Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.

“(Hom. lxxxvi) Some say that by breathing He did not give them the Spirit, but made them meet to receive the Spirit. For if Daniel’s senses were so overpowered by the sight of the Angel, how would they have been overwhelmed in receiving that unutterable gift, if He had not first prepared them for it! It would not be wrong however to say that they received then the gift of a certain spiritual power, not to raise the dead and do miracles, but to remit sins: Whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them, and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained.”

“Having set forth the appearances of Christ made to the women, in this part the Evangelist deals with the appearances made to the apostles: first, the appearance in which he appeared to all of them together in Jerusalem, Thomas being absent; second, the one which took place with Thomas present, where it says "and after eight days," etc.; third, the one which was made to certain of them specially beside the sea, where in chapter 21 he later "manifested himself," etc. Concerning the first, two things are set down: first, the Lord's appearance; second, the disciples' doubt, where it says "But Thomas," etc. Concerning the first, three things are set down: first, the Lord's appearance; second, the enjoining of an office, where it says "He said to them, Peace be with you," etc.; third, the conferring of a spiritual gift, where it says "When he had said this, he breathed on them," etc. Concerning the first he does three things: first, he sets down the circumstances of the appearance; second, the substance of the appearance, where it says "Jesus came," etc.; third, the consequence of the appearance, where it says "the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord." He describes, then, the Lord's appearance to the disciples by four circumstances: first, from the description of the hour, since "when it was evening"; second, from the designation of the day, since "on that day"; third, from the condition of the place, since "when the doors were shut"; fourth, from the disposition of the disciples, since "they were gathered together for fear of the Jews." The hour of the appearance, then, was evening; of this there is a twofold literal reason. One, because he wished to appear to all at once; and therefore he waited until evening, so that those who had been scattered during the day might come together at evening, for at night they were together. The other reason is that the Lord appeared to them in order to comfort them. He therefore chose that hour in which, being more stupefied, they had greater need of comfort: and this is the evening. Psalm 45:2: "A helper in the tribulations that have found us exceedingly." There is also a mystical reason, namely that the Lord will appear to the faithful at the end of the world, when at midnight the cry will be made: "Behold, the bridegroom comes," about to render them their reward; Matthew 20:8: "When evening was come, the lord of the vineyard said to his steward: Call the laborers, and pay them their reward." The day of the appearance was the very day of the resurrection, since "on that day, the first of the sabbaths," that is, the Lord's day, of which it was said above (in this chapter), "now on the first day of the week." Why it is called "the first of the sabbaths" has already been said. It can be gathered from the Gospels that the Lord appeared five times on that day: twice to women, namely once to Mary Magdalene alone, of whom mention was made immediately above, and again together with the other women as they were returning; and then they came up and took hold of his feet. Third, he appeared to two disciples on that same day as they were going to Emmaus, Luke 24:13. Fourth, to Simon Peter; but when, and how, and where, is not expressed, except only that he appeared. Luke 24:34: "The Lord has truly risen, and has appeared to Simon." Fifth, he appeared to all of them gathered together at evening, as is related here. And therefore it is sung: "This is the day which the Lord has made: let us be glad and rejoice in it": Psalm 118:24. By this it is given to be understood that on the day of the common resurrection he will appear manifestly to all — to women, to sinners, to wayfarers, to apostles, and to apostolic men — for "every eye shall see him, and they also that pierced him": Apocalypse 1:7. The condition of the place, however, is described by its being shut up, a condition of doubt and fear, since "the doors were shut": literally, on account of the lateness of the hour, because it was night, and on account of fear of the Jews. But on Christ's part, the reason for the closed doors was that he might manifest to them the power of his might by entering to them while the doors were shut. It must be known concerning this, that according to some, to enter with the doors shut belongs to a property of a glorified body, which they say, by reason of a certain condition inherent in it, can be together with another body at once in the same place, insofar as it is glorified; and that this both took place and can take place without a miracle. But this cannot stand, because the fact that a non-glorified human body cannot be together with another body at once belongs to it from its nature. It is necessary, then, if a glorified body is said to have in itself some inherent property by which it can be together with another body in the same place, that there be excluded from it that property by which it is now prevented from being together with another. But this property is in no way separable or destructible from the body, since it is not, as they themselves say, a mathematical corporeality, but the very dimensions of the quantified body, to which position properly belongs as an accident. Whence the Philosopher argues against those who posit Ideas and separated matters. And that even granted that the whole space above the earth were void, a sensible body still could not be together with them, on account of the dimensions of quantity. But by no property of a glorified body could the dimensions be removed from the body, the nature of the body remaining. And therefore it must be said that Christ did this miraculously by the power of his divinity; and whenever something similar should occur in the saints, it would be miraculous, and comes about through a new miracle. And this Augustine and Gregory expressly say. For Augustine says: "You ask how he could enter through closed doors? If you comprehend the manner, it is not a miracle. Where reason fails, there is the edification of faith"; and he adds: "For he was indeed able to enter without their being opened, he at whose birth the virginity of his mother remained inviolate." Just as his birth from a virgin mother was miraculous by the power of his divinity, so was this entrance. Mystically, moreover, it is given to be understood by this that Christ appears to us when the doors — that is, the exterior senses — are shut in prayer, Matthew 6:6: "But when you pray, enter into your chamber"; and at the end of the world, when those who are ready will enter into the wedding feast, and afterward the door will be shut, as is related in Matthew 25:10. The disposition of the disciples is described as one to be imitated, since "they were gathered together"; which indeed is not without mystery. For Christ comes to those who are gathered together, the Holy Spirit descends upon those who are gathered together; because Christ and the Holy Spirit are present only to those gathered together in charity. Matthew 18:20: "Wherever two or three shall be gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." Here the very appearance of Christ is set down as to three things: first, as to the presence of Christ which he displayed; second, as to the greeting which he offered them; third, as to the sure manifestation of himself, which he showed them. Now Christ displayed his presence to them without any doubt, for he "came and stood in the midst of the disciples." He came indeed personally, the very same one, just as he had promised them above, 14:28: "I go, and I come to you." But he "stood in the midst," so that all might recognize him with certainty. Whence the Jews are reproved, who did not recognize him. Above, 1:26: "But there has stood in your midst one whom you do not know." Again, he "stood in the midst" of the disciples, to show the conformity of the human nature which he has to them. Ecclesiasticus 50:13: "Round about him a crown of brethren, like a planting of cedar on Mount Lebanon." Again, he "stood in the midst" by condescension, since he conversed among them as one of them. Ecclesiasticus 32:1: "Have they made you ruler? Be not lifted up: be among them as one of themselves"; Luke 22:27: "But I am in the midst of you as he that serves." Again, to designate that we ought to be in the middle of virtue. Isaiah 30:21: "This is the way, walk in it, and turn not aside to the right hand nor to the left." For he who exceeds in excess turns aside to the right; but he who falls short by defect goes to the left. Now he uttered to them the words of greeting, saying "Peace be with you." But this was necessary, for their peace had been disturbed in many ways: both with regard to God, against whom some of them had sinned by denying him, some by fleeing — Matthew 26:31: "All you shall be scandalized in me this night; for it is written: I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered." And against this he set before them the peace of reconciliation with God; Romans 5:10: "We have been reconciled to God through the death of his Son"; for this he accomplished through his Passion. Again, with regard to themselves: for they were sorrowful, and doubtful in faith; and this peace too, now accomplished, he set before them. Psalm 118:165: "Much peace have they that love your law." Again, with regard to those outside: for they were suffering persecutions from the Jews; and against this he says to them "Peace be with you," namely against the persecutions of the Jews. Above, 14:27: "My peace I give to you, my peace I leave with you." Now he showed them the sure manifestation of himself through his hands and his side; whence it follows, "When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side," because in these especially the signs of his Passion remained. Luke 24:39: "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself." So too will he show himself in glory; above, chapter 14:23: "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word," and further on: "I will manifest myself to him." Here is set down the effect of the appearance, which is joy in the hearts of the disciples at the sight of the Lord — a joy which he had promised them above, chapter 16:22: "But I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice." But this joy will be fulfilled in the homeland — that is, for the good — from the open vision of God. Isaiah 66:14: "You shall see, and your heart shall rejoice, and your bones shall flourish like an herb." He enjoins upon the apostles their office, and first he prefaces it with the bond of peace; second, he enjoins the office, where it says "As the Father has sent me." He said to them, therefore, again, "Peace be with you." He said this to them against a twofold disturbance: for against the present disturbance from the Jews, he first said to them "Peace be with you"; but against the disturbance to be caused by the Gentiles, he said to them again, "Peace be with you." Above, 16:33: "In the world you shall have distress, but in me, peace." For they were to be sent to the Gentiles. And therefore the enjoining of the office is immediately added: "As the Father has sent me, I also send you," in which he shows himself the mediator between God and men. 1 Timothy 2:5: "The mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus," etc. This was for the consolation of the disciples, who, recognizing the authority of Christ, knew that he sent them by divine authority. Again, considering their own dignity, namely that they had the proper office of apostles: for "apostle" is the same as "one sent." He says, then, "As the Father has sent me, I also send you" — that is, as the Father, loving me, sent me into the world to endure the Passion for the salvation of the faithful (above, 3:17: "For God did not send his Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him"), so I, loving you, send you to sustain tribulations for my name's sake. Matthew 10:16: "Behold, I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves." Second, fitness for the office is given to them through the gift of the Holy Spirit. 2 Corinthians 3:6: "Who also has made us fit ministers of the new testament, not in the letter but in the spirit." Whence it follows, "When he had said this, he breathed on them," etc. And concerning this gift, he first prefaces the sign of the gift, which is the breathing upon them; whence he says "he breathed on them." Something similar is found in Genesis 2:7: "He breathed into his face the breath of life" — which the first man corrupted, namely the breath of natural life; but this Christ restored, by giving the Holy Spirit. It is not to be understood that this breath of Christ was the Holy Spirit himself, but a sign of him. Whence Augustine says in Book IV of On the Trinity: "That bodily breath was not the substance of the Holy Spirit, but a demonstration, through a fitting signification, that the Holy Spirit proceeds not only from the Father but also from the Son." It must be noted, however, that upon Christ the Holy Spirit was sent, first, in the form of a dove at the Baptism (above, chapter 3), and in the form of a cloud at the Transfiguration; Matthew 17:5. The reason for this is that the grace of Christ, which is given through the Holy Spirit, had to be derived to us through the propagation of grace in the sacraments; and thus he descended in the form of a dove at the Baptism, which is a fecund animal; and through teaching, and thus he descended in a shining cloud. Whence there too the teacher is pointed out; whence it says, "Hear him." But upon the apostles he first descended in a breath, to designate the propagation of grace in the sacraments, of which they themselves were ministers; whence he says, "Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them." Matthew 28:19: "Going therefore, baptize them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." Second, however, in fiery tongues, to signify the propagation of grace through teaching. Whence Acts 2:4 says that after they were filled with the Holy Spirit, they immediately began to speak. Second, he sets down the words of the giving, saying, "Receive the Holy Spirit." But did they indeed receive the Holy Spirit here? It seems not, because since he had not yet ascended on high, he ought not to have given gifts to men. And indeed, according to Chrysostom, some say that Christ did not here give them the Holy Spirit, but prepared them for the future giving at Pentecost. And they are moved to this because it is said in Daniel 10:8 that he could not sustain the vision of the angel; whence these men, unless prepared, could not have sustained the coming of the Holy Spirit. But nevertheless Chrysostom himself says: the Holy Spirit was given to the disciples not generally for all things, but for a certain effect, namely for the forgiving of sins, as also, per Matthew 10:8, for the working of miracles. But Augustine and Gregory say that the Holy Spirit has two precepts of love, namely of God and of neighbor; and therefore he was first given on earth, to designate the precept of love of neighbor; second, from heaven, to designate the precept of love of God. Third, the fruit of the giving is set down: "Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them" — which is a fitting effect of the Holy Spirit, namely the remission of sins; for he himself is charity, and through him charity is given to us. Romans 5:5: "The charity of God is poured forth in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us." But the remission of sins does not take place except through charity. For "charity covers all offenses"; 1 Peter 4:8: "Charity covers a multitude of sins." Here, then, a question is first raised concerning what he says, "Whose sins you shall forgive," since God alone forgives sins. To this some say that God alone forgives the guilt, but the priest absolves only from the liability to punishment, and declares him absolved from the stain of guilt. But this is not true; for the sacrament of penance, since it is a sacrament of the new law, confers grace, just as it is conferred in Baptism. But in Baptism the priest baptizes instrumentally, and yet grace is conferred: therefore likewise in the sacrament of penance he absolves sacramentally and ministerially from punishment and guilt, insofar as he administers the sacrament in which sins are forgiven. But as for what is said, that God alone forgives sins, this is true with respect to authority. Thus also God alone baptizes; but the priest baptizes ministerially, as has been said. Again, a question is raised concerning what he says, "Receive the Holy Spirit: whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them." It seems, then, that whoever does not have the Holy Spirit cannot forgive sins. To this it must be said that if the remission of sins were the proper work of the priest — that is, if he did this by his own power — then indeed none but a holy man could sanctify. But the remission of sins is the proper work of God, who forgives sins by his own power and authority; whereas it belongs to the priest only as to an instrument. Just as, therefore, a master can, through his servant and minister, whether he be good or bad, accomplish his will in the carrying out of certain things, so too the Lord, through ministers, even if they be evil, can confer the sacraments, in which grace is given. Again, a question is raised concerning what is said, "Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them." To this it must be said that, as has been said, the priest acts in the sacraments as the minister of God. 1 Corinthians 4:1: "Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and the dispensers of the mysteries of God." In the same manner, then, in which God forgives and retains sins, so too does the priest. Now God forgives sins by bestowing grace; but he is said to retain them by not bestowing it, on account of an impediment on the part of the recipient. So too the minister forgives sins insofar as he bestows the sacrament of the Church; and he retains them insofar as he shows some to be unworthy of the reception of the sacraments.”

“■ Whosesoever sins ye remit , they are remitted unto them , VOL. v. 8 r digitized by GOO^IC 274 ana whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained . Calvin twists and turns this to make it mean the preaching of the Gospel, namely, that they to whom ye preach the Gospel, if they believe it, will have their sins forgiven by their mere belief. But every one sees that this explanation is strained, forced, foolish, and ridiculous. For in this way it would not be the Apostles, but believers themselves who would themselves remit their own sins, which is absurd. For no one is judge in his own case, or stands higher than himself, so as to remit his own sins. (2.) These two things, viz., preaching the Gospel and remitting sins, are clearly dissimilar and distinct, the one being the work of an Apostle in preaching, the other the judicial act of a judge. (3.) The Gospel must be preached to all : and consequently this absolution of Calvin's must be given even to all the wicked. But Christ wishes not that all sins should be remitted, but orders that some should be retained, and that the Apostles and their successors should be judges in this matter. (4.) Christ had already given the Apostles power to preach (Luke x. 1), and commanded them to preach to every creature. Why then should He repeat all this in such obscure and unintelligible words ? I say therefore, it is a matter of faith to understand this passage of the sacrament of penance, wherein the priest, as judge, remits not only the punishment but also the guilt of penitents who accuse themselves in confession. This is clear from the words themselves, all’of which signify that a judicial power of remitting or retaining sins was here given to the Apostles as judges in the tribunal of conscience. For so all the Fathers and the whole Church in every age understood the words. See Council of Trent, sess. xiv. can. 3 and 1. Bellarmine quotes the testimonies of the Fathers (JDe Pcenit. iii. 2), and amongst them S. Gregory, who says, “They hold the chief place in the Divine judgment, so as in the place of God to retain some men’s sins, and remit the sins of others.” The meaning then is, “I give you by the Spirit the power of Order, which a man can have even when in sin, and I confer on you at the same time grace and sanctification, to enable you to exercise this power in a worthy and holy manner, not merely for the Google SACRAMENTAL CONFESSION. 2 75 salvation of others, but also for your own. And ye will really remit sins as my ministers, and not merely announce that they arc remitted, and whosesoever sins ye retain, either with some, because they do not come to you, or others because ye will consider them undeserving of absolution, are retained in heaven by God.” You may say, Cyril explains this passage as speaking of the preaching of the Gospel. I reply, Cyril does not explain these latter words, as speaking of the preaching of the Gospel, but the former words, “ As the Father sent Me, even so send I you.” But you will say again, Cyril says that sins are remitted in two ways, by Baptism and repentance. But I reply, “ This is true, but not to the point Christ is properly speaking of the tribunal of Penance, but Cyril extends His words to include Baptism. Christ is here speaking of the judicial remission of sins, which is to be had specially, not in Baptism, but in the sacrament of Penance only.” See S. Chrysostom (Lib. iii. and vi. De Sacerdotid)y where he shows that priests are of higher honour than not only kings but even angels, who have not the power of remitting sins. Moreover, Christ by here instituting the tribunal of Penance, sanctioned, in this very way, Sacramental Confession, and enjoins it by Divine right. For sins cannot be remitted in this tribunal unless they are known, nor can they be known, unless they are confessed, for they are frequently secret ; nay more, hidden in the mind. It is therefore necessary that the penitent should act as his own accuser, and should be at the same time a criminal, an accuser, and a witness against himself, and should humbly ask pardon of the priest, as his judge, for the sins whereof he accuses himself, and for which he is penitent. But if the priest sees that he is truly penitent, he will pronounce the sentence of absolution, and will, in the Name of Christ, as His Vicar, pardon all his sins. For Christ ratifies the sentence of His priest, and pardons everything which His priest pardons, and what he retains, Christ also retains. For Christ in the Gospel often bids men to repent of their sins. But this they should do in the way which Christ instituted, that is, by submitting to the Sacrament of Penance, that is, by condigitized by C joogle 2y6 fessing their sins to the priest, and asking him for absolution. See Council of Trent, sess. xiv. cap. v. Cajetan therefore is wrong in saying that Confession is not here enjoined. This error is a heresy since that Council, but Cajetan lived before it And whosesoever sins ye retain , they are retained This does not signify merely a refusal of absolution, but positive power. For it means, Those whom ye count unworthy of absolution, on account of their unfitness, whom ye reject, and consider guilty of sin, and deserving of hell, God will judge in like manner, who alone primarily and by His own authority forgives or retains sins. It belongs to God alone to condemn an offence against Himself. But in this matter He appoints priests to be as it were His Vicars. See Matt, xviii. 18. If a priest sees that a penitent has not serious sorrow for his sins, or no serious purpose of amendment, as refusing, e.g., to give up his concubine, or other occasions of sin, or who will not restore the good name or the wealth which he has stolen from his neighbour, the priest ought to refuse such a one absolution, to judge that he is unfit for absolution, and that he must abide in his sin, and incur the guilt of hell. Lastly, observe that though the Apostles were ordained priests before His Passion, and at His last supper after the institution of the Eucharist with these words, Do this , &c., yet they then received only the power of consecrating the Eucharist; but after Christ’s resurrection they received from Him another power, that of remitting sins. These are two different powers, and can be divided and separated from each other. For Christ had this pre-eminent power of appointing priests in a different way from that in which they were afterwards to be appointed. For now in the ordination of priests the matter is the Chalice and Paten with the Bread and Wine, the form being, “Receive thou power to offer sacrifice.,, And when the bishop delivers these vessels to any one, pronouncing these words, he makes him a perfect priest, and confers on him both the power of remitting sins and also of offering sacrifice. So that when he says afterwards, “ Receive thou power to remit, sins” these words are not of the essence of the form, but merely declare Digitized by v^iOOQLe UNBELIEF OF S. THOMAS. 277 the power which was given in those former words. (See Soto, Contr . Paludanem in iv. Dist. 24, Quasi. L, art. 4 ; and Gregory de Valentia, Tract de Or dine, disp . 9, Quasi . 1 , punct. 5.)”

“Whose soever sins ye remit,.... God only can forgive sins, and Christ being God, has a power to do so likewise; but he never communicated any such power to his apostles; nor did they ever assume any such power to themselves, or pretend to exercise it; it is the mark of antichrist, to attempt anything of the kind; who, in so doing, usurps the divine prerogative, places himself in his seat, and shows himself as if he was God: but this is to be understood only in a doctrinal, or ministerial way, by preaching the full and free remission of sins, through the blood of Christ, according to the riches of God's grace, to such as repent of their sins, and believe in Christ; declaring, that all such persons as do so repent and believe, all their sins are forgiven for Christ's sake: and accordingly, they are remitted unto them; in agreement with Christ's own words, in his declaration and commission to his disciples; see Mar 16:16. On the other hand he signifies, that whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained: that is, that whatsoever sins ye declare are not forgiven, they are not forgiven; which is the case of all final unbelievers, and impenitent sinners; who dying without repentance towards God, and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, according to the Gospel declaration, shall be damned, and are damned; for God stands by, and will stand by and confirm the Gospel of his Son, faithfully preached by his ministering servants; and all the world will sooner or later be convinced of the validity, truth, and certainty, of the declarations on each of these heads, made by them.”

“Whose soever sins ye remit - See the notes on Mat 16:19; Mat 18:18. It is certain God alone can forgive sins; and it would not only be blasphemous, but grossly absurd, to say that any creature could remit the guilt of a transgression which had been committed against the Creator. The apostles received from the Lord the doctrine of reconciliation, and the doctrine of condemnation. They who believed on the Son of God, in consequence of their preaching, had their sins remitted; and they who would not believe were declared to lie under condemnation. The reader is desired to consult the note referred to above, where the custom to which our Lord alludes is particularly considered. Dr. Lightfoot supposes that the power of life and death, and the power of delivering over to Satan, which was granted to the apostles, is here referred to. This was a power which the primitive apostles exclusively possessed.”

“Whose sins you shall forgive, [2] &c. These words clearly express the power of forgiving sins, which, as God, he gave to his apostles, and to their successors, bishops and priests, to forgive sins in his name, as his ministers, and instruments, even though they are sinners themselves. For in this, they act not by their own power, nor in their own name, but in the name of God, who as the principal cause, always remitteth sins. This is generally allowed to be done by God’s ministers in the sacrament of baptism, as to the remission of original sin; and the Catholic Church has always held the same of God’s ministers, in the sacrament of penance. (See the Protestant Common Prayer Book, in the Visitation of the Sick.) — Whose sins you shall retain, they are retained: by which we see, that to priests is given a power to be exercised, not only by forgiving, but also by retaining; not only by absolving and loosing, but also by binding, by refusing, or deferring absolution, according to the dispositions that are found in sinners, when they accuse themselves of their sins. From hence must needs follow an obligation on the sinner’s part, to declare, and confess their sins in particular, to the ministers of God, who are appointed the spiritual judges, and physicians of their souls. A judge must know the cause, and a physician the distemper: the one to pronounce a just sentence, the other to prescribe suitable remedies. (Witham) — See here the commission, stamped by the broad seal of heaven, by virtue of which, the pastors of Christ’s Church absolve repenting sinners upon their confession. (Challoner)”

“Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them, &c.--In any literal and authoritative sense this power was never exercised by one of the apostles, and plainly was never understood by themselves as possessed by them or conveyed to them. (See on Mat 16:19). The power to intrude upon the relation between men and God cannot have been given by Christ to His ministers in any but a ministerial or declarative sense--as the authorized interpreters of His word, while in the actings of His ministers, the real nature of the power committed to them is seen in the exercise of church discipline.”