The interpretation timeline
Philippians 1:18 Douay-Rheims

But what then? So that by all means, whether by occasion, or by truth, Christ be preached: in this also I rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.

A.D. 220 – 1871 8 witnesses 10 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“Therefore, says he, it matters not to me "whether it be in pretence or in truth that Christ is preached," because one Christ alone was announced, whether in their "pretentious" or their "truthful" faith.”
258
A.D.
Cyprian Patristic
c. A.D. 200–258
“For as to what some say, as if it tended to favour heretics, that the Apostle Paul declared, "Only every way, whether in pretence or in truth, let Christ be preached," we find that this also can avail nothing to their benefit who support and applaud heretics. For Paul, in his epistle, was not speaking of heretics, nor of their baptism, so that anything can be shown to have been alleged which pertained to this matter. He was speaking of brethren, whether as walking disorderly anti against the discipline of the Church, or as keeping the truth of the Gospel with the fear of God. And he said that certain of them spoke the word of God with constancy and courage, but some acted in envy and dissension; that some maintained towards him a benevolent love, but that some indulged a malevolent spirit of dissension; but yet that he bore all patiently, so long only as, whether in truth or in pretence, the name of Christ which Paul preached might come to the knowledge of many; and the sowing of the word, which as yet had been new and irregular, might increase through the preaching of the speakers. Besides, it is one thing for those who are within the Church to speak concerning the name of Christ; it is another for those who are without, and act in opposition to the Church, to baptize in the name of Christ. Wherefore, let not those who favour heretics put forward what Paul spoke concerning brethren, but let them show if he thought anything was to be conceded to the heretic, or if he approved of their faith or baptism, or if he appointed that perfidious and blasphemous men could receive remission of their sins outside the Church.”
Source
“But to what they allege and say on behalf of the heretics, that the apostle said, "Whether in pretence or in truth, Christ is preached," it is idle for us to reply; when it is manifest that the apostle, in his epistle wherein he said this, made mention neither of heretics nor of baptism of heretics, but spoke of brethren only, whether as perfidiously speaking in agreement with himself, or as persevering in sincere faith; nor is it needful to discuss this in a long argument, but it is sufficient to read the epistle itself, and to gather from the apostle himself what the apostle said.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"What then? only that every way, whether in pretense, or in truth, Christ is proclaimed." But see the wisdom of the Man. He did not vehemently accuse them, but mentioned the result; what difference does it make to me, says he, whether it be done in this or that way? only that every way, "whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed." He did not say, "Let him be proclaimed," as some suppose, stating that he opens the way for the heresies, but, "He is proclaimed." For in the first place he did not lay down the law and say, as if laying down the law, "Let Him be proclaimed," but he reported what was taking place; secondly, if he even spoke as laying down the law, not even thus would he be opening the way for the heresies. For let us examine the matter. For even if he gave permission to preach as they preached, not even thus was he opening the way for the heresies. How so? In that they preached healthfully; though the aim and purpose on which they acted was corrupted, still the preaching itself was not changed, and they were forced so to preach. And why? Because, had they preached otherwise than as Paul preached, had they taught otherwise than as he taught, they would not have increased the wrath of the Emperor. But now by furthering his preaching, by teaching in the same way, and making disciples as he did, they had power to exasperate the Emperor, when he saw the multitude of the disciples numerous. But then some wicked and senseless man, taking hold of this passage, says, Verily they would have done the contrary, they would have driven off those who had already believed, instead of making believers to abound, had they wished to annoy him. What shall we answer? That they looked to this thing only, how they might involve him in present danger, and leave him no escape; and thus they thought to grieve him, and to quench the Gospel, rather than in the other way. By that other course they would have extinguished the wrath of the Emperor, they would have let him go at large and preach again; but by this course they thought that because of him all would be ruined, could they but destroy him. The many however could not have this intention, but certain bitter men alone. Then "and therein," says he, "I rejoice, yea, and will rejoice." What means, "yea, I will rejoice"? Even if this be done still more, he means. For they cooperate with me even against their will; and will receive punishment for their toil, whilst I, who contributed nothing thereto, shall receive reward. Is there anything beyond this villainy of the Devil, to contrive the punishment of the preaching, and vengeance for the toils? Seest thou with how many evils he pierces through his own! How else would a hater and an enemy of their salvation have arranged all this? Seest thou how he who wages war against the truth has no power, but rather wounds himself, as one who kicks against the goads?”
Source
“None of the grievous things which are in this present life can fix their fangs upon that lofty soul, which is truly philosophic, neither enmity, nor accusations, nor slanders, nor dangers, nor plots. It flies for refuge as it were to a mighty fortress, securely defended there against all that attack it from this lower earth. Such was the soul of Paul; it had taken possession of a place higher than any fortress, the seat of spiritual wisdom, that is, true philosophy. For that of those without, i.e. the heathen, is mere words, and childish toys. But it is not of these we now speak, but at present concerning the things of Paul. That blessed one had both the Emperor for his enemy, and in addition, many other foes many ways afflicting him, even with bitter slander. And what says he? Not only do I not grieve nor sink beneath these things, but "I even rejoice, yea, and will rejoice," not for a season, but always will I rejoice for these things. "For I know that this shall turn out to my salvation," that which is to come, when even their enmity and jealousy towards me further the Gospel.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“There were in the times of the apostles some who were preaching truth but not in truth, that is, not in a true spirit. Of these the apostle says that their proclamation was not pure but was preached "through envy and rivalry." Even though they were tolerated who proclaimed the truth without purity of mind, they were not praised, as if to assume that they were preaching with a pure mind. So Paul says of them that, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed. Yet he certainly does not imply that Christ may now be denied in order to be later proclaimed.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above, the Apostle described the progress that followed from him; here he treats of the joy conceived from this progress. And first he sets down the matter of the joy; second, the joy itself, there "and in this I rejoice," etc. Now it happens sometimes that some joy arises from a good cause, and this directly and per se, and sometimes from a bad cause, and this indirectly and per accidens. For when it is from a good cause, one should rejoice both in the effect and in the cause, as in an almsdeed done for God's sake. But when it is from a bad cause, then one should rejoice in the effect, but not in the cause. And so it is with the redemption through Christ, although it came about from the wickedness of Judas and of the Jews. So it happens in the Church, where benefit comes about sometimes through good preachers as regards a good intention, sometimes through bad ones as regards a bad intention; and one should rejoice in both, as has been said. And therefore he says "for what," etc. By occasion he proclaims Christ, who does not intend this as his principal aim but for the sake of something else, say, gain or glory. Prov. 18: "he who wishes to withdraw from a friend seeks an occasion." By truth, however, when it is from a right intention. Isaiah 38:3: "I beseech thee, O Lord, remember, I pray thee, how I have walked before thee in truth and with a perfect heart," etc. But since it happens in either way to the benefit of the Church, therefore he says "if Christ is proclaimed," etc., because if he were proclaiming something other than Christ, then it would matter greatly, which happens when false doctrine is taught. Augustine: "the shepherd who proclaims for the sake of truth is to be loved; the hireling who does so for gain is to be tolerated; he who is false is to be expelled." Then he sets down the joy that follows, saying "and in this," namely that my bonds are made manifest for Christ's sake, that Christ is proclaimed, "I rejoice," in the present, John 14:28: "if you loved me, you would indeed rejoice," etc., "and I shall rejoice" in the future, Isaiah 51:3: "they shall obtain joy and gladness," etc. Then, when he says "for I know," etc., he sets down the fruit arising from his own progress. And first he sets down the fruit itself; second he raises a certain doubt, there "for whether to live," etc. Likewise, first he proposes the fruit; second, the help for obtaining it, there "through your prayer," etc.; third he assigns the matter of the fruit, there "but not in every," etc. He says therefore: I rejoice in these things, and this on account of the fruit arising from them unto eternal salvation. Isaiah 45:17: "Israel is saved in the Lord with eternal salvation," etc. And this is so because when we do some good things by cooperating in the salvation of others, it redounds to our own salvation. For if, as is said in Matthew 18:6, "whoever shall scandalize one of these little ones," etc.; how great a glory is he worthy of who procures the salvation of many? Now the help is threefold: namely, on the part of others, mutual prayer. Hence he says "through your prayers," namely, from which I hope to be helped by God. James, last chapter: "pray for one another, that you may be saved," etc. On the part of God, from whom we have the hope of salvation. Isaiah 26:17-18: "from thy face, O Lord, we have conceived, and have been as it were in labor, and have brought forth the spirit of salvation." And therefore he says "and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ." Romans 8:26: "the Spirit helps our infirmity." And he speaks by way of likeness. For when someone is weak, he needs one to relieve him so that he may be sustained, and this is to supply; and we are weak, therefore we need the supply of the Spirit. John 14:26: "and he shall suggest to you all things," etc.; as it were supplying to you. On our part there is hope in God, because, Prov. 11:28: "he who trusts in riches shall fall." Our hope, therefore, must be in God, etc. Psalm 124:1: "they who trust in the Lord are as mount Sion," etc. And therefore he says "according to my expectation and hope." But is not hope the expectation of future beatitude? It must be said that hope is a movement of the appetite toward an arduous good. And this in two ways: for when someone hopes to attain through himself, thus hope is without expectation; but when through another, then it is hope with expectation, and thus we expect, having hope of attaining something through another. Psalm 39:2: "with expectation I have waited for the Lord," etc. Romans 8:24: "we are saved by hope." But he says "I know," and afterward "I hope and I expect." Is this hope then certain? The Apostle answers, saying: "yes, because in nothing shall I be confounded." 1 Maccabees 2:61: "all who hope in him do not grow weak." Romans 5:5: "but hope does not confound." Ecclesiasticus 2:11: "no one has hoped in the Lord and been confounded." Of this he first assigns the reason, second he expounds it, there "for to me to live," etc. This reason is taken from the fact that he himself is wholly ordered to the service of Christ, as if he were saying: therefore these things will come to me unto salvation, because I am wholly for the service of Christ. And first he sets down confidence; second, perseverance; third, the certainty of intention. He says therefore "but in all confidence," etc., as if to say: many persecute me, but I trust in God. Isaiah 12:2: "I will act with confidence and will not fear." Psalm 11:6: "I will act with confidence in him." "As always," that is, from the beginning of his conversion. Acts 9:27: "how in Damascus he had acted with confidence," etc. "So also now," Job 27:6: "my justification which I have begun to hold, I will not abandon." Third, he shows that his intention is right, because Christ will be magnified, who, since he is true God, cannot be magnified or diminished in himself, but in us, that is, in the knowledge of others. Then, therefore, one magnifies Christ when one extends knowledge of him. Ecclesiasticus 43:35: "who shall magnify him as he is from the beginning?" And this both in word and in deed, when the greatness of a divine effect shows his greatness. And among the marvelous effects, justification is one such, and as long as it lies hidden in a man's heart, Christ is not magnified through it, except as regards that man's own heart, not as regards others; but whenever it bursts forth into outward, visible bodily acts, then it is truly and properly magnified. And therefore he says "in my body." In our body Christ is magnified in two ways. In one way insofar as we devote our body to his service, carrying out his ministries bodily. 1 Corinthians 6:20: "glorify and carry God in your body." In another way by exposing our body for Christ. 1 Corinthians 13:3: "if I should deliver my body, so that I burn," etc. But the first way comes about through life; the second through death. Therefore he says "whether through life," because by living he operates, "or through death." Romans 14:8: "whether we live, or whether we die, we are the Lord's," etc. This can also be understood of spiritual death. Colossians 3:5: "mortify your members which are upon the earth," etc. Then he explains how he will be magnified through life and through death, saying "for to me to live," etc. For life imports a certain motion. For those things are said to live which are moved of themselves. And hence it is that that seems to be radically a man's life, which is the principle of motion in him. Now this is that to which his affection is united as to an end, because from this a man is moved to all things. Hence some call that from which they are moved to act their life, as hunters call the hunt, and friends call their friend. So therefore Christ is our life, since the whole principle of our life and operation is Christ. And therefore the Apostle says "for to me to live," etc., because Christ alone moved him. "And to die is gain" — here the Apostle speaks properly. For anyone reckons it a gain to himself when he can perfect the life which he has imperfectly. Thus the sick man reckons a healthy life as gain. Our life is Christ. Colossians 3:3: "your life is hidden with Christ in God." But here it is imperfect. 2 Corinthians 5:6: "as long as we are in the body, we are exiled from the Lord." And therefore when we die in body, our life, namely Christ, is perfected for us, to whom we are then present. Psalm 126:2: "when he shall have given sleep to his beloved," etc. 2 Timothy 4:6: "for I am already being poured out, and the time of my dissolution is at hand," etc. Then, when he says "but if to live," etc., he sets down a certain doubt concerning the things that have been said. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets down the doubt; second he resolves it, there "and this trusting," etc. Likewise, the first part into two: for first he sets down the doubt; second he proposes reasons for either side, there "but I am straitened," etc. He says therefore: if to live in the flesh, this to me is fruit, etc.; it is true that in my body, while I live, Christ is magnified. Therefore my living in the flesh, that is, my life in the flesh, is fruit of this sort. Hence he predicates the effect of the cause, that is, if life brings me this fruit, that Christ be magnified, life in the flesh is good and fruitful. Romans 6:22: "you have your fruit unto sanctification," etc. If then it is so, "I know not what I shall choose," whether to die, or to live. Romans 8:26: "for what we should pray for as we ought, we know not," etc. Wisdom 9:14: "for the thoughts of mortal men are fearful, and our counsels uncertain." But why do you doubt? Because "I am straitened," etc. First he sets down the reason for one side; second for the other. For in man there is a twofold motion, namely of nature and of grace. Of nature, toward not dying. 2 Corinthians 5:4: "we would not be unclothed, but clothed upon," etc. John, last chapter: "and another shall lead thee whither thou wouldst not," etc. And of grace, which charity suggests, which moves toward the love of God and of neighbor. This affection toward the love of God moves us to be with Christ. And therefore he says "having a desire to be dissolved," not simply, but "to be with Christ." 2 Corinthians 5:8: "but we are confident, and have a good will to be absent rather from the body, and to be present with the Lord," etc. In which is noted the falsity of the opinion of the Greeks, that the souls of the saints after death are not immediately with Christ. And this he desires because it is "much better to be with Christ." Psalm 72:25: "for what have I in heaven," etc. "My flesh and my heart have fainted," namely as regards possessing the good. Psalm 83:11: "better is one day in thy courts above thousands," etc. But the love of neighbor moves toward the progress of the neighbor, and therefore he says "but to remain," etc., that is, my life is necessary on account of your benefit. 2 Corinthians 5:13: "whether we are transported in mind, it is to God; or whether we are sober, it is for you," etc. Or otherwise, "I am straitened," etc., that is, from a twofold side the desire arises "to be dissolved," etc., "better," etc. The sense is not changed. But this does not seem doubtful; indeed the Apostle even seems to incline toward the former part. For the first desire is roused in us by the love of God, the second by the love of neighbor; but the first desire is greater and better; therefore, etc. I answer. It must be said that the love of God is twofold: namely, the love of concupiscence, by which one wills to enjoy God and delight in him, and this is the good of man. Likewise there is the love of friendship, by which a man puts the honor of God ahead even of this delight by which he enjoys God, and this is perfect charity. Hence Romans 8:38: "neither death, nor life, nor angels," etc. And he adds in chapter 9:3: "I wished myself to become an anathema for my brethren," etc. And this he said in order to show that he was of a more perfect charity, as it were being ready, for the love of God and his glory, to forgo the delight of the vision of God; and therefore he chose this, and rightly, as being more perfect.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“What then? notwithstanding every way,.... What follows from hence? what is to be concluded from all this? what is to be thought or said in this case? this, that notwithstanding these brethren acted on those different principles, and with those different views: whether in pretence: of love to Christ, zeal for the Gospel, and concern for the good of souls; though their real views were their own applause, and detriment to the apostle's character; or "by occasion", as the Syriac version renders the word, and as many interpreters think is the sense of it; occasionally preaching Christ, and making a handle of this to gain some other points, and get, advantages to themselves as some: or in truth; as the hearty friends of Christ and the apostle did; they not only preached Christ who is the truth, and the truth as it is in Jesus, and every truth of the Gospel; and especially that fundamental one, salvation alone by a crucified Christ, and that without any adulteration or concealing any part of it; but with great purity of mind, with integrity of heart, and in the uprightness of their souls; as of sincerity, and in the sight of God; without selfish and sinister ends, and any ambitious views and evil designs: whether it was now in the one or the other way, upon the one or the other principles and views, the apostle stood thus affected; and these were his sentiments, reflections, and resolutions, that inasmuch as Christ is preached; in the glory of his person, in the fulness of his grace, in the suitableness of his offices and great salvation, in the excellency of his righteousness, and the virtue of his blood, and the efficacy of his sacrifice, and therein I do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice; not that it was an indifferent thing with him, whether Christ was sincerely or hypocritically preached; or that he could take any pleasure in the manner of preaching, and in the principles and views of one sort of these preachers; for nothing was more disagreeable to him than envy and ambition, strife and contention, hypocrisy and insincerity; but he rejoiced in the subject matter of their ministry, which was Christ Jesus the Lord, whom he dearly loved, and whose interest, if served by any means, or any sort of persons, was a pleasure to him; and also in the effects and consequences of their ministry, the establishing of the saints, the conversion of sinners, the spread of the Gospel, and the enlargement of the interest of Christ: all which may be answered through the preaching of Christ, by evil designing men; for Christ and his Gospel are the same by whomsoever preached, and God may make use of his own truths to answer his ends and purposes, whoever are the dispensers of them, and though they themselves may be cast away, as Judas and others.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“What then? - It is a matter of little importance to me how Christ is preached, provided he be preached. I rejoice that any thing is known of him; and am truly glad that the Gospel is even made partially known, for this will lead to farther inquiries, and in the end be of service to the truth.”
1871
A.D.
1871
“What follows from this? Does this trouble me as they thought it would? "Notwithstanding" their unkind thought to me, and self-seeking intention, the cause I have at heart is furthered "every way" of preaching, "whether in pretense (with a by motive, Phi 1:16) or in truth (out of true 'love' to Christ, Phi 1:17), Christ is proclaimed; and therein I do rejoice, yea, and I will rejoice." From this it would seem that these self-seeking teachers in the main "proclaimed Christ," not "another Gospel," such as the Judaizers in Galatia taught (Gal 1:6-8); though probably having some of the Jewish leaven (see on Phi 1:15-16), their chief error was their self-seeking envious motive, not so much error of doctrine; had there been vital error, Paul would not have rejoiced. The proclamation of CHRIST," however done, roused attention, and so was sure to be of service. Paul could thus rejoice at the good result of their bad intentions (Psa 76:10; Isa 10:5, Isa 10:7).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.