The interpretation timeline
Colossians 2:14 Douay-Rheims

Blotting out the handwriting of the decree that was against us, which was contrary to us. And he hath taken the same out of the way, fastening it to the cross:

A.D. 202 – 1871 10 witnesses 13 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
202
A.D.
Irenaeus Patristic
c. A.D. 130–202
“Therefore, by remitting sins, He did indeed heal man, while He also manifested Himself who He was. For if no one can forgive sins but God alone, while the Lord remitted them and healed men, it is plain that He was Himself the Word of God made the Son of man, receiving from the Father the power of remission of sins; since He was man, and since He was God, in order that since as man He suffered for us, so as God He might have compassion on us, and forgive us our debts, in which we were made debtors to God our Creator. And therefore David said beforehand, "Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord has not imputed sin;" pointing out thus that remission of sins which follows upon His advent, by which "He has destroyed the handwriting" of our debt, and "fastened it to the cross;" so that as by means of a tree we were made debtors to God, [so also] by means of a tree we may obtain the remission of our debt.”
Source
“Those who have become acquainted with the secondary (i.e., under Christ) constitutions of the apostles, are aware that the Lord instituted a new oblation in the new covenant, according to [the declaration of] Malachi the prophet. For, "from the rising of the sun even to the setting my name has been glorified among the Gentiles, and in every place incense is offered to my name, and a pure sacrifice;" as John also declares in the Apocalypse: "The incense is the prayers of the saints." Then again, Paul exhorts us "to present our bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service." And again, "Let us offer the sacrifice of praise, that is, the fruit of the lips." Now those oblations are not according to the law, the handwriting of which the Lord took away from the midst by cancelling it; but they are according to the Spirit, for we must worship God "in spirit and in truth." And therefore the oblation of the Eucharist is not a carnal one, but a spiritual; and in this respect it is pure. For we make an oblation to God of the bread and the cup of blessing, giving Him thanks in that He has commanded the earth to bring forth these fruits for our nourishment. And then, when we have perfected the oblation, we invoke the Holy Spirit, that He may exhibit this sacrifice, both the bread the body of Christ, and the cup the blood of Christ, in order that the receivers of these antitypes may obtain remission of sins and life eternal. Those persons, then, who perform these oblations in remembrance of the Lord, do not fall in with Jewish views, but, performing the service after a spiritual manner, they shall be called sons of wisdom.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“But, to come now to Moses, why, I wonder, did he merely at the time when Joshua was battling against Amalek, pray sitting with hands expanded, when, in circumstances so critical, he ought rather, surely, to have commended his prayer by knees bended, and hands beating his breast, and a face prostrate on the ground; except it was that there, where the name of the Lord Jesus was the theme of speech-destined as He was to enter the lists one day singly against the devil-the figure of the cross was also necessary, (that figure) through which Jesus was to win the victory? Why, again, did the same Moses, after the prohibition of any "likeness of anything," set forth a brazen serpent, placed on a "tree," in a hanging posture, for a spectacle of healing to Israel, at the time when, after their idolatry, they were suffering extermination by serpents, except that in this case he was exhibiting the Lord's cross on which the "serpent" the devil was "made a show of," and, for every one hurt by such snakes-that is, his angels -on turning intently from the peccancy of sins to the sacraments of Christ's cross, salvation was outwrought? For he who then gazed upon that (cross) was freed from the bite of the serpents.”
Source
235
A.D.
Hippolytus of Rome Patristic
c. A.D. 170–235
“In order, then, to show the time when He is to come whom the blessed Daniel desired to see, he says, "And after seven weeks there are other threescore and two weeks," which period embraces the space of 434 years. For after the return of the people from Babylon under the leadership of Jesus the son of Josedech, and Ezra the scribe, and Zerubbabel the son of Salathiel, of the tribe of David, there were 434 years unto the coming of Christ, in order that the Priest of priests might be manifested in the world, and that He who taketh away the sins of the world might be evidently set forth, as John speaks concerning Him: "Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!" And in like manner Gabriel says: "To blot out transgressions, and make reconciliation for sins." But who has blotted out our transgressions? Paul the apostle teaches us, saying, "He is our peace who made both one; " and then, "Blotting out the handwriting of sins that was against us."”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“Seest thou how great His earnestness that the bond should be done away? To wit, we all were under sin and punishment. He Himself, through suffering punishment, did away with both the sin and the punishment, and He was punished on the Cross. To the Cross then He affixed it; as having power, He tore it asunder. What bond? He means either that which they said to Moses, namely, "All that God hath said will we do, and be obedient" (Ex. xxiv. 3), or, if not that, this, that we owe to God obedience; or if not this, he means that the devil held possession of it, the bond which God made for Adam, saying, "In the day thou eatest of the tree, thou shalt die." (Gen. ii. 17.) This bond then the devil held in his possession. And Christ did not give it to us, but Himself tore it in two, the action of one who remits joyfully. "In doctrines" [ordinances], he saith. What doctrines? The Faith. It is enough to believe. He hath not set works against works, but works against faith. And what next? Blotting out is an advance upon remission; again he saith, "And hath taken it out of the way." Nor yet even so did He preserve it, but rent it even in sunder, "by nailing it to His Cross."”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“This is the whole scheme of our salvation, by which the one who as God had made man himself became man, for the sake of finding lost man. This is the whole matter of Christ shedding for the forgiveness of our sins true, not false, blood, and with his blood, "obliterating the bond of our sins." All this these damnable heretics strive to drain of all meaning. All this, so the Manichaeans believe, as it appeared to human eyes, was spirit and not flesh.”
Source
“She [i.e., his mother, Monica] did not ask for such things but simply requested that remembrance be made for her at Thy altar, which she had attended without missing a single day. She knew that on it the Holy Victim is offered; by means of which "the decree against us, which was hostile to us" is canceled; by means of which the Enemy, adding up our offenses and seeking something to charge against us, and finding nothing in him in whom we conquer, was overcome. .”
Source
“With good reason do we celebrate the Passover wherein the blood of the Lord was poured out, by which we are cleansed of every offense. Let us be assured; the devil was holding the bond of slavery against us, but it was blotted out by the blood of Christ. .”

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“What has gone before fortified the faithful against the deceptions of worldly wisdom; here he instructs and fortifies them against heretics, who wish to draw them to the observances of the law. He first teaches them to avoid these men; secondly he excludes their false seduction, at the words no one , etc. Again, the first part is divided into two: first he shows that the observances of the law have been fulfilled in Christ; secondly he excludes them, showing that they are not bound to them, at the words no one you . Now among the legal observances, the first is circumcision, in which the Jews professed observance of the old law, just as we in Baptism profess observance of the new law. Gal. V, 3: I testify to every man circumcising himself, that he is a debtor to do the whole law . Hence he says that the faithful are circumcised with a certain spiritual circumcision. From this it follows that that ceases. Hence, first he shows with what circumcision they are circumcised; secondly, in what this circumcision is received, at the words buried together ; thirdly he assigns the reason for this circumcision, at the words and you, when you were dead . Concerning the first, it must be known that circumcision is twofold, namely carnal and spiritual. But through Christ we are circumcised, not with carnal circumcision, but with spiritual. And therefore he first excludes the carnal; secondly he establishes the spiritual. He says therefore: in whom , namely Christ, you were circumcised with a circumcision not made by hand . Rom. II, 28: For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly; nor is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh, but he is a Jew who is one in secret, and the circumcision is of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter , etc. In the despoiling of the body of the flesh . This can be read in two ways. In one way, thus: I say, circumcised, with a circumcision not made by hand — I say you, remaining, in the despoiling , etc., that is, of carnal corruption, according to that word of I Cor. XV, 50: flesh and blood shall not possess the kingdom of God , etc.; as if he were to say: you are circumcised for this reason, because you no longer have the vices of the flesh. Below, III, 9: stripping off from yourselves the old man with his deeds , etc. Or, I say, with a circumcision not made by hand — for that circumcision made by hand consists in the despoiling of the body of the flesh , which is cut off from the other. Hence another text has: the skin of the flesh , that is, of the body of the flesh, that is, a part of the body, which is flesh — not that the body is one thing and the flesh another. And he says of the flesh , alluding to the law, where mention is made of the flesh. Gen. XVII, 11: you shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin , etc. And this in order to show that it is a certain carnal observance. But we are not circumcised with such a circumcision, but with the circumcision of Christ. For just as Christ assumed the likeness of sinful flesh, that is, passible flesh, in order to free us from sin, so too the remedies of the law, in order to free us from observance of the law. Or which Christ works in us, which is spiritual circumcision, as is said in Rom. II, 29, not in the letter, but in the spirit . Secondly he shows that we have obtained it in Baptism, and thus Baptism is spiritual circumcision. And first he shows that in Baptism the figure of Christ's death is displayed; secondly that in it conformity to Christ's resurrection is received, at the words in whom also you rose again . He says therefore buried together , etc. Because in it the likeness of Christ's death is expressed, so that, just as Christ was placed first on the cross, and afterward in the tomb, so he who is baptized is placed under the water, and three times, just as Christ remained three days in the tomb. Buried together, that is, baptized in the likeness of Christ's death, so that just as in it he destroyed sin, so also in Baptism. And just as he rose from the tomb, so also do we rise from sins in reality, and from the corruption of the flesh in hope. And this through faith in the working of God , because he was raised up by the power of God. Ps. XL, 11: raise me up, and I will repay them , etc. And believing this resurrection, one becomes a partaker of this resurrection. Rom. VIII, 11: he who raised up Jesus Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies . But Christ also raised himself up. For the working of the Father and the Son is the same. Ps. CVII, 3: I will rise at dawn , etc. Then, when he says and you, when , etc., he shows the reason for the likeness; and first he shows the likeness; secondly the manner of what has been said, at the words blotting out , etc. The text is not difficult. I said you were circumcised, because you were buried together with Christ in Baptism. And he compared Baptism to burial and death. But it can be said that it would be more to the purpose if it were said that first it is shown that Baptism is circumcision; secondly he shows the reason why, namely, that sin is a superfluity, and the flesh of the foreskin is a superfluity. It is the same, therefore, to lay aside sin and the foreskin. But in Baptism sin is laid aside; therefore it is the same as circumcision. And therefore he says when you were dead in your sins , that is, on account of your sins. Ps. XXXIII, 22: the death of sinners is the worst. And in the foreskin of your flesh , that is, of carnal concupiscence, which pertains to original sin — as though bound by the guilt of evil deeds and of mortal sin. Doing this, Christ brought you to life together with him , etc. Eph. II, 1: when you were dead in your trespasses and sins , etc. And this by removing from you all sin, forgiving and remitting to you all your sins . It is the same, therefore, to be circumcised and to be brought to life together, and this in Baptism through the remedy of the death of sin, and when we are circumcised through the removal of original sin. But how did he forgive? I answer: It must be said that man, by sinning, incurs two things, namely the guilt of fault, and servitude to the Devil. And therefore he tells how sins are forgiven. First as to the removal of diabolical servitude; secondly he sets down the taking away of the guilt of fault, at the words despoiling , etc. He says therefore blotting out , etc. This decree can be understood in two ways. In one way, as the old law. Eph. II, 15: making void the law of commandments contained in decrees , etc. And thus he speaks here to the Jews; as if he were to say: and you he brought to life together with him. A handwriting is a document written by hand, and it is properly made as security for contracts. Whoever breaks the decree of God becomes guilty of fault. And this guilt consists both in the memory of man, thereby disturbed and stained, and in the memory of God who is to judge, and of the demons who are to torment. This, therefore, remaining in memory, is called the handwriting: Christ, then, is he who forgave all things, and this by blotting out the handwriting , that is, the memory of the transgression, which , the handwriting or the decree, was against us , because both were against us. The law indeed, because it produced the knowledge of sin, and did not help; the handwriting, however, because the memory of the transgression was for the sake of punishing. And he says of the decree , because he does not remit in such a way as to make it so that you did not sin, but because it is not in the memory of God for punishing, nor in the memory of the demon for accusing, nor in you for causing sorrow. Ps. XXXI, 1: blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered , etc. Or he speaks in common, not only to the Jews, but to all. One decree was made to the first man, Gen. II, 16: eat of every tree of Paradise, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil do not eat. In whatever day you eat of it, you shall die the death . But man transgressed a decree of this kind, and because of this there is in memory a handwriting contrary to us, which Christ blotted out. And how? On the cross , when he took it out of the way , etc. For it was the custom that, when one paid all that to which he was bound, the handwriting was torn up. But man was in sin; Christ, however, paid for good things by suffering. Ps. LXVIII, 5: what I did not steal, then I paid . And therefore, together with the death of Christ, this handwriting was destroyed; and therefore he says he took it out of the way , that is, he removed it from the nature of things, and this by fastening it to the cross , through which, making satisfaction to God, he took away our sin. Then, when he says despoiling , etc., he shows how he freed us from servitude to sin. For granted that a usurer, on account of a security, holds a man captive, the destruction of the security would not suffice, unless he were freed. So too Christ. And therefore he says despoiling , etc. This despoiling refers to the saints who died before the Passion of Christ, and thus Christ freed them by despoiling hell of them. Zach. IX, 11: you also, by the blood of your covenant, have sent forth your prisoners out of the pit, in which there was no water . Is. XLIX, 25: indeed even the captivity shall be taken away from the strong man, and what has been taken from the mighty one shall be saved . But if it is understood of the living, thus he despoiled them, namely, of the demons. Lc. XI, 22: but if a stronger one coming upon him overcomes him, he will take away all his armor in which he trusted, and will distribute his spoils . Io. XII, 31: the prince of this world shall be cast out . He says therefore despoiling the principalities and powers , that is, the demons themselves. Eph. ult.: against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness , etc. He led forth those saints confidently, as one having authority: into heaven, as regards the dead; and as regards the living, into the kingdom of his glory or of his grace. Or he led forth , that is, led outside, that is, he expelled the principalities from man. Is. LI, 9: put on strength, O arm of the Lord , etc. Openly , that is, by evident judgment, by which it may be known that they were led forth. For formerly the whole world served idols; now it does not. Or openly , that is, in the presence of a multitude of angels, both because he descended to the hell of the saints, and because he ascended into heaven. And this triumphing in himself , that is, in his own power. Phil. III, 21: according to the working by which he is able even to subject all things to himself . Another text has it thus: and stripping himself of the flesh, he made a show of the principalities and powers, triumphing confidently . And it is explained thus: stripping himself of the flesh , that is, of mortality. I Cor. XV, v. 50: flesh and blood shall not possess the kingdom of God , that is, the mortality of carnal corruption. Rom. VI, 9: Christ rising from the dead dies now no more; death shall no longer have dominion over him . II Cor. V, 16: and if we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know him no longer. He made a show , that is, he offered in himself an example, of how they are to be conquered. The rest is not changed.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances,.... Various are the senses interpreters give of these words; some think by the handwriting is meant the covenant God made with Adam, Gen 2:17, which being broken, obliged him and all his posterity to the penalty of death, but is cancelled and abolished by Christ; others, the agreement which the Israelites made with God at Mount Sinai, when they said, "all that the Lord hath said will we do, and be obedient", Exo 24:7; which was as it were setting their hands, and laying themselves under obligation to obedience, and, in case of failure, to the penalty of the law; others, God's book of remembrance of the sins of men, out of which they are blotted when pardoned; others, the book of conscience, which bears witness to every debt, to every violation and transgression of the law, which may be said to be blotted out, when pacified with an application of the blood and righteousness of Christ; rather with others it signifies the ceremonial law, which lay in divers ordinances and commands, and is what, the apostle afterwards speaks of more clearly and particularly; and may be called so, because submission to it was an acknowledgment both of the faith and guilt of sin; every washing was saying, that a man was polluted and unclean; and every sacrifice was signing a man's own guilt and condemnation, and testifying that he deserved to die as the creature did, which was offered in sacrifice: or rather the whole law of Moses is intended, which was the handwriting of God, and obliged to obedience to it, and to punishment in case of disobedience; and this the Jews (z) call , "the writing of the debt", and is the very phrase the Syriac version uses here: now this was as a debt book, which showed and testified the debts of men; that is, their sins, how many they are guilty of, and what punishment is due unto them: and may well be said to be that that was against us, which was contrary to us; its nature being holy, just, good, and spiritual, is contrary to the unholy and carnal heart of man, and its commands disagreeable to his mind and will; nor can he perform what it requires; nor can he be subject to it without the grace of God, any more than he can like its precepts; and besides, it is contrary to him, and against him, as it charges him with debts, and proves them upon him, so that he has nothing to say in his defence; yea, it proceeds against him, and curses and condemns, and kills him: but God has "blotted" it out, Christ having engaged as a surety for his people, to pay off all their debts; and this being done by him, God has crossed the debt book of the law, has blotted it out, so that this book is of no force; it does not stand against these persons, it cannot show or prove any standing debt, it cannot demand any, or inflict any penalty: nay, he has took it out of the way; it is not to be seen or looked into as a debt book; it is abolished and done away; it is no more as administered by Moses, as a covenant of works, or as to its rigorous exaction, curse, and condemnation; this is true of the whole law of Moses, as well as of the ceremonial, which is utterly abolished and disannulled in every sense, because of the weakness and unprofitableness of it: nailing it to his cross: to the cross of Christ, showing that the abolition of it is owing to the cross of Christ; where and when he bore the curse and penalty of the law for his people, as well as answered all the types and shadows of it: it is thought to be an allusion to a custom in some countries, to cancel bonds, or antiquate edicts and decrees, by driving a nail through them, so that they could not be legible any more: or it may be to the writing of Pilate, which contained the charge and accusation against Christ; and which was placed over his head upon the cross, and fastened to it with nails (a); every nail in the cross made a scissure in this handwriting, or bond of the law, that lay against us, whereby it was so rent and torn, as to be of no force: thus the Holy Ghost makes use of various expressions, to show that there is nothing in the law standing against the saints; it is blotted out, and cannot be read; it is took away, and cannot be seen; it is nailed to the cross of Christ, and is torn to pieces thereby, that nothing can ever be produced from it to their hurt and condemnation, (z) Tzeror Hammor, fol. 87. 1, 3. (a) Nonnus in Joh. xix. 19. Vid. Niccqueti Titulus S. Crucis, l. 1. c. 18. p. 128.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Blotting out the hand-writing of ordinances - By the hand-writing of ordinances the apostle most evidently means the ceremonial law: this was against them, for they were bound to fulfill it; and it was contrary to them, as condemning them for their neglect and transgression of it. This law God himself has blotted out. Blotting out the hand-writing is probably an allusion to Num 5:23, where the curses written in the book, in the case of the woman suspected of adultery, are directed to be blotted out with the bitter waters. And there can be little doubt of a farther allusion, viz., to the custom of discharging the writing from parchment by the application of such a fluid as the muriatic acid, which immediately dissolves those ferruginous calces which constitute the blackening principle of most inks. But the East India inks, being formed only of simple black, such as burnt ivory, or cork, and gum water, may be wiped clean off from the surface of the paper or parchment by the application of a wet sponge, so as to leave not one legible vestige remaining: this I have often proved. Nailing it to his cross - When Christ was nailed to the cross, our obligation to fulfill these ordinances was done away. There may be another reference here to some ancient mode of annulling legal obligations, by nailing them to a post; but I do not recollect at present an instance or example. Antiquated laws are said to have been thus abrogated.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Blotting out, &c.[4] This is commonly expounded of the sentence of eternal death pronounced against sinful Adam, and all his posterity, for having sinned in him. Others would have it to signify only the yoke and obligations of the Mosaical law, which could not of itself remit sins, and occasionally made persons greater sinners. This sentence of death (whether we understand the one or the other) Christ took away, fastening it as it were, to the cross, taking it away by his death on the cross. (Witham)”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“Blotting out--Greek, "Having wiped out"; coincident in time with "having forgiven you" (Col 2:13); hereby having cancelled the law's indictment against you. The law (including especially the moral law, wherein lay the chief difficulty in obeying) is abrogated to the believer, as far as it was a compulsory, accusing code, and as far as "righteousness" (justification) and "life" were sought for by it. It can only produce outward works, not inward obedience of the will, which in the believer flows from the Holy Spirit in Him (Rom 3:21; Rom 7:2, Rom 7:4; Gal 2:19). the handwriting of ordinances--rather, "IN ordinances" (see on Eph 2:15); "the law of commandments contained in ordinances." "The handwriting" (alluding to the Decalogue, the representative of the law, written by the hand of God) is the whole law, the obligatory bond, under which all lay; the Jews primarily were under the bond, but they in this respect were the representative people of the world (Rom 3:19); and in their inability to keep the law was involved the inability of the Gentiles also, in whose hearts "the work of the law was written" (Rom 2:15); and as they did not keep this, they were condemned by it. that was against us . . . contrary to us--Greek "adversary to us"; so it is translated, Heb 10:27. "Not only was the law against us by its demands, but also an adversary to us by its accusations" [BENGEL]. TITTMANN explains the Greek, "having a latent contrariety to us"; not open designed hostility, but virtual unintentional opposition through our frailty; not through any opposition in the law itself to our good (Rom 7:7-12, Rom 7:14; Co1 15:56; Gal 3:21; Heb 10:3). The "WRITING" is part of "that which was contrary to us"; for "the letter killeth" (see on Co2 3:6). and took it--Greek, and hath taken it out of the way" (so as to be no longer a hindrance to us), by "nailing it to the cross." Christ, by bearing the curse of the broken law, has redeemed us from its curse (Gal 3:13). In His person nailed to the cross, the law itself was nailed to it. One ancient mode of cancelling bonds was by striking a nail through the writing: this seems at that time to have existed in Asia [GROTIUS]. The bond cancelled in the present case was the obligation lying against the Jews as representatives of the world, and attested by their amen, to keep the whole law under penalty of the curse (Deu 27:26; Neh 10:29).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.