The interpretation timeline
Philippians 1:1 Douay-Rheims

Paul and Timothy, the servants of Jesus Christ; to all the saints in Christ Jesus, who are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.

A.D. 407 – 1863 7 witnesses 9 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“Here, as writing to those of equal honor, he does not set down his rank of Teacher, but another, and that a great one. And what is that? He calls himself a "servant," and not an Apostle. For great truly is this rank too, and the sum of all good things, to be a servant of Christ, and not merely to be called so. "The servant of Christ," this is truly a free man in respect to sin, and being a genuine servant, he is not a servant to any other, since he would not be Christ's servant, but by halves. And in again writing to the Romans also, he says, "Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ." But writing to the Corinthians and to Timothy he calls himself an "Apostle." On what account then is this? Not because they were superior to Timothy. Far from it. But rather he honors them, and shows them attention, beyond all others to whom he wrote. For he also bears witness to great virtue in them. For besides, there indeed he was about to order many things, and therefore assumed his rank as an Apostle. But here he gives them no injunctions but such as they could perceive of themselves. "To the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi." Since it was likely that the Jews too would call themselves "saints" from the first oracle, when they were called a "holy people, a people for God's own possession"; for this reason he added, "to the saints in Christ Jesus." For these alone are holy, and those henceforth profane. "To the fellow-Bishops and Deacons." What is this? were there several Bishops of one city? Certainly not; but he called the Presbyters so. For then they still interchanged the titles, and the Bishop was called a Deacon. For this cause in writing to Timothy, he said, "Fulfil thy ministry," when he was a Bishop. For that he was a Bishop appears by his saying to him, "Lay hands hastily on no man." And again, "Which was given thee with the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery." Yet Presbyters would not have laid hands on a Bishop. And again, in writing to Titus, he says, "For this cause I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldest appoint elders in every city, as I gave thee charge. If any man is blameless, the husband of one wife"; which he says of the Bishop. And after saying this, he adds immediately, "For the Bishop must be blameless, as God's steward, not self willed." So then, as I said, both the Presbyters were of old called Bishops and Deacons of Christ, and the Bishops Presbyters; and hence even now many Bishops write, "To my fellow-Presbyter," and, "To my fellow-Deacon." But otherwise the specific name is distinctly appropriated to each, the Bishop and the Presbyter.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“The path of the just is like a shining light, et cetera. Prov. IV, 18. In this authority the life of the saints is described from three things. From their narrowness, there, path, because Matth. VII, 14: narrow is the way, etc.; Job XXVIII, 7: the path the bird has not known, et cetera. From their brightness, there, a shining light. Eph. V, 8: you were once darkness, et cetera. For the just are shining, and therefore their way is bright. From their advancement, because it always grows. I Peter II, 2: that in it you may grow, et cetera. And this even unto the perfect day, namely of glory. I Cor. XIII, 10: when that which is perfect has come, it shall be done away, et cetera. Conversely the way of the wicked is broad; dark, shadowy, and failing. Whence Prov. IV, 19 is added the way of the wicked is dark, et cetera. And Matth. VII, 13: wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leads to destruction, et cetera. From these words the matter of this epistle can be drawn. For the Philippians were in the right path of Christ, sustaining many tribulations for Christ. Likewise, illumined through faith, below II, 15: among whom you shine, et cetera. Likewise, they were advancing, as is clear through the whole epistle. Likewise, fittingly after the epistle to the Ephesians, in which instruction is given as to how ecclesiastical unity is to be preserved, these are set forth as an example of preserving ecclesiastical unity, who preserved it best.”
Source
“This epistle is divided into the greeting and the epistolary narration. The second part begins at *I give thanks*, etc. Concerning the first he does three things: first the persons greeting are described; second, the persons greeted, at *to all the saints*, etc.; third, the goods wished for, at *grace to you*, etc. Concerning the first, first the persons greeting are set down; second, their condition, at *servants*, etc. Concerning the first, first the principal person is set down, when he says *Paul*. And Paul is interpreted as meaning something small, in which his humility is noted. Isaiah 60:22: *the least shall become a thousand, and the small one a very strong nation*. Second, at *and Timothy*, the associated person is set down, because he had been their preacher. Below, 2:20: *for I have no one so like-minded, who is solicitous for you with sincere affection*. Then when he says *servants*, etc., their condition is set down. 2 Corinthians 4:5: *for we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ our Lord: but ourselves your servants through Jesus*, etc. But against this, John 15:15: *now I will not call you servants*, etc. I answer: servitude is twofold, according to a twofold fear. For the fear of punishment causes an evil servitude, and it is of this that the aforesaid saying, John 15:6, is to be understood. But chaste fear causes the servitude of reverence, and it is of this that the Apostle speaks here. The persons greeted are all those of the church of Philippi. And, first, the lesser members. Hence he says *to all the saints who are at Philippi*, which is the city that Philip founded; and he says *saints* on account of Baptism. Romans 6:3: *whoever of us have been baptized in Christ, have been baptized in his death*. But he touches on the greater members, saying *with the bishops*, etc. The question is why he places the lesser before the greater. Because the people come before the prelate. Ezekiel 34:2: *are not the flocks fed by the shepherds?* For flocks are to be fed by shepherds, not the other way around. Likewise, why does he pass over the priests? I answer: it must be said that they are included with the bishops, because in one city there are not several bishops. Hence, speaking in the plural, he gives one to understand the priests as well. And yet there is another order, because from the Gospel itself this is read: that after the designation of the twelve apostles (whose persons the bishops bear), he designated seventy-two disciples, whose place the priests hold. Dionysius also distinguishes bishops and priests. But in the beginning, although the orders were distinct, the names of the orders were not; hence here he includes the priests together with the bishops. Then he sets down the goods wished for, at *grace*, etc. And there are two things that include everything. The first is the grace of God remitting sins. Ephesians 2:8: *by grace you are saved*, etc. The last is the peace of man. Psalm 147:14: *who has set your borders as peace*, etc. And consequently he wishes for the intermediate goods, and this *from God the Father*. James 1:17: *every best gift, and every perfect gift, is from above, coming down from the Father of lights*. Likewise, through the merit of the humility of Christ, and therefore he adds *and the Lord Jesus Christ*. John 1:17: *grace and truth came through Jesus Christ*. Ephesians 2:14: *for he himself is our peace*, etc. Consequently he sets down the epistolary narration. And concerning this he does two things: first he gives thanks for the past; second he exhorts to progress in the future, at *but I want you to know*, etc. Concerning the first, first he sets forth the giving of thanks for them; second, its matter, at *upon your fellowship*, etc. Now he gives thanks together with an adjoined joy and entreaty. And so, touching these three things, he says *I give thanks to our God*. To give thanks is to recognize the grace done to oneself. 1 Thessalonians, last chapter: *in all things give thanks*. *In every remembrance of you*, because nothing occurred to the Apostle among them that was not worthy of an act of thanksgiving. And this is a very great thing. Proverbs 10:7: *the memory of the just is with praises*, etc. *For all*. Isaiah 60:21: *but your people shall be all just forever*, etc. He gives thanks, therefore, for their good; prayer and entreaty for their preservation; yet all of it for joy. 1 Kings 12:23: *but far be this sin from me before the Lord, that I should cease to pray for you*. Then when he says *upon the fellowship*, etc., he touches on the matter of the three aforesaid things. And first he sets down the matter of the thanksgiving; second, of the joy concerning things to come, at *being confident*, etc.; third, of the entreaty, at *witness*, etc. He says therefore: *upon the fellowship*, namely by which you share in the teaching of the Gospel, by believing it and fulfilling it in deed. For this is true fellowship. Hebrews, last chapter: *do not forget beneficence and fellowship*, etc. *From the first day*, etc. Ecclesiasticus 27:12: *a holy man remains in wisdom like the sun*, etc. *And being confident of this very thing I rejoice concerning you, that he who has begun*, etc. Jeremiah 17:5f: *cursed is the man who trusts in man, and makes flesh his arm. Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, and the Lord shall be his confidence*. And this is by the power of God. And therefore he says *he who has begun*, etc. John 15:5: *without me you can do nothing*. This is against the Pelagians, who say that the beginning of a good work is from us, but its completion from God. But this is not true: for the beginning of a good work in us is to think about the good, and this itself is from God. 2 Corinthians 3:5: *not that we are sufficient to think anything of ourselves, as if from ourselves*, etc. *Until the day of Christ Jesus*, on which he will reward each one. 2 Timothy, last chapter: *as for the rest, there is laid up for me a crown of justice, which the Lord will render to me*, etc. 1 Corinthians 1:8: *he will confirm you unto the end, without reproach*, etc. The reason for the joy is set down when he says *as it is right for me*, etc.; namely because it is just that you rejoice together with me over my goods. *Because I have you*, etc., as if he were to say: I have this conviction about you, that you are such that you rejoice over those things over which I too rejoice — that the joy is *in my chains*, since at that time he was bound for Christ, over which he was rejoicing. James 1:2f: *count it all joy, my brothers, when you fall into various trials, knowing*, etc. Acts 5:41: *the apostles went rejoicing from the presence of the Council, because they were counted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus*, etc. *And in the defense and in the confirmation of the Gospel*, namely by preaching boldly against tyrants and heretics, and by confirming the Gospel in the hearts of the faithful. Acts 12: *going through in order the region of Galatia and Phrygia, confirming all the disciples*. Or otherwise, according to the Gloss: *in heart*, that is, in desire, that you may be companions of everlasting joy. John 16:22: *no one shall take your joy from you*. And this cannot be withdrawn from my heart, because even while existing in chains and intent upon the confirmation and defense of the Gospel, solicitude for you does not depart from my heart.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1714
A.D.
Matthew Henry Reformed
1662–1714
“We have here the inscription and benediction. Observe, I. The persons writing the epistle - Paul and Timotheus. Though Paul was alone divinely inspired, he joins Timothy with himself, to express his own humility, and put honour upon Timothy. Those who are aged, and strong, and eminent, should pay respect to, and support the reputation of, those who are younger, and weaker, and of less note. The servants of Jesus Christ; not only in the common relation of his disciples, but in the peculiar work of the ministry, the high office of an apostle and an evangelist. Observe, The highest honour of the greatest apostle, and most eminent ministers, is to be the servants of Jesus Christ; not the masters of the churches, but the servants of Christ. Observe, II. The persons to whom it is directed. 1. To all the saints in Christ who are at Philippi. He mentions the church before the ministers, because the ministers are for the church, for their edification and benefit, not the churches for the ministers, for their dignity, dominion, and wealth. Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy, Co2 1:24. They are not only the servants of Christ, but the servants of the church for his sake. Ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake, Co2 4:5. Observe, The Christians here are called saints; set apart for God, or sanctified by his Spirit, either by visible profession or real holiness. And those who are not really saints on earth will never be saints in heaven. Observe, It is directed to all the saints, one as well as another, even the meanest, the poorest, and those of the least gifts. Christ makes no difference; the rich and the poor meet together in him: and the ministers must not make a difference in their care and tenderness upon these accounts. We must not have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons, Jam 2:1. Saints in Christ Jesus; saints are accepted only by virtue of their being in Christ Jesus, or as they are Christians. Out of Christ the best saints will appear sinners, and unable to stand before God. 2. It is directed to the ministers, or church-officers - with the bishops and deacons, the bishops or elders, in the first place, whose office it was to teach and rule, and the deacons, or overseers of the poor, who took care of the outward business of the house of God: the place, the furniture, the maintenance of the ministers, and provision for the poor. These were all the offices which were then known in the church, and which were of divine appointment. The apostle, in the direction of his epistle to a Christian church, acknowledges but two orders, which he calls bishops and deacons. And whosoever shall consider that the same characters and titles, the same qualifications, the same acts of office, and the same honour and respect, are every where ascribed throughout the New Testament to those who are called bishops and presbyters (as Dr. Hammond and other learned men allow), will find it difficult to make them a different office or distinct order of ministry in the scripture times. III. Here is the apostolical benediction: Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, Phi 1:2. This is the same, almost word for word, in all the epistles, to teach us that we must not be shy of forms, though we are not to be tied down to them, especially such as are not scriptural. The only form in the Old Testament is that of a benediction (Num 6:23-26), On this wise you shall bless the children of Israel, saying unto them, The Lord bless thee and keep thee: the Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: the Lord lift up the light of his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace. So in the New Testament, the good which is wished is spiritual good, grace and peace - the free favour and good-will of God, and all the blessed fruits and effects of it, and that from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, jointly from them both, though in a different way. Observe, 1. No peace without grace. Inward peace springs from a sense of divine favour. 2. No grace and peace but from God our Father, the fountain and original of all blessings, the Father of lights, from whom cometh down every good and perfect gift, Jam 1:17. 3. No grace and peace from God our Father, but in and through our Lord Jesus Christ. Christ, as Mediator, is the channel of conveyance of all spiritual blessings to the church, and directs the disposal of them to all his members.”
Source
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ,.... The apostle sets his own name first, as being not only superior to Timothy in age, in office, and in character, but the sole writer of this epistle. The reasons of his joining Timothy with him are, because he was with him when he first preached at Philippi, and so was known unto the Philippians, and respected by them; and because he was about to send him to them again, whose commendations he enlarges on in the epistle itself; and to let them see, that there was a continued agreement between them in affection and doctrine. It shows indeed great humility in the apostle to join with him one so young, and so much inferior to him on all accounts; though it must be observed, that Timothy was not a partner with him in composing the epistle; he only joined in the salutation to this church, and approved of the letter to it, and might be the amanuensis of the apostle; but had no hand in the epistle itself, which was dictated by Paul under divine inspiration. He chooses a character which agreed to them both; he does not say apostles, for Timothy was no apostle, though he himself was, but "servants of Jesus Christ"; not of men; nor did they seek to please men by preaching the doctrines and commandments of men, and which are suited to the carnal reasonings, lusts, and pleasures of men; for then the character here assumed would not belong to them: but servants of Christ; and that not in such sense only as all mankind are, or in right ought to be, since all are his creatures, and therefore ought to serve him; nor merely as all the saints in common are, being bought with the price of Christ's blood, and being effectually called by his grace, and so made willing to serve him from a principle of love, without servile fear, and with a view to his glory; but as ministers of the word, and preachers of the Gospel; they were his servants in the Gospel, they served him under the ministerial character, and as such were the servants of the most high God, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; so that this title is far from being mean and despicable, it is high, honourable, and glorious, To all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons. The persons to whom this epistle is inscribed are here described by the place of their abode, Philippi, and by the various characters they bore in the church; which was at this time very numerous, consisting of many members, and of proper officers, and are both taken notice of here. The members are meant by "all the saints in Christ Jesus"; they were saints or holy persons, not by Moses and his law; not by ceremonial ablutions and sacrifices, which only sanctified to the purifying of the flesh, but could not take away sin, or cleanse from it; nor by themselves and their moral righteousness; for though thereby men, nay outwardly appear holy and righteous, yet they remain inwardly unholy and impure; nor by baptism, which has no regenerating nor sanctifying virtue in it; if persons are not saints before that, they are never by it; it leaves them as it finds them, and neither takes away original or actual sin: but these were saints in and by Christ; they were become holy in consequence of being in Christ; men are first in Christ, and then saints in him; they are chosen "in him" before the world began to be holy, and in time are made new men, new creatures, are created in him unto good works by virtue of their being in him; hence he sanctifies his church and people by his blood, they being so nearly related to him, and interested in him, and he in them; hence they being first of God in Christ, he is made sanctification to them; and hence internal holiness is wrought in them from Christ, by his Spirit; which being begun is carried on, and will be performed until the day of Christ; and which was the happy case of these Philippians, as the apostle was confident of. The officers of this church were "the bishops and deacons". The "bishops" were the pastors, elders, and overseers of the church, for a bishop and an elder is one and the same; see Act 20:17; where the elders of the church at Ephesus are called "overseers" or "bishops"; for the same word is used there as here; and the Syriac version here renders the word by "elders": and they design no other than common and ordinary pastors; who have the name of elders from their age, gravity, and seniority; and that of bishops and overseers from the nature of their office, which is to feed, watch, inspect, and take the oversight of the flock, minister sound doctrine to them, and preserve them from error and heresies. It seems by this, and the instance of the church at Ephesus, that there were, and so may be, where there is necessity for it, more pastors or bishops than one in a church; unless it can be thought that there were more churches than one in each of these cities; or that the pastors of adjacent churches are here included; neither of which seem to be a clear case, but the contrary: but then these pastors or bishops were all upon an equal foot; one had not any authority or power over another, or more authority than another; they were not metropolitan or diocesan bishops, but pastors of a particular church; and were neither lords over one another, nor of God's heritage. The "deacons" were such as served tables, the Lord's table, the minister's table, and the poor's table; took care of the secular affairs of the church, received and disbursed moneys, kept the church's accounts, and provided everything necessary for its temporal good. The one sort of these officers were concerned with the souls and spiritual estate of the members of the church; the others with their bodies and temporal estate, by visiting the sick, relieving the poor, &c. and both these exhibit the true primitive plan of church offices and discipline; there being no other order of offices or officers, in a Christian church of divine institution, but pastors and deacons; whatever else is introduced is without warrant, and comes from the man of sin. These officers are mentioned by the apostle, not only to show his respect to them, but to observe to the members of this church, that they ought to esteem them highly for their works' sake; these being offices of great importance and usefulness to the church, which, by having such, was a truly organized church of Christ.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Paul and Timotheus - That Timothy was at this time with the apostle in Rome we learn from Phi 2:19, and also that he was very high in the apostle's estimation. He had also accompanied the apostle on his two voyages to Philippi, see Acts 16 and 20., and was therefore deservedly dear to the Church in that city. It was on these accounts that St. Paul joined his name to his own, not because he was in any part the author of this epistle, but he might have been the apostle's amanuensis, though the subscription to the epistle gives this office to Epaphroditus. Neither in this epistle, nor in those to the Thessalonians and to Philemon does St. Paul call himself an apostle; the reason of which appears to be, that in none of these places was his apostolical authority called in question. Bishops and deacons - Επισκοποις· The overseers of the Church of God, and those who ministered to the poor, and preached occasionally. There has been a great deal of paper wasted on the inquiry, "Who is meant by bishops here, as no place could have more than one bishop?" To which it has been answered: "Philippi was a metropolitan see, and might have several bishops." This is the extravagance of trifling. I believe no such officer is meant as we now term bishop.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“With the bishops and deacons. [1] By bishops many understand those who were only priests; for the name of priests, at that time, was common to those who were by their ordination priests or bishops, though the order as well as the functions were different. St. Chrysostom also takes notice, that the name of deacon then signified any minister of Christ. St. Paul also might mean the bishops, or priests and deacons, not only of Philippi, but also of the adjacent places. (Witham)”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“The apostle associates Timothy with himself, as a bishop sharing f§e high functions, whose plenitude belongs to the apostleship. Timothy had accompanied Paul in his journeys to Philippi. Acts xvi. 20.”
“" What does this mean ? Were there at that time many bishops of one city ? By no means ; but he styled the priests by this name ; for up to that time they used the names promiscuously, and the bishop was even styled deacon." St. Chrysostom.”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.