Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other thinketh he may have confidence in the flesh, I more,

“But "those things which he had once accounted gain," and which he enumerates in the preceding verse-"trust in the flesh," the sign of "circumcision," his origin as "an Hebrew of the Hebrews," his descent from "the tribe of Benjamin," his dignity in the honours of the Pharisee -he now reckons to be only "loss" to himself; (in other words, ) it was not the God of the Jews, but their stupid obduracy, which he repudiates.”

“"And have no confidence," says he, "in the flesh; though I myself might have confidence even in the flesh." What does he call "confidence" here, and "in the flesh"? Boasting, boldness, a high tone. And he did well to add this; for if he had been of the Gentiles, and had condemned circumcision, and not only circumcision, but all those that adopted it out of place, it would have seemed that he was running it down, because he lacked the high ancestry of Judaism, as being a stranger to its solemn rites, and having no part therein. But as it is, he, who, though a sharer, yet blames them, will not therefore blame them as having no share in them, but as disowning them; not from ignorance, but most especially from acquaintance with them. Accordingly observe what he says in his Epistle to the Galatians also; having been brought into a necessity of saying great things about himself, how even in these circumstances does he manifest nought but humility. "For ye have heard, of my manner of life in time past," he says, "in the Jews' religion" (Gal. i. 13); and again here; "if any other man thinketh to have confidence in the flesh, I more." And he immediately added, "a Hebrew of Hebrews." But "if any other man," says he, showing the necessity, showing that it was on their account that he spoke. "If ye have confidence," he says, I also say so, since I am silent. And observe the absence of all ungraciousness in the reproofs; by forbearing to do it by name, he gave even them the opportunity of retracing their steps. "If any one thinketh to have confidence"; and it was well to say "thinketh," either inasmuch as they really had no such confidence, or as that confidence was no real confidence, for all was by necessity, and not of choice.”

“He set forth examples which they ought to follow; here he shows whose examples they ought to avoid. And concerning this he does three things: first, he sets forth beforehand whom they ought to avoid; second, an example of avoidance through the conduct of the saints, where it says "For we," etc.; third, he leads them to avoid those whom they considered worthy of imitation, where it says "Imitators," etc. Again, the first part is divided into three parts: first he sets forth beforehand the purpose of this teaching; second, the necessity of writing, where it says "the same things to you," etc.; third, the reason for the necessity, where it says "See," etc. The intention of the admonition is to remove the faithful Gentiles from legal observances, to which certain persons were leading them. And therefore he says "O brothers"—namely, through faith—"for the rest," that is, after I have admonished you, as above, "rejoice in the Lord" only, not in legal observances. Habakkuk 3:18: "But I will rejoice in the Lord, and I will exult in God my Jesus," etc. And this, because "the same things" which I said in your presence, it is not tedious for me to write to you in your absence. For words easily pass away, but written things remain. Ecclesiasticus 38:25: "Write wisdom in the time of leisure," etc. Jude 1:3: "Using all diligence to write to you concerning your common salvation, I had need to write to you," etc. Romans 15:15: "I have written to you, brothers, more boldly in part, as it were bringing you back into memory," etc. And the cause of this necessity is that seducers press in; and therefore it is fitting to write the truth more insistently, whence he says "See," that is, observe, etc. And he says three things about these: namely, the irrational savagery of heart; whence he says "dogs." The Gloss: it is the nature of a dog that it barks immediately out of anger, not from reason, but from habit. So also those men. Isaiah 56:11: "Most shameless dogs, they knew not fullness; these shepherds knew not understanding," etc. The last chapter of the Apocalypse: "Outside are the dogs," etc. Second, the sowing of perverse doctrine, where it says "evil workers," because they do not labor faithfully in the vineyard of the Lord, nor do they cast good seed into the field. Matthew 13:28: "An enemy man has done this," etc. 2 Timothy 2:15: "Take care to show yourself approved to God," etc. Third, of dissension, where it says "concision." And he uses this word as a rebuke against them. For they preach circumcision, which cannot stand together with the grace of Christ. Galatians 5:2: "If you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing." Whence, playing on the word, he says "concision," as though they have not circumcision but concision. Then when he says "But we," etc., he shows how they are to be avoided by the saints. And first, how by all; second, how by himself, where it says "wherefore," etc. He says therefore: I say that they are the concision, but we are the true circumcision, who in spirit, etc. Now circumcision is twofold, namely bodily and spiritual. Romans 2:28: "For he is not a Jew who is one openly, nor is that circumcision which is openly in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one in secret, and circumcision is of the heart, in spirit, not in the letter," etc. For circumcision of the flesh is that which is of the excess of the flesh, but circumcision of the spirit is that by which the Holy Spirit cuts away the excessive interior concupiscences. And therefore he says "we are," etc., that is, who inwardly circumcises us to God. Romans 2: "For God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit in the Gospel of his Son," etc. 1 Corinthians 14:15: "I will sing psalms in spirit, I will sing psalms also with the mind; I will pray in spirit, I will pray also with the mind," etc. Now circumcision was given, as is shown in Romans 4:16, so that it might be shown as a sign of Abraham's faith, namely so that his faith might be shown true, which was faith concerning the future seed. Galatians 3:16: "To Abraham were the promises spoken," etc. Circumcision, therefore, is a sign of Abraham's faith concerning Christ. He therefore is circumcised who is inwardly renewed by the Holy Spirit in Christ, who is the truth of circumcision. Colossians 2:11: "You have been circumcised with a circumcision not made by hand, in the stripping off of the body of the flesh, but in the circumcision of Christ," etc. And "not having confidence in the flesh," that is, in carnal circumcision, because, as is said in John 6:63: "It is the spirit that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing." Now "flesh" is taken in us sometimes for carnal concupiscence, sometimes for care of the flesh, and sometimes for carnal observance. And we ought to circumcise both, and not glory in them. Then when he says "although I," etc., he sets forth his own example, and first he sets forth beforehand his own eminence, which he had in the legal state; second he shows how he despised it, where it says "but what things," etc. The first he sets forth first in general; second he explains part by part, where it says "circumcised," etc. Concerning the first he does two things: first he shows the confidence which he could have had in legal observances, saying: we ought not to have confidence in legal observances, "although I have"—that is, I could have if I wished—because "in whatever anyone is bold—I speak in foolishness—I also am bold," etc., as is said in II, 21. And this even more excellently, because "I more." 2 Corinthians 11:23: "As one less wise, I say, I more," etc. And all this he brings forward so that he might more effectively destroy the legal observances. For many despise what they do not know, or do not have, and this is worth nothing; but it counts when someone has something and despises it, and does not glory in it. Thus, if the Apostle had not had a place in the legal state, it could be said that he came to the state of the Gospel for that reason. And therefore he shows through this his eminence in that state. And first as to lineage; second as to manner of life, where it says "according to the law," etc. As to the first, in three ways: as to the sacrament of his lineage, because "circumcised the eighth day." Genesis 17:10: "That it may be a sign of the covenant between me and you," etc. And he says "the eighth day," because this was the difference between proselytes and those who were of the lineage of Abraham: for the former were circumcised not on the eighth day, but already as adults when they were converted, whereas these, according to the law, were circumcised on the eighth day. Genesis 17:12: "An infant of eight days shall be circumcised among you." Thus therefore he was not as a proselyte, but as a true Israelite. Second, as to the lineage itself, and first as to the people, when he says "of the race of Israel." For from Abraham two peoples descended: one through Isaac, and the other through Ishmael. From the first, two: one through Esau, and the other through Jacob. But the two, namely those from Esau and the Ishmaelites, did not obtain the inheritance, but Jacob alone, who is also Israel. Therefore he says "of the race of Israel." 2 Corinthians 11:22: "Are they Israelites? So am I." Likewise as to the tribe, because in the tribe of Israel there were some from the handmaids, namely from Bilhah and Zilpah; some from the free women, namely Leah and Rachel; and among these certain ones were always in the worship of God, namely Levi, Judah, and Benjamin. The others, in the time of Jeroboam, were turned to idols. And therefore the tribe of Benjamin was privileged, because it was in the faith and love of his wife, and the temple was in it. Deuteronomy 33:12: "Benjamin, most beloved of the Lord, shall dwell confidently in him; as it were in a bridal chamber he shall abide all the day, and he shall rest between his shoulders," etc. Genesis 49:27: "Benjamin a ravenous wolf, in the morning shall eat the prey, and in the evening shall divide the spoil." By which Paul was prefigured, who was at one time against the Church. Third, as to name and language, when he says "Hebrew." Some say that "Hebrew" is said from Abraham: and this Augustine says, but afterward he retracts it. But it is said from Heber, concerning whom Genesis 11:14. But that it is not from Abraham is clear, because even Abraham is called a Hebrew. Genesis 14:13: "It was announced to Abraham the Hebrew." The Gloss on Genesis 11 says that in the time of Heber the lip of all peoples was divided, and that language, which was before, remained in the family of Heber, and in the worship of the one God, and among all the Hebrews. He was also born of Hebrew parents, and therefore he says "of the Hebrews." Then he shows his eminence as to manner of life. And first as to sect, when he says "according to the law, a Pharisee." Among the Jews indeed there were three sects, namely of the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Essenes. But the Pharisees approached more closely to the truth, because the Sadducees denied the resurrection, nor did they believe there to be angels, nor spirits. But the Pharisees confess both, as is said in Acts 23:8. And therefore in this the sect of the Pharisees is more commendable. But how he was a Pharisee is stated in Acts 26:5: "Since according to the most certain sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee." Second, as to the zeal which the Jews had, although not according to knowledge, in persecuting Christians, therefore he says "persecuting the Church of God." Galatians 1:23: "He who once persecuted us now preaches the faith which he once assailed." And Acts 26:9: "And I indeed had thought that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth, which also I did at Jerusalem, and many of the saints I shut up in prisons," etc. 1 Corinthians 15:9: "I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God." Third, as to the innocence of his manner of life. Therefore he says "according to righteousness," etc. This righteousness consists in exterior things, but the righteousness of faith is of the heart. Acts 15:9: "Purifying their hearts by faith." For, as to exterior righteousness, the Apostle lived innocently. And therefore he says "without complaint," etc. But he does not say "without sin," because complaint is the sin of scandal to one's neighbors in those things which are exterior. Luke 1:6: "Walking in all the commandments and justifications of the Lord without complaint," etc. And therefore it is not contrary to what is said in Ephesians 2:3: "Among whom we also walked," because he did not then have the true righteousness of faith, which makes a man pure, but only that of the law. Then when he says "but what things to me," etc., he shows the contempt of his eminence in legal observances. And first he shows for what reason he despised legal observances in general; second, in particular, where it says "nevertheless," etc. He says therefore: "these things which were," etc., that is, which I reckoned great, namely that I was a Pharisee, etc.—"these I have judged, because of Christ, to be losses to me," that is, I reckon that they are to my detriment. For the legal observances, which in the time of the law were efficacious, through Christ have been made harmful. And therefore he says "losses." And the end of this is Christ. And therefore he says "because of Christ." And he explains, because first, for the sake of knowing Christ; second, for the sake of gaining Christ. As to the first he says, "nevertheless I count all things to be loss"; this is true, if one relied on them. And what I once did, I reckon a loss to me, and this on account of the desire for the right knowledge of Christ my Lord. 1 Corinthians 2:2: "I judged not myself to know anything, except Jesus Christ, and him crucified." And this on account of the surpassing knowledge, etc. For this surpasses all other knowledge. For nothing better can be known than the word of God, in whom are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden, Colossians 2:3. As to the second he says, "for whom all things," etc. And first he shows that he despised legal observances for the sake of gaining Christ; second he shows that he might gain Christ, where it says "not having," etc. He says therefore, "I have counted all things loss," regarding himself toward them as toward a loss and worthless things, and this "that I may gain Christ," that is, that I may obtain him, and be joined to him through charity.”

“The apostle here proposes himself for an example of trusting in Christ only, and not in his privileges as an Israelite. I. He shows what he had to boast of as a Jew and a Pharisee. Let none think that the apostle despised these things (as men commonly do) because he had them not himself to glory in. No, if he would have gloried and trusted in the flesh, he had as much cause to do so as any man: If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof to trust in the flesh, I more, Phi 3:4. He had as much to boast of as any Jew of them all. 1. His birth-right privileges. He was not a proselyte, but a native Israelite: of the stock of Israel. And he was of the tribe of Benjamin, in which tribe the temple stood, and which adhered to Judah when all the other tribes revolted. Benjamin was the father's darling, and this was a favourite tribe. A Hebrew of the Hebrews, an Israelite on both sides, by father and mother, and from one generation to another; none of his ancestors had matched with Gentiles. 2. He could boast of his relations to the church and the covenant, for he was circumcised the eighth day; he had the token of God's covenant in his flesh, and was circumcised the very day which God had appointed. 3. For learning, he was a Pharisee, brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, an eminent doctor of the law: and was a scholar learned in all the learning of the Jews, taught according to the perfect manner of the laws of the fathers, Act 22:3. He was a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee (Act 23:6), and after the most strict sect of his religion lived a Pharisee, Act 26:5. 4. He had a blameless conversation: Toughing the righteousness which is of the law, blameless: as far as the Pharisees' exposition of the law went, and as to the mere letter of the law and outward observance of it, he could acquit himself from the breach of it and could not be accused by any. 5. He had been an active man for his religion. As he made a strict profession of it, under the title and character of a Pharisee, so he persecuted those whom he looked upon as enemies to it. Concerning zeal, persecuting the church. 6. He showed that he was in good earnest, though he had a zeal without knowledge to direct and govern the exercise of it: I was zealous towards God, as you all are this day, and I persecuted this way unto the death, Act 22:3, Act 22:4. All this was enough to have made a proud Jew confident, and was stock sufficient to set up with for his justification. But, II. The apostle tells us here how little account he made of these, in comparison of his interest in Christ and his expectations from him: But what things were gain to me those have I counted loss for Christ (Phi 3:7); that is, those things which he had counted gain while he was a Pharisee, and which he had before reckoned up, these he counted loss for Christ. "I should have reckoned myself an unspeakable loser of, to adhere to them, I had lost my interest in Jesus Christ." He counted them loss; not only insufficient to enrich him, but what would certainly impoverish and ruin him, if he trusted to them, in opposition to Christ. Observe, The apostle did not persuade them to do any thing but what he had himself did, to quit any thing but what he had himself quitted, nor venture on any bottom but what he himself had ventured his immortal soul upon. - Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, Phi 3:8. Here the apostle explains himself. 1. He tells us what it was that he was ambitious of and reached after: it was the knowledge of Christ Jesus his Lord, a believing experimental acquaintance with Christ as Lord; not a merely notional and speculative, but a practical and efficacious knowledge of him. So knowledge is sometimes put for faith: By his knowledge, or the knowledge of him, shall my righteous servant justify many, Isa 53:11. And it is the excellency of knowledge. There is an abundant and transcendent excellency in the doctrine of Christ, or the Christian religion above all the knowledge of nature, and improvements of human wisdom; for it is suited to the case of fallen sinners, and furnishes them with all they need and all they can desire and hope for, with all saving wisdom and saving grace. 2. He shows how he had quitted his privileges as a Jew and a Pharisee: Yea doubtless; his expression rises with a holy triumph and elevation, alla men oun ge kai. There are five particles in the original: But indeed even also do I count all things but loss. He had spoken before of those things, his Jewish privileges: here he speaks of all things, all worldly enjoyments and mere outward privileges whatsoever, things of a like kind or any other kind which could stand in competition with Christ for the throne in his heart, or pretend to merit and desert. There he had said that he did count them but loss; but it might be asked, "Did he continue still in the same mind, did he not repent his renouncing them?" No, now he speaks in the present tense: Yea doubtless, I do count them but loss. But it may be said, "It is easy to say so; but what would he do when he came to the trial?" Why he tells us that he had himself practised according to this estimate of the case: For whom I have suffered the loss of all things. He had quitted all his honours and advantages, as a Jew and a Pharisee, and submitted to all the disgrace and suffering which attended the profession and preaching of the gospel. When he embarked in the bottom of the Christian religion, he ventured all in it, and suffered the loss of all for the privileges of a Christian. Nay, he not only counted them loss, but dung, skubala - offals thrown to dogs; they are not only less valuable than Christ, but in the highest degree contemptible, when they come in competition with him. Note, The New Testament never speaks of saving grace in any terms of diminution, but on the contrary represents it as the fruits of the divine Spirit and the image of God in the soul of man; as a divine nature, and the seed of God: and faith is called precious faith; and meekness is in the sight of God of great price, Pe1 3:4; Pe2 1:1, etc.”

“Though I might also have confidence in the flesh,.... This he says, lest it should be objected to him, that the reason why he had no confidence in the flesh, and did not boast of it, was, because he could not; he had nothing to glory of, and put his confidence in, and therefore acted the common part of such persons, who despise what either they have not, or are ignorant of: but this was not the apostle's case, he had as much reason, and as good a foundation for trust in himself, his privileges and attainments, as any man had, and more; and his meaning here is not, that he might lawfully have confidence in the flesh, for that is criminal in every one, but that he had as good pretensions to it; and were it lawful, might with greater appearance of truth do it than some other persons, or indeed any other: if any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: the sense is, if there were any other person besides the false teachers he speaks of in Phi 3:2; that were of the judaizing sect, or any whatever of the Jewish nation, be he who he will, who thought within himself he had, or seemed to others to have (for all such confidence, and the grounds of it, are only in show and appearance, and in imagination, not in reality), reasons for boasting and trusting in himself and in his carnal privileges and performances, the apostle had more, and which he enumerates in Phi 3:5; not but that he might be exceeded by some in some one particular or another; as for instance, he was not of the tribe of Levi: nor of Judah; he was neither of the house of Aaron, nor of David; neither of the priestly line, nor of the blood royal; but taking all together, there was not a man in whom so many reasons met, for boasting and confidence in the flesh, as in himself.”

“If any other thinketh he may have confidence in the flesh, in being of the Jewish race and of their religion, I more; i.e. I have greater reasons to glory than they have, being circumcised of the stock of Israel, &c. — But what things, &c. as soon as I was miraculously called to the knowledge and faith of Christ. (Witham)”