in those who perish in virtue of his judgment.”

“Having set down the first cause of his delay — namely, that he might not come to them in sadness — he here sets down the second cause, which arises from the fruit he was producing in a certain place. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets down the progress of his journey; second, the effect of that progress, at the place Now thanks be to God, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he shows the impediment to bearing fruit which he had at Troas; second he adds his journey into Macedonia, at the place but taking leave, etc. He says, therefore, when I had come to Troas for the Gospel, that is, to preach Christ — John 15:16: I have appointed you that you should go, etc. — and a door was opened to me, that is, the minds of men were prepared and disposed to receive the words of preaching and Christ. 1 Cor 16:9: a door is opened to me, etc. Apoc 3:20: behold, I stand at the door, etc. But not in just any way — rather, in the Lord, because this very preparation of the human mind is from divine power. For although the readiness by which minds are prepared is the cause of conversion, yet the cause of this very readiness and preparation is God. Lam, last chapter: convert us, O Lord, to you, and we shall be converted. When, I say, a door was thus opened to me in the Lord, I had no rest for my spirit, that is, I could not do what my spirit willed, that is, dictated. For the spirit is then said to have rest when it accomplishes what it wills, just as the flesh is then said to rest when it has what it desires. Lk 12:19: my soul, you have many good things, etc. The Apostle does not say: I had no rest for my flesh or body, but for my spirit, that is, for my spiritual will, which is that I should establish Christ firmly in the hearts of men. And I was hindered, because I saw hearts prepared and disposed, and I could not preach. But as to why he had no rest for his spirit, he adds, because I did not find Titus my brother, that is, on account of the absence of Titus, and this for a twofold cause. One cause is that, although the Apostle knew all languages — so that he could say: I thank my God that I speak the language of all of you — yet he was more fluent and skilled in the Hebrew language than in the Greek, whereas Titus was more skilled in Greek. And therefore he wanted to have him present, so that he might preach at Troas. And because he was absent — for the Corinthians had detained him — he says, I had no rest for my spirit. But since the gifts of God are not imperfect, and the gift of tongues was specially conferred on the apostles for preaching throughout the whole world — Ps 18:5: their sound has gone forth into all the earth, etc. — the other cause is better, which is that many things pressed upon the Apostle to be done at Troas. For on the one hand it pressed upon him to preach to those who were prepared to receive Christ through faith; on the other hand it pressed upon him to resist the adversaries who were hindering; and therefore, because he alone could not do these things, he was distressed at the absence of Titus, who would have pressed on with the preaching and conversion of the good, while the Apostle resisted the adversaries. And he writes this to them specifically also, to intimate that not only the first cause of his delay was from them, but the second as well. For they themselves, on account of their hardness and dissension, had detained Titus for so long a time; and therefore he says, because I did not find Titus a brother — either in Christ, or as a fellow-helper. Prov 18:19: a brother who is helped by a brother, etc. And because I did not find Titus at Troas, I did not remain there, but, taking leave of them who had been converted and among whom the door had been opened, I set out for Macedonia, where I believed I would find him. The reason for his being in Macedonia is read in Acts 16:9, where it is said that a man of Macedonia, etc. Next, when he says now thanks be to God, etc., he sets down the profit of his progress, and concerning this he does two things. For first he describes the order of his progress; second he excludes the pseudo-apostles from this progress, at the place for this who is so sufficient, etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he intimates the profit he was making; second he explains a certain thing he had said, at the place a good odor of Christ, etc. Concerning the first it should be known that the Apostle attributes the profit and fruit which he was making not to himself, nor to his own virtue, but to God. 1 Cor 15:10: I labored more abundantly than all, not I, but grace, etc. And therefore he says now thanks be to God, that is, I give. 1 Thess 5:18: in all things give thanks. Eph 5:20: giving thanks, etc. Who always makes us triumph in Christ Jesus, that is, makes us triumph in the preaching of Christ against the adversaries. Here it should be known that preachers of the truth must do two things, namely exhort in sacred doctrine and overcome the one who contradicts. And this in two ways: heretics by disputation, but persecutors by patience. Hence the Apostle touches on these in order here, and therefore he says who triumphs us, as regards those who contradict. Rom 8:37: in all these things we overcome. And 1 Mac 3:19: the victory of war is not in the strength of an army, but from heaven, etc. And he manifests the odor of his knowledge through us in every place, as regards the exhortation of sacred doctrine. But the Gloss explains the odor of his knowledge as, that is, his Son; but it is better that this be said with reference to the difference between the knowledge of God which the other sciences produce and that which faith produces. For the knowledge of God which is had through the other sciences illuminates the intellect only, showing that God is the first cause, that he is one and wise, etc. But the knowledge of God which is had through faith both illuminates the intellect and delights the affection, because it says not only that God is the first cause, but that he is our savior, that he is redeemer, and that he loves us, that he became incarnate for us — all of which things inflame the affection. And therefore it must be said that the odor of his knowledge, that is, the knowledge of his sweetness, he manifests to the believer through us in every place, because this odor is diffused far and wide. Ecclus 24:23: I as the vine have brought forth fruit, etc. Gen 27:27: behold the odor of the son, etc. But because some might say: what is the odor of God in every place? For there are many places in which our preaching is not received. Therefore the Apostle explains, saying: I do not care, because whether they receive the preaching or not, nevertheless the knowledge of God is manifested everywhere through us, because we are the good odor of Christ to God, that is, to the honor of God. And he speaks after the likeness of the law, where it is said that the sacrifice is made into a most sweet odor of sweetness to God; as if he were to say: we are the holocaust which is offered to God as an odor of sweetness. And both in those who are being saved, namely so that they do not perish, which is theirs from God, and in those who are perishing, which is theirs from themselves. Hence Hosea 13:9: your destruction, Israel, is from you, etc. But is the odor the same for the good and the evil? No; rather, to some indeed it is an odor of death unto death, that is, of envy and malice occasionally leading them into eternal death — namely to those who envied the good fame of the Apostle and attacked the preaching of Christ and the conversion of the faithful. Lk 2:34: this one is set for the fall and the rising again, etc. But to others it is an odor of life, of love and good opinion leading them into eternal life — namely to those who rejoice and are converted at the preaching of the Apostle. 1 Cor 1:18: the word of the cross to those who perish, etc. But to those who are saved, etc. Thus, therefore, from the odor of the Apostle the good live, the evil die, just as it is read that at the odor of flowering vines serpents die. Next, when he says: but for these things who is so sufficient, etc., he excludes the pseudo-apostles from this profit, saying, which of those pseudo-apostles is so sufficient for these things, namely, which we true apostles do? As if he were to say: no one. Ps 138:17: your friends, O God, are exceedingly honored. But against this, Prov 27:2: let a stranger praise you, etc. To this Gregory responds, on Ezekiel, that the saints praise themselves for a twofold cause, and not on account of their own glory and vanity. The first cause is so that they may not despair in tribulations, as Job did, when his friends strove to lead him into despair: he brought back to memory the good things he had done, so that, comforted, he might not despair. Hence he said: I made a covenant with my eyes, etc. It is also read of a certain holy father that when he was tempted to despair, he brought back to memory the good things he had done, so that he might be comforted; when he was tempted to pride, he brought back to memory the evil things, so that he might be humbled. The second cause is on account of usefulness, namely so that he might be held in greater renown, and his teaching might more quickly be believed. And on account of this cause the Apostle here praises himself. For the Corinthians preferred the pseudo-apostles to him, and condemned him, and therefore did not obey him as they should. Therefore, so that they would not despise him, but obey him, he prefers himself to them and praises himself, and says but for these things who is so sufficient, as we are? Not the pseudo-apostles, because although they preach, yet they adulterate the word of God, which we do not do. Hence he says we are not as the many, namely the pseudo-apostles, adulterating the word of God, by mixing in contrary things, as heretics do, who although they confess Christ, yet do not say that he is true God. So do the pseudo-apostles, who say that with the Gospel the legal observances must be kept. Likewise not adulterating the word of God, that is, preaching either for the sake of gain, or for the sake of the favor of praise. For in this way adulterous women are so called, when they receive seed from another man for the propagation of offspring. But in preaching, the seed is nothing other than your end or intention, or the favor of one's own glory. If, therefore, your end is gain, if your intention is the favor of your own glory, you adulterate the word of God. This the pseudo-apostles were doing, who preached for the sake of gain. Below, 4:2: nor adulterating the word of God, etc. But the apostles preached neither for the sake of gain, nor their own glory, but for the sake of the praise of God and the salvation of the neighbor. And therefore he adds but from sincerity, that is, with sincere intention, not for gain, and without admixture of corruption. Above, 1:12: from sincerity, etc. But he sets down a threefold reason for this sincerity. The first reason is taken from the dignity of the one sending; for it befits a messenger of truth to speak true things. And therefore he says from God, that is, with that sincerity which is a worthy proclamation of God. 1 Pet 4:11: if anyone speaks, as the words of God. The second is taken from the authority of the one presiding, before whom he stands. Therefore he says before God, before whom we ought to speak with sincerity. 1 Kings 17:1: the Lord lives, in whose sight I stand, etc. The third is taken from the dignity of the matter of which he speaks. For the preaching of the apostles is about Christ, and therefore it ought to be sincere, just as God himself and Christ are. And therefore he says in Christ alone, not about the legal observances, as the pseudo-apostles do. 1 Cor 2:2: nor did I think that I knew anything among you, except Christ, and him crucified.”

“After these directions concerning the excommunicated person the apostle makes a long digression, to give the Corinthians an account of his travels and labours for the furtherance of the gospel, and what success he had therein, declaring at the same time how much he was concerned for them in their affairs, how he had no rest in his spirit, when he found not Titus at Troas (Co2 2:13), as he expected, from whom he hoped to have understood more perfectly how it fared with them. And we find afterwards (Co2 7:5-7) that when the apostle had come into Macedonia he was comforted by the coming of Titus, and the information he gave him concerning them. So that we may look upon all that we read from this second chapter, v. 12, to ch. 7:5, as a kind of parenthesis. Observe here, I. Paul's unwearied labour and diligence in his work, Co2 2:12, Co2 2:13. He travelled from place to place, to preach the gospel. He went to Troas from Philippi by sea (Act 20:6), and thence he went to Macedonia; so that he was prevented from passing by Corinth, as he had designed, Co2 1:16. But, though he was prevented in his design as to the place of working, yet he was unwearied in his work. II. His success in his work: A great door was opened to him of the Lord, Co2 2:12. He had a great deal of work to do wherever he came, and had good success in his work; for God made manifest the savour of his knowledge by him in every place where he came. He had an opportunity to open the door of his mouth freely, and God opened the hearts of his hearers, as the heart of Lydia (Act 16:14), and the apostle speaks of this as a matter of thankfulness to God and of rejoicing to his soul: Thanks be to God, who always causeth us to triumph in Christ. Note, 1. A believer's triumphs are all in Christ. In ourselves we are weak, and have neither joy nor victory; but in Christ we may rejoice and triumph. 2. True believers have constant cause of triumph in Christ, for they are more than conquerors through him who hath loved them, Rom 8:37. 3. God causeth them to triumph in Christ. It is God who has given us matter for triumph, and hearts to triumph. To him therefore be the praise and glory of all. 4. The good success of the gospel is a good reason for a Christian's joy and rejoicing. III. The comfort that the apostle and his companions in labour found, even when the gospel was not successful to the salvation of some who heard it, Co2 2:15-17. Here observe, 1. The different success of the gospel, and its different effects upon several sorts of persons to whom it is preached. The success is different; for some are saved by it, while others perish under it. Nor is this to be wondered at, considering the different effects the gospel has. For, (1.) Unto some it is a savour of death unto death. Those who are willingly ignorant, and wilfully obstinate, disrelish the gospel, as men dislike an ill savour, and therefore they are blinded and hardened by it: it stirs up their corruptions, and exasperates their spirits. They reject the gospel, to their ruin, even to spiritual and eternal death. (2.) Unto others the gospel is a savour of life unto life. To humble and gracious souls the preaching of the word is most delightful and profitable. As it is sweeter than honey to the taste, so it is more grateful than the most precious odours to the senses, and much more profitable; for as it quickened them at first, when they were dead in trespasses and sins, so it makes them more lively, and will end in eternal life. 2. The awful impressions this matter made upon the mind of the apostle, and should also make upon our spirits: Who is sufficient for these things? Co2 2:16. Tis hikanos - who is worthy to be employed in such weighty work, a work of such vast importance, because of so great consequence? Who is able to perform such a difficult work, that requires so much skill and industry? The work is great and our strength is small; yea, of ourselves we have no strength at all; all our sufficiency is of God. Note, If men did seriously consider what great things depend upon the preaching of the gospel, and how difficult the work of the ministry is, they would be very cautious how they enter upon it, and very careful to perform it well. 3. The comfort which the apostle had under this serious consideration, (1.) Because faithful ministers shall be accepted of God, whatever their success be: We are, if faithful, unto God a sweet savour of Christ (Co2 2:15), in those who are saved and in those also who perish. God will accept of sincere intentions, and honest endeavours, though with many they are not successful. Ministers shall be accepted, and recompensed, not according to their success, but according to their fidelity. Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the Lord, Isa 49:5. (2.) Because his conscience witnessed to his faithfulness, Co2 2:17. Though many did corrupt the word of God, yet the apostle's conscience witnessed to his fidelity. He did not mix his own notions with the doctrines and institutions of Christ; he durst not add to, nor diminish fRom. the word of God; he was faithful in dispensing the gospel, as he received it from the Lord, and had no secular turn to serve; his aim was to approve himself to God, remembering that his eye was always upon him; he therefore spoke and acted always as in the sight of God, and therefore in sincerity. Note, What we do in religion is not of God, does not come from God, will not reach to God, unless it be done in sincerity, as in the sight of God.”

“Furthermore, when I came to Troas,.... The apostle proceeds, in this latter part of the chapter, to take notice of and remove the charge of ostentation and insincerity in preaching the Gospel, and hints at other reasons of his not coming to Corinth; particularly that he took a journey to Troas, expecting to meet with Titus there, who was to give him an account of the affairs of the church at Corinth, which he was desirous of knowing before he went thither; but missing of Titus, is uneasy, and goes for Macedonia; though he was first detained awhile at Troas, having a good opportunity of preaching the Gospel there, with a prospect of success. Troas was a city of the lesser Asia near the Hellespont, formerly called Troy; of Paul's being at this place more than once, see Ti2 4:13, and of this place See Gill on Act 16:8, and of the church there; see Gill on Act 20:7. Hither he came, to preach Christ's Gospel; that Gospel, of which Christ is both the author and subject; and is no other than the good news and glad tidings of peace, pardon, righteousness, life, and salvation, by a crucified Jesus; this was his work and business; his heart was in it, he took delight in this service, and it was what he pursued in every place wherever he came; and in this place he had much encouragement; for he adds, and a door was opened unto me of the Lord; such an one as was opened to him at Ephesus, Co1 16:9; he had a good opportunity of preaching the Gospel to many souls, many were inclined to attend his ministry, from whence he conceived great hopes of doing good; a door of utterance was given to him to preach the Gospel boldly and freely, and a door of entrance for the Gospel to pass into their hearts: all which was not of men, "but of the Lord"; who has the key of David, who opens and no man shuts, shuts and no man opens.”

“, &c. When I was come to Troas….and a door was opened to me, towards promoting the gospel, which I never neglect, yet I had no rest in my spirit; I remained still in a great concern for you, not meeting with Titus, from whom I expected with impatience to hear how all things went with you at Corinth: I went on, therefore, bidding them farewell at that time, and deferred the good I might do by a longer stay with them till another time. (Witham) — Troas is the same town as the ancient Troy or Ilium, famous for its ten years’ siege, when it was destroyed by the Greeks in the year 1184, B. Christ [1184 B.C.]. (Estius) — Here, though there was a great promise of abundant fruit, St. Paul’s solicitude to meet Titus, that he might learn from him the effect of his letter, made him depart from Macedonia, where he had much to suffer. (Bible de Vence)”

“Paul expected to meet Titus at Troas, to receive the tidings as to the effect of his first Epistle on the Corinthian Church; but, disappointed in his expectation there, he passed on to Macedonia, where he met him at last (Co2 7:5-7) The history (Acts) does not record his passing through Troas, in going from Ephesus to Macedonia; but it does in coming from that country (Act 20:6); also, that he had disciples there (Act 20:7), which accords with the Epistle (Co2 2:12, "a door was opened unto me of the Lord"). An undesigned coincidence marking genuineness [PALEY, HorÃ&brvbr PaulinÃ&brvbr]. Doubtless Paul had fixed a time with Titus to meet him at Troas; and had desired him, if detained so as not to be able to be at Troas at that time, to proceed at once to Macedonia to Philippi, the next station on his own journey. Hence, though a wide door of Christian usefulness opened to him at Troas, his eagerness to hear from Titus the tidings from Corinth, led him not to stay longer there when the time fixed was past, but he hastened on to Macedonia to meet him there [BIRKS]. to preach--literally, "for the Gospel." He had been at Troas before, but the vision of a man from Macedonia inviting him to come over, prevented his remaining there (Act 16:8-12). On his return to Asia, after the longer visit mentioned here, he stayed seven days (Act 20:6). and--that is, though Paul would, under ordinary circumstances, have gladly stayed in Troas. door . . . opened . . . of the Lord--Greek, "in the Lord," that is, in His work, and by His gracious Providence.”