Beware lest any man cheat you by philosophy, and vain deceit; according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ:

“I hear also those words of his, "And these things I say, lest any man should beguile you with enticing words, or one should enter in to spoil you." And again, "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ;" branding not all philosophy, but the Epicurean, which Paul mentions in the Acts of the Apostles, which abolishes providence and deifies pleasure, and whatever other philosophy honours the elements, but places not over them the efficient cause, nor apprehends the Creator.”

“The apostle, so far back as his own time, foresaw, indeed, that philosophy would do violent injury to the truth. This admonition about false philosophy he was induced to offer after he had been at Athens, had become acquainted with that loquacious city, and had there had a taste of its huckstering wiseacres and talkers.”

“The principle of the philosophers and stoics is different, dearest brother, who say that all sins are equal, and that a grave man ought not easily to be moved. But there is a wide difference between Christians and philosophers. And when the apostle says, "Beware, lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit," we are to avoid those things which do not come from God's clemency, but are begotten of the presumption of a too rigid philosophy. Concerning Moses, moreover, we find it said in the Scriptures, "Now the man Moses was very meek; " and the Lord in His Gospel says, "Be ye merciful, as your Father also had mercy upon you; " and again, "They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick." What medical skill can he exercise who says, "I cure the sound only, who have no need of a physician? "We ought to give our assistance, our healing art, to those who are wounded; neither let us think them dead, but rather let us regard them as lying half alive, whom we see to have been wounded in the fatal persecution, and who, if they had been altogether dead, would never from the same men become afterwards both confessors and martyrs.”

“It is not therefore utility, but enjoyment, which they seek from philosophy. And this Cicero indeed testified. "Truly," he says, "all their disputation, although it contains most abundant fountains of virtue and knowledge, yet, when compared with their actions and accomplishments, I fear lest it should seem not to have brought so much advantage to the business of men as enjoyment to their times of relaxation." He ought not to have feared, since he spoke the truth; but as if he were afraid lest he should be arraigned by the philosophers on a charge of betraying a mystery, he did not venture confidently to pronounce that which was true, that they do not dispute for the purpose of teaching, but for their own enjoyment in their leisure; and since they are the advisers of actions, and do not themselves act at all, they are to be regarded as mere talkers. But assuredly, because they contributed no advantage to life, they neither obeyed their own decrees, nor has any one been found, through so many ages, who lived in accordance with their laws. Therefore philosophy must altogether be laid aside, because we are not to devote ourselves to the pursuit of wisdom, for this has no limit or moderation; but we must be wise, and that indeed quickly.”

“For the method of godliness consists of these two things, pious doctrines, and virtuous practice: and neither are the doctrines acceptable to God apart from good works, nor does God accept the works which are not perfected with pious doctrines. For what profit is it, to know well the doctrines concerning God, and yet to be a vile fornicator? And again, what profit is it, to be nobly temperate, and an impious blasphemer? A most precious possession therefore is the knowledge of doctrines: also there is need of a wakeful soul, since there are many that make spoil through philosophy and vain deceit. The Greeks on the one hand draw men away by their smooth tongue, for honey droppeth from a harlot's lips: whereas they of the Circumcision deceive those who come to them by means of the Divine Scriptures, which they miserably misinterpret though studying them from childhood to old age, and growing old in ignorance. But the children of heretics, by their good words and smooth tongue, deceive the hearts of the innocent, disguising with the name of Christ as it were with honey the poisoned arrows of their impious doctrines: concerning all of whom together the Lord saith, Take heed lest any man mislead you. This is the reason for the teaching of the Creed and for expositions upon it.”

“Let us, therefore, fear the judgment which awaits teachers. For a severe judgment will those teachers receive "who teach, but do not," [Matthew 23:3] and those who take upon them the name of Christ falsely, and say: We teach the truth, and yet go wandering about idly, and exalt themselves, and make their boast in the mind of the flesh. [Colossians 2:18] These, moreover, are like "the blind man who leads the blind man, and they both fall into the ditch." [Matthew 15:14] And they will receive judgment, because in their talkativeness and their frivolous teaching they teach natural wisdom and the "frivolous error of the plausible words of the wisdom of men," [Colossians 2:8] "according to the will of the prince of the dominion of the air, and of the spirit which works in those men who will not obey, according to the training of this world, and not according to the doctrine of Christ." [Ephesians 2:2] But if you have received "the word of knowledge, or the word of instruction, or of prophecy," [1 Corinthians 12:8-10] blessed be God, "who helps every man without grudging — that God who gives to every man and does not upbraid him." [James 1:5]”

“Seest thou how he shows him to be a thief, and an alien, and one that enters in softly? For he has already represented him to be entering in. "Beware." And he well said "maketh spoil." As one digging away a mound from underneath, may give no perceptible sign, yet it gradually settles, so do you also beware; for this is his main point, not even to let himself be perceived. As if some one were robbing every day, and he (the owner of the house) were told, "Beware lest there be some one"; and he shows the way-through this way-as if we were to say, through this chamber; so, "through philosophy," says he. Then because the term "philosophy" has an appearance of dignity, he added, "and vain deceit." For there is also a good deceit; such as many have been deceived by, which one ought not even to call a deceit at all. Whereof Jeremiah speaks; "O Lord, Thou hast deceived me, and I was deceived" (Jer. xx. 7); for such as this one ought not to call a deceit at all; for Jacob also deceived his father, but that was not a deceit, but an economy. "Through his philosophy," he saith, "and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." Now he sets about to reprove their observance of particular days, meaning by elements of the world the sun and moon; as he also said in the Epistle to the Galatians, "How turn ye back again to the weak and beggarly elements?" (Gal. iv. 9.) And he said not observances of days, but in general of the present world, to show its worthlessness: for if the present world be nothing, much more then its elements. Having first shown how great benefits and kindnesses they had received, he afterwards brings on his accusation, thereby to show its greater seriousness, and to convict his hearers. Thus too the Prophets do. They always first point out the benefits, and then they magnify their accusation; as Esaias saith, "I have begotten children, and exalted them, but they have rejected me" (Isa. i. 2, Sept.); and again, "O my people, what have I done unto thee, or wherein have I grieved thee, or wherein have I wearied thee"? (Mic. vi. 3) and David; as when he says, "I heard thee in the secret place of the tempest" (Ps. lxxxi. 7, Sept.); and again, "Open thy mouth, and I will fill it." (Ps. lxxxi. 10.) And everywhere you will find it the same. That indeed were most one's duty, not to be persuaded by them, even did they say aught to the purpose; as it is, however, obligations apart even, it would be our duty to shun those things. "And not after Christ," he saith. For were it in such sort a matter done by halves, that ye were able to serve both the one and the other, not even so ought ye to do it; as it is, however, he suffers you not to be "after Christ." Those things withdraw you from Him. Having first shaken to pieces the Grecian observances, he next overthrows the Jewish ones also. For both Greeks and Jews practiced many observances, but the former from philosophy, the latter from the Law. First then, he makes at those against whom lay the heavier accusation. How, "not after Christ"?”

“Above he warned that they should not fall away from the faith through any deceit of speech; here he sets down the reason for the warning, which is taken from the goods that were in them, which they ought not to lose, but rather to progress in. And first he recalls the goods they had; second he shows how they may progress in them, at the place "as therefore." Concerning the first he does two things: for first he shows how their goods are known to him; second, what goods are in them, at the place "rejoicing." He says therefore "for even if," etc.; as if to say: although I have not preached to you, nor do I see your deeds with my eyes, yet I am present with you in spirit, rejoicing in affection over your goods. 1 Cor. 5:3: "absent indeed in body, but present in spirit." Prov. 10:1: "a wise son makes glad his father," etc. And this because it was revealed to him through the Holy Spirit, and therefore he says "but in spirit I am with you." 4 Kings 5:26: "was not my heart present, when the man returned from the chariot to meet you," etc. "Rejoicing," I say, "I am," because I am seeing the order, that is, your ordered conduct. 1 Cor. 14:40: "let all things be done honestly and according to order among you." Judg. 5:20: "the stars remaining in their order and their course," etc. And "the firmness," etc. 2 Tim. 2:19: "the firm foundation of God stands," etc. And this "in Christ." Eph. 3:17: "that Christ may dwell through faith in your hearts," etc. For the Church is a spiritual building. Eph. 2:21: "in whom every building, being constructed, grows into a holy temple in the Lord." Now the goodness of this consists in a due foundation, which is faith, and in a due superstructure. And therefore he set down these two. Then when he says "as therefore," etc., he warns them to keep these things. And first, to progress; second, to persist; third, to give thanks. He says therefore: "as you received Christ our Lord," without perverting it, "walk in him." Rom. 12:9: "cleaving to what is good." The Church is sometimes compared to a spiritual building. 1 Cor. 3:17: "the temple of God is holy, which you are." Sometimes to a tree, because it bears fruit. And the same is the comparison of the foundation to the house, and of the root to the tree, because the firmness of each—root and foundation—is Christ. Isa. 11:10: "there shall be the root of Jesse, which stands as a sign of the peoples." 1 Cor. 3:11: "no one can lay another foundation besides that which has been laid, which is Christ Jesus." Therefore he says "rooted," namely as good branches, "and built up in him," and "confirmed," namely as good stones, that is, if you persist in his faith. 1 Pet., last chapter: "your adversary," etc., and afterward: "resist him, strong in faith," etc. And this "as you have learned," namely in the true faith. Gal. 1:9: "if anyone preaches to you a gospel besides that which you have received, let him be anathema," etc. "Abounding in him in thanksgiving," that is, giving thanks abundantly. 1 Thess., last chapter: "in all things give thanks." 2 Macc. 1:11: "having been delivered from great dangers by God, we give magnificent thanks to him," etc. Then when he says "see," he warns lest they be deceived through vain wisdom. And first he sets down the warning; second, the reason, at the place "in him." Concerning the first, first he teaches to avoid what can deceive; second he shows why it deceives, at the place "according to the tradition." But that someone be deceived through secular wisdom happens in two ways, namely sometimes through the real principles of philosophy, sometimes through sophistic reasonings. And he teaches to beware of both. Hence he says "lest anyone," etc., that is, through philosophical teachings. Isa. 47:10: "your wisdom and this knowledge have deceived you." For many, on account of philosophy, are deceived, straying from the faith. Jer. 10:14: "every man has become foolish by his own knowledge." As to the second he says "and vain deceit," which is founded only upon the apparent entanglement of words. Eph. 5:6: "let no one seduce you with vain words." But how does one seduce? He who seduces must have something apparent, and something not existing. Therefore he first sets down the principle of appearance; second, the lack of existence. The principle of appearance is twofold, that is, the authority of the philosophers—and as to this he says "according to the tradition of men," that is, according to what some have handed down by their own reasoning. Ps. 93:11: "the Lord knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain." The other is the invention of reason, namely when someone wishes to measure the things that belong to faith according to the principles of things and not according to divine wisdom. For by this many are deceived. And therefore he says "according to the elements of the world," etc. Wis. 13:1: "nor by attending to the works did they know who the craftsman was," etc. For the higher a cause is, the more elevated an effect it has. Hence whoever wishes to consider higher effects according to lower causes is deceived; as if someone should consider the motion of water according to the power of water, he cannot know the cause of the ebbing of the sea, but he can, if he considers it according to the power of the moon. Hence much more is he deceived who considers the proper effects of God according to the elements of the world. And this is the cause of the appearance. But are the traditions of men and their reasonings always to be rejected? I answer: no, but only when physical reasoning proceeds according to them, and not according to Christ. Below, in the same [chapter]: "not holding the head, from which the whole body, supplied and joined together through ligaments and joints, grows with the increase of God." Or it can be explained "according to the elements of the world," namely by measuring the truth of faith according to the truth of creatures. Or he says this on account of idolaters who worship idols, calling the sky Jove. Or according to the Jews, so that the sense is "through philosophy," that is, through the reasoning of those wishing to draw people to legal observances, "according to the elements of the world," that is, according to bodily observances. Gal. 4:3: "we were serving under the elements of the world." But the first exposition is better. Then when he says "because in him," etc., he sets down the reason for the foregoing, saying: whatever is not according to Christ is to be rejected. But is Christ so great that for his sake all things ought to be rejected? And he answers that indeed so; which he shows in three ways: first by comparison to the divinity; second by comparison to the faithful, at the place "and you are"; third by comparison to the Angels, at the place "who is the head." He says therefore: what is against him is to be rejected for this reason, that he himself is God. Hence one must stand by him more than by all, because "in him dwells," etc. For God is in all things, but in some by participation in the likeness of his goodness, as in a stone and other such things. And such things are not God, but have in themselves something of God; not his substance, but a likeness of his goodness. And therefore the fullness of divinity does not dwell in them, because it is not there according to substance. Likewise he is in holy minds through operation, which through love and knowledge attain to God. And therefore God is in them according to grace, but not bodily, but according to the effect of grace; nor is it the fullness, but according to certain limited effects. But in Christ he is bodily, which is explained in three ways. For "body" is divided against "shadow." Below, in the same [chapter]: "which are a shadow of things to come," etc. And thus it happens that God dwells in two ways, either according to shadow, or bodily, that is, really. In the first way he dwelt in the old law, but in Christ he dwelt bodily, that is, really and according to truth. It is explained in a second way, because the other saints are indwelt only according to the soul, not according to the body. Rom. 7:18: "I know that good does not dwell in me," that is, in my flesh; but in Christ divinity dwells bodily: because the indwelling of God, by which he indwells the saints, is through operation, that is, through love and knowledge, which is the work of the rational mind alone; but in Christ he dwells through the assumption of man into the unity of person. Hence whatever pertains to man is wholly indwelt by God: and therefore flesh and mind are indwelt, because both are united to the Word. John 1:14: "and the Word was made flesh." But there is a third way of the sense. For God is in things in three ways: one is common, through power, presence, and essence; another is through grace in the saints; the third mode is singular, in Christ, through union. Now a body has three dimensions. And the fullness of divinity, in these modes, superabounds in Christ; therefore it is said to be in him bodily. And the first mode indeed is as it were length, because it extends itself to all things; likewise breadth is through charity; likewise as to depth, it is incomprehensible. But from this Nestorius errs, saying that the union was made only through indwelling, saying that the Word dwelt in the flesh. But against this is what the Apostle says, Phil. 2:7: "he emptied himself," etc. But to dwell in man is not to empty oneself, but to become man; and he adds: "made in the likeness of men," and therefore Christ is called habitable, not as though he who dwells and he who is indwelt were different, but he himself is both man and God, in whom the fullness of divinity dwells. Then when he says "and you are in him," etc., he shows the same thing by comparison to others. As if to say: you have received all things. John 1:16: "of his fullness," etc. Now it should be known that the Platonists say that divine gifts come to men through the mediation of separate substances. And this is true also according to Dionysius, but this is something special, because it comes immediately from him who fills the Angels. John 1:18: "the only-begotten Son of God, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared," etc. Heb. 2:3: "when it had received a beginning to be declared through the Lord, from those who heard it," etc. And therefore he says "who is the head of all principality and power," insofar as he is their king and lord, not through conformity of nature, for in that way he is the head of men. And he touches upon these orders, which seem to have a certain preeminence.”

“Beware lest any man spoil you,.... Or despoil you; rob you of the rich treasure of the Gospel, strip you of your spiritual armour, take away from you the truths and doctrines of Christ, and divest you of your spiritual privileges and blessings; suggesting, that the false teachers were thieves and robbers, and men of prey: or drive and carry you away as spoils, as the innocent harmless sheep are drove, and carried away by wolves, and by the thief that comes to steal, to kill, and destroy; intimating, that such as these were the heretics of those times; wherefore it became them to be upon their guard, to watch, look out, and beware, lest they should be surprised by these deceitful workers, who lay in wait to deceive; were wolves in sheep's clothing, who transformed themselves into the apostles of Christ; and therefore it became them to take heed, lest any man hurt them, be he ever so wise and learned, or be thought ever so good, religious, and sincere; since men of this cast put on such masks and false appearances, on purpose to beguile. The things by which they imposed upon weak minds are as follow, and therefore to be shunned, avoided, and rejected: through philosophy: not right philosophy, or true wisdom, the knowledge of God, of the things of nature, of things natural, moral, and civil; which may be attained unto by the use of reason, and light of nature. The apostle does not mean to condemn all arts and sciences, as useless and hurtful, such as natural philosophy in its various branches, ethics, logic, rhetoric, &c. when kept within due bounds, and in their proper place and sphere; for with instances of these the Scriptures themselves abound; but he means that philosophy, or science, which is falsely so called, the false notions of philosophers; such as the eternity of matter, and of this world, the mortality of souls, the worshipping of demons and angels, &c. and also such principles in philosophy, which in themselves, and in the things of nature, are true, but, when applied to divine things, to things above nature, the mere effects of divine power and grace, and of pure revelation, are false; as that out of nothing, nothing can be made, which in the things of nature is true, but not to be applied to the God of nature, who has made the world out of nothing; as also that from a privation to an habit there is no return, which is naturally true, but not to be applied to supernatural things, and supernatural agency; witness the miracles of Christ, in restoring sight to the blind, life to the dead, &c. and therefore is not to be employed against the resurrection of the dead: philosophy may be useful as an handmaid; it is not to be a mistress in theological things; it may subserve, but not govern; it is not to be made use of as a judge, or rule in such matters; the natural man, on these principles, neither knows nor receives the things of the Spirit of God; judgment is not to be made and formed according to them; as of a trinity of persons in the Godhead; of the sonship of Christ, and his incarnation; of man's redemption by him, of reconciliation and satisfaction by his blood and sacrifice, of the pardon of sin, of a sinner's justification, of the resurrection of the dead, and such like articles of faith: that philosophy which is right, can only be a rule of judgment in things relating to it, and not in those which are out of its sphere: in a word, the apostle here condemns the philosophy of the Jews, and of the Gnostics; the former had introduced natural philosophy into the worship and service of God, and the things appertaining to their religion; and had made the tabernacle and temple, and the most holy place, and the things belonging thereunto, emblems and hieroglyphics of natural things; as of the sun, moon, and stars, and their influences, and of the four elements, and of moral virtue, &c. as appears from the writings of Josephus (r), and Philo (s); when they were types and representatives of spiritual things under the Gospel dispensation; and the latter had brought in the philosophy of Pythagoras and Plato, concerning abstinences, purgations, sacrifices, and ceremonies of worship, given to demons and angels: in short, the apostle's meaning is, that philosophy is not to be mixed with the pure Gospel of Christ; it has always been fatal to it; witness the school of Pantaenus in Alexandria, in the early times of Christianity, by which the simplicity of the Gospel was greatly corrupted; and the race of schoolmen a few centuries ago, who introduced the philosophy of Aristotle, Averrois, and others, into all the subjects of divinity: to observe no more, such kind of philosophy is here meant, which may be truly called vain deceit: that is, that which is vain and empty, and has no solid foundation, even in nature and reason itself; and which being applied to divine things and religious observances, is deceitful and delusory: after the tradition of men; either of the Gentiles, who had their traditions in religion; or of the Jews, called the traditions of the elders, and of the fathers, which the Pharisees were fond of, by which they transgressed the commandments of God; which the apostle was brought up in, and was zealous of formerly, but now was delivered from, and rightly condemned as idle, trifling, and pernicious: after the rudiments of the world, or "the elements of the world"; not the four elements of earth, air, fire, and water; or the worship of the sun, moon, and stars, &c. among the idolatrous Gentiles, but the ceremonial laws of the Jews; see Gal 4:8; which were that to them in religion, as the A B C, or letters, are in grammar, the elements and rudiments of it; and though these were to them, when children, useful, but now under the Gospel dispensation are weak, beggarly, and useless, and not to be attended to: and not after Christ; what he has taught and prescribed, the doctrines and commandments of Christ, the treasures of wisdom and knowledge which are in him; and therefore all such vain and deceitful philosophy, human traditions, and worldly rudiments, are to be rejected; Christ and his Gospel, the revelation he has made, are the standard of doctrine and worship; he only is to be heard and attended to, and whatever it contrary thereunto is to be guarded against, (r) Antiqu. l. 3. c. 6. sect. 4. 7. (s) De Congressu quaerend. Erud. p. 440. 441. de Vita Mosis, l. 3. p. 665, &c. quod deterius pot. p. 184.”

“Beware lest any man spoil you - The word συλαγωγων, from συλη, prey, and αγειν, to lead or carry away, signifies to rob, or spoil of their goods, as if by violence or rapine. Their goods were the salvation they had received from Christ; and both the Gentile and Jewish teachers endeavored to deprive them of these, by perverting their minds, and leading them off from the truths of Christianity. Philosophy and vain deceit - Or, the vain or empty deceit of philosophy; such philosophizing as the Jewish and Gentile teachers used. As the term philosophy stood in high repute among the Gentiles, the Jews of this time affected it; and both Philo and Josephus use the word to express the whole of the Mosaic institutions. So the former: Ὁι κατα Μωσην φιλοσοφουντες· "Those who embraced the philosophy of Moses;" Phil., De Nomin. Mutand. And the latter; Τρια παρα Ιουδαιοις ειδη φιλοσοφειται· "There are three systems of philosophy among the Jews," (Bell. Jud., lib. ii. cap 8, sec. 2), meaning the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes, as immediately follows. The Jewish philosophy, such as is found in the Cabala, Midrashim, and other works, deserves the character of vain deceit, in the fullest sense and meaning of the words. The inspired writers excepted, the Jews have ever been the most puerile, absurd, and ridiculous reasoners in the world. Even Rabbi Maymon, or Maimonides, the most intelligent of them all, is often in his master piece (the Moreh Nevochim, the Teacher of the Perplexed) most deplorably empty and vain. After the rudiments of the world - According to the doctrine of the Jewish teachers; or, according to the Mosaic institutions, as explained and glossed by the scribes, Pharisees, and rabbins in general. We have often seen that העולם הזה haolam hazzeh, this world, of which του κοσμου τουτου is a literal translation, is frequently used to express the Jewish system of rites, ceremonies, and institutions in general; what the apostle calls the tradition of men, namely, what men, unauthorized by God, have taught as doctrines received from him. Our Lord frequently refers to and condemns these traditions. Not after Christ - Not according to the simple doctrine of Christ, viz.: He died for our offenses; believe on the Lord Jesus, and thou shalt be saved.”

“Lest any man impose upon you. [2] In the Greek, make a prey of you, as thieves that steal things. — There were two sorts of false teachers among them; they who mixed vain errors from heathen philosophy with the principles of the Christian religion, and they who had been Jews, and were for making them retain those rites and customs which the Jews had among them, and were only from their private human traditions. (Witham) This alludes to the traditions and observances which the Pharisees had added to the law of Moses, and which Christ had blamed; but which these false apostles wished to introduce amongst the Colossians. The ceremonial laws were the elementary instructions given by God to the world, but we are to attach ourselves to the doctrines of Jesus Christ, from whom alone we expect light and justice, and sanctity. (Bible de Vence) — According to the rudiments of the world: by which some expound vain fallacies and false maxims of the first kind of teachers; others the Jewish ceremonies, which are called weak and poor elements, or rudiments. (Galatians iv. 9.) This is neither to condemn in general the use of philosophy, which St. Augustine commends, and made use of, nor all traditions delivered by the apostles. See 1 Corinthians xi. and 2. Thessalonians ii. 14. (Witham)”

“Translate, "Beware (literally, 'Look' well) lest there shall be (as I fear there is: the Greek indicative expresses this) any man (pointing to some known emissary of evil, Gal 1:7) leading you away as his spoil (not merely gaining spoil out of you, but making yourselves his spoil) through (by means of) his philosophy," &c. The apostle does not condemn all philosophy, but "the philosophy" (so Greek) of the Judaic-oriental heretics at Colosse, which afterwards was developed into Gnosticism. You, who may have "the riches of full assurance" and "the treasures of wisdom," should not suffer yourselves to be led away as a spoil by empty, deceitful philosophy: "riches" are contrasted with spoil; "full" with "vain," or empty (Col 2:2-3, Col 2:9). after--"according to." tradition of men--opposed to, "the fulness of the Godhead." Applied to Rabbinical traditions, Mar 7:8. When men could not make revelation even seem to tell about deep mysteries which they were curious to pry into, they brought in human philosophy and pretended traditions to help it, as if one should bring a lamp to the sundial to find the hour [Cauations for Times, p. 85]. The false teachers boasted of a higher wisdom in theory, transmitted by tradition among the initiated; in practice they enjoined asceticism, as though matter and the body were the sources of evil. Phrygia (in which was Colosse) had a propensity for the mystical and magical, which appeared in their worship of Cybele and subsequent Montanism [NEANDER]. rudiments of the world--(See on Gal 4:3). "The rudiments" or elementary lessons "of the (outward) world," such as legal ordinances; our Judaic childhood's lessons (Col 2:11, Col 2:16, Col 2:20; Gal 4:1-3). But NEANDER, "the elements of the world," in the sense, what is earthly, carnal and outward, not "the rudiments of religion," in Judaism and heathenism. not after Christ--"Their" boasted higher "philosophy" is but human tradition, and a cleaving to the carnal and worldly, and not to Christ. Though acknowledging Christ nominally, in spirit they by their doctrine deny Him.”