Commentary on 1 Timothy (Super I Epistolam ad Timotheum Lectura)

“In the hand of God is the power of the earth, and every iniquity of the nations is execrable, and he will raise up a useful ruler over it in time. Ecclus. 10:4. These words are fitting to the subject matter of this epistle. For before this he instructed the Church in those things which pertain to her unity; here he instructs the rulers of the Church themselves, who are as it were her principal members. Concerning this, two things are to be considered: the instruction, and the usefulness. The instruction is in God, because in the hand of God, etc. And this in three ways: because it arises from him. Rom. 13:1: there is no power but from God. Likewise, because it ought to be regulated according to God. Prov. 8:15: by me kings reign, and the makers of laws decree just things. Likewise, because their power is founded according to the disposition of God. Dan. 2:21: and he changes times and ages, transfers kingdoms and establishes them. Likewise the usefulness of rulers is shown, because it is for restraining the wickedness of men, since every iniquity of the nations is execrable. The law is not laid down for the just. Rulers of the law must conduct themselves toward evils in three ways. First, that they hold them in hatred in their heart. 2 Macc. 3:1: holding evils in hatred of soul, etc. Second, that they forbid them from being done. Prov. 20:8: the king who sits on the throne of judgment scatters all evil. Third, that they punish deeds done. Rom. 13:4: for he is the minister of God, an avenger unto wrath against him who does evil. Fourth, the usefulness is to be considered, where it says a useful ruler, etc. And a ruler is useful with respect to three things, which are noted at Ecclus. 49:17: Joseph, prince of his brothers, that he may sustain the people through power. Is. 19:4: and a strong king will rule over them, etc. Ruler of his brothers, by directing through wisdom. Is. 32:8: the prince will think on things worthy of a prince, etc. Ecclus. 10:24: in the midst of his brothers is their ruler. The establishment of the people, that he may restrain them from unjust things through justice, Ps. 17:27: you will save the humble people, and you will humble the eyes of the proud, etc. And thus the subject matter of these epistles is plain, for it is directed to the instruction of the rulers of the faithful people, among whom certain ones are set over others in spiritual matters, such as the prelates of the Churches, whom he instructs first; certain others, however, in temporal matters, whom he admonishes second, and this in the epistle to Philemon. Concerning the first, there are three epistles, corresponding to three things that belong to a prelate, of which the first is that he govern the people; the second, that he suffer on behalf of the people subject to him; the third, that he restrain evildoers. The first is in the first epistle to Timothy; the second in the second, where he treats of martyrdom; the third in the epistle to Titus, where he treats and teaches how to avoid heretics, as is also evident in the prologues to the epistles.”

“This epistle is divided into the salutation and the epistolary narration, at "as I asked." Concerning the first he does three things: first the person saluting is set down, second the person saluted, third the goods wished for. Now he describes the person saluting, first from the name "Paul," which befits authority on account of two things. For in the apostolate there are two things, namely the height of power, to which the humble are exalted. 1 Kings 15:17: "when you were little in your own eyes, you were made head over the tribes of Israel." And "Paul" means small. Likewise the clarity of wisdom, and this the Lord grants to the little ones. Matthew 11:25: "you have revealed these things to little ones," etc. Second, from authority, because "apostle," that is, sent. John 20:21: "as the Father sent me." 1 Corinthians 9:2: "you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord." Third, from the origin of this authority, whence he says "of Jesus Christ according to the command of God," etc. Acts 13:2: "separate for me Barnabas and Saul unto the work for which I have taken them." 1 Kings 13:14: "the Lord sought for himself a man according to his own heart," etc. From which it is clear that prelates are bound by necessity of precept to those things which belong to their proper office. 1 Corinthians 9:16: "for woe is to me if I do not preach the gospel." And "of Christ Jesus our hope," who is our hope, that we may come to him. Philippians 1:23: "having a desire to be dissolved, and to be with Christ," etc. Or "of our hope," because through him we hope to obtain the eternal goods. 1 Peter 1:3: "he has regenerated us unto a living hope," etc. Romans 15:4: "that through the consolation of the Scriptures we may have hope." He describes the person saluted in three ways. First from the name, when he says "to Timothy," concerning whom see Acts 16. Likewise from affection, saying "beloved." Philippians 2:20: "I have no one so like-minded," etc. Likewise from sonship, saying "son in the faith," namely converted by him. 1 Corinthians 4:17: "I have sent to you Timothy, my dearest son, and faithful in the Lord," etc. Then first he sets down the goods wished for, and afterward shows from whom they are. But it must be known that in the other epistles two are set down, here three, because prelates need more. And therefore he says "grace and mercy," first for himself, and then for others. And here "mercy" is taken for the remission of sins, because this is from the mercy of God; but "grace" for the gift of graces, which prelates need. Or "grace," as in the others, for justifying grace, but "mercy" for the divine gift exalting in spiritual charisms. Wisdom 4:15: "the grace of God and his mercy is upon his saints, and his regard is upon his elect." And "peace," namely with you, and through you with others. Psalm 71:3: "let the mountains receive peace." But from where? "From God," that they may give it to the people. James 1:17: "every best gift, and every perfect gift is from above, descending from the Father of lights." And "Christ Jesus our Lord," namely through whom he has given to us the greatest and precious promises, 2 Peter 1:2.”

“Here begins the epistolary narrative. And this epistle is, as it were, a pastoral rule, which the Apostle hands down to Timothy, instructing him concerning all things that pertain to the governance of prelates, and in that order in which the intention ought to proceed. First, therefore, he instructs him concerning spiritual things to be ministered; second, concerning temporal things, in chapter IV, where it says "but the Spirit." Again, it pertains to a prelate, first, that he teach concerning the form of faith, lest the faith of his subjects be corrupted. Lk. 22:32: "I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not, and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren." Second, that he instruct them concerning the things pertaining to the worship of God, which cannot be, unless the faith be right. Therefore he first instructs concerning faith; second, concerning the worship of God, in chapter II, where it says "I beseech therefore"; third, he treats of the institution of offices, in chapter III, where it says "a faithful saying." Now it must be known that in the primitive Church there was a dangerous error of certain men saying that the observances of the law ought to be kept together with the Gospel, which the Apostle excludes, first by showing the condition of the law; second, he proves it by an experiment in himself, where it says "I give thanks." Concerning the first he does three things: first he shows what is to be repudiated concerning the law; second, what is to be accepted in it, where it says "now the end of the commandment"; third, he concludes as to the condition of the law, where it says "but we know that." Now what is to be repudiated in the law is what others wrongly added, not what was given by God, except now according to a carnal understanding; and first he teaches that false fables and traditions are to be repudiated; second, he assigns the reason, where it says "which questions." He says therefore: I say what you must do, just as I asked you, although I could command. Ecclus. 32:1: "Have they made thee ruler? Be not lifted up, be among them as one of them." "That thou shouldst charge some." Or otherwise: two things pertain to a prelate, that he restrain those who teach false things. And therefore he says "that they teach not otherwise." Gal. 1:9: "If any one preach a gospel to you besides that which you have received, let him be anathema." Deut. 4:2: "You shall not add to the word which I speak to you, neither shall you take away from it." Second, that if it should happen that some teach false things, he prohibit the people from giving heed to them; hence he says "nor give heed to fables and endless genealogies." Now there were certain heretics who, detesting the old testament, expounded that the Apostle himself repudiated it, mocking its histories, saying "fables and endless genealogies," etc. Against this Augustine says that the Apostle makes use of the histories and genealogies of the old testament. Gal. 4:22: "Abraham had two sons," etc. If therefore he reproved it, he would not make use of them. He says therefore "fables," meaning not the law given in writing, but by mouth, namely the Talmud: not what Moses handed down by mouth, but what others added, such as foolish fables — namely, that Adam had another wife, from whom they say demons were born. Matt. 15:6: "You have made void the commandment of God for your tradition." 2 Tim. 4:4: "and they will be turned unto fables." The reason for this is that they furnish "questions," that is, contentions. 2 Tim. 2:14: "contend not in words." Prov. 20:3: "It is an honor for a man to separate himself from contentions" — rather than the edification of God, which is in faith, namely when someone is confirmed in the truth of faith, to which all doctrine ought to tend. Then when he says "now the end," he shows what is to be held concerning the law. And concerning this he does two things: first he shows this; second, that there is danger for those who do not hold this, where it says "from which some," etc. Concerning the first it must be known that the old law is called the law of commandments, because it is contained in commands and precepts. Eph. 2:15: "making void the law of commandments by decrees." That, therefore, to which all the commandments of the law are ordered is especially to be held; and this is charity. Matt. 22:37: "Thou shalt love thy God with thy whole heart," etc.; and a little after: "on these two commandments the whole law depends, and the prophets." But how is charity the end of the commandment? To know this, two things must be considered. First, that all the precepts of the law concern acts of the virtues, and that through all the acts of the virtues one man is ordered to another. Second, that the object of one virtue is the end of another, because whenever one power is concerned with some end, all the things that belong to it are ordered to that end, as to their end; just as the bridle-making art is ordered to the equestrian art, because the office of the equestrian art is its end, and this in turn to the general's art. Now the theological virtues have the ultimate end as their object; but the others are concerned with the things that are ordered to the end. All the virtues, therefore, regard the theological virtues as their end. But among the theological virtues, that one has more of the character of an end which stands nearer to the ultimate end. Now faith shows him, hope makes one tend toward him, charity unites. Therefore all are ordered to charity, and thus charity is called the end of the precepts. But since the things that are ordered to the end dispose to the end, and the precepts are ordered to charity, therefore they dispose to it. Therefore he says "from a pure heart." For, to this end that the heart be pure, the precepts of the virtues are given, of which some are ordered to the manner of rectifying the passions — of which virtues, namely, the passions are the matter, as temperance, which orders concupiscence; meekness, anger; fortitude, fears and boldness. Now through these passions the purity of the heart is disturbed, and therefore these virtues make the heart pure. But is this required for charity? I respond. It must be said that it is, because it is impossible that an impure heart be prompt to charity, since to each thing that is lovable which is conformed to it. An impure heart loves that which suits it according to passion; therefore it is necessary that it be set free from the passions. Cant. 1:3: "the upright love thee." There are other virtues which rectify man toward his neighbor, and from this it follows that he has a good conscience, because he does not do to another what he does not wish to be done to himself. Matt. 7:12: "All things therefore whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them." And therefore the things that are against one's neighbor are against conscience. Hence he says "and a good conscience." He, therefore, who does not have a good conscience cannot love God purely, because he who does not have a good conscience fears punishment. But fear is not in charity, but flees God, and is not united to him. And therefore the precepts which rectify conscience well dispose one to charity. There are other virtues for having true faith, namely, the virtues by which we worship God, namely those of latria and the like, which are ordered to removing errors, and to confirming in hearts the firmness of faith concerning God. For those who do not have true faith cannot love God, because he who believes falsely concerning God no longer loves God. For he who does not believe does not love, because affection is not fixed except on that which the intellect shows. And therefore the things that produce true faith are ordered to charity. And therefore he says "from a pure heart," because they produce this. Matt. 5:8: "Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God." "And a good conscience." 2 Cor. 1:12: "our glory is this, the testimony of our conscience." "And faith unfeigned," that is, true. And therefore the virtues and precepts are ordered to the end which is charity, which is taken according to these three, etc.”

“Above he showed the dignity and usefulness of the virtues; here he declares the necessity of these, because whoever departs from these falls into the danger of false doctrine. And concerning this he does two things: first, the falsity of the doctrine into which they fall is set forth; second, the condition of those who teach falsely, at the words wishing to be. He says therefore: the end of the commandment, etc., and these are the chief things of the law, from which certain persons depart. Ps. 11:2: they have spoken vain things, etc. And note that departure from charity is the cause of false doctrine, because those who do not love charity fall into falsehood. 2 Thess. 2:11: who did not believe the truth, but consented to iniquity. Likewise those who let go of purity of heart. For those having a heart infected with the passions judge according to the affection of these, and not according to God. 1 Cor. 2:14: the animal man does not perceive the things that are of God, etc. Likewise those having an evil conscience, because they cannot rest in the truth. And hence it is that they seek false things, that they may rest in them. Below, in the same place: having faith and a good conscience. Likewise he who has a feigned trust. Is. 21:2: he who is unbelieving acts unfaithfully. Then, when he says wishing, etc., the condition of those teaching falsely is set forth, and first their disordered ambition; second their defect. As to the first he says wishing to be, etc. Matt. 23:6: they love the first places at feasts, and to be called by men, Rabbi, etc. James 3:1: be not many masters, etc. As to the second he says understanding neither. Ps. 81:5: they have not known, neither have they understood; they walk on in darkness. Wis. 5:6: the sun of understanding has not risen upon us. Nor the things which they speak by authorities, which they do not understand, nor the things about which they affirm, namely, by way of concluding. Then, when he says but we know, etc., he sets forth the condition of the law as to two things. First, as to the goodness of the law; second, as to the end and intention of the lawgiver, at the words knowing. He says therefore we know, namely with certainty, that the law is good, not evil, as the heretics say. Ps. 18:7: the law of the Lord is unspotted, etc. Rom. 7:12: the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. But it happens that someone uses a good thing badly. Since therefore the law is good, it is required that man use it well. And therefore he says if a man use it rightly. Otherwise death comes to him from it, as is said in Rom. 8. For in the law there are certain moral precepts, and certain ceremonial ones. The ceremonial ones indeed were given as a figure of Christ and the Church, but they need to be understood not only carnally, but also spiritually; and as a figure of things to come, and so that you may know that they are not to be kept forever, but cease when the truth comes. Jer. 31:31: and I will strike with the house of Israel and the house of Judah a new covenant, not according to the covenant which I made with your fathers, etc. And thus the Gloss expounds it. But the Apostle seems to be speaking of the moral precepts, because he adds that the law was made because of sins, and these are the moral precepts. The lawful use of these is that man not attribute to them more than what is contained in them. The law was given so that sin might be known. Rom. 7:7: for unless the law had said, you shall not covet, I would not have known concupiscence, etc.; which is said in the Decalogue. There is not, therefore, in them hope of justification, but in faith alone. Rom. 3:28: we reckon a man to be justified by faith without the works of the law. Then, when he says knowing, he shows the condition of the law as to the intention of the lawgiver; and first he sets forth the supposed intention; second he sets forth the true intention, at the words but for the unjust. The supposed intention is excluded, when he says for the just, etc. Here there could be a twofold false understanding. One, that the just man does not keep the law, which is false, because unless he kept it as to the moral precepts, he would not be just. Hence Christ too was made under the law. The other, that the just man is not bound to the precepts of the law, and would not sin if he acted against them. But the following sense is true, supposing that what is imposed on someone is imposed as a burden; for the law is not imposed on the just as a burden, because their interior habit inclines them to that to which the law inclines, and therefore it is not a burden to them. Rom. 2:14: they are a law to themselves. Or otherwise: the law was not made for the just, but for the unjust; as if to say: if all were just, there would be no need of giving a law, because all would be a law to themselves. The intention of good men ought to be that they lead others to the virtues. Now some are of themselves well disposed to the virtues; others have a mind well disposed, but through another, and for these a fatherly admonition suffices, not a coercive one; others, however, are well disposed neither of themselves nor through another; therefore for them a law is altogether necessary, as is clear in the Ethics. Then, when he says but for the unjust, etc., he sets forth the true intention; and first he describes in general those for whom the law is necessary; second in particular, at the words for murderers of fathers. Now it should be known that, as is said in 1 John 3:4, all sin is iniquity, and therefore it is opposed to some right. But since right is twofold, namely natural and positive, to the natural is opposed what is evil in itself, and to the positive is opposed what is evil because forbidden. As to the first he says but for the unjust, namely those who act against natural right. Is. 24:5: they have transgressed the laws, changed the right, broken the everlasting covenant, etc. As to the second he says not subject, namely to human precept. Rom. 1:30: disobedient to parents. And these two regard the notion of sin. He then sets forth others, which are taken by comparison to that, and this is either against God, or against one's neighbor, or in oneself. Against God it is called impiety, because piety implies the worship of God; therefore he says for the ungodly. Against one's neighbor, thus he says for sinners. Ps. 1:5: the wicked shall not rise again in judgment, etc. Gal. 2:15: we by nature are Jews, and not sinners of the Gentiles. But according to Augustine, in On Christian Doctrine, sins are distinguished into two, namely spiritual ones, which are called crimes, and carnal ones, and these are called shameful deeds; and therefore he says for the wicked, as to the spiritual. Prov. 17:9: he who hides crimes, etc. As to the carnal he says for the defiled. Mal. 2:11: Judah has profaned the sanctification of the Lord, etc. Then he enumerates the sins in particular. And first he names certain ones in particular; second he gathers the rest in general, at the words and if there be any other. First he sets forth sins of deed; second sins of the mouth, at the words for liars, etc. Concerning the first he sets forth, first, as to crimes; second, as to shameful deeds. Crimes are said to be those which are to the harm of one's neighbor. And the more closely joined the neighbor is, the graver their sin is, because we are more bound to them. And therefore he speaks first of the father, second of the mother. Ex. 20:12: honor your father and your mother, etc., and afterward 21:15: he who strikes his father or mother shall die the death; then he continues concerning other killings of neighbors, saying; Ex. 21:14: if anyone kill his neighbor by design, etc. Then he sets forth the shameful deeds, and first those which are according to nature, when he says for fornicators. Heb., last chapter: fornicators and adulterers God will judge. Second, those against nature, saying for those who lie with males. 1 Cor. 6:10: nor those who lie with males shall possess the kingdom of God. Then he sets forth the harms of the mouth, and first as to simple lying, saying for liars. Eph. 4:25: putting away lying, speak the truth, etc. Second as to swearing, saying for perjurers. And then he gathers the rest in general, saying and if there be any other thing to sound doctrine, etc. Job 6:30: you will not find iniquity in my tongue, nor will folly sound in my mouth, etc. Tit. 2:1: speak the things that become sound doctrine. Then, when he says which is according to the Gospel, he shows that the Gospel imparts sound doctrine, which he describes in three ways. And first from the end, when he says of glory, namely which it announces, Ps. 95:3: declare his glory among the nations. Second from the author of the glory, when he says of the blessed God. Below, at the end: whom in his own time he shall show, who is the blessed and only mighty King of kings, etc. Third from the minister, when he says which was committed to me. Gal. 2:7: when they had seen that the Gospel of the uncircumcision was committed to me, etc. Then, when he says I give thanks, he proves by experience in himself what he himself had been in the time of the law and what he had obtained in the time of grace. And first he shows what was done concerning himself in each time; second he leads Timothy to imitate him, at the words this precept. Concerning the first he does two things: first he shows what was given to him in the law, and what was given to him in the Gospel; second he assigns the reason, at the words a faithful saying. Likewise the first part is divided into three particles, because first he sets forth the dignity which he obtained in the Gospel; second the sins under which he lay in the state of the law, at the words who before was; third how he was freed, at the words but mercy, etc. But for someone to be a minister of the Gospel, three things are required. First, that it be committed to him. Rom. 10:15: how shall they preach, unless they be sent, etc. Second, fitness, that is, that he be faithful. 1 Cor. 4:2: here now it is required among stewards, that a man be found faithful. Likewise, that he be strong to carry it through. And these three he sets forth in reverse order, and first the third, saying who has strengthened me, etc., namely to carry through the office enjoined on him. Ez. 3:14: the hand of the Lord was with me, strengthening me. The second he sets forth at the words because he counted me faithful, etc. Matt. 24:45: a faithful and prudent servant, whom his lord has set over his household. And this because he sought only the things that were God's. The first indeed he shows, when he says in the ministry, that is, committing this ministry to me. Acts 13:2: separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have taken them. 2 Cor. 11:23: are they ministers of Christ? So am I. But what sort of man was he in the state of the law? A sinner. And first against God, when he says who before was a blasphemer, namely of the name of Christ. Lev. 24:14: bring forth the blasphemer outside the camp, and let all who heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the people stone him. Hence that applied to himself. Likewise against his neighbor, when he says and a persecutor. 1 Cor. 15:9: I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God. Likewise and injurious, in words and deeds. Jer. 20:10: I heard the reproaches of many, etc. Then, when he says but the mercy of God, he shows how he was freed through Christ. And concerning this he does two things: first he sets forth the mercy that freed him; second he shows that he was superabundantly filled with good things, at the words but it superabounded. As to the first he says but I obtained the mercy of God. Lam. 3:22: it is of the mercies of the Lord that we are not consumed. Rom. 9:18: he has mercy on whom he will, and whom he will he hardens. But on my part there is some excuse of the sin, because I did it ignorantly. He says less, but signifies more, because it is one thing to act unknowingly, another through ignorance; for he acts unknowingly who does not know what he is doing, yet if he knew, he would still do it, as one who, believing he is killing a wild beast, kills his enemy, whom nevertheless he would have killed even more gladly, had he recognized him. But he acts through ignorance who does something that he would not do, if he knew, as one killing his father, whom, if he knew him, he would not kill, whom nevertheless he kills, because he believes him to be an enemy. But Paul acted through ignorance, because if he had known that Christ was the Son of God, he would not have done this. But the Jews did not kill Christ through ignorance, but unknowingly, because if they had known him to be the Christ, they would have killed him even more gladly. Lk. 12:47: the servant who knew the will of his lord, and did not prepare himself, nor did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes, etc. But as to the second he says it superabounded, etc. Rom. 5:20: where sin abounded, grace also superabounded. With faith and love. For there he produced the effect of faith through love working, which is in Christ Jesus. Gal. 3:14: in Christ Jesus, that we may receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.”

“Above he showed his own condition, both as to sins under the law and as to the goods in the time of grace; here he shows the reason for these benefits, which is taken from divine mercy. And first he sets forth divine mercy in general; second he applies it to himself, at the words "of whom I am the first"; third he sets forth the giving of thanks, at the words "but to the king of ages." Concerning the first he does two things: first he commends the truth about to be proposed; second he sets forth the divine mercy, at the words "because Christ Jesus." As to the first he says, "a faithful saying," etc. Now there are two things to be commended in a saying, namely that it be true and that it be acceptable. For sometimes a true saying is harsh, and stirs up hatred. Gal. 4:16: "I have become your enemy, telling you the truth." But this saying, first indeed, has truth; hence he says, "a faithful saying." Apoc., last chapter: "these words are most faithful and true." Likewise it is acceptable, because it concerns our salvation; therefore he says, "and worthy of all acceptance." Zach. 1:13: "and the Lord answered the angel who was speaking," etc. Another text has: "a human saying," because it concerns the taking up of men. Titus 3:4: "the kindness and love for mankind of our Savior appeared," etc. And this saying is such: "that Christ came," etc. That he came into the world expresses a twofold nature, namely that of divinity, in which he existed before he appeared in the world. John 16:28: "I came forth from the Father, and came into the world," etc. And that of humanity, in which he appeared. And because he is God, he fills heaven and earth, Jer. 23:24; therefore it does not belong to him according to the divine nature to be in any place, but it belongs to him according to the human nature. John 1:10: "he was in the world, and the world," et cetera. "He came unto his own," et cetera. But for what did he come? "To save sinners," that is, for the salvation of the peoples. John 3:17: "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him." John 12:47: "For I did not come to judge the world." But if no one had been a sinner, would he not have been incarnate? It seems not, because he came to save sinners. Therefore the incarnation would not have been necessary. Likewise the Gloss: "take away the disease, and there will be no need of medicine." I answer. It must be said that this is sufficiently clear from the words of the saints. But this question is not of great authority, because God ordained the things to be done according as the things to be done actually were. And we do not know what he would have ordained, if he had not foreseen sin; nevertheless the authorities seem expressly to declare that he would not have been incarnate, if man had not sinned — toward which side I myself incline more. Then when he says "of whom I am the first," he applies this to himself. First confessing himself a sinner; second he says that he was saved, at the words "but I obtained mercy." He says therefore, "of whom I am the first." Here a certain heretic says that the soul of Adam was in Paul, and passed from body to body — as if to say: I am the first sinner, because the soul of Adam is my soul. But this is against the Apostle, Rom. 9:11: "when they were not yet born," etc. Therefore the soul does not exist before the body. He is first, therefore, not in time but in the greatness of his sins. And he says this out of humility. Prov. 18:17: "the just man is first the accuser of himself." Prov. 30:2: "I am the most foolish of men," etc. But was the Apostle really the greatest sinner? And it seems that Judas was greater. But some say that Paul's sin was more general, because it was against the whole Church. But this is nothing, since Paul acted in unbelief, whereas many Jews persecuted out of malice. It must be said, therefore, that he is first, not because he was the greatest among the sinners who then existed, but the greatest among sinners who were saved; as if to say: he came to save sinners, of whom — namely, of the sinners saved — I am the first; which is to be understood of those who preceded the Apostle, since even before him many others had persecuted the Church. And he says this in order to show that everything God does, he does for the showing forth of his own goodness. Prov. 16:4: "the Lord has worked all things for himself." Ecclesiasticus: "his work is full of the glory of the Lord." Likewise for our benefit; and therefore he says, "therefore he saved me." First for his own glory. Hence "first" is expounded as first in time, or as first, that is, most especially. "All patience," that is, perfect patience, because though provoked he did not punish, but rather exalted his adversary, and this for our benefit; hence he says "for an example," that is, for instruction and edification — as if to say: so that sinners might not despair of approaching him. 1 Peter, last chapter: "made a pattern of the flock." Then when he says "to the king," etc., he sets forth the giving of thanks, and concerning this he does two things: first he commends him to whom thanks are given; second he renders thanks, at the word "honor." Now he commends him, first, from his power; second, from the property of his nature. As to the first he says, "to the king." His dominion is the greatest, because he alone rules, and has free power, not according to statutes, as a political ruler does. But God alone is the lord of all. And therefore he says, "to God." Apoc. 19:16: "king of kings and lord of lords." Ps. 46:7: "for God is king of all the earth." Likewise the power of any king, for the most part, lasts no more than fifty years, but this one is of all ages. Ps. 144:13: "your kingdom is of all ages," etc. Ecclesiasticus 10:4: "the power of the earth is in the hand of God." To whom also belongs the property of the nature of God. Concerning this it must be known that among things, the first difference of natural things is the corruptible and the incorruptible. And of incorruptible things, some are visible and corporeal, such as the terrestrial bodies; but some are invisible and spiritual, such as the angels. And these, according to the Platonists, are divided into gods, who are supreme by nature, and into intellects, which are not gods but are divine, and into souls; but among us there is one God alone. Deut. 6:4: "hear, O Israel, the Lord your God." He says therefore, first, "immortal," to distinguish him from corruptible things; "invisible," to show that he belongs to the invisible, and to distinguish him from other visible things. He says "to God alone," and not "alone immortal," or "alone invisible," because he alone is God by nature, although he could be called "alone immortal," and "alone invisible," that is, special above the others. Below, last chapter: "who alone has immortality." Then when he says "honor and glory," he gives thanks; as if to say: honor is to be shown to him from the subjection of the whole creature, and in manifestation of his own most excellent goodness, brightness, and glory. Apoc. 7:12: "blessing, and brightness, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, honor, power and strength to our God." "Forever and ever," because the age of others lasts but a little time. Is. 40:6: "all flesh is grass, and all its glory as the flower of the grass." Then when he says "this commandment," etc., he instructs Timothy to remain in the things that are said. First he recalls what has been entrusted to him; second he admonishes him to the due use of it; and third he teaches the manner of using it. He says therefore, "this commandment" — namely, that you keep the end of the law, that is, that you preserve charity always, and not the fables of the Jews — "I commend to you," as a faithful deposit, because it has been entrusted to you for this reason. And how? "According to the preceding," etc., that is, because this Gospel does not disagree with the prophecies which he had learned before, since he was the son of a Jewish woman. 2 Peter 1:19: "we have a more sure prophetic word, to which you do well to attend, as to a lamp shining in a dark place," etc. 1 Thess., last chapter: "do not despise prophecies," etc. Or "according to the preceding," that is, according to what I and other holy men knew through the spirit of prophecy was to be handed on to you concerning you. "That in them you may war," namely in those prophecies, "the good warfare." Warfare is twofold: one spiritual, one carnal. 2 Cor. 10:4: "the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty to God," etc. In a good warfare two things are required on the part of the soldier: namely, that he do nothing contrary to military discipline, and that he not grow slack through idleness. 1 Cor. 9:25: "everyone who competes in the contest abstains from all things," etc. Likewise on the part of the warfare two things are required: namely, that it fight down those opposed to the commonwealth, and that it subject those who ought to be subject. So too it is in the spiritual warfare, because it is ordered to destroying all who exalt themselves, and to subjecting every understanding to the obedience of Christ, as is said in 2 Cor. 10. And this is the true warfare, of which he says "that you war," etc. Where also, first, the manner of using it is set forth, and second its necessity, at the words "which some." He says therefore, "that you war," etc., as if to say: you can indeed wage the good warfare, first through the good faith which you have. 1 John, last chapter: "this is the victory that overcomes the world, faith," etc. Likewise through a good conscience, because a man easily withdraws from that which bites him; hence the remorse of conscience is like a certain goad, which pricks the one who has a bad conscience, and therefore he quickly withdraws from sins through a good conscience and right faith. Acts 23:1: "I have lived before God in all good conscience until this day." 2 Cor. 1:12: "this is our glory, the testimony of our conscience." The necessity of a good conscience is consequently shown, when he says "which some," etc.; where first he sets forth the fault; second the punishment; third the fruit of the punishment. The fault, at the word "which" — namely, a good conscience — "certain men, thrusting away, have made shipwreck concerning the faith." For he who errs against the faith loses everything that he has. Heb. 11:6: "without faith it is impossible to please God." Likewise he dies, because "my just man lives by faith," Habakkuk 2:4, and Rom. 11:17 — "of whom are Alexander and Hymenaeus." 2 Tim. 4:14: "Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm," etc. Then their punishment is set forth, when he says "whom I have delivered," etc., because he excommunicated them, so that the faithful might avoid them, lest they defile them. Now the excommunication of the Apostle was of such power that those excommunicated were soon seized upon by the Devil, and vexed bodily. 1 Cor. 5:4f.: "you being gathered together, and my spirit, in the power of the Lord Jesus, to deliver such a man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved." Yet even now men are delivered up to be vexed spiritually, because they lose the suffrages of the Church, which help much against the Devil. And "I have delivered" just as God "delivered up to a reprobate sense," Rom. 1:28, as it were withdrawing his help, and the communion of the Church, and its suffrages. And this not out of hatred, but out of charity for their profit. 1 Cor. 5:5: "that the spirit may be saved." Hence he says, "that they may learn," at least through punishment, "not to blaspheme." Now one learns to withdraw from sin in three ways: sometimes, namely, through punishment, when he is vexed bodily; likewise through the confusion of excommunication; likewise from this, that when the Church delivers someone to Satan, he falls into manifest sins, whence, confounded, he is humbled, and abstains even from the hidden sins, which before he did not know himself to have.”

“He above taught Timothy how he might lead the people back to the form of the true faith; here he treats of the things pertaining to the worship of the faith, namely prayers and services. And first he sets down the teaching on prayer in common; second he descends to the determinate conditions of men, at *I desire therefore*. Again, first he distinguishes the different kinds of prayer; second he shows for whom prayer is to be made, at *for all*; third he assigns the reason, at *for this is good*. He says therefore: since it is so that Christ came to save sinners, therefore *first of all I beseech*, etc. In this he openly shows that among all the things necessary for the Christian life, prayer is foremost, which avails against the dangers of temptation and for progressing in good. James, last chapter: *the persevering prayer of a just man avails much*. He therefore distinguishes prayer into four kinds, namely supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings, of which three pertain to obtaining benefits, the last to benefits received. Now in obtaining benefits three things are required. First, that the one obtaining assign the cause why it should be granted to him; second, it is necessary that he show the cause to be reasonable; third, he concludes the petition. And as orators do, so also we ought to do in praying. First, to devise the cause why it should be granted, and this is not our merits but the divine mercy. Dan. 9:18: *we do not lay our prayers before your face on the ground of our own justifications, but on the ground of your many mercies*, etc. And for this there is supplication, which is an attestation through sacred things, as: *through your passion and cross, deliver us, O Lord*. This cause having been devised, it is necessary that we meditate that this sacred thing is the cause of salvation. And therefore prayer is required, which is the ascent of the mind to God. Ps. 68:14: *but as for me, my prayer is to you, O Lord*, etc. Now prayer (*oratio*) is so called as it were the reason (*ratio*) of the mouth (*oris*). For the persuasions of orators are called orations, because they persuade; but it is one way there, and another in our prayer to God, because we do not intend to bend the mind of God, who is always ready for the good, but that our heart be lifted up to God in prayer. Third, petition. James 1:6: *but let him ask in faith, nothing wavering*. Likewise, for gifts received, thanksgivings. 1 Thess., last chapter: *in all things give thanks*. Phil. 4:6: *in every prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your petitions be made known before God*. Hence this manner of praying is in the Church of God: *Almighty, everlasting God* — behold the ascent of the mind, which is prayer; *who have given to the Church such a benefit* — behold the thanksgiving; *grant, we beseech you* — behold the petition; *through our Lord* — behold the supplication. Likewise in the Mass there is supplication up to the consecration of the body and blood, because in these there is a commemoration of the sacred things from which comes the confidence of obtaining. In the mystery of the consecration there is prayer, because it is a meditation on the things which Christ did. But in the other parts, up to communion, there is petition for the living and the dead, and for oneself. And at the end there is thanksgiving. Or these four are referred to four things which we wish to obtain in prayer: supplication is referred to obtaining difficult things, as to the conversion of the impious; prayer, when for those already converted we implore grace that they may progress; petition, that rewards be repaid for merits; and for benefits already received, there is thanksgiving. Then when he says *for all*, he shows for whom prayer is to be made. And concerning this he does two things: first he shows that prayer ought to be made for all; second he assigns the fruit of prayer, at *that we may lead a quiet*. Concerning the first, then, he says that prayer ought to be made for all men. The reason for this is that prayer is the interpreter of our desire; for in praying we ask for what we desire. But charity requires that we desire good for all to whom it extends. James, last chapter, 16: *pray for one another that you may be saved*, etc. But for whom especially? *For kings*, etc. Baruch 1:11: *pray for the life of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and for the life of Balthasar his son*. And the Apostle says, Rom. 13:1: *let every soul be subject to the higher powers*. 1 Pet. 2:13: *be subject to every human creature for God's sake, whether to the king as excelling, or to leaders as sent by him*. For those who are subject must render to their lords from their own offices. Now the usefulness is this, that through this we also procure our own good; for in their peace is our peace. Hence he says *that we may lead a quiet and tranquil*, etc. In these two is the peace of the world. For the Church has a peace of her own, in which the world has no part, because there is no peace for the impious. But there is a certain peace common to both, and this the Church needs. Jer. 29:7: *seek the peace of the city to which I have caused you to be led away*. Earthly peace is sometimes disturbed from within, sometimes from without. 2 Cor. 7:5: *without were fightings, within were fears*. As to the first he says *that we may lead a quiet*; as to the second he says *and tranquil life*. And although earthly peace is common to the good and the wicked, yet each use it in a different way. For the wicked used it then for two things: namely for the worship of demons, because they attributed that prosperity to false gods; also for wantonness, because in time of peace carnal vices abounded. Wis. 14:22: *living in a great war of ignorance, they call so many and so great evils peace*. But the saints, on the contrary, use it in the worship of the true God and in chastity. And therefore he says *in all piety and chastity*. Titus 2:12: *let us live soberly, and justly, and piously in this world*. Then when he says *for this is good*, the reason for prayer is given. And concerning this he does two things: first he sets down the reasons; second he proves a certain proposition, at *for there is one God*. Again, first he assigns the reason from the species of the work; second from the part of God, at *and acceptable*. He therefore gives the reason from the species of the work, because when something is good in itself, we ought to do it; but to pray for others is of this kind, because it is an act of charity. And therefore he says *for this is good*. Ps. 51:9: *because it is good in the sight of your saints*. Likewise from the part of God, because it is also *acceptable before God*. Ps. 50:20: *then you will accept the sacrifice*, etc. And this only if it has been offered in charity. And he says *Savior*, because God alone saves. Is. 43:11: *there is no savior besides me*. And he proves that it is acceptable, at *who wills*, etc. 2 Pet. 3:9: *not willing that any should perish, but that all should return to repentance*. But against this: whatever he willed, he did; therefore he saves all. But if you say that he does not, because man does not will it, it seems unfitting that the omnipotent should be impeded by the will of one who is not omnipotent. I respond. To will is taken sometimes for the will of good pleasure, sometimes for the will of sign. For the will of sign, he wills to save all, because he has set before all the precepts, counsels, and remedies of salvation. For the will of good pleasure, it can be explained in four ways. In one way, that it is a causal manner of speaking, as God is said to do something because he makes others do it — as Rom. 8:26: *the Spirit asks*, that is, he makes us ask. Thus therefore God wills, because namely he makes his saints will that all be saved. For this willing ought to be in the saints, because they do not know who are predestined and who are not. In another way, that it is a fitting distribution — that is, all who will be saved — because no one is saved except by his will, just as in one school a master teaches all the boys of this city, because none is taught except by him. In another way, that it is a distribution for the genera of individuals, not for the individuals of the genera — that is, he excepts no genus of men from salvation, because formerly it was offered only to the Jews, but now it is offered to all. And this fits more with the intention of the Apostle. But in another way, according to Damascene, that it be understood of the antecedent will, not the consequent. For although in the will of God there is no before and after, yet it is called antecedent and consequent will. Likewise according to the order of the things willed, according as the will can be considered in two ways, namely universally or absolutely, and according to certain circumstances and in particular. And the absolute consideration, and in universal, is prior to the particular and compared consideration. And therefore the absolute will is, as it were, antecedent, and the will of some thing in particular is, as it were, consequent. An example concerning a merchant who wills to save all his goods absolutely, and this by antecedent will; but if he considers safety, he does not will to save all his goods by comparison with other things, namely when along with their safety the sinking of the ship would follow. And this will is consequent. Thus in God, the salvation of all men, considered in itself, has the character of being willable, and the Apostle here speaks in this way, and so his will is antecedent. But if the good of justice is considered, and that sins be punished, thus he does not will it. And this is the consequent will. And he adds *to the knowledge of the truth*, because there is no salvation except through the knowledge of the truth. John 8:32: *you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free*. Then when he says *one*, etc., he proves by reason what he had said, and there are three proofs: one from the part of God, another from the part of the man Christ, a third from the part of the witnesses of Christ. He says therefore that God wills all, etc. This is clear, because there is one God of all, who saves. Rom. 3:29: *is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also, since indeed there is one God*, etc. Then the reason from the part of the man Christ is given, at *one and mediator*, etc. Where first he proves his point, second he adduces a sign, at *who gave*. He says therefore: the man Christ Jesus is mediator of God and men — not of certain ones, but between God and all men — and this would not have been so unless he willed to save all. And it can be said that Christ as mediator is similar to each extreme, namely to God and to man, insofar as he is God and insofar as he is man, because a middle term ought to have something of each of the extremes; and these are man and God. But because a middle term is distinct from each of the extremes, and the Son is not another God than the Father, therefore it is better to say that he is mediator according as he is man. For thus he shares with each of the extremes. For in God there are two things, namely justice and immortality; but in men there is injustice and mortality. There are therefore two middle terms: one in which there is justice and mortality, another in which there is immortality and injustice. And each is a middle term, but the first middle term belongs to Christ, the second to the Devil. And therefore the Devil is a disjoining middle term, because through his injustice he disjoins us from divine justice; but Christ is a conjoining middle term, because he is just and mortal, and through his death joins us to the justice of God. 1 John 2:2: *he is the propitiation for our sins* — for some efficaciously, but for all sufficiently, because the price of his blood is sufficient for the salvation of all; but it does not have efficacy except in the elect, on account of an impediment.”

“Above he said that God wills all to be saved, and he proved this on the part of God, who is one of all, and on the part of Christ, who is one mediator of all; here he proves the same thing on the part of testimony. And first he brings forward other witnesses; second, his own testimony, at the words "in which I am placed." He says therefore: "he gave himself for all." But did it perhaps suddenly come into God's mind, that he who had chosen to save the Jews only should will to save the whole world? Excluding this he says, "the testimony of which was in its own times"; as if to say: this law is not sudden, but attested of old through the Law and through the Prophets. Isaiah 44:8: "You are my witnesses." Acts 10:43: "To this all the prophets bear witness," etc. "It was confirmed," namely by the fulfillment and showing of signs, and by the preaching of the apostles. "In its own times," namely in which it had been predetermined to come to pass. Ecclesiastes 3:1: "All things have their time." Or: the testimony of the apostles was confirmed at determined times. Acts 1:8: "You shall be witnesses to me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and Samaria, and even to the end of the earth," etc. Then, when he says "in which I am placed," he sets forth his own testimony. And first he shows his office; second, the use of his office, at the word "truth." He says therefore, "in which," namely in the office of bearing witness, "I am placed," namely by God. John 15:16: "I have placed you that you may go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit may remain." "I a preacher," because he placed me for this, that I should preach. Mark, last chapter: "Going into the whole world, preach the Gospel to every creature." But in any craft there are two kinds: some working in a ministerial way, and some who arrange concerning others, namely the master-builders; but in the office of the Church, those who arrange are the apostles; and therefore he says "apostle," as it were with authority. 1 Corinthians 9:2: "You are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord." Now the use of the office is to preach the truth, and this is the office of preachers, that they speak the truth. Proverbs 8:7: "My throat shall meditate truth." Ephesians 4:25: "Speak the truth." But there is no teaching which does not have some truth; but a teaching is condemned in this, that it mixes falsity with truth. And therefore he says, "I speak the truth, I do not lie." Proverbs 8:8: "All my words are right." Job 6:30: "You shall not find iniquity in my tongue." And this is the use of the office, namely to preach the truth without lying, which pertains to my office, who am "teacher of the Gentiles." Now a teacher generates knowledge in the soul of the disciple. But knowledge is not of the false; hence one who teaches what is false is not a teacher. But on the contrary, Matthew 23:8: "Do not be called Rabbi." I answer: he does not forbid the ministry of teaching, but the ambition of office. Acts 9:15: "This man is a vessel of election to me, to carry my name," etc. Isaiah 49:6: "I have given you as a light of the Gentiles," etc. And I ought to teach them "in faith and truth," because he ought to teach faith and good morals. And he says "in faith," that is, concerning those things which pertain to the present state, in which we live according to faith, and "in truth" as regards the state of glory. Then, when he says "I will," he descends to the particular ranks of men. And concerning this he does two things: first he admonishes men about prayer, second, women, at the words "likewise also women." He says therefore, "I will," etc. He requires three things from men in praying: first, that prayer be assiduous; second, pure; third, quiet. Assiduous, as at every time and in every place. And he says "I will," because it is good that a man should pray, and I the teacher will that men pray "in every place," not in Jerusalem only, as the Jews, nor on Mount Gerizim, as the Samaritans, John 4:21. In every place a man can pray spiritually and mentally. Zephaniah 2:11: "Men shall worship him from his own place, all the islands of the Gentiles," etc. But how does the Lord reprove the Pharisees standing at the corners, Matthew 6:5? I answer: mental prayer can be done anywhere, but outward signs of prayer ought not to be made in every place, because a man ought not to appear singular in outward things, since on account of this vain glory could be had. But why then are churches made? I answer: not that a place is of necessity to prayer, but for its well-being; because prayer requires solitude and quiet. Likewise pure. Therefore he says "lifting up pure hands." Augustine: what we do outwardly in praying, we do so that our affection may be stirred up inwardly. For genuflections and things of this kind are not in themselves acceptable to God, but because through these, as through signs of humility, a man is inwardly humbled, just as the raising of the hands signifies the raising of the heart. Lamentations 3:41: "Let us lift up our hearts with our hands to the Lord in heaven." "Lifting up," etc., that is, praying with devotion of heart. Job 8:5f: "If you rise at dawn to God, and entreat the Almighty, if you walk clean and upright, at once he will awaken to you, and will render the dwelling of your righteousness peaceful." Likewise quiet. Therefore he says "without anger and disputation." And he sets down two things. First, namely, that the mind be without anger, which disquiets the soul toward inflicting harm on one's neighbor, from which the soul of the one praying must be free. Sirach 28:3: "Man keeps anger against man, and seeks healing from God." Likewise a man ought to be free from disputation, which can be understood in two ways. In one way, according to the Gloss, that we should not dispute against God, being incredulous of his words, and murmuring against his ordinance. Romans 9:20: "O man, who are you that you should answer back to God," etc. Likewise against one's neighbor, that we should not break peace with him, which is done through disputation. For peace is necessary to one who prays. Matthew 18:19: "If two of you shall agree on earth, concerning any matter which they shall ask, it shall be done for them by my Father." Then, when he says "likewise also women," he sets women in order, and first as to prayer, second as to teaching, at the words "let women in silence." Likewise, first he shows what is required of a woman praying; second he explains what he had said, at the words "not in braided." Concerning the first it must be known that all things which are required for a man praying are required also for women. And therefore he says "likewise also women," as if to say: let them keep all the things that have been said. But he adds two things, namely adornment and modesty, saying "in adorned attire with modesty," the reason for which is, that it is natural that, just as women are of softer body than men, so also of weaker reason. Now it belongs to reason to order the acts and the effects of each thing. But adornment consists in due order and disposition. Thus in inward comeliness, unless all things be ordered by disposition through reason, they do not have spiritual beauty. And therefore, because women fall short in reason, he requires adornment from them. Likewise modesty concerns a shameful act, and therefore it is praiseworthy in those who are accustomed to fall easily into shameful acts, of which sort are the young and women, and therefore this is praised in them, but not in the old and the perfect. Sirach 26:19: "Grace upon grace is a holy and modest woman." Likewise he requires sobriety; hence there follows "and with sobriety." For because in women reason is weak, and sobriety preserves the power of reason, therefore drunkenness is most especially reproved in women. Hence of old among the Romans wine was not given to them. "Not with braided hair, and gold," etc. He explains what he had said, and first concerning adornment, second concerning modesty, at the words "but what becomes." Concerning the first, first he excludes bodily adornment; second he sets down spiritual adornment, at the words "but what becomes." Concerning the first he says: what I said about adorned attire, I do not mean of the exterior, because "not with braided hair," that is, not with the head or the whole body adorned. But women adorn the head especially, which is natural to woman, as is said 1 Corinthians 11:15. And therefore they have adornments on the head. But on the head there is a twofold covering. One is natural, namely the hair, as is said 1 Corinthians 11:5; the other artificial, and in both they adorn themselves, because they braid their hair. Hence he says "not with braided," that is, curled. Isaiah 3:24: "Instead of curled hair there shall be baldness." Likewise he forbids artificial things, when he says "or with gold, or pearls." 1 Peter 3:3: "Not the outward braiding of hair, or the wearing of gold, or of apparel, or the adornment of garments," etc. Or: "not with braided hair, and gold," that is, not having hair braided with gold, or pearls. But as to the whole body he says "or with costly garment"; for this the apostle condemns here, and Isaiah 3:17. But is this indeed a sin? I answer: it must be said that according to Augustine two things are to be considered in the adornment of women, namely simple adornment and painted adornment. Simple adornment, as in garment, and in gold, and things of this kind, can be done with sin in three ways: namely from a depraved intention, as if they intend the stirring of concupiscence, ostentation, or vain glory. Proverbs 7:10: "Prepared to capture souls." Second, if it be done contrary to the custom of one's homeland, which is done in various ways. For what exceeds the accustomed measure of one's homeland comes from lightness of mind. Third, if it exceeds the condition of one's own state. But if right intention, the custom of one's homeland, and the condition of one's state are preserved, it is not a sin. But concerning the painted kind, it is always a sin. For women are not permitted to be adorned except for the sake of men, and men do not wish to be deceived, so that painted women should appear to them. Let there be, therefore, not such adornment, but such as becomes women "professing godliness." For the exterior works of man are as it were a certain profession of the interior man, just as religious have their habit for this, and clerics likewise. Hence unless the interior agrees with the exterior, it is a pretense. So too concerning other interior works. For inwardly we ought to cultivate godliness, that is, to have the worship of God, but outwardly to promise and to render it through good works, which agree with godliness; and likewise to have inwardly, just as we show outwardly. Or, I say, that they ought to adorn themselves not outwardly, but according to what becomes them "professing," that is, what they ought to profess, godliness through good works. Sirach 19:27: "The attire of the body, and the laughter of the teeth, and the walk of a man declare concerning him."”

“For the Apostle above gave directions to women with regard to prayer; here he directs them with regard to teaching. And first he sets down his ordinance concerning their teaching; second he assigns the reason for the ordinance, at the words *For Adam was first*; third he answers a tacit question, at the words *yet she shall be saved*. Again, first he shows what is fitting for women; second, what does not belong to them, at the words *but to teach*. Concerning the first, he sets down three things as belonging to them, namely silence, being taught, and subjection; these three proceed from one reason, namely from a defect of reason in them. To these he first enjoins silence, saying *let a woman learn in silence*, etc. James 3:2: *If anyone offends not in word, he is a perfect man*; and 1 Cor. 14:34: *let women keep silence in the churches, for it is not permitted them to speak*, etc. For a woman's words are inflaming. Ecclesiasticus 9:11: *her talk burns as it were with fire*. Second, that they should learn, because it is proper to those who are deficient in reason to be learning. 1 Cor. 14:35: *but if they wish to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home*, etc. But to men it is given that they should teach. Third, he enjoins subjection, because it is natural that the soul should rule the body, and reason the lower powers. And therefore, as the Philosopher teaches, whenever two things are related to one another as the soul to the body, and reason to sensuality, the natural dominion belongs to that one which abounds in reason, and that one rules, while the other is subject, namely the one that is deficient in reason. Gen. 2: *you shall be under the power of your husband*. Again, he excludes those things which do not belong to them, saying *but to teach*, etc. And there are two things, namely, that they not teach. But against this, Proverbs, last chapter: *his mother taught him*, etc. I answer. It must be said that teaching is of one kind public, and this does not belong to a woman, and therefore he says *in the Church*; of another kind private, and by this a mother instructs her son. But against this, Judges 5: Deborah instructed the people of Israel. I answer. That instruction was through the spirit of prophecy, and the grace of the Holy Spirit does not distinguish between man and woman; yet she did not preach publicly, but by the instinct of the Holy Spirit gave counsel. Second, dominion over a man is forbidden to them. Ecclesiasticus 25:30: *if a woman has the primacy, she is contrary to her husband*. And the Philosopher says that the rule of women is the corruption of a household, as of tyrants in a kingdom. And thus he forbids two things against the two that belong to them, but he repeats the first, namely *but to be in silence*. Then, when he says *For Adam*, he assigns the reason for what he had said, and first from the order of creation; second from the order of guilt, at the words *and Adam was not seduced*. Concerning the first, it must be known that in the order of things the perfect and the imperfect are ordered in different ways: for in one and the same thing the imperfect precedes in time, and the perfect precedes in nature, because nature tends toward the perfect; but in different things the perfect is prior both in time and in nature, because nature always begins from what is perfect. And this order is at work here, because man is perfect in human nature, woman is a defective male. Hence Adam was formed first. Gen. 2:7: *God formed man from the slime of the earth*; secondarily woman, as a certain imperfect thing originated from the perfect, namely from a rib. 1 Cor. 11:8: *for man is not from woman, but woman is from man*. And hence it is that man is not said to have been made for the sake of woman, but to the likeness of God. Gen. 1:26: *let us make man to our image and likeness*. But woman was made for the sake of man; therefore man ought to preside. Likewise on the part of guilt. For the order of generation and of corruption is contrary, because what is first in generation is last in corruption. But sin is a corruption of nature, and therefore generation begins first from Adam, but corruption from the woman. Hence he says *Adam was not seduced*, namely first, because he was stronger, but the tempter began from the weaker, so that the stronger might more easily be seduced. Here he alludes to the words of Adam, Gen. 3:12. For when the Lord reproved Adam, he said: *the woman whom you gave me as a companion, she gave to me*, etc. And therefore he says *Adam was not seduced, but the woman*. But seduction is twofold: namely in the universal, and in the particular object of choice, which is ignorance of choice. Whoever therefore sins is seduced by ignorance of choice in the particular object of choice. But the woman was seduced by ignorance in the universal, namely when she believed what the serpent said; but the man did not believe this, but was deceived in the particular, namely that he ought to indulge his wife's wish, and that he ought to eat with her, and, being unpracticed in the divine severity, he believed that it would easily be forgiven him. But against this: ignorance is the punishment of sin, therefore punishment preceded guilt. I answer. It must be said that it did not precede, because immediately at the words of the serpent she was elated, because someone else was concerned for her, and from that elation she was seduced; hence elation preceded. Then, when he says *yet she shall be saved*, he answers a certain tacit question; for someone might say that if woman is not for the sake of man, and from her is the beginning of sin, then she is harmful to man; but if something is not for the sake of another, but is harmful to it, it ought to be removed; therefore woman ought not to be saved. It must therefore be said that salvation is twofold: namely temporal, and this is common even to brute animals; the other is eternal, and this is proper to human beings. Isaiah 51:8: *but my salvation shall be forever*. But woman has not lost either salvation. Not the temporal, for she is not thereby deprived of the female sex on account of the generation of offspring. Nor the eternal, because according to the soul she is capable of grace and glory. And therefore, as to the first, it is said *she shall be saved*, that is, she shall not be uprooted, and this through the bearing of children, to which she is ordained by God. As to the second, he says *if she continues*. But because *if* implies a cause, is it then the case that she who has not continued will not be saved, since the Apostle says that a woman does better if she does not marry? I answer. In one way the expression can be figurative, and thus by *man* the higher reason is understood, the lower reason is the woman, good works are the children of the lower reason, and the charity which she conceives through the man, and by these she shall be saved. The other is a literal exposition, such that the word *through* does not signify a cause, but an opposition. And the sense is: the woman shall be saved, even if she proceeds by way of childbearing, that is, if she marries and is not a virgin. And then the word *through* denotes an increase of salvation, as though through the bearing of children for the worship of God she shall be saved the more. Ecclesiasticus 7:25: *have you children? Instruct them, and bow them down from their childhood*. As to attaining eternal salvation, he sets down three things. First, something with regard to the intellect; second, with regard to the affections; third, with regard to the exterior act. In the intellect is faith, through which the intellect is subjected to Christ; hence he says *in faith*. Heb. 11:6: *without faith it is impossible to please God*. And because faith is worth nothing without love, therefore as to the affections he immediately adds, saying *and love*. 1 Cor. 13:2: *if I have all faith, so that I could move mountains, but have not charity, I am nothing*, etc. But as to the exterior, he sets down two things against wantonness, which consists in two things, namely in lust; and as to this he says *in sanctification*, that is, in chastity. 1 Thess. 4:3: *this is the will of God, your sanctification*, etc. Likewise in drunkenness, against which he says *with sobriety*. Titus 2:12: *that we should live soberly, and godly, and justly in this world*.”

“Above he instructed Timothy concerning the things pertaining to right faith and the worship of God; here he treats of the instruction of ecclesiastical offices. And first the institution itself is set down; second, the occasion or necessity of this institution, at these things I write to you. Again, first he instructs concerning the things pertaining to the bishop; second, as to the deacons, at deacons likewise. But since, according to Dionysius, there are three orders, namely of bishops, who preside; of priests, who illumine; of deacons, who purify: why does he make no mention of priests? I respond. It must be said that priests are understood together with bishops: not that there is no distinction between the orders as to the reality, but as to the names; for presbyter is the same as elder, and episcopus the same as one who oversees. And therefore, as regards the name, both priests and bishops were called bishops and priests alike. Concerning this, therefore, he first treats of the desire of attaining to the episcopate; second, he describes the condition of the bishop, at but it behooves. He therefore prefaces the assertion of his institution, saying a faithful saying, namely which I shall say, or have said. Apoc., last chapter: these words are most faithful and true. If anyone desires the episcopate, etc. From this some have taken an occasion for ambition of the episcopate and of prelacy, but they do not rightly understand what is said here. For the Apostle here wished to show what pertains to a bishop. Episcopus is a Greek word, for scopos means the same as one who attends, and epi, that is, upon; therefore episcopus is said as it were one who oversees. Two things, therefore, are to be considered in a bishop, namely a higher rank, and an action useful to the people. For some perhaps cast their eye upon the things that surround it, namely that he who presides is honored, and that he has power. And whoever desires the episcopate on account of these things does not know what a bishop is. And therefore the Apostle says what a bishop is, and what he desires who desires the episcopate, because a good work. He does not say he has a good desire, but a good work, namely the benefit of the people. But is it lawful to desire it? Augustine says no. The Gloss: a higher position, without which the people cannot be ruled, even if it be held and administered fittingly, is nevertheless unfittingly sought after. And he says the same in Book XIX of the City of God. The reason for this is that no one ought to seek something above his powers, not proportioned to himself, otherwise he would be foolish. Horace: he who does not know how to play abstains from arms in the field. He, therefore, could rightly desire the episcopate, whose capacity was proportioned to the episcopate. But no one is suited to this, because a prelate, according to his rank and fitness, ought to exceed all others in conduct and contemplation, so that in comparison to him the others are a flock. And to presume this fitness of oneself belongs to the greatest pride. Therefore either he seeks the surrounding circumstances, and then he does not know what he seeks, because this is not the episcopate; or he seeks the work itself, and this belongs to pride. And therefore it is not to be accepted unless it is imposed. The Gloss: if you say: the state of bishops is more perfect than the state of religious, and this latter one may lawfully desire, therefore. I respond. Perfection stands differently in the one and in the other, because the state of bishops presupposes perfection, and therefore no one ought to desire it unless he has it; but the state of religious is a way, and therefore perfection already possessed is not required, but that one be bound to acquire it if he does not have it. And this is clear in John, last chapter, where the Lord does not say to Simon: if you wish to be perfect, feed, etc., but to the young man he says: if you wish to be perfect, etc. Thus, therefore, in the name of the episcopate a good work is to be understood. 1 Peter 5:3: not as lording it over the clergy, but being made a pattern of the flock, etc. As if he were to say: if you desire the episcopate, this is what you desire, because it is a good work. But what sort of man a bishop ought to be, he shows when he adds it behooves a bishop, etc., which he first instructs in general; second in particular, at of one wife. He says therefore: I say that he desires a good work, but not everyone is fit for this, but it is necessary that he be such: first, irreproachable. Hence it is said of Zechariah, Luke 1:6, that he walked in all the commandments and justifications without complaint. Leviticus 21:17: he who has a blemish shall not offer bread to his God, nor shall he approach his ministry. Nor is it to be understood that he is altogether without sin, for it is said, 1 John 1:8: if we shall say, etc. Nor is it to be said, as some have said, that whoever has sinned mortally after Baptism is not fit, because there would be few such men; but irreproachable, that is, not subject to any sin for which he could be reproached by others, because it is unbecoming if the reprover should himself be reprovable. Matthew 7:5: cast out first the beam, etc. Then when he says of one wife, etc., he instructs him in particular, and first as to himself, second as to the multitude, at having children. Again the first is divided into two, because first he shows with what virtues he should be adorned; second, from what his mind ought to be free, at not given to wine. But every moral virtue is first concerned with the passions; and there are two things that make for holiness, namely chastity and sobriety, because through delight or the delightful things of the flesh, the soul is most disturbed. And therefore he first sets down what pertains to chastity, saying husband of one wife. Similarly Titus 1:6. But in this there seems to be a discord between Augustine and Jerome. For Jerome says that this is understood as after Baptism, because if before Baptism he had two wives, or one first and another afterward, he is not impeded from ordination, because through Baptism all things are blotted out. Augustine and Ambrose say the contrary, because whether before or after, if he had two, he is not ordained. And does Baptism blot out all things? I respond: yes as to sins, but not as to irregularity, which is sometimes incurred even without sin, from the ecclesiastical institution alone; but marriage is not a sin even among Pagans. But what is the cause of this institution? Is not he who has many concubines impeded even more? I respond. It must be said that this is done not only on account of incontinence, but on account of the representation of the sacrament, because the bridegroom of the Church is Christ, and the Church is one. Song of Songs 5: my dove is one. Second, he treats of sobriety, saying sober. Titus 2:12: let us live soberly and piously and justly in this age, etc. For here he teaches the bishop, who is called an overseer, that he should watch. Luke 1:8: but there were shepherds, etc. And drunkenness hinders watchfulness. 1 Peter, last chapter: be sober, etc. Third, he orders the reason, saying prudent, because this is the directive power of all the virtues, and a bishop is chosen to rule others. Matthew 10:16: be prudent. Matthew 24:45: who, do you think, is the faithful and prudent servant, etc. Consequently he sets down the virtues which order external actions. First as to himself, second as to others. As to himself he says orderly, modest. He is orderly when he composes himself well in acts and words. For orderliness implies a beauty which consists in proportion. Hence he is then orderly when he acts and speaks as befits. Ecclesiasticus 44:6: men rich in virtue, having a zeal for beauty. This is required in a bishop, because through external things we judge of internal things. Ecclesiasticus 19:27: the attire of the body, and the laughter of the teeth, and the gait of a man declare of him. Because a prelate is set in the sight of men, it is necessary that he be orderly. Hence it is said of Ambrose, that he was unwilling to ordain certain men, because they walked in a dissolute manner. Likewise, sometimes it happens that certain base things occur to someone, in others either doing or saying them, and toward these he ought to have modesty, so that he is ashamed if he sees or hears them. Augustine: an immodest eye is the messenger of an immodest heart. Ecclesiasticus 7:21: for the grace of his modesty is above gold. Then when he says hospitable, etc., he treats of the bishop in comparison to others. But it is enjoined upon the bishop that he feed the sheep. John, last chapter, and 1 Peter, last chapter. And almsgiving is twofold, namely corporal and spiritual. Therefore he ought to feed in both. As to the first he says hospitable, namely of strangers and guests. Romans 12:3: pursuing hospitality. Hebrews, last chapter: do not forget hospitality, etc. Job 31:32: my door was open to the traveler, etc. As to the second he says teacher. Ephesians 4:11: others pastors and teachers, etc. And this is the proper office of a prelate. Jeremiah 3:15: I will give you shepherds according to my heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine, etc. Consequently, when he says not given to wine, etc., he removes the opposite vices. But he removes three: one which pertains to the concupiscence of the flesh, another to anger, another to covetousness. As to the first he says not given to wine. He says less, and signifies more. Ephesians 5:18: be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess. As if he were to say: not gluttonous, not given to excess. As to anger he sets down two things; first as to the act he says not a striker. Fittingly he forbids this after wine, because the drunk strike easily. But moderate, that is, patient. Philippians 4:5: let your moderation be known to all men. Psalm 91:15: they shall be well patient, that they may declare. Christ, having suffered, did not strike back. Second as to words, when he says not litigious. 2 Timothy 2:24: the servant of God ought not to quarrel. 1 Corinthians 11:16: but if anyone seems to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor does the Church of God. And this because bishops are the successors of the apostles, whom Christ instructed to announce peace. Likewise in his passion Christ said: my peace I give to you, my peace I leave with you. As to temporal things he says not covetous, because he is set as judge and ordainer of the Church, who, if he is covetous, easily declines from justice. Exodus 23:8: do not accept gifts, which blind even the prudent and pervert the words of the just. But alas. Jeremiah 6:13: from the greatest even to the least, all are devoted to avarice.”

“Above the Apostle showed what sort of person a bishop ought to be in himself; here he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to the multitude. And first with respect to the multitude of his household family; second with respect to the multitude of the Church, at *not a neophyte*; third with respect to the multitude of unbelievers, at *but it is necessary*. Again, first he shows what sort he ought to be in relation to his household family; second he assigns the reason for this, at *but if anyone*. Again, first he shows that due governance of the family is required of a bishop; second, the good instruction of his children, at *having children*. He says therefore: a bishop must preside well over his household, that is, his family, so that he governs it well. But good governance is not only the acquisition of riches, since these are not the end of household management but instruments; rather its end is right living. Ecclesiasticus 44:6: *making peace in their houses*. But especially in the household family the children are foremost. And therefore he says of them specifically, *having his children in subjection*, that is, that he should rule over his children without being softened by the tenderness of love, which sometimes he extends toward his children. Now among the other things which are required in the children of bishops — the children they had before they were bishops — it is required that they be chaste. Therefore it is added, *with all chastity*, because their evil life would be a testimony against their parent and prelate. Ecclesiasticus 10:2: *as the judge of the people is himself, so also his ministers; and as is the ruler of a city, such also are those dwelling in it*. Wisdom 4:6: *for all the children who are born of unlawful unions are witnesses of wickedness against their parents in their examination*. The second reason is that the people gather at the bishop's house, and therefore it is necessary that they be chaste. Against this stands 1 Kings 2:22, where the sons of Heli, not chaste, corrupted the women coming to the temple. Hence Heli too was punished by the Lord. Then when he says *but if anyone*, he assigns the reason for what he has said. For someone could say: what does it matter to a bishop that he govern his family well, since the common care presses upon him? And therefore he says, *but if anyone* [know not how to rule] *his own house*, etc., namely his own family. Luke 16:10: *he who is faithful in the least is faithful also in the greater*. Yet it happens frequently that some are not good at ruling in small household matters who nevertheless rule well in greater ones. But what he says, *know not*, this not-knowing refers to negligence. For he who neglects small things easily neglects great ones, although one who does not care about small things sometimes conducts himself well in greater ones. Consequently he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of the Church, in which he ought not to be a novice in the faith, but of long standing. Hence he says *not a neophyte*, that is, one having a new faith. Acts 1:21: *it is necessary to choose one of those who [have been] with us, et cetera*. Again, Numbers 11:16: *gather to me seventy men of the elders, whom you know to be elders of the people and masters and leaders, et cetera*. But, as it is said in Wisdom 4:8, *venerable old age is not that of long duration, nor counted by the number of years*. For it happens sometimes that grace abounds in some newcomers, and they have, together with youthful age, an old age of character — men who are advanced by dispensation, as Ambrose was by divine inspiration. Hence what he says here pertains to those who are neophytes not only in age, but who are also neophytes in perfection. And the reason for this is *lest into pride, et cetera*. For when someone newly coming to the faith is also advanced to some position, he reckons himself better than others and greatly necessary, as if, unless he existed, they would have no means by which the Church could be provided for. And he says *of the devil*, because the devil himself was condemned on account of the sin of pride. Then when he says *but it is necessary that he*, etc., he shows how he should conduct himself toward the multitude of unbelievers, and he sets down the proofs. First, that he be of good reputation. Colossians 4:5: *walk in wisdom toward those who are outside*. 1 Peter 2:12: *having your conduct good among the gentiles*. And this is necessary for a prelate, because the conduct of the whole congregation is judged by the prelate. But on the contrary, 2 Corinthians 6:8: *through infamy and good report*. I respond: infamy arises sometimes from the fault of the one who is defamed, and this he forbids here; sometimes from the malice of those who detract, and in this case one must have patience, and it is of this that the Apostle speaks there. But here he speaks of one to be taken up as bishop, who, even if he is good and is falsely defamed, ought to bear it patiently. Second he assigns the reason; hence he adds, *that he fall not into reproach, et cetera*. Here he touches on a twofold danger: namely lest he become an object of reproach, and by this his authority be diminished, and consequently the boldness of correcting be taken away. Matthew 7:5: *cast out first the beam, et cetera*. Second, lest he fall into the snare of the devil, namely sometimes by bearing it impatiently, through which the defamed man is stirred up to hatreds, and despairs, and the like. And that a prelate be hateful to the laity happens if he neglects the worship of divine praise. Malachi 2:8f: *you have made void the covenant of Levi, says the Lord of hosts, wherefore I have given you contemptible and low before all the people*. Then when he says *deacons*, etc., he shows the things pertaining to deacons, which in Greek is the same as ministers. For in the primitive Church there were only three orders, as Dionysius says, namely of bishops, of presbyters, and of ministers; and they were not divided into different grades, but all were in one order, on account of the scarcity of ministers and on account of the newness of the Church. First therefore he shows what sort they ought to be in themselves; second, with respect to others, at *women*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be; second, how they are to be examined, at *and let these*. Again, first he shows what sort they ought to be with respect to their own body; second, with respect to external things, at *not [given to] filthy [lucre]*; third, with respect to other things, at *holding*, et cetera. Again with respect to the body, first he shows the qualities as to the whole body; second, as to the restraint of the mouth. He says therefore: I say that bishops ought to be chaste, and likewise deacons must be, because the contrary of chastity makes one unfit for spiritual things, since it draws the mind away from spiritual things, which such men must needs have raised up. Isaiah 52:11: *be clean, you who carry the vessels of the Lord*. Luke 12:35: *let your loins be girded*. Then he shows what sort they ought to be as to the mouth. The mouth serves speech and taste. As to the first he says, *not double-tongued*. Ecclesiasticus 28:16: *a third tongue has stirred up many, and scattered them from nation to nation*. The double-tongued is one having two tongues. Such deacons will not be ministers of peace. As to the second he says, *not much [wine]*. Proverbs 23:29f: *who has woe? whose father has woe? who has quarrels? who has pits? who has wounds without cause? who has the digging under of the eyes? Is it not those who linger over wine and study to drink up cups?* Isaiah 5:22: *woe to you who are mighty to drink wine, and men strong to mix drunkenness*. Then when he says *not pursuing base gain*, he shows how they should conduct themselves toward external things. For not only are they sometimes turned aside from justice on account of desire for gain, but also from truth, saying things that ought not to be said. And therefore temporal gain is forbidden them, by which is understood every dishonest gain. But as to their disposition he says, *holding*, etc., and he instructs them, first as to faith, second as to purity of conscience. Hence he says *the mystery of the faith*, not *the faith*, that is, not merely simple faith, but the understanding of that which is hidden in the faith. For mystery is the same as hidden, because ministers ought to know not only those things about the faith which the people also understand, but also the mysteries, because they must instruct others. 1 Peter 3:15: *ready always to give satisfaction to everyone who asks you a reason concerning that faith and hope which is in you, et cetera*. Likewise a pure conscience, because an impure one causes one to err in the faith. Above 1:5: *but the end of the commandment is charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and an unfeigned faith*. Then when he says *and let these first be proved, and so*, etc., he shows how they are to be examined. For someone could say: I suppose all are good. For this ought to be so in your estimation, but as to their promotion, all must be examined. Hence they themselves too are examined; hence he says, *and these*, et cetera. *No crime*, that is, mortal sin; but he does not mean venial sin, because, as it is said in 1 John 1:8, *if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us*. Nor does he say, *who have had*, but *having*, that is, who are notable and have the crime of infamy upon them. Otherwise this would be to derogate from the keys of the Church. Then when he says *women*, etc., he shows how they should conduct themselves toward others. And first he sets down his instruction; second the reason, at *for he who [serves] well*. Concerning the first he does two things: for first he shows how they should conduct themselves toward their wives, whom they had in the primitive Church, and he speaks for that state of affairs. Second, how toward their children, at *who [rules] his children*. Again, the first is divided into two: for first he shows what sort their wives ought to be; second, how they themselves should conduct themselves toward them, at *deacons*. In their wives he requires four things, namely chastity, modesty, sobriety, and fidelity. He says therefore: likewise, as I have said concerning deacons, I say concerning women, that it is necessary that they be *chaste*. Ecclesiasticus 26:19: *grace upon grace is a holy and modest woman*. Likewise *modest in tongue*, *not detractors*. Ecclesiasticus 10:11: *as if a serpent should bite in silence, he who detracts has nothing less than it*. Likewise *sober*, which is the greatest ornament of women. Above 2:9: *likewise also women in seemly attire, with modesty and sobriety*. Likewise *faithful*, either to God as to true faith, or to their husbands. But what fault is it of the deacon's if his wife is bad? I respond: someone is kept back from ministry not only on account of fault, but also on account of some impediment to the ministry. And therefore, even if apart from their own fault their wives could be bad, nevertheless they present an impediment in two ways: first, because when they are bad, they need greater care, and by this their husbands would have less leisure for ecclesiastical ministries; second, because husbands are corrupted by their wives. Likewise it would be a danger, because many people frequent the houses of the ministers of the Church. But the Cataphrygians said that, since among the deacons mention is made of women, women can be ordained to sacred orders. But it must be known that in law some women are sometimes called deaconesses, not because they have an order of this kind, but on account of some ministry of the Church, just as in Greek any minister is called a deacon.”

“Above the Apostle showed what sort of persons deacons and their wives ought to be; here he shows how deacons should conduct themselves toward their wives and toward their children and household. And first he sets down the teaching; second, its reason, at the words "for those who have ministered well." He says then: I said that the wives of deacons should be chaste. Although chastity must be maintained in wives on their husbands' account, it is even more necessary in the men themselves, that they be entirely free from contact with women. But because on this standard there would be few ministers, he concedes that they be at least husbands of one wife, since to have had several is a sign of incontinence and against the signification of the sacrament. And hence it is that the Lord instituted marriage of one to one. Hence also the first wife is blessed, not the second. Then he advises how they should conduct themselves toward their children, saying, "who preside well over their children," namely, by instructing them well in good discipline and life. Eccli. VII, 25: "Do you have sons? Discipline them," et cetera. Consequently he exhorts them to preside well over the whole house, that is, the household, namely with gentleness. Eccli. IV, 35: "Do not be like a lion in your house," et cetera. And he gives the reason for this, saying, "for those who have ministered well," etc.; as if to say: what you require of bishops is reasonable, because they are prelates. But why require it of a deacon, who is a minister? He answers, saying, "for those who," et cetera. And first he shows that the good use of this ministry is a way to greater dignity; second, that it is also a way to eternal life. As to the first he says, "for those who have ministered well," by exercising the office of deacon — for what in Greek is "diaconus," in Latin is called "minister" — "acquire for themselves a good degree," that is, they merit to be promoted to a higher degree. Matth. XXV, 21: "Because you have been faithful over a few things, I will set you over many," et cetera. And he says "good," because above, in the same epistle: "He who desires the episcopate desires a good work." Yet their end does not lie in this, but along with this they have a reward from God. Io. XII, 26: "I will that where I am, there also my minister may be." And therefore he says "much confidence," namely of the help of grace in the present, and of glory in the future; and this "in faith," etc., that is, through faith in Christ. II Cor. III, 4: "Such confidence we have," et cetera. Is. XII, 2: "I will act with confidence, and I will not fear." Then, when he says "these things I write to you," he gives the reason for all the aforesaid admonitions. And first he excludes a supposed cause; second, he establishes the true one, at the words "but if"; third, he assigns the reason, at the words "which is the Church." Concerning the first it should be known that Timothy might believe that, since he was writing, he would not see him thereafter, otherwise it would seem superfluous to admonish him by letter. And therefore he says, "these things I write to you, son." And he calls him son, because he was most dear to him. I Cor. IV, 17: "Therefore I have sent to you Timothy, who is my most dear son." And he says "hoping," as one not certain. II Io. I, 12: "Having many things to write to you, I would not do it by paper and ink; for I hope that I shall be with you, and speak mouth to mouth." I write, therefore, although I have hope, because hope can be drawn out at length. Prov. XVI, 1: "It is for man to prepare the soul, and for the Lord to govern the tongue." And therefore he says, "but if I tarry," et cetera. I Thess. II, 18: "But Satan hindered us." I write, therefore, in case I should tarry, that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God. Ps. LXVII, 6: "He makes those of one manner to dwell in a house," et cetera. Then, when he says "which is the Church," he assigns the reason why one ought to conduct oneself in this way in it. And he assigns the reason for this cause, which is twofold: first, by commending the Church herself; second, the unity of the Church, at the words "and manifestly." Concerning the first he does two things: first he commends the Church on the part of him whose Church she is; second, from the truth of the Church herself, at the word "pillar." On the part of him whose the Church is, because it is "of the living God." "Church" is said as it were a uniting, because in the Church there is a uniting of the faithful. Rom. VIII, 30: "Whom he called," et cetera. And they are united in God. Io. XVII, 21: "That they also may be one in us," et cetera. And therefore he says, "which is of God." And he adds "living," to distinguish it from other gods, to whom the Gentiles are gathered. For these are dead, but the God of the Church is living. Io. V, 26: "As the Father has life in himself," et cetera. One ought, then, to conduct oneself in it in such a way that we live spiritually. Ps. XCII, 7: "Holiness becomes your house, O Lord," et cetera. The second reason is from the truth of the Church. For it is natural to man to desire the knowledge of truth, since it is the perfection of the intellect. Hence Augustine says that beatitude is the end of man, which is nothing other than joy in the truth. This became known to the philosophers through creatures, Rom. I, 19. But in this they wavered, because they did not have certainty of the truth, both because they were corrupted by errors, and because it is scarcely found among them that they agree in the truth. But in the Church there is firm knowledge and truth. Hence he says "pillar." Eccli. XXIV, 7: "My throne is in a pillar of a cloud," et cetera. Eccli. XXVI, 23: "golden pillars," et cetera. And it is called golden, because holy in itself. And "firmament," namely with respect to others, because they cannot be made firm in the truth except through the sacraments of the Church. Lc. XXII, 32: "You, once converted, confirm," et cetera. Ps. LXXIV, 3: "I have confirmed its pillars." Because, therefore, the Church gathers together in God and gives knowledge of the truth, we ought to be in her. Then, when he says "and manifestly," he commends the truth of the Church. And first, Christ, for whose manifestation it appeared; second, he treats of his exaltation, at the word "taken up." Now he commends Christ in two ways. First as to the divine nature; second as to the human, at the words "which was manifested." He says then, "and manifestly," et cetera. Because "sacrament" is the same as a sacred secret. Now nothing is so secret as that which we bear in the heart. Much more, then, is that which is in the heart of God both secret and sacred. I Cor. II, 11: "The things that are of God no one knows except the Spirit of God," et cetera. Is. XXIV, 16: "My secret to myself." Is. XLV, 15: "You are a hidden God." And this is the Word of God in the heart of the Father. Ps. XLIV, 2: "My heart has uttered a good word." This secret, indeed, is "the sacrament of piety"; but the secret of man is sometimes vain. Ps. XCIII, 11: "The Lord knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain." Inasmuch, therefore, as it is restorative of the world, it is "of piety." Likewise "great," because he is true God, of whose greatness there is no end. This secret, therefore, which lies hidden in the heart of the Father, was made man. And therefore he describes him, second, as to his human nature. And first as to the flesh, second as to the soul. As to the first he says, "which was manifested in the flesh." Just as the word that lies hidden in the heart is manifested by a sensible word, so the Word of God lay hidden in the heart of God, but was manifested in the flesh. Io. I, 14: "The Word was made flesh," et cetera. As to the soul he says, "was justified in the spirit." This is explained in two ways. First, lest it be believed that the flesh was conceived first, he says that it was not, because "in the spirit," that is, he was conceived through the Holy Spirit. Matth. I, v. 20: "For that which is born of her is of the Holy Spirit." And Lc. I, 35: "For that which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God"; and this because "the Holy Spirit shall come upon you," et cetera. Or in the holy human spirit, concerning which Io. XIX, v. 30: "He gave up the spirit." And thus it was manifested in the flesh, which nevertheless is with the spirit. And I say, the spirit justified, namely because he is just, without any stain. Then, when he says "appeared," he shows his manifestation, and first as made to the Angels, second to men, at the word "preached." He says, then, that that sacrament "appeared to Angels," and it exceeds even the knowledge of the Angels. Now that is said to appear which has it in its own power to be seen and not to be seen, and is not subject to the power of the one seeing. Hence one does not say: "a stone appears to me," but "I see a stone." If, then, an Angel had it in his own nature or power to see the Word, it would not be said that the Word appeared to him, but that he himself saw it when he wished. And therefore the Apostle says that it "appeared to Angels," because they did not see it by their own nature. And it is true that from the beginning it appeared to the Angels, when by conversion to himself he edified them; but when it was incarnate, many mysteries became known to the Angels which they had not known before. And therefore Bede says that at the nativity a brightness appeared to the Angels which had not before in truth been seen by men. And this in two ways: first as to the ministry of the apostles; second as to the knowledge of the peoples to whom it is manifested. For formerly it was manifested to the Jews alone, but now among the Gentiles. And therefore he says, "was preached to the Gentiles." Matth. ult.: "Going, therefore, teach all nations," et cetera. Ps. XCV, 3: "Declare his glory among the Gentiles." And this effectively, because "it was believed in the world." And this the Lord was praying for, Io. XVII, 18. And this is especially wondrous, that through simple, poor, and powerless men the whole world was converted. I Cor. I, 26: "Not many wise," etc.; and this "that no flesh should glory," et cetera. Second, he shows that the truth of God alone does this, because "it was taken up in glory" — namely Christ — because, having been manifested, he was taken up into the heavens. Matth. ult.: "The Lord Jesus indeed, after he had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven." Phil. c. II, 11: "And every tongue should confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father."”

“Above, he instructed Timothy about the things pertaining to the ordering of the Church in spiritual matters; secondly, as to the teaching of the faith, the worship of God, and the disposition of the ministries — here he instructs him about the ordering of the Church as to external things. And first as to foods; secondly as to the states of men and riches, there: whoever are under the yoke. Again, first he treats of the use of foods, secondly of the dispensing of foods, chapter 5, there: honor widows. Again, first he excludes superstitious abstinence; secondly he prefers the piety of lawful abstinence, there: exercise yourself. Again, first he foretells the false doctrine about unlawful abstinence; secondly he instructs him to propose these things to the brothers, there: proposing these things. Again, first he makes the error manifest; secondly he excludes it, there: whom God. Again, first he foretells the error to come on the part of those deceived; secondly on the part of those who deceive, there: in hypocrisy. Again, he sets down the agent of the pronouncement; secondly, the falling-away of faith, there: because in the last; thirdly, the cause of the falling-away, there: giving heed. He says therefore: great is the sacrament of piety, which was justified in the spirit, but beyond this sacrament the Holy Spirit foretells something that is to come. For it belongs to him to reveal mysteries. II Cor. XV, v. 2 and Jn. 16:13: the things that are to come, he will announce to you. The Spirit, therefore, foretells beforehand the future secrets in the heart of the Father. But formerly he spoke in similitudes. Num. 12:6: if there be among you a prophet of the Lord, I will appear to him in a vision, or I will speak to him through a dream. Hos. 12:10: I have multiplied vision, and I have been likened in the hand of the prophets. But in the New Testament the Holy Spirit speaks openly. Jn. 16:25: and openly I will announce to you about my Father. And he foretells the falling-away of faith to come; hence he says in the last times, etc. The last time is called the final age, because we are those upon whom the ends of the ages have come. Yet within this time it is the more the last, the nearer it is to the last day. And just as in the primitive Church, on account of its nearness to Christ and to the sacraments recently instituted, faith was most fervent, so in the last times, in comparison to the time of the apostles, some will depart from the faith, because they will be carnal, but errors will abound the more toward the end. Gen. 49:1: gather together, that I may announce to you the things that are to come to you in the last days, etc. The cause of the falling-away is twofold: one on the part of the Devil who seduces. II Cor. 11:3: I fear lest, as the serpent seduced Eve by his cunning, etc. And therefore he says giving heed to spirits of error, namely to demons, whose office it is to send into error. Jn. 8:44: he is a liar, and the father of it. III Kings, last: I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit, etc. And he says spirits, because the greater demon has many ministers. But how do they give heed to them? Do they see them? No, but they speak within them. And therefore he adds a second cause, namely false doctrine. And according to the Gloss, he here calls the false teachers demons, and not undeservedly. For just as good men are sometimes called angels, so these, on account of their excelling malice, are called demons. Jn. 6:71: have I not chosen you twelve? And one of you is a devil. On the part of those who deceive there is a twofold cause: one, their falsity; the other, the perversity of their conscience. As to the first he says of demons, that is, of men possessed by a demon, and of these, I say, speaking lies. Jer. 23:26: how long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies, and that prophesy the seductions of their own heart? And note that through a bare lie, without a cloak of appearance, no one could deceive anyone. And so these could deceive no one, unless they put forward some cloak, either of good intention, or of pretense, or of false authority. I Cor. 3:18: let no one seduce you, etc. II Tim. 3:5: having indeed the appearance of piety, that is, feigned piety. And of demons, I say, having their conscience cauterized. A cautery is a corruption in the flesh by fire, from which putrefaction continually issues. So from the fire of a perverse will, of anger, of hatred, of concupiscence, the conscience is ulcerated, and from demons false doctrine issues. Tit. 1:15: their minds are defiled. Then he shows what this false doctrine is, and touches on the heresy of the Manichees, who condemn matrimony, against that word of Matt. 19:6: what God has joined together, let man not separate; I Cor. 7:36: a woman does not sin if she marries. Again, the Manichees forbid the use of foods, that is, they command abstaining from foods. Now one may lawfully abstain from foods with the intention of taming the flesh, as Timothy abstained from wine, or on account of scandal, as the Apostle says, I Cor. 8:13: if food scandalizes my brother, I will not eat meat forever. Again, unlawfully: in one way, on account of the precept of the law, as though the legal observances still had to be kept, against which he speaks in Gal. 2. In another way, according to the heresy of the Manichees, not because it is forbidden by the law (which they condemn), but because they say that in meats, eggs, and wine, and things of this kind, that is, in some particle of such things, the divine nature is mingled — which cannot be thought concerning God. But he does not seem to say this about the foods of the law, because he says in the last days, but about those forbidden by the Manichees. And he calls these Manichees demons, because among all heresies they give more honor to the Devil, because they set him up as a principle equal with the good God, positing him as the principle of visible things. Now the Apostle disproves this erroneous doctrine in two ways: namely from the intention of God who creates foods; secondly from the condition of the creature, there: every creature. He says therefore that they forbid, to abstain, and this is against the intention of God, who created them for receiving. Gen. 9:3: as the green herbs I have given you all things, etc. But you say: are not plants for the sake of animals, and animals for the sake of men? I respond. It must be said that yes, according also to the Philosopher in Politics I, because the imperfect is ordered to the more perfect. And therefore just as in generation there is a manifold perfection — first namely of plants, then of animals, and last the human — so it is in the use of things. And therefore for receiving, but with the giving of thanks. I Thess., last: in all things give thanks; namely because they have been granted to you by God. Ps. 21:26: the poor shall eat, etc. And he adds to the faithful, because those who receive with the giving of thanks are faithful. For no one can give thanks to God in that which is unlawful. For he is foolish who gives thanks to God for fornication, because God is not the author of evils. Therefore he gives thanks who has this, that the use of foods is lawful. And this indeed becomes known through faith alone. And for this reason he says to the faithful. Then when he says who have known the truth, because every, etc., he disproves the error from the condition of the creature. And first he proposes that the creature is good in itself; secondly as to its use. He says therefore every creature is good, namely in its nature. Gen. 1:31: God saw all the things that he had made, and they were very good. From a good author also nothing comes but what is good. But since many things are good in themselves, whose use nevertheless is not good, therefore he proves that every creature is good not only in itself but also as to its use. And first he sets down what is intended, secondly he proves it, there: for it is sanctified. He says therefore nothing is to be rejected, namely by the debt of the divine law, although for another cause: as eating poison, insofar as it is food, is not a sin, but it is to be rejected insofar as it is deadly. Likewise other foods too, insofar as they are such things, are not to be rejected, but insofar as they incite to wantonness. Therefore according to the discretion of reason, and the ordering of charity, they are not to be rejected. Matt. 15:11: everything that enters into the mouth does not defile a man, etc. Why then were certain foods forbidden in the old law? Augustine gives the reason against Faustus, that in that state, Christ was prefigured not only through words, but also through deeds. And therefore in foods, garments, and sacrifices there were figures of the state to come. They are not therefore forbidden in themselves, but because they are figures of unclean things, as the pig is a sign of an unclean life. And therefore the prohibition of its flesh is a sign that in the law of Christ all uncleanness is forbidden. And this is Augustine's example: this word "fatuus" can be considered according as it is a sound composed of letters, and thus it is good; or insofar as it is a sign and signifies such a thing, and thus it is bad and forbidden. Therefore the use of every creature is in itself good. The reason for this is, that if it were evil, this could not be except insofar as the Devil, after the sin of man, had received power over them: because from the moment man sinned, he received power over man, and over the things that are his. But through Christ this power has been taken away, and this is called sanctification. Hence whatever things we bless are first exorcised, and therein is a prayer expelling the Devil. And therefore he says for it is sanctified through the word of God, that is, through Christ, who sanctifies all, Jn. 17:9, and through the prayer of the faithful. Jas.: the persistent prayer of a just man avails much.”

“Above he rejected the superstitious abstinence from foods; here he charges Timothy to set before the faithful the teaching already given, and first he shows what he ought to set forth; second, what he ought to avoid, at the words "but foolish." He sets forth, therefore, two reasons why he ought to set forth what was said above: one from the office committed to him, the second from his upbringing. He therefore says, "these things" — that is, what I said above, namely that every creature is good and that nothing is to be rejected, etc. — "setting forth," and so on. For Timothy had been established in the office of the ministry of Christ, since all who have the office of preaching and ruling are established as ministers of Christ. 1 Cor. 4:1: "So let a man regard us as ministers of Christ," etc. Now he is a good minister who follows the intention of his lord. But Christ taught this: Matt. 15:11: "Nothing that enters into the mouth defiles." And therefore this office requires him to teach that. Likewise his very upbringing requires this. Prov. 22:6: "A young man, according to his way, even when he is old, will not depart from it." And therefore it is unfitting that those nourished on the truth of doctrine should depart from it. Hence one who departs from the doctrine by which the Church instructs her little ones is not a good minister of Christ. And therefore he says, "nourished on the words of the faith," etc. For the word of God is spiritual nourishment by which the soul is sustained, just as the body is by food. Matt. 4:4: "Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God." This word of faith instructs, first, concerning what is to be believed, and thus he says "nourished on the words of the faith"; second, concerning what is to be done, and thus he adds "and of good doctrine." Or: "the word of faith," which even the simple have, and "of good doctrine," which spiritual teachers have. Then, when he says "foolish," etc., he shows what is to be avoided, namely foolish and empty fables. For a fable, according to the Philosopher, is composed of marvels, and fables were first invented, as the Philosopher says in the Poetics, because the intention of men was to lead others to acquire virtues and avoid vices. But the simple are better led by representations than by reasonings. Hence in a marvel well represented delight is seen to arise, because reason delights in comparison. And just as representation in deeds is delightful, so too is representation in words; and this is a fable, namely a saying representing something, and by representing, moving toward something. For the ancients had certain fables fitted to certain truths, in which they concealed the truth under fables. There are, therefore, two things in a fable: namely, that it contain a true sense, and that it represent something useful. Likewise, that it be fitting to that truth. If, then, a fable is set forth which cannot represent any truth, it is empty; but one which does not properly represent is foolish, like the fables of the Talmud. Then, when he says "exercise," etc., having excluded superstitious abstinence, he here compares virtuous abstinence to the other virtues. And it should be known that Timothy was a man of great abstinence. Hence he says below, 5:23, that he should use a little wine — perhaps so that he might be attentive to those things which pertain to mercy, since those who do not spare themselves frequently do not spare others either. And therefore he leads him to prefer piety to abstinence. And first he leads him to piety; second, he prefers it to abstinence, at the words "for bodily"; third, he confirms a certain saying, at the words "the promise"; fourth, he gives the manner of teaching piety, at the words "command these things." He therefore says, "exercise yourself unto piety." Piety is that by which we hinder the office of benevolence toward parents and country, just as religion is that by which we render the worship owed to God. For piety implies a certain affection toward its principle. But the principle of generation is one's father and one's country. And therefore it is fitting that a man be benevolent toward them. But the Father of all is God. Mal. 1:6: "If I am a father, where is my honor?" And therefore the name of piety is extended to the worship of God, as Augustine says in Book IV of the City of God. Hence "eusebia" is the same as piety. Job 28:28: "Behold, piety itself is wisdom," according to another translation, where ours reads thus: "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom." Tit. 1:1: "in the knowledge of the truth, which is according to piety." But as regards earthly piety, it belongs to piety that a man be benevolent to his fellow-countrymen; but as regards Christian piety, it is required that a man be benevolent to all men, because we are all of the same fatherland. And therefore piety is taken for mercy. When, therefore, he says "exercise yourself unto piety," it can be understood as pertaining both to the worship of God and to the rendering of works of mercy. The Gloss: "unto piety," that is, unto the worship of almighty God, and works of mercy. And he says "exercise," not "do," because exercise implies readiness; and this is because one who is practiced does a thing more easily, more delightfully, and more steadfastly. Prov. 24:27: "Diligently exercise your field." Then, when he says, "for bodily exercise is profitable for a little," he prefers it to abstinence. And first he shows for what bodily exercise avails; second, for what piety avails, at the words "but piety." Bodily exercise — of fasting and the like — is not in its own nature good, but penal; and if man had not sinned, none of these would have existed; but they are medicinal goods. For just as rhubarb is good insofar as it relieves from bile, so also these are good insofar as they restrain the concupiscences; therefore they are useful to this small degree. 1 Cor. 9:27: "I chastise my body and bring it into subjection," etc. Col. 3:5: "Mortify your members which are upon the earth." And therefore if man were in a state in which he could not sin, he would not need fasting and the like. Hence Chrysostom, on that passage of Matt. 16, "Jesus came," etc., says: "John, a mere man, needed the medicine of fasting; Christ was God and not a mere man, and therefore did not need such things." Therefore it is profitable for a little, because it is only for the disease of carnal sin, not spiritual sin, since sometimes on account of abstinence a man falls into anger, vainglory, and the like. Then, when he says "but piety," he prefers piety to abstinence, and it is taken here in both senses, namely for the worship of God and for mercy. And it "is profitable unto all things," because it is for the blotting out of all sins. Ecclus. 3:33: "Water extinguishes a burning fire, and alms resists sins." Likewise, for the promoting of goods. Ecclus. 17:18: "The alms of a man is like a purse," etc. Likewise, it merits the special mercy of God. Matt. 5:7: "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." And therefore, to indicate this, the Lord in Matt. 25:34 especially commemorates the works of mercy. He proves this by adding, "having promise." For among the precepts of the Decalogue only one is found which pertains to piety, namely to honor father and mother; and under it are contained all the precepts for rendering any benefit whatsoever to one's neighbor; and this is the only precept, among those which concern one's neighbor, "having promise," namely, "that you may be long-lived," etc., Exod. 20:12. And the Apostle here interprets "long-lived" according to the present life and the future; hence he says, "of the life which now is, and of that which is to come." Prov. 3:16: "Length of days is in her right hand." But then there is a question, because sometimes someone is found following piety who nevertheless is not long-lived. I answer. As the Philosopher says, these temporal goods are good only insofar as they are useful for happiness. Hence if someone had so much of temporal things that on account of them he was impeded from the good of virtue and happiness, this would not be to his good fortune, but to his bad fortune, as is said in Ethics X. And length of life is one of the temporal goods, good only insofar as it helps toward virtue. But sometimes it is an occasion for sinning, and therefore God sometimes withdraws it from a man, not because he fails in his promise, but because he gives what is better. Wis. 4:11: "He was taken away, lest malice should change his understanding." There is another question, because the Apostle prefers piety to bodily exercise, since it has the hope of the present life and of the future. But does bodily exercise not have this hope? Otherwise, one who fasts would not merit eternal life. I answer. When there are two virtues and one contains the other, that which belongs to the higher virtue per se belongs to the lower accidentally; but the virtue to which it belongs per se to merit eternal life is charity, whose proper and immediate effect is piety. And therefore, according to its own proper nature, it attains to meriting eternal life. But abstinence does not, except insofar as it is ordered to charity and piety, because if one who fasts does not refer this to the love of God, he does not merit eternal life. The third question is this, because Ambrose says here in the Gloss: "The whole sum of Christian discipline consists in mercy and piety; and one who follows it, if he suffers the slipperiness of the flesh, will without doubt be beaten, yet will not perish." Here, first, there is a doubt about the first part of this, because mercy and piety are immediately ordered to charity, in which is the sum of the Christian religion. I answer. It was the opinion of some, as Augustine says in Book X of the City of God, that those who practice the works of piety, however many carnal sins they commit, do not in the end perish eternally. And this text is an authority for that. Likewise, what is found in Matt. 25:41, where he reproaches those to be damned only with the lack of mercy; therefore eternal punishment is owed only to the unmerciful. But Augustine says the contrary, because the Apostle says: "because they do such things, the kingdom of God," etc. For however much someone practices mercy, if at death he is in mortal sin, he will not enter the kingdom. To the objections it must be said that he is not merciful who has no mercy on himself, according to that saying of Ecclus. 30:24: "Have mercy on your own soul, pleasing God"; and this happens if a man is joined to God through love; otherwise he is not merciful. To that passage of the Gospel, Augustine responds that not everyone who sins is thrust into Hell immediately, because a place of repentance remains to him; but he is thrust down who dies finally in sin, and repentance pertains to mercy. But what does he mean by saying, "if the slipperiness," etc.? I answer. It must be said that he speaks of mortal slipperiness. And as to what he says, "he will not perish" — although this is not by condign merit, it is nevertheless by congruous merit, insofar as the soul is disposed toward the good; hence the Lord restores man after his fall. And this seems to be especially the case in piety, because a man, by doing good to others, leads others to pray for him; and the Lord sometimes grants pardon to sinners at the prayers of the saints, insofar as pardon of sins and the gift of grace is obtained for them, since a man can merit first grace for another by congruous merit; otherwise the Church would pray for sinners in vain. Then, when he says, "a faithful saying," he shows that the future life is promised to us; and first he shows this from the labor of the saints; second, from their hope, at the words "because we hope"; third, from the goodness of God, at the words "who is." He therefore says, "the saying" — namely, that piety has a promise — "is faithful." This was explained above. And why? "For to this end," that is, on account of this, that we may attain eternal life, "we labor." 2 Tim. 2:6: "The laboring farmer must first partake of the fruits." Likewise, that we may do good, even though we suffer evils; hence he says, "we bless, and are cursed." James 1:4: "Patience has a perfect work"; and Rom. 5:3: "Patience works proof," etc. And we endure on account of the hope of life, "because we hope in the living God," who is the Savior of the present life and of the future. Likewise, from the office of God, whose part it is to save. Isa. 43:11: "There is no savior besides me." And therefore God became incarnate, and was called Jesus. Matt. 1:21: "For he shall save his people from their sins." And Jesus is the same as Savior, because he saves — by bodily salvation, as regards all; and therefore he says, "of all men." Likewise by spiritual salvation as regards the good; and therefore he says, "and especially of the faithful."”

“Above, the Apostle exhorted Timothy to piety; here he gives him the form of teaching piety. In this he first enjoins him to teach piety; second, how he may be fit to teach, at "let no man"; third, how he should teach different people differently, at "the elder." Now the teaching of piety consists in two things, namely in things to be done and things to be believed. But as to things to be done, those who have authority ought not only to instruct, but also to command. And therefore he says, "command these things." Titus 2:15: "rebuke with all authority." As to things to be believed he says, "and teach." Matthew, last chapter: "teach all nations." Job 4:3: "behold, you have taught many." Then when he says "let no man," he shows how he can be fit for the aforesaid things, and first for commanding; second, how for teaching, at "till I come." Concerning the first he does two things, because first he teaches how he ought to exclude contempt; second he shows by what it is to be excluded, at "but be an example." A command has no efficacy except through the authority of the one commanding, and therefore when authority is despised, the command is frustrated, which happens most of all in youth, because such persons are not believed to be prudent. Hence, according to the Philosopher, no one chooses the young as leaders. And therefore he says "let no man," etc., as if to say: although you are young, let your character nonetheless represent old age. Tobit 1:4: "when he was younger." Then he shows how contempt is excluded, saying "but be," etc., namely that you show yourself such that you may be an example of doing what you teach by word. And it should be noted that in those things in which a prelate is an example, there is a manifold difference. For some are ordered toward one's neighbor, some toward God, some toward oneself. As to one's neighbor he says, "be an example of the faithful," namely that what you command by word, you fulfill by deed. 1 Peter, last chapter, 3: "made a pattern of the flock," etc. And this in speech; hence he says "in word," namely, weighed, ordered, and circumspect. Colossians 4:6: "let your speech be always seasoned with the salt of grace." 1 Peter 4:11: "if any man speak, as the words of God." Likewise in outward conduct, that as he excels in place and dignity, so also in honest conduct. 1 Peter 2:12: "having your conduct good among the Gentiles," etc. Matthew 5:16: "let them see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven." As to God, it is ordered by charity, which perfects the affection; hence he says "in charity." 1 Corinthians 13:1: "if I speak with the tongues of men," etc. Colossians 3:14: "above all things having charity." Likewise through faith, which illumines the intellect; hence he says "in faith." Hebrews 11:6: "without faith it is impossible to please God." Which especially befits prelates, who are the guardians of the faith. Hence in Luke 22:32 the Lord especially prays for the faith of Peter, saying: "I have prayed for you, Peter, that your faith may not fail." As to himself, chastity orders life and mind, because it is exceedingly unbecoming that the life of the ministers should disagree with the life of the Lord. Ecclesiasticus 10:2: "as the judge of the people is, so also are his ministers." But Christ so loved chastity that he willed to be born of a virgin, and he himself kept it; therefore there follows "in chastity." Then when he says "till I come," etc., he shows how one may be fit to teach, and first he does this; second he assigns the reason for the aforesaid admonition, at "do not neglect." Now one is fit to teach through two things, namely through reading, in which he acquires knowledge, and through practice, in which he is made ready. And therefore he says, "till I come, attend to reading," namely of the holy books. 1 Maccabees 12:9: "having for our comfort the holy books." John 5:39: "search the Scriptures." And this is signified in Exodus 25:12ff, where it is said that in the ark of the Lord the staves should always be in the rings, and the rings in the corners: as if always ready to be carried. But for practice, exhortation is necessary on our part as to things to be done, doctrine as to things to be known. Therefore he adds, "to exhortation and to doctrine." Jeremiah 3:15: "I will give you pastors according to my own heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine." Then when he says "do not," he sets forth the reason for the aforesaid admonition; and first he sets forth the cause from the gift received; second, the cause from the reward expected, at "take heed to yourself." Likewise, first he sets forth the reason; second he shows how what is contained in the reason can be fulfilled, at "meditate upon these things." He says therefore "do not," etc.; as if to say: rather attend, because he who receives grace ought not to be negligent in it, but ought to bear fruit from it. The servant who hides money in the earth is punished on account of negligence. Matthew 25:24ff. "Do not, therefore, neglect the grace," etc. By this understand either the episcopal dignity, or the gift of knowledge, or of prophecy, or of miracles, none of which ought to be neglected. 2 Corinthians 6:1: "that you receive not the grace of God in vain." I say the grace "which was given you by prophecy," that is, by divine inspiration. For in the primitive Church, where elections were made purely and for God's sake, no one was assumed into the episcopate except through divine election, just as Ambrose and Nicholas were elected. And this inspiration he here calls prophecy. Hence the Gloss says, that is, through the election of the saints, because the saints did not elect one whom they did not know to have been elected by God. Likewise the Apostle foresaw that this one would be profitable to the people. Proverbs 29:18: "when prophecy shall fail," that is, such a manner of election, "the people shall be scattered." And how? "With the imposition of the hand of the priest." Another text has "of the hands of the presbytery." And, as has been said, the names "presbyter" and "bishop" are interchangeable, because it was priests and presbyters, that is, bishops, who were received with the imposition of the hand. Numbers 27:18: "call Joshua, and lay your hand upon him," etc. The Lord also laid his hand on the children, as is said in Matthew 19:15. Likewise the apostles on the seven deacons, Acts 6:6. And therefore hands are laid upon those to be ordained bishop. But the question is, since a bishop ought to be ordained by three, why is it here said "of the priest" in the singular number? I answer: he says this because although many come together, nevertheless one is the principal and the others are co-assistants. Yet it can be said that at that time this constitution did not yet exist, and then there were few bishops, who could not be gathered together. Another text has "of the presbytery," that is, of those who laid hands upon him, not insofar as they were men, but insofar as they were presbyters. And this imposition signifies the conferral of grace, not that the ministers give grace, but that they signify the grace given by Christ. Hence it belongs only to those who are ministers of Christ. And therefore he says "of the presbytery," or "of the priest," because the imposition of hands is one thing when done by deacons, and another when done by presbyters. Then when he says "meditate upon these things," he shows how what has been said may be fulfilled, namely that he should continually meditate on those things which pertain to his office. Hebrews, last chapter: "for they watch as being to render an account for your souls." "Meditate upon these things," therefore, that is, frequently consider, the things that pertain to the care of your flock. "Be in these things," that is, let your whole strength be directed to this. And why? "That your progress may be manifest to all." Matthew 5:15: "no man lights a lamp and puts it in a hidden place," etc. Philippians 4:5: "let your modesty be known to all men." And these things he ought to observe on account of the reward expected, on account of which he adds, saying, "take heed to yourself and to doctrine." Some so attend to doctrine that they neglect care of themselves; but the Apostle says that he should first attend to himself, and afterward to doctrine. Ecclesiasticus 30:24: "have pity on your own soul, pleasing God." Hence Jesus began to do and to teach. "Be earnest in these things," that is, exercise them earnestly. 2 Timothy 4:2: "be earnest in season." And the fruit from this will be abundant, because "in doing this, both yourself," etc. And this is a great thing. James 5:20: "he who causes a sinner to be converted from the error of his way shall save his soul from death." Daniel 12:3: "those who instruct many unto justice, as stars," etc. Hence to teachers is owed the reward of the aureole. Then when he says "the elder," etc., he shows how he ought to impart his teaching differently to different people, and he sets forth two diversities: one according to age; the other according to sex. According to age: first as to men, second as to women, at "the elder women," etc. He says therefore, "the elder," etc., "but entreat him as a father," Leviticus 19:32: "honor the person of the aged." And therefore they are not to be rebuked bitingly, but to be entreated. 1 Peter 5:1: "the elders who are among you, I, a fellow elder, entreat." And if Peter, an elder, did this, how much more ought a young man to do this? But against this, Isaiah 65:20: "the child of a hundred years shall die, and the sinner of a hundred years shall be accursed." I answer: it must be said that an old man, on account of exceeding malice, loses the honor of old age, and then he is to be rebuked. "The young men, as brothers." Matthew 23:8: "you are all brothers." Ezekiel 34:4: "with austerity you will rule over them." On the part of women there is a difference of ages, because "the elder women as mothers," especially those who are not young; below, 5:3: "honor widows." "The younger, as sisters," out of the love of charity. And this, "in all chastity." Because spiritual love toward women, unless it is cautious, degenerates into carnal love, therefore in those things which pertain to young women, chastity must be applied; and therefore the Apostle adds this. Hence the Pope, writing to them, says: "to the beloved in Christ." But to men he says simply: "to the beloved sons."”

“Above he instructed Timothy about the use of foods and about abstinence; here he instructs him about the dispensing of foods, which is done for spiritual persons, namely those which were dispensed to widows and to teachers. First, therefore, he instructs him about widows; second, about teachers, at the words *and those who rule well*. Concerning the first, first he shows how food is to be ministered to widows and teachers through the Church; second, what sort of widow is to be chosen, at the words *let a widow be chosen*. Again, first he shows to which widows help is to be given; second he makes clear what he has said, at the words *but if any*; third he shows the reason for what has been said, at the words *if anyone*. He says therefore, *honor widows*, not only by showing reverence, but by supplying necessities. For these two things are understood in the word "honor." Hence in the precept of honoring one's parents, support is also understood; as if he were to say: provide for their necessities. And this was begun from the beginning of the Church. Acts 6:1: *there arose a murmuring of the Greeks against the Hebrews, because their widows were being neglected in the daily ministration.* 2 Maccabees 3:10: *in the temple money had been deposited for the sustenance of widows and orphans.* But which widows? Those who are truly widows. A widow (*vidua*) is called as if it were "idua" from a husband (*vir*), that is, divided. For she is truly a widow who has no other persons by whom she may be sustained, and to her the necessities were given from the alms of the faithful. Then, when he says *but if any*, he explains which are truly widows; and first he shows which are not truly so; second, which are truly so, at the words *but she who*. Concerning the first, first he treats of the instruction of those who are truly widows; second he assigns the reason, at the words *for this*. He instructs, therefore, such as these, that they should learn to rule their own house. Tobit 10:13: *they taught their daughter to rule the household.* And he says *first*, because the widow who is taken up for provision to be made for her by the Church ought to be watchful with honesty. And this is what he means by *let her learn*. Again, she ought to serve her own parents, and therefore he says *a return*, etc., as if to say: just as her parents nourished her, so she too should nourish them, if she has them. And the reason for this is assigned when he adds, saying *for this is acceptable*, etc. Because these things are done not only for men, but for God. And this is clear, because the Lord gave a special commandment about this, Exodus 20:12. Which the Lord Jesus also did not wish to be omitted in the Gospel. Again, nature teaches this, that a man should repay benefits to those who bestow them. But no one has bestowed so much as parents. Then, when he says *but she who is truly*, he treats of true widows. First showing which are truly widows; second, how they are to be instructed, at the words *let her hope in God*. He says therefore, *but she who is truly a widow and desolate*, that is, who has no human consolation, namely children or parents, and such a one who has no other refuge, *let her hope in God*, even as regards the temporal aid sustained through the Church. And she ought to be instructed, first, that she be exercised in good things; second, that she beware of evils, at the words *and this command*. Concerning the first he does two things, because first he shows with what this widow ought to be occupied; second he assigns the reason, at the words *for the widow*. He says therefore *let her hope in God*, and let her exercise the act of hope that is fitting, which is done through prayer and supplication, through which what is hoped for is obtained. For prayer is a raising of the mind to God; supplication is a petition made through certain sacred things. And therefore he adds, *and let her continue in supplications and prayers*. And he says *day and night*, because it is impossible that a man's mind be without some care. And therefore, since the widow has nothing to be occupied with, she ought always to be at leisure for God. Luke 2:37: *Anna did not depart from the temple*, etc. Judith 8:5: *she made a chamber in the upper part for praying*. Then, when he says *for she who*, he gives the reason why she ought always to be at leisure for prayer, namely because it is impossible that the mind not be occupied about some delight. And since the mind of one who is idle is not occupied with useful things, it must be occupied with carnal things. And therefore he says that a widow thus desolate should be at leisure for prayer, because if she does not have this occupation, she gives herself to delights, and thus is dead with the death of sin. Apocalypse 3:1: *you have a name, that you live, and you are dead.* Isaiah 38:19: *the living, namely inwardly, the living, namely outwardly, shall confess to you.* And although delights are an occasion of death for all men, yet especially for women, because by their nature they have a softness of mind. Since therefore delights soften the mind, it is necessary that women be softened much more. Jeremiah 31:22: *how long will you be dissolved in delights, wandering daughter?* Apocalypse 18:7: *as much as she glorified herself and was in delights, so much give to her torment and mourning.* Then, when he says *and this command*, he shows that they must be instructed to beware of evils. And therefore he says that they should also forbid this, commanding that the women who are sustained by the Church should be irreproachable. Psalm 92:7: *holiness befits your house, O Lord.* Then, when he says *but if anyone*, he assigns the reason for what he has said: *let her learn first*, etc., saying that it is necessary that the widow be instructed concerning this, because this is a matter of necessity. And therefore he says *of his own*, namely those whose care falls upon him, and especially *of his household*. Song of Songs 2:4: *he ordered charity in me.* And as Augustine says, we can wish well to all, but those who are joined to us are reckoned as a certain lot, and therefore are to be loved more. Ambrose in the book *On Duties* says that the reason for this is that perhaps for those for whom it is not shameful to receive from their own, it would be shameful to receive from others. *He has denied the faith*, by works, because if he does not keep faith with those whom nature has joined to him, it follows that he does not keep it with others either. Titus 1:16: *they profess that they know God, but by their deeds they deny him.* But is this indeed true? *And he is worse than an infidel.* The contrary of this seems to appear through Augustine, John 15: *if I had not come*, etc. For upon this he says that there he is speaking of the sin of infidelity, which is graver than the rest of sins, because sins against God are graver than those against one's neighbor. I respond that the state of the faithful compared to the infidel can be considered in two ways. First, as regards the state of sin, and in this way infidels are in a worse state, because they do nothing acceptable to God. Second, as regards one particular sin, and then the contrary is the case; for if a believer and an infidel commit adultery, the believer sins more, because he does injury to the faith. And thus he says that if a believer neglects the care of his parents, he sins more gravely than if an infidel were to do this. 2 Peter 2:21: *it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than after having known it to turn back*, etc.”

“Above he showed that widows are to be supported by the Church; here he shows what sort are to be supported. And first he shows what sort is to be chosen, second what sort is to be avoided, at the place "younger women." Concerning the first he does three things: first he shows that she is to be chosen on the basis of age; second, on the basis of chastity; third, on the basis of the practice of good works. By age, since "sixty years." But concerning which choosing is he treating? To this it can be answered in two ways. In one way, that he speaks of the choosing by which one is chosen to preside over the governance of the other widows who were being supported by the Church, so that such an elder woman should be set over them, so that no one might suspect anything of her continence. Numbers 4:3: "from thirty years and upward, even unto fifty years," etc. But it seems to the contrary, because the Church does the opposite, since younger women become abbesses. I respond: it must be said that it is disordered that girls too young should become abbesses, but nevertheless the Church's diligence is not as great in those who are enclosed as in those who are free. In another way, that he speaks of the choosing by which one is chosen for this, that she be supported by the stipends of the Church, and such a one is to be chosen not less than sixty years, because young women can labor with their hands, just as the apostle also, who although he could live from the Gospel, nevertheless labored; but old women rest. From chastity also a widow is to be chosen; therefore he says "who was the wife of one man." For just as it is required in a bishop that he be the husband of one wife, so in an old woman, that she be the wife of one husband. The Gloss: he says this on account of the aforesaid sacrament. This Gloss is a magisterial opinion and is of little worth. For the reason does not seem to be taken from any sacrament, since women do not receive any sacraments to be administered. But he says this on account of firmness, namely that they might have a continuous resolve of preserving widowhood. But Jerome, in the letter to Geruntia, elsewhere to Esicia, assigns another reason, namely that among the gentiles the custom was that in the sacred rites of the gods no woman presided who had had two husbands. And therefore the apostle wished that those who were being nourished by the sustenance of the Church should be no less chaste. Judith 15:11: "because you have loved chastity, and after your husband have not known another," etc. Luke 2:36: "she lived seven years with her husband from her virginity." And therefore it is, as it were, a praiseworthy sign of chastity, that she was the wife of one man. Then, when he says "in good works," etc., he shows that a widow is to be chosen on the basis of the practice of good works, and first in general; second in particular, at the place "if she has brought up children"; third he gives the same to be understood concerning all good works, at the place "if every work." As to the first he says "in good works." Proverbs, last chapter, 31: "let her works praise her in the gates." And he says "having testimony." John 5:36: "the works which the Father has given me to perform, these works which I do, bear testimony concerning me." For exterior works show interior faith. James 2:18: "show me your faith without works, and I will show you my faith from works." But what works? First toward her own, second toward others. Toward her own he says "if she has brought up children," namely in the fear of God and in chastity. Ecclesiasticus 7:25: "do you have sons? Instruct them." As to others, he touches on three works of piety. First, toward mercy, because women having a soft heart are naturally merciful. First, therefore, he teaches hospitality, at the place "if she has received by hospitality." Romans 12:13: "pursuing hospitality." Second, together with this he sets down humility, saying "if she has washed the feet of the saints"; for thus the saints are to be received and treated honorably. Luke 10:40: "but Martha was busy about much serving." Thus Christ, John 13:14: "if therefore I, the Lord and Master, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another's feet." The Gloss of Augustine on John: brothers do this to one another even in the visible work itself, and what they do not do with the hand, they do not do with the heart. But it is much better that it be done also with the hands, and let not the Christian disdain to do what Christ did. For he who bows down to the feet of his brother, in him humility is stirred up in the heart, or if it was already present, the effect of humility is confirmed. Third, fortitude and constancy, namely that she assist those in tribulation; hence he says "if she has ministered to those suffering tribulation." Hebrews 10:34: "you had compassion on those in bonds." Then, when he says "if every work," he concludes in what things she ought to be good, saying "if she has followed every good work," that is, has pursued it. Galatians 6:10: "while we have time, let us work good toward all." Then, when he says "younger women," etc., he shows which are to be avoided. And first he shows this; second he assigns the reason, at the place "for when they have grown wanton." He says therefore: let widows of such an age be chosen, but "avoid younger widows," that is, do not receive them indiscriminately for support in the Church, especially the disreputable and the dissolute. Or, avoid them as to companionship and familiarity. Ecclesiasticus 42:14: "better is the iniquity of a man," that is, safer to dwell with, "than a woman doing good"; hence there it is added: "and a woman bringing shame unto reproach." The first exposition is the literal one. Then, when he says "for when they have grown wanton," etc., a twofold reason is assigned from the twofold danger which threatens. Concerning the first he does two things: first he sets forth the first, second he responds to a question, at the place "having damnation." For if young women are taken up for the support of the Church, two things follow, namely that they have sufficiency, and that they are not compelled to work with their hands. But from each a danger threatens. From the first, the danger of chastity; hence he says "for when they have grown wanton." Luxuria is sometimes taken for the superfluity of the venereal act, and thus it is one of the seven capital vices; but sometimes it is taken for every superfluity of bodily things, and thus it is taken here — as if he were to say: when they have had superabundance "in Christ," that is, through the support of Christ, then they wish to marry. Exodus 32:6: "the people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play." Valerius says that from Ceres, that is, food, and father Liber, the way is near to Venus. Hosea 4:10: "they will eat, and will not be satisfied; they have fornicated, and have not ceased," etc. Then, when he says "having," etc., he responds to a tacit question. For someone could say: what evil indeed is it if they marry? For you yourself say, 1 Corinthians 7:28: "a woman does not sin if she marries." Therefore he says: in this they have damnation, because "their first faith," etc., namely of chastity, which they had vowed. For otherwise they would not have been taken up for maintenance. Hence Augustine says here, that from the resolve alone one incurs damnation. This is true if it be toward a determinate purpose and with consent. Ecclesiasticus 5:3: "if you have vowed anything to God, do not delay to pay it." Luke 9:6: "no one putting his hand to the plow and looking back is fit for the kingdom of God." From the second, namely that they do not labor, three evils follow. The first evil is idleness. Ecclesiasticus 33:29: "idleness has taught much malice." Ezekiel 16:49: "this was the iniquity of Sodom your sister: pride, fullness of bread, and abundance, and idleness." Proverbs 12:11: "he who pursues idleness is most foolish." From idleness these evils follow. The heart of a woman is not firm as that of a man, and on account of this it is moved toward diverse things. If therefore she is not bound to work, she must needs be carried toward diverse things. And therefore it is a danger that women be idle; hence the ancients kept them occupied. Likewise they become unstable as to place, because they learn to go about the houses. Proverbs 7:12: "now abroad, now in the streets, now lying in wait near the corners." Jeremiah 14:10: "she has loved to move her feet, and has not rested, and has not pleased the Lord." As to words he says "talkative." For since they are not occupied, they give themselves much to trifles. Proverbs 7:10: "garrulous, wandering, impatient of rest." As to the heart, "curious," because since they are not occupied in their own affairs, they meddle in others', and therefore they speak what is not fitting, because they pass judgment on the deeds of all. Ecclesiasticus 9:11: "her conversation burns like fire." Then, when he says "I wish therefore," etc., he shows to what work they are to be applied, namely that they marry. And first he sets forth the teaching, second he assigns the reason, at the place "for already." He says therefore "I wish the younger," namely widows, "to marry." Against this, 1 Corinthians 7:8: "it is good for them if they remain so"; therefore he ought rather to say: I wish them to remain continent. I respond: Jerome says that that saying, 1 Corinthians 7:7, he willed from his principal intention, but each one has his own gift from God. And therefore he adds: "it is better to marry than to burn." And therefore it must be seen in what case he here speaks — namely in this, lest they make void their first faith — and therefore what he says here, "I wish," is understood not from his principal intention. "To bear children," and not to kill them secretly through abortion. Above, 2:15: "but she shall be saved through the bearing of children, if she shall have continued in faith." "To be mothers of households," namely that they be occupied, and not run about the houses as talkative women. And also this I wish, "that they give no occasion to the adversary," that is, either to the Devil, or to the gentile, "for reviling's sake," that is, that he may be able to revile the Churches of God. In which he thus concludes the life of widows, that they should live in such a way that in nothing do they provoke others to wantonness. 1 Peter 2:15: "if it is the will of God, that by doing well you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men." And this is his reason: that certain women, having vowed chastity, have turned back, making void their vow. And such go after Satan, through imitation, because he apostatized from the fellowship of the Angels. Then, when he says "if any," he shows which widows are to be supported by private persons; and first he sets forth the teaching, second the reason, at the place "that it be not burdened." He says therefore that she who is truly a widow should hope in God, but now, that if any has brothers or kin, she should be supported by them. And therefore he says "if any believer," etc., because this is a work of piety. And this, "that the Church be not burdened," etc. And this was necessary, because at that time the Church did not have possessions, but now it has possessions set apart for this. 1 Thessalonians 2:9: "working night and day, that we might not burden any of you."”

“Above he treated of the widows who are to be honored, who were supported by the stipends of the Church; here he treats of the honoring of presbyters; and first he instructs Timothy how he should conduct himself toward them; secondly he shows how certain things said are to be understood, at the words "of certain men." Again, first he shows that presbyters are to be honored; secondly he confirms this by authority, at the words "for the Scripture says." Concerning the first he does two things: first he shows that they are to be honored; secondly he shows for what reason honor is owed to them, at the words "especially those who." He says therefore, "the presbyters who rule well." Presbyter is the same as elder, and just as those advanced in age are accustomed to have prudence—Job 12:12: "in length of time is prudence"—so too one who is taken up for the governance of the Church ought to be prudent, Luke 12:42: "the faithful and prudent servant," etc. And therefore the prelates of the Church, namely bishops and priests, are called presbyters. And therefore he says "who rule," etc. Nor is this alone enough, but it is fitting that they rule well, namely for the honor of God, and not for their own advantage. Ezekiel 34:2: "Woe to the shepherds of Israel, who fed themselves." Likewise let him be prudent, so as to give to each in his own time. 1 Corinthians 4:2: "here now it is required among stewards, that a man be found faithful." These are worthy of double honor, of which one is in the ministering of necessary things. Tobit 1:16: "of those things by which he had been honored by the king, he had ten talents of silver," etc. Proverbs 3:9: "honor the Lord with your substance." The other is in the showing of reverence. Ecclesiasticus 4:7: "humble your soul to the presbyter." Hebrews 13:17: "obey your prelates." Proverbs, the last chapter: "all her household are clothed with double garments." Isaiah 61:7: "in their land they shall possess double." But this honor is especially and chiefly to be shown to those who merit it by their labor, namely those who labor in the word of preaching. Philippians 2:15: "among whom you shine as lights in the world, holding forth the word of life." Colossians 3:16: "let the word of Christ dwell in you abundantly, teaching in all wisdom." Likewise "in doctrine," that is, in teaching. Jeremiah 3:15: "I will give you shepherds according to my heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine." And Ephesians 4:11 joins pastors and teachers, because this is the office of a bishop. Then when he says "for the Scripture says," he proves it by a twofold authority, and he introduces one according to the mystical sense, the other according to the literal, at the words "he is worthy." He says therefore "for the Scripture says," namely Deuteronomy 25:4: "you shall not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treads out the grain." In 1 Corinthians 9:8 the Apostle proves that this is to be understood of teachers, because God has no care for oxen—not that they are not subject to divine providence, but because God has no care about how men treat oxen, who can use them as they wish. Hence that law is not about oxen, but is said by way of likeness. As if he were to say: do not forbid the man who labors in the office of preaching and governance to live from that office. For by oxen are understood teachers. Proverbs 14:4: "where there are many crops, there the strength of the ox is manifest." By the harvests, the faithful. Matthew 9:37: "the harvest indeed is great," etc. Therefore preachers and teachers are not to be forbidden from having their expenses. The other authority is "the laborer is worthy of his food," Matthew 7. Or rather it is in the Old Testament, although it is not written exactly thus. Nor was it the Apostle's custom to adduce an authority from the Gospel, except with an express statement of who is speaking; but this is taken from Leviticus 9: "the wages of your hired man shall not remain with you until morning." But are these expenses truly wages? Augustine says in the Gloss that they are: "yet the Gospel is not for sale, that it should be preached for these things." For "wages" is sometimes said of what is rendered to a man as a final reward, and thus far be it that the wages of preachers should be expenses of this kind; sometimes "wages" is said only of that by which one is made worthy through laboring, and in this broad sense it is here called wages. And therefore Augustine says: "let them receive, therefore," etc. Then when he says "against a presbyter," he treats of the correction of a presbyter, saying that presbyters who rule well are to be honored with double honor, but the wicked are to be corrected. Concerning this he does three things. First he says that an accusation against them should not be readily admitted; secondly, that the guilty are to be publicly corrected, at the word "those who sin"; thirdly, that they should not be condemned rashly, at the words "without prejudice." He says therefore: you, the greater presbyter, do not admit an accusation against a presbyter, etc. Two suffice, if they are good. The reason for this saying is given in the Gloss, that a person of so high an order, who stands in the place of Christ, is not easily to be accused. But this does not seem sufficient, because the accusation of others is admitted only under two or three witnesses. Deuteronomy 17:6: "by the mouth of two or three witnesses shall he perish who is put to death." Hence it should be noted that it is one thing to receive an accusation, and another to condemn the accused; the judge ought not to condemn the latter, except when he has been convicted by witnesses, and this in the case of common men; but he ought not to receive an accusation against a priest, unless it is evident. Then when he says "those who sin," etc., he shows how one is to be punished if it is proved against him; and first he shows that he should correct him publicly; secondly he adjures him to observe these things, at the words "I charge before." He says therefore, "those who sin"—whether presbyters or anyone at all—"rebuke before all." And why? "That the rest also may have fear." Yet the procedure differs in fraternal correction and in judicial correction, because the judge bears a public role, and therefore ought to attend to the common good, which is harmed by public sin, since many are scandalized. And therefore the ecclesiastical judge ought to punish publicly in such a way that others may be edified. Ecclesiastes 8:11: "because sentence is not speedily pronounced against the evil, the children of men commit evils without any fear." Proverbs 19:25: "the pestilent man being scourged, the fool will become wiser." Note that he says "before all." But against this is Matthew 18:15: "if your brother sins against you, reprove him between you and him alone," etc. Augustine answers in the Gloss: distinguish the times and the sin, because one thing is a hidden sin, another a public one. But the first requires a hidden remedy, that is, it must be reproved secretly, and it is of this that the Lord speaks. Hence he says "against you," namely you alone, as it were secretly. But the Apostle speaks of public sin, which requires public punishment. And this is signified in the dead whom the Lord raised. In Matthew 9:25, he raised the girl within the house, by which a hidden sin is understood, and hence he also cast out the crowd at that time; but in Luke 7:12, the widow's son outside the gate, before all, by which it is shown that a public sin is to be publicly punished. Then he says "I charge," etc., because the ecclesiastical judge, in judging, above all bears the person of God, and therefore he is to be adjured by God, that he may judge justly. For he ought so to rebuke before all, that he does not despise the judgment of God. Here he shows three things. The first is the divine authority, because God the Father will judge by authority; therefore he says "before God." Genesis 18:25: "you judge all the earth." Likewise Christ as man, as appearing in judgment. John 5:27: "he gave him power to execute judgment, because he is the Son of man." And therefore he says "and Christ Jesus." Likewise the Angels, as ministers. Matthew 25:31: "when the Son of man shall come in his majesty, and all the Angels with him, then he shall sit upon the seat of his majesty." Therefore he adds "before the Angels." Job 10:17: "you renew your witnesses against me." Then when he says "without prejudice," he removes rash judgment, saying "without prejudice," that is, that you should not proceed rashly, but with deliberation, "doing nothing," namely by inclining to either side. Or "without prejudice," that is, without a preceding examination. Ecclesiasticus 33:30: "without judgment do nothing weighty." Job 29:16: "the cause which I knew not, I searched out most diligently"—otherwise you would not be a mediator between the parties. Exodus 23:6: "you shall not incline the judgment of the poor." Then when he says "lay hands hastily on no man," he treats of promotion, and this seems to be the reason for the first point. For just as he ought not to punish hastily, so neither should he promote hastily, that is, ordain easily to sacred orders. Above, 3:10: "and let these first be proved," etc. Numbers 11:16: "gather to me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom you know to be the elders of the people, and masters," as if to say: those whom it is clear to you are fit. And why? "Neither be partaker of other men's sins," because if you promote in a disordered way, and from this a sin should befall them, or the people, this will be imputed to you. Or he is a partaker of others' sins, because he does not correct when he can. Romans 1:32: "they are worthy of death, not only who do these things, but also who consent to those who do them." Isaiah 52:11: "touch not the polluted thing." Then when he says "yourself," etc., he shows how he ought to conduct himself toward himself. And this quite reasonably, because it happens that someone is so carried toward others that he neglects himself; and so first he exhorts him to chastity; secondly, from this he checks his immoderate abstinence, at the words "do not still," etc. He says therefore: you, who ought to correct others, "keep yourself chaste," etc. 1 Corinthians 9:27: "I chastise my body, and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become reprobate." This Timothy, indeed, was of excessive abstinence, and macerated his body to avoid the sins of the flesh. Ecclesiastes 2:3: "thinking in my heart to withdraw my flesh from wine," etc. And because on account of this he was altogether infirm, therefore he says "do not still," after you are infirm, "drink water." And why? Because Leviticus 2:13: "whatever sacrifice you shall offer, you shall season with salt," namely of discretion. Romans 12:1: "your reasonable service." And therefore he says "use a little wine." Not unto drunkenness. Ecclesiasticus 31:36: "wine drunk with moderation is the joy of the soul and the heart." "For your stomach's sake, and your frequent infirmities," namely those which came upon you from abstinence. The Gloss: for one must labor, that if it can be done, the office begun may be advanced gradually, rather than diminished through lack of consideration. But it should be noted that Paul healed the infirm, and raised the dead, and yet he treats Timothy by the counsel of medicine; by which it is given to be understood that he did not use miracles toward everyone, but only when it was expedient for the sake of the faith. Then when he says "of certain," etc., he shows how the two things he said are to be understood, namely that nothing is to be done in condemnations without prejudice; and likewise "lay hands hastily," etc. And first the first, secondly the second. As to the first he says "for the sins of certain," etc., as if to say: above I said "without prejudice," etc., yet you ought to apply consideration, because some sins are notorious, and these do not need examination; some are hidden, and these do need it. Hence it is truly in the case of the latter that "without prejudice" is to be understood, and not in the former, because those precede judgment, but these follow, namely the manifestation through examination not then to be made public. Proverbs 27:19: "as in waters the faces of those who look shine, so the hearts of men are manifest to the prudent." Secondly he said: "lay hands hastily," etc., which he says is to be understood in the case of those not manifestly good, because likewise the good deeds of some are manifest. Matthew 5:46: "let them see your good works, and glorify your Father." John 3:21: "but he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be made manifest." "Those which are otherwise," that is, which are not manifest, "cannot be hidden," because Matthew 10:26: "nothing is covered that shall not be revealed, and hidden that shall not be known," because either in the future, or even here, all iniquity is made manifest. And in these there is no easy laying on of hands.”

“Above the apostle instructed Timothy about the use of foods and about the persons to whom the Church ministered nourishment; here he treats of other persons belonging to the people of the Church. And first, of persons of the lowest condition; second, of persons of higher condition, there, *to the rich*. Concerning the first he does three things: for first he sets down instruction about servants; second he refutes the contrary assertion, there, *if anyone otherwise*; third he warns them to avoid the contrary and to keep to what has been said, there, *but you*. Again, the first is divided into two: first he shows what is to be held; second he teaches that this is to be taught, there, *teach these things*. Again, first he shows how servants should conduct themselves toward unbelieving masters; second, how toward believing ones, there, *but those who*. He says therefore: *whoever are servants under the yoke*, namely, on account of servile condition, which is called a yoke by a likeness; because just as oxen are held under a yoke, so that it is not permitted them to go where they wish, so servants are under a master, so that it is not permitted them to do what they wish. Gal. 5:1: *do not again be held under the yoke of servitude*. *With all honor*, that is, with due reverence. Eph. 6:5: *servants, obey your carnal masters with all fear and trembling, in simplicity of your heart, as to Christ*. The reason for this is *lest the name of the Lord and the doctrine be blasphemed*. For if masters, seeing their unbelieving servants rebellious out of regard for the faith, they would condemn the name of Christ and blaspheme our doctrine. Rom. 2:24: *the name of Christ is blasphemed through you*. Those, therefore, who have unbelieving masters, let them obey them, lest the name of God, etc. But how toward believers? *But those who have believing masters, let them not despise them*, which sometimes happens, when familiarity is shown to those of lowest station, namely, that they are puffed up into pride. Prov. 30:21: *by three things the earth is moved, and a fourth it cannot bear: by a servant when he reigns*. And the reason for this, according to the Philosopher, is that men reason falsely in such matters; for if in one respect they see themselves equal, they believe that they are equal in all things, and are unwilling to be subject to them in anything, just as in civil wars, because the common people are not subject, they believe that they are wholly equal to the nobles. And thus it could happen that servants, seeing themselves equal to their masters in some respect, namely in faith, might reckon themselves simply equal. And therefore he says *let them not despise them*. And he sets down three things. The first is the gift of faith. Hence he says *because they are believers*, and this is very great, because the just man lives by faith. Also by it the world is overcome. The second is the dignity of divine love; therefore he says *beloved*, namely, more excellently than other creatures, because they are adopted as sons of God. 1 Jn. 3:1: *see what manner of love the Father has given us, that we should be called and should be sons of God*. The third is the benefit of grace; therefore he says *because they are partakers of the benefit*, namely as regards the sacrament of the Lord. 1 Cor. 10:16: *the bread which we break, is it not a sharing in the body of the Lord?* Ps. 118:63: *I am a partaker with all who fear you*. *Teach these things*, namely to those who do not know, *and exhort*, that those who know may fulfill them. Titus 2:15: *speak these things*, etc. Then, when he says *if anyone*, he excludes the contrary assertion. And first the manner of false doctrine; second its root, there, *proud*; third its effect, there, *from which*. If you wish to know what doctrine is erroneous, he shows this from three things. First, if it is contrary to ecclesiastical doctrine. And therefore he says *if anyone teaches otherwise*, namely than I and the other apostles, as to the first. Gal. 1:9: *if anyone preaches a gospel to you other than what you have received, let him be anathema*. For the doctrine of the apostles and prophets is called canonical, because it is, as it were, the rule of our understanding. And therefore no one ought to teach otherwise. Deut. 4:2: *you shall not add to the word which I speak to you, nor take away from it*. Apoc. ult.: *if anyone adds to these things, God will add upon him the plagues written in this book*. As to the second he says *and does not consent*, etc. For the Lord Jesus came that he might bear witness to the truth. Jn. 18:37: *for this I was born, and for this I came into the world, that I might bear witness to the truth*. And therefore he was sent by the Father as teacher and master. 1 Macc. 2:65: *listen to him always, and he will be a father to you*, etc. And therefore whoever does not consent to his words is in error. 1 Kings 15:23: *to rebel is like the sin of divination, and to be unwilling to consent is like the crime of idolatry*. And he says *sound*, because in the words of Christ there is nothing of corruption, nothing of falsity or perversity, because they are the words of divine wisdom. Prov. 8:8-9: *my words are just, there is nothing crooked or perverse in them; they are right to those who understand, and equitable to those who find knowledge*. As to the third, Prov. 6:20: *keep, my son, the precepts of your father, and do not abandon the law of your mother*. Hence he says *and to that doctrine which is according to piety*, namely ecclesiastical doctrine. This piety is through the worship of God. Titus 1:1: *according to the knowledge of the truth, which is according to piety*. The root of error, however, is twofold, namely the disposition of pride, and defect of intellect. As to the first he says *proud*. Now pride is called the root of errors in two ways: first because the proud wish to meddle with things they cannot attain to, and therefore it is necessary that they err and fail. Isa. 16:6: *his pride, and his arrogance, and his indignation are more than his strength*, etc. Also because they are unwilling to subject their understanding to another, but rely on their own prudence, and therefore are unwilling to obey sacred Scripture. Against this it is said, Prov. 3:5: *do not rely on your own prudence*. Prov. 11:2: *where there is humility, there is wisdom*. Also, defect of intellect. Here it must be known that just as in the body health is a certain equality of humors, so truth is a certain equality in the intellect, because truth is the adequation of thing and intellect. Hence just as one who is weak, when he does not have equality of constitution, is harmed by slight contrary accidents, so in the intellect, when a man is not founded in truth, nor has the power by which he can judge truth, he falls into error from any difficulty of a question whatsoever. Hence he says *sick about questions*, etc. Wisd. 9:5: *man is weak and of short time, and of lesser understanding of judgment and of laws*. As Boethius says, *the intellect is related to reason as the circle is to the center*. For reason proceeds discursively, considering the acts and defects and relation of one thing to another. And unless it resolves as far as the understanding of truth, reason is vain. Hence when it grasps the truth of a thing, it has it as it were as a center. But some proceed discursively and do not attain it. 2 Tim. 3:7: *always learning, and never coming to the knowledge of the truth*. And therefore he says *about questions*, that is, not arriving at the very center. And he says *questions*, etc., because in some matters doubt arises on the part of the thing, in others on the part of words and names. And therefore he says *questions*, as to the first, namely concerning things. Above, 1:4: *which questions promote rather than the edification of God, which is in faith*. As to the second he says *fights of words*. Prov. 19:8: *he who pursues only words will have nothing*. And he says *fights of words*, which is understood when a dissension arises from words alone. Because the Lord says, Jn. 8:36: *if the son shall make you free, you will truly be free*, and Matt. 17:25: *therefore the sons are free*, if from this some wished to infer that all Catholics, just as they are sons of God, so also would be free, it would be a fight of words, because the Lord there speaks of spiritual liberty, not carnal. Then, when he says *from which*, etc., he sets down the effect of error. And first he sets down the effect itself; second he clarifies certain things he had said, there, *but it is gain*. Again, first he shows what evils follow from false doctrine; second, in whom, there, *of men corrupted in mind*. Among the evils which he sets down, some are within, in the heart, some are external. Internal are the disordered movements with respect to good, or with respect to evil. With respect to good is envy, which is sadness at another's good; hence he says *envies*, which can be understood either in the matter at hand, or universally, because when some labor not for the truth but only for words, they do not bear it with equanimity if someone prevails. Job 5:2: *envy slays the little one*. Also in the matter at hand, because if servants are held as free and not subject, masters will envy and grieve that servants are made equal to them. Now from envy a man rises up against the neighbor whom he envies. And this is contention. Prov. 20:3: *it is an honor for a man to separate himself from contentions*. Or he rises up against God, and this is blasphemy. 2 Pet. 2:12: *blaspheming what they do not know*, etc. With respect to evil, however, is suspicion; hence he says *evil suspicions*, namely of masters against Christians, as though we had feigned liberty for gain, or that the whole of Christian doctrine had been invented only so that servants might become free. Ecclus. 3:26: *the suspicion of them has supplanted many, and has held their minds in vanity*. And from these follow conflicts against the faithful. Gen. 13:7: *there arose a quarrel between the herdsmen of Abraham's flocks and Lot's*. But this is not in the hearts of all, but of some. And he sets down three conditions of these, of which the first pertains to a defect of natural light, the second to a defect of knowledge, the third to a vice of disordered affection. As to the first he says *of men corrupted in mind*, that is, even in natural reason, who have a perverse judgment. Ps. 13:1: *they are corrupted, and have become abominable*. As to the second he says *deprived of the truth*, namely of the knowledge of it. Hos. 4:1: *there is no truth, and there is no mercy, and there is no knowledge of God in the land*. As to the third he says *esteeming gain to be piety*, that is, that the worship of God is ordered toward gain and the acquisition of riches. Wisd. 15:12: *they have esteemed our life to be a game, and our manner of living to be arranged for profit, and that one ought to acquire even from evil, from whatever source*. Men of this kind, therefore, who believe this, easily despise and fall into the aforesaid evils. Then, when he says *but it is*, he finally declares what he had said, namely that gain is piety. And first he shows how piety is related to gain; second he shows that it does not consist in the gain of external riches, there, *for those who wish*. Again, first he shows the first point; second he assigns the reason, there, *for we brought nothing*. He says therefore: those men say that gain is piety; but I say that piety is gain; therefore he adds *with sufficiency*, but of those riches which give sufficiency. And this consists in two things. In one principally, namely piety, which orders other things to God and neighbor, and these are the virtues and gifts of grace. Wisd. 7:14: *for it is an infinite treasure to men, which they who have used, have been made partakers of the friendship of God*. Second, in the sustenance of life; hence he says *with sufficiency*, that is, in those things which are necessary for life. Matt. 6:33: *seek first the kingdom of God and his justice*, etc. Above, 4:8: *piety is useful for all things*. Then, when he says *for we brought nothing*, etc., he assigns the reason for this. And first from the human condition; second from its necessity, there, *having*. Now he sets down the condition as to two things, namely as to the beginning, because *we brought nothing into this world*, etc.; as if to say: necessity suffices, superfluity is not expedient, because *we brought nothing into this world*. Job 1:21: *naked I came forth from my mother's womb*. Also as to the end, because *we shall carry nothing away*. Ps. 75:5: *they have slept their sleep, and all the men of riches have found nothing in their hands*. Job 27:19: *the rich man, when he shall sleep, shall carry nothing with him; he shall open his eyes, and shall find nothing*. Eccle. 5:15: *as he came, so shall he return*. As to necessity he says *having food, and with which we may be covered*, because goods exist on account of necessity, which man needs against what is consumed internally, and these are food; or against what is corrupted externally, and thus man needs the coverings of clothing and houses. Heb. ult.: *let your manner of life be without avarice, content with what is present*. Ecclus. 29:28: *the beginning of the life of man is water and bread, and clothing, and a house protecting shame*.”

“Above the Apostle showed what gain is expedient for Christians, namely piety with sufficiency; here he shows that those who seek a superfluous gain of riches incur many losses. And first he shows the evils that follow from an inordinate appetite for riches; second he assigns the reason, at the place "for the root..." But the evils that follow are twofold: for some arise from an outward enemy, but some from inward concupiscence, at the place "desires..." He says therefore: let us be content with food, etc.; because those who wish to become rich, not for necessity, but for abundance of riches, fall, etc. Ecclesiasticus 10:10: "Nothing is more wicked than to love money." Ecclesiastes 5:9: "He who loves riches shall not take fruit from them." And he sets down two things, namely temptations, and a snare, because first they tempt, inasmuch as riches allure, and lead to certain sins. 1 Thessalonians 3:5: "lest perhaps he who tempts should have tempted you, etc." 1 Corinthians 10:13: "Let no temptation take hold of you but such as is human." And they entangle with a snare, because riches are, to those who do not have them, unto temptation, and to those who have them, unto a snare, because they do not willingly give back what they take away. Proverbs 21:6: "He who gathers treasures with a lying tongue is vain and foolish." On the interior side he sets down three evils. First, that he falls into many desires. For the perfection of man is that his heart be gathered into one, because the more something is one, the more like it is to God, who is truly one. Psalm 26:4: "One thing I have asked of the Lord, etc." But he who seeks riches suffers against this, because his heart is drawn to diverse things. Hosea 10:2: "Their heart is divided, now they shall perish." And this is so, because Matthew 6:21: "where your treasure is, etc." Likewise, desires of this kind are useless in many ways. First, because they are useless spiritually, since riches do not lead to beatitude. Wisdom 5:8: "What has pride profited us? Or what has the boasting of riches conferred on us? etc." Ecclesiastes 5:9: "He who loves riches shall not take fruit from them." Likewise temporally, because they do not give what they promise. Ecclesiastes 6:1 and following: "There is another evil, which I have seen under the sun, and indeed frequent among men: a man to whom God has given riches, and substance, and honor, and nothing is lacking to his soul of all that he desires, yet God does not give him power to eat of it, but a stranger will devour it, etc." Third, they are harmful. Ecclesiastes 5:12: "Riches kept to the hurt of their owner." And he shows how they are harmful, because they plunge into destruction, namely in the present. On account of riches many have perished. Likewise in the future; hence he says "and perdition." Acts 8:20: "May your money be with you unto perdition." Or both are referred to spiritual damage. "Destruction," that is, eternal death. Romans 9:22: "He endured with much patience vessels of wrath fit for destruction, etc." And "perdition," that is, eternal punishment, which is called perdition on account of the punishment of loss, because they are as it were lost, the damned, since they cannot return to their home, namely of eternity. Job 21:30: "The wicked man is kept unto the day of destruction, and he shall be led to the day of wrath." Then when he says "root," etc., the reason for this is shown, and this from two things, namely from the nature of cupidity, and from experience, at the place "which some," etc. He says therefore: "they fall into temptation, etc." Why? Because "the root of all evils is cupidity." Here it is to be noted that according to some, cupidity is taken in three ways. Sometimes for avarice, insofar as it is a special sin, namely an inordinate love of having riches. Sometimes as it is a genus of all sins, insofar as it implies an inordinate appetite for a temporal thing, and this is included in every sin, because sin is a turning toward a changeable good. But in this sense it is not a root, but a genus of all. In a third way, insofar as it is a certain disorder of the mind toward desiring temporal goods inordinately, and this is only a habitual sin, and not in act, but it is a certain root of all sins. And cupidity is called "root," and pride "beginning." Ecclesiasticus 10:15: "The beginning of all sin is pride," because pride denotes a corruption of the mind toward withdrawing from God. But a tree has nourishment from the root, and thus sin takes its nourishment from cupidity on the part of the turning toward a changeable good. But I believe that he is speaking of cupidity insofar as it is a special sin, hence he says: "those who wish to become rich, etc." And this is the inordinate love of money. And therefore I say that avarice is the root of all. For all sins consist in appetite, and therefore the origin of sins is according to the origin of the things appetible. For the origin of appetible things proceeds from the end. And therefore the more a sin has an end that is more desirable, the worse it is. But the end of some sin is desirable on account of two things: namely, on account of itself, and this is excellence, because for this reason man wills that good, that he may excel. And this is pride, and therefore pride is the beginning of all sins. Likewise on account of something else, and this is that which avails for all things, and riches are of this kind, because through this men believe themselves to have all things. From this side, avarice is "the root of all evils." Then when he says "which some," he shows the same through experience. And he says "desiring," because the more riches are had, the more they are desired. Ecclesiasticus 5:9: "The greedy man shall not be filled with money." And they fall first into spiritual harm. Hence he says "they have erred from the faith." The reason for this is that through sound doctrine of the faith many illicit gains are prohibited, from which they are unwilling to desist, and they find for themselves another doctrine, where there might be hope of salvation for them. And this usurers do especially. Second, because "they have entangled themselves in many sorrows," even in the present, because there is anxiety in acquiring, fear in possessing, sorrow in losing. Job 20:22: "When he shall be satisfied with riches, he shall be straitened, he shall burn, and every sorrow shall rush upon him." And much more shall they grieve in the future. Then when he says "but you," he admonishes to follow sound doctrine, and to avoid the bad. And first he sets forth the way that he should follow; second he binds him by the introduction of a precept, at the place "I charge." Likewise, first he exhorts him to avoid the aforesaid sins; second he shows what he should do, at the place "but pursue." And because a servant ought to imitate his lord, since, as it is said in Ecclesiasticus 10:2: "As the judge of the people is, so also are his ministers," therefore he says: "O man of God"; as if he were to say: you are given over to the service of God. Psalm 115:6: "I am your servant." 1 John 2:6: "He who says he abides in him ought himself also to walk just as he walked." If therefore you are a man of God, you ought to do as Christ did, who, as is found in John 6:15, fled when they wished to make him king. Hebrews 12:2: "who, joy being set before him, endured the cross, despising the shame." Therefore you also "flee these things." Psalm 54:7: "I have gone far off flying away, and I remained in the wilderness." What then shall he do? He exhorts to two things: first, namely, to pursuing spiritual arms; second, to fighting in them, at the place "fight the good." But spiritual arms are either for doing good, or for enduring evil. The first, however, is either in relation to the neighbor, to whom we are ordered through two things, namely through justice and piety or mercy, because the first without the second is severity; the second without the first is remission. As to the first he says "pursue justice," which befits prelates. Wisdom 1:1: "Love justice, you who judge the earth." Likewise as to the second he says "piety," that is, mercy. Proverbs 20:28: "Mercy and justice preserve the king, and his throne is strengthened by clemency." But in relation to God, the first is that which perfects the intellect, namely faith. Hebrews 11:6: "Without faith it is impossible to please God, etc." The second, which perfects the affection, is charity. 1 John 4:16: "He who abides in charity abides in God, and God in him." For enduring evils there are two virtues, namely patience and meekness, because man in evil incurs two inordinate passions, namely inordinate sorrow, and anger which arises from it. And therefore patience is against immoderate sorrow. Luke 21:19: "In your patience you shall possess your souls." And meekness is against anger. Then he leads him to the due combat. And first he shows how he should fight; second he introduces the reason. He says therefore "fight the good fight," namely by the example of soldiers, who fight in two ways: namely, sometimes to defend what they have, sometimes to acquire what they do not have; and this is imminent for the saints. The first, that they may guard what they have, namely faith and the virtues; and therefore he says "of the faith," that is, for guarding the faith. Ecclesiasticus 4:33: "Fight even unto death for justice, etc." Or "of the faith," that through faith you may avoid sins. 1 John, last chapter: "This is the victory which overcomes the world, our faith." Or "of the faith," that is, that you may convert others to it. And he says "good," that is, a lawful fight. 1 Corinthians 9:25: "Everyone who strives in the contest abstains from all things." It is good then when one abstains from all hindrances. 2 Timothy 4:7: "I have fought the good fight." Second, they fight to acquire what they do not have. And this is eternal life, which is acquired through combat. Matthew 11:12: "The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent bear it away." And therefore he says "lay hold of eternal life," namely, as one holding it, that by your combat you may conquer. Or, that you may fight the fight of faith. And with what reward? That you may lay hold of eternal life. 1 Corinthians 9:25: "But we an incorruptible, etc." Then when he says "unto which you are called," he sets down the reason for this saying, namely "lay hold," etc. And first he responds to an objection, as if he were to say: you say that I ought to lay hold; I would indeed wish to, but I cannot. Nay, you can, because it is owed to you by right, since you have been called to it by God, and by the King of that kingdom. And therefore you ought most of all to strive. 1 Peter 2:9: "He has called you out of darkness into his marvelous light." Second, he sets forth the obligation; as if he were to say: "fight the good fight," because you have given an oath of doing this, and therefore it is not lawful for you to resist. Hence he says "and confessed a good confession before many witnesses," that is, at your consecration you professed the good fight, when you were ordained bishop. 1 Corinthians 9:16: "For if I do not preach the gospel, etc.," up to "a dispensation has been entrusted to me." Or "a good confession," namely by preaching the faith, that you may keep it. Then when he says "I charge," he binds him to the aforesaid things by a precept, which he first sets down, and second manifests certain sayings, at the place "which in its own." But in the precept, first he introduces witnesses, second he commends the precept, third he shows how long he should keep the precept. He introduces as witnesses God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ. He says therefore: I have admonished you, but lest you believe that it is lawful to do otherwise, "I charge you," just as you ought to charge your subjects, "before God." He had introduced two things, namely "lay hold of life," and "you have confessed," etc., and therefore he introduces the author of life, "who gives life to all things." But he says "God," who is the whole Trinity, who is the author of life. Likewise he also introduces the man Christ, who confessed himself to be the Son of God, which is the good confession of our faith. Likewise he commends the commandment, because it is in itself just, and right, and irreproachable by others. Job 6:30: "You shall not find iniquity in my tongue." And for how long is it to be kept? "Until the coming of the Lord." The term "until" denotes the end of the intention, that is, that through observance of this commandment you order yourself toward the coming. Or until your death, because as you shall be at that time, such shall you be found then. Matthew 24:13: "He who shall persevere unto the end, etc."”

“Above, the Apostle, setting forth a precept to Timothy, commanded that he keep the aforesaid things until the coming of Christ, and therefore he here treats of the coming of Christ, concerning which he makes three things clear. First, that it will be at a fitting time; second, that it will be manifest; third, he shows the author of the coming. As to the first he says *whom he will show forth in his own times*. 2 Peter, last chapter: *there shall come in the last days scoffers in deception*, etc. And therefore he wishes to show that although the coming may seem to be delayed, nevertheless it will be shown forth in its own time. Ecclesiastes 3:1: *all things have their season*. Ecclesiastes 8:6: *for every business there is a time and opportunity*. The fitting time is the end of the world, because that time is the time of harvest, and of the gathering of the fruit. And therefore it is fitting that he come at the end. As to the second he says *he will show*, that is, he will make manifest. For although he is visible as to the flesh, yet his power is hidden; but then his divinity too will be manifest to the saints, while the reprobate will see only the glory of the flesh. But as to the third he says that God the Trinity will show him forth. And concerning this he does two things: first he describes the coming of Christ; second, breaking forth into his commendation, he praises him, at the place *to whom be honor*, etc. Likewise, concerning the first he does three things. First he describes the author of the coming from perfect operation; second, from singular power; third, from the incomprehensibility of nature. The first, when he says *blessed*. For beatitude is a perfect operation, which belongs to the supreme operative power, most excellently disposed. And this is our beatitude. But the beatitude of God is that by which he knows himself. For if he did not know himself, he would not be God. Blessed Gregory: *God, while he enjoys himself, is perfectly glorious*. And fittingly he says of the author of this coming that he is blessed, because the coming of Christ is for this, that he may lead us to beatitude. Tobit 13:20: *I shall be blessed if there shall be a remnant of my seed to see the brightness of Jerusalem*. As to the second he says *who alone is mighty*. Psalm 88:9: *thou art mighty, O Lord*, etc. But why does he say "alone"? Do not all things have power? Indeed, by participation, but God alone essentially of himself. Hence he says *King of kings, and Lord of lords*. Ambrose: *Lord is a name of power*, and king likewise. He therefore who has a lord and a king over him is subject to power, and such a one is not powerful of himself, but from another. If therefore Christ is *King of kings*, etc., it is necessary that he alone have power not from another, but that all have it from him. And a twofold power of God is designated: namely, the governing power of the world, when he says *King of kings*, as though named from governance. Proverbs 20:8: *the king who sits on the throne of judgment scatters away all evil with his look*. Likewise the power of creating, when he says *Lord of lords*. Psalm 99:3: *know that the Lord he is God, he made us*. Apocalypse 19:16: *and he had on his garment, and on his thigh, written: King of kings, and Lord of lords*. As to the third he says *who alone has immortality, and inhabits light inaccessible*. The incomprehensibility of God is evident from two things. First, because he transcends whatever in creatures is comprehensible; second, because this very fact, that God is, exceeds the comprehension of all. The first, when he says *alone*. For in every change there is a certain corruption, because everything that is changed, insofar as it is such, ceases to be such. That therefore is properly and truly incorruptible which is utterly immutable. But every creature, considered in itself, has some change, or mutability; God however is wholly immutable. But if any creature is immutable, this belongs to it from the gift of grace. And from this he shows that the nature of God transcends everything that is in created nature. Above, 1:17: *to the king of ages, immortal*, etc. As to the second he says *light*, etc. Light among sensible things is the principle of seeing; hence that by which anything is known, in whatever way, is called light. But each thing is known through its form, and according as it is in act. Hence, as much as it has of form and act, so much it has of light. Things, therefore, which are a certain act, but not pure act, are luminous, but are not light. But the divine essence, which is pure act, is light itself. John 1:8: *he was not the light*, etc. But God dwells with himself, and this light is inaccessible, that is, not visible to the eye of flesh, but intelligible. And yet no created intellect can approach him. It must be noted, however, that the intellect can approach the knowledge of some nature in two ways: namely, so as to know, and so as to comprehend. But it is impossible for the intellect to arrive at comprehending God, because thus it would know God as he is knowable; but God is perfectly knowable insofar as he has entity and light; but these are infinite, therefore he is infinitely knowable. But the power of the created intellect is finite. And therefore even the intellect of Christ does not comprehend God. But there is another way of knowing God, namely by attaining to him. And according to this, no created intellect, by its own natural powers, attains to knowing that which God is. And the reason for this is that no power can reach to anything higher than its own object, just as sight [cannot] know something higher. But the proper object of the intellect is that which a thing is; hence whatever surpasses that which a thing is exceeds the proportion of every intellect. But in God, being and his quiddity are not other than each other. How then is he knowable? Let us therefore approach to know him, here through grace, and in the future through glory. Psalm 33:6: *approach unto him, and be enlightened*. But how then does God inhabit light inaccessible? And in Psalm 96:2: *cloud and darkness are round about him*; Exodus 9: *Moses approached the darkness, in which God was*. Dionysius answers: *all darkness is inaccessible light*. It is therefore the same thing that here is called light, and there darkness; but it is darkness insofar as it is not seen, but light insofar as it is seen. But a thing is invisible in two ways. In one way on account of itself, as the opaque; in another way on account of its excess, as the sun to the eye of the owl. Thus certain things are not visible to us on account of the defect of their being, and certain things on account of their excess; and thus God is in a certain way inaccessible to us. *Whom no man has seen*. If this is understood of comprehension, then it is absolutely true, even of the Angels, because God alone comprehends himself. But if of the vision by which he is attained, then it is understood in three ways. In one way, no one has seen him with the bodily eye. In another way, according to essence, with the eye of the mind, no one living in the flesh has seen him, except Christ. Exodus 33:20: *man shall not see me and live*. In the third way, no one has seen what God is through himself. Matthew 11:27: *no one knows the Father*, etc. Matthew 16:17: *flesh and blood has not revealed it to thee*. Then he breaks forth into the praise of God, saying *to whom be honor*. And he sets down two things. The first pertains to the showing of reverence, saying *honor*, which is the showing of reverence. Malachi 1:6: *if I be a father, where is my honor*, etc. The second pertains to governance, when he says *everlasting dominion*.”