And the covering of Juda shall be discovered, and thou shalt see in that day the armoury of the house of the forest.

“And he bared (וַיְגַל), an expression of uncovering. the covert of Judah That is the Temple, which shielded, protected, and covered them. and you looked on that day for means of waging war. to the weapons of the house of the forest They are the three hundred shields and two hundred body shields that Solomon made, and the king placed them in the house of the forest of Lebanon (I Kings 10:16).”

“The burden of the valley. Here he threatens against those who were joined to the people of God by right of leadership, and yet despoiled it of its goods: and first as regards those to whom leadership pertained in temporal matters; second, against those to whom it pertained in spiritual matters: "thus says the Lord." Now leadership in temporal matters pertained to kings: and therefore in the first part he threatens against Jerusalem, which was the seat of the kingdom; and concerning this he does two things. First the title is set down, "valley," that is, Jerusalem — not on account of the location's site, since it is on a mountain, but on account of vileness, because to it, as to a valley, filth flowed together from every side, while it followed the practice of the neighboring nations. Ezek. 5: "This is Jerusalem; I have set her in the midst of the nations." Or it is called a valley on account of the lowest part of the city, which was handed over by Shebna to Sennacherib. "Of vision," on account of the holiness of the temple: for in it visions were made to the prophets by the Lord; or on account of the eminence of the place, because it could be seen from afar; or on account of the name which Abraham gave to that place, as is said in Gen. 22: "and he called the name of that place, On the mountain the Lord will see." Second, the threat itself is set down; and concerning this he does three things. First he charges the fault; second he threatens the punishment: "and your slain"; third he shows, within the punishment itself, the persistence of obstinacy: "and you gathered together." Concerning the first he does two things. First he charges a twofold sin. Of idolatry: "what ails you then, that you have gone up to the housetops" — to sacrifice to idols — and you, who rejoiced in the special act of a holy privilege? Hosea 4: "If you play the harlot, Israel, let not Judah at least offend." And the sin of strife: "full of clamor." Above, 5: "I looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes." Second, to aggravate the sin, a twofold benefit of God is set down: namely of the multitude of men, "a populous city": Lam. 1: "How does the city sit solitary, that was full of people?" And of the fullness of joys, "an exulting city," once, in the time of Solomon, on account of excessive prosperity. Ps. 47: "is founded with the exultation of the whole." "Slain." Here he sets down the punishment: and first he threatens the destruction of men as regards those besieged who died of famine: not slain by the sword, but by famine and thirst. Lam. 4: "It was better for those slain by the sword than by famine." As regards the fugitive princes, namely those who were seized and bound, as is read in Jeremiah, last chapter: "all the princes." Lam. 1: "the princes have become like rams that find no pasture." As regards those seized in the city, who were likewise taken captive: "all who were found," "afar off" — into a distant land, led into captivity. Deut. 28: "The Lord will lead into a distant nation." Second, he sets down the prophet's inconsolable compassion: "depart" — you consoling prophets — "do not press upon me," in the manner of those who console. Jer. 9: "Who will give water to my head, and to my eyes a fountain of tears, that I may weep for the slain of my people?" Third, he sets down the manner and order of the punishment: "a day of slaughter"; and concerning this he sets down three things. First, God's indignation: "a day of slaughter" impends. "Searching" — causing a search to be made by the enemies; "magnificent" — making the enemies magnificent: for they trusted in mountains and walls. Zeph. 1: "At that time he will search Jerusalem with lamps, and I will visit upon the men who are settled on their lees." Second, he sets down the overpowering by the enemies: "and Elam" — a city of Persia, from which fighters came with Nebuchadnezzar, who held the monarchy of the East. "The shield," borne against Jerusalem, "has laid bare the wall," on which it had been hung for the adornment of the house. Jer. 46: "Prepare shield and buckler." Or otherwise: "the shield" — the power of the Chaldean — "has laid bare the wall" of the temple of the gold with which it was clothed. Third, he sets down the infliction of loss as regards four things. First as regards the devastation of possessions. "They shall be choice; of chariots" — of Babylon. Jer. 49: "Why do you glory in the valleys? Your valley has flowed away, delicate daughter." Second, as regards the capture of the cities: "horsemen at the gate," lest anyone escape. Jer. 39: "All the princes of Babylon entered, and sat in the middle gate." Third, as regards the profanation of holy things: "and it shall be uncovered" — it shall be laid bare — "the covering," that is, the holy things previously covered, which it was lawful for none but the priest to see. Lam. 1: "The nations have seen your shame." Fourth, as regards the destruction of the armory: "you will see the armory" — that is, the house of the forest, in which weapons were stored — overthrown; concerning the building of which, 3 Kings 7. "Of the city of David," most strong; or Jerusalem itself, with a strong wall in many places. Cant. 4: "The tower of David is built with bulwarks." "And you gathered the waters." Here he sets down the persistence of obstinacy: and first he charges the fault of obstinacy; second he sets forth against them the divine sentence: "and it has been revealed." Now their obstinacy is charged as regards two things. First, as regards the divine help which they did not invoke, trusting in their own strength and ingenuity: "you gathered" — into one place within the city, through hidden channels — "the waters of the lower pool," which had waters flowing from the earth, which, however, could be cut off by the enemies. "You numbered," so that the water might be dispensed by number and measure; "you destroyed the houses" which were next to the wall, so that they would not hinder the defenders; "a reservoir," of the lower pool, "you made," "to flow" between the two walls with which the city was girded; and the water — namely, you restored it; "him" — that is, God; "her" — the water. Ps. 13: "They did not call upon God." Second, as regards the divine counsel, which they despised: "and he will call." And concerning this he sets down three things. First, the counsel itself: "to weeping" — of the eyes; "to mourning" — of the hands; "to baldness," according to the ancient custom, by which they performed these actions in sorrow. Joel 2: "Turn to me with all your heart, in fasting, and weeping, and mourning." Second, he sets down the contempt of the counsel: "and behold joy" — above, 6: "the harp and the lyre are in your feasts." Third, the spirit of contempt: "let us eat." 1 Cor. 15. Wisdom 2: "for our time is the passing of a shadow." "And it has been revealed." Here the sentence is set down; and it can be read as from the person of the Lord: "this blasphemy of yours has been revealed" — that is, I have heard it. "If it shall be forgiven": as if he were to say, do not believe it — above, 2: "therefore do not forgive." Or from the person of the prophet: "this is the voice of the Lord" that has been revealed. And all these things that have been said pertain to the captivity brought about under the rule of Nebuchadnezzar. "Thus says the Lord." Here the threat is set down against those to whom leadership in spiritual matters pertained: and first against the priest who then was; second against the whole priestly order: "in that day, says the Lord." Concerning the first he does two things. First he foretells the deposing of him who, struck with terror, handed over the city to Sennacherib — that is, the lower part; second, the substitution of another: "and it shall come to pass in that day." Concerning the first he does three things. First he describes the person by his office: "who dwells in the tabernacle." It belonged to the priest to keep watch in the tabernacle, as is found in Num. 1. "Set over" — supreme over ten. Second he charges a threefold fault: of unworthy habitation: "what are you doing here" in my house, unworthy of such a habitation? Jer. 11: "What is it that my beloved has done many wicked things in my house?" Of proud presumption concerning himself: "or as who are you here?" Do you esteem yourself as if you were of some worth, when you are nothing? Zech. 11: "O shepherd, and idol." Of the curious building of a sepulcher: "you have hewn out," here in Jerusalem next to the temple, "a memorial," that is, an epitaph, "in a high place," that is, in the loftiest site of the sepulcher; or literally, he had placed his sepulcher in a high place for his own memory, as is found in 1 Macc. 13. Third he threatens the punishment: "behold, the Lord" — threefold: first, of captivity, just as one is carried off — bound, and without labor — a cock, one that rears chicks in the manner of a hen, being castrated, which they call capons; and, as a garment, lightly lifted upon the shoulder. Jer. 20: "You, Pashhur, and all the inhabitants of your house, shall go into captivity, and you shall come into Babylon, and there you shall die, and there you shall be buried, you and all your friends." Second, of confusion: "crowning" — that is, in place of the crown which you used in the pontifical rite, you will have tribulation, like a ball, which finds no lofty resting-place. "The chariots of your glory," in which you were borne gloriously, turned into your confusion. "And the shame of the house of the Lord"; that is, the glory which you had in the house of the Lord will be turned for you into shame. Hosea 4: "I will change their glory into shame." Third, the punishment of deposition: "and I will drive out." 3 Kings 2: "Solomon therefore cast out Abiathar, that he should not be priest of the Lord." "And it shall be." Here he sets down the substitution of another; and concerning this he sets down three things. The election: "I will call" — one of the twenty-four, as is read in 1 Chron. 25; 1 Kings 2: "I will raise up for myself a faithful priest, who shall be according to my heart." Second, his consecration: "and I will clothe him"; for he was consecrated with the pontifical vestments, as is clear from Lev. 18 concerning these vestments, and Exod. 28. Third, he confers jurisdiction: "and power." And first as regards the power which he had over the people, setting down the power: "and the power" — namely, "I will give." Ps. 108: "Let his days be few, and let another take his office." "And he shall be as a father." Jer. 3: "I will give you shepherds according to my own heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine." Second, as regards the power which he had over the temple: "and the key," which was golden, "of the house of David," that is, of the temple, for the building of which David prepared the expenses, as is clear at the end of 1 Chron.; "upon his shoulder," that is, his own governance; or because he used it as a kind of ornament. "He shall open," because it was lawful for him to enter once a year into the holy of holies, as is said in Heb. 9. Third, as regards the power which he had over the whole order of ministers: "and I will fasten him as a peg" — a diminutive from "pole"; for just as various vessels are hung upon some pole, so various offices, which have the use of various vessels in the ministries of the house of the Lord, pertained to his charge: "in the place of the faithful," namely, the temple. Concerning this power it is spoken of in Numbers 3 and 4. "In that day." Here he speaks against the whole priesthood, which was destroyed in the time of Zedekiah, when Nebuchadnezzar took captive. For the things that were said about Shebna pertain to the time of Sennacherib. And here "the peg" is called the priesthood itself, which ceased at the time of the captivity. Hosea 3: "The children of Israel shall sit many days without king, and without prince, and without sacrifice, and without altar, and without ephod, and without teraphim." Note, upon that word "who dwells in the tabernacle," that the tabernacle is manifold. The first, of carnal concupiscence, which is that of swine. Heb., last chapter: "We have an altar, from which they have no right to eat who serve the tabernacle." The second is of temporal and natural life, which is that of men. 2 Pet. 1: "For I am certain that the putting off of my tabernacle is swift." The third is of the Church militant, which is that of those who fight. Above, 4: "It shall be a tabernacle for a shade in the daytime from the heat." The fourth is of contemplative wisdom, which is that of those who rest. Ps. 131: "We will go into his tabernacle." The fifth is of the eternal vision, or the heavenly homeland: which is that of all the blessed. Below, 33: "Your eyes shall see Jerusalem, a wealthy city, a tabernacle that can never be removed."”

“What is meant by the covering of Judah, which in the beginning of this paragraph is said to be discovered, is not agreed. The fenced cities of Judah were a covering to the country; but these, being taken by the army of the Assyrians, ceased to be a shelter, so that the whole country lay exposed to be plundered. The weakness of Judah, its nakedness, and inability to keep itself, now appeared more than ever; and thus the covering of Judah was discovered. Its magazines and stores, which had been locked up, were now laid open for the public use. Dr. Lightfoot gives another sense of it, that by this distress into which Judah should be brought God would discover their covering (that is, uncloak their hypocrisy), would show all that was in their heart, as is said of Hezekiah upon another occasion, Ch2 32:31. Thus, by one means or other, the iniquity of Ephraim will be discovered and the sin of Samaria, Hos 7:1. They were now in a great fright, and in this fright they manifested two things much amiss: - I. A great contempt of God's goodness, and his power to help them. They made use of all the means they could think of for their own preservation; and it is not for doing this that they are blamed, but, in doing this, they did not acknowledge God. Observe, 1. How careful they were to improve all advantages that might contribute to their safety. When Sennacherib had made himself master of all the defenced cities of Judah, and Jerusalem was left as a cottage in a vineyard, they thought it was time to look about them. A council was immediately called, a council of war; and it was resolved to stand upon their defence, and not tamely to surrender. Pursuant to this resolve, they took all the prudent measures they could for their own security. We tempt God if, in times of danger, we do not the best we can for ourselves. (1.) They inspected the magazines and stores, to see if they were well stocked with arms and ammunition: They looked to the armour of the house of the forest, which Solomon built in Jerusalem for an armoury (Kg1 10:17), and thence they delivered out what they had occasion for. It is the wisdom of princes, in time of peace, to provide for war, that they may not have arms to seek when they should use them, and perhaps upon a sudden emergency. (2.) They viewed the fortifications, the breaches of the city of David; they walked round the walls, and observed where they had gone to decay for want of seasonable repairs, or were broken by some former attempts made upon them. These breaches were many; the more shame for the house of David that they suffered the city of David to lie neglected. They had probably often seen those breaches; but now they saw them to consider what course to take about them. This good we should get by public distresses, we should be awakened by them to repair our breaches, and amend what is amiss. (3.) They made sure of water for the city, and did what they could to deprive the besiegers of it: You gathered together the water of the lower pool, of which there was probably no great store, and of which therefore they were the more concerned to be good husbands. See what a mercy it is that, as nothing is more necessary to the support of human life than water, so nothing is more cheap and common; but it is bad indeed when that, as here, is a scarce commodity. (4.) They numbered the houses of Jerusalem, that every house might send in its quota of men for the public service, or contribute in money to it, which they raised by a poll, so much a head or so much a house. (5.) Because private property ought to give way to the public safety, those houses that stood in their way, when the wall was to be fortified, were broken down, which, in such a case of necessity, is no more an injury to the owner than blowing up houses in case of fire. (6.) They made a ditch between the outer and inner wall, for the greater security of the city; and they contrived to draw the water of the old pool to it, that they might have plenty of water themselves and might deprive the besiegers of it; for it seems that was the project, lest the Assyrian army should come and find much water (Ch2 32:4) and so should be the better able to prolong the siege. If it be lawful to destroy the forage of a country, much more to divert the streams of its waters, for the straitening and starving of an enemy. 2. How regardless they were of God in all these preparations: But you have not looked unto the Maker thereof (that is, of Jerusalem, the city you are so solicitous for the defence of) and of all the advantages which nature has furnished it with for its defence - the mountains round about it (Psa 125:2), and the rivers, which were such as the inhabitants might turn which way soever they pleased for their convenience. Note, (1.) It is God that made his Jerusalem, and fashioned it long ago, in his counsels. The Jewish writers, upon this place, say, There were seven things which God made before the world (meaning which he had in his eye when he made the world): the garden of Eden, the law, the just ones, Israel, the throne of glory, Jerusalem, and Messiah the Prince. The gospel church has God for its Maker. (2.) Whatever service we do, or endeavour to do, at any time to God's Jerusalem, must be done with an eye to him as the Maker of it; and he takes it ill if it be done otherwise. It is here charged upon them that they did not look to God. [1.] They did not design his glory in what they did. They fortified Jerusalem because it was a rich city and their own houses were in it, not because it was the holy city and God's house was in it. In all our cares for the defence of the church we must look more at God's interest in it than at our own. [2.] They did not depend upon him for a blessing upon their endeavours, saw no need of it, and therefore sought not to him for it, but thought their own powers and policies sufficient for them. Of Hezekiah himself it is said that he trusted in God (Kg2 18:5), and particularly upon this occasion (Ch2 32:8); but there were those about him, it seems, who were great statesmen and soldiers, but had little religion in them. [3.] They did not give him thanks for the advantages they had, in fortifying their city, from the waters of the old pool, which were fashioned long ago, as Kishon is called an ancient river, Jdg 5:21. Whatever in nature is at any time serviceable to us, we must therein acknowledge the goodness of the God of nature, who, when he fashioned it long ago, fitted it to be so, and according to whose ordinance it continues to this day. Every creature is that to us which God makes it to be; and therefore, whatever use it is of to us, we must look at him that fashioned it, bless him for it, and use it for him. II. A great contempt of God's wrath and justice in contending with them, Isa 22:12-14. Here observe, 1. What was God's design in bringing this calamity upon them: it was to humble them, bring them to repentance, and make them serious. In that day of trouble, and treading down, and perplexity, the Lord did thereby call to weeping and mourning, and all the expressions of sorrow, even to baldness and girding with sackcloth; and all this to lament their sins (by which they had brought those judgments upon their land), to enforce their prayers (by which they might hope to avert the judgments that were breaking in), and to dispose themselves to a reformation of their lives by a holy seriousness and a tenderness of heart under the word of God. To this God called them by his prophet's explaining his providences, and by his providences awakening them to regard what his prophets said. Note, When God threatens us with his judgments he expects and requires that we humble ourselves under his mighty hand, that we tremble when the lion roars, and in a day of adversity consider. 2. How contrary they walked to this design of God (Isa 22:13): Behold, joy and gladness, mirth and feasting, all the gaiety and all the jollity imaginable. They were as secure and cheerful as they used to be, as if they had had no enemy in their borders or were in no danger of falling into his hands. When they had taken the necessary precautions for their security, then they set all deaths and dangers at defiance, and resolved to be merry, let come on them what would. Those that should have been among the mourners were among the wine-bibbers, the riotous eaters of flesh; and observe what they said, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die. This may refer either to the particular danger they were now in, and the fair warning which the prophet gave them of it, or to the general shortness and uncertainty of human life, and the nearness of death at all times. This was the language of the profane scoffers who mocked the messengers of the Lord and misused his prophets. (1.) They made a jest of dying. "The prophet tells us we must die shortly, perhaps tomorrow, and therefore we should mourn and repent today; no, rather let us eat and drink, that we may be fattened for the slaughter, and may be in good heart to meet our doom; if we must have a short life, let it be a merry one." (2.) They ridiculed the doctrine of a future state on the other side death; for, if there were no such state, the apostle grants there would be something of reason in what they said, Co1 15:32. If, when we die, there were an end of us, it were good to make ourselves as easy and merry as we could while we live; but, if for all these things God shall bring us into judgment, it is at our peril if we walk in the way of our heart and the sight of our eyes, Ecc 11:9. Note, A practical disbelief of another life after this is at the bottom of the carnal security and brutish sensuality which are the sin, and shame, and ruin of so great a part of mankind, as of the old world, who were eating and drinking till the flood came. 3. How much God was displeased at it. He signified his resentment of it to the prophet, revealed it in his ears, to be by him proclaimed upon the house-top: Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till you die, Isa 22:14. It shall never be expiated with sacrifice and offering, any more than the iniquity of the house of Eli, Sa1 3:14. It is a sin against the remedy, a baffling of the utmost means of conviction and rendering them ineffectual; and therefore it is not likely they should ever repent of it or have it pardoned. The Chaldee reads it, It shall not be forgiven you till you die the second death. Those that walk contrary to them; with the froward he will show himself froward.”

“And he discovered the covering of Judah,.... Either God himself, who uncloaked them of their hypocrisy, as Dr. Lightfoot; or took away his power and presence from them, and his protection of them, and discovered their weakness; or rather the enemy Sennacherib: and then by the covering is meant, not Jerusalem, nor the temple, as Jarchi and Kimchi, for neither of them came into his hands; but the fenced cities of Judah, which were the strength and protection of the country; these he took and dismantled, Kg2 18:13 and when this was done, it was high time for the Jews at Jerusalem to look about them, and provide for their defence and safety: and thou, didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forest; to see what store of armour they had, in what condition it was, and to take from hence, and furnish themselves and soldiers with it, to annoy the enemy, and defend themselves. This house of the forest is the same with the house of the forest of Lebanon; so called, not because built in it, for it was in Jerusalem, but because it was built of the wood of Lebanon; or because it was surrounded with trees, and had walks and groves belonging to it, resembling that forest. This was an armoury; here Solomon put his two hundred targets, and three hundred shields of beaten gold, Kg1 7:2 see also Sol 4:4.”

“he discovered the covering--rather, "the veil of Judah shall be taken off" [HORSLEY]: figuratively for, exposing to shame as a captive (Isa 47:3; Nah 3:5). Sennacherib dismantled all "the defensed cities of Judah" (Isa 36:1). thou didst look--rather, "thou shalt look." house of . . . forest--The house of armory built of cedar from the forest of Lebanon by Solomon, on a slope of Zion called Ophel (Kg1 7:2; Kg1 10:17; Neh 3:19). Isaiah says (Isa 22:8-13) his countrymen will look to their own strength to defend themselves, while others of them will drown their sorrows as to their country in feasting, but none will look to Jehovah.”

“When Judah, after being for a long time intoxicated with hope, shall become aware of the extreme danger in which it is standing, it will adopt prudent measures, but without God. "Then he takes away the covering of Judah, and thou lookest in that day to the store of arms of the forest-house; and ye see the breaches of the city of David, that there are many of them; and ye collect together the waters of the lower pool. And ye number the houses of Jerusalem, and pull down the houses, to fortify the wall. And ye make a basin between the two walls for the waters of the old pool; and ye do not look to Him who made it, neither do ye have regard to Him who fashioned it long ago." Mâsâk is the curtain or covering which made Judah blind to the threatening danger. Their looks are now directed first of all to the forest-house, built by Solomon upon Zion for the storing and display of valuable arms and utensils (nēshĕk, or rather, according to the Masora on Job 20:24, and the older editions, nĕshĕk), and so called because it rested upon four rows of cedar columns that ran all round (it was in the centre of the fore-court of the royal palace; see Thenius, das vorexil. Jerusalem, p. 13). They also noticed in the city of David, the southern and highest portion of the city of Jerusalem, the bad state of the walls, and began to think of repairing them. To this end they numbered the houses of the city, to obtain building materials for strengthening the walls and repairing the breaches, by pulling down such houses as were suitable for the purpose, and could be dispensed with (vattithtzu, from nâthatz, with the removal of the recompensative reduplication). The lower pool and the old pool, probably the upper, i.e., the lower and upper Gihon, were upon the western side of the city, the lower (Birket es-Sultan) to the west of Sion, the upper (Birket el-Mamilla) farther up to the west of Akra (Robinson, i. 483-486; V. Raumer, Pal. pp. 305-6). Kibbētz either means to collect in the pool by stopping up the outflow, or to gather together in the reservoirs and wells of the city by means of artificial canals. The latter, however, would most probably be expressed by אסף; so that the meaning that most naturally suggests itself is, that they concentrate the water, so as to be able before the siege to provide the city as rapidly as possible with a large supply. The word sâtham, which is used in the account of the actual measures adopted by Hezekiah when he was threatened with siege (Ch2 32:2-5), is a somewhat different one, and indicates the stopping up, not of the outflow but of the springs, and therefore of the influx. But in all essential points the measures adopted agree with those indicated here in the prophecy. The chronicler closes the account of Hezekiah's reign by still further observing that "Hezekiah also stopped the outflow of the upper Gihon, and carried the water westwards underground to the city of David" (Ch2 32:30, explanatory of Kg2 20:20). If the upper Gihon is the same as the upper pool, there was a conduit (teeâlâh), connected with the upper Gihon as early as the time of Ahaz, Isa 7:3. And Hezekiah's peculiar work consisted in carrying the water of the upper pool "into the city of David." The mikvâh between the two walls, which is here prospectively described by Isaiah, is connected with this water supply, which Hezekiah really carried out. There is still a pool of Hezekiah (also called Birket el-Batrak, pool of the patriarchs, the Amygdalon of Josephus) on the western side of the city, to the east of the Joppa gate. During the rainy season this pool is supplied by the small conduit which runs from the upper pool along the surface of the ground, and then under the wall against or near the Joppa gate. It also lies between two walls, viz., the wall to the north of Zion, and the one which runs to the north-east round the Akra (Robinson, i. 487-489). How it came to pass that Isaiah's words concerning "a basin between the two walls" were so exactly carried out, as though they had furnished a hydraulic plan, we do not know. But we will offer a conjecture at the close of the exposition. It stands here as one of those prudent measures which would be resorted to in Jerusalem in the anticipation of the coming siege; but it would be thought of too late, and in self-reliant alienation from God, with no look directed to Him who had wrought and fashioned that very calamity which they were now seeking to avert by all these precautions, and by whom it had been projected long, long before the actual realization. עשׂיה might be a plural, according to Isa 54:5; but the parallel יצרהּ favours the singular (on the form itself, from עשׂי = עשׂה, see Isa 42:5, and at Isa 5:12; Isa 1:30). We have here, and at Isa 37:26, i.e., within the first part of the book of Isaiah, the same doctrine of "ideas" that forms so universal a key-note of the second part, the authenticity of which has been denied. That which is realized in time has existed long before as a spiritual pattern, i.e., as an idea in God. God shows this to His prophets; and so far as prophecy foretells the future, whenever the event predicted is fulfilled, the prophecy becomes a proof that the event is the work of God, and was long ago the predetermined counsel of God. The whole of the Scripture presupposes this pre-existence of the divine idea before the historical realization, and Isaiah in Israel (like Plato in the heathen world) was the assiduous interpreter of this supposition. Thus, in the case before us, the fate of Jerusalem is said to have been fashioned "long ago" in God. But Jerusalem might have averted its realization, for it was no decretum absolutum. If Jerusalem repented, the realization would be arrested.”