Rashi
Jewish
1040–1105
“As he left. Ehud left, and Eglon's servants came. Relieving himself [lit. 'covering his legs']. Performing his necessary bodily functions. This refers to a bowel movement.”
From the early Church Fathers to now.
1 Jewish · 1 Catholic · 1 Lutheran
“Went out by a postern door. And the king’s servants going in, saw the doors of the parlour shut, and they said: Perhaps he is easing nature in his summer parlour.”
“As he left. Ehud left, and Eglon's servants came. Relieving himself [lit. 'covering his legs']. Performing his necessary bodily functions. This refers to a bowel movement.”
“Door. Lyranus would prefer porticum, “the porch,” as the Chaldean explains the Hebrew by exedra, a portico highly ornamented with pillars and seats, where the princes formerly used to administer justice. Homer give a grand description of the portico of Alcinous. (Odessey) (Haydock) — See that of Solomon described, 3 Kings vii. 6. (Calmet) — The Roman Septuagint adds after prostada, what may perhaps be a second version, “and he went through those who were drawn up,” or the guards. He shewed no signs of fear. (Haydock) — It was not necessary for him to take the key with him, as a common one was used for several chambers, and was necessary only to unloose some bands, with which the doors were fastened. The keys in the East are very large, and of a very different construction from ours. (Calmet) — Nature. Hebrew, “he covereth his feet.” The ancients did not wear breeches: they covered themselves with great care. (Calmet) See Deuteronomy xxiii. 13. (Haydock) — Parlour. Hebrew, “chamber.” Septuagint, “bed-chamber.””
“When the servants of Eglon came (to enter in to their lord) after Ehud's departure and saw the door of the upper room bolted, they thought "surely (אך, lit. only, nothing but) he covers his feet" (a euphemism for performing the necessities of nature; cf. Sa1 24:3), and waited to shaming (cf. 2 King Jdg 2:17; Jdg 8:11), i.e., till they were ashamed of their long waiting (see at Jdg 5:28). At length they opened the door with the key, and found their lord lying dead upon the floor. Ehud's conduct must be judged according to the spirit of those times, when it was thought allowable to adopt any means of destroying the enemy of one's nation. The treacherous assassination of a hostile king is not to be regarded as an act of the Spirit of God, and therefore is not set before us as an example to be imitated. Although Jehovah raised up Ehud as a deliverer to His people when oppressed by Eglon, it is not stated (and this ought particularly to be observed) that the Spirit of Jehovah came upon Ehud, and still less that Ehud assassinated the hostile king under the impulse of that Spirit. Ehud proved himself to have been raised up by the Lord as the deliverer of Israel, simply by the fact that he actually delivered his people from the bondage of the Moabites, and it by no means follows that the means which he selected were either commanded or approved by Jehovah.”
The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.