So also Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many; the second time he shall appear without sin to them that expect him unto salvation.

“"So Christ was once offered." By whom offered? evidently by Himself. Here he says that He is not Priest only, but Victim also, and what is sacrificed. On this account are the words "was offered." "Was once offered" (he says) "to bear the sins of many." Why "of many," and not "of all"? Because not all believed. For He died indeed for all, that is His part: for that death was a counterbalance against the destruction of all men. But He did not bear the sins of all men, because they were not willing. And what is the meaning of "He bare the sins"? Just as in the Oblation we bear up our sins and say, "Whether we have sinned voluntarily or involuntarily, do Thou forgive," that is, we make mention of them first, and then ask for their forgiveness. So also was it done here. Where has Christ done this? Hear Himself saying, "And for their sakes I sanctify Myself." (John xvii. 19.) Lo! He bore the sins. He took them from men, and bore them to the Father; not that He might determine anything against them (mankind), but that He might forgive them. "Unto them that look for Him shall He appear" (he says) "the second time without sin unto salvation." What is "without sin"? it is as much as to say, He sinneth not. For neither did He die as owing the debt of death, nor yet because of sin. But how "shall He appear"? To punish, you say. He did not however say this, but what was cheering; "shall He appear unto them that look for Him, without sin unto salvation." So that for the time to come they no longer need sacrifices to save themselves, but to do this by deeds.”

“Above, the Apostle showed what is common to the new and the old testament, insofar as the old and the new agree; here he shows the difference of each. And concerning this he does two things. For first he shows that in the new there is a better cleansing; second, that it is more perfect, at the place, "nor as often." Again the first is divided into two. For first he shows that, as to that which is cleansed, and as to that by which the cleansing is effected, the cleansing is better in the new; second he makes clear what he said, at the place, "for not into things made with hands." He says therefore: "it is necessary therefore" that the patterns of the heavenly things, namely the tabernacle itself, which, as regards us, is the pattern, although simply speaking it is the thing patterned and the figure of it, and therefore of lesser dignity, since the thing figured is nobler than the figure, as the body is nobler than the shadow, "be cleansed by these," namely by the sacrifices; "but the heavenly things themselves," namely the new testament, "by better sacrifices than these"; better indeed, because the other things were cleansed by the blood of animals, but in the new testament the cleansing is effected by the blood of Christ. But better things are always cleansed by better things. But these were heavenly, that is, the figure of heavenly things. If therefore those things were cleansed by blood, it is fitting that these heavenly things be cleansed by better blood. But on the contrary: in heaven there is no uncleanness. I respond. It must be said that, according to the Gloss, by "heavenly things" are understood those things which pertain to the state of the present Church, which are called heavenly. Likewise the faithful bear the image of heavenly things, inasmuch as in mind they dwell in the heavens. Or otherwise, and better, that by "heavenly things" is understood the heavenly homeland. And here the Apostle speaks in the manner in which, in the old testament, the tabernacle was said to be cleansed — not that it had in itself any uncleanness, but because certain irregularities were cleansed, by which people were hindered from approaching the sanctuary. And the heavenly things are said to be cleansed, inasmuch as through the sacrament of the new law sins are purged which hinder entrance into the heavenly things. Again, he says "sacrifices," in the plural. On the contrary: there is only one sacrifice of Christ. Below, X, 14: "for by one oblation he has perfected forever those who are sanctified." I respond. Although it is one in itself, yet it was figured by the many sacrifices of the old law. From this passage it is gathered that the sacrifices of the old law were good. For "better" is not said except with respect to something good. Then, when he says "for not into things made with hands," etc., he shows that the heavenly things are cleansed by better sacrifices. For the high priest expiated the sanctuary, which was made by hands; but Christ entered not into holy places made by hands, which were, as regards us, patterns of the true ones, but into heaven itself, which he expiated not in itself, but as regards us, as has been said; but he did not expiate by carnal sacrifices, because Christ did not come to offer such things. Ps. XXXIX, v. 6: "holocaust and sin offering you did not require." Again: "you will not delight in holocausts." Again, above, VII, 14: "it is manifest that the Lord sprang from the tribe of Judah, of which tribe no man attended at the altar"; but he entered into heaven itself. Mark, last chapter: "the Lord Jesus indeed was taken up into heaven." Acts I, 11: "this Jesus, who is taken up from you into heaven." But why? "That he may appear in the presence of God for us." And the Apostle speaks alluding to the rite of the old law, according to which the high priest who entered the holy of holies stood before the propitiatory to pray for the people; so also Christ entered heaven, as man, that he might stand before God for our salvation. But these differ, because the priest, hindered by the smoke that rose from the censer, did not see the holy of holies, nor did he see any face; but Christ appears before the face of God, not that there is there a bodily countenance, nor any cloud, but manifest knowledge. But could not Christ, while existing on earth, appear before the face of God, since God sees all things? I respond. It must be said that, just as Augustine, speaking to God, says: "you were with me, and I was not with you," because indeed God is in all things by essence, presence, and power, but the wicked are not with God by grace — so Christ is said to have entered that he may appear before the face of God, because, although he always saw him with clear vision, as one perfectly blessed, yet the state of a wayfarer, as such, does not have this, but only the heavenly state does. And therefore when, perfectly blessed in body and soul, he ascended, he entered that he might appear before the face of God, that is, he entered the place where God is manifestly seen. And this for us. For he ascended for this, that he might prepare a way for us. John XIV, 2f.: "I go to prepare a place for you. And again I will come and take you to myself." Micah II, 13: "he ascended, opening the way before you." For the body ought to follow its head. Matthew XXIV, 28: "wherever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together." Then, when he says "nor as often," he shows that the cleansing of the new testament is more perfect than that of the old. But he shows this by two things. First, by the fact that that one was repeated every year, but this one only once. Likewise as to the effect, because that one could not take away sins, which this one can. Concerning this, then, he does two things. For first he shows the first; second the second, at the place, "having a shadow." But it must be known that the Apostle had above said three things about Christ: first, that he is high priest; second, what is the dignity of the place he entered; third, how he entered, namely with blood; and these three he has already made clear. Here he declares when he entered, since just as the legal high priest entered once a year, Christ entered only once. And this was the fourth point. Hence concerning this he does three things. First he shows what was done in the old testament; second, that it would be unfitting for this to be done in the new testament, at the place, "otherwise"; third he shows what is done in the new testament, at the place, "but now, once." For in the old testament the high priest, although he entered only once a year, nevertheless every year, by precept of the law, it was necessary for him to enter with another's blood, as is said in Leviticus XVI, 14. "But Christ entered not into a place made by hand," etc. "Nor that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entered into the holies every year with another's blood." Then, when he says "otherwise he ought," etc., he proves that it would be unfitting for this to be done in the new testament, because a very great absurdity would follow; for since Christ entered by his own blood, it would follow that he would have had to suffer often from the beginning of the world. But it is not so with the old sacrifice, because that was offered for the sins of the children of Israel. But that people began spiritually when the law was given, and therefore it is not necessary for it to be offered from the beginning of the world. But Christ offered himself for the sins of the whole world, because he himself has been made our propitiation for our sins and those of the whole world, I John II, 2. And thus, if he were offered often, he would have had to be born and suffer from the beginning of the world, which would have been a very great absurdity. But on the contrary, Apoc. XIII, 8: "the lamb, who was slain from the beginning of the world." I respond. It is true he was slain, that is, prefigured to be slain from the beginning of the world, as in the slaying of Abel. Then, when he says "but now," he shows what is done in the new testament, and concerning this he does two things. First he gives two reasons why the sacrifice is not repeated in the new testament; second he explains them, at the place, "and as," etc. He says therefore: "now therefore Christ has appeared once at the consummation of the ages." I Cor. X, 11: "we are they upon whom the ends of the ages are come." And he says this on account of the number of years, because it is now more than a thousand years since he said this. For the ages of the world are taken according to the ages of man, which are principally distinguished according to the state of advancing, not according to the number of years. Thus the first age was before the flood, in which there was neither written law nor punishment, like infancy. Another from Noah to Abraham, and so on for the rest, so that the last age is the present state, after which there is no other state of salvation, just as there is none after old age. But just as in the other ages of man the number of years is determined, but not in old age, since old age begins from the sixtieth year, and some live for a hundred and twenty years, so it is not determined how long this state of the world ought to last; nevertheless it is the consummation of the ages, because there remains no other for salvation. But in this age Christ appeared once; of which he gives two reasons, namely, why he was offered only once. The first is, because in the old testament sins were not taken away, which is done through the sacrifice of Christ. The other is, because the legal priest did not offer his own blood, as Christ did. Hence he says that he "appeared unto the destruction of sin, by his sacrifice," namely of himself, and therefore that one is repeated, but not this one. I Peter III, 18: "Christ died once for our sins." Then, when he says "and as," he explains these reasons. And first the second, second the first, at the place, "the law having a shadow." He explains the second by a comparison with other men, hence concerning this he does two things. For first he shows what happens to other men; second he shows what happens in Christ, at the place, "so also Christ, once." For in any man we find two things: namely, the necessity of dying; likewise, that he rises again, not to be cleansed, but to be judged concerning his deeds. He touches on the first when he says, "and as it is appointed unto men once to die." But on the contrary: it seems that this is not appointed, but rather man brought this about by sinning, since it is said, Wisdom I, 13, that God made not death, neither has he pleasure in the destruction of the living. And a little after: "but the wicked with hands and words have called it to themselves." I respond. It must be said that in death three things are to be considered: namely, the natural cause, and as to this, from the condition of nature it is appointed that man die once, inasmuch as he is composed of contraries. Second, the gift bestowed: and as to this, there was given to man, as part of his condition, the benefit of original justice, through which the soul held the body together, so that he was able not to die. Third, the merit of death, and so man by sinning merited to lose that benefit, and thus incurred death. Hence he says that the wicked, with their hands — namely, by handling the forbidden fruit — called death to themselves. Man therefore, by demeriting, is the cause of death; but God, as judge. For "the wages of sin is death," Rom. VI, 23. "Once"; which indeed is true of common custom, although some have been raised up again, such as Lazarus and the widow's son, who afterward died. But as to the second, he says, "but after this the judgment," because after they rise again, they will not die again, but judgment will immediately follow. "For we must all be manifested before the judgment seat of Christ, that everyone may receive the proper things of the body, according as he has done," as is said in II Cor. V, 10. Then, when he says "so also Christ," etc., he shows how these things apply to Christ. And as to the first he says that "so also Christ was offered once." And in this he agrees with the others. But he differs in two things: first, because since Christ did not descend from Adam by way of seminal reason, but only as to bodily substance, he did not contract original sin, and therefore was not a debtor of that state. Gen. II, 17: "in whatsoever day you shall eat of it, you shall die the death." But by his own will he took on death. John X, 18: "no man takes my life from me," etc. Therefore he says that "he was offered." Is. LIII, 7: "he was offered because it was his own will." And I Peter III, 18: "Christ died once for our sins." Second he differs, because our death is the effect of sin. Rom. VI, 23: "the wages of sin is death." But the death of Christ is destructive of sin. Therefore he says, "to exhaust the sins of many," that is, to remove them. Nor does he say "of all," because the death of Christ, although it is sufficient for all, nevertheless does not have efficacy except as regards those who are to be saved. For not all subject themselves to it through faith and good works. As to the second he says: "but the second time he will appear without sin." Concerning the second coming he says two things. First he sets down its difference from the first, because the second will be without sin. For in the first, although he did not have sin, yet he came "in the likeness of sinful flesh," Rom. VIII, 3. Likewise in the first he was made a sacrifice for sin. II Cor. V, 21: "him who knew no sin, he has made sin for us." But in the second these things will not be, therefore he says that he will appear without sin. Second he sets down that which is proper to the second coming, because he will not appear to be judged, but to judge, rendering reward for merits. Hence he says that "he will appear." And indeed, although to all — even to those who pierced him according to the flesh — yet according to his divinity only to the elect, who await him through faith, unto their salvation. Is. XXX, 18: "blessed are all they that wait for him." Phil. III, 20f.: "we await the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will reform the body of our lowliness, conformed to the body of his glory."”

“So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many,.... As man dies but once, Christ was offered but once, or he suffered and died but once; and that was not on his own account, or for his own sins, "but to bear the sins of many": not of angels but of men, and these not a few, but "many"; which is said to magnify the grace of God, to exalt the satisfaction and righteousness of Christ, and to encourage souls to hope in him: hence many are brought to believe in him, and many are justified by him, have their sins forgiven them, and are glorified; though Christ bore not the sins of all men; for as all men have not faith, all are not justified, pardoned, and saved: what he bore were "sins"; all kind of sin, every act of sin, and all that belongs to it; its filth, guilt, and punishment, even the iniquity of all his people; which must be a prodigious weight, and than which nothing could be more nauseous: his bearing them supposes they were upon him, though not in him, imputed, though not inherent; that he did not sink under them; that he made an entire satisfaction for them, and bore them wholly away, both from the persons of his people, and from the sight of justice. The way in which he came to bear them was this; he became a surety for all the elect; his Father imputed to him all their sins, and he voluntarily took them upon himself; where justice found them, and demanded satisfaction of him for them, and he gave it; which is an instance both of his great love, and of his great strength: and unto them that look for him: with affection, faith and patience: shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation; this is to be understood of Christ's visible and personal appearance on earth, which will be a glorious one; he will appear in his own glory, and in his Father's glory, and in the glory of the holy angels, and in the glory of his power, to the joy of saints, and to the terror of the wicked; for every eye shall see him: and this is said to be "the second time"; that is, that he appears on earth, and personally; for though he often appears to his people, it is in a spiritual way; and though he appeared to Stephen and to Paul, yet not on earth, but in heaven; and this is called the second time, with reference to his first appearance in human nature at his incarnation, and after that he ascended to heaven; and as this will be the second, it will be the last: the manner in which he will appear, will be, "without sin"; without sin itself; without any thing like it: without any infirmities, which though not sinful are the effects of sin; without sin imputed to him, with which he appeared before; without being a sacrifice for sin; and without sin upon his people that come with him, or he shall meet whom he shall raise, or change, and take to himself: and the end of his appearance with respect to them, will be "unto salvation"; the end of his first appearance was to obtain salvation for his people, and he has obtained it, and there is a comfortable application of it made unto them by the Spirit of God; but the full possession of it will be hereafter, and into this will Christ put them, when he shall appear: the Alexandrian copy adds, "by faith", and also some other copies. Next: Hebrews Chapter 10”

“So Christ was once offered - He shall die no more; he has borne away the sins of many, and what he has done once shall stand good for ever. Yet he will appear a second time without sin, χωρις ἁμαρτιας, without a sin-offering; That he has already made. Unto salvation - To deliver the bodies of believers from the empire of death, to reunite them to their purified souls, and bring both into his eternal glory. This is salvation, and the very highest of which the human being is capable. Amen! Even so, come Lord Jesus! Hallelujah! 1. In the preceding notes I have given my reasons for dissenting from our translation of the 15th, 16th, and 17th verses. Many learned men are of the same opinion; but I have not met with one who appears to have treated the whole in a more satisfactory manner than Dr. Macknight, and for the edification of my readers I shall here subjoin the substance of what he has written on this point. "Heb 9:15. Mediator of the new covenant. See Heb 8:7. The word διαθηκη, here translated covenant, answers to the Hebrew word berith, which all the translators of the Jewish Scriptures have understood to signify a covenant. The same signification our translators have affixed to the word διαθηκη, as often as it occurs in the writings of the evangelists and apostles, except in the history of the institution of the supper, and in Co2 3:6 : and Heb 7:22, and in the passage under consideration; in which places, copying the Vulgate version, they have rendered διαθηκη by the word testament. Beza, following the Syriac Version, translates διαθηκη everywhere by the words foedas, pactum, except in the 16th, 17th, and 20th verses of this chapter, where likewise following the Syriac version, he has testamentum. Now if καινη διαθηκη, the new testament, in the passages above mentioned, means the Gospel covenant, as all interpreters acknowledge, παλαια διαθηκη, the old testament, Co2 3:14, and πρωτη διαθηκη, the first testament, Heb 9:15, must certainly be the Sinaitic covenant or law of Moses, as is evident also from Heb 9:20. On this supposition it may be asked, 1. In what sense the Sinaitic covenant or law of Moses, which required perfect obedience to all its precepts under penalty of death, and allowed no mercy to any sinner, however penitent, can be called a testament, which is a deed conferring something valuable on a person who may accept or refuse it, as he thinks fit? Besides, the transaction at Sinai, in which God promised to continue the Israelites in Canaan, on condition they refrained from the wicked practices of the Canaanites, and observed his statutes, Lev. 18, can in no sense be called a testament. 2. If the law of Moses be a testament, and if, to render that testament valid, the death of the testator be necessary, as the English translators have taught us, Heb 9:16, I ask who it was that made the testament of the law? Was it God or Moses? And did either of them die to render it valid? 3. I observe that even the Gospel covenant is improperly called a testament, because, notwithstanding all its blessings were procured by the death of Christ, and are most freely bestowed, it lost any validity which, as a testament, it is thought to have received by the death of Christ, when he revived again on the third day. 4. The things affirmed in the common translation of Heb 9:15, concerning the new testament, namely, that it has a Mediator; that that Mediator is the Testator himself; that there were transgressions of a former testament, for the redemption of which the Mediator of the new testament died; and, Heb 9:19, that the first testament was made by sprinkling the people in whose favor it was made with blood; are all things quite foreign to a testament. For was it ever known in any nation that a testament needed a mediator? Or that the testator was the mediator of his own testament? Or that it was necessary the testator of a new testament should die to redeem the transgressions of a former testament? Or that any testament was ever made by sprinkling the legatees with blood? These things however were usual in covenants. They had mediators who assisted at the making of them, and were sureties for the performance of them. They were commonly ratified by sacrifices, the blood of which was sprinkled on the parties; withal, if any former covenant was infringed by the parties, satisfaction was given at the making of a second covenant. 5. By calling Christ the Mediator of the new testament our thoughts are turned away entirely from the view which the Scriptures give us of his death as a sacrifice for sin; whereas, if he is called the Mediator of the new covenant, which is the true translation of διαθηκης καινης μεσιτης, that appellation directly suggests to us that the new covenant was procured and ratified by his death as a sacrifice for sin. Accordingly Jesus, on account of his being made a priest by the oath of God, is said to be the Priest or Mediator of a better covenant than that of which the Levitical priests were the mediators. I acknowledge that in classical Greek διαθηκη, commonly signifies a testament. Yet, since the Seventy have uniformly translated the Hebrew word berith, which properly signifies a covenant, by the word διαθηκη, in writing Greek the Jews naturally used διαθηκη for συνθηκη as our translators have acknowledged by their version of Heb 10:16. To conclude: Seeing in the verses under consideration διαθηκη may be translated a covenant; and seeing, when so translated, these verses make a better sense, and agree better with the scope of the apostle's reasoning than if it were translated a testament; we can be at no loss to know which translation of διαθηκη in these verses ought to be preferred. Nevertheless, the absurdity of a phraseology to which readers have been long accustomed, without attending distinctly to its meaning, does not soon appear. "He is the Mediator. Here it is remarkable that Jesus is not called διαθεμενος, the Testator, but μεσιτης, the Mediator, of the new covenant; first, because he procured the new covenant for mankind, in which the pardon of sin is promised; for, as the apostle tells us, his death, as a sacrifice for sin, is the consideration on account of which the pardon of the transgressions of the first covenant is granted. Secondly, because the new covenant having been ratified as well as procured by the death of Christ, he is fitly called the Mediator of that covenant in the same sense that God's oath is called, Heb 6:17, the mediator, or confirmor, of his promise. Thirdly, Jesus, who died to procure the new covenant, being appointed by God the high priest thereof, to dispense his blessings, he is on that account also called, Heb 8:6, the mediator of that better covenant. Heb 9:16. For where a covenant (is made by sacrifice), there is a necessity that the death of the appointed sacrifice be produced. This elliptical expression must be completed, if, as is probable, the apostle had now in his eye the covenant which God made with Noah and Abraham. His covenant is recorded, Gen 8:20, where we are told, that on coming out of the ark Noah offered a burnt-offering of every clean beast and fowl. And the Lord smelled a sweet savor. And the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground, neither will I again smite any more every living thing as I have done. This promise or declaration God called his covenant with men, and with every living creature. Gen 9:9, Gen 9:10. In like manner God made a covenant with Abraham by sacrifice, Gen 15:9, Gen 15:18, and with the Israelites at Sinai, Exo 24:8. See also Psa 50:5. By making his covenants with men in this manner, God taught them that his intercourses with them were all founded on an expiation afterwards to be made for their sins by the sacrifice of the seed of the woman, the bruising of whose heel, or death, was foretold at the fall. On the authority of these examples, the practice of making covenants by sacrifice prevailed among the Jews; Jer 34:18; Zac 9:11; and even among the heathens; for they had the knowledge of these examples by tradition. Stabant et caesa jungebant foedera porca; Virgil, Aeneid, viii. 611. Hence the phrases, foedus ferire and percutere, to strike or kill the covenant. "There is a necessity that the death του διαθεμενου, of the appointed. Here we may supply either the word θυματος, sacrifice, or ζωου, animal, which might be either a calf, a goat, a bull, or any other animal which the parties making the covenant chose. Διαθεμενου is the participle of the second aorist of the middle voice of the verb διατιθημι, constituo, I appoint. Wherefore its primary and literal signification is, of the appointed. Our translators have given the word this sense, Luk 22:29; Καγω διατιθεμαι ὑμιν, καθως διετιθετο μοι ὁ Πατηρ μου, βασιλειαν. And I appoint to you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed to me a kingdom. "Be brought in; Θανατον αναγκη φερεσθαι του διαθεμενου, Elsner, vol. ii., p. 381, has shown that the word φερεσθαι is sometimes used in a forensic sense for what is produced, or proved, or made apparent in a court of judicature. Wherefore the apostle's meaning is, that it is necessary the death of the appointed sacrifice be brought in, or produced, at the making of the covenant. In the margin of our Bibles this clause is rightly translated, be brought in. See Act 25:7, where φεροντες is used in the forensic sense. Heb 9:17. A covenant is firm over dead sacrifices; Επι νεκροις. Νεκροις being an adjective, it must have a substantive agreeing with it, either expressed or understood. The substantive understood in this place, I think, is θυμασι, sacrifices; for which reason I have supplied it in the translation. Perhaps the word ζωοις, animals, may be equally proper; especially as, in the following clause, διαθεμενος is in the gender of the animals appointed for the sacrifice. Our translators have supplied the word ανθρωποις, men, and have translated επι νεκροις, after men are dead, contrary to the propriety of the phrase. "It never hath force whilst the appointed liveth; Ὁτε ζῃ ὁ διαθεμενος. Supply μοσχος, or τραγος, or ταυρος· whilst the calf, or goat, or bull, appointed for the sacrifice of ratification, liveth. The apostle having, in Heb 9:15, showed that Christ's death was necessary as ὁ Μεσιτης, the Mediator, that is, the procurer, and ratifier of the new covenant, he in the 16th and 17th verses observes that, since God's covenants with men were all ratified by sacrifice to show that his intercourses with men are founded on the sacrifice of his Son, it was necessary that the new covenant itself should be ratified by his Son's actually dying as a sacrifice. 1. "The faultiness of the common translation of the 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, and 20th verses of this chapter having been already shown in the notes, nothing needs be added here, except to call the reader's attention to the propriety and strength of the apostle's reasoning, as it appears in the translation of these verses which I have given, compared with his reasoning as represented in the common version." 2. It is supposed that in Heb 9:28, the apostle, in speaking about Christ's bearing the sins of many, alludes to the ceremony of the scape goat. This mysterious sacrifice was to be presented to God, Lev 16:7, and the sins of the people were to be confessed over the head of it, Lev 16:21, and after this the goat was dismissed into a land uninhabited, laden, as the institution implied, with the sins of the people; and this the word ανενεγκειν, to bear or carry away, seems to imply. So truly as the goat did metaphorically bear away the sins of the many, so truly did Christ literally bear the punishment due to our sins; and in reference to every believer, has so borne them away that they shall never more rise in judgment against him. 3. In Christ's coming, or appearing the second time, it is very probable, as Dr. Doddridge and others have conjectured, that there is an allusion to the return of the high priest from the inner tabernacle; for, after appearing there in the presence of God, and making atonement for the people in the plain dress of an ordinary priest, Lev 16:23, Lev 16:24, he came out arrayed in his magnificent robes, to bless the people, who waited for him in the court of the tabernacle of the congregation. "But there will be this difference," says Dr. Macknight, "between the return of Christ to bless his people, and the return of the high priest to bless the congregation. The latter, after coming out of the most holy place, made a new atonement in his pontifical robes for himself and for the people, Lev 16:24, which showed that the former atonement was not real but typical. Whereas Jesus, after having made atonement, (and presented himself in heaven, before God), will not return to the earth for the purpose of making himself a sacrifice the second time; but having procured an eternal redemption for us, by the sacrifice of himself once offered, he will return for the purpose of declaring to them who wait for him that they are accepted, and of bestowing on them the great blessing of eternal life. This reward he, being surrounded with the glory of the Father, Mat 16:27, will give them in the presence of an assembled universe, both as their King and their Priest. This is the great salvation which Christ came to preach, and which was confirmed to the world by them who heard him: Heb 2:3." Reader, lay this sincerely to heart! 4. The form in which the high priest and the ordinary priests were to bless the people, after burning the incense in the tabernacle, is prescribed, Num 6:23-26. Literally translated from the Hebrew it is as follows, and consists of three parts or benedictions: - 1. May Jehovah bless thee, and preserve thee! 2. May Jehovah cause his face to shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee! 3. May Jehovah lift up his faces upon thee, and may he put prosperity unto thee! (See my notes on the place, Num 6:23-26.) We may therefore say that Christ, our High Priest, came to bless each of us, by turning us away from our iniquity. And let no one ever expect to see him at his second coming with joy, unless he have, in this life, been turned away from his iniquity, and obtained remission of all his sins, and that holiness without which none can see God. Reader, the time of his reappearing is, to thee, at hand! Prepare to meet thy God! On the word conscience, which occurs so often in this chapter, and in other parts of this epistle, see the observations at the end of chap. 13.”

“To exhaust the sins of many. That is, of all, according to the style of the Scriptures. When he came first, he took upon him the load of our sins; but at his second coming, at the end of the world, he will come in a quite different manner, not as laden with our sins, not after the similitude of a sinful man, not to redeem us, but with great power and majesty to judge all men. (Witham) — To exhaust. That is, to empty or draw out to the very bottom, by a plentiful and perfect redemption. (Challoner)”

“Christ--Greek, "THE Christ"; the representative MAN; representing all men, as the first Adam did. once offered--not "often," Heb 9:25; just as "men," of whom He is the representative Head, are appointed by God once to die. He did not need to die again and again for each individual, or each successive generation of men, for He represents all men of every age, and therefore needed to die but once for all, so as to exhaust the penalty of death incurred by all. He was offered by the Father, His own "eternal Spirit" (Heb 9:14) concurring; as Abraham spared not Isaac, but offered him, the son himself unresistingly submitting to the father's will (Gen. 22:1-24). to bear the sins--referring to Isa 53:12, "He bare the sins of many," namely, on Himself; so "bear" means, Lev 24:15; Num 5:31; Num 14:34. The Greek is literally "to bear up" (Pe1 2:24). "Our sins were laid on Him. When, therefore, He was lifted up on the cross, He bare up our sins along with Him" [BENGEL]. many--not opposed to all, but to few. He, the One, was offered for many; and that once for all (compare Mat 20:28). look for him--with waiting expectation even unto the end (so the Greek). It is translated "wait for" in Rom 8:19, Rom 8:23; Co1 1:7, which see. appear--rather, as Greek, "be seen." No longer in the alien "form of a servant," but in His own proper glory. without sin--apart from, separate from, sin. Not bearing the sin of many on Him as at His first coming (even then there was no sin in Him). That sin has been at His first coming once for all taken away, so as to need no repetition of His sin offering of Himself (Heb 9:26). At His second coming He shall have no more to do with sin. unto salvation--to bring in completed salvation; redeeming then the body which is as yet subject to the bondage of corruption. Hence, in Phi 3:20 he says, "we look for THE SAVIOUR." Note, Christ's prophetical office, as the divine Teacher, was especially exercised during His earthly ministry; His priestly is now from His first to His second coming; His kingly office shall be fully manifested at, and after, His second coming. Next: Hebrews Chapter 10”