Now when Job’s three friends heard all the evil that had befallen him, they came every one from his own place, Alphas the Themanite, and Baldad the Suhite, and Sophar the Naamathite. For they had made an appointment to come together and visit him, and comfort him.

“HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION. Now when Job's three friends heard of all this evil that was come upon him, they came everyone from his own place; Eliphaz the Temanite, and Bildad the Shuhite, and Zophar the Naamathite: for they had made an appointment together to come to mourn with him and to comfort him. We have it proved to us how great a love they entertained both for each other, and for the smitten man, in that they came by agreement to administer consolation to him when afflicted. Though even by this circumstance, viz. that Scripture bears witness they were the friends of so great a man, it is made appear that they were men of a good spirit and right intention; though this very intention of mind, when they break forth into words, upon indiscretion arising, becomes clouded in the sight of the strict Judge. ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION. Now when Job's three friends heard of all this evil that was come upon him, they came everyone from his own place; Eliphaz the Temanite, and Bildad the Shuhite, and Zophar the Naamathite. In the Preface to this work we said that the friends of blessed Job, though they come together to him with a good purpose, yet do for this reason bear the likeness of heretics, in that they fall away into sin by speaking without discretion; and hence it is said to them by blessed Job, Surely I would speak to the Almighty, I desire to reason with God; but ye are forgers of lies, and followers of corrupt doctrines. Thus Holy Church, which is set in the midst of tribulation all this time of her pilgrimage, whilst she suffers wounds, and mourns over the downfall of her members, has other enemies of Christ besides to bear with, under Christ's name. For to the increasing of her grief, heretics also meet together in dispute and strife, and they pierce her with unreasonable words like as with a kind of dart. And it is well said, they came every one from his own place. For 'the place' of heretics is very pride itself. For except they first swelled with pride in their hearts, they would never enter the lists of false assertion. For the place of the wicked is pride, just as reversely humility is 'the place' of the good. Whereof Solomon saith, If the spirit of the ruler rise up against thee, leave not thy place. As though he said in plain words, 'If thou perceivest the spirit of the Tempter to prevail against thee in aught, quit not the lowliness of penitence;' and that it was the abasement of penitence that he called 'our place,' he shews by the words that follow, saying, for healing pacifieth great offences. For what else is the humility of mourning, save the remedy of sin. Heretics therefore come each from 'his place,' in that it is from pride that they are urged to attack Holy Church. And their froward conduct, moreover, is collected from an interpretation of their names. For they are named 'Eliphaz,' 'Baldad,' 'Sophar;' and as we have said above Eliphaz is, by interpretation, rendered, 'contempt of God.' For if they did not condemn God, they would never entertain wrong notions concerning Him. And Baldad is rendered 'oldness alone.' For while they shrink from being fairly defeated, and seek to be victorious with froward purpose, they pay no regard to the conversation of the new life, and all that they give heed to is 'of oldness alone.' And Sophar, 'dissipating prospect;' for they that are set in Holy Church humbly contemplate with true faith the mysteries of their Redeemer, but when heretics come to them with false statements, they 'dissipate the prospect,' in that they turn aside from the aim of right contemplation the minds of those, whom they draw over to themselves. Now the places from whence they come are described in fitting accordance with the practices of heretics. For there is a Themanite, and a Suhite, and a Naamathite named. Now Thema is by interpretation 'the south;' Suhi, 'speaking;' Naama, 'comeliness.' But who does not know that the south is a hot wind; so heretics, as they are over ardent to be wise, study to have heated wits beyond what needs. For sloth goes with the torpor of cold, whilst reversely the restlessness of unrestrained curiosity accords with unabated teeming heat, and so because they long to feel the heat of wisdom beyond what they ought, they are said to come from 'the south.' Paul busied himself to cool the minds of the faithful to this heat of unrestrained wiseness, when he said, Not to be overwise beyond what he ought to be wise, but to be wise unto sobriety. It is hence that David smites at the valleys of salt, viz. in that our Redeemer, by the piercing of His severity, extinguishes the foolishness of unrestrained wit in all that entertain wrong notions regarding Him. And Suhi is rendered 'talking,' for they desire to be warm-witted, not that they may live well, but that they may talk high; thus they are said to come from Thema and Suhi, i.e. from 'heat,' and 'talkativeness,' for herein, viz. that they shew themselves as studious of Scripture, they teem with words of talkativeness, but not with bowels of love. And Naama is interpreted 'comeliness,' for because they aim not to be, but to appear learned, by words of deep learning they put on the guise of well living, and by their teeming wit in talk, exhibit in themselves a form of 'comeliness,' that by the comeliness of the lips they may more easily recommend evil counsels, in proportion as they commonly hide from our senses the foulness of their lives. But neither are the very names of the places set down in undistinguished order in the relation. For Thema is set first, then Suhi, and next Naama in that first an excessive warmth of wit sets them on fire, next smartness of speech lifts them up, and then, finally, dissimulation presents them comely to the eyes of men. For they had made an appointment together to come and mourn with him and to comfort him. Heretics 'make an appointment together,' when they hold in common certain false opinions contrary to the Church, and in the points wherein they are at variance with the truth agree together in falsehood. But all they that give us instruction concerning eternity, what else are they doing, save amid the tribulations of our pilgrimage administering consolation to us? And forasmuch as heretics desire to impart to Holy Church their own opinions, they come to her as though to comfort her. Nor is it strange if they who set forth a figure of enemies, are called friends, when it is said to the very traitor, Friend, wherefore art thou come? and the rich man that is consumed in the fire of hell, is called son by Abraham. For though the wicked refuse to be amended by us, yet it is meet that we style them friends, not of their wickedness, but by virtue of our own lovingkindness. MORAL INTERPRETATION. For they had made an appointment together to come to mourn with him and to comfort him. Yet it very often happens, that whilst we are striving to stay ourselves in this fight of temptation by exalted virtues, certain vices cloak themselves to our eyes under the garb of virtues, and come to us as it were with a smooth face, but how adverse to us they are we perceive upon examination. And hence the friends of blessed Job as it were come together for the purpose of giving comfort, but they burst out into reviling, in that vices that plot our ruin assume the look of virtues, but strike us with hostile assault. For often immoderate anger desires to appear justice, and often dissolute remissness, mercy; often fear without precaution would seem humility, often unbridled pride, liberty. Thus the friends come to give consolation, but fall off into words of reproach, in that vices, cloaked under the guise of virtues, set out indeed with a smooth outside, but confound us by a bitter hostility. For vices make an appointment together under the cloak of virtues; in that there are certain ones, which are banded together against us by a kind of agreement, such as pride and anger, remissness and fear. For anger is neighbour to pride, and remissness to cowardice. Those then come together by agreement, which are allied to one another in opposition to us, by a kind of kinship in iniquity; but if we acknowledge the toilsomeness of our captivity, if we grieve in our inmost soul from love of our eternal home, the sins that steal upon the inopportunely joyful, will not be able to prevail against the opportunely sad.”

“And it came to pass on a certain day, etc. Since there is a threefold good of man, namely of the soul, of the body, and of external things, they are ordered to one another in this way: that the body is for the sake of the soul, while external things are for the sake of both the body and the soul. Therefore, just as it is a perverse intention if someone orders the goods of the soul to the prosperity of external goods, so too it is a perverse intention if someone orders the goods of the soul to the health of the body. And indeed that Job abounded in acts of virtue, which are goods of the soul, could be sensibly manifest to all, whence also the Lord had said above to Satan: "Hast thou considered my servant Job," etc. But Satan brought a slander, as though Job aimed at acts of virtue for the sake of temporal goods — just as evil men, of whom Satan is the prince, perniciously judge the intention of good men; but this slander was refuted by the fact that after the loss of external goods he still remained steadfast in virtue, from which it was sufficiently shown that his intention was not bent toward external goods. It remained, therefore, for the perfect demonstration of Job's virtue, to show that his intention was not bent even toward the health of his own body; and therefore the divine judgment is again brought in, by which this is made manifest: this, then, is what is said: "And it came to pass on a certain day, when the sons of God came and stood before the Lord, that Satan also came among them and stood in his sight, that the Lord said to Satan: Whence comest thou?" Since these words have been expounded above, one need not dwell on them longer, except that this should be noted: that on account of another deed another day is here introduced, just as at the beginning of Genesis, according to the different kinds of things being instituted, different days are described. What Satan, being examined, answered is shown next when it is said: "Who answering said: I have gone round about the earth, and walked through it." And this is as above. And again the Lord sets before him, as it were conspicuously, the virtue of Job, as above; whence it follows: "And the Lord said to Satan: Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a simple and upright man, and fearing God, and avoiding evil?" But because a certain virtue of blessed Job had now been manifested which had not been manifest before — namely, constancy in adversity — therefore he now adds "and still," that is, after the loss of temporal goods, "he retaineth his innocence"; from which the Lord further shows that Satan's suspicion was slanderous and his intention frustrated, whence it follows: "And thou hast moved me against him, that I should afflict him without cause." Now from what is said, "thou hast moved me against him," it is not to be understood that God is provoked by someone to will what he did not will before, as is customary among men — for it is said, Numbers 23:19, "God is not as a man, that he should lie, nor as the son of man, that he should be changed" — but Scripture here speaks of God figuratively, in human fashion: for men, when they wish to do something on account of someone, are said to be moved by that person; but God indeed wills to do — as he also does — this on account of that, yet without any commotion of mind, because from eternity he had in mind what he was going to do, and on account of what. The Lord, therefore, had disposed from eternity to afflict Job temporally, in order to demonstrate the truth of his virtue, so that every slander of the malicious might be excluded; whence, to signify this, it is here said: "And thou hast moved me against him." But what is said — "that I should afflict him without cause" — is to be understood with respect to Satan's intention, not with respect to God's intention: for Satan had sought Job's adversity, intending thereby to lead him into impatience and blasphemy, which he had not achieved; but God had permitted this in order to make manifest his virtue, which had indeed come about. Thus, then, Job was afflicted in vain with respect to Satan's intention, but not with respect to God's intention. But Satan, having been repulsed, does not rest, but still contrives a slander, wishing to show that all the good things Job had done, and even this very fact that he had patiently borne adversities, he had done not for love of God but for the health of his own body; whence it follows: "And Satan answering him said: Skin for skin, and all that a man hath he will give for his soul." Now it must be considered that Job had been afflicted in two ways: namely, in the loss of his possessions, and in the loss of his children. Satan, therefore, means to say that Job had patiently borne both afflictions for the health of his own body, and that this was not a matter of great virtue but was human and customary among men; and this is what he means by "man" — as if to say, whoever, even one not virtuous, will easily give skin for skin, that is, another's flesh for his own flesh: for a man not virtuous endures that anyone else, however closely joined to him, be afflicted in body rather than himself; and likewise any man will give all the external things he possesses for his soul, that is, for the preservation of his life: for external goods are sought for the preservation of life, that they may serve as an aid for food and clothing and other such things by which a man's life is conveniently preserved. And because someone might say to Satan: whence can it be proved that Job bore the loss of his children and possessions patiently out of fear for his own skin and his own life? As if answering this question, he adds "but otherwise" — that is, if his bare word is not believed — "put forth thy hand," that is, exercise thy power, "and touch his bone and his flesh," that is, afflict him in body, not only on the surface, which could be signified by the touching of the flesh, but also in depth, which is signified by the touching of the bone, so that the touch may reach even to the innermost parts; "and then thou shalt see," that is, it will be able to be manifestly beheld by all, "that he will curse thee to thy face," which is to be expounded as above. The Lord, therefore, willed to show that Job had not served God for the health of his body, just as he had shown above that he did not serve him for external goods; whence it is added: "The Lord therefore said to Satan: Behold, he is in thy hand" — that is, I hand over to thee the power of afflicting him in body — "but yet save his life" — that is, do not take his life from him. For God does not expose his servants totally to Satan's will, but according to a fitting measure, according to that saying of the Apostle, 1 Corinthians 10:13: "God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able." "So Satan went out," etc. Having received the power, Satan proceeds to its execution; whence it is said: "So Satan going forth from the presence of the Lord, struck Job" — with a blow indeed foul and abominable, whence it is called "a sore"; incurable and painful, whence it is called "grievous"; and universal, whence it is said "from the sole of the foot even to the top of his head." Now the afflictions of the sick are usually relieved by remedies applied externally and by comforts, but Job was not relieved in this way, for it follows: "who scraped the corrupt matter with a potsherd," in which it is shown that soothing and delicate medicaments were not applied to him; "sitting on a dunghill," from which it is shown that he was refreshed neither by the pleasantness of the place, nor by the softness of bedding, nor by the odor of any sweetness, but rather made use of their contraries. Now this can have happened in two ways: either because, being struck by the Lord, he himself further afflicted and humbled himself of his own accord, that he might the more easily obtain mercy; or because he had lost everything he had, whence he could not procure fitting remedies for himself; and this is sufficiently probable from what the Lord said above; nor does it appear that Satan did anything to harm him beyond the power given to him. Also, the afflictions of men are usually relieved by consoling words, but to the afflicted Job words of exasperation are spoken, the more provoking the more closely joined the person is who utters them; for it follows: "And his wife said to him" — whom alone the Devil had left him, that through her he might assail the mind of the just man, he who had cast down the first man through a woman. She, however, first broke out into words of mockery, saying: "Dost thou still continue in thy simplicity?" — as if to say: at least after so many scourges you ought to recognize that it was useless for you to keep your simplicity, just as also it is said in the person of certain men, Malachi 3:14: "He is vain that serveth God, and what profit is it that we have kept his commandments?" Second, she proceeds to words of perverse suggestion, saying: "Bless God" — that is, curse — as if to say: since adversity has come upon you while you blessed God, curse God, that you may obtain prosperity. Finally, she concludes with words of despair, saying: "and die," as if to say: consider yourself as good as dead, for nothing remains for you, remaining in your simplicity, except to die. Or, taken otherwise: "bless God and die," that is, since after such reverence toward God you have been afflicted with adversity in this way, if you still bless God nothing remains but for you to await death. But the holy man, who had patiently borne his own misfortunes, could not bear an injury to God; for it follows: "Who said to her: Thou hast spoken like one of the foolish women." Rightly does he accuse her of folly, since she spoke against divine wisdom. That she had spoken foolishly he shows: "If we have received good things at the hand of the Lord, why should we not receive evil?" In which he teaches the perfect wisdom of man. For since temporal and bodily goods are not to be loved except for the sake of spiritual and eternal goods, then, provided these latter — the more principal ones — are safe, a man ought not to be cast down if he be deprived of the former, nor be elated if he abound in them. Job therefore teaches us to have such constancy of soul that we both make use of temporal goods, if they are given to us by God, in such a way that we are not thereby lifted up into pride, and endure the contrary evils in such a way that our soul is not thereby cast down, according to that saying of the Apostle, Philippians (last chapter): "I know both how to be brought low, and I know how to abound," and afterward, "I can do all things in him who strengtheneth me." Then Job's perseverance in innocence is concluded when it is said: "In all these things Job did not sin with his lips." Not only through his wife did the Devil strive to exasperate the mind of blessed Job, but also through his friends, who, although they came to console him, nevertheless proceeded to words of rebuke; of whom it is said: "So the three friends of Job, hearing of all the evil that had befallen him, came, each one from his own place: Eliphaz the Themanite, and Baldad the Suhite, and Sophar the Naamathite." And because almost the whole disputation of this book turns among these men, it must be considered that these three were, in some respect, of the same opinion as Job — whence they are called his friends — and in some respect differed from him, while agreeing with one another — whence they are numbered together with one another and distinguished from Job. They agreed with Job, indeed, that not only natural things but also human affairs are subject to divine providence; but they differed from him in that they thought that man is rewarded by God with earthly prosperity for the good things he does, and punished by God with temporal adversity for the evil things he does, as though temporal goods were the rewards of virtues and temporal evils were the proper penalties of sins. Now each of them strives to defend this opinion in his own manner, according to what his own particular disposition suggested to him; on account of which they are said to have come "each one from his own place." Job, however, was not of this opinion, but believed that the good works of men are ordered to a future spiritual reward after this life, and likewise that sins are to be punished by future punishments. That the aforesaid friends of Job came to console him is shown by what follows: "For they had made an appointment to come together, to visit him and to comfort him," in which they showed themselves true friends, not failing him in tribulations; for it is said, Ecclesiasticus 12:9, "a friend is known in distress and in the evil day of a man." And first indeed the very visitation was consoling: for to see a friend and to live together with him is most delightful. They also console him by deeds, showing him signs of their compassion. Before these signs of compassion, that which provokes compassion is set forth, when it is said: "And when they had lifted up their eyes afar off, they knew him not": for his face was changed by the sore, and his dress and the rest of his attire by the loss of his goods; and what he says, "afar off," is to be understood according to that measure by which a man can be recognized from a distance. This change in their friend provoked them to sorrow and compassion, which they showed through signs; for it follows: "and crying out," that is, on account of the greatness of their grief, "they wept, and rending their garments, they sprinkled dust upon their heads" as a sign of humility and dejection, as it were accounting themselves cast down by the dejection of their friend. He adds, moreover, "toward heaven," as though by this humiliation they might provoke heavenly mercy. It must be considered that the compassion of friends is consoling, either because adversity, like a certain burden, is borne more lightly when it is carried by several, or rather because all sadness is relieved by an admixture of delight: and it is most delightful to take proof of someone's friendship, which is above all taken from compassion in adversities, and therefore it brings consolation. Now they consoled him not only by the compassion shown, but also by rendering him companionship; for it follows: "and they sat with him on the ground seven days and seven nights"; it is to be understood, however, not continuously but at fitting hours, for so great a sorrow needed a lasting consolation. But the third thing, which is above all consoling — namely, speech — they did not render; for it follows: "and no man spoke a word to him." The reason for their silence is shown when it is added: "for they saw that his grief was very great" — which reason is given more according to the opinion of the ones consoling than according to the true state of the afflicted man; for when someone's mind has been absorbed by grief, it does not receive words of consolation, whence also the poet says: "Who but one lacking sense forbids a mother to weep at the funeral of her son?" Job, however, was not so disposed that he could not receive consolation on account of his sorrow, but rather he himself, according to reason, consoled himself, as appears from his words adduced above.”

“We have here an account of the kind visit which Job's three friends paid him in his affliction. The news of his extraordinary troubles spread into all parts, he being an eminent man both for greatness and goodness, and the circumstances of his troubles being very uncommon. Some, who were his enemies, triumphed in his calamities, Job 16:10; Job 19:18; Job 30:1, etc. Perhaps they made ballads on him. But his friends concerned themselves for him, and endeavoured to comfort him. A friend loveth at all times, and a brother is born for adversity. Three of them are here named (Job 2:11), Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar. We shall afterwards meet with a fourth, who it should seem was present at the whole conference, namely, Elihu. Whether he came as a friend of Job or only as an auditor does not appear. These three are said to be his friends, his intimate acquaintance, as David and Solomon had each of them one in their court that was called the king's friend. These three were eminently wise and good men, as appears by their discourses. They were old men, very old, had a great reputation for knowledge, and much deference was paid to their judgment, Job 32:6. It is probable that they were men of figure in their country-princes, or heads of houses. Now observe, I. That Job, in his prosperity, had contracted a friendship with them. If they were his equals, yet he had not that jealousy of them - if his inferiors, yet he had not that disdain of them, which was any hindrance to an intimate converse and correspondence with them. to have such friends added more to his happiness in the day of his prosperity than all the head of cattle he was master of. Much of the comfort of this life lies in acquaintance and friendship with those that are prudent and virtuous; and he that has a few such friends ought to value them highly. Job's three friends are supposed to have been all of them of the posterity of Abraham, which, for some descents, even in the families that were shut out from the covenant of peculiarity, retained some good fruits of that pious education which the father of the faithful gave to those under his charge. Eliphaz descended from Teman, the grandson of Esau (Gen 36:11), Bildad (it is probable) from Shuah, Abraham's son by Keturah, Gen 25:2. Zophar is thought by some to be the same with Zepho, a descendant from Esau, Gen 26:11. The preserving of so much wisdom and piety among those that were strangers to the covenants of promise was a happy presage of God's grace to the Gentiles, when the partition-wall should in the latter days be taken down. Esau was rejected; yet many that came from him inherited some of the best blessings. II. That they continued their friendship with Job in his adversity, when most of his friends had forsaken him, Job 19:14. In two ways they showed their friendship: - 1. By the kind visit they paid him in his affliction, to mourn with him and to comfort him, Job 2:11. Probably they had been wont to visit him in his prosperity, not to hunt or hawk with him, not to dance or play at cards with him, but to entertain and edify themselves with his learned and pious converse; and now that he was in adversity they come to share with him in his griefs, as formerly they had come to share with him in his comforts. These were wise men, whose heart was in the house of mourning, Ecc 7:4. Visiting the afflicted, sick or sore, fatherless or childless, in their sorrow, is made a branch of pure religion and undefiled (Jam 1:27), and, if done from a good principle, will be abundantly recompensed shortly, Mat 25:36. (1.) By visiting the sons and daughters of affliction we may contribute to the improvement, [1.] Of our own graces; for many a good lesson is to be learned from the troubles of others; we may look upon them and receive instruction, and be made wise and serious. [2.] Of their comforts. By putting a respect upon them we encourage them, and some good word may be spoken to them which may help to make them easy. Job's friends came, not to satisfy their curiosity with an account of his troubles and the strangeness of the circumstances of them, much less, as David's false friends, to make invidious remarks upon him (Psa 41:6-8), but to mourn with him, to mingle their tears with his, and so to comfort him. It is much more pleasant to visit those in affliction to whom comfort belongs than those to whom we must first speak conviction. (2.) Concerning these visitants observe, [1.] That they were not sent for, but came of their own accord (Job 6:22), whence Mr. Caryl observes that it is good manners to be an unbidden guest at the house of mourning, and, in comforting our friends, to anticipate their invitations. [2.] That they made an appointment to come. Note, Good people should make appointments among themselves for doing good, so exciting and binding one another to it, and assisting and encouraging one another in it. For the carrying on of any pious design let hand join in hand. [3.] That they came with a design (and we have reason to think it was a sincere design) to comfort him, and yet proved miserable comforters, through their unskilful management of his case. Many that aim well do, by mistake, come short of their aim. 2. By their tender sympathy with him and concern for him in his affliction. When they saw him at some distance he was so disfigured and deformed with his sores that they knew him not, Job 2:12. His face was foul with weeping (Job 16:16), like Jerusalem's Nazarites, which had been ruddy as the rubies, but were now blacker than a coal, Lam 4:7, Lam 4:8. What a change will a sore disease, or, without that, oppressing care and grief, make in the countenance, in a little time! Is this Naomi? Rut 1:19. So, Is this Job? How hast thou fallen! How is thy glory stained and sullied, and all thy honour laid in the dust! God fits us for such changes! Observing him thus miserably altered, they did not leave him, in a fright or loathing, but expressed so much the more tenderness towards him. (1.) Coming to mourn with him, they vented their undissembled grief in all the then usual expressions of that passion. They wept aloud; the sight of them (as is usual) revived Job's grief, and set him a weeping afresh, which fetched floods of tears from their eyes. They rent their clothes, and sprinkled dust upon their heads, as men that would strip themselves, and abase themselves, with their friend that was stripped and abased. (2.) Coming to comfort him, they sat down with him upon the ground, for so he received visits; and they, not in compliment to him, but in true compassion, put themselves into the same humble and uneasy place and posture. They had many a time, it is likely, sat with him on his couches and at his table, in his prosperity, and were therefore willing to share with him in his grief and poverty because they had shared with him in his joy and plenty. It was not a modish short visit that they made him, just to look upon him and be gone; but, as those that could have had no enjoyment of themselves if they had returned to their place while their friend was in so much misery, they resolved to stay with him till they saw him mend or end, and therefore took lodgings near him, though he was not now able to entertain them as he had done, and they must therefore bear their own charges. Every day, for seven days together, at the house in which he admitted company, they came and sat with him, as his companions in tribulation, and exceptions from that rule, Nullus ad amissas ibit amicus opes - Those who have lost their wealth are not to expect the visits of their friends. They sat with him, but none spoke a word to him, only they all attended to the particular narratives he gave of his troubles. They were silent, as men astonished and amazed. Curae leves loquuntur, ingentes stupent - Our lighter griefs have a voice; those which are more oppressive are mute. So long a time they held their peace, to show A reverence due to such prodigious woe. - Sir R. Blackmore They spoke not a word to him, whatever they said one to another, by way of instruction, for the improvement of the present providence. They said nothing to that purport to which afterwards they said much - nothing to grieve him (Job 4:2), because they saw his grief was very great already, and they were loth at first to add affliction to the afflicted. There is a time to keep silence, when either the wicked is before us, and by speaking we may harden them (Psa 39:1), or when by speaking we may offend the generation of God's children, Psa 73:15. Their not entering upon the following solemn discourses till the seventh day may perhaps intimate that it was the sabbath day, which doubtless was observed in the patriarchal age, and to that day they adjourned the intended conference, because probably then company resorted, as usual, to Job's house, to join with him in his devotions, who might be edified by the discourse. Or, rather, by their silence so long they would intimate that what they afterwards said was well considered and digested and the result of many thoughts. The heart of the wise studies to answer. We should think twice before we speak once, especially in such a case as this, think long, and we shall be the better able to speak short and to the purpose.”

“And when they lifted up their eyes afar off,.... Either when at some distance from Job's house, and he being without in the open air, as some think; or as they entered his house, he being at the further part of the room, or in another further on, which they could see into: and knew him not; at first sight; until they came nearer to him, his garments being rent, and his head shaved, and his body covered all over with boils; so that he was so deformed and disfigured that they could not know him at first, and could scarcely believe him to be the same person: they lifted up their voice and wept: they wept and cried aloud, being greatly affected with the sight of him, and their hearts sympathizing with him under his afflictions, being his cordial friends, and of that disposition, to weep with those that weep: and they rent everyone his mantle, or "cloak"; in token of mourning, as Job had done before; see Gill on Job 1:20, and sprinkled dust upon their heads towards heaven; that is, they took up handfuls of dust from off the ground, and threw it up in the air over their heads, which fell upon them and covered them; which was another rite or ceremony used by mourners, as Jarchi observes, and showed the vehemence of their affections and passions, and the confusion they were in at seeing their friend in such a miserable condition; see Jos 7:6.”

“Eliphaz--The view of RAWLINSON that "the names of Job's three friends represent the Chaldean times, about 700 B.C.," cannot be accepted. Eliphaz is an Idumean name, Esau's oldest son (Gen 36:4); and Teman, son of Eliphaz (Gen 36:15), called "duke." EUSEBIUS places Teman in Arabia-PetrÃ&brvbra (but see on Job 6:19). Teman means "at the right hand"; and then the south, namely, part of Idumea; capital of Edom (Amo 1:12). Hebrew geographers faced the east, not the north as we do; hence with them "the right hand" was the south. Temanites were famed for wisdom (Jer 49:7). BARUCH mentions them as "authors of fables" (namely, proverbs embodying the results of observation), and "searchers out of understanding." Bildad the Shuhite--Shuah ("a pit"), son of Abraham and Keturah (Gen 25:2). PTOLEMY mentions the region Syccea, in Arabia-Deserta, east of Batanea. Zophar the Naamathite--not of the Naamans in Judah (Jos 15:41), which was too distant; but some region in Arabia-Deserta. FRETELIUS says there was a Naamath in Uz.”

“After the sixth temptation there comes a seventh; and now the real conflict begins, through which the hero of the book passes, not indeed without sinning, but still triumphantly. 11 When Job's three friends heard of all this evil that was come upon him, they came every one from his own place; Eliphaz from Teman, and Bildad from Shuach, and Zophar from Naama: for they had made an appointment to come together to go and sympathize with him, and comfort him. אליפז is, according to Gen 36, an old Idumaean name (transposed = Phasal in the history of the Herodeans; according to Michaelis, Suppl. p. 87; cui Deus aurum est, comp. Job 22:25), and תּימן a district of Idumaea, celebrated for its native wisdom (Jer 49:7; Bar. 3:22f.). But also in East-Hauran a Tm is still found (described by Wetzstein in his Bericht ber seine Reise in den beiden Trachonen und um das Hauran-Gebirge, Zeitschr. fr allg. Erdkunde, 1859), and about fifteen miles south of Tm, a Bzn suggestive of Elihu's surname (comp. Jer 25:23). שׁוּח we know only from Gen 25 as the son of Abraham and Keturah, who settled in the east country. Accordingly it must be a district of Arabia lying not very far from Idumaea: it might be compared with trans-Hauran Schakka, though the sound, however, of the word makes it scarcely admissible, which is undoubtedly one and the same with Dakkai'a, east from Batanaea, mentioned in Ptolem. v. 15. נעמה is a name frequent in Syria and Palestine: there is a town of the Jewish Shephla (the low ground by the Mediterranean) of this name, Jos 15:41, which, however, can hardly be intended here. הבּאה is Milel, consequently third pers. with the art. instead of the relative pron. (as, besides here, Gen 18:21; Gen 46:27), vid., Ges. 109 ad init. The Niph. נועד is strongly taken by some expositors as the same meaning with נועץ, to confer with, appoint a meeting: it signifies, to assemble themselves, to meet in an appointed place at an appointed time (Neh 6:2). Reports spread among the mounted tribes of the Arabian desert with the rapidity of telegraphic despatches.”