The interpretation timeline
1 Corinthians 4:21 Douay-Rheims

What will you? shall I come to you with a rod; or in charity, and in the spirit of meekness?

A.D. 215 – 1871 8 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
215
A.D.
c. A.D. 150–215
“See the care, and wisdom, and power of the Instructor: "He shall not judge according to opinion, nor according to report; but He shall dispense judgment to the humble, and reprove the sinners of the earth." And by David: "The Lord instructing, hath instructed me, and not given me over to death." For to be chastised of the Lord, and instructed, is deliverance from death. And by the same prophet He says: "Thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron." Thus also the apostle, in the Epistle to the Corinthians, being moved, says, "What will ye? Shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, in the spirit of meekness? " Also, "The Lord shall send the rod of strength out of Sion," He says by another prophet. And this same rod of instruction, "Thy rod and staff have comforted me," said some one else. Such is the power of the Instructor-sacred, soothing, saving.”
Source
397
A.D.
Ambrose of Milan Patristic
A.D. 339–397
“First he made mention of the rod, and like the almond rod struck those who were wandering, that he might afterwards comfort them in the spirit of meekness. And so meekness restored him whom the rod had deprived of the heavenly sacraments.”
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"What will ye? Shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of meekness?" There is much both of terror and of gentleness in this saying. For to say, "I will know," was the language of one as yet withholding himself: but to say, "What will ye? Must I come unto you with a rod?" are the words of one thenceforth ascending the teacher's seat, and from thence holding discourses with them and taking upon him all his authority. What means, "with a rod?" With punishment, with vengeance: that is, I will destroy; I will strike with blindness: the kind of thing which Peter did in the case of Sapphira, and himself in the case of Elymas the sorcerer. For henceforth he no longer speaks as bringing himself into a close comparison with the other teachers, but with authority. And in the second Epistle too he appears to say the same, when he writes, "Since ye seek a proof of Christ speaking in me." "Shall I come with a rod, or in love?" What then? to come with a rod, was it not an instance of love? Of love it was surely. But because through his great love he shrinks back in punishing, therefore he so expresses himself. Further; when he spoke about punishment, he said not, "in a spirit of meekness, but, [simply,] "with a rod:" and yet of that too the Spirit was author. For there is a spirit of meekness, and a spirit of severity. He doth not, however, choose so to call it, but from its milder aspect. And for a like reason also, God, although avenging Himself, has it often affirmed of Him that He is "gracious and long-suffering, and rich in mercy and pity:" but that He is apt to punish, once perhaps or twice, and sparingly, and that upon some urgent cause. Consider then the wisdom of Paul; holding the authority in his own hands, he leaves both his and that in the power of others, saying. "What will ye?" "The matter is at your disposal." For we too have depending on us both sides of the alternative; both falling into hell, and obtaining the kingdom: since God hath so willed it. For, "behold," saith he, "fire and water: whichever way thou wilt, thou mayest stretch forth thine hand." And, "If ye be willing, and will hearken unto me, ye shall eat the good of the land; but if ye be not willing, the sword shall devour you."”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“After the Apostle has reprimanded the Corinthians for this, that they judged the apostles rashly and presumptuously despised them, here he presses on toward their correction, and first by a word of admonition; second, by example, where he says I beg you therefore, brothers, etc.; third, by the scourge of correction, where he says as though I were not going to come, etc. Concerning the first he does three things. First he sets forth the manner of admonition, saying these things, namely what I have said to you thus far in the course of the epistle, I write not that I may confound you, namely with an evil confusion, which sends into despair, although I would wish you to be confounded with the confusion which avoids sin, according to that word of Ecclesiasticus 4:25: there is a confusion that brings sin, and there is a confusion that brings grace and glory. But I admonish you of the aforesaid things, as sons. Ecclesiastes 7:25: do you have sons? Instruct them, and take care of them from their childhood. Second he shows the fitting manner of admonishing, saying for although you should have ten thousand tutors in Christ, yet not many fathers. Here it must be considered that a father is one who first begets: but a tutor is one who nourishes and instructs one already born. Galatians 3:24: the law was our tutor in Christ. Therefore the Apostle says he is their father in Christ, because he first preached the Gospel to them. Hence, assigning the reason for what he had said, he adds for in Christ Jesus through the Gospel I have begotten you. Now generation is a process toward life, and man lives in Christ through faith. Galatians 2:20: but that I now live in the flesh, I live in the faith of the Son of God. But faith, as is said in Romans 10:17, is from hearing, and hearing through the word. Hence the word of God is the seed by which the Apostle begot them in Christ. Hence James 1:18: of his own will he begot us by the word of truth. But he calls others tutors, because after they had received the faith, these helped them: so that the same comparison is to be understood, as regards the preaching of the Gospel, of the tutor to the father, which was set out above in III, 6ff., as of the one who waters to the one who plants, and of the one who builds upon to the one who lays the foundation. Then, when he says I beg you therefore, brothers, he presses on to correct them by his own example. And first he exhorts them to imitate his example, saying: therefore since you are sons, since it belongs to good sons to imitate their fathers, I beg you, be imitators of me, namely that you may not judge rashly, just as I do not, because I do not presume to judge even myself, and that you may think humbly of yourselves, and more highly of others. Hence it was not without cause that he used this manner of speaking: we are weak, you are strong. 2 Thessalonians 3:9: that we might give ourselves as a pattern to you, for you to imitate. It must be noted, however, that those whom above he named sons, he now names brothers. But he had called them his sons in Christ, because he had begotten them not for himself, but for Christ, and because he himself had been begotten by Christ, he consequently had them as brothers and sons. Therefore they ought to imitate him as a father only insofar as he himself imitated Christ, who is the principal father of all. And by this, occasion is taken away from subjects of clinging to the bad examples of their superiors. Hence in this subjects ought to imitate their superiors only in that in which these superiors themselves imitate Christ, who is the infallible rule of truth; hence he set himself as an example to the apostles. John 13:15: I have given you an example, that as I have done, etc. Which example indeed Paul followed, according to that saying of Job 23:11: my foot has followed his steps, I have kept his way, and have not declined from it. Second he removes the excuse of ignorance, saying for this reason I have sent to you Timothy, who is my most dear and faithful son in the Lord, according to that saying of Philippians 2:20, speaking of Timothy: I have no one so like-minded, who is solicitous for you with sincere affection. Who will remind you of my ways, that is, who will teach you my proceedings, that is, all my works, and admonish you to follow them, according to that saying of Jeremiah 6:16: ask about the ancient paths, which is the good way, and walk in it. Which ways indeed are in Christ, and therefore you ought not to disdain to follow them, according to that saying of Psalm 24:4: show me your ways, O Lord. And let this not seem burdensome to you, because I impose this on all in common. Hence he adds as I teach everywhere in the Church. Colossians 1:5f: you have heard the gospel of truth, which has come to you, as also in the whole world. Or what he says my ways is to be referred to works, but what he says as also everywhere is to be referred to teachings. For to this end Timothy had been sent, that he might induce them to imitate his works, and to hold to the Apostle's teachings. Then, when he says as though I were not going to come to you, he threatens them with the scourge of correction. And first he shows that they are worthy of the scourge of correction, saying as though I were not going to come to you, some are puffed up, namely among you, as though not fearing to be convicted of their pride by me, and yet they are worthy of scourges: for the humble are corrected by words alone, but the proud need scourges, according to that saying of Job 40:7: look upon all the proud, and confound them. Second he foretells to them his coming, by which he will come to judge, where first he foretells the coming, saying but I will come to you quickly. And because it is said in Proverbs 16:9: the heart of man disposes his way, but it is the Lord's to direct his steps, therefore he adds if the Lord will. James 4:15: if the Lord will, and if we shall live, we will do this or that. Second he foretells to them his judicial knowledge, when he says and I will know, namely in judicial order, according to that saying of Job 29:16: the cause which I did not know, I investigated most diligently. Not the speech of those who are puffed up, but the power, as if to say: not on account of these things will those be approved by my examination who abound in words, but if they should abound in power; because, as is said in Proverbs 14:23, where words are very many, there is often poverty. Third he assigns the reason, saying for the kingdom of God is not in speech, but in power, that is, those who abound in speech do not for that reason belong to the kingdom of God, according to that saying of Matthew 7:21: not everyone who says to me: Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father. Lastly he threatens them with correction, reserving nevertheless the correction to their own choice, saying what do you want? Shall I come to you with a rod, namely of discipline, to chastise you, or in charity, that is, in a showing of love, and in a spirit of gentleness, so that I may do nothing harsher with you? For this depends on you; for if you remain in the way of folly, it is necessary for me to come to you with a rod, according to that saying of Proverbs 22:15: folly is bound up in the heart of a child, and the rod of discipline will drive it away. But if you correct yourselves, I will show you charity and gentleness, Galatians, last chapter: you who are spiritual, instruct such a one in the spirit of gentleness. But he does not say this as though, if coming with the rod, he would not come with charity, since it is written in Proverbs 13:24: he who spares the rod, hates his son; but he who loves him, instructs him diligently — but because he who is chastised with the rod does not always feel the sweetness of charity, as do those whom he consoles gently.”

Reformation

c. 1500 – 1650
1637
A.D.
1567–1637
“What will ye ? Shall I come unto you with a rod l Such as becomes the father I spoke of in ver. 15. The rod is a symbol of severity of rebuke and power of punishing. So Chrysostom, Theophylact, Anselm. Observe here the power of punishing lodged in the Church and her prelates, and exercised by Paul in the next chapter. CEcumenius and Cajetan refer these words of the Apostle's to the next chapter, in which he sternly rebukes the Corinthians for the incest of the fornicator. However, these words can well be joined with the preceding, in which he reproved the Corinthians for their pride. Digitized by v^,ooQle CHAPTER V I The incestuous person 6 is cause rather of shame unto them , than of rejoicing. 7 The old leaven is to be purged out. io Heinous offenders are to be shunned and avoided. I T is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife. 2 And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you. 3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, 4 In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 6 Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump ? 7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us : 8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators : io Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters ; for then must ye needs go out of the world. II But now I have written unto* you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner ; with such an one no not to eat 12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within ? 13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person. SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER L The Apostle proceeds from the schism of the Corinthians to deal with the scandal caused by incest among them : he blames them for allowing one living openly in incest to remain among them, and orders them to excommunicate him and hand him over to Satan. 9 * Digitized by v^,ooQle 9 2 FIRST EPISTLE TO THE ii. He bids them (ver. 6) purge out this and any other leaven of sin, in order that they may with purity celebrate the everlasting Passover, and so eat the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth, iil. He orders them (ver. 9) not to mingle with Christians that are open sinners; but as for heathens and unbelievers, he says that they are not under the jurisdiction of him or of the Church”
Source

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“What will ye?.... Or "how will ye, that I should come unto you?" as the Arabic and Ethiopic versions read it: since the apostle had determined upon his coming to them: and had made mention of it, he puts it to them, in what manner they themselves would choose he should come unto them; shall I come unto you with a rod; either as a schoolmaster, as were their false teachers, with a "ferula"; or as a father with a rod of correction and chastisement, assuming his paternal authority, putting on severe looks, and using roughness; or rather as an apostle with the apostolical rod; by which is meant not excommunication, which is what belongs to a whole community, and not any single person; but a power of inflicting punishment on the bodies of delinquents, by smiting with diseases, and even with death itself; for as the prophets of the Old Testament had a power from God of inflicting diseases and death upon offenders; so had the apostles of the New, as appears from the instances of Ananias, and Sapphira, and Elymas the sorcerer: or in love, and in the spirit of meekness? with the affection of a father, with a pleasant countenance, and a meek spirit; in opposition to that roughness and sharpness, he had an authority, as an apostle of Christ, to use in proper cases; and therefore as the latter would be most eligible by them, his suggestion is, that they would behave accordingly, that there might be no occasion to come to them in the former manner, which was not desirable by him, There seems to be an allusion to a practice among the Jews, in the punishing of a drunkard or gluttonous person; the rule for which was this (w), "they first correct him "with words", or "with a rod", as it is written, Deu 21:18 and have chastened him; but if he adds and repeats (i.e. goes on in his sin), then they stone him.'' Or rather the allusion is to the judges in the sanhedrim, one of the instruments or ensigns of whose office was "a rod or staff" to smite with; it is said (x) of R. Hona, when he went to the sanhedrim, he used to say, bring me the instruments of the Tabernae (the place where the sanhedrim sat); what are they? "the staff" (in Cocceius's edition it is "the rods", and the sandals, the trumpets, and the thongs); the gloss is, "the thong" for scourging, "the staff" (or rods) for beating the rebellious until they return, the "trumpets" for excommunication, and the "sandals" for plucking off the shoe; things in which the judges of the court were concerned, and here the apostle proposes to come as judge; see Co1 5:3. (w) R. Elias in Adderet apud Trigland. de sect. Karaeor. c. 10. p. 161. (x) T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 7. 2. Next: 1 Corinthians Chapter 5”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love - Here he alludes to the case of the teacher and father, mentioned in Co1 4:15. Shall I come to you with the authority of a teacher, and use the rod of discipline? or shall I come in the tenderness of a father, and entreat you to do what I have authority to enforce? Among the Jews, those who did not amend, after being faithfully admonished, were whipped, either publicly or privately, in the synagogue. If on this they did not amend, they were liable to be stoned. We see, from the cases of Ananias and Sapphira, Elymas the sorcerer, Hymenaeus and Alexander, etc., that the apostles had sometimes the power to inflict the most awful punishments on transgressors. The Corinthians must have known this, and consequently have dreaded a visit from him in his apostolical authority. That there were many irregularities in this Church, which required both the presence and authority of the apostle, we shall see in the subsequent chapters. 1. In the preceding chapter we find the ministers of God compared to Stewards, of whom the strictest fidelity is required. (1.) Fidelity to God, in publishing his truth with zeal, defending it with courage, and recommending it with prudence. (2.) Fidelity to Christ, whose representatives they are, in honestly and fully recommending his grace and salvation on the ground of his passion and death, and preaching his maxims in all their force and purity. (3.) Fidelity to the Church, in taking heed to keep up a godly discipline, admitting none into it but those who have abandoned their sins; and permitting none to continue in it that do not continue to adorn the doctrine of God their Savior. (4.) Fidelity to their own Ministry, walking so as to bring no blame on the Gospel; avoiding the extremes of indolent tenderness on one hand, and austere severity on the other. Considering the flock, not as their flock, but the flock of Jesus Christ; watching, ruling, and feeding it according to the order of their Divine Master. 2. A minister of God should act with great caution: every man, properly speaking, is placed between the secret judgment of God and the public censure of men. He should do nothing rashly, that he may not justly incur the censure of men; and he should do nothing but in the loving fear of God, that he may not incur the censure of his Maker. The man who scarcely ever allows himself to be wrong, is one of whom it may be safely said, he is seldom right. It is possible for a man to mistake his own will for the will of God, and his own obstinacy for inflexible adherence to his duty. With such persons it is dangerous to have any commerce. Reader, pray to God to save thee from an inflated and self-sufficient mind. 3. Zeal for God's truth is essentially necessary for every minister; and prudence is not less so. They should be wisely tempered together, but this is not always the case. Zeal without prudence is like a flambeau in the hands of a blind man; it may enlighten and warm, but it play also destroy the spiritual building. Human prudence should be avoided as well as intemperate zeal; this kind of prudence consists in a man's being careful not to bring himself into trouble, and not to hazard his reputation, credit, interest, or fortune, in the performance of his duty. Evangelical wisdom consists in our suffering and losing all things, rather than be wanting in the discharge of our obligations. 4. From St. Paul's account of himself we find him often suffering the severest hardships in the prosecution of his duty. He had for his patrimony, hunger, thirst, nakedness, stripes, etc.; and wandered about testifying the Gospel of the grace of God, without even a cottage that he could claim as his own. Let those who dwell in their elegant houses, who profess to be apostolic in their order, and evangelic in their doctrines, think of this. In their state of affluence they should have extraordinary degrees of zeal, humility, meekness, and charity, to recommend them to our notice as apostolical men. If God, in the course of his providence, has saved them from an apostle's hardships, let them devote their lives to the service of that Church in which they have their emoluments; and labor incessantly to build it up on its most holy faith. Let them not be masters to govern with rigour and imperiousness; but tender fathers, who feel every member in the Church as their own child, and labor to feed the heavenly family with the mysteries of God, of which they are stewards. 5. And while the people require much of their spiritual pastors, these pastors have equal right to require much of their people. The obligation is not all on one side; those who watch for our souls have a right not only to their own support, but to our reverence and confidence. Those who despise their ecclesiastical rulers, will soon despise the Church of Christ itself, neglect its ordinances, lose sight of its doctrines, and at last neglect their own salvation.”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“with a rod, or in love--The Greek preposition is used in both clauses; must I come IN displeasure to exercise the rod, or IN love, and the Spirit of meekness (Isa 11:4; Co2 13:3)? Next: 1 Corinthians Chapter 5”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.