The interpretation timeline
1 Timothy 2:9 Douay-Rheims

In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire,

A.D. 215 – 1871 10 witnesses 16 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
215
A.D.
c. A.D. 150–215
“Nor are the women to smear their faces with the ensnaring devices of wily cunning. But let us show to them the decoration of sobriety. For, in the first place, the best beauty is that which is spiritual, as we have often pointed out. For when the soul is adorned by the Holy Spirit, and inspired with the radiant charms which proceed from Him,-righteousness, wisdom, fortitude, temperance, love of the good, modesty, than which no more blooming colour was ever seen,-then let coporeal beauty be cultivated too, symmetry of limbs and members, with a fair complexion. ... But it is monstrous for those who are made in "the image and likeness of God," to dishonour the archetype by assuming a foreign ornament, preferring the mischievous contrivance of man to the divine creation. The Instructor orders them to go forth "in becoming apparel, and adorn themselves with shamefacedness and sobriety," "subject to their own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives; while they behold," he says, "your chaste conversation. Whose adorning, let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; but let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price." For the labour of their own hands, above all, adds genuine beauty to women, exercising their bodies and adorning themselves by their own exertions; not bringing unornamental ornament wrought by others, which is vulgar and meretricious, but that of every good woman, supplied and woven by her own hands whenever she most requires. For it is never suitable for women whose lives are framed according to God, to appear arrayed in things bought from the market, but in their own home-made work. For a most beautiful thing is a thrifty wife, who clothes both herself and her husband with fair array of her own working; in which all are glad-the children on account of their mother, the husband on account of his wife, she on their account, and all in God.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“For what is a crown on the head of a woman, but beauty made seductive, but mark of utter wantonness,-a notable casting away of modesty, a setting temptation on fire? Therefore a woman, taking counsel from the apostles' foresight, will not too elaborately adorn herself, that she may not either be crowned with any exquisite arrangement of her hair.”
Source
“So far, however, as regards the dress of women, the variety of observance compels us-men of no consideration whatever-to treat, presumptuously indeed, after the most holy apostle, except in so far as it will not be presumptuously if we treat the subject in accordance with the apostle.”
258
A.D.
Cyprian Patristic
c. A.D. 200–258
“You call yourself wealthy and rich; but Paul meets your riches, and with his own voice prescribes for the moderating of your dress and ornament within a just limit. "Let women," said he, "adorn themselves with shamefacedness and sobriety, not with broidered hair, nor gold, nor pearls, nor costly array, but as becometh women professing chastity, with a good conversation." Also Peter consents to these same precepts, and says, "Let there be in the woman not the outward adorning of array, or gold, or apparel, but the adorning of the heart." But if these also warn us that the women who are accustomed to make an excuse for their dress by reference to their husband, should be restrained and limited by religious observance to the Church's discipline, how much more is it right that the virgin should keep that observance, who has no excuse for adorning herself, nor can the deceitfulness of her fault be laid upon another, but she herself remains in its guilt!”
Source
“That a woman ought not to be adorned in a worldly fashion. In the Apocalypse: "And there came one of the seven angels having vials, and approached me, saying, Come, I will show thee the condemnation of the great whore, who sitteth upon many waters, with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication. And I saw a woman who sate upon a beast. And that woman was clothed with a purple and scarlet robe; and she was adorned with gold, and precious stones, and pearls, holding a golden cup in her hand full of curses, and impurity, and fornication of the whole earth." Also to Timothy: "Let your women be such as adorn themselves with shamefacedness and modesty, not with twisted hair, nor with gold, nor with pearls, or precious garments, but as becometh women professing chastity, with a good conversation." Of this same thing in the Epistle of Peter to the people at Pontus: "Let there be in a woman not the outward adorning of ornament, or of gold, or of apparel, but the adorning of the heart." Also in Genesis: "Thamar covered herself with a cloak, and adorned herself; and when Judah beheld her, she appeared to him to be a harlot."”
Source
397
A.D.
Ambrose of Milan Patristic
A.D. 339–397
“In our prayers, too, modesty is most pleasing and gains us much grace from our God.… A noble thing, then, is modesty, which, though giving up its rights, seizing on nothing for itself, laying claim to nothing and in some ways somewhat retiring within the sphere of its own powers, yet is rich in the sight of God, in whose sight no one is rich. Richness is modesty, for it is the portion of God. Paul bids that prayer be offered up with modesty and sobriety. He desires that this should be first, and, as it were, lead the way of prayers to come, so that the sinner's prayer may not be boastful but veiled, as it were, with the blush of shame. Indeed, it may merit a far greater degree of grace, in giving way to modesty at the remembrance of its fault.”
Source
“Let us then hold fast modesty and that moderation which adds to the beauty of the whole of life. For it is no light thing in every matter to preserve due measure and to bring about order, wherein that is plainly conspicuous which we call "decorum," or what is seemly. This is so closely connected with what is virtuous that one cannot separate the two.… This seemliness which we offer to God we may believe to be far better than other things. It befits also a woman to pray in an orderly dress, but it is especially fitting to her to pray humbly covered and to pray giving promise of purity together with wholesome conversation.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“For what reason wilt thou be able to state, what defense, when the Master lays these pearls to thy charge, and brings the poor who have perished with hunger into the midst? On this account Paul said, "not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly raiment." For therein would be a snare. And if we were to enjoy them continually, yet we shall lay them aside with death. But arising out of virtue there is all security, and no vicissitude and changeableness, but here it makes us more secure, and also accompanies us there. Dost thou wish to possess pearls, and never to lay aside this wealth? Take off all ornament and place it in the hands of Christ through the poor. He will keep all thy wealth for thee, when He shall raise up thy body with much radiancy. Then He shall invest thee with better wealth and greater ornament, since this present is mean and absurd.”
Source
“And Paul again with him stands as an accuser, telling Timothy to charge the women, "not to adorn themselves with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array." So that everywhere the wearing of gold is hurtful, but especially when thou art entering into a church, when thou passest through the poor. For if thou weft exceedingly anxious to bring an accusation against thyself, thou couldest not put on any other array than this visage of cruelty and inhumanity.”
Source
“And if thou despise our judgments, hear the voice of Paul, with great earnestness forbidding these things, and then thou wilt perceive the absurdity of them. What then saith he? "Not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array." Of what favor then canst thou be worthy; when, in spite of Paul's prohibiting the married woman to have costly clothing, thou extendest this effeminacy even to thy shoes, and hast no end of contrivances for the sake of this ridicule and reproach? Yes: for first a ship is built, then rowers are mustered, and a man for the prow, and a helmsman, and a sail is spread, and an ocean traversed, and, leaving wife and children and country, the merchant commits his very life to the waves, and comes to the land of the barbarians, and undergoes innumerable dangers for these threads, that after it all thou mayest take them, and sew them into thy shoes, and ornament the leather. And what can be done worse than this folly?”
Source
“In like manner he says, I will that women approach God without wrath and doubting, lifting up holy hands: that they should not follow their own desires, nor be covetous or rapacious. For what if a woman does not rob or steal herself, but does it through means of her husband? Paul however requires something more of women, that they adorn themselves "in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broidered hair or gold or pearls or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works." But what is this "modest apparel"? Such attire as covers them completely, and decently, not with superfluous ornaments, for the one is becoming, the other is not. What? Dost thou approach God to pray, with broidered hair and ornaments of gold? Art thou come to a dance? to a marriage? to a gay procession? There such a broidery, such costly garments, had been seasonable, here not one of them is wanted. Thou art come to pray, to supplicate for pardon of thy sins, to plead for thine offenses, beseeching the Lord, and hoping to render Him propitious to thee. Why dost thou adorn thyself? This is not the dress of a suppliant. How canst thou groan? How canst thou weep? How pray with fervency, when thus attired? Shouldest thou weep, thy tears will be the ridicule of the beholders. She that weeps ought not to be wearing gold. It were but acting, and hypocrisy. For is it not acting to pour forth tears from a soul so overgrown with extravagance and ambition? Away with such hypocrisy! God is not mocked! This is the attire of actors and dancers, that live upon the stage. Nothing of this sort becomes a modest woman, who should be adorned "with shamefacedness and sobriety." Imitate not therefore the courtesans. For by such a dress they allure their many lovers; and hence many have incurred a disgraceful suspicion, and, instead of gaining any advantage from their ornaments, have injured many by bearing this character. For as the adulteress, though she may have a character for modesty, derives no benefit from that character, in the Day, when He who judges the secrets of men shall make all things manifest; so the modest woman, if she contrive by this dress to pass for an adulteress, will lose the advantage of her chastity. For many have suffered harm by this opinion. "What can I do," thou sayest, "if another suspects me?" But thou givest the occasion by thy dress, thy looks, thy gestures. It is for this reason that Paul discourses much of dress and much of modesty. And if he would remove those things which are only the indications of wealth, as gold, and pearls, and costly array; how much more those things which imply studied ornament, as painting, coloring the eyes, a mincing gait, the affected voice, a languishing and wanton look; the exquisite care in putting on the cloak and bodice, the nicely wrought girdle, and the closely-fitted shoes? For he glances at all these things, in speaking of "modest apparel" and "shamefacedness." For such things are shameless and indecent. But if these prohibitions are addressed to those who have husbands, who are rich, and live luxuriously; much more to those who have professed virginity. But what virgin, you say, wears gold, or broidered hair? Yet there may be such a studied nicety in a simple dress, as that these are nothing to it. You may study appearance in a common garment more than those who wear gold. For when a very dark colored robe is drawn closely round the breast with the girdle (as dancers on the stage are attired), with such nicety that it may neither spread into breadth nor shrink into scantiness, but be between both; and when the bosom is set off with many folds, is not this more alluring than any silken robes? and when the shoe, shining through its blackness, ends in a sharp point, and imitates the elegance of painting, so that even the breadth of the sole is scarce visible-or when, though you do not indeed paint the face, you spend much time and pains on washing it, and spread a veil across the forehead, whiter than the face itself-and above that put on a hood, of which the blackness may set off the white by contrast-is there not in all this the vanity of dress? What can one say to the perpetual rolling of the eyes? to the putting on of the stomacher; so artfully as sometimes to conceal, sometimes to disclose, the fastening? For this too they sometimes expose, so as to show the exquisiteness of the cincture, winding the hood entirely round the head. Then like the players, they wear gloves so closely fitted, that they seem to grow upon the hands: and we might speak of their walk, and other artifices more alluring than any ornament of gold. Let us fear, beloved, lest we also hear what the Prophet said to the Hebrew women who were so studious of outward ornament; "Instead of a girdle, thou shalt be girded with a halter, instead of well-set hair, baldness." These things and many others, invented only to be seen and to attract beholders, are more alluring than golden ornaments. These are no trifling faults, but displeasing to God, and enough to mar all the self-denial of virginity.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above he said that God wills all to be saved, and he proved this on the part of God, who is one of all, and on the part of Christ, who is one mediator of all; here he proves the same thing on the part of testimony. And first he brings forward other witnesses; second, his own testimony, at the words "in which I am placed." He says therefore: "he gave himself for all." But did it perhaps suddenly come into God's mind, that he who had chosen to save the Jews only should will to save the whole world? Excluding this he says, "the testimony of which was in its own times"; as if to say: this law is not sudden, but attested of old through the Law and through the Prophets. Isaiah 44:8: "You are my witnesses." Acts 10:43: "To this all the prophets bear witness," etc. "It was confirmed," namely by the fulfillment and showing of signs, and by the preaching of the apostles. "In its own times," namely in which it had been predetermined to come to pass. Ecclesiastes 3:1: "All things have their time." Or: the testimony of the apostles was confirmed at determined times. Acts 1:8: "You shall be witnesses to me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and Samaria, and even to the end of the earth," etc. Then, when he says "in which I am placed," he sets forth his own testimony. And first he shows his office; second, the use of his office, at the word "truth." He says therefore, "in which," namely in the office of bearing witness, "I am placed," namely by God. John 15:16: "I have placed you that you may go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit may remain." "I a preacher," because he placed me for this, that I should preach. Mark, last chapter: "Going into the whole world, preach the Gospel to every creature." But in any craft there are two kinds: some working in a ministerial way, and some who arrange concerning others, namely the master-builders; but in the office of the Church, those who arrange are the apostles; and therefore he says "apostle," as it were with authority. 1 Corinthians 9:2: "You are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord." Now the use of the office is to preach the truth, and this is the office of preachers, that they speak the truth. Proverbs 8:7: "My throat shall meditate truth." Ephesians 4:25: "Speak the truth." But there is no teaching which does not have some truth; but a teaching is condemned in this, that it mixes falsity with truth. And therefore he says, "I speak the truth, I do not lie." Proverbs 8:8: "All my words are right." Job 6:30: "You shall not find iniquity in my tongue." And this is the use of the office, namely to preach the truth without lying, which pertains to my office, who am "teacher of the Gentiles." Now a teacher generates knowledge in the soul of the disciple. But knowledge is not of the false; hence one who teaches what is false is not a teacher. But on the contrary, Matthew 23:8: "Do not be called Rabbi." I answer: he does not forbid the ministry of teaching, but the ambition of office. Acts 9:15: "This man is a vessel of election to me, to carry my name," etc. Isaiah 49:6: "I have given you as a light of the Gentiles," etc. And I ought to teach them "in faith and truth," because he ought to teach faith and good morals. And he says "in faith," that is, concerning those things which pertain to the present state, in which we live according to faith, and "in truth" as regards the state of glory. Then, when he says "I will," he descends to the particular ranks of men. And concerning this he does two things: first he admonishes men about prayer, second, women, at the words "likewise also women." He says therefore, "I will," etc. He requires three things from men in praying: first, that prayer be assiduous; second, pure; third, quiet. Assiduous, as at every time and in every place. And he says "I will," because it is good that a man should pray, and I the teacher will that men pray "in every place," not in Jerusalem only, as the Jews, nor on Mount Gerizim, as the Samaritans, John 4:21. In every place a man can pray spiritually and mentally. Zephaniah 2:11: "Men shall worship him from his own place, all the islands of the Gentiles," etc. But how does the Lord reprove the Pharisees standing at the corners, Matthew 6:5? I answer: mental prayer can be done anywhere, but outward signs of prayer ought not to be made in every place, because a man ought not to appear singular in outward things, since on account of this vain glory could be had. But why then are churches made? I answer: not that a place is of necessity to prayer, but for its well-being; because prayer requires solitude and quiet. Likewise pure. Therefore he says "lifting up pure hands." Augustine: what we do outwardly in praying, we do so that our affection may be stirred up inwardly. For genuflections and things of this kind are not in themselves acceptable to God, but because through these, as through signs of humility, a man is inwardly humbled, just as the raising of the hands signifies the raising of the heart. Lamentations 3:41: "Let us lift up our hearts with our hands to the Lord in heaven." "Lifting up," etc., that is, praying with devotion of heart. Job 8:5f: "If you rise at dawn to God, and entreat the Almighty, if you walk clean and upright, at once he will awaken to you, and will render the dwelling of your righteousness peaceful." Likewise quiet. Therefore he says "without anger and disputation." And he sets down two things. First, namely, that the mind be without anger, which disquiets the soul toward inflicting harm on one's neighbor, from which the soul of the one praying must be free. Sirach 28:3: "Man keeps anger against man, and seeks healing from God." Likewise a man ought to be free from disputation, which can be understood in two ways. In one way, according to the Gloss, that we should not dispute against God, being incredulous of his words, and murmuring against his ordinance. Romans 9:20: "O man, who are you that you should answer back to God," etc. Likewise against one's neighbor, that we should not break peace with him, which is done through disputation. For peace is necessary to one who prays. Matthew 18:19: "If two of you shall agree on earth, concerning any matter which they shall ask, it shall be done for them by my Father." Then, when he says "likewise also women," he sets women in order, and first as to prayer, second as to teaching, at the words "let women in silence." Likewise, first he shows what is required of a woman praying; second he explains what he had said, at the words "not in braided." Concerning the first it must be known that all things which are required for a man praying are required also for women. And therefore he says "likewise also women," as if to say: let them keep all the things that have been said. But he adds two things, namely adornment and modesty, saying "in adorned attire with modesty," the reason for which is, that it is natural that, just as women are of softer body than men, so also of weaker reason. Now it belongs to reason to order the acts and the effects of each thing. But adornment consists in due order and disposition. Thus in inward comeliness, unless all things be ordered by disposition through reason, they do not have spiritual beauty. And therefore, because women fall short in reason, he requires adornment from them. Likewise modesty concerns a shameful act, and therefore it is praiseworthy in those who are accustomed to fall easily into shameful acts, of which sort are the young and women, and therefore this is praised in them, but not in the old and the perfect. Sirach 26:19: "Grace upon grace is a holy and modest woman." Likewise he requires sobriety; hence there follows "and with sobriety." For because in women reason is weak, and sobriety preserves the power of reason, therefore drunkenness is most especially reproved in women. Hence of old among the Romans wine was not given to them. "Not with braided hair, and gold," etc. He explains what he had said, and first concerning adornment, second concerning modesty, at the words "but what becomes." Concerning the first, first he excludes bodily adornment; second he sets down spiritual adornment, at the words "but what becomes." Concerning the first he says: what I said about adorned attire, I do not mean of the exterior, because "not with braided hair," that is, not with the head or the whole body adorned. But women adorn the head especially, which is natural to woman, as is said 1 Corinthians 11:15. And therefore they have adornments on the head. But on the head there is a twofold covering. One is natural, namely the hair, as is said 1 Corinthians 11:5; the other artificial, and in both they adorn themselves, because they braid their hair. Hence he says "not with braided," that is, curled. Isaiah 3:24: "Instead of curled hair there shall be baldness." Likewise he forbids artificial things, when he says "or with gold, or pearls." 1 Peter 3:3: "Not the outward braiding of hair, or the wearing of gold, or of apparel, or the adornment of garments," etc. Or: "not with braided hair, and gold," that is, not having hair braided with gold, or pearls. But as to the whole body he says "or with costly garment"; for this the apostle condemns here, and Isaiah 3:17. But is this indeed a sin? I answer: it must be said that according to Augustine two things are to be considered in the adornment of women, namely simple adornment and painted adornment. Simple adornment, as in garment, and in gold, and things of this kind, can be done with sin in three ways: namely from a depraved intention, as if they intend the stirring of concupiscence, ostentation, or vain glory. Proverbs 7:10: "Prepared to capture souls." Second, if it be done contrary to the custom of one's homeland, which is done in various ways. For what exceeds the accustomed measure of one's homeland comes from lightness of mind. Third, if it exceeds the condition of one's own state. But if right intention, the custom of one's homeland, and the condition of one's state are preserved, it is not a sin. But concerning the painted kind, it is always a sin. For women are not permitted to be adorned except for the sake of men, and men do not wish to be deceived, so that painted women should appear to them. Let there be, therefore, not such adornment, but such as becomes women "professing godliness." For the exterior works of man are as it were a certain profession of the interior man, just as religious have their habit for this, and clerics likewise. Hence unless the interior agrees with the exterior, it is a pretense. So too concerning other interior works. For inwardly we ought to cultivate godliness, that is, to have the worship of God, but outwardly to promise and to render it through good works, which agree with godliness; and likewise to have inwardly, just as we show outwardly. Or, I say, that they ought to adorn themselves not outwardly, but according to what becomes them "professing," that is, what they ought to profess, godliness through good works. Sirach 19:27: "The attire of the body, and the laughter of the teeth, and the walk of a man declare concerning him."”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1714
A.D.
Matthew Henry Reformed
1662–1714
“I. Here is a charge, that women who profess the Christian religion should be modest, sober, silent, and submissive, as becomes their place. 1. They must be very modest in their apparel, not affecting gaudiness, gaiety, or costliness (you may read the vanity of a person's mind in the gaiety and gaudiness of his habit), because they have better ornaments with which they should adorn themselves, with good works. Note, Good works are the best ornament; these are, in the sight of God, of great price. Those that profess godliness should, in their dress, as well as other things, act as becomes their profession; instead of laying out their money on fine clothes, they must lay it out in works of piety and charity, which are properly called good works. 2. Women must learn the principles of their religion, learn Christ, learn the scriptures; they must not think that their sex excuses them from that learning which is necessary to salvation. 3. They must be silent, submissive, and subject, and not usurp authority. The reason given is because Adam was first formed, then Eve out of him, to denote her subordination to him and dependence upon him; and that she was made for him, to be a help-meet for him. And as she was last in the creation, which is one reason for her subjection, so she was first in the transgression, and that is another reason. Adam was not deceived, that is, not first; the serpent did not immediately set upon him, but the woman was first in the transgression (Co2 11:3), and it was part of the sentence, Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee, Gen 3:16. But it is a word of comfort (Ti1 2:15) that those who continue in sobriety shall be saved in child-bearing, or with child-bearing - the Messiah, who was born of a woman, should break the serpent's head (Gen 3:15); or the sentence which they are under for sin shall be no bar to their acceptance with Christ, if they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness, with sobriety. II. Here observe, 1. The extensiveness of the rules of Christianity; they reach not only to men, but to women, not only to their persons, but also to their dress, which must be modest, like their sex; and to their outward deportment and behaviour, it must be in silence, with all subjection. 2. Women are to profess godliness as well as men; for they are baptized, and thereby stand engaged to exercise themselves to godliness; and, to their honour be it spoken, many of them were eminent professors of Christianity in the days of the apostles, as the book of Acts will inform us. 3. Women being more in danger of exceeding in their apparel, it was more necessary to caution them in this respect. 4. The best ornaments for professors of godliness are good works. 5. According to Paul, women must be learners, and are not allowed to be public teachers in the church; for teaching is an office of authority, and the woman must not usurp authority over the man, but is to be in silence. But, notwithstanding this prohibition, good women may and ought to teach their children at home the principles of religion. Timothy from a child had known the holy scriptures; and who should teach him but his mother and grandmother? Ti2 3:15. Aquila and his wife Priscilla expounded unto Apollos the way of God more perfectly; but then they did it privately, for they took him unto them, Act 18:26. 6. Here are two very good reasons given for the man's authority over the woman, and her subjection to the man, Ti1 2:13, Ti1 2:14. Adam was first formed, then Eve; she was created for the man, and not the man for the woman (Co1 11:9); then she was deceived, and brought the man into the transgression. 7. Though the difficulties and dangers of childbearing are many and great, as they are part of the punishment inflicted on the sex for Eve's transgression, yet here is much for her support and encouragement: Notwithstanding she shall be saved, etc. Though in sorrow, yet she shall bring forth, and be a living mother of living children; with this proviso, that they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness, with sobriety: and women, under the circumstance of child-bearing should by faith lay hold of this promise for their support in the needful time.”
Source
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“But (which becometh women professing god likeness),.... By which is meant not any particular grace, was it, the fear of God might be designed, and so the Syriac version renders it; nor the whole of internal religion only; nor the form of godliness, or the whole scheme of Gospel truth, which is according to godliness; nor only outward holiness of life and conversation; but the whole of all this, all religion, internal and external, the whole of godliness, both in a doctrinal and in a practical way. All this, these women the apostle gives directions unto, had made a profession of, and had been baptized upon it, and received members of churches; and as yet held their profession: and such persons, it best became them not so much to adorn themselves with any outward adornings, as with good works; such as are mentioned in Th1 5:10 Good works are like good clothes, to which the apostle alludes; they do not make persons men and women, but they adorn them as such; so good works, they do not make men and women Christians, or believers, but they adorn them as such; they are ornaments to their persons, and to their profession, and to the Gospel they profess. See Tit 2:10.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“In like manner also - That is, he wills or commands what follows, as he had commanded what went before. That women adorn themselves - Και τας γυναικας ες καταστολῃ κοσμιῳ. The apostle seems to refer here to different parts of the Grecian and Roman dress. The στολη, stola, seems to have been originally very simple. It was a long piece of cloth, doubled in the middle, and sewed up on both sides, leaving room only for the arms; at the top, a piece was cut out, or a slit made, through which the head passed. It hung down to the feet, both before and behind, and was girded with the zona round the body, just under the breasts. It was sometimes made with, sometimes without, sleeves; and, that it might sit the better, it was gathered on each shoulder with a band or buckle. Some of the Greek women wore them open on each side, from the bottom up above the knee, so as to discover a part of the thigh. These were termed φαινομηριδες, showers (discoverers) of the thigh; but it was, in general, only young girls or immodest women who wore them thus. The καταστολη seems to have been the same as the pallium or mantle, which, being made nearly in the form of the stola, hung down to the waist, both in back and front, was gathered on the shoulder with a band or buckle, had a hole or slit at top for the head to pass through, and hung loosely over the stola, without being confined by the zona or girdle. Representations of these dresses may be seen in Lens' Costume des Peuples de l'Antiquit, fig. 11, 12, 13, and 16. A more modest and becoming dress than the Grecian was never invented; it was, in a great measure, revived in England about the year 1805, and in it, simplicity, decency, and elegance were united; but it soon gave place to another mode, in which frippery and nonsense once more prevailed. It was too rational to last long; and too much like religious simplicity to be suffered in a land of shadows, and a world of painted outsides. With shamefacedness and sobriety - The stola, catastola, girdle, etc., though simple in themselves, were often highly ornamented both with gold and precious stones; and, both among the Grecian and Roman women, the hair was often crisped and curled in the most variegated and complex manner. To this the apostle alludes when he says: Μη εν πλεγμασιν, η χρυσῳ, η μαργαριταις, η ἱματισμῳ πολυτελει· Not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly raiment. The costly raiment might refer to the materials out of which the raiment was made, and to the workmanship; the gold and pearls, to the ornaments on the raiment. With shame-facedness or modesty, μετα αιδους. This would lead them to avoid every thing unbecoming or meretricious in the mode or fashion of their dress. With sobriety, μετα σωφροσυνης. Moderation would lead them to avoid all unnecessary expense. They might follow the custom or costume of the country as to the dress itself, for nothing was ever more becoming than the Grecian stola, catastola, and zona; but they must not imitate the extravagance of those who, through impurity or littleness of mind, decked themselves merely to attract the eye of admiration, or set in lying action the tongue of flattery. Woman has been invidiously defined: An animal fond of dress. How long will they permit themselves to be thus degraded? Those beautiful lines of Homer, in which he speaks of the death of Euphorbus, who was slain by Menelaus, show how anciently the Grecians plaited and adorned their hair: - Αντικρυ δ' απαλοιο δι' αυχενος ηλυθ' ακωκη· Δουπησεν δε πεσων, αραβησε δε τευχε' επ' αυτῳ. Αἱματι οἱ δευοντο κομαι, Χαριτεσσιν ὁμοιαι, Πλοχμοι θ' οἱ χρυσῳ τε και αργυρῳ εσφηκωντο. Il. xvii., ver. 49. Wide through the neck appears the ghastly wound; Prone sinks the warrior, and his arms rebound. The shining circlets of his golden hair, Which e'en the Graces might be proud to wear, Instarr'd with gems and gold bestrew the shore, With dust dishonor'd, and deform'd with gore. Pope. Or thus, more literally: - Sounding he fell; loud rang his batter'd arms. His locks, which e'en the Graces might have own'd, Blood sullied, and his ringlets wound about With twine of gold and silver, swept the dust. Cowper. The extravagance to which the Grecian and Asiatic women went in their ornaments might well be a reason for the apostle's command. Kypke, however, denies that any particular article of dress is intended here, and says that καταστολη is to be understood as coming from καταστελλω, to restrain, repress; and he refers it to that government of the mind, or moderation which women should exercise over their dress and demeanour in general, and every thing that may fall under the observation of the senses. All this, undoubtedly, the apostle had in view. When either women or men spend much time, cost, and attention on decorating their persons, it affords a painful proof that within there is little excellence, and that they are endeavoring to supply the want of mind and moral good by the feeble and silly aids of dress and ornament. Were religion out of the question, common sense would say in all these things: Be decent; but be moderate and modest.”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“The context requires that we understand these directions as to women, in relation to their deportment in public worship, though the rules will hold good on other occasions also. in modest apparel--"in seemly guise" [ELLICOTT]. The adjective means properly. orderly, decorous, becoming; the noun in secular writings means conduct, bearing. But here "apparel." Women are apt to love fine dress; and at Ephesus the riches of some (Ti1 6:17) would lead them to dress luxuriously. The Greek in Tit 2:3 is a more general term meaning "deportment." shamefacedness--TRENCH spells this word according to its true derivation, "shamefastness" (that which is made fast by an honorable shame); as "steadfastness" (compare Ti1 2:11-12). sobriety--"self-restraint" [ALFORD]. Habitual inner self-government [TRENCH]. I prefer ELLICOTT'S translation, "sober-mindedness": the well-balanced state of mind arising from habitual self-restraint. with--Greek, "in." braided hair--literally, "plaits," that is, plaited hair: probably with the "gold and pearls" intertwined (Pe1 3:3). Such gaud is characteristic of the spiritual harlot (Rev 17:4).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.