The interpretation timeline
2 Thessalonians 2:4 Douay-Rheims

Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.

A.D. 165 – 1832 11 witnesses 14 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
165
A.D.
Justin Martyr Patristic
A.D. 100–165
“Now I am aware that your teachers, sirs, admit the whole of the words of this passage to refer to Christ; and I am likewise aware that they maintain He has not yet come; or if they say that He has come, they assert that it is not known who He is; but when He shall become manifest and glorious, then it shall be known who He is. And then, they say, the events mentioned in this passage shall happen, just as if there was no fruit as yet from the words of the prophecy. O unreasoning men! understanding not what has been proved by all these passages, that two advents of Christ have been announced: the one, in which He is set forth as suffering, inglorious, dishonoured, and crucified; but the other, in which He shall come from heaven with glory, when the man of apostasy, who speaks strange things against the Most High, shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians, who, having learned the true worship of God from the law, and the word which went forth from Jerusalem by means of the apostles of Jesus, have fled for safety to the God of Jacob and God of Israel; and we who were filled with war, and mutual slaughter, and every wickedness, have each through the whole earth changed our warlike weapons — our swords into ploughshares, and our spears into implements of tillage— and we cultivate piety, righteousness, philanthropy, faith, and hope, which we have from the Father Himself through Him who was crucified; and sitting each under his vine, i.e., each man possessing his own married wife.”
Source
202
A.D.
Irenaeus Patristic
c. A.D. 130–202
“And the Apostle Paul also, saying, "For though ye have served them which are no gods; ye now know God, or rather, are known of God," has made a separation between those that were not [gods] and Him who is God. And again, speaking of Antichrist, he says, "who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped." He points out here those who are called gods, by such as know not God, that is, idols. For the Father of all is called God, and is so; and Antichrist shall be lifted up, not above Him, but above those which are indeed called gods, but are not. And Paul himself says that this is true: "We know that an idol is nothing, and that there is none other God but one. For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth; yet to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we through Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him." For he has made a distinction, and separated those which are indeed called gods, but which are none, from the one God the Father, from whom are all things, and, he has confessed in the most decided manner in his own person, one Lord Jesus Christ.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“We know that "Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light" -much more into a man of light-and that at last he will "show himself to be even God," and will exhibit "great signs and wonders, insomuch that, if it were possible, he shall deceive the very elect.”
379
A.D.
Basil of Caesarea Patristic
c. A.D. 330–379
“In truth, both of our ears rang on learning of the shameless and inhuman heresy of those who persecuted you. They had no regard for age, nor for the labors of a life well spent, nor for the affection of the people. On the contrary, they tortured and dishonored bodies, handed them over to exile and plundered whatever property they were able to find, not fearing the censure of men nor foreseeing the fearful requital of the just Judge.… But, along with these considerations, there came this thought also: The Lord has not entirely abandoned his churches, has he? And this is not the last hour, is it? Is apostasy finding an entrance through them, in order that now the impious one may be revealed, "the son of perdition, who opposes and is exalted above all that is called God, or that is worshiped"? But if the trial is transitory, bear it, noble champions of Christ.… For if all creation is destroyed and the scheme of the world is altered, what wonder is it if we also, being a part of creation, suffer the common evils and are given over to afflictions?… The crowns of martyrs await you, brothers; the choirs of confessors are ready to reach out to you their hands and to receive you into their own number.”
Source
date
unknown
c. A.D. 380
“For in the last days false prophets shall be multiplied, and such as corrupt the word; and the sheep shall be changed into wolves, and love into hatred: for through the abounding of iniquity the love of many shall wax cold. For men shall hate, and persecute, and betray one another. And then shall appear the deceiver of the world, the enemy of the truth, the prince of lies, [2 Thessalonians 2:3-12] whom the Lord Jesus "shall destroy with the spirit of His mouth, who takes away the wicked with His lips; and many shall be offended at Him. But they that endure to the end, the same shall be saved. And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven;" [Isaiah 11:4; Matthew 24:1-51] and afterwards shall be the voice of a trumpet by the archangel; and in that interval shall be the revival of those that were asleep. And then shall the Lord come, and all His saints with Him, with a great concussion above the clouds, with the angels of His power, [Matthew 16:27] in the throne of His kingdom, to condemn the devil, the deceiver of the world, and to render to every one according to his deeds. "Then shall the wicked go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous shall go into life eternal," [Matthew 25:46] to inherit those things "which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered into the heart of man, such things as God has prepared for them that love Him;" [1 Corinthians 2:9] and they shall rejoice in the kingdom of God, which is in Christ Jesus.”
Source
386
A.D.
Cyril of Jerusalem Patristic
A.D. 313–386
“Such is Paul's account. And we have reached the "falling away." Men, that is, have fallen away from the true faith. Some proclaim the identity of Father and Son. Others dare to assert that one should believe Christ has come into existence out of nonexistence. Formerly heretics were quite evident, but now the church is full of masked heretics. For men have deserted the truth and want to have their ears tickled. Make a plausible case, and everyone is ready to listen to you. Talk of changing one's life, and everyone deserts you. The majority have fallen away from the sound doctrines and are readier to choose what is bad than to prefer what is good. So there you have the "falling away," and the coming of the enemy is to be expected next. Meanwhile, he has begun to send out his forerunners here and there, so that the spoil may be prepared for him when he comes. Therefore, brothers, look to yourselves. Watch over your souls carefully.”
Source
“Who opposeth and exalteth himself against all that is called God, or that is worshipped; (against every God; Antichrist forsooth will abhor the idols,) so that he seateth himself in the temple of God. What temple then? He means, the Temple of the Jews which has been destroyed. For God forbid that it should be the one in which we are! Why say we this? That we may not be supposed to favour ourselves. For if he comes to the Jews as Christ, and desires to be worshipped by the Jews, he will make great account of the Temple, that he may more completely beguile them; making it supposed that he is the man of the race of David, who shall build up the Temple which was erected by Solomon. And Antichrist will come at the time when there shall not be left one stone upon another in the Temple of the Jews, according to the doom pronounced by our Saviour; for when, either decay of time, or demolition ensuing on pretence of new buildings, or from any other causes, shall have overthrown all the stones, I mean not merely of the outer circuit, but of the inner shrine also, where the Cherubim were, then shall he come with all signs and lying wonders, exalting himself against all idols; at first indeed making a pretence of benevolence, but afterwards displaying his relentless temper, and that chiefly against the Saints of God.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“Paul therefore, in speaking of Antichrist, would not have passed over these things if they had been profitable. Let us not therefore enquire into these things. For he will not come so bending his knees, but "exalting himself against all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he sitteth in the temple of God, setting himself forth as God." For as the devil fell by pride, so he who is wrought upon by him is anointed unto pride.”
Source
“"And exalteth himself against all that is called God or is worshiped." For he will not introduce idolatry, but will be a kind of opponent to God; he will abolish all the gods, and will order men to worship him instead of God, and he will be seated in the temple of God, not that in Jerusalem only, but also in every Church. "Setting himself forth," he says; he does not say, saying it, but endeavoring to show it. For he will perform great works, and will show wonderful signs.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“No one can doubt that Paul is here speaking of Antichrist, telling us that the day of judgment (which he calls the day of the Lord) will not come without the prior coming of a figure whom he calls the Apostate, meaning, of course, an apostate from the Lord God. And if this appellation can rightly be attached to all the ungodly, how much more to him! There is, however, some uncertainty about the "temple" in which he is to take his seat. Is it the ruins of the temple built by King Solomon, or actually in a church? For the apostle would not say "the temple of God" if he meant the temple of some idol or demon. For that reason some people would have it that Antichrist means here not the leader himself but what we may call his whole body, the multitude, that is, of those who belong to him, together with himself, their leader.… For myself I am much astonished at the great presumption of those who venture such guesses.”
Source
“He who speaks on his own seeks his own glory. This will be that one who is called the Antichrist, "exalting himself," as the apostle says, "above all that is called God and that is worshiped." Indeed, the Lord, announcing that he would seek his own glory, not the glory of the Father, said to the Jews, "I have come in the name of my Father, and you have not received me; another will come in his own name, this one you will receive." He signified that they would receive the Antichrist, who would seek the glory of his own name, puffed up, hollow, and so not enduring but in fact ruinous. But our Lord Jesus Christ offered us a great example of humility.”
Source
749
A.D.
John of Damascus Patristic
A.D. 676–749
“And the apostle says: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition: who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God; in the temple of God he said; not our temple, but the old Jewish temple. For he will come not to us but to the Jews: not for Christ or the things of Christ: wherefore he is called Antichrist.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1272
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“He who is Apostle above showed things to come, as regards the punishments of the wicked and the rewards of the good; here he announces things to come as regards the dangers of the Church, which will be in the time of Antichrist. And first he announces the truth about the future dangers; second he warns them to remain in the truth, at the place therefore, brothers. Concerning the first he does two things: first he excludes falsity; second he instructs concerning the truth, at the place unless. Again the first is divided into three: first he recalls that from which they ought to be induced; second he shows to what they ought to be induced, at the place that you be not quickly; third he removes that which could move them, at the place nor by spirit. Now he induces from three things, namely from his own prayers, at we beg, not from precepts. Philem. 8: having much confidence in Christ Jesus to command you what pertains to the matter, for charity's sake I rather beseech. Second, from the coming of Christ, desirable to the good, though terrible to the wicked. Amos 5:18: woe to them that desire the day of the Lord, et cetera. 2 Tim. 4:8: and not only to me, but to them also that love his coming, et cetera. Apoc., last chapter: come, Lord Jesus, et cetera. Third, from the desire and love of the whole congregation of the saints, unto the same, namely where Christ is, because Matt. 24:28: where the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together. Or unto the same, that is, into the same, because all the saints will be in the same place and glory. Ps. 49:5: gather ye together his saints to him. But to what does he induce them? That you be not quickly moved from your sense. Now to be moved is one thing, to be terrified another. He is moved from his sense who abandons what he held; as if he were to say: do not quickly let go of my teaching. Ecclus. 19:4: he that is hasty to give credit is light of heart. But terror is a certain trepidation, with dread of what is contrary. And therefore he says: be not terrified. Job 15:21: the sound of dread is always in his ears. Likewise, if there is peace, they always suspect ambushes. Wis. 17:10: for whereas wickedness is fearful, it beareth witness to its condemnation, et cetera. Then when he says nor by spirit, he removes what could move them, first in particular, second in general, at the place lest anyone. Now a person is seduced through a false revelation; hence he says nor by spirit, that is: if anyone should say that something contrary to my teaching has been revealed to him through the Holy Spirit, or by the Holy Spirit, do not be terrified. 1 John 4:1: believe not every spirit. Ezek. 13:3: woe to the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit, and see nothing. Sometimes too Satan transforms himself into an angel of light, as is said 2 Cor. 11:14; and 3 Kings, last chapter: I will go out, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. Second, through reasoning, or a false exposition of Scripture; therefore he says nor by word. 2 Tim. 2:17: their speech spreadeth like a canker. Eph. 5:6: let no man deceive you with vain words. Third, through authority adduced in an evil sense. 2 Peter, last chapter: as also our most dear brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, hath written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are certain things hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as also the other Scriptures, et cetera. But concerning what were they being seduced? As though the day of the Lord were at hand. And he says nor by an epistle as if sent by us. Because in the first epistle, unless it be well understood, it seems to say that the Lord's coming is at hand, as that: then we who live, et cetera. Then when he says lest anyone, etc., he does the same in general. Luke 21:8: take heed you be not seduced, et cetera. 1 Cor. 15:33: be not seduced. Now the reason why the Apostle removes these things, namely concerning the Lord's coming, is that a prelate ought in no way to wish that any goods be procured through a lie. 1 Cor. 15:15: we are found also false witnesses, et cetera. Likewise, because the thing believed was dangerous, namely that the day of the Lord was at hand. First, because occasion would be given for greater seduction, because after the times of the apostles there were to be some who would say that they were Christ. Luke 21:8: many will say: I am, et cetera. And therefore the Apostle was unwilling. Likewise the Demon frequently pretends to be Christ, as is clear concerning blessed Martin. And therefore, lest they be seduced, he was unwilling. But Augustine gives another reason, that a danger to faith would threaten. Hence someone might say: the Lord will come late, and then I will prepare myself for him. Another would say: he will come soon, and therefore I will prepare myself now. Another would say: I do not know. And this one speaks better, because he agrees with Christ. But he errs more who says: soon; because, the term having elapsed, men would despair, and would believe that the things written are false. Then when he says unless the departure come first, etc., he establishes the truth; and first he shows what things are to come regarding the coming of Antichrist. And there are two things, one of which precedes the coming of Antichrist; the other is his coming itself. The first is the departure, which is explained in many ways in the Gloss. And first, a departure from the faith, because it was to be that the faith would be received by the whole world. Matt. 24:14: and this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world. This therefore precedes, which according to Augustine has not yet been fulfilled, and afterward many will depart from the faith, et cetera. 1 Tim. 4:1: in the last times some shall depart from the faith, et cetera. Matt. 24:12: the charity of many shall grow cold. Or a departure from the Roman empire, to which the whole world was subject. Now Augustine says that this is figured in Dan. 2:31 in the statue, where four kingdoms are named; and after those, the coming of Christ, and that this was a fitting sign, because the Roman empire was established for this, that under its power the faith might be preached throughout the whole world. But how is this, since the nations withdrew from the Roman empire long ago, and yet Antichrist has not yet come? It must be said that it has not yet ceased, but has been changed from temporal into spiritual, as Pope Leo says in a sermon on the apostles. And therefore it must be said that the departure from the Roman empire ought to be understood not only as regards the temporal, but as regards the spiritual, namely from the Catholic faith of the Roman Church. Now this is a fitting sign, that just as Christ came when the Roman empire ruled over all, so conversely the sign of Antichrist is a departure from it. Second, he foretells the second thing to come, namely Antichrist. And first as regards his guilt and punishment; second as regards his power, at the place whose coming. Again, first he touches on his guilt and punishment commonly and implicitly; second he explains both, at the place who opposes. He says therefore: the departure will come first, and then he will be revealed. Now he is called the man of sin and the son of perdition, according to the Gloss, because just as the fullness of virtue abounded in Christ, so in Antichrist a multitude of all sins abounds. And just as Christ is better than all the saints, so he is worse than all the wicked. And for this reason he is called the man of sin, because he will be totally given over to sins. But he is not called man of sin in such a way that he could not be worse, because evil never corrupts the whole good, although as regards act he will not be able to be worse. But no man could be better than Christ. Now he is called son of perdition, that is, appointed to utter perdition. Job 21:30: the wicked man is reserved to the day of destruction, and he shall be led to the day of wrath. Or of perdition, that is, of the Devil, not by nature, but by the completion of his malice, which will be completed in him. And he says he will be revealed, because just as all the goods and virtues of the saints who preceded Christ were a figure of Christ, so in all the persecutions of the Church the tyrants were, as it were, a figure of Antichrist, and Antichrist lay hidden there; and thus all that malice, which lies hidden in them, will be revealed at that time. Then when he says who opposes, he explains what he had said. And first he shows how he is the man of sin; second how he is the son of perdition, at the place and then shall be revealed. Again, first he foretells his future guilt; second he assigns its cause, at the place and then. Again, first he describes the guilt, second he says that he is not announcing a new teaching, at the place you remember not. Again, first he shows the guilt, second its sign, at the place so that, et cetera. Now his guilt is twofold, namely opposition to God; hence he says who is opposed to all good spirits. Job 15:26: he ran against God with neck erect, and with fat neck he is armed, as also are his members. Isa. 3:8: their tongue and their devices are against the Lord, to provoke the eyes of his majesty. The second is that he prefers himself to Christ; therefore he says he is lifted up, et cetera. Now God is spoken of in three ways. First, naturally. Deut. 6:4: hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God. Second, by opinion. Ps. 95:5: all the gods of the Gentiles are devils. Third, by participation. Ps. 81:6: I have said: you are gods. But Antichrist will set himself above all these. Dan. 11:36: he shall be lifted up, and magnified against every god, and shall speak great things against the God of gods. Now the sign of the guilt is when he says so that in the temple, et cetera. For the pride of Antichrist is greater than the pride of all who preceded him. Hence just as it is read of Caius Caesar, that while he was still living he wished to be worshipped, setting up his statue in every temple, and Ezek. 28:2 it is said of the king of Tyre: thou hast said, I am God, et cetera: so it is credible that Antichrist will do likewise to them, saying that he is God and man. And as a sign of this he will sit in the temple. But in which temple? Was it not destroyed by the Romans? And therefore some say that Antichrist is of the tribe of Dan, which tribe among the other twelve is not named in Apoc. 7:5. And therefore the Jews will first receive him, and will rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, and thus that will be fulfilled, Dan. 9:27: there shall be in the temple the abomination and the idol; Matt. 24:15: and when you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place, he that readeth let him understand. But some say that neither Jerusalem nor the temple will ever be rebuilt, but the desolation will persist even to the consummation and the end. And this also some Jews believe. Therefore it is expounded in the temple of God, that is, in the Church, because many from the Church will receive him. Or according to Augustine, he sits in the temple of God, that is, he rules and dominates, as though he himself with his messengers were the temple of God, just as Christ is with his own. Then when he says do you not remember, he shows that he writes nothing new; as if he were to say: formerly, when I was with you, I said this. 2 John 5: I write not a new commandment to you, but the old commandment, which you had from the beginning. 2 Cor. 10:11: such as we were in word through letters when absent, such also when present in deed, et cetera.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Who opposeth and exalteth - He stands against and exalts himself above all Divine authority, and above every object of adoration, and every institution relative to Divine worship, σεβασμα, himself being the source, whence must originate all the doctrines of religion, and all its rites and ceremonies; so that sitting in the temple of God - having the highest place and authority in the Christian Church, he acts as God - taking upon himself God's titles and attributes, and arrogating to himself the authority that belongs to the Most High. The words ως Θεον, as God, are wanting in ABD, many others, Erpen's Arabic, the Coptic, Sahidic, Ethiopic, Armenian, the Vulgate, some copies of the Itala, and the chief of the Greek fathers. Griesbach has left them out of the text, and Professor White says, Certissime delenda; "They should most certainly be erased." There is indeed no evidence of their being authentic, and the text reads much better with out them: So that he sitteth in the temple of God, etc.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.