Now I rejoice in the Lord exceedingly, that now at length your thought for me hath flourished again, as you did also think; but you were busied.

“I Have ofttimes said, that almsgiving hath been introduced not for the sake of the receivers, but of the givers, for the latter are they which make the greatest gain. And this Paul shows here also. In what way? The Philippians had sent him somewhat, after a long time, and had committed the same to Epaphroditus. See then, how when he is about to send Epaphroditus as the bearer of this Epistle, he praises them, and shows that this action was for the need, not of the receiver, but of the givers. This he doth, both that they who benefited him may not be lifted up with arrogance, and that they may become more zealous in well-doing, since they rather benefit themselves; and that they who receive may not fearlessly rush forward to receive, lest they meet with condemnation. For "it is more blessed," He saith, "to give than to receive." Why then does he say, "I rejoice in the Lord greatly"? Not with worldly rejoicing, saith he, nor with the joy of this life, but in the Lord. Not because I had refreshment, but because ye advanced; for this is my refreshment. Wherefore he also saith "greatly"; since this joy was not corporeal, nor on account of his own refreshment, but because of their advancement. And see how, when he had gently rebuked them on account of the times that were passed, he quickly throweth a shadow over this, and teacheth them constantly and always to remain in well doing. "Because at length," saith he. The words, "at length," show long time to have elapsed. "Ye have revived," as fruits which have shot forth, dried up, and afterwards shot forth. Here he showeth, that being at first blooming, then having faded, they again budded forth. So that the word "flourished again," has both rebuke and praise. For it is no small thing, that he who hath withered should flourish again. He showeth also, that it was from indolence all this had happened to them. But here he signifies, that even in former time they were wont to be zealous in these things. Wherefore he addeth, "your thought for me, wherein ye did indeed take thought." And lest you should think, that in other things too they had been more zealous, and had then withered, but in this thing alone, behold how he has added, "your thought for me." I apply the words, "now at length," only to this; for in other things it is not so. Here some one may enquire, how when he had said, "It is more blessed to give than to receive"; and, "These hands ministered to my necessities, and to them that were with me"; and again when writing to the Corinthians, "For it were good for me rather to die, than that any man should make my glorying void"; he suffereth his glorying to be made void? And how? By receiving. For if his glorying was, that he received not, how doth he now endure so to do? What is it then? Probably, he then did not receive on account of the false Apostles, "that wherein they glory," saith he, "they may be found even as we." And he said not "are," but "glory"; for they received but secretly. Wherefore he said, "wherein they glory." Wherefore he also said, "No man shall stop me of this glorying." And he said not simply, shall not stop me, but what? "in the regions of Achaia." And again, "I robbed other Churches, taking wages of them that I might minister unto you." Here he showed that he did receive. But Paul indeed received rightly, having so great a work; if in truth he did receive. But they who work not, how can they receive? "Yet I pray," saith one. But there is no work. For this may be done together with work. "But I fast." Neither is this work. For see this blessed one, preaching in many places, and working too. "But ye lacked opportunity." What meaneth lacked opportunity? It came not; saith he, of indolence, but of necessity. Ye had it not in your hands, nor were in abundance. This is the meaning of, "Ye lacked opportunity." Thus most men speak, when the things of this life do not flow in to them abundantly, and are in short supply.”

“Above he showed how the faithful ought to conduct themselves for the future; here he commends them for a benefit bestowed on him in the past. And first he sets down the commendation; second he ends the epistle with a prayer and a salutation, at "But God," etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he commends them for the benefit bestowed; second he explains the benefit more fully, at "not as though," etc. Likewise the first part is divided into three sections, because first he sets down the joy conceived from their benefit; second he commends their benefit, at "that at length," etc.; third he excuses the delay, at "being occupied," etc. He says therefore: I admonish you to rejoice, but I have rejoiced because of the things you have done, not in the things themselves, but in the Lord. Hab. 3:18: "But I will rejoice in the Lord," etc. I have rejoiced, I say, greatly, because it was on account of my children. Then the matter of the joy is set down, at "that at length," etc. Good works are works of mercy, and they are called flowers, because just as fruit comes forth from a flower, so from these the enjoyment of the blessed life is received. Ecclus. 24:23: "My flowers are the fruit of honor and of honesty." When therefore a good work is interrupted, and afterward resumed, it is said to flower again. Now these people had at one time provided for the Apostle, and again now they have provided; therefore he says that they have flowered again. And he explains this, when he adds "to feel for me," that is, to have compassion for me. Above 1:7: "as it is right for me to feel this for you all," etc. 1 Macc. 10:20: "that you may feel with us the things that are ours, that you may keep friendship with us," etc. "As you also felt formerly," namely when you provided for me. And this "at length, at some time," because although late, yet at some time you did it. Rom. 1:10: "if somehow at length at some time I may have a prosperous journey," etc. Then when he says "being occupied," etc., he excuses the delay; as if he were to say: I do not impute it to negligence or fault, but to necessity, because you were occupied on account of the tribulations which you suffered. Ecclus. 40:1: "Great occupation is created for all men," etc. Then when he says "not as though on account of," etc., he explains the benefit, and first the cause of the joy; second the benefit by which they flowered, at "and you also know"; third he recalls the present benefit, at "but I have all things." Likewise first he excludes the estimated cause of the joy; second he declares his own constancy of mind, at "for I have learned," etc.; third he approves their beneficence, at "nevertheless you have done well." He says therefore: I do not rejoice on account of the want driven away by you, which was grievous. Is. 48:10: "I have chosen you in the furnace of poverty." But nevertheless it does not weigh down the mind, except of those who delight in riches, or who glory in substance. And this is so because the Apostle is not saddened by poverty, the reason for which is the constancy of his mind, which he sets down first, second its cause, at "I can do all things," etc. Likewise first he sets down constancy in a particular case, second generally in all things, at "everywhere," etc. He says therefore: I do not fear poverty, because I have learned, etc. Nothing so shows the mind of a perfect wise man, as that he knows how to make use of any state. For just as he is a good commander who works in any army according to its requirement, and the leather-worker who out of any hide makes the best shoes: so that man is perfect who knows how to make use of any state, so that if he is in a great one, he is not lifted up, and if in the least, he is not cast down. And therefore he says "I have learned," etc. Is. 50:5: "The Lord God has opened my ear, and I do not contradict, I have not gone back," etc. And this suffices, if I have little; if much, I know how to temper myself. And therefore he explains himself, saying "I know how to be humbled." Now humility sometimes denotes a certain virtue, Luke 14:12, and 18:14: "he who humbles himself shall be exalted"; sometimes a casting-down, Ps. 104:18: "they humbled his feet in fetters." And thus he speaks here, saying "I know how to be humbled," that is, to bear abjection moderately, as is fitting. And because men are exalted through riches and are weighed down through poverty, therefore he calls the exaltation "abundance." And in each there is danger, because from abundance the mind is raised up against God, from poverty it is cast down. And therefore it is said Prov. 30:8: "Give me neither poverty nor riches." But the Apostle speaks better, because by virtue he knows how to make use of each, and this "everywhere," that is in every place, in affairs, states, and conditions, "I am instructed." 2 Cor. 6:4: "in all things let us exhibit ourselves as the ministers of God," etc. Then when he says "I can do all things," etc., he sets down the cause of his constancy, saying "I can do all things," as if he were to say: I could not sustain these insults, unless the hand of God were strengthening me. Ez. 3:14: "the hand of the Lord was with me." Is. 40:31: "they who hope in the Lord shall have strength, they shall take up wings like eagles," etc. But is what we have sent then superfluous, since you know how to be in want? No, because although I know how to suffer want, which is a virtue, nevertheless the assistance ought not to be withheld from me. Rom. 12:13: "sharing in the necessities of the saints." Heb. 10:34: "for you had compassion also on them that were in bands." And thus the cause of the joy is clear. Second he recalls the past benefit, at "and you know." For from certain ones he was accepting nothing, namely from the Corinthians and the Thessalonians, and because the Corinthians were avaricious, and would have ministered with disturbance, and because the Thessalonians were given over to idleness, he labored, giving them an example of laboring. But these were good both in his absence and in his presence. Hence he says 2 Cor. 11:8: "I despoiled other churches, taking wages for your ministry." By reason of the spiritual thing given and the temporal thing received. 1 Cor. 9:11: "If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we reap your carnal things?" "Because even to Thessalonica," etc. And this is an argument that the Pope can receive from one church for the aid of others, but not without any cause whatsoever. Now it must be known, that when someone gives something to someone, two things are to be considered, namely the substance of the gift and the merit of the giver. He who rejoices over temporal things, rejoices over the substance of the gift, and seeks only the giver, and this one is a hireling; but he who seeks the merit of the giver, seeks the fruit of virtue and justice, and such a one is a shepherd. "The fruit," I say, "which abounds in your account." "Account" is said in two ways. Either according as it is a power of the soul, and thus every virtue belongs to reason. Rom. 12:1: "your reasonable service." Sometimes it is reasoning and computation. Matt. 18:23: "who wished to settle accounts with his servants." Therefore he speaks of abundance "in account," because they gave more than they were bound to; because some only gave in his presence, but these were even sending to Rome. "But I have the things which you sent." "I am filled, having received," namely these things, "which you sent, an odor," etc. Lev. 3:5 and 4:31: "offer a holocaust for an odor of sweetness to the Lord." For the devotion of those offering is a sweet odor to God, and among all sacrifices alms are worth much. Heb. 13:16: "But do not forget beneficence and communion, for by such sacrifices God is won over." Then when he says "But God," etc., he finishes the epistle with a prayer, and first he sets down the prayer, "But my God." God is one for all through creation and power, but "mine," because I serve him singularly. Rom. 1:9: "for God is my witness, whom I serve." "May he fulfill," etc., because you have fulfilled mine. And this the Lord is able to do, because he abounds according to riches. Rom. 10:12: "the same Lord over all, rich unto all who call upon him," etc. And this is true "in glory," namely his own, because there the whole desire will be fulfilled. Ps. 16:15: "I shall be satisfied when your glory shall appear." Ps. 102, v. 5: "who fills your desire with good things." And this is "in Christ," that is, through Christ. 2 Pet. 1:4: "through whom he has granted to us the greatest and precious things." "And for all these things, to God" — the Trinity — "and to our Father, be glory." 1 Tim. 1:17: "to God alone be honor and glory forever and ever." An "age" is a space or duration of the generation or memory of men. Having first set down the prayer, and second the giving of thanks, third he sets down the salutation, saying "greet every saint," that is, the faithful in Christ, because sanctified through Christ. Heb. 13:12: "that he might sanctify the people by his own blood, he suffered outside the gate." "Especially," etc. And by this it is understood that he converted many from the household of Caesar. Above, ch. 1:13: "that my bonds became manifest in Christ in the whole praetorium, and to the rest of the men," etc. But although it is said in Matt. 11:8: "they who are clothed in soft garments are in the houses of kings," yet for the sake of promoting the good, and hindering the wicked, it seems lawful for the saints to dwell in the courts of kings, but not for the sake of delights and the desire of pleasures. And he says "who are of Caesar's household," so as to encourage them to joy and to faith. Then he sets down his own salutation by his own hand, saying "the grace of the Lord," etc.”

“In these verses we have the thankful grateful acknowledgment which the apostle makes of the kindness of the Philippians in sending him a present for his support, now that he was a prisoner at Rome. And here, I. He takes occasion to acknowledge their former kindnesses to him, and to make mention of them, Phi 4:15, Phi 4:16. Paul had a grateful spirit; for, though what his friends did for him was nothing in comparison of what he deserved from them and the obligations he had laid upon them, yet he speaks of their kindness as if it had been a piece of generous charity, when it was really far short of a just debt. If they had each of them contributed half their estates to him, they had not given him too much, since they owed to him even their own souls; and yet, when they send a small present to him, how kindly does he take it, how thankfully does he mention it, even in this epistle which was to be left upon record, and read in the churches, through all ages; so that wherever this epistle shall be read there shall this which they did to Paul be told for a memorial of them. Surely never was present so well repaid. He reminds them that in the beginning of the gospel no church communicated with him as to giving and receiving but they only, Phi 4:15. They not only maintained him comfortably while he was with them, but when he departed from Macedonia they sent tokens of their kindness after him; and this when no other church did so. None besides sent after him of their carnal things, in consideration of what they had reaped of his spiritual things. In works of charity, we are ready to ask what other people do. But the church of the Philippians never considered that. It redounded so much the more to their honour that they were the only church who were thus just and generous. Even in Thessalonica (after he had departed from Macedonia) you sent once and again to my necessity, Phi 4:16. Observe, 1. It was but little which they sent; they sent only to his necessity, just such things as he had need of; perhaps it was according to their ability, and he did not desire superfluities nor dainties. 2. It is an excellent thing to see those to whom God has abounded in the gifts of his grace abounding in grateful returns to his people and ministers, according to their own ability and their necessity: You sent once and again. Many people make it an excuse for their charity that they have given once; why should the charge come upon them again? But the Philippians sent once and again; they often relieved and refreshed him in his necessities. He makes this mention of their former kindness, not only out of gratitude, but for their encouragement. II. He excuses their neglect of late. It seems, for some time they had not sent to enquire after him, or sent him any present; but now at the last their care of him flourished again (Phi 4:10), like a tree in the spring, which seemed all the winter to be quite dead. Now, in conformity to the example of his great Master, instead of upbraiding them for their neglect, he makes an excuse for them: Wherein you were also careful, but you lacked opportunity. How could they lack opportunity, if they had been resolved upon it? They might have sent a messenger on purpose. But the apostle is willing to suppose, in favour of them, that they would have done it if a fair opportunity had offered. How contrary is this to the behaviour of many to their friends, by whom neglects which really are excusable are resented very heinously, when Paul excused that which he had reason enough to resent. III. He commends their present liberality: Notwithstanding, you have well done that you did communicate with my affliction, Phi 4:14. It is a good work to succour and help a good minister in trouble. Here see what is the nature of true Christian sympathy; not only to be concerned for our friends in their troubles, but to do what we can to help them. They communicated with his affliction, in relieving him under it. He who says, Be you warmed, be you filled, and giveth not those things they have need of, what doth it profit? Jam 2:16. He rejoiced greatly in it (Phi 4:10), because it was an evidence of their affection to him and the success of his ministry among them. When the fruit of their charity abounded towards the apostle, it appeared that the fruit of his ministry abounded among them. IV. He takes care to obviate the bad use some might make of his taking so much notice of what was sent him. It did not proceed either from discontent and distrust (Phi 4:11) or from covetousness and love of the world, Phi 4:12. 1. It did not come from discontent, or distrust of Providence: Not that I speak in respect of want (Phi 4:11); not in respect of any want he felt, nor of any want he feared. As to the former, he was content with the little he had, and that satisfied him; as to the latter, he depended upon the providence of God to provide for him from day to day, and that satisfied him: so that he did not speak in respect of want any way. For I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content. We have here an account of Paul's learning, not that which he got at the feet of Gamaliel, but that which he got at the feet of Christ. He had learnt to be content; and that was the lesson he had as much need to learn as most men, considering the hardships and sufferings with which he was exercised. He was in bonds, and imprisonments, and necessities, often; but in all he had learnt to be content, that is, to bring his mind to his condition, and make the best of it. - I know both how to be abased and I know how to abound, Phi 4:12. This is a special act of grace, to accommodate ourselves to every condition of life, and carry an equal temper of mind through all the varieties of our state. (1.) To accommodate ourselves to an afflicted condition - to know how to be abased, how to be hungry, how to suffer want, so as not to be overcome by the temptations of it, either to lose our comfort in God or distrust his providence, or to take any indirect course for our own supply. (2.) To a prosperous condition - to know how to abound, how to be full, so as not to be proud, or secure, or luxurious. And this is as hard a lesson as the other; for the temptations of fulness and prosperity are not less than those of affliction and want. But how must we learn it? I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me, Phi 4:13. We have need of strength from Christ, to enable us to perform not only those duties which are purely Christian, but even those which are the fruit of moral virtue. We need his strength to teach us to be content in every condition. The apostle had seemed to boast of himself, and of his own strength: I know how to be abased (Phi 4:12); but here he transfers all the praise to Christ. "What do I talk of knowing how to be abased, and how to abound? It is only through Christ who strengthens me that I can do it, not in my own strength." So we are required to be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might (Eph 6:10), and to be strong in the grace which is in Christ Jesus (Ti2 2:1); and we are strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man, Eph 3:16. The word in the original is a participle of the present tense, en tō endunamounti me Christō, and denotes a present and continued act; as if he had said, "Through Christ, who is strengthening me, and does continually strengthen me; it is by his constant and renewed strength I am enabled to act in every thing; I wholly depend upon him for all my spiritual power." 2. It did not come from covetousness, or an affection to worldly wealth: "Not because I desired a gift (Phi 4:17): that is, I welcome your kindness, not because it adds to my enjoyments, but because it adds to your account." He desired not so much for his own sake, but theirs: "I desire fruit that may abound to your account, that is, that you may be enabled to make such a good use of your worldly possessions that you may give an account of them with joy." It is not with any design to draw more from you, but to encourage you to such an exercise of beneficence as will meet with a glorious reward hereafter. "For my part," says he, "I have all, and abound, Phi 4:18. What can a man desire more than enough? I do not desire a gift for the gift's sake, for I have all, and abound." They sent him a small token, and he desired no more; he was not solicitous for a present superfluity, or a future supply: I am full, having received from Epaphroditus the things which were sent by you. Note, A good man will soon have enough of this world; not only of living in it, but of receiving from it. A covetous worldling, if he has ever so much, would still have more; but a heavenly Christian, though he has little, has enough. V. The apostle assures them that God did accept, and would recompense, their kindness to him. 1. He did accept it: It is an odour of a sweet smell, a sacrifice acceptable, well-pleasing to God. Not a sacrifice of atonement, for none makes atonement for sin but Christ; but a sacrifice of acknowledgment, and well-pleasing to God. It was more acceptable to God as it was the fruit of their grace than it was to Paul as it was the supply of his want. With such sacrifices God is well pleased, Heb 13:16. 2. He would recompense it: But my God shall supply all your wants according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus, Phi 4:19. He does as it were draw a bill upon the exchequer in heaven, and leaves it to God to make them amends for the kindness they had shown him. "He shall do it, not only as your God, but as my God, who takes what is done to me as done to himself. You supplied my needs, according to your poverty; and he shall supply yours, according to his riches." But still it is by Christ Jesus; through him we have grace to do that which is good, and through him we must expect the reward of it. Not of debt, but of grace; for the more we do for God the more we are indebted to him, because we receive the more from him.”

“But I rejoiced in the Lord greatly,.... The apostle proceeds to the last part of this epistle, and to take notice of the present which these Philippians had sent him, on account of which this his rejoicing was; and which was not small but great, and was not of a carnal but spiritual kind; it was a joy in the Holy Ghost, which is opposed to meats and drinks, and earthly enjoyments; it was a joy in the Lord; "in our Lord", as the Syriac version renders it; it was not so much on account of the nature, substance, quantity or quality of the things sent him, and the suitableness of them to his present necessity; but because this thing was of the Lord, he had put it into their hearts to do it, and had given them not only ability, but a willing mind, and had wrought in them both to will and to do; and because what they did they did for the sake of Christ, and to him as an apostle of his, and in obedience to Christ, and with a view to promote his cause and interest, honour and glory: that now at the last your care of me hath flourished again; which supposes that they had formerly, at the first preaching of the Gospel, showed great respect to him, and took great care of him, as appears from Phi 4:15, but that for some time past, and it seems for a considerable while, they had dropped it, or at least had not shown it; but that now it revived again, and was seen in the present they had now sent him. The allusion is to trees, which in the summer season bear much fruit, in autumn cast their leaves, and in the winter are entirely bare, and in the spring of the year revive again, and put forth leaves and fruit: and just so it is with the saints, they are compared to trees, and are called trees of righteousness, Isa 61:3, and are fruitful ones, Jer 23:3; but they have their winter seasons, when they are barren and unfruitful, and look as if they were dead; but when it is a spring time with them they revive again, as in the exercise of their faith and hope in Christ, so of their love to him, and to one another, and the ministers of the Gospel; when the south wind of the Spirit blows, the sun of righteousness arises, and, the dews of divine grace fall upon them; and such a revival was now in this church; and this was what the apostle so much rejoiced in, not so much for the gift bestowed on him, as for the fruit that appeared in them; see Phi 4:17; but whereas he had said that this care of him flourished again, "at last"; lest this should be thought as finding fault with them, and bringing a charge against them, he corrects himself by adding, wherein ye were also careful, but ye lacked opportunity; signifying that he believed they had entertained the same sentiments of him, had the same affection and inward care for him all along; but they had no opportunity of showing it, he being at such a distance, and they having no convenient or proper persons to send to him; or were hindered through multiplicity of business on their hands, that they could not attend to him; and so the Vulgate Latin version renders it, "but ye were busied", or taken up and employed in business; or it was for want of ability; for the words will bear to be rendered, "but ye lacked ability"; and to this sense does the Syriac version render it, , "but ye were not sufficient"; or had not a sufficiency, were not able to do it, and therefore to be easily excused.”

“But I rejoiced in the Lord - Every good comes from God, either immediately from his providence or from his grace; therefore the apostle thanks God for the kindness of the Philippians towards him; for it was God that gave them the power, and directed their hearts to use it. Hath flourished again - They had helped him before, Phi 2:25; they had ceased for a time, and now they began again. This is evidently designed by the apostle, as the word ανεθαλετε implies, which is a metaphor taken from the reviviscence of flowers in spring which seemed dead in winter. For the time in which they were apparently remiss he makes a delicate apology: Ye were careful, but ye lacked opportunity; or rather ηκαιρεισθε, ye had not ability, ye wanted the means; as the word sometimes implies.”

“Hath flourished again. Literally, that you have flourished again, to think or care for me, which appears by your sending me a supply of money. (Witham) — From hence it would appear, that the Philippians had in some respect been wanting in attention to this apostle: that their former liberality, which for a time had been slack and dead, had again revived.”

“But--transitional conjunction. But "now" to pass to another subject. in the Lord--He views everything with reference to Christ. at the last--"at last"; implying he was expecting their gift, not from a selfish view, but as a "fruit" of their faith, and to "abound" to their account (Phi 4:11, Phi 4:17). Though long in coming, owing to Epaphroditus' sickness and other delays, he does not imply their gift was too late. your care . . . hath flourished again--Greek, "Ye have flourished again (revived, as trees sprouting forth again in spring) in your care for me." wherein ye were also careful--in respect to which (revival, namely, the sending of a supply to me) "ye were also (all along) careful, but ye lacked opportunity"; whether from want of means or want of a messenger. Your "lack of service" (Phi 2:30), was owing to your having "lacked opportunity."”