The first man was of the earth, earthly: the second man, from heaven, heavenly.

“As it has been clearly demonstrated that the Word, who existed in the beginning with God, by whom all things were made, who was also always present with mankind, was in these last days, according to the time appointed by the Father, united to His own workmanship, inasmuch as He became a man liable to suffering, [it follows] that every objection is set aside of those who say, "If our Lord was born at that time, Christ had therefore no previous existence." For I have shown that the Son of God did not then begin to exist, being with the Father from the beginning; but when He became incarnate, and was made man, He commenced afresh the long line of human beings, and furnished us, in a brief, comprehensive manner, with salvation; so that what we had lost in Adam-namely, to be according to the image and likeness of God-that we might recover in Christ Jesus.”

“In like manner (the heretic) will be refuted also with the word "man: " "The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven." Now, since the first was a man, how can there be a second, unless he is a man also? Or, else, if the second is "Lord," was the first "Lord" also? It is, however, quite enough for me, that in his Gospel he admits the Son of man to be both Christ and Man; so that he will not be able to deny Him (in this passage), in the "Adam" and the "man" (of the apostle).”

“The first decree commanded to increase and to multiply; the second enjoined continency. While the world is still rough and void, we are propagated by the fruitful begetting of numbers, and we increase to the enlargement of the human race. Now, when the world is filled and the earth supplied, they who can receive continency, living after the manner of eunuchs, are made eunuchs unto the kingdom. Nor does the Lord command this, but He exhorts it; nor does He impose the yoke of necessity, since the free choice of the will is left. But when He says that in His Father's house are many mansions, He points out the dwellings of the better habitation. Those better habitations you are seeking; cutting away the desires of the flesh, you obtain the reward of a greater grace in the heavenly home. All indeed who attain to the divine gift and inheritance by the sanctification of baptism, therein put off the old man by the grace of the saving layer, and, renewed by the Holy Spirit from the filth of the old contagion, are purged by a second nativity. But the greater holiness and truth of that repeated birth belongs to you, who have no longer any desires of the flesh and of the body. Only the things which belong to virtue and the Spirit have remained in you to glory. It is the apostle's word whom the Lord called His chosen vessel, whom God sent to proclaim the heavenly command: "The first man," says he, "is from the earth, of earth; the second man is from heaven. Such as is the earthy, such are they also who are earthy; and such as is the heavenly, such also are the heavenly. As we have borne the image of him who is earthy, let us also bear the image of Him who is heavenly." Virginity bears this image, integrity bears it, holiness bears it, and truth. Disciplines which are mindful of God bear it, retaining righteousness with religion, steadfast in faith, humble in fear, brave to all suffering, meek to sustain wrong, easy to show mercy, of one mind and one heart in fraternal peace.”

“The first man Adam was made a living soul, the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural, and afterwards that which is spiritual; and then he adds, The first man is of the earth, earthy, the second man is from heaven, heavenly. Rightly therefore is man the last, being as it were the consummation of the whole work, the cause of the world, for whose sake all things were made; the habitant, as it were, of all the elements, he lives among beasts, swims with fishes, soars above birds, converses with Angels, dwells upon the earth, and has his warfare in heaven, ploughs the sea, feeds upon air, tills the soil, is a voyager over the deep, a fisher in the floods, a fowler in the air, in heaven an heir even joint-heir with Christ.”

“Having said that "the natural was first," and "the spiritual afterward," he again states another difference, speaking of "the earthy" and "the heavenly." For the first difference was between the present life and that which is to come: but this between that before grace and that after grace. And he stated it with a view to the most excellent way of life, saying, (for to hinder men, as I said, from such confidence in the resurrection as would make them neglectful of their practice and of perfection, from this topic also again he renders them anxious and exhorts to virtue, saying,) "The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven:" calling the whole by the name of "man," and naming the one from the better, and the other from the worst part.”

“First comes in the natural body such as Adam was the first man to possess. Had he not sinned, he would never have died. Such a body we too possess, except that its nature as a result of sin has become so changed for the worse that it is now faced with inexorable death. Such a body Christ also deigned to assume for our sakes, not indeed by necessity but in virtue of his power. Afterward, however, comes the spiritual body such as that which Christ, our head, was the first to have been, but which we, his members, will have at the final resurrection of the dead.”

“Here the Apostle shows by argument the difference of quality between dying bodies and rising bodies, which he had shown above by examples. Concerning this he does two things. For first he sets forth what he intends to prove; second he proves what he has set forth, at the place, as it is written, etc. He says therefore first: I said that what is sown animal shall rise spiritual, and, that this is true, namely that there is some spiritual body, I show, because if there is an animal body, there is also a spiritual one. And the Apostle does not intend to argue from this to his proposition, but he supposes this, intending to prove that very thing which he says, if there is a body, etc. Ecclus. XXXIII, 15: consider all the works of the Most High, two and two, one against one. As it is written, etc. Here he proves the proposition. His proof is this: there are two principles of the human race; one according to the life of nature, namely Adam, the other according to the life of grace, namely Christ; but animality is derived into all men from the first principle, namely Adam; therefore it is clear that much more from the second principle, namely Christ, spirituality will be derived into all men. Of this argument, first, he proves the first diversity of the principles, second the middle, namely the determination of the likeness from each of the principles, at the place, such as the earthy, etc. Concerning the first he does three things. First he shows the difference of the principles; second the order of the principles to one another, at the place, but that is not first which is spiritual, etc.; third he assigns the order of the argument, at the place, the first, etc. He sets down, therefore, first, the condition of the first principle according to the life of nature, taking the authority of Gen. II, 7. Whence he says, as it is written: the first man Adam was made, by God, into a living soul, namely with animal life, such as the soul can give, when, namely, the Lord breathed into his face the breath of life, Gen. II, 7. For the human form is called both soul and spirit. For insofar as it is directed to the care of the body, namely by vegetating, nourishing and generating, thus it is called soul; but insofar as it is directed to knowledge, namely by understanding, willing and the like, thus it is called spirit. Whence when he says the first man Adam was made into a living soul, the Apostle here means the life by which the soul serves about the body, not the Holy Spirit, as some imagine, because of the fact that it precedes and he breathed into his face the breath of life, saying this is the Holy Spirit. Second he sets down the condition of the second principle, saying but the last Adam, that is, Christ. And he is called last, because Adam brought in one state, namely of guilt, but Christ that of glory and life. Whence since after this state no other follows in this life, therefore he is called last. Is. LIII, 2 f.: we have desired him despised and the last of men. And elsewhere, namely Apoc. I, 17: I am the first and the last. And elsewhere: I am alpha and omega, etc. But he says Adam, because he was made from the nature of Adam into a living spirit. And from this, the conditions of the principles having been seen, their diversity appears, because the first man was made into a soul, the last into a spirit. But the former into a living soul only, the latter however into a living and life-giving spirit. The reason of which is: because, just as Adam obtained the perfection of his being through the soul, so also Christ obtained the perfection of his being, insofar as he is man, through the Holy Spirit. And therefore since the soul cannot give life except to its own body, therefore Adam was made into a soul, not life-giving, but only living; but Christ was made into a living and life-giving spirit, and therefore Christ had the power of giving life. Jn. I, 16: of his fullness, etc., and Jn. X, 10: I have come that they may have life and have it more abundantly. And in the creed: and in the Holy Spirit, the giver of life. But lest someone should say: if Christ was made into a life-giving spirit, why is he called last? Therefore, consequently, when he says but that is not first, etc., he shows the order of the principles. For we see in nature that in one and the same thing, the imperfect is prior to the perfect. Whence since spirituality stands to animality as the perfect to the imperfect, therefore in human nature the spiritual, which is perfect, ought not to be first, but, that order may be preserved, the imperfect ought to be first, namely that which is animal, then the perfect, namely that which is spiritual. Above ch. XIII, 10: when that which is perfect has come, etc. As Augustine says, a sign of this is that firstborn sons of old were accustomed to be animal, as Cain was born before Abel, Ishmael before Isaac, and Esau before Jacob. He assigns the reason of the said diversity, saying the first man, etc., as if he were to say: truly the first man was made into a living soul, because from the earth, Gen. II, 7: the Lord formed man from the slime of the earth, and therefore he is said to be earthy, that is, animal; the second man, namely Christ, was made into a life-giving spirit, because from heaven; because the divine nature which was united to this nature, is from heaven. And therefore he ought to be heavenly, that is, he ought to have such perfection as befits one coming from heaven, namely spiritual perfection. Jn. III, 31: he who comes from heaven is above all. But he says the first man is from the earth, according to the manner of speaking, by which things are said to be of that from which the first part is in their coming to be, just as a knife is said to be of iron because the first part from which the knife comes is iron. And because the first part from which Adam was made, is earth, therefore he is said to be from the earth. The second man is said to be from heaven, not because he brought his body from heaven, since he took it from the earth, namely from the body of the blessed virgin, but because the divinity (which is united to human nature) came from heaven, which was prior to the body of Christ. Thus, therefore, the diversity of the principles is clear, which was the major proposition of the principal argument. Consequently when he says such as the earthy, etc., he shows the derivation of the likeness of these principles from each, and first in common, second he divides it through its parts, at the place, therefore as we have borne, etc. He says therefore such as the earthy, etc., as if he were to say: the first man, because he was earthy and mortal, therefore it was derived that all should be both earthy and mortal. Above the same v. 22: and as in Adam all die. Zach. XIII, 5: Adam is my example, etc. But because the second man was heavenly, that is, spiritual and immortal, therefore we shall all be both immortal and spiritual. Rom. VI, 5: but we have been made complanted in the likeness, etc. Therefore as we have borne, etc. Here he concludes how in particular we ought to be conformed to the man, namely the heavenly one. Now we can be conformed to the heavenly one in two ways, namely in the life of grace and of glory, and one is the way to the other: because without the life of grace one does not arrive at the life of glory. And therefore he says as we have borne, etc., that is, as long as we were sinners, in us was the likeness of Adam. II Reg. VII, 19: this is the law of Adam, Lord God, etc. That therefore we may be able to be heavenly, that is, to arrive at the life of glory, let us bear the image of the heavenly one, through the life of grace. Col. III, 9 f.: putting off the old man, put on the new man, namely Christ. Rom. VIII, 29: whom he foreknew and predestined to be conformed, etc. Thus therefore we ought to be conformed to the heavenly one in the life of grace, because otherwise we shall not arrive at the life of glory. And this is what he says but this I say, brothers, as if he were to say: unless you live, namely the life of grace, you will not be able to arrive at the kingdom of God, namely the life of glory, because flesh and blood shall not possess the kingdom of God. This indeed is not to be understood, as certain heretics say, that flesh and blood will not rise according to substance, but that the whole body will be turned either into spirit, or into air: which is heretical and false; for the Apostle says that he will conform our body to the body of his glory. Whence since Christ after the resurrection had flesh and blood, as is said Lk. last: handle and see, because a spirit does not have flesh and bones, etc., it is clear that we too in the resurrection shall have flesh and blood. Flesh and blood is not to be understood, that is, the substance of flesh and blood, shall not possess the kingdom of God, but flesh and blood, that is, those giving effort to flesh and blood, namely men given over to vices and pleasures, shall not possess the kingdom of God. And thus flesh is taken, that is, man living carnally, Rom. VIII, 9: but you are not in the flesh, etc. Or: flesh and blood, that is, the works of flesh and blood shall not possess the kingdom of God, which is against the Jews and Saracens, who imagine that after the resurrection they will have wives, rivers of honey and milk. Or: flesh and blood, that is, the corruption of flesh and blood, shall not possess the kingdom of God, that is, after the resurrection, the body will not be subjected to the corruption of flesh and blood, according to which man lives. Whence, and according to this, he adds neither shall corruption possess incorruption, that is, neither shall the corruption of mortality, which is expressed here by the name of flesh, possess incorruption, that is, the incorruptible kingdom of God, because we shall rise in glory. Rom. VIII, 21: the creature itself shall be freed from the bondage of corruption, etc.”

“The first man is of the earthy earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven . The Vulgate reading here is “ the second man is of heaven, heavenly.” This was corrupted into “the second man is the Lord from heaven ” by Marcion, as Tertullian proves {contra Marcionem i lib. L c. 5). The Latin rendering, therefore, is the more genuine. Valentinus and the Gnostics gathered from this passage that Christ had not a material and human body, but that He brought from heaven a heavenly one, and passed through the Blessed Virgin, not as her child, but as rain-water passes through a pipe. This is a heresy long ago condemned, as S. Augustine testifies {Hares, n), and Irenaeus {lib. i. c. 5), and Tertullian {de Came Christie c. viii.). 1. Bede rightly says : “ Christ is called heavenly , because He led a heavenly life and was always without sin ; Adam is called earthy because he was subject to sin.” Hence there follows : “ As is the earthy,” &c. 2. Christ is called heavenly because He was conceived and bom of the Virgin by the heavenly power of the Holy Spirit, above the ordinary course of nature. S. Ambrose, S. Hilary {de Trin . lib. i.), S. Augustine {Dial, ad Orosium , qu. 4). 3. Christ is called heavenly by reason of His Divine and heavenly substance. In the same way He is called the Son of man, i.e., the Man who came down from heaven (S. John iii. 13). See Gregory of Nazianzen {Oral. 51) and Augustine {Ep. 57 ad Dardanum). 4. The most natural sense in which Christ is called “ heavenly ” is that He is glorious and incorruptible, like the inhabitants of heaven. This celestial glory Christ had substantially in His soul from the moment of His conception. He had it, too, in His body, because THE HEAVENLY BODY 395 it was His due, and was natural to His body ; but its manifestation was suspended and postponed, on account of His Passion, in order that He might assume it in His resurrection. Yet even before His death, Christ now and then assumed this glory, or the four gifts of the glorified body, viz., brightness in His transfiguration, agility when He walked on the sea, subtilty when He penetrated the womb of His mother, impassibility in the Eucharist. On the other hand, Adam is called “ earthy ” because he was formed from the earth, and hence and from sin contracted mortality, and the other qualities of an earthly, animal, mortal, and corruptible body. So S. Chrysostom, Augustine {de Civ . Dei, lib. xiii. c. 23), Tertullian {de Resurr. c. 49) ; for the Apostle is speaking here of the resurrection, and the glory of the bodies of the blessed, the pattern of which is the glorified body of Christ, and hence he calls Christ heavenly, and His body heavenly also”

“Now this I say, brethren,.... Upon the whole, I assert this, and observe it to you, out of a truly Christian respect for you, as brethren in the Lord, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God: this shows the necessity there is of a difference between the body that now is, and that which shall be, which the apostle has so largely insisted on, and so clearly proved and explained, in the preceding verses; because the body, as it now is, is not capable of possessing the heavenly glory; was it to be introduced into heaven, in the condition it is now, it would break in pieces, and crumble into dust; it would not be able to bear the glory of that state and place: by flesh and blood is meant, not human nature as to the substance of it, or as consisting of flesh and blood, for that can and does inherit the kingdom of God; witness the human nature, or body of Christ, the bodies of the saints that rose after his resurrection, and those of Enoch and Elijah, who were translated body and soul to heaven; so that this passage makes nothing for those that deny the resurrection of the same body, and plead for a new and an aerial one: but the human nature, or body, so and so qualified, is here meant; either as corrupted with sin, for without holiness and righteousness no man shall see the Lord, or enter into and possess the kingdom of heaven; or flesh and blood, or an human body, as it is now supported in this animal life, with meat and drink, &c. and as it is frail and mortal, and subject to death, in which sense the phrase is used in Scripture; see Mat 16:17 and often by the Jews; so Abraham is represented by them as saying (i), "I am , "flesh and blood", tomorrow I shall depart out of the world, or die:'' it would be endless to give the many instances that might be produced of this use of the phrase with them, and in which sense it is to be taken here: and the meaning is, that saints in their frail mortal bodies, such as they now are, are not capable of enjoying the heavenly glory; which is called "the kingdom", because of its riches, glory, grandeur, and magnificence; and the kingdom "of God", because it is of his preparing and giving; and what he calls his people to, and makes them meet for, and in which they will reign with him for evermore: heirs of it they may be, and are now whilst in this frail and mortal state; but inherit, possess, and enjoy it, they cannot, as not without holiness of soul, so not without immortality of body; and therefore it is necessary that the body should rise different in qualities from, though the same in substance with, the present body; that it should rise incorruptible, glorious, powerful, and spiritual; that it may be fitted for, and be able to bear the exceeding weight of glory in the other world: neither doth corruption inherit incorruption: by corruption is not so much meant sin, or the corruption of nature, or man as corrupted by sin, though it is true of such an one, that he does not, and cannot inherit incorruption; the incorruptible crown, the crown of glory that fadeth not away, the incorruptible inheritance, reserved in the heavens, those riches which moth and rust corrupt not; but the body, as it is generated in corruption, is supported by corruptible things, and is subject to corruption and worms; in such a situation it is unfit for, and incapable of inheriting eternal glory; it must be different from what it is; it must put on immortality, and be clothed with incorruption: the word inherit in both clauses shows, that the heavenly glory is an inheritance, and belongs to children only; is their heavenly Father's bequest unto them; is not bought or acquired by anything of theirs; and is what they enter into and upon, in virtue and consequence of the death of the testator, Christ. (i) Bemibdar Rabba, sect. 11. fol. 202. 3.”

“The first man is of the earth - That is: Adam's body was made out of the dust of the earth; and hence the apostle says he was χοΐκος, of the dust; for the body was made עפר מן האדמה aphar min haadamah, dust from the ground; Gen 2:7. The second man is - from heaven - Heavenly, ουρανιος, as several good MSS. and versions read. The resurrection body shall be of a heavenly nature, and not subject to decay or death. What is formed of earth must live after an earthly manner; must be nourished and supported by the earth: what is from heaven is of a spiritual nature; and shall have no farther connection with, nor dependence upon, earth. I conceive both these clauses to relate to man; and to point out the difference between the animal body and the spiritual body, or between the bodies which we now have and the bodies which we shall have in the resurrection. But can this be the meaning of the clause, the second man is the Lord from heaven? In the quotation I have omitted ὁ Κυριος, the Lord, on the following authorities: Manuscripts - BCD*EFG, and two others. Versions - Coptic, Ethiopic, Armenian in the margin, Vulgate, and Itala. Fathers-Origen, who quotes it once and omits it once; Athanasius, Basil, the two Gregories, Nyssen and Nazianzen; Isidore, Cyril, Tertullian, Cyprian, Hilary, Zeno, Ambrose, Augustine, Jerome, Ambrosiaster, Philaster, Leo, Pacianus, Primasius, Sedulius, Bede, and others. See these authorities more at large in Wetstein. Some of the most eminent of modern critics leave out the word, and Tertullian says that it was put in by the heretic Marcion. I do think that the word is not legitimate in this place. The verse is read by the MSS., versions, and fathers referred to, thus: The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is of heaven, heavenly; Κυριος being omitted and ουρανιος added. The first man and the second man of this verse are the same as the first Adam and the second Adam of Co1 15:45, and it is not clear that Christ is meant in either place. Some suppose that there is a reference here to what Eve said when she brought forth Cain: I have gotten a man from the Lord, קניתי איש את יהוה kanithi ish eth Yehovah, I have possessed or obtained a man, the Lord; that is, as Dr. Lightfoot explains it, that the Lord himself should become man: and he thinks that Eve had respect to the promise of Christ when she named her son; as Adam had when he named his wife. If Eve had this in view, we can only say she was sadly mistaken: indeed the conjecture is too refined. The terms first man of the earth, and second man from heaven, are frequent among the Jews: אדם לעילא the superior Adam; and אדם תתאה Adam the inferior; that is, the earthly and the heavenly Adam: Adam before the resurrection, and Adam after it.”

“of the earth--inasmuch as being sprung from the earth, he is "earthy" (Gen 2:7; Gen 3:19, "dust thou art"); that is, not merely earthly or born upon the earth, but terrene, or of earth; literally, "of heaped earth" or clay. "Adam" means red earth. the Lord--omitted in the oldest manuscripts and versions. from heaven-- (Joh 3:13, Joh 3:31). Humanity in Christ is generic. In Him man is impersonated in his true ideal as God originally designed him. Christ is the representative man, the federal head of redeemed man.”