Aristarchus, my fellow prisoner, saluteth you, and Mark, the cousin german of Barnabus, touching whom you have received commandments; if he come unto you, receive him:

“Nothing can surpass this praise. This is he that was brought up from Jerusalem with him. This man hath said a greater thing than the prophets; for they call themselves "strangers and foreigners," but this one calleth himself even a prisoner. Just like a prisoner of war he was dragged up and down, and lay at every one's will to suffer evil of them, yea rather worse even than prisoners. For those indeed their enemies, after taking them, treat with much attention, having a care for them as their own property: but Paul, as though an enemy and a foe, all men dragged up and down, beating him, scourging, insulting, and maligning. This was a consolation to those also (to whom he wrote), when their master even is in such circumstances. "And Mark, the cousin of Barnabas"; even this man he hath praised still from his relationship, for Barnabas was a great man; "touching whom ye received commandments; if he come unto you, receive him." Why? would they not have received him? Yes, but he means, with much attention; and this shows the man to be great. Whence they received these commandments, he does not say. "And Mark," he saith, "the cousin of Barnabas, touching whom ye received commandments, receive him." Perhaps they had received commandments from Barnabas.”

“Above he set down special teachings for each state of man; here he sets down what pertains to all, yet with respect to different persons. And first he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward others; second, how others ought to conduct themselves toward them, at the place *what concerns me*, etc. Again, the first part is divided into two: first he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward the apostle himself, their prelate; second, how toward others, especially unbelievers, at the place *in wisdom*. Concerning the first he does two things: first he urges them universally to pray; second, that they pray for him, at the place *praying*. Now prayer ought to have three qualities, namely that it be assiduous, grateful, and watchful. Assiduous — hence he says *being persistent in prayer*, that is, pray with perseverance. 1 Thess. 5:17: *pray without ceasing*, etc. Lk. 18:1: *it is necessary always to pray, and never to lose heart*. Likewise watchful, so that the mind not be weighed down; therefore it is added *watching*. 1 Pet. 4:7: *watch in prayers*, etc. Lk. 6:12: *he spent the night in prayer*, etc. Likewise grateful, that is, in thanksgiving — otherwise one does not merit new benefits, if one were ungrateful for those already received; hence there follows *in thanksgiving*. Phil. 4:6: *with thanksgiving*. 1 Thess. 5:18: *in all things give thanks*. Consequently he asks that they pray for him, saying *praying*, etc., because it is a debt that subjects pray for their prelates, since prelates guard them, and their good is the common good of all. 2 Thess. 3:1: *pray for us, that the word of the Lord may run*, etc. And this, that God may *open a door*, that is, the mouth, through which speech goes forth from the heart, and that God may give the grace of worthily uttering his word. In an opening, moreover, something great is signified. Matt. 5:2: *opening his mouth he taught them*, etc. And therefore he adds *to speak*. 1 Cor. 12:2: *it is the spirit that speaks mysteries*. And these I need, because on account of the word of Christ I suffer tribulations. Therefore it is to be prayed that I may be able to do so freely. 2 Tim. 2:9: *I labor even unto chains*. And in this manner, that he may *make it manifest*, that is, that he may disclose it, etc. There can be three impediments to the word: namely, either on account of fear, and therefore he says *in chains*; or on account of its loftiness, such that the hearers might not be able to understand it, and therefore he says *that I may make it manifest*; or on account of an unfitness of time or manner, and therefore he says *as I ought*. 1 Cor. 3:1: *I could not speak to you as to spiritual men*, etc. Lk. 12:42: *a faithful and prudent steward, whom*, etc. Consequently, when he says *in wisdom*, etc., he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward outsiders, and first in conduct; second how in speech, at the place *your speech*. He says therefore *walk in wisdom* toward *those who are outside*, that is, unbelievers; *in wisdom*, that is, wisely. Wis. 7:28: *God loves no one except him who dwells with wisdom*, etc. And the reason for this is *redeeming*, etc. One redeems his own vexation when he gives up what is his by right, in order to avoid it. These men were being vexed by them; therefore he wants them to redeem it through wisdom. 1 Pet. 2:12: *having your conduct good among the Gentiles*, etc. Likewise he teaches, second, how they ought to conduct themselves in speaking. And first, that their speech be gracious; hence he says *let your speech always be in grace*. Ecclus. 6:5: *a gracious tongue abounds in a good man*. Second, that it be discreet; hence he says *seasoned with salt*. By salt is understood discretion: for through it every food that is seasoned is made savory, so every action without discretion is unsavory and disordered. Matt. 9: *have salt in yourselves, and have peace among yourselves*. And this *that you may know*, etc.: for one must answer the wise in one way, the foolish in another. Prov. ch. 26:4: *answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you become like him*, etc. 1 Pet. 3:15: *always ready to give satisfaction to everyone who asks you a reason*, etc. Then, when he says *what concerns me*, etc., he shows what others do toward them; and first he shows what those whom he sends to them do toward them; second, what those remaining with the apostle do, at the place *greets*. Now he sends to them a delegate, whom he first describes in three ways: first from love, calling him *most beloved brother*, namely through charity, which makes a man more precious than gold. Is. 13:12: *a man shall be more precious than gold, and a human being more than refined gold*, etc. Likewise from faith, hence he says *faithful in ministry*. 1 Cor. 4:2: *here now it is required among stewards that one be found faithful*. Likewise from humility, hence he says *and fellow servant*, namely in the carrying out of the ministry; but *in the Lord*, because a prelate ought to seek the advantage of those over whom he is set, and the honor of God. But for what purpose is he sent? That he may know the state of his subjects. Gen. 37:14: *go and see whether all things are well with your brothers and the flocks, and bring me word again of what is being done*, etc. 1 Kings ch. 17:18: *you shall visit your brothers to see whether they are doing well, and learn with whom they are placed*. Likewise that he may console. Rom. 1:11: *for I desire to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace to strengthen you*, that is, to be consoled together with you, etc. And the Lord, sent by the Father, came for this purpose. Is. 61:2: *that I might console all who mourn*, etc. Likewise he describes his companionship with Onesimus, *who all the things that are done here*, etc. And your affairs to me, that I may correct them, and mine to you, that you may have an example. Then, when he says *greets*, etc., he shows how they are greeted by those remaining with the apostle, and the text is sufficiently clear. *Concerning whom you have received*, etc. Acts 13:5 it is said that when Paul and Barnabas were traveling together, a certain John Mark joined himself to them in such a way that afterward he departed and later returned again. And Paul indeed was unwilling to receive him, but Barnabas was willing. And therefore Paul withdrew from Barnabas. And on account of this the apostle wrote to the Colossians concerning Mark, that they should not receive him; but now, because he had turned back, he writes that they should receive him: and this is *you have received*, etc. Or, the brother of Barnabas, concerning whom you have received from Barnabas, etc. And *Jesus who is called Justus*, who indeed was a man of holy conduct, and therefore is called Justus. *Who are of the circumcision*, sent to preach the Gospel of Christ. Phil. 1:18: *For what does it matter? Provided that in every way, whether by occasion or by truth, Christ is proclaimed*. And thus he sets down first the Gentiles, second the Jews. *Epaphras, who is from among you*, etc., because he was an Asian. And to this end they greet you, *that you may stand perfect*. Jas. 1:4: *that you may be perfect also*, etc. *Full*, etc., that is, in all things which pertain to the will of God. Likewise he mentions Luke, who was not born of the Jews, as it seems, because he was an Antiochene, a physician by trade, whom he names specially, because he was a man of good authority in the Church on account of the Gospel which he wrote while the apostle was still living. Then he says *greet*, etc., he shows whom they should greet, and first how others of another church; second how those who are of their own, at the place *and that which is of the Laodiceans* — from which it is gathered that he wrote other epistles, namely this one which is mentioned here, that is, to the Laodiceans, and another one to the Corinthians, besides the first and the second: for in the first epistle, ch. 5, he says: *I wrote to you in an epistle, that you should not associate with fornicators*, etc. But there is a twofold reason why they are not in the canon: because their authority was not established, since perhaps they had been corrupted, and had perished in the churches. Or because they contained nothing other than what these do. And *say to Archippus* — this man was their prelate, and he instructs that they admonish him, saying: *see*, etc. 2 Tim. 4:5: *fulfill your ministry*. And indeed he then fulfills his ministry when he does that for which he received it. But it seems that it does not pertain to a subject to admonish a prelate, Ex. 19:24. It must be said that to argue and reproach irreverently is forbidden, but to admonish charitably is permitted, as Paul did Peter, Gal. 2:11. But why did he not write to the prelate? Because the prelate exists for the sake of the Church, and not the reverse. *The salutation*, etc. It was the apostle's custom to have someone else write the whole epistle, but at the end he would put something in his own hand — 2 Thess., last chapter, where he says: *the salutation is by my own hand, Paul's* — the same also here, lest they be deceived. And he says *be mindful*, etc., because he was in chains at Rome: for Jas. 5:10: *take as an example, brothers, the outcome of hardship and of long-suffering and of labor and of patience, the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord*, etc. Heb., last chapter: *remember your leaders who have spoken to you the word of God, and considering the outcome of their conduct, imitate their faith*. Finally, concluding, he wishes them good, saying *grace*, etc. Jn. 1:17: *grace and truth came through Jesus Christ*: to whom be praise and glory, now and forever. Amen.”

“Aristarchus my fellow prisoner saluteth you,.... This man was a man of Macedonia, and a Thessalonian; Act 19:29 which hinders not but that he might be of the circumcision, or a Jew, as is suggested in the following verse; for he might be born at Thessalonica, and yet be of Jewish parents; nor is his Greek name any objection to it, for the Jews themselves say, that the greatest part of the Israelites that were out of the land, their names are as the names of strangers (l): he was a constant companion of the apostle, and one of his fellow labourers, as in Plm 1:24 and now a prisoner with him at Rome; and who having some knowledge of the members of the church at Colosse, takes this opportunity of sending his Christian salutation to them: and Marcus, sister's son to Barnabas; the same with John Mark, whose mother's name was Mary, said here to be sister to Barnabas, Act 12:12 concerning whom there was a difference between Paul and Barnabas, Act 15:37, and is the same Mark that wrote the Gospel, and was converted by the Apostle Peter, Pe1 5:13 and who is said to have received his Gospel from him; he is also mentioned Ti2 4:11 . The Arabic version calls him here, the "brother's son of Barnabas": and the Syriac version, , "his uncle's son": however, Barnabas being so great a man as he was, and so well known, it added some credit to Mark, that he was a relation of his: touching whom ye received commandments; not concerning Barnabas, but Mark, concerning whom they had had letters of commendation, either from Barnabas or from Paul, to this purpose: if he come unto you, receive him; for this was either the substance of those letters, or what the apostle now adds of his own, for the further confirmation of them; and that they might more readily and honourably receive him, when he should come unto them. (l) T. Bab. Gittin, fol. 11. 2.”

“Aristarchus my fellow prisoner - Concerning Aristarchus, see Act 19:29; Act 20:4; Act 27:2; and see the note on Act 27:2. Aristarchus and Epaphras are mentioned as saluters in this epistle, and in that to Philemon written at the same time; but here he is said to be a prisoner, and Epaphras not. In that to Philemon, Epaphras is called a prisoner, and Aristarchus not. One of them is wrong, though it is uncertain which; unless both were prisoners. See Wall's Crit. Notes. As Aristarchus had been a zealous and affectionate adherent to St. Paul, and followed him in all his journeys, ministering to him in prison, and assisting him in preaching the Gospel in Rome, he might have been imprisoned on this account. We need not suppose that both he and Epaphras were imprisoned at the same time; about the same time they might be imprisoned, but it might be so ordered by the providence of God that when Aristarchus was imprisoned Epaphras was at liberty, and while Epaphras was in prison Aristarchus was at liberty. This is a very possible and easily to be conceived case. Marcus - See the account of this person, Act 15:39. Though there had been some difference between the apostle and this Mark, yet from this, and Ti2 4:11, we find that they were fully reconciled, and that Mark was very useful to St. Paul in the work of the ministry. Touching whom ye received commandments - What these were we cannot tell; it was some private communication which had been previously sent to the Colossian Church.”

“Aristarchus--a Macedonian of Thessalonica (Act 27:2), who was dragged into the theater at Ephesus, during the tumult with Gaius, they being "Paul's companions in travel." He accompanied Paul to Asia (Act 20:4), and subsequently (Act 27:2) to Rome. He was now at Rome with Paul (compare Plm 1:23-24). As he is here spoken of as Paul's "fellow prisoner," but in Plm 1:24 as Paul's "fellow laborer"; and vice versa, Epaphras in Plm 1:23, as his "fellow prisoner," but here (Col 1:7) "fellow servant," MEYER in ALFORD, conjectures that Paul's friends voluntarily shared his imprisonment by turns, Aristarchus being his fellow prisoner when he wrote to the Colossians, Epaphras when he wrote to Philemon. The Greek for "fellow prisoner" is literally, fellow captive, an image from prisoners taken in warfare, Christians being "fellow soldiers" (Phi 2:25; Plm 1:2), whose warfare is "the good fight of faith." Mark--John Mark (Act 12:12, Act 12:25); the Evangelist according to tradition. sister's son--rather, "cousin," or "kinsman to Barnabas"; the latter being the better known is introduced to designate Mark. The relationship naturally accounts for Barnabas' selection of Mark as his companion when otherwise qualified; and also for Mark's mother's house at Jerusalem being the place of resort of Christians there (Act 12:12). The family belonged to Cyprus (Act 4:36); this accounts for Barnabas' choice of Cyprus as the first station on their journey (Act 13:4), and for Mark's accompanying them readily so far, it being the country of his family; and for Paul's rejecting him at the second journey for not having gone further than Perga, in Pamphylia, but having gone thence home to his mother at Jerusalem (Mat 10:37) on the first journey (Act 13:13). touching whom--namely, Mark. ye received commandments--possibly before the writing of this Epistle; or the "commandments" were verbal by Tychicus, and accompanying this letter, since the past tense was used by the ancients (where we use the present) in relation to the time which it would be when the letter was read by the Colossians. Thus (Plm 1:19), "I have written," for "I write." The substance of them was, "If he come unto you, receive him." Paul's rejection of him on his second missionary journey, because he had turned back at Perga on the first journey (Act 13:13; Act 15:37-39), had caused an alienation between himself and Barnabas. Christian love soon healed the breach; for here he implies his restored confidence in Mark, makes honorable allusion to Barnabas, and desires that those at Colosse who had regarded Mark in consequence of that past error with suspicion, should now "receive" him with kindness. Colosse is only about one hundred ten miles from Perga, and less than twenty from the confines of Pisidia, through which province Paul and Barnabas preached on their return during the same journey. Hence, though Paul had not personally visited the Colossian Church, they knew of the past unfaithfulness of Mark; and needed this recommendation of him, after the temporary cloud on him, so as to receive him, now that he was about to visit them as an evangelist. Again, in Paul's last imprisonment, he, for the last time, speaks of Mark (Ti2 4:11).”