The interpretation timeline
Colossians 1:14 Douay-Rheims

In whom we have redemption through his blood, the remission of sins;

A.D. 202 – 1871 7 witnesses 8 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
202
A.D.
Irenaeus Patristic
c. A.D. 130–202
“And again, in his Epistle to the Galatians, he says: "But when the fulness of time had come, God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption;" plainly indicating one God, who did by the prophets make promise of the Son, and one Jesus Christ our Lord, who was of the seed of David according to His birth from Mary; and that Jesus Christ was appointed the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead, as being the first begotten in all the creation; the Son of God being made the Son of man, that through Him we may receive the adoption,-humanity sustaining, and receiving, and embracing the Son of God.”
Source
“But vain in every respect are they who despise the entire dispensation of God, and disallow the salvation of the flesh, and treat with contempt its regeneration, maintaining that it is not capable of incorruption. But if this indeed do not attain salvation, then neither did the Lord redeem us with His blood, nor is the cup of the Eucharist the communion of His blood, nor the bread which we break the communion of His body. For blood can only come from veins and flesh, and whatsoever else makes up the substance of man, such as the Word of God was actually made. By His own blood he redeemed us, as also His apostle declares, "In whom we have redemption through His blood, even the remission of sins." And as we are His members, we are also nourished by means of the creation (and He Himself grants the creation to us, for He causes His sun to rise, and sends rain when He wills). He has acknowledged the cup (which is a part of the creation) as His own blood, from which He bedews our blood; and the bread (also a part of the creation) He has established as His own body, from which He gives increase to our bodies.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“For He indeed translated us, but the Son furnished the cause. For what saith he? "Who delivered us out of the power of darkness." But the same is, "In whom we have the full redemption, even the forgiveness of sins." For had we not been forgiven our sins, we should not have been "translated." So here again the words, "In whom." And he said not "redemption," but "full redemption," so that we shall not fall any more, nor become liable to death. But if one ought to say anything more: the work of the Son is the greater. How? Because it were a thing impossible to give the kingdom to men whilst continuing in their sins; but thus it is an easier thing, so that He prepared the way for the gift. What sayest thou? He Himself loosed thee from thy sins: surely then He Himself also hath brought thee nigh; already he has laid by anticipation the foundation of his doctrine.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above he set forth the matter of the thanksgiving, showing for what goods he gave thanks; here he shows the prayer, indicating what he asks for them. And first he sets forth beforehand the conditions of prayer; second he adds the goods sought, at the place "that you may be filled." Prayer has three conditions. First, that it be timely; hence he adds "from the day," etc., supply: we began to pray. Jer. 31:20: "Since I have spoken of him, I will still remember him," etc. Second, that it be continuous, at "we do not cease," etc. 1 Kings 12:23: "But far be this sin from me before the Lord, that I should cease to pray for you." Rom. 1:9: "Without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers." Third, that it be manifold and perfect, at "praying and asking." Prayer is the ascent of the mind into God. Petition is the asking for things. Prayer ought to go before, so that one asking devoutly may be heard, just as those who petition put forward persuasion beforehand so as to incline the one petitioned; but we ought to put forward devotion and meditation on God and on divine things, not so that we may bend him, but so that we may raise ourselves up to him. Now he asks three things: namely, knowledge of the truth, at "that you may be filled"; the working of virtue, at "that you may walk"; the endurance of evils, at "in all patience." He desires, moreover, a threefold knowledge: namely, of things to be done; hence he says "that you may be filled with the knowledge," etc., that is, that you may fully know the will of God. 1 Thess. 4:3: "This is the will of God, your sanctification, that you abstain," etc. He therefore knows the will of God who lives in holiness. He therefore who sins does not know the will of God, because everyone who sins is ignorant. Rom. 12:2: "That you may prove what is the will of God," etc. Likewise, knowledge of divine things, at "in all wisdom," which is the knowledge of divine things, according to Augustine. Wis. 1:1: "Think of the Lord in goodness." Likewise of spiritual gifts, at "and spiritual understanding," that is, not of these bodily things. 1 Cor. 2:12: "But we have not received the spirit of this world, but the spirit that is of God." And these two, wisdom and understanding, are fittingly joined together, because wisdom is lesser if it lacks understanding, as Gregory says; and understanding is useless without wisdom, because wisdom judges and understanding grasps, and it is not able to grasp unless it judges, and conversely. The Gloss says that the first is taken generally; the second pertains to the active life; the third to the contemplative. Nor does it suffice to know, because "to him who knows the good and does not do it, it is sin for him," as it is said in James 4:17. Hence it is necessary that there be present a virtuous working, which he touches on first, at "that you may walk worthily of God." For he walks unworthily who does not live as befits a son of God. 2 Cor. 6:4: "In all things let us exhibit ourselves as ministers of God in much patience," etc. 1 Thess. 4:6: "As we have foretold and testified." Second he touches on right intention, at "pleasing in all things." Wis. 4:10: "Having become pleasing to God, he was made beloved." Third, zeal for advancing, at "in every good work," etc. For man ought always to strive toward a further good. Ecclus. 24:23: "My flowers are the fruit of honor and honesty." Rom. 6:22: "You have your fruit unto sanctification," etc. Upon fruit-bearing follows the increase of knowledge; therefore he says "and increasing," etc. For from the fact that someone strives to fulfill the commandments, he is disposed toward knowledge. Ps. 118:100: "I have understood more than the aged, because I have sought your commandments." Wis. 1:4: "It will not dwell in a body subject to sins." And he says "of God," not of the world. Wis. 10:10: "He gave him the knowledge of the saints," etc. Then he touches on the endurance of evils, because for virtue it does not suffice to know or to will, unless one acts unmovably, which cannot be without patience and the endurance of evils. And therefore he says "strengthened in all virtue." Ecclus. 47: "Rich in virtue, having a zeal for beauty." Which virtue is from God; hence he says "according to the power of his glory." Eph. 6:10: "Be strengthened in the Lord." But he adds "of his glory," that is, of Christ, who is the glory of the Father, because to proceed toward sin is to proceed toward darkness. Wis. 7:25: "For she is a vapor of the power of God, and a certain pure emanation of the glory of the almighty God." Then when he says "in all patience," etc., he asks for them endurance in adversities. For some fail either on account of the difficulty of adversities, and therefore it is necessary to have patience. Lk. 21:19: "In your patience you will possess your souls." Or on account of the delay of the reward, and therefore he says "and longsuffering," which makes one sustain the thing promised. Hab. 2:3: "If it makes a delay, wait for it," etc. Heb. 6:15: "Bearing patiently, he obtained the promise." But some avoid these two, yet with sadness. Against this he says "with joy." James 1:2: "Count it all joy, brothers, when you fall into various temptations," etc. Then when he says "giving thanks," etc., he gives thanks for the benefits shown to all the faithful. And this, first, for the benefit of grace, which he sets forth first; second, for the fruit of grace, at "who has delivered." He says therefore: we pray for you, giving thanks to God — namely as creator — and to the Father — namely as adopter — who worthy, etc. Some have said that the gifts of graces are given for merits, and that God gives grace to the worthy, but not to the unworthy; therefore the Apostle excludes this, because whatever worthiness and grace you have, God has made this in you: therefore the effect of grace as well. And therefore he says "who has made us worthy," etc. 2 Cor. 3:5: "Not that we are sufficient to think anything of ourselves, as of ourselves," etc. "Unto the part of the lot of the saints," etc. All men of the world are, according to nature, good; and therefore it is just that they have some part of God. The wicked, indeed, have as their part pleasures and temporal things. Wis. 2:9: "This is our part, and this our lot." The saints, however, have God himself as their part. Lam. 3:24: "The Lord is my part." Ps. 15:5: "The Lord is the part of my inheritance." And therefore he says "who worthy," etc. And he adds "of the lot," because a thing is divided in two ways: sometimes by choice, when one chooses this part, another that part; sometimes by lot. Prov. 18:18: "The lot suppresses contradictions." But this part falls to the saints not by their own choice. Jn. 15:16: "You did not choose me, but I chose you" — but because God himself has chosen you. For a lot is nothing other than to commit something to divine judgment. Now a lot is threefold: namely consultative, divinatory, and divisory. The first, in temporal matters, is not evil; the second is vain and evil; the third, in cases of necessity, is sometimes to be permitted. But this is of itself the possession of light. 1 Tim., last chapter: "He dwells in unapproachable light." Job 36:32: "In his hands he hides the light," etc. And from this part follows the effect of grace, namely the translation from darkness into light. And therefore he first sets forth the translation, second the manner in which men before grace are slaves of sin. For since sin is darkness, therefore they are in the power of darkness, whether of demons or of sins. Eph., last chapter: "against the rulers of the world of this darkness," etc. Isa. 49:25: "The captivity is taken away from the strong," etc. "And he has translated," etc., that is, that we might be the kingdom of God. Jn. 19: "My kingdom is not of this world," etc. And this happens when we are freed from sin. Apoc. 5:10: "You have made us a kingdom to our God," etc. Or, according to the letter, that we might obtain eternal life. Matt. 3:2: "The kingdom of heaven will draw near." And this is what he says: "the kingdom of the Son of his love." Love, as Augustine says in the Gloss, is sometimes said to be the Holy Spirit, who is the love of the Father and the Son. But if love were always to be taken thus personally, then the Son would be the son of the Holy Spirit; but sometimes it is said essentially, as it is said in the Gloss. "The Son of his love" is therefore said, that is, his beloved Son, or the son of his essence. But is this true: the Son is the son of the essence of the Father? It must be said that if the genitive designates the relation of an efficient cause, it is false, because essence does not generate, nor is it generated. But if it designates form, that is, one having his essence as it were materially — just as something is said to be "of outstanding form," that is, having an outstanding form — thus it is true. Jn. 3:35: "The Father loves the Son, and has given all things into his hand." Then when he says "in whom we have," etc., he shows the manner of the translation. For man existing in sin was held subject in two ways: namely through slavery. Jn. 8:34: "He who commits sin is the slave of sin." Also he was guilty of punishment, and turned away from God. Isa. 59:2: "Your iniquities have divided between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you, lest he hear." Christ removes these two things, because, insofar as he is man, he was made a sacrifice for us and redeemed us in his blood. And therefore he says "in whom we have redemption." 1 Cor. 6:20: "You are bought with a great price." But insofar as he is God, we have through him the remission of sins, because the guilt of sin was loosed through him.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“In whom we have redemption,.... Which is an excellent and wonderful blessing of grace saints have in and by Christ; and lies in a deliverance from sin, all sin, original and actual, under which they are held captive, in a state of nature, and by which they are made subject to the punishment of death; but through the sacrifice of Christ it is taken, and put away, finished, and made an end of; and they are freed from the damning power of it, or any obligation to punishment for it; and in consequence of this are delivered from the enslaving governing power of it by his grace and Spirit, and will hereafter be entirely rid of the very being of it: it consists also of a deliverance from the law, the curse and bondage of it, under which they are held on account of sin, the transgression of it; but being delivered from sin, they are also from the law, its accusations, charges, menaces, curses, and condemnation; as likewise out of the hands of Satan, by whom they are led captive; for through the ransom price paid by Christ they are ransomed out of the hands of him that was stronger than they, the prey is taken from the mighty, and the lawful captive delivered by him that has led captivity captive: in short, this redemption is a deliverance out of the hands of all their enemies, and from all evils and misery, the effects of sin, from death, and hell, and wrath to come. The author of it is Christ, the Son of God, the Son of his love, his dear Son: he was called to this work in the council of peace, in which the affair of redemption was consulted; and he agreed to undertake it in the covenant of grace, of which this is a principal article; and being in his constitution, as Mediator, every way fit and proper for it: as man, the right of redemption belonged to him, being the near kinsman of his people, and, as God, he was mighty and able to perform it; as man he had something to offer, and, as God, could make that sacrifice valuable and effectual to all saving purposes; as man, he had compassion on human nature, and, as God, was concerned for things pertaining to his honour and glory. And thus being every way qualified, he was sent, and came on this errand, and has obtained a redemption, which is precious, plenteous, complete and eternal: it is now with him, and "in him"; and he is made this, and everything else to his people, that they want. The subjects of this blessing are, not angels, but men; and not all men, but some that are redeemed from among men, out of every kindred, tongue, people, and nation; who are called by the name of Jacob, the people of Christ, a peculiar people, and the church of God; and evidentially are such, who have faith in Christ, love to the saints, and good hope of eternal life; who know the grace of God in truth, are made meet to be partakers of the eternal inheritance, being delivered from the power of darkness, and translated into the kingdom of Christ, and are designed by the we in this text: the means by which this blessing is procured, it through his blood. This phrase is left out indeed in the Syriac and Ethiopic versions, and in the Complutensian edition, and in some copies; but rightly stands here, as it does in Eph 1:7, where there is another clause added, which is here omitted, at the end of the verse, "according to the riches of his grace". This is the blood of Christ, his own blood, and not the blood of bulls and goats, and the same with that of the persons he redeems, but untainted with sin; the blood of Christ, as of a lamb without spot and blemish, of original or actual sin, otherwise it would not have been a sufficient redemption price for his people; nor even then, were it not as it was the blood of the Son of God, of one that was God as well as man, whereby it came to have a proper value and efficacy in it to obtain this blessing: Christ's shedding his blood freely on this account is a proof of his great love to his redeemed ones; the efficacy that was in it to answer this purpose shows the dignity and greatness of his person; and it not being to be effected without it, demonstrates the strictness of divine justice, and that the redemption of men is brought about in a way entirely consistent with the righteousness and holiness of God. A particular branch of this blessing follows, and which serves, in some sense, to illustrate and explain it, even the forgiveness of sins; of all sin, original and actual; of heart, lip, and life, secret and open, past, present, and to come; which lies in a non-imputation of sin, a remembrance of it no more, a removing of it entirely out of the way, a covering and blotting it out of sight, so as to be no more visible and legible: this is in Christ, where all spiritual blessings are; nor is it to be had or expected from an absolute God, but from God in Christ, and through him, through his propitiatory sacrifice; for as redemption, so forgiveness of sin is through his blood, which was shed for it; so that it proceeds upon the foot of satisfaction made to the justice of God by a price paid, and is an act of justice as well as grace, and belongs to the same persons as redemption does; hence those that are redeemed are represented as without fault before the throne; and indeed, the reason why their iniquities are blotted out, and will be remembered no more against them, is, because they are redeemed.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“In whom we have redemption - Who has paid down the redemption price, even his own blood, that our sins might be cancelled, and we made fit to be partakers of the inheritance among the saints in light. The clause, δια του αἱματος αυτου, Through his blood, is omitted by ABCDEFG, and by most others of weight and importance; by the Syriac, Arabic of Erpen, Coptic, Ethiopic, Sahidic, some copies of the Vulgate and by the Itala; and by most of the Greek fathers. Griesbach has left it out of the text. It is likely that the reading here is not genuine; yet that we have redemption any other way than through the sacrifice of Christ, the Scriptures declare not. The same phrase is used Eph 1:7, where there is no various reading in any of the MSS., versions, or fathers. The forgiveness of sins - Αφεσιν των ἁμαρτιων· The taking away of sins; all the power, guilt, and infection of sin. All sin of every kind, with all its influence and consequences.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“It is through the blood of Christ, and not by the law of Moses, that we are freed from the power of death. If the law could have saved us, the coming of Christ would have been useless. See then, he says, if it be proper to engage under a law which is so inefficacious. (Calmet) — From this verse and from ver. 12, et alibi passim, we are taught that we are not only by imputation made partakers of Christ’s benefits, but are by his grace made worthy thereof, and deserve our salvation condignly, ex condigno. (Bristow)”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“(Eph 1:7.) redemption--rather as Greek, "our redemption." through his blood--omitted in the oldest manuscripts; probably inserted from Eph 1:7. sins--Translate as Greek, "our sins." The more general term: for which Eph 1:7, Greek, has, "our transgressions," the more special term.”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.