The interpretation timeline
Philippians 4:11 Douay-Rheims

I speak not as it were for want. For I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, to be content therewith.

A.D. 215 – 1871 9 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
215
A.D.
c. A.D. 150–215
“And again, to him who desires to become a Gnostic, it is written, "But be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in love, in faith, in purity." For perfection in faith differs, I think, from ordinary faith. And the divine apostle furnishes the rule for the Gnostic in these words, writing as follows: "For I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, to be content. I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound. Everywhere and in all things I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to lack. I can do all things through Him who strengtheneth me."”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"Not that I speak in respect of want." I said, saith he, "now at length," and I rebuked you, not seeking mine own, nor censuring you on this account, as if I were in want: for I sought it not on this account. Whence is this, O Paul, that thou makest no vain boasting? To the Corinthians he saith, "For we write none other things unto you, than what ye read or even acknowledge." And in this case he would not have spoken to them so as to be convicted, he would not, had he been making boasts, have spoken thus. He was speaking to those who knew the facts, with whom detection would have been a greater disgrace. "For I have learnt," saith he, "in whatsoever state I am, therein to be content." Wherefore, this is an object of discipline, and exercise, and care, for it is not easy of attainment, but very difficult, and a new thing.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“All sorts of people indeed can suffer poverty, but to "know how to suffer poverty" is a mark of greatness. Likewise, who is there who may not abound? But to "know how to abound" belongs to none but those who are not corrupted by abundance.”

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above he showed how the faithful ought to conduct themselves for the future; here he commends them for a benefit bestowed on him in the past. And first he sets down the commendation; second he ends the epistle with a prayer and a salutation, at "But God," etc. Concerning the first he does two things. First he commends them for the benefit bestowed; second he explains the benefit more fully, at "not as though," etc. Likewise the first part is divided into three sections, because first he sets down the joy conceived from their benefit; second he commends their benefit, at "that at length," etc.; third he excuses the delay, at "being occupied," etc. He says therefore: I admonish you to rejoice, but I have rejoiced because of the things you have done, not in the things themselves, but in the Lord. Hab. 3:18: "But I will rejoice in the Lord," etc. I have rejoiced, I say, greatly, because it was on account of my children. Then the matter of the joy is set down, at "that at length," etc. Good works are works of mercy, and they are called flowers, because just as fruit comes forth from a flower, so from these the enjoyment of the blessed life is received. Ecclus. 24:23: "My flowers are the fruit of honor and of honesty." When therefore a good work is interrupted, and afterward resumed, it is said to flower again. Now these people had at one time provided for the Apostle, and again now they have provided; therefore he says that they have flowered again. And he explains this, when he adds "to feel for me," that is, to have compassion for me. Above 1:7: "as it is right for me to feel this for you all," etc. 1 Macc. 10:20: "that you may feel with us the things that are ours, that you may keep friendship with us," etc. "As you also felt formerly," namely when you provided for me. And this "at length, at some time," because although late, yet at some time you did it. Rom. 1:10: "if somehow at length at some time I may have a prosperous journey," etc. Then when he says "being occupied," etc., he excuses the delay; as if he were to say: I do not impute it to negligence or fault, but to necessity, because you were occupied on account of the tribulations which you suffered. Ecclus. 40:1: "Great occupation is created for all men," etc. Then when he says "not as though on account of," etc., he explains the benefit, and first the cause of the joy; second the benefit by which they flowered, at "and you also know"; third he recalls the present benefit, at "but I have all things." Likewise first he excludes the estimated cause of the joy; second he declares his own constancy of mind, at "for I have learned," etc.; third he approves their beneficence, at "nevertheless you have done well." He says therefore: I do not rejoice on account of the want driven away by you, which was grievous. Is. 48:10: "I have chosen you in the furnace of poverty." But nevertheless it does not weigh down the mind, except of those who delight in riches, or who glory in substance. And this is so because the Apostle is not saddened by poverty, the reason for which is the constancy of his mind, which he sets down first, second its cause, at "I can do all things," etc. Likewise first he sets down constancy in a particular case, second generally in all things, at "everywhere," etc. He says therefore: I do not fear poverty, because I have learned, etc. Nothing so shows the mind of a perfect wise man, as that he knows how to make use of any state. For just as he is a good commander who works in any army according to its requirement, and the leather-worker who out of any hide makes the best shoes: so that man is perfect who knows how to make use of any state, so that if he is in a great one, he is not lifted up, and if in the least, he is not cast down. And therefore he says "I have learned," etc. Is. 50:5: "The Lord God has opened my ear, and I do not contradict, I have not gone back," etc. And this suffices, if I have little; if much, I know how to temper myself. And therefore he explains himself, saying "I know how to be humbled." Now humility sometimes denotes a certain virtue, Luke 14:12, and 18:14: "he who humbles himself shall be exalted"; sometimes a casting-down, Ps. 104:18: "they humbled his feet in fetters." And thus he speaks here, saying "I know how to be humbled," that is, to bear abjection moderately, as is fitting. And because men are exalted through riches and are weighed down through poverty, therefore he calls the exaltation "abundance." And in each there is danger, because from abundance the mind is raised up against God, from poverty it is cast down. And therefore it is said Prov. 30:8: "Give me neither poverty nor riches." But the Apostle speaks better, because by virtue he knows how to make use of each, and this "everywhere," that is in every place, in affairs, states, and conditions, "I am instructed." 2 Cor. 6:4: "in all things let us exhibit ourselves as the ministers of God," etc. Then when he says "I can do all things," etc., he sets down the cause of his constancy, saying "I can do all things," as if he were to say: I could not sustain these insults, unless the hand of God were strengthening me. Ez. 3:14: "the hand of the Lord was with me." Is. 40:31: "they who hope in the Lord shall have strength, they shall take up wings like eagles," etc. But is what we have sent then superfluous, since you know how to be in want? No, because although I know how to suffer want, which is a virtue, nevertheless the assistance ought not to be withheld from me. Rom. 12:13: "sharing in the necessities of the saints." Heb. 10:34: "for you had compassion also on them that were in bands." And thus the cause of the joy is clear. Second he recalls the past benefit, at "and you know." For from certain ones he was accepting nothing, namely from the Corinthians and the Thessalonians, and because the Corinthians were avaricious, and would have ministered with disturbance, and because the Thessalonians were given over to idleness, he labored, giving them an example of laboring. But these were good both in his absence and in his presence. Hence he says 2 Cor. 11:8: "I despoiled other churches, taking wages for your ministry." By reason of the spiritual thing given and the temporal thing received. 1 Cor. 9:11: "If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we reap your carnal things?" "Because even to Thessalonica," etc. And this is an argument that the Pope can receive from one church for the aid of others, but not without any cause whatsoever. Now it must be known, that when someone gives something to someone, two things are to be considered, namely the substance of the gift and the merit of the giver. He who rejoices over temporal things, rejoices over the substance of the gift, and seeks only the giver, and this one is a hireling; but he who seeks the merit of the giver, seeks the fruit of virtue and justice, and such a one is a shepherd. "The fruit," I say, "which abounds in your account." "Account" is said in two ways. Either according as it is a power of the soul, and thus every virtue belongs to reason. Rom. 12:1: "your reasonable service." Sometimes it is reasoning and computation. Matt. 18:23: "who wished to settle accounts with his servants." Therefore he speaks of abundance "in account," because they gave more than they were bound to; because some only gave in his presence, but these were even sending to Rome. "But I have the things which you sent." "I am filled, having received," namely these things, "which you sent, an odor," etc. Lev. 3:5 and 4:31: "offer a holocaust for an odor of sweetness to the Lord." For the devotion of those offering is a sweet odor to God, and among all sacrifices alms are worth much. Heb. 13:16: "But do not forget beneficence and communion, for by such sacrifices God is won over." Then when he says "But God," etc., he finishes the epistle with a prayer, and first he sets down the prayer, "But my God." God is one for all through creation and power, but "mine," because I serve him singularly. Rom. 1:9: "for God is my witness, whom I serve." "May he fulfill," etc., because you have fulfilled mine. And this the Lord is able to do, because he abounds according to riches. Rom. 10:12: "the same Lord over all, rich unto all who call upon him," etc. And this is true "in glory," namely his own, because there the whole desire will be fulfilled. Ps. 16:15: "I shall be satisfied when your glory shall appear." Ps. 102, v. 5: "who fills your desire with good things." And this is "in Christ," that is, through Christ. 2 Pet. 1:4: "through whom he has granted to us the greatest and precious things." "And for all these things, to God" — the Trinity — "and to our Father, be glory." 1 Tim. 1:17: "to God alone be honor and glory forever and ever." An "age" is a space or duration of the generation or memory of men. Having first set down the prayer, and second the giving of thanks, third he sets down the salutation, saying "greet every saint," that is, the faithful in Christ, because sanctified through Christ. Heb. 13:12: "that he might sanctify the people by his own blood, he suffered outside the gate." "Especially," etc. And by this it is understood that he converted many from the household of Caesar. Above, ch. 1:13: "that my bonds became manifest in Christ in the whole praetorium, and to the rest of the men," etc. But although it is said in Matt. 11:8: "they who are clothed in soft garments are in the houses of kings," yet for the sake of promoting the good, and hindering the wicked, it seems lawful for the saints to dwell in the courts of kings, but not for the sake of delights and the desire of pleasures. And he says "who are of Caesar's household," so as to encourage them to joy and to faith. Then he sets down his own salutation by his own hand, saying "the grace of the Lord," etc.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Not that I speak in respect of want,.... Either of want of will in them; of their slowness and backwardness in their care of him, postponing him to others, caring for him last of all; this gave him no uneasiness, he did not take it ill, knowing and owning himself to be less than the least of all saints: or of his own want before this present came; and his sense is, that he did not express himself with so much joy, because of the penury and distress he was in before the things came to him which they sent; for he was not in want; though he had nothing, he possessed all things, and was as happy, and in as comfortable a frame, and in as much content then as now: for I have learned in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content; or "to be sufficient", as the Vulgate Latin version renders it; or that that is sufficient for me which I have, as the Syriac version renders it; for the word here used signifies to be self-sufficient, or to have a sufficiency in one's self, which in the strict sense of the phrase is only true of God, who is "El-shaddai", God all-sufficient; but, in a lower sense, is true of such who are contented with their present state and condition, with such things as they have, be they more or less, and think that they have enough, as old Jacob did, Gen 33:11; and such persons have a sort of an all-sufficiency in them; they are thankful for every thing they have, be it little or more, and in every state, whether of adversity or prosperity; and quietly and patiently submit to the will of God, and cheerfully take and bear whatever is assigned them as their portion; and such an one was the apostle: he was not only content with food and raiment, and such things as he had, but even when he had nothing at all; when he had neither bread to eat nor clothes to wear; when he was in hunger and thirst, in cold and nakedness, as was sometimes his case; and therefore he does not say here, that he had learnt to be content with such things as he had, but , "in what I am": and this he had not by nature, but by grace; it was not natural, but adventitious to him; it was not what he had acquired by his industry, but what he had "learned"; and that not in the school of nature and reason, while an unregenerate man; nor at the feet of Gamaliel, while he was training up under him in the law of Moses, and in the traditions of the elders; but he learned it of God, and was taught it by the revelation of Christ, and under the teachings of the Spirit of God, and that in the school of affliction, by a train of experiences, of many sorrows, afflictions, and distresses; for this lesson is learned quite contrary to all the rules and reasons among men, not by prosperity, but by adversity: many are the things that may excite and encourage to the exercise of this heavenly grace, where it is wrought; as the consideration of the unalterable will of God, according to which every man's state and condition is settled, and therefore what God has made crooked can never be made straight; and of our case when we came into the world, and what that will be when we go out of it, naked and bare of this world's things; and of our unworthiness of the least mercy at the hand of God: add to which, the consideration of God being our portion and exceeding great reward; of having an interest in Christ and all things in him; and of the profits and pleasures of a life of contentment; and of the promises which God has made to such; and of the future glory and happiness which will shortly be enjoyed: so that a believer may say, who has the smallest pittance of earthly enjoyments, this, with a covenant God, with an interest in Christ, with grace here and heaven hereafter, is enough.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Not that I speak in respect of want - I am quite unconcerned in this respect; leaving the whole of my support, while bound for the testimony of Jesus, to the providence of God. For I have learned - I am so satisfied with the wise providence and goodness of God, that I know whatever he determines is the best; and therefore I am perfectly contented that he should govern the world in that way which seems best to his godly wisdom. How true is the proverb, A contented mind is a continual feast! What do we get by murmuring and complaining?”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“I have learned….to be content therewith. Literally, to be sufficient. I know how to be in a low condition. (Witham)”
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“G. iK^ipha-d-i S'L V. occupati autem eratis. The term literally means a want of opportunity.”
1871
A.D.
1871
“I have learned--The I in Greek is emphatical. I leave it to others if they will, to be discontented. I, for my part, have learned, by the teaching of the Holy Spirit, and the dealings of Providence (Heb 5:8), to be content in every state. content--The Greek, literally expresses "independent of others, and having sufficiency in one's self." But Christianity has raised the term above the haughty self-sufficiency of the heathen Stoic to the contentment of the Christian, whose sufficiency is not in self, but in God (Co2 3:5; Ti1 6:6, Ti1 6:8; Heb 13:5; compare Jer 2:36; Jer 45:5).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.