For I mean not that others should be eased, and you burthened, but by an equality.

“And yet Christ praised the contrary conduct in the widow's case, that she emptied out all of her living and gave out of her want. But because he was discoursing to Corinthians amongst whom he chose to suffer hunger; "for it were good for me rather to die, than that any man should make my glorying void;" he therefore uses a tempered exhortation, praising indeed those who had done beyond their power, but not compelling these to do so; not because he did not desire it, but because they were somewhat weak. For wherefore doth he praise those, because "in much proof of affliction the abundance of their joy and their deep poverty abounded unto the riches of their liberality:" and because they gave "beyond their power?" is it not very evident that it is as inducing these also to this conduct? So that even if he appears to permit a lower standard; he doth so, that by it he may raise them to this.”

“Here he leads the Corinthians to give alms by the example of Christ, saying: I wish to prove your good disposition toward giving, namely to the poor, and this you ought to do by the example of Christ. **For**, that is, *because*, **you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ**, which indeed he conferred upon the human race. John 1:17: *grace and truth came through Jesus Christ*, etc. And this is called grace, because whatever of our penalties the Son of God assumed, all of it is to be imputed to grace, since he was neither anticipated by anyone's goodness, nor compelled by anyone's power, nor induced by his own necessity. Now this is grace, since **for our sake he was made needy**. And he says *needy*, which is more than *poor*. For he is called needy who not only has little, but who lacks or is in want; whereas he is poor who has little. Therefore, to signify a greater poverty, it says **he was made needy**, namely in temporal things. Luke 9:58: *the Son of man has not*, etc. Lamentations 3:19: *remember my poverty*, etc. Now he was made needy, not out of necessity, but out of will, for otherwise this grace would no longer be grace. And therefore he says **though he was rich**, namely in spiritual goods. Romans 10:12: *the same God is rich unto all*, etc. Proverbs 8:18: *with me are riches*, etc. But he says *was* [*esset*], not *had been* [*fuisset*], lest Christ should seem to have lost spiritual riches when he assumed poverty. For he assumed this poverty in such a way that he did not lose those inestimable riches. Psalm 48:3: *rich and poor together, as one* — rich in spiritual things, poor in temporal things. Now the reason why he wished to become needy, he adds when he says **that by his want we might become rich**, that is, that by his poverty in temporal things, you might be rich in spiritual things. And this is on account of two things, namely on account of example and on account of sacrament. On account of example indeed, because if Christ loved poverty, we too, by his example, ought to love it. But by loving poverty in temporal things, we are made rich in spiritual things. James 2:5: *did not God choose the poor of this world, rich in faith*, etc. And therefore he says **that by his want**, etc. But on account of the sacrament, because all that Christ did or endured was for our sake. Hence, just as through his enduring death we have been freed from eternal death and restored to life, so through his enduring want in temporal things we have been freed from want in spiritual things, and made rich in spiritual things. 1 Corinthians 1:5: *you have been made rich in him in all knowledge*, etc. Next, when he says **in this I give counsel**, etc., he leads them to give from their own side. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets down their own advantage that arises from this; second he shows that this was also willed by them, namely that they should give alms, at **who not only**, etc. He says therefore: considering this benefit, **I give you counsel**, that is, I exhort you to this, namely to give alms — not only for the benefit of the saints who are in Jerusalem, but also for your own benefit. Proverbs 27:9: *the soul is sweetened by the counsels of a good friend*, etc. And this because **it is useful to you**. For the good of piety is more useful to the one who does it than to the one for whom it is done, because the doer thereby carries away a spiritual benefit, while the recipient carries away a temporal one. And just as the spiritual ought to be preferred to the temporal, so in works of piety the advantage of the giver is preferred to the advantage of the recipient. 1 Timothy 4:8: *piety is profitable to all things*. But this is not only useful to them, but they themselves also willed it, and therefore he says **because not only**, etc. Here he does three things. First he calls to mind the good beginning that was in them; second he exhorts them to the due completion, at **but now also in deed**, etc.; third he explains something he had said, at **for if the will**, etc. He says therefore: truly you ought to give alms gladly, because it is not only useful to you, but you yourselves also began to will this of your own accord, namely to give alms, **from the year before**, that is, when I came to you. Or **from the year before**, that is, the preceding one. As if he were saying: to will is more than to do, according to Ecclesiasticus 18:16: *a word is better than a gift*, etc. And therefore you ought to be ready to give. And because you are ready to give, therefore now **complete in deed** what you had in mind, otherwise that will would be in vain. John 4: *let us not love in word, nor in tongue*, etc. Philippians 1:6: *he who began in you*, etc. And the reason for this is: just as the mind of the will, that is, the discretion of the will — according to the Gloss, is ready — so let the discretion for accomplishing be ready. Or, otherwise, that *mind* be taken for *will*; and then it is said: just as you were ready to will, so be ready to accomplish. And this **from what you have**, that is, according to your means. Next he explains what he means by **from what you have**, saying **for if**, etc., as if he were saying: I say that you ought to be ready to give, and in this I do not intend to burden you — namely, that you should give beyond your means, because perhaps a ready will induces you to this, but in this matter the deed cannot imitate the will. And therefore he says: **from what you have** — *for* here stands for *because* — if the will is ready according to what it has, **it is accepted**. And the reason for this is that the will is accepted in the perfection of the operation; but the work is not perfected except from what one has. And therefore he says **according to what one has, it is accepted**. Tobit 4:9: *if you have much, give abundantly*, etc. Next, when he says **for not that to others**, etc., he removes a certain suspicion. For these might say: if we give alms to the poor saints who are in Jerusalem, they will live idly, and we will suffer loss, and thus we will be made wretched. Therefore the Apostle first excludes this suspicion; second he makes plain his own intention; third he confirms it by authority. He removes the suspicion when he says **for not that to others**, etc., as if he were saying: I do not so counsel you to give alms that there be relief to others, while they live idly on your alms, but tribulation to you, that is, poverty, in that you would be afflicted. But do they sin, those who give everything to others and are themselves afterward afflicted by poverty? And it seems that they do, by these words of the Apostle. I respond: it must be said, according to the Gloss, that it would be better to give everything to the poor and be afflicted for Christ. But what he says here, he did by condescension, because they were weak, and might perhaps fail if they were pressed by want. He makes plain his own intention when he says **but from equality**, etc., as if he were saying: I do not intend your tribulation, but a certain equality, namely that **your abundance**, etc. This can be explained in three ways: first, concerning equality of quantity; second, concerning equality of proportion; third, concerning equality of will. Concerning equality of quantity: because these, namely the Corinthians, abounded in temporal things and were lacking in spiritual things, while the saints who were in Jerusalem abounded in spiritual things and were lacking in temporal things. He wishes, then, that there be an equality of quantity between them, namely that those who abound in temporal things should give half of all to those who lack them, and these should give half of their spiritual things to them, so that thus they might be equally rich. And therefore he rather says this: that from equality of quantity, that is, from half the part of your goods, **in the present time**, which is brief, **your abundance** of earthly things may **supply their want**, who have forsaken all the things of the world, and that their abundance, namely in spiritual things, may be the supplement of your want in spiritual things, that is, that you may be partakers of eternal life. Luke 16:9: *make for yourselves friends*, etc. Ecclesiasticus 14:15f.: *in the division of the lot, give and receive* — give temporal things and receive spiritual things. But concerning equality of proportion, it is explained thus, and better: you, Corinthians, have an abundance of temporal things; the saints who are in Jerusalem, an abundance of spiritual things. I wish, then, a certain equality — not one according to quantity, but according to proportion — namely, that just as they are sustained by your alms, so you may be enriched by their prayers before God. For just as they are not so enriched by your temporal goods as you are rich, so neither are you enriched by their spiritual goods as they are. And therefore he says **but from equality**, etc.: let your aforesaid abundance of earthly things supply their want, namely the saints', in temporal things, so that their abundance also, in spiritual things, etc. 1 Corinthians 9:11: *if we have sown spiritual things for you*, etc. But concerning equality of will, it is explained thus: **but from equality**, etc., that is, I wish that there be in you an equality of will, namely that just as they have the will to share with you those things in which they abound, so you may have the will to share with them those things in which you abound. Next he confirms this by authority. Hence he says **as it is written**, namely Exodus 16: **he who had much** — namely, had gathered of the manna, that is, who had more than a gomor — **did not abound**, that is, did not have beyond his sufficiency; **and he who had little, did not have less**, that is, it did not fail him, because all abounded equally, as is said in Exodus 16. And thus neither did he who had gathered more have more, nor did he who had prepared less find less.”

“For I mean not that other men he eased , and ye burdened. I do not enjoin on you such liberal almsgiving as to enable the poor to live in luxury and you in need, but I wish every one to think of the necessities of others according to his power, without neglecting his own (Theophylact). S. Paul does not enjoin this, but he counsels it. It is, say S, Thomas and Anselm, an evangelical counsel, and, therefore, a sign of greater perfection, to give all your goods to the poor and become wholly poor yourself. “ If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou bast and give to the poor,” said Christ (S. Matt. xix. 21). This can be done not only by those who are going to devote themselves to the religious life, but even by those who remain in the world, as, eg., by the poor widow (S. Mark xii. 43). Do not mistake me : any one may do this provided he do not bring himself into extreme necessity, and if he has no family, for whom he is bound to provide. Theophylact adds that in the next verse the Apostle RULE OF ALMSGIVING II 7 exhorts the Corinthians to give beyond their strength, when he says u that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want," meaning : If you wish for a great reward, give liberally ; if for the whole reward, give your all. He takes abundance to mean profuse almsgiving, abounding beyond their strength, such as S. Paul praised in the Macedonians. The reason is this, that such an act is one of supreme, heroic almsgiving, poverty, fortitude, and hope in God. We have a striking example of this in S. Paulinus, Bishop of Nola, who, after spending all his goods on the poor, at last gave himself up to the Vandals to be enslaved in the place of the son of a widow. His self-abnegation is praised by S. Augustine (de Civ. Dei lib. L c. io). The event showed that his action was pleasing to God, for, when he was living as a slave, he was recognised by the Vandals under the inspiration of God, and was honourably treated and sent back home. S. Paula, again, was so liberal to the poor that her frequent prayer was heard, and, according to her wish, she had to be buried at the expense of others, and in another’s garments. S. Jerome, in his Life of her, praises her warmly for this. S. Martin, S. John the Almoner, and many others are examples of the same liberality. But abundance in this verse more properly denotes the abundant wealth of the Corinthians ; for S. Paul contrasts it with the poverty of the Christians of Jerusalem, and desires that one may relieve the other”

“For I mean not that other men be eased and you burdened. Referring either to the givers; and that either to the richer and meaner sort in this church; the apostle's sense being, not to put the whole burden of the collection upon some only, whilst others were excused doing little or nothing; but that everyone should give according to his ability; or to other churches in poorer circumstances; and the apostle's meaning was, not that these churches by reason of their meanness should be entirely free from this service, as it was plain they were not, by the instance of the Macedonians; and that the whole be devolved upon the Corinthian church, and others that were rich; but that all should contribute according to their circumstances: or this may refer to the persons given to, and for whom this beneficence was asked; for the words may be rendered, "for not that there may be ease", or relaxation "to others, and to you affliction" or straitness; that is, his meaning was, not that there should be such a contribution raised for these poor saints at Jerusalem, that they should live in ease and great abundance; whilst their benefactors, through an over abundant generosity to them, were straitened, and their families reduced to great difficulties; this was what was far from his intentions. For I mean not that other men be eased and you burdened. Referring either to the givers; and that either to the richer and meaner sort in this church; the apostle's sense being, not to put the whole burden of the collection upon some only, whilst others were excused doing little or nothing; but that everyone should give according to his ability; or to other churches in poorer circumstances; and the apostle's meaning was, not that these churches by reason of their meanness should be entirely free from this service, as it was plain they were not, by the instance of the Macedonians; and that the whole be devolved upon the Corinthian church, and others that were rich; but that all should contribute according to their circumstances: or this may refer to the persons given to, and for whom this beneficence was asked; for the words may be rendered, "for not that there may be ease", or relaxation "to others, and to you affliction" or straitness; that is, his meaning was, not that there should be such a contribution raised for these poor saints at Jerusalem, that they should live in ease and great abundance; whilst their benefactors, through an over abundant generosity to them, were straitened, and their families reduced to great difficulties; this was what was far from his intentions. 2 Corinthians 8:14 co2 8:14 co2 8:14 co2 8:14But by an equality,.... All that he meant was, that there might be an equality both in givers and receivers, proportioned to their several circumstances and stations of life: that now at this time; which was a very necessitous time at Jerusalem, there being a famine there, and their common stock exhausted: your abundance may be a supply for their want, that their abundance also may be a supply for your want; which respects either the different abilities of givers at different times; and that whereas now the church at Corinth was rich, and wealthy, and had great abundance of the things of this world, they in this general collection were able to make up the deficiencies of other churches; and so should it ever be their case, as it might be, that they should be reduced, and these other churches increased, and enjoy a large abundance, they might hereafter in their turn supply what would be wanting in them: or else the persons given to; and the sense is, that should they ever change circumstances, as it was not impossible that they that were now rich should become poor, and they that were poor become rich; then as their abundance had been a supply to the wants of others, the abundance of others in their turn would be a supply to their wants; so that the argument is taken from the hope of retribution, in case of such vicissitudes; see Luk 6:38 his view was, that there may be equality; either that in time to come an equal return may be made, should it be necessary; or that at present some sort of equality might be observed between the rich and poor; that the rich should so distribute as not to leave themselves without a proper support, according to their station of life; and yet so freely communicate, that the poor may not be without food and raiment, suitable to their lower sphere of life.”