The interpretation timeline
Ephesians 2:3 Douay-Rheims

In which also we all conversed in time past, in the desires of our flesh, fulfilling the will of the flesh and of our thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest:

A.D. 220 – 1871 10 witnesses 14 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“As a Jew Paul had been one of the "children of unbelief" in whom "the devil was at work," especially when he persecuted the church and the Christ of the Creator. On this account he says, "We were by nature children of wrath." But he says "by nature" so that a heretic could not argue that it was the Lord who created evil. We create the grounds for the Creator's wrath ourselves.”
Source
“" In perfect agreement with reason was that indignation which resulted from his desire to maintain discipline and order. When, however, he says, "We were formerly the children of wrath," he censures an irrational irascibility, such as proceeds not from that nature which is the production of God, but from that which the devil brought in, who is himself styled the lord or "master" of his own class, "Ye cannot serve two masters," and has the actual designation of "father: ""Ye are of your father the devil. " And if so, the apostle too was in error when he said in his epistle, "Ye were at one time darkness, (but now are ye light in the Lord: )" and, "We also were by nature children of wrath; " and, "Such were some of you, but ye are washed.”
Source
“But the apostle, too, had lived in Judaism; and when he parenthetically observed of the sins (of that period of his life), "in which also we all had our conversation in times past," he must not be understood to indicate that the Creator was the lord of sinful men, and the prince of this air; but as meaning that in his Judaism he had been one of the children of disobedience, having the devil as his instigator-when he persecuted the church and the Christ of the Creator. For when (the apostle) says," We were by nature the children of wrath," inasmuch as the Jews were not the Creator's children by nature, but by the election of their fathers, he (must have) referred their being children of wrath to nature, and not to the Creator, adding this at lasts" even as others," who, of course, were not children of God.”
Source
“Similarly, too, (when writing) to the Ephesians, while recalling past (deeds), he warns (them) concerning the future: "In which we too had our conversation, doing the concupiscences and pleasures of the flesh." Branding, in fine, such as had denied themselves-Christians, to wit-on the score of having "delivered themselves up to the working of every impunity," "But ye," he says, "not so have learnt Christ.”
Source
395
A.D.
Gregory of Nyssa Patristic
c. A.D. 335–395
“When [Scripture] speaks of "sons of men" or "sons of rams," it indicates an essential relation between the one begotten and the source of his begetting. But when it speaks of "sons of power" [as at 1 Sam 14:52] or "children of wrath," it asserts a connection made by choice.”
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"In the lusts of our flesh, doing the desires of the flesh, and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest." That is, having no spiritual affections. Yet, lest he should slander the flesh, or lest it should be supposed that the transgression was not great, observe how he guards the matter, "Doing," he says, "the desires of the flesh and of the mind." That is, the pleasurable passions. We provoked God to anger, he saith, we provoked Him to wrath, we were wrath, and nothing else. For as he who is a child of man is by nature man, so also were we children of wrath even as others; i. e., no one was free, but we all did things worthy of wrath.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“We speak of "nature" in two ways. When we are speaking strictly of nature itself, we mean the nature in which humanity was originally created—after God's own image and without fault. The other way we speak of nature refers to that fallen sin nature, in which we are self-deceived and subject to the flesh as the penalty for our condemnation. The apostle adopts this way of speaking when he says "for we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest."”
Source
“What then is meant by this wickedness of the natural man and of those who … "by nature" are children of wrath? Could this possibly be the nature created in Adam? That created nature was debased in him. It has run and is running its course now through everyone by nature, so that nothing frees us from condemnation except the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above, the Apostle enumerated the benefits shown to the human race in common through Christ; here the Apostle recalls the same benefits by comparison to their past condition. Now their past condition can be considered in two ways. First, as to the condition of guilt; second, as to their condition of gentileness. The Apostle therefore does two things: first he recalls the benefits shown to them as regards the first condition; second he recalls them by comparison to the second condition, at the words for which cause be mindful, etc. The first is again divided into two, because first the Apostle recounts their condition of guilt; second the benefit of the grace of justification, at the words but God, who is rich, etc. The first is again divided into two, because first he recalls the condition of guilt as regards the Gentiles; second as regards the Jews, at the words among whom also we all, etc. The first is again divided into two, because first he sets forth the generality of the benefit; second he adds the necessity of this benefit, at the words when we were dead, etc. He says therefore: I say that God works magnificently in the faithful according to the working of the might of his power, which he wrought in Christ, and this because he raised him from the dead; according to this working, then, in the likeness of this working he has made us alive together, that is, with the life of grace out of the death of sin. Hosea 6:3: he will revive us after two days, on the third day he will raise us up, etc. Colossians 3:1: if you have risen together with Christ, seek the things that are above, etc. He shows the necessity of this benefit when he says when you were dead, etc., where he describes their guilt most excellently. First as to its multitude, because when you were dead, namely with a spiritual death, which is the worst. Psalm 33:22: the death of sinners is the worst. For sin is called death, because through it man is separated from the Lord, who is life. John 14:6: I am the way, the truth, and the life. Dead, I say, in your offenses and sins — behold the multitude. In offenses indeed as to things omitted, Psalm 18:13: who understands offenses, etc.; and in sins as to things committed. In which you once walked — which he says for this reason, that he might magnify the multitude of sins. For some, if for an hour they are dead in sins and in offenses, nevertheless cease at some point and desist from sinning; but these, proceeding and walking from bad to worse, kept advancing. A similar thing is found in Philippians 3:18: for many walk, of whom I have often told you, and now tell you weeping, etc. Jeremiah 2:5: they walked after their vanity, and became vain. Second, he describes their guilt as to its cause, which is set down as twofold. One is on the part of this world, because they were being enticed by the things of the world. And as to this he says according to the age of this world, that is, according to the worldly life of the things of the world, which entice you. 1 John 2:15: if anyone loves the world, the charity of the Father is not in him. For which reason he had said beforehand: love not the world. The other cause is on the part of the demons, whom they served, of whom it is said in Wisdom 14:27: the worship of unspeakable idols is the cause and beginning of every evil. And as to this he says and according to the prince of the power. Now he describes this cause in three ways. First indeed as to the power, saying according to the prince of the power, that is, one exercising power — not that he has this naturally, since he is neither lord nor creator by nature, but insofar as he lords it over men who subject themselves to him by sinning. John 12:31: now the prince of this world shall be cast out. And John 14:30: the prince of this world is coming, and in me he has nothing. Second as to habitation, because of this air, that is, one who has power in this murky air. Here it must be known that concerning these demons there is a twofold opinion among the doctors. For some have said that the demons who fell were not of the highest orders, but of the lower ones, which preside over the lower bodies. Now it is agreed that the whole corporeal creature is administered by God through the ministry of angels. And this is the opinion of John Damascene, namely that the first of those who fell presided over the order of earthly things, which perhaps was taken from a saying of Plato, who posited certain celestial or worldly substances. And according to this, what he says of this air is expounded as meaning: created for this, that they might preside over this air. But others hold, and better, that they were of the highest orders, so that what he says of this air serves to show that this very air is their habitation as their punishment. Whence Jude in his canonical epistle says: but the angels who did not keep their own principality, but abandoned their own dwelling, he has kept in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Now the reason why they were not thrust down into hell immediately after their fall, but are left in the air, is that God did not wish that, through their sinning, their creation should be entirely frustrated; and therefore he gave them over to men as a training-ground, whereby they might prepare a crown for the good, but eternal death for the wicked. And because until the day of judgment there is for us a time of war and of meriting, therefore they will remain in the air until then; but after the day of judgment they will be thrust down into hell. It must also be noted that one reading has spirits (spiritus), and thus it is of the genitive case, and the singular is put for the plural, as if to say: of the spirits. Another reading has spirit (spiritum), and then it is of the accusative case, so that it would read: according to the prince spirit, that is, who is prince of spirit. Third as to operation, where he says who now works in the sons of unbelief, that is, in those who repel from themselves the fruit of the passion of Christ, who were sons of unbelief. Or because they have no faith concerning eternal things, nor hope of salvation through Christ: and in such men the prince of the power of this air works freely, leading them where he wills, of whom it is said below, chapter 4:19: who, despairing, have given themselves up to lasciviousness, unto the working of all uncleanness. Or unbelief, that is, of those concerning whom one must be diffident, that is, who sin out of malice, in whom the prince of this world also works at his beck and call. For concerning those who sin out of ignorance and weakness, one is not to despair, nor does that prince work in them at his beck and call. But against this: no one is to be despaired of as long as he lives. I answer. It must be said that concerning anyone there can be a twofold hope: one on the part of man, the other on the part of divine grace. And thus concerning someone one may despair on his own part, of whom nevertheless one must not despair on the part of God — just as it was to be despaired of, on his own part, that Lazarus lying in the tomb would rise again, though it was not to be despaired of on the part of God, by whom he was raised up. Concerning those, then, who out of malice are much sunk down in sins, if their own strength be regarded, one may despair — Psalm 68:3: I am stuck in the mire of the deep, and there is no sure standing — yet not if the divine power be regarded. Concerning these sons of unbelief it is said below, chapter 5:6: let no man deceive you with vain words. For because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of unbelief. Then, when he says among whom we also all, etc., the Apostle recalls the condition of guilt as regards the Jews, showing that they all had been in sin, according to that saying in Romans 3:9: we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin. Yet a difference must be noted here, because the Apostle, treating of the guilt of the Gentiles, assigned two causes of guilt to have existed: one on the part of the world, the other on the part of the demons, whom they worshipped. Because, then, the Jews were like the Gentiles in the condition of guilt as regards the first cause, but not as regards the second, therefore the Apostle makes no mention of their guilt except as regards the cause which is on the part of the world. Concerning this he does three things. First he recalls their guilt as to the sin of the heart; second as to the sin of deed; third as to the sin of origin. Now he intimates the sin of the heart through the desires of the flesh, and as to this he says among whom, namely the sins or offenses, we all, namely the Jews, once had our conversation, leading our life, in the desires of our flesh, that is, of carnal things. Titus 3:3: for we also were sometime foolish and unbelieving, erring and serving divers desires and pleasures, etc. Romans 13:14: make not provision for the flesh in its desires. Now the sin of deed is nothing other than the expression of interior concupiscence. Now there is a certain concupiscence of the flesh, such as the natural concupiscences, for instance that of food, whereby the individual is preserved, and that of venereal things, whereby the species is preserved; and as to this he says doing the will, etc., that is, those things in which the flesh takes delight. Romans 8:8: now they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But there is another, a concupiscence of the cognitive power, namely of those things which do not come from the desires of the flesh, but from the very appetite of the soul, such as ambition for honor and for one's own excellence, and the like; and as to this he says and of the thoughts, that is, carrying out those concupiscences which are caused by the instinct of our thoughts. Now he intimates the sin of origin, saying and we were by nature children of wrath. This sin indeed is transfused from the first parent not only into the Gentiles, but also into the Jews. Romans 5:12: as by one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death; and so death passed upon all men, in whom all have sinned. And just as men are cleansed of original sin through baptism only as regards their own persons, whence they beget sons who must be baptized, so circumcision cleansed from the original only the persons themselves, but they still begot children who had to be circumcised. And this is what he says we were by nature, that is, through the origin of nature — not indeed of nature as nature is, since as such it is good and from God, but of nature as it is vitiated — children of wrath, that is, of vengeance, of punishment, and of Gehenna, and this even as the rest also, that is, the Gentiles.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past,.... What the apostle says of the Gentile Ephesians before conversion, he says of himself and other Jews; and this he does, partly to show that it was not from ill will, or with a design to upbraid the Gentiles, that he said what he did; and partly to beat down the pride of the Jews, who thought themselves better than the sinners of the Gentiles; as well as to magnify the grace of God in the conversion of them both: the sense is, that the apostle and other Jews in the time of their unregeneracy, had their conversation according to the customs of the world, and to the prince of the air, and among unbelievers, as well as the Gentiles; and that they were equally sinners, and lived a like sinful course of life: in the lusts of our flesh; by "flesh" is meant, the corruption of nature; so called, because it is propagated by natural generation; and is opposed to the Spirit, or principle of grace; and has for its object fleshly things; and discovers itself mostly in the body, the flesh; and it makes persons carnal or fleshly: and this is called "our", because it belongs to human nature, and is inherent in it, and inseparable from it in this life: and the "lusts" of it, are the inward motions of it, in a contrariety to the law and will of God; and are various, and are sometimes called fleshly and worldly lusts, and the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life: and persons may be said to have their conversations in these, when these are the ground of their conversation, when they are solicitous about them, and make provision for the fulfilling of them, and constantly employ themselves in obedience to them, as follows: fulfilling the desires of the flesh, and of the mind: or the wills of them; what they incline to, will, and crave after: various are the degrees of sin, and its several motions; and universal is the corruption of human nature; not only the body, and the several members of it, are defiled with sin, and disposed to it, but all the powers and faculties of the soul; even the more noble and governing ones, the mind, understanding, and will, as well as the affections; and great is the power and influence which lust has over them: and were by nature children of wrath, even as others: by which is meant, not only that they were wrathful persons, living in malice, hateful, and hating one another; but that they were deserving of the wrath of God, which comes upon the children of disobedience, among whom they had their conversation; and which is revealed from heaven against such sins as they were guilty of, though they were not appointed to it: and they were such "by nature"; really, and not in opinion, and by and from their first birth: so a Jewish commentator (s) on these words, "thy first father hath sinned", Isa 43:27 has this note; "how canst thou say thou hast not sinned? and behold thy first father hath sinned, and he is the first man, for man , "is naturally in sin";'' or by nature a sinner, or sin is naturally impressed in him; and hence being by nature a sinner, he is by nature deserving of the wrath of God, as were the persons spoken of: even as others; as the rest of the world, Jews as well as Gentiles; and Gentiles are especially designed, in distinction from the Jews, the apostle is speaking of; and who are particularly called in the Jewish dialect "others"; See Gill on Luk 18:11. (s) Kimchi in loc.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Among whom also we all had our conversation - We Jews, as well as you Gentiles, have lived in transgressions and sins; ανεστραφημεν, this was the course of our life; we lived in sin, walked in sin, it was woven through our whole constitution, it tinged every temper, polluted every faculty, and perverted every transaction of life. The lusts - the evil, irregular, and corrupt affections of the heart, showed themselves in the perversion of the mind as well as in our general conduct. The mind was darkened by the lusts of the flesh, and both conjoined to produce acts of unrighteousness. It was not the will of God that was done by us, but the will of the flesh and of the mind. And were by nature the children of wrath - For the import of the phrase, by nature, φυσει, see the note on Gal 2:15, and Rom 2:14 (note). To what is said on those passages, I may add, from Dr. Macknight: - "Nature often signifies one's birth and education, Gal 2:15 : We, who are Jews By Nature. Also, men's natural reason and conscience, Rom 2:14 : The Gentiles who have not the law, do By Nature the things contained in the law, etc. Also, the general sense and practice of mankind, Co1 11:14 : Doth not even Nature itself teach you, that if a man have long hair, etc. Also, the original constitution of any thing, Gal 4:8 : Who are not gods By Nature, Also, a disposition formed by custom and habit; thus Demetrius Phalereus said of the Lacedemonians: φυσει εβραχυλογουν Λακωνες· The Lacedemonians had naturally a concise mode of speaking. Hence our word laconic; a short speech, or much sense conveyed in a few words." The words in the text have often been quoted to prove the doctrine of original sin, but, though that doctrine be an awful truth, it is not, in my opinion, intended here; it is rather found in the preceding words, the lusts of the flesh, and the desires of the flesh and of the mind. The apostle appears to speak of sinful habits; and as we say Habit is a second nature, and as these persons acted from their originally corrupt nature - from the lusts of the flesh and of the mind, they thus became, by their vicious habits, or second nature, children of wrath - persons exposed to perdition, because of the impurity of their hearts and the wickedness of their lives. Here we see that the fallen, apostate nature produces the fruits of unrighteousness. The bad tree produces bad fruit. Children of wrath is the same as son of perdition, son of death, etc.; i.e. persons exposed to God's displeasure, because of their sins.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Among whom, &c. St. Jerome (p. 3) refers it to trespasses or sins. — Were by nature; not by nature according to the state of man’s first creation in paradise, but by nature infected with original sin by the fall of our first parents. — Even as the rest; that is, all mankind. (Witham)”
1871
A.D.
1871
“also we--that is, we also. Paul here joins himself in the same category with them, passing from the second person (Eph 2:1-2) to the first person here. all--Jews and Gentiles. our conversation--"our way of life" (Co2 1:12; Pe1 1:18). This expression implies an outwardly more decorous course, than the open "walk" in gross sins on the part of the majority of Ephesians in times past, the Gentile portion of whom may be specially referred to in Eph 2:2. Paul and his Jewish countrymen, though outwardly more seemly than the Gentiles (Act 26:4-5, Act 26:18), had been essentially like them in living to the unrenewed flesh, without the Spirit of God. fulfilling--Greek, doing. mind--Greek, "our thoughts." Mental suggestions and purposes (independent of God), as distinguished from the blind impulses of "the flesh." and were by nature--He intentionally breaks off the construction, substituting "and we were" for "and being," to mark emphatically his and their past state by nature, as contrasted with their present state by grace. Not merely is it, we had our way of life fulfilling our fleshly desires, and so being children of wrath; but we were by nature originally "children of wrath," and so consequently had our way of life fulfilling our fleshly desires. "Nature," in Greek, implies that which has grown in us as the peculiarity of our being, growing with our growth, and strengthening with our strength, as distinguished from that which has been wrought on us by mere external influences: what is inherent, not acquired (Job 14:4; Psa 51:5). An incidental proof of the doctrine of original sin. children of wrath--not merely "sons," as in the Greek, "sons of disobedience" (Eph 2:2), but "children" by generation; not merely by adoption, as "sons" might be. The Greek order more emphatically marks this innate corruption: "Those who in their (very) nature are children of wrath"; Eph 2:5, "grace" is opposed to "nature" here; and salvation (implied in Eph 2:5, Eph 2:8, "saved") to "wrath." Compare Article IX, Church of England Common Prayer Book. "Original sin (birth-sin), standeth not in the following of Adam, but is the fault and corruption of the nature of every man, naturally engendered of Adam [Christ was supernaturally conceived by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin], whereby man is very far gone from original righteousness, and is of his own nature inclined to evil; and therefore, in every person born into this world, it deserveth God's wrath and damnation." Paul shows that even the Jews, who boasted of their birth from Abraham, were by natural birth equally children of wrath as the Gentiles, whom the Jews despised on account of their birth from idolaters (Rom 3:9; Rom 5:12-14). "Wrath abideth" on all who disobey the Gospel in faith and practice (Joh 3:36). The phrase, "children of wrath," is a Hebraism, that is, objects of God's wrath from childhood, in our natural state, as being born in the sin which God hates. So "son of death" (Sa2 12:5, Margin); "son of perdition" (Joh 17:12; Th2 2:3). as others--Greek, "as the rest" of mankind are (Th1 4:13).”
Source

Undated

date unknown
date
unknown
“Undoubtedly the will passes for nature—for it is from their will, not their nature, that people are judged. Similarly all the martyrs and the justified are upright not because they were born faithful but because they were reborn so.”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.