The interpretation timeline
Isaiah 19:18 Douay-Rheims

In that day there shall be five cities in the land of Egypt, speaking the language of Chanaan, and swearing by the Lord of hosts: one shall be called the city of the sun.

1105 – 1875 8 witnesses

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1105
A.D.
Rashi Jewish
1040–1105
“On that day there shall be five cities, etc. We learned in Seder Olam (ch. 23): Following Sennacherib’s defeat, Hezekiah stood up and released the armies he had brought with him from Egypt and from Cush in chains before Jerusalem, and they imposed upon themselves the kingdom of heaven, and returned to their place, and it is said: “On that day there shall be five cities, etc.” They went and built an altar to the Lord in the land of Egypt and they would sacrifice on it to heaven, to fulfill what was said: On that day there shall be an altar to the Lord in the land of Egypt. Some of our Sages expounded it in the tractate Menahoth (109b) as referring to the altar of the temple of Onias the son of Simon the Just, who fled to Egypt and built an altar there. speaking the language of Canaan like the Israelites in the land of Canaan. one of which will be called “the city of Heres.” Jonathan paraphrases: The city of Beth-shemesh which is destined to be destroyed will be said to be one of them. Jonathan renders “Heres” in two ways: an expression related to (Job 9:7) “Who says to the sun (לַחֶרֶס) and it will not shine,” [הֶרֶס and חֶרֶס being interchangeable since ‘heh’ and ‘heth’ are both gutterals,] and an expression of demolition and destruction. (Some editions add:) And whence did Jonathan derive this? From Jeremiah’s prophecy, which he prophesied in Tahpanhes (43:13): “He shall also break the monuments of Beth shemesh which is in the land of Egypt.” We learn from here that Beth-shemesh that was in the land of Egypt [and the monument] was destined to be destroyed, and the monuments mentioned there are identical with “the monument beside its border, to the Lord,” mentioned here, and it may be said that Beth-shemesh was situated in the border of Egypt on the boundary. Therefore it is stated: Beside its border.”
Source
1167
A.D.
Ibn Ezra Jewish
1089–1167
“The language of Canaan. We may learn from this that the Canaanites spoke the holy language. עיר ההרס The name of a town. It is surprising how people can confound ה with ח ..(ההרס with החרס)”
1256
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“The burden of Egypt. In this part he threatens the destruction of the Egyptians, following out its manner and order; and it is divided into three parts: first, the preparation of the punishment is described; in the second, the destruction itself, at "and I will deliver Egypt"; in the third, the resulting benefit, at "in that day there shall be five cities." Now the preparation of the punishment is described as to four things. First, as to the disposition of the enemies: "he shall ascend" — by inspiring — "upon a cloud," from which comes the storm; "light," on account of agility and readiness: Ps. 96: "cloud and darkness are round about him." Second, as to the stupefaction of the ruling gods. "And they shall be moved": because they were broken by the Assyrians; or because they were not able to give an answer; or because they did not even appear to man on that same day. Ez. 6: "they shall be broken," etc. "The heart of Egypt," that is, the king and the princes, from whom all the vigor of Egypt comes. Above, 1: "every head is languishing, and every heart sad." Third, as to the dissension of those resisting: as to outward engagement, "to clash"; as to strangers, "the Egyptians"; as to kinsmen, "man shall fight"; as to acquaintances and friends, "and man against his friend"; as to different peoples, "city." He sets down the diversity of wills: "it shall be broken up," that is, divided, "the spirit," that is, the will, "in its bowels," that is, in the inhabitants of the land. Matt. 12: "every kingdom divided against itself shall be made desolate." Fourth, as to the error of men taking counsel: "and the counsel." Job 5: "he catches the wise in their own craftiness, and scatters the counsel of the wicked" — and of the demons: "and they shall inquire" — in vain. Above, 8: "and when they shall say to you: seek unto pythons, and unto wizards who mutter in their enchantments," etc. Note, concerning that word "upon a cloud," that there is a manifold cloud. The first is of the flesh assumed. Job 38: "Where were you when I made a cloud its garment, and wrapped it in darkness as in swaddling clothes of infancy?" The second is of the virginal womb. 3 Kings 18: "Behold a little cloud arose out of the sea." The third is of the devout mind. Ps. 67: "His magnificence and his power are in the clouds." The fourth is of the seat of judgment. Ps. 96: "Cloud and darkness are round about him; justice and judgment are the preparation of his seat." Also note that from the first cloud proceeds the sacramental or sanctifying rain. John 19: "from the side (of the Lord) immediately came out blood and water." From the second proceeds the food of consolation. Wis. 19: "the cloud overshadowed the camp, and out of the water that was before, dry land appeared." And below: "seeing your wonders and marvels: for like horses they fed on the food." Above, 18: "like a cloud of dew." From the third proceeds the flashing of preaching. Job 37: "the clouds long for the grain, the clouds scatter their light." From the fourth proceeds the storm of damnation. (Jer. 4): "behold as a cloud"; Ps. 67: "his power is in the clouds." Also note, concerning that word "a light cloud," that the first is called light on account of the dignity of its eminence. Daniel 7: "behold, one like the son of man came in the clouds." The second is called light on account of the purity of virginity. Apoc. 14: "and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sitting like to the son of man." The third is called light on account of the swiftness of obedience. Below, 60: "who are these that fly as clouds?" The fourth is called light on account of the ease of its execution. Ecclus. 43: "in his greatness he set the clouds, and the stones of hail were broken." "And I will deliver Egypt." Here he pursues the destruction itself: first, as to the servitude of the people; second, as to the desolation of the land, "and it shall be dried up"; third, as to the stupefaction of the wise men, "the princes are fools." "Of masters" — of the Assyrians, the Chaldeans, the Romans. Deut. 28: "you shall serve your enemy." Now he designates the destruction of the land through the dryness of the waters, in which Egypt is adorned and rich: either because the wrath of God brought it about beforehand that the waters should dry up, and the animals die; or he speaks hyperbolically, as if to say: the tribulation will be so great that it will seem even to dry up the waters. He sets down, therefore, three things. First, the manner of the drought: "it shall be dried up," that is, diminished, "the river" — the Nile — "the streams," the other rivers. Ezechiel 30: "I will make the channels of the rivers dry." Second, he sets down the sign of the drought: "the reed and the bulrush," which are nourished in the waters. Below, 35: "the greenness of the reed and the bulrush shall spring up." Third, he sets down the harm of the drought: "it shall be made bare" — first, of agriculture, "from the fountain," that is, from the beginning; or this refers to the end. Ps. 106: "he turned rivers into a desert, and the outgoings of waters into thirst." Second, of the fishermen: "the fishermen shall mourn." Ezech. 29: "I will cast you into the desert, and all the fish of your river." Third, of the various craftsmen: "they shall be confounded who work in flax," which grows in moist places. "Withering," that is, drying up; "ponds," fish-ponds. "The princes are fools." Here he sets down the stupefaction of men: first, as to error in counsels; second, as to fear in wars, at "in that day." Concerning the first, three things. First he mocks the folly of the wise as to deliberation: "the princes are fools" — that is, the philosophers — "of Tanis," where study flourished: Jer. 51: "every man has become foolish"; as to the promulgation of counsel: "the wise"; as to their own self-commendation: "how will you say to Pharaoh?" That is, how will you be able to say, when he will think that you have counseled badly, this thing which each one of you was accustomed to say for his own commendation, so that his counsel might be believed: "I am the son of the wise" — as if to say, I possess wisdom by inheritance; or "a disciple of the kings" — who of old were philosophers. Job 15: "both the aged and ancient men are among us, much elder than your fathers." Second, he mocks the confidence of the king: "Where now?" And first, the question: below, 47: "let them stand and save you"; second, the answer: "the fools have withered away," that is, have failed, as above; third, he mocks the cowardice of the deceived people: "they have deceived." Here he does three things. First he sets down the deception of the wise: "they have deceived the corner," that is, the kingdom, in which many are joined together as walls at a corner. Below, 47: "your wisdom and your knowledge have deceived you." Second, the permission of God: "the Lord has mingled" — this is often said metaphorically. "A spirit of dizziness," that is, of error, after the manner of one who suffers vertigo. 3 Kings, last chapter: "the Lord has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all your prophets." Third, the error of the people itself: "and to err." "Head" — namely, neither as to the beginning; "tail" — neither as to the end; "bowing down" — as to the old man; "holding back" — as to the young man, who needs restraint, or one given to wantonness. 2 Tim. 3: "but evil men and seducers shall grow worse." "In that day." Here he threatens the fear of the strong. And first he sets down the fear: "as women," weak and feeble. Jer. 51: "their strength is devoured, and they have become as women." Second, the reason: "the land of Judah shall be" — namely, the memory of the evils which they did to them, turning them away from the worship of God, on account of which they shall know that they have incurred the wrath of God. 1 Mach. 6: "now I remember the evils that I did in Jerusalem." "In that day." Here the resulting benefit, or consolation, is set down — namely, their conversion. And first, a threefold sign of the conversion: of which the first is the oath, "swearing." Below, 65: "he who swears," etc., "shall swear by the God, Amen: because the former distresses are delivered to oblivion." "The city of the sun" — Heliopolis. "The language of Canaan" — which borders on the language of the Jews, so that they might also agree in language with the people of God. For among these certain Syrians were transplanted by Nebuchadnezzar, who kept their own language. The second sign is a sacred building: "an altar of the Lord, and a monument" — because they worshiped many gods, as is said in Acts 17. This (some say) was fulfilled in the time of the Maccabees, when, many Jews fleeing into Egypt, Onias, wishing to fulfill this prophecy, built an altar against the precept of the Law, which is against that word of Exod. 20: "you shall not build me an altar," etc.; concerning which it is argued in Dan. 11: "the children also of the transgressors of your people shall lift themselves up to fulfill the vision, and they shall fall." Whence it is clear that this is not the meaning, but rather it concerns an altar to be built for Christian worship. The third sign is that they call upon the help of God: "they shall cry out"; "a savior" — Jesus. Ps. 90: "he cried to me." Second, he sets down the manner of the conversion: first, as to the reception of the faith, "and he shall be known": Jer. 31: "all shall know me, from the least even to the greatest, says the Lord"; second, as to the offering of sacrifices and vows, "and they shall worship": Malachi 1: "in every place there is offered to my name a clean oblation"; third, as to the remission of sins: "and he shall strike" — first, through many punishments; "and he shall heal" — from sin. Job 5: "he wounds and cures; he strikes, and his hands shall heal." Third, he sets down the threefold effect of the conversion: namely, peace: "in that day there shall be a way," which before could not be, on account of the different kingdoms, which at the birth of the Lord were joined together under the Romans. "They shall serve" — in trading with one another; or because Syrian soldiers were in the legions of the Romans for the guarding of Egypt. Above, 2: "nation shall not lift up sword against nation." Second, he promises the second effect, the truth of the faith: "in that day the third" — together, and serving the Romans equally, and in unity of faith. John 10: "there shall be one fold and one shepherd." Rom. 10: "there is no distinction of Jew and Greek." Third, he sets down the third effect, namely the divine blessing: "it shall be" — namely, Israel — "a blessing," because through the apostles the whole world received the blessing of God. "An inheritance," because he was born there, and fulfilled the mysteries of our salvation there. Ps. 113: "he blessed the house of Israel."”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1714
A.D.
Matthew Henry Reformed
1662–1714
“Out of the thick and threatening clouds of the foregoing prophecy the sun of comfort here breaks forth, and it is the sun of righteousness. Still God has mercy in store for Egypt, and he will show it, not so much by reviving their trade and replenishing their river again as by bringing the true religion among them, calling them to, and accepting them in, the worship of the one only living and true God; and these blessings of grace were much more valuable than all the blessings of nature wherewith Egypt was enriched. We know not of any event in which this prophecy can be thought to have its full accomplishment short of the conversion of Egypt to the faith of Christ, by the preaching (as is supposed) of Mark the Evangelist, and the founding of many Christian churches there, which flourished for many ages. Many prophecies of this book point to the days of the Messiah; and why not this? It is no unusual thing to speak of gospel graces and ordinances in the language of the Old Testament institutions. And, in these prophecies, those words, in that day, perhaps have not always a reference to what goes immediately before, but have a peculiar significancy pointing at that day which had been so long fixed, and so often spoken of, when the day-spring from on high should visit this dark world. Yet it is not improbable (which some conjecture) that this prophecy was in part fulfilled when those Jews who fled from their own country to take shelter in Egypt, when Sennacherib invaded their land, brought their religion along with them, and, being awakened to great seriousness by the troubles they were in, made an open and zealous profession of it there, and were instrumental to bring many of the Egyptians to embrace it, which was an earnest and specimen of the more plentiful harvest of souls that should be gathered in to God by the preaching of the gospel of Christ. Josephus indeed tells us that Onias the son of Onias the high priest, living an outlaw at Alexandria in Egypt, obtained leave of Ptolemy Philometer, then king, and Cleopatra his queen, to build a temple to the God of Israel, like that at Jerusalem, at Bubastis in Egypt, and pretended a warrant for doing it from this prophecy in Isaiah, that there shall be an altar to the Lord in the land of Egypt; and the service of God, Josephus affirms, continued in it about 333 years, when it was shut up by Paulinus soon after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans; see Antiq. 13.62-79, and Jewish War 7.426-436. But that temple was all along looked upon by the pious Jews as so great an irregularity, and an affront to the temple at Jerusalem, that we cannot suppose this prophecy to be fulfilled in it. Observe how the conversion of Egypt is here described. I. They shall speak the language of Canaan, the holy language, the scripture-language; they shall not only understand it, but use it (Isa 19:18); they shall introduce that language among them, and converse freely with the people of God, and not, as they used to do, by an interpreter, Gen 42:23. Note, Converting grace, by changing the heart, changes the language; for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. Five cities in Egypt shall speak this language; so many Jews shall come to reside in Egypt, and they shall so multiply there, that they shall soon replenish five cities, one of which shall be the city of Heres, or of the sun, Heliopolis, where the sun was worshipped, the most infamous of all the cities of Egypt for idolatry; even there shall be a wonderful reformation, they shall speak the language of Canaan. Or it may be taken thus, as we render it - That for every five cities that shall embrace religion there shall be one (a sixth part of the cities of Egypt) that shall reject it, and that shall be called a city of destruction, because it refuses the methods of salvation. II. They shall swear to the Lord of hosts, not only swear by him, giving him the honour of appealing to him, as all nations did to the gods they worshipped; but they shall by a solemn oath and vow devote themselves to his honour and bind themselves to his service. They shall swear to cleave to him with purpose of heart, and shall worship him, not occasionally, but constantly. They shall swear allegiance to him as their King, to Christ, to whom all judgment is committed. III. They shall set up the public worship of God in their land (Isa 19:19): There shall be an altar to the Lord in the midst of the land of Egypt, an altar on which they shall do sacrifice and oblation (Isa 19:21); therefore it must be understood spiritually. Christ, the great altar, who sanctifies every gift, shall be owned there, and the gospel sacrifices of prayer and praise shall be offered up; for by the law of Moses there was to be no altar for sacrifice but that at Jerusalem. In Christ Jesus all distinction of nations is taken away; and a spiritual altar, a gospel church, in the midst of the land of Egypt, is as acceptable to God as one in the midst of the land of Israel; and spiritual sacrifices of faith and love, and a contrite heart, please the Lord better than an ox or bullock. IV. There shall be a face of religion upon the nation, and an open profession made of it, discernible to all who come among them. Not only in the heart of the country, but even in the borders of it, there shall be a pillar, or pillars, inscribed, To Jehovah, to his honour, as before there had been such pillars set up in honour of false gods. As soon as a stranger entered upon the borders of Egypt he might perceive what God they worshipped. Those that serve God must not be ashamed to own him, but be forward to do any thing that may be for a sign and for a witness to the Lord of hosts. Even in the land of Egypt he had some faithful worshippers, who boasted of their relation to him and made his name their strong tower, or bulwark, on their borders, with which their coasts were fortified against all assailants. V. Being in distress, they shall seek to God, and he shall be found of them; and this shall be a sign and a witness for the Lord of hosts that he is a God hearing prayer to all flesh that come to him, Isa 19:20. See Psa 65:2. When they cry to God by reason of their oppressors, the cruel lords that shall rule over them (Isa 19:4) he shall be entreated of them (Isa 19:22); whereas he had told his people Israel, who had made it their own choice to have such a king, that they should cry to him by reason of their king, and he would not hear them, Sa1 8:18. VI. They shall have an interest in the great Redeemer. When they were under the oppression of cruel lords perhaps God sometimes raised them up mighty deliverers, as he did for Israel in the days of the judges; and by them, though he had smitten the land, he healed it again; and, upon their return to God in a way of duty, he returned to them in a way of mercy, and repaired the breaches of their tottering state. For repenting Egyptians shall find the same favour with God that repenting Ninevites did. But all these deliverances wrought for them, as those for Israel, were but figures of gospel salvation. Doubtless Jesus Christ is the Saviour and the great one here spoken of, whom God will send the glad tidings of to the Egyptians, and by whom he will deliver them out of the hands of their enemies, that they may serve him without fear, Luk 1:74, Luk 1:75. Jesus Christ delivered the Gentile nations from the service of dumb idols, and did himself both purchase and preach liberty to the captives. VII. The knowledge of God shall prevail among them, Isa 19:21. 1. They shall have the means of knowledge. For many ages in Judah only was God known, for there only were the lively oracles found; but now the Lord, and his name and will, shall be known to Egypt. Perhaps this may in part refer to the translation of the Old Testament out of Hebrew into Greek by the Septuagint, which was done at Alexandria in Egypt, by the command of Ptolemy king of Egypt; and it was the first time that the scriptures were translated into any other language. By the help of this (the Grecian monarchy having introduced their language into that country) the Lord was known to Egypt, and a happy omen and means it was of his being further known. 2. They shall have grace to improve those means. It is promised not only that the Lord shall be known to Egypt, but that the Egyptians shall know the Lord; they shall receive and entertain the light granted to them, and shall submit themselves to the power of it. The Lord is known to our nation, and yet I fear there are many of our nation that do not know the Lord. But the promise of the new covenant is that all shall know the Lord, from the least even to the greatest, which promise is sure to all the seed. The effect of this knowledge of God is that they shall vow a vow to the Lord and perform it. For those do not know God aright who either are not willing to come under binding obligations to the Lord or do not make good those obligations. VIII. They shall come into the communion of saints. Being joined to the Lord, they shall be added to the church, and be incorporated with all the saints. 1. All enmities shall be slain. Mortal feuds there had been between Egypt and Assyria; they often made war upon one another; but now there shall be a highway between Egypt and Assyria (Isa 19:23), a happy correspondence settled between he two nations; they shall trade with one another, and every thing that passes between them shall be friendly. The Egyptians shall serve (shall worship the true God) with the Assyrians; and therefore the Assyrians shall come into Egypt and the Egyptians into Assyria. Note, It becomes those who have communion with the same God, through the same Mediator, to keep up an amicable correspondence with one another. The consideration of our meeting at the same throne of grace, and our serving with each other in the same business of religion, should put an end to all heats and animosities, and knit our hearts to each other in holy love. 2. The Gentile nations shall not only unite with each other in the gospel fold under Christ the great shepherd, but they shall all be united with the Jews. When Egypt and Assyria become partners in serving God Israel shall make a third with them (Isa 19:24); they shall become a three-fold cord, not easily broken. The ceremonial law, which had long been the partition-wall between Jews and Gentiles, shall be taken down, and then they shall become one sheep-fold under one shepherd. Thus united, they shall be a blessing in the midst of the land, whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, Isa 19:24, Isa 19:25. (1.) Israel shall be a blessing to them all, because of them, as concerning the flesh, Christ came, and they were the natural branches of the good olive, to whom did originally pertain its root and fatness, and the Gentiles were but grafted in among them, Rom 11:17. Israel lay between Egypt and Assyria, and was a blessing to them both by bringing them to meet in that word of the Lord which went forth from Jerusalem, and that church which was first set up in the land of Israel. Qui conveniunt in aliquo tertio inter se conveniunt - Those who meet in a third meet in each other. Israel is that third in whom Egypt and Assyria agree, and is therefore a blessing; for those are real and great blessings to their generation who are instrumental to unite those that have been at variance. (2.) They shall all be a blessing to the world: so the Christian church is, made up of Jews and Gentiles; it is the beauty, riches, and support of the world. (3.) They shall all be blessed of the Lord. [1.] They shall all be owned by him as his. Though Egypt was formerly a house of bondage to the people of God, and Assyria an unjust invader of them, all this shall now be forgiven and forgotten, and they shall be as welcome to God as Israel. They are all alike his people whom he takes under his protection. They are formed by him, for they are the work of his hands; not only as a people, but as his people. They are formed for him; for they are his inheritance, precious in his eyes, and dear to him, and from whom he has his rent of honour out of this lower world. [2.] They shall be owned together by him as jointly his, his in concert; they shall all share in one and the same blessing. Note, Those that are united in the love and blessing of God ought, for that reason, to be united to each other in charity.”
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Chanaan. Hebrew. The Israelites had a connection with Egypt, which the prophets often blame, chap. xxx. 2. Ezechias trusted in their aid, when he refused to pay tribute to the Assyrians. Many at that time, or afterwards, retired thither, and served God unmolested, chap. xi. 2., and Jeremias xlii. More established themselves in the country under Alexander [the Great] and the Ptolemies. (3 Machabees viii.) But this prediction was more fully accomplished by the propagation of the Christian religion. Grace no where shone forth more brightly than in this country, once the seat of superstition. — Sun. Hebrew, “of desolation.” But the copies have varied. It is supposed to denote the city On, Genesis xli. 45. (Calmet) — Prideaux (p. 2. b. 4.) accuses the Jews of willfully corrupting this text in the Septuagint. (Kennicott)”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“This is the name given in Ar. and in Symmachus. P. "The city of destruction." This, which was an epithet of a lion, was applied to a city, Leontopolis, in the uome of Heliopolis, in Egypt.”
1871
A.D.
1871
“In that day, &c.--Suffering shall lead to repentance. Struck with "terror" and "afraid" (Isa 19:17) because of Jehovah's judgments, Egypt shall be converted to Him: nay, even Assyria shall join in serving Him; so that Israel, Assyria, and Egypt, once mutual foes, shall be bound together by the tie of a common faith as one people. So a similar issue from other prophecies (Isa 18:7; Isa 23:18). five cities--that is, several cities, as in Isa 17:6; Isa 30:17; Gen 43:34; Lev 26:8. Rather, five definite cities of Lower Egypt (Isa 19:11, Isa 19:13; Isa 30:4), which had close intercourse with the neighboring Jewish cities [MAURER]; some say, Heliopolis, Leontopolis (else Diospolis), Migdol, Daphne (Tahpanes), and Memphis. language of Canaan--that is, of the Hebrews in Canaan, the language of revelation; figuratively for, They shall embrace the Jewish religion: so "a pure language" and conversion to God are connected in Zep 3:9; as also the first confounding and multiplication of languages was the punishment of the making of gods at Babel, other than the One God. Pentecost (Act 2:4) was the counterpart of Babel: the separation of nations is not to hinder the unity of faith; the full realization of this is yet future (Zac 14:9; Joh 17:21). The next clause, "swear to the Lord of Hosts," agrees with this view; that is, bind themselves to Him by solemn covenant (Isa 45:23; Isa 65:16; Deu 6:13). city of destruction--Onias; "city of the sun," that is, On, or Heliopolis; he persuaded Ptolemy Philometer (149 B.C.) to let him build a temple in the prefecture (nome) of Heliopolis, on the ground that it would induce Jews to reside there, and that the very site was foretold by Isaiah six hundred years before. The reading of the Hebrew text is, however, better supported, "city of destruction"; referring to Leontopolis, the site of Onias' temple: which casts a reproach on that city because it was about to contain a temple rivalling the only sanctioned temple, that at Jerusalem. MAURER, with some manuscripts, reads "city of defense" or "deliverance"; namely, Memphis, or some such city, to which God was about to send "a saviour" (Isa 19:20), to "deliver them."”
Source
1875
A.D.
Keil & Delitzsch Lutheran
1861–1875
“At first there is only slavish fear; but there is the beginning of a turn to something better. "In that day there will be five cities in the land of Egypt speaking the language of Canaan, and swearing to Jehovah of hosts: 'Ir ha-Heres will one be called." Five cities are very few for Egypt, which was completely covered with cities; but this is simply a fragmentary commencement of Egypt's future and complete conversion. The description given of them, as beginning to speak the language of Canaan, i.e., the sacred language of the worship of Jehovah (comp. Zep 3:9), and to give themselves up to Jehovah with vows made on oath, is simply a periphrastic announcement of the conversion of the five cities. ל נשׁבּע (different from בּ נשׁבּע, Isa 65:16, as Isa 45:23 clearly shows) signifies to swear to a person, to promise him fidelity, to give one's self up to him. One of these five will be called ‛Ir ha-Heres. As this is evidently intended for a proper name, lâ'echât does not mean unicuique, as in Jdg 8:18 and Eze 1:6, but uni. It is a customary thing with Isaiah to express the nature of anything under the form of some future name (vid., Isa 4:3; Isa 32:5; Isa 61:6; Isa 62:4). The name in this instance, therefore, must have a distinctive and promising meaning. But what does ‛Ir ha-Heres mean? The Septuagint has changed it into πόλις ἀσεδέκ, equivalent to ‛Ir hazzedek (city of righteousness), possibly in honour of the temple in the Heliopolitan nomos, which was founded under Ptolemaeus Philometor about 160 b.c., during the Syrian reign of terror, by Onias IV, son of the high priest Onias III, who emigrated to Egypt. (Note: See Frankel on this Egyptian auxiliary temple, in his Monatschrift fr Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums, 1852, p. 273ff.; Herzfeld, Geschichte des Volkes Israel, iii. 460ff., 557ff.; and Grtz, Geschichte der Juden, iii. 36ff.) Maurer in his Lexicon imagines that he has found the true meaning, when he renders it "city of rescue;" but the progressive advance from the meaning "to pull off' to that of "setting free" cannot be established in the case of the verb hâras; in fact, hâras does not mean to pull off or pull out, but to pull down. Heres cannot have any other meaning in Hebrew than that of "destruction." But as this appears unsuitable, it is more natural to read ‛Ir ha-cheres (which is found in some codices, though in opposition to the Masora). (Note: But no Greek codex has the reading πόλις ἀχερές (see Holmes-Parsons' V. T. Graecum c. var. lect. t. iv. on this passage), as the Complutensian has emended it after the Vulgate (see the Vocabluarium Hebr. 37a, belonging to the Complutensian).) This is now generally rendered "city of protection" (Rosenmller, Ewald, Knobel, and Meier), as being equivalent to an Arabic word signifying divinitus protecta. But such an appeal to the Arabic is contrary to all Hebrew usage, and is always a very precarious loophole. ‛Ir ha-cheres would mean "city of the sun" (cheres as in Job 9:7 and Jdg 14:18), as the Talmud in the leading passage concerning the Onias temple (in b. Menahoth 110a) thinks that even the received reading may be understood in accordance with Job 9:7, and says "it is a description of the sun." "Sun-city" was really the name of one of the most celebrated of the old Egyptian cities, viz., Heliopolis, the city of the sun-god Ra, which was situated to the north-east of Memphis, and is called On in other passages of the Old Testament. Ezekiel (Eze 30:17) alters this into Aven, for the purpose of branding the idolatry of the city. (Note: Heliopolis answers to the sacred name Pe-ra, house of the sun-god (like Pe-Ramesses, house of Ramses), which was a name borne by the city that was at other times called On (old Egyptian anu). Cyrill, however, explains even the latter thus, Ὤν δέ ἐστι κατ ̓ αὐτοὺς ὁ ἤλιος ("On, according to their interpretation, is the sun"), which is so far true according to Lauth, that Ain, Oin, Oni, signifies the eye as an emblem of the sun; and from this, the tenth month, which marks the return of the sun to the equinoctial point, derives its name of Pa-oni, Pa-one, Pa-uni. It may possibly be with reference to this that Heliopolis is called Ain es-sems in Arabic (see Arnold, Chrestom. Arab. p. 56 s.). Edrisi (iii. 3) speaks of this Ain es-sems as "the country-seat of Pharaoh, which may God curse;" just as Bin el-Faraun is a common expression of contempt, which the Arabs apply to the Coptic fellahs.) But this alteration of the well-attested text is a mistake; and the true explanation is, that Ir-hahares is simply used with a play upon the name Ir-hacheres. This is the explanation given by the Targum: "Heliopolis, whose future fate will be destruction." But even if the name is intended to have a distinctive and promising meaning, it is impossible to adopt the explanation given by Luzzatto, "a city restored from the ruins;" for the name points to destruction, not to restoration. Moreover, Heliopolis never has been restored since the time of its destruction, which Strabo dates as far back as the Persian invasion. There is nothing left standing now out of all its monuments but one granite obelisk: they are all either destroyed, or carried away, like the so-called "Cleopatra's Needle," or sunk in the soil of the Nile (Parthey on Plutarch, de Iside, p. 162). This destruction cannot be the one intended. But hâras is the word commonly used to signify the throwing down of heathen altars (Jdg 6:25; Kg1 18:30; Kg1 19:10, Kg1 19:14); and the meaning of the prophecy may be, that the city which had hitherto been ‛Ir-ha-cheres, the chief city of the sun-worship, would become the city of the destruction of idolatry, as Jeremiah prophesies in Isa 43:13, "Jehovah will break in pieces the obelisks of the sun-temple in the land of Egypt." Hence Herzfeld's interpretation: "City of demolished Idols". It is true that in this case ha-heres merely announces the breaking up of the old, and does not say what new thing will rise upon the ruins of the old; but the context leaves no doubt as to this new thing, and the one-sided character of the description is to be accounted for from the intentional play upon the actual name of that one city out of the five to which the prophet gives especial prominence. With this interpretation - for which indeed we cannot pretend to find any special confirmation in the actual fulfilment in the history of the church, and, so to speak, the history of missions - the train of thought in the prophet's mind which led to the following groove of promises is a very obvious one.”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.