For also when we were with you, this we declared to you: that, if any man will not work, neither let him eat.

“But let every one that cometh in the name of the Lord be received, and afterward ye shall prove and know him; for ye shall have understanding right and left. If he who cometh is a wayfarer, assist him as far as ye are able; but he shall not remain with you, except for two or three days, if need be. But if he willeth to abide with you, being an artisan, let him work and eat; but if he hath no trade, according to your understanding see to it that, as a Christian, he shall not live with you idle. But if he willeth not to do, he is a Christ-monger. Watch that ye keep aloof from such.”

“The prophets were His servants, and foresaw Him by the Spirit, and waited for Him as their Teacher, and expected Him as their Lord and Saviour, saying, "He will come and save us." Let us therefore no longer keep the Sabbath after the Jewish manner, and rejoice in days of idleness; for "he that does not work, let him not eat." For say the [holy] oracles, "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat thy bread." But let every one of you keep the Sabbath after a spiritual manner, rejoicing in meditation on the law, not in relaxation of the body, admiring the workmanship of God, and not eating things prepared the day before, nor using lukewarm drinks, and walking within a prescribed space, nor finding delight in dancing and plaudits which have no sense in them. And after the observance of the Sabbath, let every friend of Christ keep the Lord's Day as a festival, the resurrection-day, the queen and chief of all the days [of the week]. Looking forward to this, the prophet declared, "To the end, for the eighth day," on which our life both sprang up again, and the victory over death was obtained in Christ, whom the children of perdition, the enemies of the Saviour, deny, "whose god is their belly, who mind earthly things," who are "lovers of pleasure, and not lovers of God, having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof."”

“(This being then an unquestionable position, I ask) which God has the greater fight to be angry? He, as I suppose, who from the beginning of all things has given to man, as primary witnesses for the knowledge of Himself, nature in her (manifold) works, kindly providences, plagues, and indications (of His divinity), but who in spite of all this evidence has not been acknowledged; or he who has been brought out to view once for all in one only copy of the gospel-and even that without any sure authority-which actually makes no secret of proclaiming another god? Now He who has the right of inflicting the vengeance, has also sole claim to that which occasions the vengeance, I mean the Gospel; (in other words, ) both the truth and (its accompanying) salvation. The charge, that "if any would not work, neither should he eat," is in strict accordance with the precept of Him who ordered that "the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn should not be muzzled.”

“Let the young persons of the Church endeavour to minister diligently in all necessaries: mind your business with all becoming seriousness, that so you may always have sufficient to support yourselves and those that are needy, and not burden the Church of God. For we ourselves, besides our attention to the word of the Gospel, do not neglect our inferior employments. For some of us are fishermen, some tentmakers, some husbandmen, that so we may never be idle. So says Solomon somewhere: "Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways diligently, and become wiser than she. For she, having neither field, overseer, nor ruler, prepareth her food in the summer, and layeth up a great store in the harvest. Or else go to the bee, and learn how laborious she is, and her work how valuable it is, whose labours both kings and mean men make use of for their health. She is desirable and glorious, though she be weak in strength, yet by honouring wisdom she is improved, etc. How long wilt thou lie on thy bed, O sluggard? When wilt thou awake out of thy sleep? Thou sleepest awhile thou liest down awhile, thou slumberest awhile, thou foldest thy hands on thy breast to sleep awhile. Then poverty comes on thee like an evil traveller, and want as a swift racer. But if thou beest diligent, thy harvest shall come as a fountain, and want shall fly from thee as an evil runagate." And again: "He that manageth his own land shall be filled with bread." And elsewhere he says: "The slothful has folded his own hands together, and has eaten his own flesh." And afterwards: "The sluggard hides his hand; he will not be able to bring it to his mouth." And again: "By slothfulness of the hands a floor will be brought low." Labour therefore continually; for the blot of the slothful is not to be healed. But "if any one does not work, let not such a one eat" among you. For the Lord our God hates the slothful. For no one of those who are dedicated to God ought to be idle.”

“Therefore also the Scripture has sent the sluggard to the ant, saying, "Go to the ant, you sluggard, emulate his ways, and be wiser than he." Are you unwilling, he means, to learn from the Scriptures, that it is good to labor, and that he who will not work neither should eat? Learn it from the irrational beasts! We do the same in our families, urging those who have erred—though they be older and considered superior—to observe thoughtful children. We say, "Note how earnest and watchful this child is, though he is younger than you." In the same way learn from the ant the best exhortation to hard work. Marvel at your Lord, not only because he has made heaven and the sun, but because he has also made the ant. For although the ant is small, it proves the greatness of God's wisdom. Consider, then, how prudent the ant is. Consider how God has implanted in so small a body such an unceasing desire for work! But while you learn the lesson of hard work from the ant, learn from the bee a lesson of neatness, industry and social concord! For the bee labors more for us than for herself, working every day. This is indeed a thing especially proper for a Christian, not to seek his own welfare, but the welfare of others. As, then, the bee travels across the meadows that she may prepare a banquet for another, so also O man, you do likewise. And if you have accumulated wealth, spend it on others. If you have the ability to teach, do not bury the talent, but bring it out publicly for the sake of those who need it! Or if you have any other advantage, become useful to those who reap the benefit of your labors.”

“In the first place, we must prove that the blessed apostle Paul wished the servants of God to perform manual labor which would merit a great spiritual reward, and to do this without seeking food and clothing from anybody but to procure these commodities for themselves by their own work. Secondly, we must show that those gospel precepts by which some monks justify not only laziness but even arrogance are not contrary to the direction and example of the apostle. Let us examine the statements made by the apostle prior to this one: "If any man will not work, neither let him eat," and the statements which follow it, so that the meaning which St. Paul intended may be gathered from the setting of the passage. What can be said in reply to this, since, indeed, by his own example he taught what he commanded, lest later someone might be permitted to interpret this with a view to his will and not his charity. For, the Lord had directed that apostle, as preacher of the gospel, as soldier of Christ, as planter of the vineyard, as shepherd of the flock, to live by the Gospel; nevertheless, St. Paul did not accept the payment due him in order to give example to those who wished to exact unmerited compensation.”

“Above, the Apostle showed what he handed on to them by his own example, namely that they should not be restless, but that they should work; here he shows how he handed this on in the present passage by words and by deeds. Hence he says *when we were*, as if to say: that we might give you a model, we did what we taught, because we declared this, that, etc. These words, as the Gloss says, and Augustine in the book *On the Works of Monks*, certain men were perverting, to mean that it is not lawful for the servants of God to work with their hands, on account of what is said in Matthew 6:34: *be not solicitous*, etc. For they say that this work pertains to solicitude for sustenance. And on account of this they referred this to spiritual works; as if to say: if anyone does not want to do meritorious and spiritual works, he is not worthy to eat. But this is against the intention of the Apostle, who says *we declared* that we ourselves did so, namely in labor and weariness. But what is the meaning of *because if anyone does not want*, etc.? Is this a counsel or a precept? And it seems to be a precept, because below it is said: *if anyone does not obey our word*, etc. Therefore all are bound to work with their hands. Whoever therefore does not work with his hands, but stands idle, sins mortally. I answer. It must be said that it is a precept, but a thing is commanded in two ways: simply, or under a condition. That which is of itself necessary for salvation is commanded simply, and these are the works of the virtues. But under a condition, as when such is the case that the precept cannot be kept without manual work. Now it is commanded to man that he sustain his own body, for otherwise he is a murderer of himself. Genesis 2:16: *of every tree of Paradise you may eat*, etc. By precept, therefore, man is bound to nourish his own body, and likewise we are bound to all the things without which the body cannot live. Hence whoever does not have another means by which to sustain his body lawfully, either by possession or by lawful business, is bound to labor, lest he steal. Ephesians 4:28: *he who stole, let him now steal no more, but rather let him labor, working with his hands*, etc. It is therefore a precept, when one cannot otherwise live lawfully. Hence he says *if anyone does not want to work, neither let him eat*. One or the other of two things is therefore necessary, that a man may eat, namely either that he have a possession, or that he procure it lawfully. Psalm 127:2: *the labors of your hands, for you shall eat*, etc. 1 Thessalonians 4:11: *work with your hands, as we commanded you*, etc. Then when he says *we have heard*, etc., he sets forth the necessity of this precept, because the Apostle says this not so much from the office of a teacher, as on account of a vice of the people. Therefore first he sets forth the fault which induces the necessity of the precept; second he applies a remedy, at the place *but to those who*, etc. He says therefore *we have heard*, etc.; as if to say: therefore I do not conceal this precept, because we have heard that certain ones, etc. For the soul of man must always be occupied about something, and therefore it is necessary that the idle suffer restlessness about unlawful things. 1 Thessalonians 4:11: *give heed that you be quiet*, etc. And he adds *but acting curiously*, namely about the affairs of others. Proverbs 21:25: *desires kill the slothful*. Then he applies a remedy, when he says *but to those who*, etc. And first on the part of those sinning, second on the part of the others, at the place *but you*, etc. He says therefore, to those who are of this sort *we declare* — severely, as a prelate — and *we beseech* — charitably, as their father — that their own bread, not another's but owed to them, namely lawfully acquired, *with silence*, that is, without restlessness, not running about, they eat. Isaiah 30: the cultivation of justice is silence. Ezekiel: idleness taught much malice. Then when he says *but you*, etc., on the part of the others not sinning he applies a twofold remedy. First, namely, that they not cease from doing good; second, that they correct those men, at the place *but if anyone*, etc. He says therefore *but you*, etc., as if to say: do not fail in doing good, even though the idle abuse it. Galatians 5: *doing good, let us not fail*, etc. And this is necessary, even if they should work with their hands, and nothing should be lacking to them, because assistance to others is necessary. Then when he says *but if anyone*, etc., he signifies that they be corrected, and first he shows in what order they are punished; second he shows the effect of the punishment, at the place *that they may be ashamed*; third the end, at the place *and do not*, etc. As to the order indeed: first, he sets forth the fault, second its manifestation, third its punishment. The fault is disobedience; and therefore he says *but if anyone does not obey*. 1 Kings 15:23: *to resist is as it were the sin of divination, and to be unwilling to acquiesce is as it were the crime of idolatry*. The manifestation and the conviction is set forth, when he says *note this man by an epistle*, that is, make him manifest, but through an inquiry into the truth. Job 29:16: *the cause which I did not know, I investigated most diligently*. Their punishment is the sentence of excommunication; hence he says *and do not mingle with him*, etc. 1 Corinthians 5:11: *with such a one not even to take food*. 2 John, v. 10: *do not receive him into the house, nor say to him, hail*. Here note that excommunication is inflicted for disobedience; he must, however, be convicted. Hence he says *if anyone does not obey*, by your epistle, *note this man*, that is, signify him to us, that he may be punished; and yet you meanwhile are not to mingle with him. But the effect of the punishment is that he be ashamed, and from this come to his senses. Ecclesiasticus 4:25: *there is a shame that brings sin, and there is a shame that brings glory*. But the end and intention ought to be his correction, which charity intends; hence he says *and do not regard him as*, because it ought not to be done out of the rancor of hatred, but out of zeal for charity; as if to say: let your avoiding of him not be done out of the hatred of enmity. Matthew 5:44: *love your enemies, do good to those who hate you*. And therefore he says *but correct him as a brother*. In which charity is shown. Psalm 132:1: *behold how good, and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in one*, etc. Then when he says *but he himself*, etc., he concludes the epistle. And first the conclusion is set forth; second the salutation, which is as it were the seal of the epistle, at the place *the salutation*, etc. Again the first is divided into two, because he first wishes them the gifts of God, second God himself, at the place *the Lord be*, etc. As to the first he says *he himself*, etc. God is said to be of peace with respect to two things. For peace consists in two things, namely that a man be in concord with himself, and with others. And neither can be had sufficiently except in God: because he is not in concord with himself sufficiently except in God, and less so with others, because then the affection of man is in concord within itself when that which is desired according to one thing suffices with respect to all, which nothing can be except God. Psalm 102:5: *who fills your desire with good things*. For whatever other things, besides God, do not suffice for all, but God suffices. John 16:33: *in me you shall have peace*, etc. Likewise men are not united among themselves, except in that which is common among them, and this is above all God. And therefore he says *may the God of peace give* — not a temporal peace, but an everlasting one, that is, a spiritual one, which begins here, and is perfected there. Psalm 147:3: *who has placed peace as your borders*, etc. And this *in every place*, and in the whole world among the faithful. As to the second he says *the Lord be with you all*, because nothing else is well possessed, unless he himself be possessed through faith and charity. *My salutation*, he says this on account of unfaithful men perverting his epistles. Galatians, last chapter: *see with what letters I have written to you with my own hand*, etc. *Which is a sign*, etc. *Grace*, that is, the gratuitous gift of God, which renders you pleasing to God, etc. John 1:17: *grace and truth came through Jesus Christ*.”

“For even when we were with you,.... At Thessalonica in person, and first preached the Gospel to them, we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat; the Ethiopic version reads in the singular number, "when I was with you, I commanded you"; using the above words, which were a sort of a proverb with the Jews, and is frequently used by them, , or , "that if a man would not work, he should not eat" (q). And again (r), "he that labours on the evening of the sabbath (or on weekdays), he shall eat on the sabbath day; and he who does not labour on the evening of the sabbath, from whence shall he eat (or what right and authority has he to eat) on the sabbath day?'' Not he that could not work through weakness, bodily diseases, or old age, the necessities of such are to be distributed to, and they are to be taken care of, and provided with the necessaries of life by the officers of the church; but those that can work, and will not, ought to starve, for any assistance that should be given them by the members of the church, or the officers of it. (q) Bereshit Rabba, sect. 14. fol. 13. 1. Echa Rabbati, fol. 48. 4. & Midrash Koholet, fol. 65. 4. (r) T. Bab. Avoda Zara, fol. 3. 1.”

“If any would not work, neither should he eat - This is a just maxim, and universal nature inculcates it to man. If man will work, he may eat; if he do not work, he neither can eat, nor should he eat. The maxim is founded on these words of the Lord: In the sweat of thy brow thou shall eat bread. Industry is crowned with God's blessing; idleness is loaded with his curse. This maxim was a proverb among the Jews. Men who can work, and will rather support themselves by begging, should not get one morsel of bread. It is a sin to minister to necessities that are merely artificial.”

“Not work. By prying with curiosity into other men’s actions. He that is idle, saith St. Chrysostom, will be given to curiosity. (Witham) — The apostles, like our Lord, were fond of introducing popular saying or axioms. Another, and not unlike the former, is found in one of the Jewish rabbies, Zeror: Qui non laboraverit in Prosabbato, nč edat in Sabbato.”

“For even--Translate, "For also." We not only set you the example, but gave a positive "command." commanded--Greek imperfect, "We were commanding"; we kept charge of you. would not work--Greek, "is unwilling to work." BENGEL makes this to be the argument: not that such a one is to have his food withdrawn from him by others; but he proves from the necessity of eating the necessity of working; using this pleasantry, Let him who will not work show himself an angel, that is, do without food as the angels do (but since he cannot do without food, then he ought to be not unwilling to work). It seems to me simpler to take it as a punishment of the idle. Paul often quotes good adages current among the people, stamping them with inspired approval. In the Hebrew, "Bereshith Rabba," the same saying is found; and in the book Zeror, "He who will not work before the sabbath, must not eat on the sabbath."”