The interpretation timeline
Colossians 4:17 Douay-Rheims

And say to Archippus: Take heed to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord, that thou fulfill it.

A.D. 407 – 1871 6 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"And say to Archippus, Take heed to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord, that thou fulfill it." Wherefore doth he not write to him? Perhaps he needed it not, but only a bare reminding, so as to be more diligent. "And say to Archippus, Take heed to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord." His chief aim is to subject them to him entirely. For they could no more have complaint against him for rebuking them, when they themselves had taken it all upon them; for it is not reasonable to talk to the disciples about the teacher. But to stop their mouths, he writes thus to them; "Say to Archippus," he saith, "Take heed." This word is everywhere used to alarm; as when he saith, "Take heed of dogs." (Phil. iii. 2.) "Take heed lest there shall be any one that maketh spoil of you." (Col. ii. 8) "Take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to the weak." (1 Cor. viii. 9) And he always so expresses himself when he would terrify. "Take heed," he saith, "to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord, that thou fulfill it." He doth not even allow him the power of choosing, as he saith himself, "For if I do this of mine own will, I have a reward: but if not of mine own will, I have a stewardship entrusted to me." (1 Cor. ix. 17) "That thou fulfill it," continually using diligence. "Which thou hast received in the Lord, that thou fulfill it." Again, the word "in" means "through the Lord." He gave it thee, says he, not we. He subjects them also to him, when he shows that they had been committed to his hands by God.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above he set down special teachings for each state of man; here he sets down what pertains to all, yet with respect to different persons. And first he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward others; second, how others ought to conduct themselves toward them, at the place *what concerns me*, etc. Again, the first part is divided into two: first he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward the apostle himself, their prelate; second, how toward others, especially unbelievers, at the place *in wisdom*. Concerning the first he does two things: first he urges them universally to pray; second, that they pray for him, at the place *praying*. Now prayer ought to have three qualities, namely that it be assiduous, grateful, and watchful. Assiduous — hence he says *being persistent in prayer*, that is, pray with perseverance. 1 Thess. 5:17: *pray without ceasing*, etc. Lk. 18:1: *it is necessary always to pray, and never to lose heart*. Likewise watchful, so that the mind not be weighed down; therefore it is added *watching*. 1 Pet. 4:7: *watch in prayers*, etc. Lk. 6:12: *he spent the night in prayer*, etc. Likewise grateful, that is, in thanksgiving — otherwise one does not merit new benefits, if one were ungrateful for those already received; hence there follows *in thanksgiving*. Phil. 4:6: *with thanksgiving*. 1 Thess. 5:18: *in all things give thanks*. Consequently he asks that they pray for him, saying *praying*, etc., because it is a debt that subjects pray for their prelates, since prelates guard them, and their good is the common good of all. 2 Thess. 3:1: *pray for us, that the word of the Lord may run*, etc. And this, that God may *open a door*, that is, the mouth, through which speech goes forth from the heart, and that God may give the grace of worthily uttering his word. In an opening, moreover, something great is signified. Matt. 5:2: *opening his mouth he taught them*, etc. And therefore he adds *to speak*. 1 Cor. 12:2: *it is the spirit that speaks mysteries*. And these I need, because on account of the word of Christ I suffer tribulations. Therefore it is to be prayed that I may be able to do so freely. 2 Tim. 2:9: *I labor even unto chains*. And in this manner, that he may *make it manifest*, that is, that he may disclose it, etc. There can be three impediments to the word: namely, either on account of fear, and therefore he says *in chains*; or on account of its loftiness, such that the hearers might not be able to understand it, and therefore he says *that I may make it manifest*; or on account of an unfitness of time or manner, and therefore he says *as I ought*. 1 Cor. 3:1: *I could not speak to you as to spiritual men*, etc. Lk. 12:42: *a faithful and prudent steward, whom*, etc. Consequently, when he says *in wisdom*, etc., he shows how they ought to conduct themselves toward outsiders, and first in conduct; second how in speech, at the place *your speech*. He says therefore *walk in wisdom* toward *those who are outside*, that is, unbelievers; *in wisdom*, that is, wisely. Wis. 7:28: *God loves no one except him who dwells with wisdom*, etc. And the reason for this is *redeeming*, etc. One redeems his own vexation when he gives up what is his by right, in order to avoid it. These men were being vexed by them; therefore he wants them to redeem it through wisdom. 1 Pet. 2:12: *having your conduct good among the Gentiles*, etc. Likewise he teaches, second, how they ought to conduct themselves in speaking. And first, that their speech be gracious; hence he says *let your speech always be in grace*. Ecclus. 6:5: *a gracious tongue abounds in a good man*. Second, that it be discreet; hence he says *seasoned with salt*. By salt is understood discretion: for through it every food that is seasoned is made savory, so every action without discretion is unsavory and disordered. Matt. 9: *have salt in yourselves, and have peace among yourselves*. And this *that you may know*, etc.: for one must answer the wise in one way, the foolish in another. Prov. ch. 26:4: *answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you become like him*, etc. 1 Pet. 3:15: *always ready to give satisfaction to everyone who asks you a reason*, etc. Then, when he says *what concerns me*, etc., he shows what others do toward them; and first he shows what those whom he sends to them do toward them; second, what those remaining with the apostle do, at the place *greets*. Now he sends to them a delegate, whom he first describes in three ways: first from love, calling him *most beloved brother*, namely through charity, which makes a man more precious than gold. Is. 13:12: *a man shall be more precious than gold, and a human being more than refined gold*, etc. Likewise from faith, hence he says *faithful in ministry*. 1 Cor. 4:2: *here now it is required among stewards that one be found faithful*. Likewise from humility, hence he says *and fellow servant*, namely in the carrying out of the ministry; but *in the Lord*, because a prelate ought to seek the advantage of those over whom he is set, and the honor of God. But for what purpose is he sent? That he may know the state of his subjects. Gen. 37:14: *go and see whether all things are well with your brothers and the flocks, and bring me word again of what is being done*, etc. 1 Kings ch. 17:18: *you shall visit your brothers to see whether they are doing well, and learn with whom they are placed*. Likewise that he may console. Rom. 1:11: *for I desire to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace to strengthen you*, that is, to be consoled together with you, etc. And the Lord, sent by the Father, came for this purpose. Is. 61:2: *that I might console all who mourn*, etc. Likewise he describes his companionship with Onesimus, *who all the things that are done here*, etc. And your affairs to me, that I may correct them, and mine to you, that you may have an example. Then, when he says *greets*, etc., he shows how they are greeted by those remaining with the apostle, and the text is sufficiently clear. *Concerning whom you have received*, etc. Acts 13:5 it is said that when Paul and Barnabas were traveling together, a certain John Mark joined himself to them in such a way that afterward he departed and later returned again. And Paul indeed was unwilling to receive him, but Barnabas was willing. And therefore Paul withdrew from Barnabas. And on account of this the apostle wrote to the Colossians concerning Mark, that they should not receive him; but now, because he had turned back, he writes that they should receive him: and this is *you have received*, etc. Or, the brother of Barnabas, concerning whom you have received from Barnabas, etc. And *Jesus who is called Justus*, who indeed was a man of holy conduct, and therefore is called Justus. *Who are of the circumcision*, sent to preach the Gospel of Christ. Phil. 1:18: *For what does it matter? Provided that in every way, whether by occasion or by truth, Christ is proclaimed*. And thus he sets down first the Gentiles, second the Jews. *Epaphras, who is from among you*, etc., because he was an Asian. And to this end they greet you, *that you may stand perfect*. Jas. 1:4: *that you may be perfect also*, etc. *Full*, etc., that is, in all things which pertain to the will of God. Likewise he mentions Luke, who was not born of the Jews, as it seems, because he was an Antiochene, a physician by trade, whom he names specially, because he was a man of good authority in the Church on account of the Gospel which he wrote while the apostle was still living. Then he says *greet*, etc., he shows whom they should greet, and first how others of another church; second how those who are of their own, at the place *and that which is of the Laodiceans* — from which it is gathered that he wrote other epistles, namely this one which is mentioned here, that is, to the Laodiceans, and another one to the Corinthians, besides the first and the second: for in the first epistle, ch. 5, he says: *I wrote to you in an epistle, that you should not associate with fornicators*, etc. But there is a twofold reason why they are not in the canon: because their authority was not established, since perhaps they had been corrupted, and had perished in the churches. Or because they contained nothing other than what these do. And *say to Archippus* — this man was their prelate, and he instructs that they admonish him, saying: *see*, etc. 2 Tim. 4:5: *fulfill your ministry*. And indeed he then fulfills his ministry when he does that for which he received it. But it seems that it does not pertain to a subject to admonish a prelate, Ex. 19:24. It must be said that to argue and reproach irreverently is forbidden, but to admonish charitably is permitted, as Paul did Peter, Gal. 2:11. But why did he not write to the prelate? Because the prelate exists for the sake of the Church, and not the reverse. *The salutation*, etc. It was the apostle's custom to have someone else write the whole epistle, but at the end he would put something in his own hand — 2 Thess., last chapter, where he says: *the salutation is by my own hand, Paul's* — the same also here, lest they be deceived. And he says *be mindful*, etc., because he was in chains at Rome: for Jas. 5:10: *take as an example, brothers, the outcome of hardship and of long-suffering and of labor and of patience, the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord*, etc. Heb., last chapter: *remember your leaders who have spoken to you the word of God, and considering the outcome of their conduct, imitate their faith*. Finally, concluding, he wishes them good, saying *grace*, etc. Jn. 1:17: *grace and truth came through Jesus Christ*: to whom be praise and glory, now and forever. Amen.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“And say to Archippus,.... A name common among the Grecians. This person the apostle calls his fellow soldier, in Plm 1:2 and who was now the minister of the Gospel at Colosse, his fellow minister, or co-pastor Epaphras, being at Rome, and a prisoner there; though by some he is said to be the first bishop of the Laodiceans, but it seems most likely that he now resided at Colosse, and was their minister: who being negligent in his office, they are called upon to say unto him, take heed to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord, that thou fulfil it. The "ministry" he had, was not that of the office of a deacon, as some have thought, but of a preacher of the word; and this he had "received" gifts for, and was called unto it, and installed in it; and that "in", and "by the Lord" himself, and to whom he was accountable for it: and therefore it was incumbent on him to "fulfil it"; by constantly preaching the word, and faithfully administering the ordinances; by defending truth, detecting error, reproving vice, visiting the sick, and comforting the feeble minded; taking heed in all things to himself and doctrine, that he feed the whole flock of God with wholesome food; and, as a wise and faithful steward, give to everyone their portion of meat in due season: hence it appears, that when ministers are negligent in the discharge of their duty, the church has a power to admonish and exhort them to a diligent performance of it.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Say to Archippus - Who this person was we cannot tell; there have been various conjectures concerning him; some think he was bishop, or overseer of the Church at Colosse, in the absence of Epaphras. Whatever he was, it has been supposed that he had been remiss in discharging the duties of his office; and hence this direction of the apostle, which appears here in the light of a reprehension. But if the same person be meant as in the Epistle to Philemon, Plm 1:2, whom St. Paul calls his fellow laborer and fellow soldier, it cannot be supposed that any reproof is here intended; for, as the Epistle to the Colossians, and that to Philemon, were evidently written about the end of the year 62, Archippus could not be a fellow laborer and fellow soldier of the apostle at Rome, and yet a delinquent at Colosse at the same time. It is more likely, therefore, that the words of the apostle convey no censure, but are rather intended to stir him up to farther diligence, and to encourage him in the work, seeing he had so much false doctrine and so many false teachers to contend with.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“What St. Paul here addresses to Archippus, gives us reason to presume that he was then bishop of the Colossians, having succeeded Epaphras, who was then prisoner at Rome with St. Paul. (Bible de Vence)”
1871
A.D.
1871
“say to Archippus--The Colossians (not merely the clergy, but the laymen) are directed, "Speak ye to Archippus." This proves that Scripture belongs to the laity as well as the clergy; and that laymen may profitably admonish the clergy in particular cases when they do so in meekness. BENGEL suggests that Archippus was perhaps prevented from going to the Church assembly by weak health or age. The word, "fulfil," accords with his ministry being near its close (Col 1:25; compare Plm 1:2). However, "fulfil" may mean, as in Ti2 4:5, "make full proof of thy ministry." "Give all diligence to follow it out fully"; a monition perhaps needed by Archippus. in the Lord--The element in which every work of the Christian, and especially the Christian minister, is to be done (Col 4:7; Co1 7:39; Phi 4:2).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.