The interpretation timeline
Ephesians 2:15 Douay-Rheims

Making void the law of commandments contained in decrees; that he might make the two in himself into one new man, making peace;

A.D. 202 – 1871 7 witnesses 9 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
202
A.D.
Irenaeus Patristic
c. A.D. 130–202
“If, then, any one allege that in this respect the flesh of the Lord was different from ours, because it indeed did not commit sin, neither was deceit found in His soul, while we, on the other hand, are sinners, he says what is the fact. But if he pretends that the Lord possessed another substance of flesh, the sayings respecting reconciliation will not agree with that man. For that thing is reconciled which had formerly been in enmity. Now, if the Lord had taken flesh from another substance, He would not, by so doing, have reconciled that one to God which had become inimical through transgression. But now, by means of communion with Himself, the Lord has reconciled man to God the Father, in reconciling us to Himself by the body of His own flesh, and redeeming us by His own blood, as the apostle says to the Ephesians, "In whom we have redemption through His blood, the remission of sins;" and again to the same he says, "Ye who formerly were far off have been brought near in the blood of Christ;" and again, "Abolishing in His flesh the enmities, [even] the law of commandments [contained] in ordinances." And in every Epistle the apostle plainly testifies, that through the flesh of our Lord, and through His blood, we have been saved.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“He was born in a singular way from a virgin by the Spirit of God. He was born to reconcile both Gentile and Jew to God, both of whom had offended God. He reconciled them into one body through the cross. The enmity was in this way slain. This reconciliation took place in his flesh through his body as he suffered on the cross.”
Source
“What is near, and what was far off now that "the middle wall has been broken down" of their "enmity," (are made one) "in His flesh." But Marcion erased the pronoun His, that he might make the enmity refer to flesh, as if (the apostle spoke) of a carnal enmity, instead of the enmity which was a rival to Christ. "For to create in Himself of twain," for He who had made is also the same who creates (just as we have found it stated above: "For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus"), "one new man, making peace" (really new, and really man-no phantom-but new, and newly born of a virgin by the Spirit of God), "that He might reconcile both unto God" (even the God whom both races had offended-both Jew and Gentile), "in one body," says he, "having in it slain the enmity by the cross.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"And brake down," he proceeds, "the middle wall of partition." What the middle wall of partition is, he interprets by saying, "the enmity having abolished in His flesh, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances." Some indeed affirm that he means the wall of the Jews against the Greeks, because it did not allow the Jews to hold intercourse with the Greeks. To me, however, this does not seem to be the meaning, but rather that he calls "the enmity in the flesh," a middle wall, in that it is a common barrier, cutting us off alike from God. As the Prophet says, "Your iniquities separate between you and Me;" for that enmity which He had both against Jews and Gentiles was, as it were, a middle wall. And this, whilst the law existed, was not only not abolished, but rather was strengthened; "for the law," saith the Apostle, "worketh wrath." Just in the same way then as when he says in that passage, "the law worketh wrath," he does not ascribe the whole of this effect to the law itself, but it is to be understood, that it is because we have transgressed it; so also in this place he calls it a middle wall, because through being disobeyed it wrought enmity. The law was a hedge, but this it was made for the sake of security, and for this reason was called "a hedge," to the intent that it might form an inclosure. For listen again to the Prophet, where he says, "I made a trench about it." And again, "Thou hast broken down her fences, so that all they which pass by the way do pluck her." Here therefore it means security and so again, "I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be trodden down." And again, "He gave them the law for a defence." And again, "The Lord executeth righteous acts and made known His ways unto Israel." It became, however, a middle wall, no longer establishing them in security, but cutting them off from God. Such then is the middle wall of partition formed out of the hedge. And to explain what this is, he subjoins, "the enmity in His flesh having abolished, the law of commandments." How so? In that He was slain and dissolved the enmity therein. And not in this way only but also by keeping it. But what then, if we are released from the former transgression, and yet are again compelled to keep it? Then were the case the same over again, whereas He hath destroyed the very law itself. For he says, "Having abolished the law of commandments contained in ordinances." Oh! amazing loving-kindness! He gave us a law that we should keep it, and when we kept it not, and ought to have been punished, He even abrogated the law itself. As if a man, who, having committed a child to a schoolmaster, if he should turn out disobedient, should set him at liberty even from the schoolmaster, and take him away. How great loving-kindness were this!”
Source
“What is meant by "Having abolished by ordinances?" For he makes a wide distinction between "commandments" and "ordinances." He either then means "faith," calling that an "ordinance," (for by faith alone He saved us,) or he means "precept," such as Christ gave, when He said, "But I say unto you, that ye are not to be angry at all." That is to say, "If thou shalt believe that God raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." And again, "The word is nigh thee, in thy mouth, and in thine heart. Say not, Who shall ascend into heaven, or who shall descend into the abyss?" or, who hath "brought Him again from the dead?" Instead of a certain manner of life, He brought in faith. For that He might not save us to no purpose, He both Himself underwent the penalty, and also required of men the faith that is by doctrines. "That he might create in Himself of the twain, one new man." Observe thou, that it is not that the Gentile is become a Jew, but that both the one and the other are entered into another condition. It was not with a view of merely making this last other than he was, but rather, in order to create the two anew. And well does he on all occasions employ the word "create," and does not say "change," in order to point out the power of what was done, and that even though the creation be invisible, yet it is no less a creation than that is, and that we ought not henceforward start away from this, as from natural things. "That He might in Himself of the twain." That is, by Himself. He gave not this charge to another, but Himself, by Himself, melted both the one and the other, and produced a glorious one, and one greater than the first creation; and that one, first, was Himself. For this is the meaning of "in Himself." He Himself first gave the type and example. Laying hold on the one hand of the Jew, and on the other of the Gentile, and Himself being in the midst, He blended them together, made all the estrangement which existed between them to disappear, and fashioned them anew from above by fire and by water; no longer with water and earth, but with water and fire. He became a Jew by circumcision, He became accursed, He became a Gentile without the law, and was over both Gentiles and Jews. "One new man," saith he, "so making peace." Peace for them both towards God, and towards each other. For so long as they continued still Jews and Gentiles, they could not have been reconciled. And had they not been delivered each from his own peculiar condition, they would not have arrived at another and a higher one. For the Jew is then united to the Gentile when he becomes a believer. It is like persons being in a house, with two chambers below, and one large and grand one above: they would not be able to see each other, till they had got above. "Making peace," more especially towards God; for this the context shows.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Having recalled the benefits conferred on the Ephesians in general through Christ, here he recalls them in particular. Concerning this he does two things. First he shows how they drew near to the Jewish people; second, how they were made nearer to God, there, "that he might reconcile both," etc. The first is again divided into three, because first he shows the cause of the drawing-near, second the manner, third the end. The second is there, "and the middle wall," etc. The third is there, "that the two," etc. Now the cause of the drawing-near is Christ, on account of which he says, "for he himself is our peace," etc. And this is an emphatic manner of speaking, for the greater expression of the matter, as if he were to say: I say well that you have been made near, but this was done through Christ, because he himself is our peace, that is, the cause of our peace. Hence he was saying, John 14:27: "My peace I give to you." Now this manner of speaking is accustomed to occur when the whole that is in the effect depends on the cause, just as when we say of God that he himself is our salvation, because whatever there is of salvation in us is caused by God. Since, therefore, whatever there is of peace in us is caused by Christ, and consequently whatever there is of drawing-near — because when a man has been made peaceful with another, he can securely walk or draw near to him — therefore he says that he is our peace. For at his nativity the Angels announced peace. Luke 2:14: "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace," etc. Also, with Christ himself existing in the body, the world had the greatest peace, such as it had not had before. Psalm 71:7: "In his days shall justice arise," etc. He also, rising again, announced peace. Luke, the last chapter: "he said to them: Peace be to you." There follows, "who made both one," namely because Christ joined both peoples into one — that is, the Jews who worshipped the true God, and the Gentiles, who were alienated from this worship of God. John 10:16: "I have other sheep that are not of this fold," etc., up to there: "and there shall be one fold and one shepherd." Ezekiel 37:22: "one king shall rule over all," etc. Now the manner of the drawing-near is shown when he adds, "and the middle wall," etc. Now this manner is through the removal of that which divided. For the understanding of the letter we ought to imagine one great field, and many men gathered there, in which indeed there is stretched out and raised up through the middle one wall dividing them, so that there is not seen to be one people, but two. Whoever, therefore, should remove the wall, would join the gathering of those men into one crowd, and one people would be made. Thus is what is said here to be understood. For this world is like a field — Matthew 13:38: "the field is the world." Now this field, namely the world, is full of men — Genesis 1:28: "increase, and multiply, and fill the earth." Now in this field there is a wall, because some are on one side, some on the other; and this wall can be called the old law according to its carnal observances, in which the Jews were kept shut up, as is said in Galatians 3:23: "we were kept under the law, shut up unto that faith which was to be revealed." Song of Songs 2:9: "he stands behind our wall"; namely because Christ was prefigured through the old law. But Christ removed this wall, and thus, since no gap remained, one people of Jews and Gentiles was made. And this is what he says: I say that he made both one, in this manner, namely by loosing the middle wall. I say a wall of loose stone, not of a mortared wall. For a wall is then a wall of loose stone, when the stones in it are not glued together with mortar, and it is not erected for this purpose, that it endure forever, but until a predetermined time. The old law, therefore, is a wall of loose stone on account of two things. First, because it was not glued together by charity, which is, as it were, the mortar gluing each one to another, and all together to Christ. Below, 4:3: "careful to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace." For the old law is a law of fear, inducing men through punishments and threats to the observance of the commandments. And if any, in that time of the law, observed it out of charity, they already belonged to the New Testament, as Augustine says, which is the law of love. Romans 8:15: "For you have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear," etc. Second, the old law is a wall of loose stone because it was not given to last forever, but until a predetermined time. Galatians 4:1ff: "As long as the heir is a child, he differs nothing from a servant, though he is lord of all, but is under tutors and guardians until the time predetermined by the father: so we also, when we were," etc. But here a question arises, because he says "loosing the wall of loose stone," yet the contrary is said, Matthew 5:17: "I have not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill it." I respond. It must be said that in the old law there were moral precepts and ceremonial precepts. The moral precepts indeed Christ did not destroy, but fulfilled, by adding counsels over and above, and by expounding those things which the Scribes and Pharisees understood badly. Hence he was saying, Matthew 5:19: "unless your justice abound more than that of the Scribes," etc. And again: "It was said to the ancients: You shall love your neighbor, and hate your enemy. But I say to you: love your enemies," etc. But the ceremonial precepts he indeed destroyed as to their substance, but fulfilled as to that which they prefigured, applying the thing prefigured to the figure. It is therefore to be understood that here he says "loosing," namely as to the observance of the carnal law. And to loose this, namely the wall of loose stone, is to dissolve the enmities that were between the Jews and the Gentiles: because these wished to keep the law, but those not at all, from which arose between them anger and envy. But certainly Christ dissolved these enmities in his flesh which he assumed. For at his nativity, peace was immediately announced to men. Luke 2:14. Or "in his flesh," namely as immolated, because, as is said below, 5:2: "he delivered himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God." In which sacrifice indeed all those sacrifices were fulfilled, and ceased. Hebrews 10:14: "For by one oblation he has perfected forever those who are sanctified." Now what this wall is he intimates, saying that it is "the law of commandments," as if he were to say: loosing the wall, that is, the law of commandments, etc. Now the old law is called "the law of commandments," not because other laws lack commandments; for the new law also has commandments. John 13:34: "A new commandment I give to you." But it is called so on account of two things: first indeed on account of the great number of the legal commandments, to such an extent that they cannot be kept by men, according to that word, Acts 15:10: "this is a burden which neither we nor our fathers were able to bear." Job 11:6: "that his law is manifold," etc. Or it is called "of commandments," that is, of works. Romans 3:27: "Where then is your boasting? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith." Hence, just as the Baptism of John is called the Baptism of water, because it only cleansed outwardly, but did not sanctify inwardly, so also the old law is called the law of works, because it only prescribed what they ought to do, but did not confer grace, by which they might be helped to fulfill the law. But the new law directs in what is to be done, by prescribing, and helps toward fulfilling it, by conferring grace. I say "making void," just as the imperfect is made void by the perfect, and the shadow by the truth. 1 Corinthians 13:10: "But when that which is perfect has come, that which is in part shall be made void," namely the imperfection and shadow of the old law, concerning which, Hebrews 10:1: "for the law, having a shadow of the good things to come," etc. And this "by decrees," that is, by the precepts of the New Testament, through which the law is excluded. Leviticus 26:10: "You shall eat the oldest of the old," that is, the precepts of the law of nature together with the new law; and, its precepts having been taken up, "you shall cast away the old," that is, the ceremonial precepts of the old law as to their substance, as has been said. Now he shows the end of the drawing-near, saying, "that he might create the two in himself," etc. Which end indeed is that the two said peoples be made one people. Now the things that are united must be united in some one thing, and because the law divided, they could not be united in the law; but Christ, succeeding in place of the law, and faith in him — as the truth succeeds the figure — created them in himself. John 17:22: "that they may be one, as we also are one." Matthew 18:20: "For where there are two or three gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." And this, "making peace," in one new man, that is, in Christ himself, who is called the new man on account of the new manner of his conception. Jeremiah 31:22: "The Lord has created a new thing upon the earth: a woman shall compass a man." Likewise, on account of the newness of grace which he conferred. Galatians, the last chapter: "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature." Below, 4:23: "be renewed in the spirit of your mind, and put on the new man, who," etc. Likewise, on account of the new commandments which he brought. John 13:34: "A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another," etc. And although this seems to be the intention of the Apostle, nevertheless in the Gloss the wall is doubled: because on the part of the Jews the law is posited as a kind of obstacle, but on the part of the Gentiles it is idolatry. Consequently, when he says, "that he might reconcile both," etc., he shows how they drew near to God. Concerning this he does two things. First he manifests their reconciliation to God; second he sets forth the manifestation of the reconciliation, there, "and coming, he preached," etc. It must be known that the love of neighbor is the way to the peace of God; because, as is said, 1 John 4:20: "for he who does not love his brother whom he sees, how can he love God whom he does not see?" And Augustine says that no one should think he has peace with Christ, if he is at discord with a Christian. First, therefore, he sets forth the peace of men with one another made through Christ, and from that the peace of men with God. On account of which he says, "that he might reconcile both," now united, in the one body of the Church, namely in Christ. Romans 12:5: "we, being many, are one body in Christ." He might reconcile them, I say, to God through faith and charity. 2 Corinthians 5:19: "God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself." And this he did through the cross, "killing the enmities in himself," because he killed the enmities of the Jews and the Gentiles, which were through the law, fulfilling the figures of the Old Testament; but the enmities that were between God and men through sin, he killed in himself, when through the death of the cross he blotted out sin. Galatians 1:4: "who gave himself for our sins." Hebrews 9:28: "Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many." He says therefore: "killing the enmities," that is, sins, "in himself," in the immolation of his own body. Colossians 1:20: "making peace through the blood of his cross, whether the things that are in the heavens, or the things that are on the earth." Romans 5:10: "when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son." Likewise Colossians 1:19: "it pleased that in Christ all fullness should dwell, and through him to reconcile all things in himself." Since, therefore, Christ satisfied sufficiently for our sins, it followed that, the price having been paid, reconciliation should come about. Now he sets forth the manifestation of this reconciliation, saying: "and coming, he preached," etc. Now he sets forth, first, the announcement of the peace or reconciliation; second, the cause and reason of the peace, there: "for through him we have access," etc. The reconciliation of God to man through Christ is therefore manifest, because Christ himself not only reconciled us to God, and killed the enmities, but also, "coming," namely in the flesh, "preached," that is, announced, "peace." Or "coming" after the resurrection, when he stood in the midst of the disciples, and said to them: "Peace be to you," Luke, the last chapter. Isaiah 61:1: "he has sent me to announce to the meek," etc. And Isaiah 52:7: "how beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who announces and preaches peace, who announces good, who preaches salvation," etc. "He preached," I say, not to one people only, but "to you Gentiles who were far off," to whom, even if not in his own person, yet through his apostles he announced peace. Matthew, the last chapter: "Going therefore, teach all nations, baptizing," etc. Isaiah 33:13: "Hear, you who are far off, what I have done, and acknowledge," etc. And "peace to those who were near" — supply: Christ announced it in his own person. Romans 15:8: "For I say that Christ Jesus was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made to the fathers." Isaiah 54:15: "Behold, a sojourner shall come who was not with me; he who was formerly your stranger shall be joined to you." Now he shows the cause and form of the peace, saying, "for through him we both have access," that is, the two peoples, "in one Spirit," that is, united by the union of the Holy Spirit. Below, 4:3: "careful to keep the unity of the spirit," etc. 1 Corinthians 12:11: "But all these things one and the same Spirit works," etc. Now in this way we have access to the Father through Christ, because Christ works through the Holy Spirit. Romans 8:9: "But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his." And therefore whatever is done through the Holy Spirit is also done through Christ. Also, by this that he says, "to the Father," it is to be understood that it also pertains to the whole Trinity, because on account of the unity of essence, in the Father is the Son and the Holy Spirit, and in the Holy Spirit is the Father and the Son. Therefore, when he says "to the Father," he specially shows that whatever the Son has, he has from the Father, and also acknowledges that he has it from him.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Having abolished in his flesh the enmity,.... The ceremonial law, as appears by what follows, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; which consisted of many precepts, and carnal ordinances; and is so called because it was an indication of God's hatred of sin, by requiring sacrifice for it; and because it was an occasion of stirring up the enmity of the natural man, it being a burden and a weariness to the flesh, by reason of its many and troublesome rites; and because it was the cause of enmity between Jew and Gentile: the Jews say (g), that Sinai, the mount on which the law was given, signifies "hatred"; and that it is so called because from it descended "hatred" or "enmity" to the nations of the world: now this Christ abolished, "in his flesh", or by it; not by his incarnation, but by the sacrifice of his flesh, or human nature, and that as in union with his divine nature; but not until he had fulfilled it in himself, which was one end of his coming into the world; and then he abolished it, so as that it ought not to be, and so as that it is not, and of no use and service; and that because it was faulty and deficient, weak and unprofitable, as well as intolerable; and because there was a change in the priesthood; and because it was contrary to a spirit of liberty, the great blessing of the Gospel; and that there might be a reconciliation and a coalition between Jew and Gentile, as follows: for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; which explains what is meant before by making both one; and expresses the strictness of the union between Jew and Gentile, they became as one man; and points at the manner in which they became so strictly united; and that is by being made new men, or new creatures, by having a work of grace upon their souls, and so baptized into one body, and made to drink of one and the same Spirit; the foundation of which union is in himself; for Jew and Gentile, male and female, bond and free, are all one in Christ Jesus; he is the cornerstone in which they all meet, and the head to which the whole body is joined. (g) T. Bab. Sabbat, fol. 89. 1. Shemot Rabba, sect. 2. fol. 92. 4.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Having abolished in his flesh - By his incarnation and death he not only made an atonement for sin, but he appointed the doctrine of reconciliation to God, and of love to each other, to be preached in all nations; and thus glory was brought to God in the highest, and on earth, peace and good will were diffused among men. The enmity of which the apostle speaks was reciprocal among the Jews and Gentiles. The former detested the Gentiles, and could hardly allow them the denomination of men; the latter had the Jews in the most sovereign contempt, because of the peculiarity of their religious rites and ceremonies, which were different from those of all the other nations of the earth. The law of commandments - Contained in, or rather concerning, ordinances; which law was made merely for the purpose of keeping the Jews a distinct people, and pointing out the Son of God till he should come. When, therefore, the end of its institution was answered, it was no longer necessary; and Christ by his death abolished it. To make in himself - To make one Church out of both people, which should be considered the body of which Jesus Christ is the head. Thus he makes one new man - one new Church; and thus he makes and establishes peace. I think the apostle still alludes to the peace-offering, שלום shalom, among the Jews. They have a saying, Sephra, fol. 121: Whosoever offers a peace-offering sacrifice, brings peace to the world. Such a peace-offering was the death of Christ, and by it peace is restored to the earth.”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“Rather, make "enmity" an apposition to "the middle wall of partition"; "Hath broken down the middle wall of partition (not merely as English Version, 'between us,' but also between all men and God), to wit, the enmity (Rom 8:7) by His flesh" (compare Eph 2:16; Rom 8:3). the law of commandments contained in--Greek, "the law of the commandments (consisting) in ordinances." This law was "the partition" or "fence," which embodied the expression of the "enmity" (the "wrath" of God against our sin, and our enmity to Him, Eph 2:3) (Rom 4:15; Rom 5:20; Rom 7:10-11; Rom 8:7). Christ has in, or by, His crucified flesh, abolished it, so far as its condemning and enmity-creating power is concerned (Col 2:14), substituting for it the law of love, which is the everlasting spirit of the law, and which flows from the realization in the soul of His love in His death for us. Translate what follows, "that He might make the two (Jews and Gentiles) into one new man." Not that He might merely reconcile the two to each other, but incorporate the two, reconciled in Him to God, into one new man; the old man to which both belonged, the enemy of God, having been slain in His flesh on the cross. Observe, too, ONE new man; we are all in God's sight but one in Christ, as we are but one in Adam [ALFORD]. making peace--primarily between all and God, secondarily between Jews and Gentiles; He being "our peace." This "peace-making" precedes its publication (Eph 2:17).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.