The interpretation timeline
John 3:5 Douay-Rheims

Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

A.D. 407 – 1871 9 witnesses 14 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“(Hom. xxiv. 3) While Nicodemus stumbles, dwelling upon our birth here, Christ reveals more clearly the manner of our spiritual birth; Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“(Tr. xii. c. 5) As if He said, Thou understandest me to speak of a carnal birth; but a man must be born of water and of the Spirit, if he is to enter into the kingdom of God. If to obtain the temporal inheritance of his human father, a man must be born of the womb of his mother; to obtain the eternal inheritance of his heavenly Father, he must be born of the womb of the Church. And since man consists of two parts, body and soul, the mode even of this latter birth is twofold; water the visible part cleansing the body; the Spirit by His invisible cooperation, changing the invisible soul.”
Source
“(lib. i. de Bapt. per. c. 30) Because He does not say, Except a man be born again1 of water and of the Spirit, he shall not have salvation, or eternal life; but, he shall not enter into the kingdom of God; from this, some infer that children are to be baptized in order to be with Christ in the kingdom of God, where they would not be, were they not baptized; but that they will obtain salvation and eternal life even if they die without baptism, not being bound with any chain of sin. But why is a man born again, except to be changed from his old into a new state? Or why doth the image of God not enter into the kingdom of God, if it be not by reason of sin?”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1107
A.D.
c. 1055–1107
“(in loc.) This completely refutes Macedonius the impugner of the Spirit, who asserted that the Holy Ghost was a servant. The Holy Ghost, we find, works by His own power, where He will, and what He will.”
1270
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Above, the Evangelist showed the power of Christ with respect to the changing of nature; but here he shows it with respect to the reformation of grace, which is his principal intention. Now the reformation of grace comes about through spiritual generation, and through the conferring of benefits upon those regenerated. Therefore he first treats of spiritual generation; second, of the divine conferring of spiritual benefits upon those regenerated, and this in chapter 5, where it says, "After this there was a feast day of the Jews," and so on. Concerning the first he does two things. First he treats of spiritual regeneration with respect to the Jews; second, of the spreading of the fruits of this regeneration also to the foreign nations. And this in chapter 4, where it says, "When therefore Jesus knew that the Pharisees had heard," and so on. Concerning the first he does two things. First he manifests spiritual regeneration in words; second he fulfills it in deeds, where it says, "After this Jesus came, and his disciples, into the land of Judea," and so on. Concerning the first he does three things. First he shows the necessity of spiritual regeneration; second its quality, where it says, "Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old?" Third, its manner and reason, where it says, "Nicodemus answered and said to him: How can these things be done?" Concerning the first he does two things. First he shows the occasion for demonstrating the necessity; second the necessity of this regeneration, where it says, "Jesus answered and said to him: Amen, amen, I say to you," and so on. Now the occasion of this necessity is introduced from Nicodemus; and therefore he says, "Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus," and so on. He describes him from his person, from the time, and from his own confession. From his person indeed he is described with respect to three things: namely, with respect to religion, because he was a Pharisee; hence it says, "there was a man of the Pharisees." For there was a twofold sect among the Jews, namely that of the Pharisees and that of the Sadducees. But the Pharisees agreed more with us in their opinions, because they believed in the resurrection and said that there were certain spiritual creatures. The Sadducees, however, disagreed more, because they believed neither in a future resurrection nor that spirit existed. And these were called Pharisees, as it were "divided" from others. And because their opinion was more probable, and closer to the truth, therefore Nicodemus was more easily converted to Christ. Acts 26:5: "according to the most certain sect of our religion," and so on. Likewise, with respect to his name, when it says, "named Nicodemus," which is interpreted "victor," or "victory of the people," by which are signified those who, converted from the Jews to Christ, conquered the world by faith. 1 John 5:4: "This is the victory that overcomes the world, our faith." Likewise third, with respect to dignity; hence it says, "a ruler of the Jews." For from the beginning, although the Lord did not choose the wise, the powerful, or the noble, lest the power of faith be attributed to human wisdom and power, as is said in 1 Corinthians 1:26, "not many wise according to the flesh, not many powerful, not many noble, but the foolish things of the world God has chosen," nevertheless he willed to convert some wise and powerful men to himself from the beginning, lest, if his teaching were received only by the ignoble and unwise, it should be held in contempt, and lest the multitude of believers be attributed rather to the rusticity and unwisdom of the converts than to the power of faith. Nevertheless he willed that these noble and powerful ones converted to him not be many, lest, as has been said, it be ascribed to human power or wisdom. And therefore it is said in John 12:42 that some of the rulers believed in him, among whom was this Nicodemus; Psalm 46:10: "the princes of the peoples are gathered together." From the time, however, he describes him when he says, "this man came to Jesus by night," and so on. Concerning which it must be known that the quality of time is accustomed in Scripture to be described concerning certain persons, in order to convey knowledge of their mind, or the condition of their action. Now this obscure time is described here; hence it says, "he came by night." For night is dark, and it fit the quality of Nicodemus's disposition, who came to Jesus not with security and free open declaration, but with fear; for he was one of those rulers of whom it is said in John 12:42 that they believed in him, "but because of the Pharisees they did not confess it, lest they be cast out of the synagogue." For they did not love perfectly; hence it is added, "for they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God." Night also fits his ignorance and imperfect knowledge, which he then had concerning Christ; Romans 13:12: "the night is passed," etc.; Psalm 81:5: "they have not known nor understood, they walk in darkness." From his confession, however, he is described when it is added, "and he said to him: Rabbi, we know that you have come a teacher from God." Here he confesses Christ's office in teaching, when he says "Rabbi," etc., and his power in acting, where it says, "for no one can do these signs which you do, unless God be with him." And indeed in both he speaks truly, although he confesses but little. For it is true that he calls him "Rabbi," that is, teacher, because, as is said below in chapter 13:13, "you call me Master and Lord, and you say well, for I am." For Nicodemus had read what is written in Joel 2:23: "Rejoice, children of Zion, and be glad in the Lord your God, for he has given you the teacher of justice." But he says too little, because he says that he came a teacher from God, but is silent that he is God. For to come a teacher from God is common to all good prelates; Jeremiah 3:15: "and I will give you pastors according to my own heart; and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine"; hence this is not something singular to Christ, although men teach in one way and Christ in another. For other teachers teach only outwardly, but Christ also inwardly, because, as is said above in chapter 1:9, "he was the true light, which enlightens every man"; and therefore he alone gives wisdom; Luke 21:15: "I will give you a mouth and wisdom." And this no mere man can say. His power, however, he confesses from the signs seen, as if to say: I believe that you have come a teacher from God, because "no one can do these signs" that you do. And he speaks truly, because the signs that Christ did could not be done except divinely, and because God was with him; below, chapter 8:29: "he who sent me is with me." But he says too little, because he believed that Christ did not do signs by his own power, as though needing an external power, as if God were not with him through unity of essence, but only through an infusion of grace. And this indeed is false, because he worked signs not by an external power, but by his own, for the power of God and of Christ is the same. Similar is what the woman says to Elijah, 3 Kings 17:24: "by this deed I have known that you are a man of God." Consequently, when it says, "Jesus answered and said to him," etc., he sets forth the necessity of spiritual regeneration arising from the ignorance of Nicodemus. And therefore he says, "amen, amen." Here it must be noted that this word "amen" is Hebrew, which Christ frequently used; hence out of reverence for it, no translator, whether Greek or Latin, was willing to translate it. And sometimes it signifies the same as "true," or the same as "truly"; sometimes, however, the same as "let it be done." Hence in Psalms 71, 88, and 106, where we have "let it be done" (fiat), in the Hebrew it is "amen, amen." But of the Evangelists, John alone doubles this word. The reason for this is that the other Evangelists principally hand down those things that pertain to the humanity of Christ, for which, since they are more easily credible, a lesser assertion was necessary; but John principally treats of those things that pertain to the divinity of Christ, which, since they are hidden and remote from the knowledge of men, required a greater assertion. Next it must be noted that this response of Christ seems altogether inconsistent with what was proposed by Nicodemus, unless it is diligently considered. For how does it seem to agree, what Nicodemus said, "Rabbi, we know that you have come from God," with what the Lord answered, "unless a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God"? But it must be noted, as has already been said, that Nicodemus, having an imperfect opinion of Christ, confessed him a teacher and confessed that he did these signs as a mere man. The Lord therefore wishes to show him how he might arrive at a higher knowledge of him. And indeed the Lord could have disputed about this; but because this would have turned into contention, the contrary of which is written of him in Isaiah 42:2, "he shall not contend," therefore with gentleness he willed to lead him to true knowledge, as if to say: it is no wonder if you believe me a mere man, because those secrets of divinity cannot be known by anyone unless he has attained spiritual regeneration. And this is what he says: "unless a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." Here it must be known that, since vision is an act of life, according to different lives there are different visions. For there is a certain carnal life, by which all other things commonly live, and this has carnal vision, or knowledge. And there is spiritual life, by which man is conformed to God and to the holy spirits, and this has spiritual vision. According to the carnal, indeed, spiritual things cannot be seen; 1 Corinthians 2:14: "the animal man does not perceive those things that are of the Spirit of God," but they are perceived by spiritual vision; hence it is added there, "the things that are of God, no one knows but the Spirit of God." Now it is the Spirit who regenerates; hence the Apostle, Romans 8:15: "you have not received again the spirit of bondage in fear, but you have received the spirit of adoption." And this spirit indeed we receive through spiritual regeneration; Titus 3:5: "he saved us by the washing of regeneration of the Holy Spirit." If therefore spiritual vision comes only through the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit is poured into us through the washing of spiritual regeneration, then we cannot see the kingdom of God except through the washing of regeneration; and therefore he says, "unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." As if to say: it is no wonder if you do not see the kingdom of God, because no one can see it unless he receives the Holy Spirit, through whom he is reborn as a son of God. Now to a kingdom belongs not only the royal throne, but also those things that pertain to the governance of the kingdom, namely royal dignity, the benefits of graces, and the way of justice by which the kingdom is made firm; and therefore he says, "he cannot see the kingdom of God," that is, the glory and dignity of God, that is, the mysteries of eternal salvation, which are beheld through the justice of faith; Romans 14:17: "the kingdom of God is not food and drink." Now in the old law there was a certain spiritual regeneration, but imperfect and figural; 1 Corinthians 10:2: "all were baptized in Moses, in the cloud and in the sea," that is, they received Baptism in figure. And therefore they indeed saw the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but only figuratively; Hebrews 11:13: "seeing them afar off." But in the new law there is manifest spiritual regeneration, yet it is still imperfect, because we are renewed inwardly only through grace, but not outwardly through incorruption; 2 Corinthians 4:16: "although our outward man is corrupted, yet the inward man is renewed day by day." And therefore we see the kingdom of God and the mysteries of eternal salvation, but imperfectly, because, as is said in 1 Corinthians 13:12, "we see now through a glass in a dark manner," and so on. But in our homeland it will be perfect regeneration, because we shall be renewed both inwardly and outwardly. And therefore we shall see the kingdom of God most perfectly; hence 1 Corinthians 13:12: "but then we shall see face to face"; and 1 John 3:2: "when he shall appear, we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is." It is clear therefore that, just as no one has bodily vision unless born, so too no one can have spiritual vision unless reborn. And according to the threefold regeneration there is a threefold manner of vision. Note, moreover, that in the Greek it does not have "again" (denuo), but anothen, that is, "from above," which Jerome translated as "again," so that it should imply an addition. And thus Jerome understood it, saying "unless he be born again," as if to say: unless reborn once more through a supernatural generation. Chrysostom, however, says that to be born from above is proper to the Son of God, because he alone is born from above; below (in this chapter), "he who comes from above is above all." And Christ is said to be born from above both with respect to time (if one may so speak), because he was begotten from eternity; Psalm 109:3: "before the daystar I begot you"; and with respect to the principle of his generation, because he is from the heavenly Father; below, chapter 6:38: "I came down not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me." Because, therefore, our regeneration is unto the likeness of the Son of God, according to Romans 8:29, "whom he foreknew, he also predestined to be made conformable to the image of his Son," therefore, since that generation is from above, our generation too is from above, both with respect to time, through eternal predestination — Ephesians 1:4: "he chose us in him before the foundation of the world" — and with respect to the gift of God — below, chapter 6:44: "no one can come to me, unless the Father who sent me draws him"; Ephesians 2:5: "by the grace of God you are saved," and so on. Consequently, when it says, "Nicodemus said to him," etc., he sets forth the manner and reason of this spiritual regeneration; and concerning this, first is set forth the doubt of Nicodemus; second, the response of Christ, "Jesus answered: Amen, amen, I say to you," and so on. Concerning the first it must be known that, as is said in 1 Corinthians 2:14, "the animal man does not perceive those things that are of the Spirit of God," and therefore, since Nicodemus was still carnal and animal, he could not understand the things that were said except carnally. And therefore what the Lord had said concerning spiritual regeneration, he understood as concerning carnal regeneration. And this is what he says: "How can a man be born when he is old?" Here, according to Chrysostom, it must be known that Nicodemus wished to object against the words of the Savior. But nevertheless his objection is laughable, because Christ speaks of spiritual regeneration, whereas here he objects concerning carnal regeneration. Likewise all arguments brought forward to attack the things that are of faith are laughable, because they are not according to the intention of Sacred Scripture. Now Nicodemus objects against the words of the Lord in two ways, according as the word of the Lord seemed impossible in two respects, namely that a man be born again. In one way, on account of the irreversibility of human life: for from old age a man cannot return to childhood. Hence it is said in Job 16:23: "the path" — namely, the present life — "by which I shall not return, I walk." And according to this he says, "How can a man be born when he is old?" As if to say: shall he again become a child so as to be reborn? Job 7:10: "He shall return no more into his house, neither shall his place know him any more." Second, from the manner of carnal generation: for a man at the beginning, when he is generated, is of small size, so that the maternal womb can contain him; but afterward, when he has already been born, he is brought little by little to continual growth, so that he can no longer be contained in the maternal womb. And therefore he says, "can he enter a second time into his mother's womb, and be born again?" As if to say, no, because the womb does not contain him. But these considerations have no place in spiritual generation, because a man, however much he may have grown spiritually old through sin, according to Psalm 31:3, "because I was silent, all my bones grew old," can, through the help of divine grace, come to newness, according to Psalm 102:5, "your youth shall be renewed like the eagle's." He can, however great he may be, enter into the spiritual womb, namely of the Church, through the sacrament of Baptism. Now what the spiritual womb is, is manifest; otherwise it would never be said, "from the womb, before the daystar, I begot you." Nevertheless there is a certain similarity in what is said; for, just as a man once born carnally cannot be born again, so also one once born spiritually through Baptism cannot be born again, because he ought not to be baptized again; Ephesians 4:5: "one Lord, one faith, one Baptism." Consequently, when it says, "Jesus answered," etc., the response of Christ is set forth. And concerning this he does three things. First he resolves the arguments of Nicodemus, showing the quality of regeneration; second he manifests the solution through reason, where it says, "that which is born of the flesh, is flesh," etc.; third, through an example, where it says, "do not wonder," and so on. He resolves, therefore, the objections, showing that the regeneration of which he speaks is spiritual, and not carnal. And this is what he says: "Amen, amen, I say to you, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God," as if to say: you understand this of carnal generation, but I speak of spiritual generation. But note that above he had said, "he cannot see the kingdom of God," while here he says, "he cannot enter into the kingdom of God," which is the same thing. For the things that are of the kingdom of God no one sees, unless he enters the kingdom of God; and he sees only so much as he enters. Revelation 2:17: "in the stone a new name written, which no one knows but he who receives it." Now that spiritual regeneration should come about from the Spirit, has its reason. For it is fitting that what is generated be generated unto the likeness of the one generating; but we are regenerated as sons of God unto the likeness of the true Son; it is fitting therefore that spiritual regeneration come about through that by which we are made like unto the true Son, which indeed comes about through this, that we have his Spirit. Romans 8:9: "if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his"; 1 John 4:13: "in this we know that we abide in him, and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit," and so on. It is fitting therefore that spiritual regeneration come about through the Holy Spirit. Romans 8:15: "you have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear, but the spirit of adoption of sons"; below, chapter 6:63: "it is the spirit that gives life," and so on. And also for this regeneration water is necessary, on account of three things. First indeed on account of the condition of human nature. For man consists of soul and body, and if in his regeneration there were spirit alone, only that which is spiritual in man would be shown to be regenerated. In order therefore that the flesh too be regenerated, it is fitting that, just as there is spirit there, through which the soul is regenerated, so there be something corporeal there, through which the body is regenerated; and this is water. Second, on account of human knowledge: for, as Dionysius says, divine wisdom so orders all things that it provides for each thing according to the manner of its own condition. Now man is naturally a knowing being; it is fitting therefore that spiritual gifts be conferred upon men in such a way that they may know them; 1 Corinthians 2:12: "that we may know the things that are given us by God." Now the natural manner of this knowledge is that he know spiritual things through sensible things, since all our knowledge begins from sense. It was fitting therefore, in order that we understand what is spiritual in this regeneration, that there be in it something sensible and material, namely water, through which we may understand that, just as water washes and cleanses corporeally on the outside, so also through Baptism a man is washed and cleansed inwardly and spiritually. Third, on account of the fittingness of the cause: for the cause of our regeneration is the incarnate Word. Above, chapter 1:12: "he gave them power to become sons of God." It is fitting therefore that in the sacraments, which have their efficacy from the power of the incarnate Word, there be something corresponding to the Word, and something corresponding to the flesh, or body. And this spiritually is the water in the sacrament of Baptism, namely so that through it we may be conformed to the death of Christ, while we are submerged in it when we are baptized, just as Christ was three days in the belly of the earth; Romans 6:4: "for we are buried together with him by Baptism." This mystery, too, was signified in the first production of things, Genesis 1, when the Spirit of the Lord was borne over the waters. But through the touch of the most pure flesh of Christ a greater power was conferred upon the waters: because in the beginning the waters brought forth the creeping thing having a living soul; but from the time that Christ was baptized in the Jordan, water renders spiritual souls. Now through the fact that here he says, "unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit," it manifestly appears that the Holy Spirit is God. For above, chapter 1:13, it says: "not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God, are born." From which the following argument is formed: He from whom men are spiritually reborn is God; but men are reborn spiritually through the Holy Spirit, as is said here; therefore the Holy Spirit is God. But here there is a twofold question. The first is this: if no one enters the kingdom of God unless reborn of water, and the ancient fathers were not reborn of water, because they were not baptized, then they did not enter the kingdom of God. The other is this: since Baptism is threefold, namely of water, of desire (flaminis), and of blood, and many were baptized by the latter two, whom we say entered the kingdom of God immediately (though they were not reborn of water), it does not seem to be true, what is said here, "unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit." The response: it must be said, as to the first, that regeneration from water and the Holy Spirit comes about in two ways, namely in truth and in figure. Now the ancient fathers, although they were not regenerated with true regeneration, were nevertheless regenerated with figural regeneration, because they always had some sensible sign, in which true regeneration was prefigured; and according to this, being reborn, they entered the kingdom of God, once the price was paid. As to the second it must be said that those who are reborn by the Baptism of blood and of desire, although they do not have regeneration in act, nevertheless have it in desire (in voto); for otherwise the Baptism of blood would be worth nothing, nor could there be a Baptism of the Spirit. Thus therefore, in order that a man enter the kingdom of God, it is fitting that there be present the Baptism of water in reality, as is the case in all who are baptized; or in desire, as is the case in martyrs and catechumens, who are overtaken by death before they fulfill their desire; or in figure, as in the ancient fathers. From this, that it is said, "unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit," the Pelagians erred, saying that children are baptized, not indeed that they be cleansed from sins which they do not yet have, but so that they may be able to enter the kingdom of God. But this is false: because, as Augustine says in the book On the Baptism of Infants, it is unfitting that the image of God, namely man, be withdrawn from the kingdom of God, except on account of some impediment, which cannot be, except sin. It is fitting therefore that in children who are withdrawn from the kingdom there be some sin, namely original sin. Consequently, when it says, "that which is born of the flesh, is flesh," etc., he proves through reason that it is fitting to be born of water and the Holy Spirit; and his reasoning is as follows. No one can arrive at the kingdom unless he be made spiritual; but someone is not made spiritual except through the Holy Spirit; therefore no one can enter the kingdom of God unless reborn of the Holy Spirit. He says therefore, "that which is born of the flesh, is flesh," that is, birth according to the flesh causes birth into carnal life; 1 Corinthians 15:47: "the first man was of the earth, earthly"; and "that which is born of the Spirit," that is, from the power of the Holy Spirit, "is spirit," that is, spiritual. Note, moreover, that this preposition "of" (ex) sometimes designates the material cause, as when I say, "a knife is of iron"; sometimes the efficient cause, as "a house is of a builder." And according to this, what is said, "that which is born of the flesh," can be understood in two ways, effectively and materially. Effectively indeed, because the power that is in the flesh is effective of generation; materially, however, because something carnal in animals is the matter of the thing generated. But from the spirit nothing is said to be born materially, since the spirit is immutable, whereas matter is the subject of transformation; but it is said effectively. According to this, therefore, we can take a threefold generation. One which is from flesh both materially and effectively, which is common to all who have a carnal state. Another is according to spirit effectively, according to which we are regenerated as sons of God through the grace of the Holy Spirit, and are made spiritual. The third is intermediate, namely that which is from flesh materially only, and from the Holy Spirit effectively. And this is singular and proper to Christ alone: because materially he was born having flesh from the flesh of his mother, and effectively he is from the Holy Spirit; Matthew 1:20: "for that which is born in her, is of the Holy Spirit." And therefore he was born holy; Luke 1:35: "the Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you: and therefore also that which shall be born of you holy shall be called the Son of God."”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“That which is born of the flesh, is flesh,.... Man by his natural birth, and as he is born according to the flesh of his natural parents, is a mere natural man; that is, he is carnal and corrupt, and cannot discern spiritual things; nor can he, as such, enter into, and inherit the kingdom of God; see Co1 2:14. And therefore there is a necessity of his being born again, or of the grace of the Spirit, and of his becoming a spiritual man; and if he was to be, or could be born again of the flesh, or ever so many times enter into his mothers womb, and be born, was it possible, he would still be but a natural and a carnal man, and so unfit for the kingdom of God. By "flesh" here, is not meant the fleshy part of man, the body, as generated of another fleshy substance; for this is no other than what may be said of brutes; and besides, if this was the sense, "spirit", in the next clause, must mean the soul, whereas one soul is not generated from another: but by flesh is designed, the nature of man; not merely as weak and frail, but as unclean and corrupt, through sin; and which being propagated by natural generation from sinful men, cannot be otherwise; for "who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one", Job 14:4. And though the soul of man is of a spiritual nature, and remains a spirit, notwithstanding the pollution of sin; yet it being defiled with the flesh, and altogether under the power and influence of the lusts of the flesh, it may well be said to be carnal or fleshly: hence "flesh", as it stands opposed to spirit, signifies the corruption of nature, Gal 5:17; and such who are in a state of unregeneracy, are said to be after the flesh, and in the flesh, and even the mind itself is said to be carnal, Rom 8:5. And that which is born of the Spirit, is spirit: a man that is regenerated by the Spirit of God, and the efficacy of his grace, is a spiritual man; he can discern and judge all things of a spiritual nature; he is a fit person to be admitted to spiritual ordinances and privileges; and appears to be in the spiritual kingdom of Christ; and has a right to the world of blessed spirits above; and when his body is raised a spiritual body, will be admitted in soul, body, and spirit, into the joy of his Lord. "Spirit" in the first part of this clause, signifies the Holy Spirit of God, the author of regeneration and sanctification; whence that work is called the sanctification of the Spirit, and the renewing of the Holy Ghost, Pe1 1:2. And "spirit", in the latter part, intends the internal work of grace upon the soul, from whence a man is denominated a spiritual man; and as a child bears the same name with its parent, so this is called by the same, as the author and efficient cause of it: and besides, it is of a spiritual nature itself, and exerts itself in spiritual acts and exercises, and directs to, and engages in spiritual things; and has its seat also in the spirit, or soul of man.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Of water and of the Spirit - To the baptism of water a man was admitted when he became a proselyte to the Jewish religion; and, in this baptism, he promised in the most solemn manner to renounce idolatry, to take the God of Israel for his God, and to have his life conformed to the precepts of the Divine law. But the water which was used on the occasion was only an emblem of the Holy Spirit. The soul was considered as in a state of defilement, because of past sin: now, as by that water the body was washed, cleansed, and refreshed, so, by the influences of the Holy Spirit, the soul was to be purified from its defilement, and strengthened to walk in the way of truth and holiness. When John came baptizing with water, he gave the Jews the plainest intimations that this would not suffice; that it was only typical of that baptism of the Holy Ghost, under the similitude of fire, which they must all receive from Jesus Christ: see Mat 3:11. Therefore, our Lord asserts that a man must be born of water and the Spirit, i.e. of the Holy Ghost, which, represented under the similitude of water, cleanses, refreshes, and purifies the soul. Reader, hast thou never had any other baptism than that of water? If thou hast not had any other, take Jesus Christ's word for it, thou canst not, in thy present state, enter into the kingdom of God. I would not say to thee merely, read what it is to be born of the Spirit: but pray, O pray to God incessantly, till he give thee to feel what is implied in it! Remember, it is Jesus only who baptizes with the Holy Ghost: see Joh 1:33. He who receives not this baptism has neither right nor title to the kingdom of God; nor can he with any propriety be termed a Christian, because that which essentially distinguished the Christian dispensation from that of the Jews was, that its author baptized all his followers with the Holy Ghost. Though baptism by water, into the Christian faith, was necessary to every Jew and Gentile that entered into the kingdom of the Messiah, it is not necessary that by water and the Spirit (in this place) we should understand two different things: it is probably only an elliptical form of speech, for the Holy Spirit under the similitude of water; as, in Mat 3:3, the Holy Ghost and fire, do not mean two things, but one, viz. the Holy Ghost under the similitude of fire - pervading every part, refining and purifying the whole.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Unless a man be born again of water, and the Holy Ghost. Though the word Holy be now wanting in all Greek copies, it is certainly the sense. The ancient Fathers, and particularly St. Augustine in divers places, from these words, prove the necessity of giving baptism to infants: and by Christ’s adding water, is excluded a metaphorical baptism. See also Acts viii. 36. and x. 47. and Titus iii. 5. (Witham) — Except a man be born again. That is, unless you are born again by a spiritual regeneration in God, all the knowledge which you learn from me, will not be spiritual but carnal. But I say to you, that neither you nor any other person, unless you be born again in God, can understand or conceive the glory which is in me. (St. Chrysostom)”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“The means of the second birth are pointed out, water as the instru- ment, and the Holy Ghost as the efficient cause. The birth sometimes takes place through the Holy Ghost without the water, the desire being accepted for the deed. The text has : " Spirit," without the epithet”
“holy." St. Cyril read in like manner, who, nevertheless, observes :”
“the spirit of man is sanctified by the Holy Ghost : the body is sanctified by the water." — " By the operation of the Holy Ghost the waters are endowed with divine virtue, by which they cleanse the body of the baptized person."”
“Without the new birth, no one can be a member of the Church, which is the kingdom of God on earth. Without this membership, no one can enter the kingdom of heaven.”
“The use of the plural number is here remarkable. It may imply a reference to facts to which Jesus and His followers bore testimony, as well known to them : but it may have a deeper reference to the three who give testimony in heaven and on earth. " Since the Father and the Holy Ghost were in Him," observes St. Cyril of Alexandria, " He used the plural number, speaking of those who bore witness, so that in a manner, according to the law, every thing was established by two or three witnesses."”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“of water and of the Spirit--A twofold explanation of the "new birth," so startling to Nicodemus. To a Jewish ecclesiastic, so familiar with the symbolical application of water, in every variety of way and form of expression, this language was fitted to show that the thing intended was no other than a thorough spiritual purification by the operation of the Holy Ghost. Indeed, element of water and operation of the Spirit are brought together in a glorious evangelical prediction of Ezekiel (Eze 36:25-27), which Nicodemus might have been reminded of had such spiritualities not been almost lost in the reigning formalism. Already had the symbol of water been embodied in an initiatory ordinance, in the baptism of the Jewish expectants of Messiah by the Baptist, not to speak of the baptism of Gentile proselytes before that; and in the Christian Church it was soon to become the great visible door of entrance into "the kingdom of God," the reality being the sole work of the Holy Ghost (Tit 3:5).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.