The interpretation timeline
2 Timothy 2:14 Douay-Rheims

Of these things put them in mind, charging them before the Lord. Contend not in words, for it is to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.

A.D. 215 – 1871 11 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
215
A.D.
c. A.D. 150–215
“This the Scripture has expressed with the greatest possible brevity, when it said, "Be not occupied much about words." For expression is like the dress on the body. The matter is the flesh and sinews. We must not therefore care more for the dress than the safety of the body. For not only a simple mode of life, but also a style of speech devoid of superfluity and nicety, must be cultivated by him who has adopted the true life, if we are to abandon luxury as treacherous and profligate, as the ancient Lacedaemonians adjured ointment and purple, deeming and calling them rightly treacherous garments and treacherous unguents; since neither is that mode of preparing food right where there is more of seasoning than of nutriment; nor is that style of speech elegant which can please rather than benefit the hearers. Pythagoras exhorts us to consider the Muses more pleasant than the Sirens, teaching us to cultivate wisdom apart from pleasure, and exposing the other mode of attracting the soul as deceptive. For sailing past the Sirens one man has sufficient strength, and for answering the Sphinx another one, or, if you please, not even one. We ought never, then, out of desire for vainglory, to make broad the phylacteries. It suffices the gnostic if only one hearer is found for him. You may hear therefore Pindar the Boeotian, who writes, "Divulge not before all the ancient speech. The way of silence is sometimes the surest. And the mightiest word is a spur to the fight." Accordingly, the blessed apostle very appropriately and urgently exhorts us "not to strive about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers, but to shun profane and vain babblings, for they increase unto more ungodliness, and their word will eat as doth a canker."”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“Just as they carefully prepared their will and testament, and committed it to a trust, and adjured (the trustees to be faithful to their charge), even so do I hold it.”
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord, that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers." It is an overawing thing to call God to witness what we say, for if no one would dare to set at nought the testimony of man when appealed to, much less when the appeal is to God. If any one, for instance, entering into a contract, or making his will, chooses to call witnesses worthy of credit, would any transfer the things to those who are not included? Surely not. And even if he wishes it, yet fearing the credibility of the witnesses, he avoids it. What is "charging them before the Lord"? he calls God to witness both what was said, and what was done. "That they strive not about words to no profit;" and not merely so, but "to the subverting of the hearers." Not only is there no gain from it, but much harm. "Of these things then put them in remembrance," and if they despise thee, God will judge them. But why does he admonish them not to strive about words? He knows that it is a dainty thing, and that the human soul is ever prone to contend and to dispute about words. To guard against this, he has not only charged them "not to strive about words," but to render his discourse more alarming, he adds, "to the subverting of the hearers."”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“A good teacher chooses a good life in such a way that he does not also neglect good repute but provides "what may be good not only before God but also before men" insofar as he is able by fearing God and caring for men. In his speech itself he should prefer to please more with the meanings expressed than with the words used to speak them. Nor should he think that anything may be said better than that which is said truthfully. Nor should the teacher serve the words but the words the teacher.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above, the preparation for martyrdom was set forth; here the exhortation to it is set forth, and first he sets forth in advance the example of the reward; second, the example of martyrdom, at in which I labor; third, he shows the connection of the reward to martyrdom, at faithful is the saying. For the reward of the precious death of martyrdom is the glorious resurrection, the example of which preceded in Christ our head. And therefore he says be mindful, etc., as if to say: our Lord Jesus Christ — supply: keep him in mind against tribulations. Prov. 3:6: In all your ways think on him, and he will direct your steps. For there are many things to be thought about in him, but especially the resurrection. To this all things are ordered, and especially the whole state of the Christian religion. Rom. 10:9: If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. And note that he says raised up, because although the Father raised him, yet he also rose by his own power, and he is the first of those rising, 1 Cor. 15:20. But because he rose according to human nature, and died, of the seed of David. Rom. 1:3: who was made to him of the seed of David according to the flesh, et cetera. According to my Gospel, that is, preached by me. 1 Cor. 15:1: But I make known to you the Gospel which I preached to you. He who preaches the Gospel is a minister of the Gospel, just as he who baptizes is a minister of Baptism. Yet it cannot be said "my Baptism," but "my Gospel" can be said thus. And this is so because exhortation and solicitude contribute much. Then, when he says in which I labor, he shows himself as an example of martyrdom, and first its punishment; second its cause, at therefore all things. Now he shows three things to be in the punishment, namely bitterness, reproach, and constancy. Bitterness, when he says in which, namely in preaching the Gospel, or for which I labor, that is, I am afflicted, and this even unto bonds, because when he wrote this epistle, he was at Rome in bonds. Eph., last chapter: the ministry of the Gospel, for which I act as ambassador in a chain. Reproach as regards unbelievers, when he says as an evildoer. For Christians then were reputed the worst. Lc. 9: Blessed will you be when men hate you, and separate you, and reproach you, et cetera. Christ too was condemned, as an evildoer. Is. 53:12: and he was reputed with the wicked. But he shows constancy, when he says but the word of God, et cetera. For although the body is bound, yet the word of God is not bound, because preaching came from the will of the apostle, which is free, especially on account of the efficacy of charity, which fears nothing. Rom. 8:38: For I am certain that neither death, nor life, et cetera. Because, as it is said in 1 Jn. 3:20, God is greater than our heart. And it is said that, existing in bonds, he converted many. Then, when he says therefore I endure all things, he shows the cause, because it is not the punishment that makes a martyr, but the cause. Now the cause of martyrdom is twofold, namely for the sake of divine honor, and the salvation of one's neighbor. For the sake of God indeed, because Rom. 8:36: for your sake we are put to death all the day long. For the salvation of neighbors, because he says here for the sake of the elect. Jn. 15:13: Greater love has no one, than that someone lay down his life for his friends. 1 Jn. 3:16: because he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. And he says for the sake of the elect, because whatever good things happen, they redound especially to the good of the elect, not of the reprobate. And how? That they too may obtain salvation. But is the Passion of Christ sufficient? It must be said that it is, effectively, but the passion of the apostle was expedient in two ways. First, because it gave an example of persisting in the faith; second, because the faith was confirmed, and from this they were led to salvation. And this in Christ, that is, which comes to us through him. Matt. 1:21: for he will save the people from their sins. And this not only salvation, present in grace, but also with heavenly glory. Matt. ch. 5:12: your reward is abundant in the heavens. Then, when he says faithful is the saying, he sets forth the connection of the reward to the merit of martyrdom. And first he sets forth the attestation; second, the consequence, at for if we have died together; third, he confirms it by testimony, at these things put in remembrance. He says therefore faithful is the saying, that is, the word which I shall say is faithful. Apoc., last chapter: these words are most faithful, et cetera. Then, when he says for if, et cetera, he sets forth the consequence. And first concerning the reward of the good; second concerning the punishment of the evil, at if we deny. In the reward of the good there are two things, namely restoration through the resurrection, and the addition of glory to which they will rise. And therefore first he shows that through Christ one comes to the restoration of life; second that through him one comes to the resurrection, at if we endure. He says therefore if we have died together, namely with Christ, and this through the reception of the sacrament in Baptism. Rom. 6:4: for we are buried together with him through Baptism into death. Likewise through penance, by mortifying ourselves. Gal. 6:24: those who are Christ's have crucified their flesh with the vices and lusts. Likewise by dying for the confession of truth, just as Christ also did. Ps. 115:15: Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints. If therefore we have died together, we shall also live together, that is, just as he rose, so shall we too. Rom. 6:5: If we have been planted together with the likeness of his death, we shall be also of his resurrection. Then he treats of the glory, which the saints merit through the ignominy of death. Lc., last chapter: was it not necessary that Christ should suffer these things? And therefore he says if we endure, namely afflictions and reproaches patiently, we shall reign together, that is, we shall arrive at the kingdom together with him. Matt. 5:10: Blessed are those who persecution, et cetera. Then, when he says if we deny, he shows the consequence as regards punishments. Now one can sin against the faith in two ways: first, by denying it outwardly; second, by laying it aside inwardly. As to the first, he says if we deny, namely before others, he will deny us in judgment. Matt. 25:12: Amen I say to you, I do not know you. To deny is not to acknowledge them to be of his own sheep. As to the second, he says if we do not believe, that is, if we cast faith from the heart, he remains faithful, that is, he holds to his own faithfulness. Hence he remains faithful in his faith, because faith is nothing other than participation in, or adherence to, the truth. But he himself is the very truth, which cannot deny itself. Therefore he is not omnipotent. I respond. From this he is omnipotent, that he cannot deny himself. For to be able to fail pertains rather to impotence, because that something should fail from its own being is through a weakness of its own power. But for Christ to deny himself is to fail from himself; this very fact, therefore, that he cannot deny himself, is the reason of perfect power. Hence sin does not fall upon him, as has been said, nor can he deny his power and his justice without punishing. Matt., last chapter: but he who does not believe will be condemned. But can God not remit the punishment to someone? He can indeed according to the order of his wisdom, but against the order of wisdom and justice, he cannot. Then, when he says these things put in remembrance, et cetera, he confirms it by testimony; as if to say: I admonish along with others, that you may always keep it in your heart, testifying before God, that is, bringing forward as witness him before whom I speak. Then, when he says do not with words, he shows how he resists unbelievers, because first he sets forth in advance the manner of resisting; second he shows what the things are which he resists, at profane. Likewise, first he excludes the undue manner of resisting; second he sets forth the due manner, at diligently. Concerning the first, first he excludes the undue manner; second he assigns the reason, at to nothing. He says therefore do not contend with words. Contention implies a contending in words. It can therefore be understood in two ways, because one speaking with acrimony is depraved in two ways. In one way, if by this one inclines to the favor of falsity, as when someone attacks the truth with a confident clamor. In another way, on account of disorder, as when one uses acrimony either beyond the due measure, or contrary to the quality of the person. But if it is done moderately, and with due circumstances, and on behalf of the truth, it is not a sin. And thus in rhetoric it is one instrument of exhortation. Yet in sacred Scripture it is taken according as it implies disorder. 1 Cor. 11:16: If anyone seems to be contentious among you, we have no such custom, nor does the Church of God. And he says with words, because some dispute only with words of reproach. And this properly is to contend. If this is done not with words only but with true reasons, this is to dispute, not to contend. Then, when he says it is useful for nothing, he shows the reason for the teaching. For moderate disputation, when it is done with reason, is useful for instruction; but when it is with words only, then it is litigious. Therefore he says but to the subverting, and this in two ways: in one way, while what is certain comes into doubt; in another way, because the hearers are scandalized. Prov. 14:23: Where there are many words, there is frequently poverty; hence Jas. 3:16: Where there is envy and contention, there is inconstancy and every wicked work. But should one not dispute about the faith before the people without contention? I respond. A distinction must be made, on the part of the hearers, because either they are being solicited by unbelievers, and then public disputation is useful: because through this the simple are made more instructed when they see those who err refuted. But if they are not being solicited by unbelievers, then disputation is not useful, but dangerous. Likewise a distinction must be made on the part of the one disputing, because if the disputant is prudent, so that he clearly refutes the adversary, then he ought to dispute publicly; but if not, in no way. Then, when he says diligently take heed to yourself, he sets forth the due manner of resisting. And first as regards right intention; second as regards right action; third as regards right doctrine. For he who wishes to dispute must first examine his own intention, whether he is moved by good zeal. Therefore he says to show himself approved to God, who indeed tests the heart. 2 Cor. 10:18: For it is not he who commends himself that is approved, but he whom God commends. Ps. 16:3: You have proved my heart, and visited it by night. Likewise, that he confirm through his works the doctrine which he preaches with his mouth, which unless he does, he is worthy of confusion. Hence he says a workman that need not be ashamed, as if to say: do these things, and thus you will not be put to confusion. Likewise, that he rightly handle the word of truth, teaching things true and useful to the hearers. Hence he adds rightly handling the word of truth, not seeking gain and glory. 2 Cor. 2:17: We are not like many, adulterating the word of God, but out of sincerity, as from God, in the sight of God, we speak in Christ.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1714
A.D.
Matthew Henry Reformed
1662–1714
“Having thus encouraged Timothy to suffer, he comes in the next place to direct him in his work. I. He must make it his business to edify those who were under his charge, to put them in remembrance of those things which they did already know; for this is the work of ministers; not to tell people that which they never knew before, but to put them in mind of that which they do know, charging them that they strive not about words. Observe, Those that are disposed to strive commonly strive about matters of very small moment. Strifes of words are very destructive to the things of God. That they strive not about words to no profit. If people did but consider of what little use most of the controversies in religion are, they would not be so zealous in their strifes of words, to the subverting of the hearers, to the drawing of them away from the great things of God, and occasioning unchristian heats and animosities, by which truth is often in danger of being lost. Observe, People are very prone to strive about words, and such strifes never answer any other ends than to shake some and subvert others; they are not only useless, but they are very hurtful, and therefore ministers are to charge the people that they do not strive about words, and they are most likely to be regarded when they charge them before the Lord, that is, in his name and from his word; when they produce their warrant for what they say. - Study to show thyself approved unto God, Ti2 2:15. Observe, The care of ministers must be to approve themselves unto God, to be accepted of him, and to show that they are so approved unto God. In order thereunto, there must be constant care and industry: Study to show thyself such a one, a workman that needs not be ashamed. Ministers must be workmen; they have work to do, and they must take pains in it. Workmen that are unskilful, or unfaithful, or lazy, have need to be ashamed; but those who mind their business, and keep to their work, are workmen that need not be ashamed. And what is their work? It is rightly to divide the word of truth. Not to invent a new gospel, but rightly to divide the gospel that is committed to their trust. To speak terror to those to whom terror belongs, comfort to whom comfort; to give every one his portion in due season, Mat 24:45. Observe here, 1. The word which ministers preach is the word of truth, for the author of it is the God of truth. 2. It requires great wisdom, study, and care, to divide this word of truth rightly; Timothy must study in order to do this well. II. He must take heed of that which would be a hindrance to him in his work, Ti2 2:16. He must take heed of error: Shun profane and vain babblings. The heretics, who boasted of their notions and their arguments, thought their performances such as might recommend them; but the apostle calls them profane and vain babblings: when once men become fond of those they will increase unto more ungodliness. The way of error is down-hill; one absurdity being granted or contended for, a thousand follow: Their word will eat as doth a canker, or gangrene; when errors or heresies come into the church, the infecting of one often proves the infecting of many, or the infecting of the same person with one error often proves the infecting of him with many errors. Upon this occasion the apostle mentions some who had lately advanced erroneous doctrines: Hymeneus and Philetus. He names these corrupt teachers, by which he sets a brand upon them, to their perpetual infamy, and warns all people against hearkening to them. They have erred concerning the truth, or concerning one of the fundamental articles of the Christian religion, which is truth. The resurrection of the dead is one of the great doctrines of Christ. Now see the subtlety of the serpent and the serpent's seed. They did not deny the resurrection (for that had been boldly and avowedly to confront the word of Christ), but they put a corrupt interpretation upon that true doctrine, saying that the resurrection was past already, that what Christ spoke concerning the resurrection was to be understood mystically and by way of allegory, that it must be meant of a spiritual resurrection only. It is true, there is a spiritual resurrection, but to infer thence that there will not be a true and real resurrection of the body at the last day is to dash one truth of Christ in pieces against another. By this they overthrew the faith of some, took them off from the belief of the resurrection of the dead; and if there be no resurrection of the dead, nor future state, no recompence of our services and sufferings in another world, we are of men the most miserable, Co1 15:19. Whatever takes away the doctrine of a future state overthrows the faith of Christians. The apostle had largely disproved this error (1 Cor. 15), and therefore does not here enter into the arguments against it. Observe, 1. The babblings Timothy was to shun were profane and vain; they were empty shadows, and led to profaneness: For they will increase unto more ungodliness. 2. Error is very productive, and on that account the more dangerous: it will eat like a gangrene. 3. When men err concerning the truth, they always endeavour to have some plausible pretence for it. Hymeneus and Philetus did not deny a resurrection, but pretended it was already past. 4. Error, especially that which affects the foundation, will overthrow the faith of some.”
Source
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Of these things put them in remembrance,.... Meaning either his hearers, or those to whom he was to commit the things he had heard of the apostle, and who must expect to suffer afflictions, and endure hardships, for the sake of Christ, and his Gospel; wherefore to remind them of the above sayings might be of use and comfort to them. This clause is wanting in the Arabic version. Charging them before the Lord; the omniscient God, as in his sight, as they will answer it to him another day; see Ti1 5:21, that they strive not about words; it became them to strive and contend for the form of sound words, for the wholesome words or doctrines of our Lord Jesus, but not about mere words, and especially such as were to no profit; to no advantage to truth, nor to themselves nor others; were not to edification, to spiritual edification, to godly edifying, which is in faith: but to the subverting of the hearers; the confounding of their minds, misleading their judgments, and overthrowing their faith; and therefore were not only unprofitable, but hurtful and pernicious, and by all means to be avoided.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“That they strive not about words - Words, not things, have been a most fruitful source of contention in the Christian world; and among religious people, the principal cause of animosity has arisen from the different manner of apprehending the same term, while, in essence, both meant the same thing. All preachers and divines should be very careful, both in speaking and writing, to explain the terms they use, and never employ them in any sense but that in which they have explained them. The subverting of the hearers - This is the general tendency of all polemical divinity and controversial preaching, when angry passions are called in to support the doctrines of the Gospel.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Give this admonition to all, especially to the ministers of the gospel, that they may expose themselves willingly to suffer every thing for the establishment of the faith in Jesus Christ. — Testifying. Call God to witness the truths which you announce to the faithful; and for your part, do not amuse yourself with disputes about words. In the Greek it is thus translated by many: Warn them of these things, by conjuring them in the name of the Lord not to amuse themselves with disputes about words. (Calmet)”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“Lit. "not to engage in wordy strife for nothing useful, to the subverting of the hearers." The Alexandrian and Ephrem manuscripts, and the Ethiopic ver- sion, have the imperative. Wordy strife is forbidden to the faithful, but the maintenance of the truth against gainsayers is a duty of the ministers of religion.”
1871
A.D.
1871
“them--those over whom thou dost preside (Tit 3:1). charging--Greek, "testifying continually": "adjuring them." before the Lord-- (Ti1 5:21). that they strive not about words--rather, "strive with words": "not to have a (mere) war of words" (Ti2 2:23-24; Ti1 6:4) where the most vital matters are at stake (Ti2 2:17-18; Act 18:15). The oldest manuscripts put a stop at "charging them before the Lord" (which clause is thus connected with "put them in remembrance") and read the imperative, "Strive not thou in words," &c. to no profit--not qualifying "words"; but Greek neuter, in apposition with "strive in words," "(a thing tending) to no profit," literally, "profitable for nothing"; the opposite of "meet for the master's use" (Ti2 2:21). to the subverting--sure to subvert (overturn) the hearers: the opposite of "edifying" (building up) (Co2 13:10).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.